0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views8 pages

Pad Foundation Design Analysis Report

Uploaded by

kheang meng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
68 views8 pages

Pad Foundation Design Analysis Report

Uploaded by

kheang meng
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


1
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

PAD FOUNDATION EXAMPLE


Foundation analysis in accordance with EN1997-1:2004 + A1:2013 incorporating corrigendum February 2009 and the
recommended values
Tedds calculation version 3.3.05

Pad foundation details


Length of foundation; Lx = 800 mm
Width of foundation; Ly = 600 mm
Foundation area; A = Lx  Ly = 0.480 m2
Depth of foundation; h = 350 mm
Depth of soil over foundation; hsoil = 300 mm
Level of water; hwater = 0 mm
Density of water; water = 9.8 kN/m3
Density of concrete; conc = 25.0 kN/m3

69.9 kN/m2 69.9 kN/m2

69.9 kN/m2 69.9 kN/m2

Column no.1 details


Length of column; lx1 = 800 mm
Width of column; ly1 = 300 mm
position in x-direction; x1 = 400 mm
position in y-direction; y1 = 300 mm
Soil properties
Density of soil; soil = 20.0 kN/m3
Characteristic cohesion; c'k = 0 kN/m2
Characteristic effective shear resistance angle; 'k = 25 deg
Characteristic friction angle; k = 19.3 deg
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


2
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

Foundation loads
Permanent surcharge load; FGsur = 5.0 kN/m2
Variable surcharge load; FQsur = 5.0 kN/m2
Self weight; Fswt = h  conc = 8.8 kN/m2
Soil weight; Fsoil = hsoil  soil = 6.0 kN/m2

Column no.1 loads


Permanent horizontal load in x-direction; FGx1 = 2.0 kN
Permanent horizontal load in y-direction; FGy1 = 2.0 kN
Permanent axial load; FGz1 = 8.1 kN
Variable axial load; FQz1 = 4.1 kN
Wind axial load; FWz1 = 1.0 kN
Permanent moment in x-direction; MGx1 = 0.4 kNm
Variable moment in x-direction; MQx1 = 0.1 kNm
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination1
Partial factor set; A1
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3; G = 1.35
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3; Q = 1.50
Variable favourable action - Table A.3; Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for soil parameters - Combination1


Soil factor set; M1
Angle of shearing resistance - Table A.4; ' = 1.00
Effective cohesion - Table A.4; c' = 1.00
Weight density - Table A.4;  = 1.00

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination1


Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing - Table A.5; R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5; R.h = 1.00

Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)


Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; Fdx = G  FGx1 = 2.7 kN
Force in y-direction; Fdy = G  FGy1 = 2.7 kN
Force in z-direction; Fdz = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Q  (A  FQsur + FQz1) + Q 
FWz1 = 35.0 kN
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-direction; Mdx = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Lx / 2 + FGz1  x1) + G  MGx1 + Q  (A
 FQsur  Lx / 2 + FQz1  x1) + Q  MQx1 + Q  FWz1  x1 + (G  FGx1)  h =
15.6 kNm
Moment in y-direction; Mdy = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Ly / 2 + FGz1  y1) + Q  (A  FQsur  Ly /
2 + FQz1  y1) + Q  FWz1  y1 + (G  FGy1)  h = 11.5 kNm
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


3
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-direction; ex = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 45 mm
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-direction; ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 27 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = Lx - 2  ex = 710 mm
Effective width; L'y = Ly - 2  ey = 546 mm
Effective area; A' = L'x  L'y = 0.388 m2

Pad base pressure


Design base pressure; fdz = Fdz / A' = 90.4 kN/m2
Ultimate bearing capacity under drained conditions (Annex D.4)
Design angle of shearing resistance; 'd = atan(tan('k) / ') = 25.000 deg
Design effective cohesion; c'd = c'k / c' = 0.000 kN/m2
Effective overburden pressure; q = (h + hsoil)  soil - hwater  water = 13.000 kN/m2
Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q /  = 13.000 kN/m2
Bearing resistance factors; Nq = Exp(  tan('d))  (tan(45 deg + 'd / 2))2 = 10.662
Nc = (Nq - 1)  cot('d) = 20.721
N = 2  (Nq - 1)  tan('d) = 9.011
Foundation shape factors; sq = 1 + (L'y / L'x)  sin('d) = 1.325
s = 1 - 0.3  (L'y / L'x) = 0.769
sc = (sq  Nq - 1) / (Nq - 1) = 1.359
Load inclination factors; H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 3.8 kN
my = [2 + (L'y / L'x)] / [1 + (L'y / L'x)] = 1.565
mx = [2 + (L'x / L'y)] / [1 + (L'x / L'y)] = 1.435
m = mx  cos(atan(Fdy / Fdx))2 + my  sin(atan(Fdy / Fdx))2 = 1.500
iq = [1 - H / (Fdz + A'  c'd  cot('d))]m = 0.841
i = [1 - H / (Fdz + A'  c'd  cot('d))]m + 1 = 0.749
ic = iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc  tan('d)) = 0.825
Ultimate bearing capacity; nf = c'd  Nc  sc  ic + q'  Nq  sq  iq + 0.5  soil  L'y  N  s  i = 182.9
kN/m2
PASS - Ultimate bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; Fdx = G  FGx1 = 2.7 kN
Force in y-direction; Fdy = G  FGy1 = 2.7 kN
Force in z-direction; Fdz = Gf  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Qf  (A  FQsur + FQz1) + Qf 
FWz1 = 17.6 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 3.8 kN
Angle to horizontal force; H = 45 deg
Design friction angle d = atan(tan(k) / ') = 19.3 deg
Passive pressure coefficient Kp = (1 + sin('d)) / (1 - sin('d)) = 2.464
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


4
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

Design soil density soil' = soil /  = 20 kN/m3


Passive soil resistance Fp = Gf  Kp  cos(d)  soil'  (Ly  cos(H) + Lx  sin(H))  h  (h + 2 
hsoil) / 2 = 7.7 kN
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a) RH.d = Fdz  tan(d) + Fp = 13.8 kN
H / RH.d = 0.276
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Design approach 1
Partial factors on actions - Combination2
Partial factor set; A2
Permanent unfavourable action - Table A.3; G = 1.00
Permanent favourable action - Table A.3; Gf = 1.00
Variable unfavourable action - Table A.3; Q = 1.30
Variable favourable action - Table A.3; Qf = 0.00

Partial factors for soil parameters - Combination2


Soil factor set; M2
Angle of shearing resistance - Table A.4; ' = 1.25
Effective cohesion - Table A.4; c' = 1.25
Weight density - Table A.4;  = 1.00

Partial factors for spread foundations - Combination2


Resistance factor set; R1
Bearing - Table A.5; R.v = 1.00
Sliding - Table A.5; R.h = 1.00

Bearing resistance (Section 6.5.2)


Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; Fdx = G  FGx1 = 2.0 kN
Force in y-direction; Fdy = G  FGy1 = 2.0 kN
Force in z-direction; Fdz = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Q  (A  FQsur + FQz1) + Q 
FWz1 = 27.4 kN
Moments on foundation
Moment in x-direction; Mdx = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Lx / 2 + FGz1  x1) + G  MGx1 + Q  (A
 FQsur  Lx / 2 + FQz1  x1) + Q  MQx1 + Q  FWz1  x1 + (G  FGx1)  h =
12.1 kNm
Moment in y-direction; Mdy = G  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur)  Ly / 2 + FGz1  y1) + Q  (A  FQsur  Ly /
2 + FQz1  y1) + Q  FWz1  y1 + (G  FGy1)  h = 8.9 kNm

Eccentricity of base reaction


Eccentricity of base reaction in x-direction; ex = Mdx / Fdz - Lx / 2 = 43 mm
Eccentricity of base reaction in y-direction; ey = Mdy / Fdz - Ly / 2 = 26 mm
Effective area of base
Effective length; L'x = Lx - 2  ex = 713 mm
Effective width; L'y = Ly - 2  ey = 549 mm
Effective area; A' = L'x  L'y = 0.391 m2
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


5
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

Pad base pressure


Design base pressure; fdz = Fdz / A' = 69.9 kN/m2
Ultimate bearing capacity under drained conditions (Annex D.4)
Design angle of shearing resistance; 'd = atan(tan('k) / ') = 20.458 deg
Design effective cohesion; c'd = c'k / c' = 0.000 kN/m2
Effective overburden pressure; q = (h + hsoil)  soil - hwater  water = 13.000 kN/m2
Design effective overburden pressure; q' = q /  = 13.000 kN/m2
Bearing resistance factors; Nq = Exp(  tan('d))  (tan(45 deg + 'd / 2))2 = 6.698
Nc = (Nq - 1)  cot('d) = 15.273
N = 2  (Nq - 1)  tan('d) = 4.251
Foundation shape factors; sq = 1 + (L'y / L'x)  sin('d) = 1.269
s = 1 - 0.3  (L'y / L'x) = 0.769
sc = (sq  Nq - 1) / (Nq - 1) = 1.316
Load inclination factors; H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 2.8 kN
my = [2 + (L'y / L'x)] / [1 + (L'y / L'x)] = 1.565
mx = [2 + (L'x / L'y)] / [1 + (L'x / L'y)] = 1.435
m = mx  cos(atan(Fdy / Fdx))2 + my  sin(atan(Fdy / Fdx))2 = 1.500
iq = [1 - H / (Fdz + A'  c'd  cot('d))]m = 0.849
i = [1 - H / (Fdz + A'  c'd  cot('d))]m + 1 = 0.761
ic = iq - (1 - iq) / (Nc  tan('d)) = 0.823
Ultimate bearing capacity; nf = c'd  Nc  sc  ic + q'  Nq  sq  iq + 0.5  soil  L'y  N  s  i = 107.5
kN/m2
PASS - Ultimate bearing capacity exceeds design base pressure
Sliding resistance (Section 6.5.3)
Forces on foundation
Force in x-direction; Fdx = G  FGx1 = 2.0 kN
Force in y-direction; Fdy = G  FGy1 = 2.0 kN
Force in z-direction; Fdz = Gf  (A  (Fswt + Fsoil + FGsur) + FGz1) + Qf  (A  FQsur + FQz1) + Qf 
FWz1 = 17.6 kN
Sliding resistance verification (Section 6.5.3)
Horizontal force on foundation H = [Fdx2 + Fdy2]0.5 = 2.8 kN
Angle to horizontal force; H = 45 deg
Design friction angle d = atan(tan(k) / ') = 15.651 deg
Passive pressure coefficient Kp = (1 + sin('d)) / (1 - sin('d)) = 2.075
Design soil density soil' = soil /  = 20 kN/m3
Passive soil resistance Fp = Gf  Kp  cos(d)  soil'  (Ly  cos(H) + Lx  sin(H))  h  (h + 2 
hsoil) / 2 = 6.6 kN
Sliding resistance (exp.6.3a) RH.d = Fdz  tan(d) + Fp = 11.5 kN
H / RH.d = 0.246
PASS - Foundation is not subject to failure by sliding
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


6
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

PAD FOUNDATION EXAMPLE


Foundation design in accordance with EN1992-1-1:2004 + A1:2014 incorporating corrigenda January 2008, November
2010 and January 2014 and the recommended values
Tedds calculation version 3.3.05

Concrete details (Table 3.1 - Strength and deformation characteristics for concrete)
Concrete strength class; C20/25
Characteristic compressive cylinder strength; fck = 20 N/mm2
Characteristic compressive cube strength; fck,cube = 25 N/mm2
Mean value of compressive cylinder strength; fcm = fck + 8 N/mm2 = 28 N/mm2
Mean value of axial tensile strength; fctm = 0.3 N/mm2  (fck/ 1 N/mm2)2/3 = 2.2 N/mm2
5% fractile of axial tensile strength; fctk,0.05 = 0.7  fctm = 1.5 N/mm2
Secant modulus of elasticity of concrete; Ecm = 22 kN/mm2  [fcm/10 N/mm2]0.3 = 29962 N/mm2
Partial factor for concrete (Table 2.1N); C = 1.50
Compressive strength coefficient (cl.3.1.6(1)); cc = 1.00
Design compressive concrete strength (exp.3.15); fcd = cc  fck / C = 13.3 N/mm2
[Link] [Link] plain concrete (cl.12.3.1(1)); ct,pl = 0.80
[Link] for plain concrete (exp.12.1); fctd,pl = ct,pl  fctk,0.05 / C = 0.8 N/mm2
Maximum aggregate size; hagg = 20 mm
Ultimate strain - Table 3.1; cu2 = 0.0035
Shortening strain - Table 3.1; cu3 = 0.0035
Effective compression zone height factor;  = 0.80
Effective strength factor;  = 1.00
Bending coefficient k1; K1 = 0.44
Bending coefficient k2; K2 = 1.25  (0.6 + 0.0014/cu2) =1.25
Bending coefficient k3; K3 =0.54
Bending coefficient k4; K4 =1.25  (0.6 + 0.0014/cu2) = 1.25

Reinforcement details
Characteristic yield strength of reinforcement; fyk = 390 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity of reinforcement; Es = 210000 N/mm2
Partial factor for reinforcing steel (Table 2.1N); S = 1.15
Design yield strength of reinforcement; fyd = fyk / S = 339 N/mm2
Nominal cover to top of foundation; cnom_t = 50 mm
Nominal cover to bottom of foundation; cnom_b = 50 mm
Nominal cover to side of foundation; cnom_s = 50 mm
Nominal cover to top reinforcement; cnom_t = 50 mm
Shear diagram, x axis (kN)
6.4

0.0
0.0

-12.3
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


7
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

Moment diagram, x axis (kNm)


0.0
1.1

2.7

Shear diagram, y axis (kN)


7

0.0
0.0

-11.7

Moment diagram, y axis (kNm)

0.9 0.5

1.9

Punching shear (Section 6.4)


Strength reduction factor (exp 6.6N); v = 0.6  [1 - fck / 250 N/mm2] = 0.552
Average depth to reinforcement; d = 295 mm
Maximum punching shear resistance (cl.6.4.5(3)); [Link] = 0.4  v  fcd = 2.944 N/mm2
k = min(1 + (200 mm / d), 2) = 1.823
Longitudinal reinforcement ratio (cl.6.4.4(1)); lx = [Link] / (Ly  d) = 0.002
ly = [Link] / (Lx  d) = 0.002
l = min((lx  ly), 0.02) = 0.002
CRd,c = 0.18 / C =0.120
vmin = 0.035 N1/2/mm  k3/2  fck0.5 = 0.385 N/mm2
Design punching shear resistance (exp.6.47); vRd.c = max(CRd.c  k  (100 N2/mm4  l  fck)1/3, vmin) = 0.385 N/mm2
Design punching shear resistance at 1d (exp. 6.50); vRd.c1 = (2  d / d)  vRd.c = 0.771 N/mm2

Column No.1 - Punching shear perimeter at column face


Punching shear perimeter; u0 = 1600 mm
Area within punching shear perimeter; A0 = 0.240 m2
Maximum punching shear force; [Link] = 7.6 kN
Punching shear stress factor (fig 6.21N);  = 1.500
Maximum punching shear stress (exp 6.38); [Link] =   [Link] / (u0  d) = 0.024 N/mm2
PASS - Maximum punching shear resistance exceeds maximum punching shear stress
Project Job Ref.

Section Sheet no./rev.


8
Calc. by Date Chk'd by Date App'd by Date
STR ENG. 08-Nov-24

10 bars @ 150 c/c bottom


10 bars @ 150 c/c top

10 bars @ 150 c/c bottom


10 bars @ 150 c/c top

You might also like