Module 1. Handouts
Module 1. Handouts
Learning outcomes
After completing this chapter you should have enhanced your ability to:
● explain the nature and significance of work groups and teams;
● relate the nature of informal groups and importance of group values and norms;
● examine factors that influence group cohesiveness and performance;
● identify characteristics of an effective work group and virtual teams;
● explain role structure of the organisation and individual role relationships;
● evaluate individual compared with group or team performance;
● review the importance and characteristics of successful groups or teams.
Cane suggests that organisations are sometimes unsure whether they have teams or simply
groups of people working together.
It is certainly true to say that any group of people who do not know they are a team cannot
be one. To become a team, a group of individuals needs to have a strong common purpose
and to work towards that purpose rather than individually. They need also to believe that
they will achieve more by co-operation than working individually.6
Whatever the debate on ‘groups’ or ‘teams’, what is clear is the increasing popularity of
teamworking and the importance to organisations of effective group working or teamworking.
Informal groups
The formal structure of the organisation, and system of role relationships, rules and proce-
dures, will be augmented by interpretation and development at the informal level. Groups will
also arise from social processes and the informal organisation (discussed in Chapter 3).
Informal groups are based more on personal relationships and agreement of group mem-
bers than on defined role relationships. They serve to satisfy psychological and social needs
not related necessarily to the tasks to be undertaken. Informal groups may devise ways of
attempting to satisfy members’ affiliation and other social motivations lacking in the work
situation. Membership can cut across the formal structure. These groups may comprise indi-
viduals from different parts of the organisation and/or from different levels of the organisa-
tion, both vertically and diagonally, as well as from the same horizontal level. An informal
group could also be the same as the formal group, or it might comprise a part only of the
formal group (see Figure 8.2).
Members of an informal group may appoint their own leader who exercises authority by
consent of the members themselves. The informal leader may be chosen as the person who
reflects the attitudes and values of the members, helps to resolve conflict, leads the group
in satisfying its goals, or liaises with management or other people outside the group. The
informal leader may change according to the particular situation facing the group. Although
not usually the case, it is possible for the informal leader to be the same person as the formal
leader appointed officially by management.
Figure 8.2 Examples of informal groups within the formal structure of an organisation
‘Away days’
Another approach to team building is the use of activity-based exercises undertaken as
part of corporate bonding, usually referred to as away days. The main objective is often
the building of team spirit and working relationships involving formal team dynamics and
assessment, although this may also be linked with a social purpose, for example to develop
interactions with colleagues, improve motivation or to thank and reward staff. The idea of
away days is subject to frequent criticism and even ridicule. Individuals may feel pressurised
into participating for fear of not appearing to support management initiative or their group
colleagues.
Baroness Kingsmill suggests that of course there is a case to be made for getting away
from day-to-day routines and pressures and spending time with colleagues: ‘Fostering rela-
tionships, encouraging creativity and innovative thinking and promoting better communi-
cation are all desirable goals. It is just that it is usually done so badly and is often a waste
of time and resource. Companies spend millions on away-days every year but rarely do
Organisational
Management and leadership
Teams tend to be a mirror image of their leaders. The form of management and style of lead-
ership adopted are major determinants of group cohesiveness. In general terms, cohesiveness
will be affected by such things as the manner in which the manager gives support, guidance
and encouragement to the group, provides opportunities for participation, attempts to resolve
conflicts and gives attention to both employee relations and task problems.
McKenna and Maister draw attention to the importance of the group leader establishing
a level of trust among the group by helping its members understand the behaviours that build
trust: ‘The job of the group leader is to encourage people to earn the trust of others in their
group and then show them how it can translate into greater commitment, greater creativity,
greater professional satisfaction, and better performance.’17 Farrell makes the point that man-
agers are ultimately responsible for creating a balance in the workplace and should take the
lead in setting standards of behaviour in teams.18
Success
Success is usually a strong motivational influence on cohesiveness and level of work perfor-
mance. Success or reward as a positive motivator can be perceived by group members in a
number of ways – for example, the satisfactory completion of a task through co-operative
action, praise from management, a feeling of high status, achievement in competition with
other groups or benefits gained, such as high wage payments from a group bonus incentive
scheme.
External threat
Cohesiveness may be enhanced by members co-operating with one another when faced with
a common external threat, such as changes in their method of work or the appointment of
a new manager. Even if the threat is subsequently removed, the group may continue to have
a greater degree of cohesiveness than before the threat arose. Conflict between groups will
also tend to increase the cohesiveness of each group and the boundaries of the group become
drawn more clearly.
leadership, individual roles and responsibilities and codes of conduct. There is likely to
be considerable anxiety as members attempt to create an impression, test each other and
establish their personal identity within the group.
● Stage 2 – storming. As members of the group get to know each other better they will put
forward their views more openly and forcefully. Disagreements will be expressed and chal-
lenges offered on the nature of the task and arrangements made in the earlier stage of devel-
opment. This may lead to conflict and hostility. The storming stage is important because, if
successful, there will be discussions on reforming arrangements for the working and opera-
tion of the group, and agreement on more meaningful structures and procedures.
● Stage 3 – norming. As conflict and hostility start to be controlled, members of the group
will establish guidelines and standards and develop their own norms of acceptable behav-
iour. The norming stage is important in establishing the need for members to co-operate in
order to plan, agree standards of performance and fulfil the purpose of the group.
● Stage 4 – performing. When the group has progressed successfully through the three earlier
stages of development it will have created structure and cohesiveness to work effectively as
a team. At this stage the group can concentrate on the attainment of its purpose and per-
formance of the common task is likely to be at its most effective.
● Stage 5 – adjourning. This refers to the adjourning or disbanding of the group because
of, for example, completion of the task, members leaving the organisation or moving on
to other tasks. Some members may feel a compelling sense of loss at the end of a major
or lengthy group project and their return to independence is characterised by sadness and
anxiety. Managers may need to prepare for future group tasks and engendering team effort.
Another writer suggests that new groups go through the following five stages:
● the polite stage;
● the why are we here, what are we doing stage;
● the power stage, which dominant person will emerge;
● the constructive stage when sharing begins; and
● the unity stage – this often takes weeks, eating together, talking together.20
creativity or innovation, and defeated the majority of those teams who passed through the
weak barrier. The two-barrier model provides a starting point for exploring the impact and
influence of a team leader on the performance of teams. Rickards and Moger identified seven
factors through which a leader might influence effective team development:
● building a platform of understanding;
● creating a shared vision;
● providing a creative climate;
● showing a commitment to idea ownership;
● resilience to setbacks;
● developing networking skills;
● learning from experience.21
suggest that, even without realising it, we tend usually to favour the groupings we belong to
more than denigrate out-groups. Successful inter-group bias enhances self-esteem.26 (See also
the discussion on social exchange theory in Chapter 1 and possible effects on group member-
ship, norms and control.)
However, as Brooks points out, as teams operate at the higher order of group dynamics this
list is arguably more reflective of ‘effective work teams rather than work groups and this is how
it should be – these are teams not groups’.27
Musical ensembles make for an interesting study. Individual members may be brilliant
soloists and often noted for their temperament, but their performance is as much about the
total blend and working noticeably well together as about musical ability. By comparison, it is
noticeable how managers of sporting teams often deliberately introduce new players, even to
a successful team, in order to further increase competition or rivalry for places, with the hope
of achieving even greater success for the team as a whole.
Inter-group conflict
Strong, cohesive groups may develop a critical or even hostile attitude towards people outside
the group or members of other groups. Groups may also compete against each other in a
non-productive manner. This can be the case, for example, when group cohesiveness is based
on common status, qualifications, technical expertise or professional standing. As a result,
resentment and inter-group conflict may arise to the detriment of the organisation as a whole.
(Recall the discussion on social identity theory, above.) In order to help prevent, or overcome,
unconstructive inter-group conflict, the manager should attempt to stimulate a high level of
communication and interaction between groups.
Yet, inter-group rivalry may be deliberately encouraged as a means of building stronger
within-group cohesiveness. The idea is that a competitive element may help to promote unity
within a group. However, inter-group rivalry and competition need to be handled carefully
Virtual teams
The combination of increasing globalisation, competition and widespread developments in
ICT has given greater emphasis to the opportunities for, and need of, virtual teams. Instead
of involving face-to-face proximity, virtual teams are a collection of people who are geo-
graphically separated but still need to work together closely. The primary interaction among
members is by some electronic information and communication process. This enables organ-
isations to function away from traditional working hours and the physical availability of
staff. Computer-based information systems and increased wireless connectivity further the
opportunities for virtual working. By their very nature, virtual teams are likely to be largely
self-managed.
According to Hall, the virtual team is a potential future compromise between fully fledged
teams and well-managed groups.
I am watching the rise of this idea with interest but am sceptical that it will actually create a
‘third way’. Real teams can only be forged in the crucible of personal interaction: videocon-
ferences and Net communications are still poor substitutes for this. Of course, once a team
has formed it can use these media, as members will know each other well, but that’s not the
important bit. It’s the forming, norming and storming that make a team.29
Virtual teams may lead to an increase in productivity through a reduction in commute time
and greater personal flexibility. Organisations are able to establish a greater worldwide pres-
ence. Virtual teams can comprise people with different types of knowledge, help to reduce
discrimination and provide wider employment opportunities. A potential difficulty is main-
taining effective communications, bearing in mind the lack of body language and non-verbal
communication (discussed in Chapter 6). Virtual teams demand good leadership and manage-
ment, including competence in ICT. Virtual working is not always to the initial liking of all
people and it is important to have a remote working strategy.
Some people seem clearly to welcome virtual working with its feeling of autonomy, free-
dom from distractions and interruptions and less time and stress on commuting. However,
despite the increase in remote working, it does not appeal to everyone. Not everyone enjoys
working on their own and they miss group membership, social structure, contact and interac-
tion. They may feel ignored by the organisation and experience an increasing feeling of isola-
tion. For some people, trust is difficult when they cannot see the other person. Without direct
personal interaction some people find it difficult to motivate themselves. A sense of discipline
and self-motivation is important for effective remote working.
Garrett maintains that collaborating with other people in different cities or countries is not
always a successful arrangement and lists the following suggestions for helping to organise the
virtual team:
● Say hello – The most successful teams spend time during their formation period face to
face, getting to know each other.
● Build trust – This holds the team together so that you can depend on other team members
and feel comfortable opening up to them.
● Recruit with care – People who can communicate in the right way at the right time are more
likely to be successful in virtual teams.
● Do not rely on email – The written word is easily misunderstood so supplement its use with
other forms of communication.
● Encourage dissent – Without face-to-face meetings people become reluctant to speak out,
but a healthy organisation needs people to speak out and challenge leaders and each other.
● Use technology thoughtfully – Used badly, sophisticated tools can be a disaster, and people
need to be trained to use the technology, not simply have it imposed on them.
● Measure outcomes – Focus on the outcomes rather than time management, find a personal
way to appraise performance, rather than email, and hold regular chats with members.
● Do say – ‘By proactively creating virtual teams we can go where talent is, extend our reach
and work more efficiently.’
● Do not say – ‘We call them a virtual team because they’re not quite the real thing.’31
Cultural diversity
One reason for the growth in virtual teams is increasing globalisation and team members
working and living in different countries. This gives rise to potential difficulties of cultural
diversity. As Francesco and Gold point out:
The more culturally diverse the members, the more difficult it is to manage a virtual team.
Cultural diversity, which will be increasingly common, adds to the complexity of managing
virtual teams because different values, customs, and traditions require more leadership under
conditions that reduce the ability to use direct leadership.32
And, according to Murray, although virtual working presents some unexpected benefits, if
managing diversity in the workplace is a tough task for business leaders, the challenges of
keeping executives from different backgrounds working together in various parts of the world
is even more difficult. Virtual working does not eradicate the sort of cultural misunderstand-
ings that can arise in a face-to-face situation.
Cultural or behavioural differences that can manifest themselves in face-to-face working sit-
uations can be exacerbated in virtual team working, particularly when the group has mem-
bers from different backgrounds.33
Hazlehurst points out that the rise of the virtual organisation is not a universal development.
In emerging economies, the office is still a novelty and young people are clamouring to work in
them. It may seem hard to understand to westerners with generations of travel-weary commuters
in their family tree, but if you are the first person in your family to move from a village to a city, an
office job is alive with exciting possibilities, as well as being a potent symbol of personal success.34
From a slightly different perspective Heifetz and Laurie (1997) propose six guid-
ing principles of post-heroic leadership, and they conclude that leadership is about
learning and that the idea of having a vision and aligning people to this is bankrupt.
The idea of one leader at the top creating major changes in order to solve a one-off
challenge is no longer appropriate, as organisations now face a constant stream of
adaptive challenges, and leadership is required of many in the organisation, not just
one person at the top. They argue that employees should be allowed to identify and
solve problems themselves and learn to take responsibility. The role of the leader is
to develop collective self-confidence. As Grint (1997) puts it, ‘the apparent devolve-
ment (or desertion – depending on your perspective) of responsibility has become the
new standard in contemporary models of leadership’ (p. 13). For further discussion
on the devolution of responsibility see case 14.1 on the website.
These visions of leadership are very attractive but they do require a dramatic
change in thinking for both leaders and followers. For leaders there is the risk of
giving away power, learning to trust employees, developing new skills, developing a
different perspective of their role and overriding self-interest. For followers there is
the challenge of taking responsibility – which some may welcome, but others shun.
Yet, if sustained competitive advantage is based on human capital and collective
intelligence, it is difficult to relegate this perspective to ‘just an ideal’.
While empowering leaders have been shown to fit with the current climate we may
sometimes need heroic leaders. Kets de Vries (2003) makes the point that heroic
leadership will never die as change makes people anxious and we need heroic
leaders to calm them down, but since no one can live up to the expectations of
heroic leaders, they will eventually become a disappointment. We conclude with
the thought that there is no one best way – different leaders and different leader
behaviours are needed at different times. For an example of a mixed approach to
leadership see case 14.2 on the website about Tim Smit of the Eden Project.
All leadership models are based on the assumption that one person can motivate
another to act, and we have looked at different explanations of how leaders may do
this – based on their traits, their employment of the one best leadership style or their
use of a style which matches (in some ways) the needs of their followers, and is
responsive (in some ways) to the context. We have also explained how the leader
may be reconceptualised as heroic (transformational leader) and as empowering or
post-heroic.
Some interconnections can be made between these theories and motivation
theories. It is not our purpose here to recount any motivation theories in detail (for
this see texts such as Buchanan and Huczynski 1997; Mullins 1999; Fulop and
Linstead 1999; or Hollyforde and Whiddett 2002). Below we identify some of the
key concepts addressed in motivation theories and suggest which leadership per-
spectives tap into these concepts:
312
HRM_C14.qxd 10/22/04 2:29 PM Page 313
the process of motivation the extent to which the individual feels they can real-
istically achieve the target will have an influence on whether they are motivated
even to try. In respect of transformational leadership it is argued that followers
can be inspired to achieve beyond the normal, partly because the leader has high
expectations of the followers and in addition the leader expresses the belief that
the followers are capable of achieving these great things. From a different per-
spective the post-heroic leader concept is based on trusting organisation members
to play their part, trusting them with information and expecting them to use this
wisely for the good of the organisation.
• Social needs are important. Maslow (1943), Mayo (1953) and McClelland
(1971), among others, highlight the need for affiliation as a motivational fac-
tor. Some leadership models specifically respond to this, for example Blake and
Mouton (1964) (‘one best style’ theory), Hersey and Blanchard (1988) and Fielder
(1967) (contingency theory) all use ‘concern for people’ in some form as one of the
key aspects of their leadership models. The concept of post-heroic leadership con-
cerns involving those who may previously have been excluded, and concerns the
impact of their leadership on individuals. In addition this perspective concentrates
on the importance of learning and acting collectively.
• Importance of the work itself. Maslow (1943), Herzberg (1968), and Hackman
and Oldham (1976), for example, all underline the way in which individuals are
motivated to seek and may achieve satisfaction through their jobs. Herzberg, for
example, identifies how opportunities for achievement, recognition, responsibil-
ity, autonomy, challenging tasks and opportunities for development may all be
motivational. In some ways, Hersey and Blanchard’s (1988) model addresses
these needs in their ‘delegation’ style. In the post-heroic model many people in the
organisation need to be involved in meeting adaptive challenges, in working out
solutions and in contributing to vision building and many need to take on the
responsibility of leadership. This is very different from the transformational lead-
ership model in which the leader at the top of the organisation is seen to have all
the responsibility.
• Recognising different people are motivated by different things. Expectancy the-
ory, previously mentioned, also identifies that different individuals value different
things and hence have different motivational needs. In the process of motivation,
only those things that the individual values will spur them to act. Contingency
models of leadership take this on board to some extent. From a different perspect-
ive the transformational leader develops an interpretation of the world, or nar-
rative, that plays to the followers’ needs. However, while post-heroic leadership
identifies that different people may play a different part, there is an assumption
that all will be prepared to be involved, to share information and to develop them-
selves in line with the needs of the organisation.
• Social influences on motivation. Recent work in the area of motivation suggests
that motivations are socially or culturally determined, and to a limited extent the
transformational leader ties into this as they reinterpret the world for their
followers.
In spite of the links between leadership and motivation theories, there are many
aspects of motivation that the leadership theories ignore. For example, some people
have less internal energy and drive than others and less need for growth. Also,
313
HRM_C14.qxd 10/22/04 2:29 PM Page 314
individuals with high levels of energy and drive may satisfy these outside the work
environment. While we may try to motivate people externally the greatest power
for motivation comes from within and is therefore under the control of the indi-
vidual rather than another. The best we can say is that leaders can enhance fol-
lowers’ motivation by the way they treat them, and at worst leaders may neutralise
the motivational energy in their followers. There will always be some factors on
which leaders have no impact whatsoever.
SUMMARY PROPOSITIONS
14.1 Leadership is a process where one person influences a group of others to achieve
group or organisational goals – leadership is thus about motivation.
14.2 The trait model of leadership, although often discredited, continues to play a part in
our understanding of leadership.
14.3 Behavioural models are more helpful than earlier models as they concentrate on
what leaders do rather than on what they are.
14.4 Some behavioural models offer a ‘one best way’ of leadership, but more sophistic-
ated models take account of contingency factors such as maturity of followers and
the nature of the task.
14.5 Models of transformational leadership treat the leader as a hero who can (single-
handedly) turn the organisation around and deliver it from a crisis.
14.6 Empowering and post-heroic leadership models conceptualise the leader as teacher
and facilitator, who involves many in the leadership task.
14.7 While there are many ways in which leadership theories tap into concepts of moti-
vation, at best leaders may enhance the motivation of their followers and at worst
they may neutralise it.
2 Consider the four types of charismatic leader identified by Steyrer (1998): hero, father
figure, missionary and saviour. Discuss the ways in which the types of leader are similar or
different.
FURTHER READING
IDS (2003) IDS Studies: Leadership Development, No. 753. London: Incomes Data Services
A useful book outlining the work of five case study organisations, in terms of their conception
of leadership, what prompted their leadership development programmes and an outline of the
programmes themselves. The case organisations are the Dixons group, the Inland Revenue,
Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Portsmouth City Council and Skipton Building Society.
314
170 Part 3 Factors Affecting Employee Behaviour
Establish
goal
Identify Take
need action
Attain
goal
research established that there were two factors that meant that he had considerable influence on the job
affected feelings of satisfaction or dissatisfaction. enrichment movement, which sought to design jobs
Motivating factors or ‘satisfiers’ relate to the job in a way that would maximize the opportunities
content and consist of the need for achievement, the to obtain intrinsic satisfaction from work and
interest of the work, responsibility and opportunities thus improve the quality of working life. Herzberg
for advancement. These needs are the intrinsic famously remarked that if you want people to do
motivators. He summed this up in the phrase ‘moti- a good job then give them a good job to do (quoted
vation by the work itself’. by Dowling, 1971).
Hygiene factors relate to the job context, includ-
ing such things as pay and working conditions. Self-determination theory
‘Hygiene’ is used in the medical use of the term,
As formulated by Deci and Ryan (2000) this theory
meaning preventative and environmental. In them-
states that individuals are motivated by the need
selves hygiene factors neither satisfy nor motivate
to achieve three fundamental goals: striving for
and they serve primarily to prevent job dissatis-
competence, autonomy and relatedness.
faction, while having little effect on positive job
attitudes. Pay is not a satisfier but if it is inadequate
or inequitable it can cause dissatisfaction. However, Comment on content theories
its provision does not provide lasting satisfaction. Shields (2007: 74) observed that content theories
Herzberg’s two-factor theory in effect identifies share some common shortcomings. His criticisms
needs but it has been attacked by, for example, were that they incorrectly assume:
Opsahl and Dunnette (1966). The research method ●● the existence of a universally applicable set
has been criticized because no attempt was made to of human needs;
measure the relationship between satisfaction and
●● that according to Maslow (1954), needs
performance. It has been claimed that the two-factor
conform to a simple ordered hierarchy of
nature of the theory is an inevitable result of the
need importance, when in reality, needs seem
questioning method used by the interviewers. It has
to operate in a more flexible, less ordered
also been suggested that wide and unwarranted in-
and predictable way;
ferences have been drawn from small and specialized
samples and that there is no evidence to suggest that ●● that the link between needs and behaviours
the satisfiers do improve productivity. The under- is direct and automatic, rather than mediated
pinning assumption that everyone has the same needs by human consciousness, values and choice.
is invalid. Denise Rousseau (2006: 263) in her pres- In addition, he pointed out that content theories
idential address to the US Academy of Management ‘underestimate the motivational potency of extrinsic
summed up these views as follows: ‘Herzberg’s long rewards, including financial rewards’.
discredited two-factor theory is typically included
in the motivation section of management textbooks,
despite the fact that it was discredited as an artefact
Process theory
of method bias over thirty years ago.’ In process theory, the emphasis is on the psycho-
In spite of these objections, the Herzberg two- logical or mental processes and forces that affect
factor theory continues to thrive; partly because motivation, as well as on basic needs. It is also
it is easy to understand and seems to be based on known as cognitive theory because it refers to
real-life rather than academic abstractions, and people’s perceptions of their working environment
partly because it convincingly emphasizes the and the ways in which they interpret and under-
positive value of the intrinsic motivating factors stand it. The main process theories are concerned
and highlights the need to consider both financial with reinforcement, expectancy, goals, equity, and
and non-financial factors when developing reward cognitive evaluation.
systems. It is also in accord with a fundamental
belief in the dignity of labour and the Protestant Reinforcement theory
ethic – that work is good in itself. Herzberg’s This is the oldest and least complex of the process
strength as a proselytizer rather than a researcher theories. It is based on ‘the law of effect’ as formulated
174 Part 3 Factors Affecting Employee Behaviour
by Thorndike (1911), which states that over time frequently presented with new situations – a change
people learn about the relationships between their in job, payment system, or working conditions
actions and the consequences of them and this imposed by management – where past experience
understanding guides their future behaviour. In is an inadequate guide to the implications of the
other words, if they believe that something has change. In these circumstances, motivation may be
worked previously then they will do it again. It was reduced.
later developed by Hull (1943, 1951). Motivation is only likely when a clearly perceived
Skinner (1953) and others later built on these and usable relationship exists between performance
principles with the notion of ‘operant conditioning’, and outcome, and the outcome is seen as a means
which was influenced by the work of Pavlov and his of satisfying needs. This explains why extrinsic
salivating dogs. As Shields (2007: 76) put it: ‘Positive financial motivation – for example, an incentive or
reinforcement of desired behaviour elicits more of bonus scheme – works only if the link (line of sight)
the same; punishment of undesired behaviour between effort and reward is clear and the value of
(negative reinforcement) elicits less of the same.’ the reward is worth the effort. It also explains why
Reinforcement models continue to thrive today as intrinsic motivation arising from the work itself
explanatory vehicles for understanding work moti- can be more powerful than extrinsic motivation.
vation and job performance, and as a justification Intrinsic motivation outcomes are more under the
of performance pay. control of individuals, who can place greater reliance
But reinforcement theory can be criticized for on their past experiences to indicate the extent to
taking an unduly mechanistic view of human nature. which positive and advantageous results are likely
It implies that people can be motivated by treating to be obtained by their behaviour.
them as machines – by pulling levers. In assuming This theory was developed by Porter and Lawler
that the present choices of individuals are based on (1968) into a model shown in Figure 13.2, which
an understanding of the outcomes of their past follows Vroom’s ideas by suggesting that there are
choices, reinforcement theory ignores the existing two factors determining the effort that people put
context in which choices are made. In addition, into their jobs: first, the value of the rewards to indi-
motivational theories based on the principle of rein- viduals in so far as they satisfy their needs for security,
forcement pay insufficient attention to the influence social esteem, autonomy and self-actualization;
of expectations – no indication is given of how to second, the probability that rewards depend on
distinguish in advance which outcomes would effort, as perceived by individuals – in other words,
strengthen responses and which would weaken their expectations about the relationships between
them. Above all, they are limited because they imply, effort and reward. Thus, the greater the value of a
in Allport’s (1954) vivid phrase, a hedonism of the set of awards and the higher the probability that
past. receiving each of these rewards depends upon effort,
the greater the effort that will be put forth in a given
situation.
Expectancy theory But, as Porter and Lawler emphasized, mere effort
Expectancy theory states that motivation will be is not enough. It has to be effective effort if it is to
high when people know what they have to do in produce the desired performance. The two variables
order to get a reward, expect that they will be able additional to effort that affect task achievement are:
to get the reward and expect that the reward will be 1) ability – individual characteristics such as intel-
worthwhile. ligence, knowledge, skills; 2) role perceptions –
The concept of expectancy was originally con- what the individual wants to do or thinks they are
tained in the valency-instrumentality-expectancy required to do. These are good from the viewpoint
(VIE) theory that was formulated by Vroom (1964). of the organization if they correspond with what
Valency stands for value; instrumentality is the it thinks the individual ought to be doing. They are
belief that if we do one thing it will lead to another; poor if the views of the individual and the organiza-
and expectancy is the probability that action or tion do not coincide.
effort will lead to an outcome. Alongside goal theory (see below), expectancy
The strength of expectations may be based on past theory has become the most influential motivation
experiences (reinforcement), but individuals are theory, particularly as it affects performance and
Chapter 13 Motivation 175
Effort Performance
Probability that
Role
reward depend
expectations
upon effort
reward management. But reservations have been ●● may be able to evaluate the extrinsic rewards
expressed about it. House et al (1974) remarked they expect but may find it difficult to
that: ‘Evidence for the validity of the theory is evaluate the possibility of achieving intrinsic
very mixed.’ They also established that there were rewards;
a number of variables affecting expectations that ●● may find it difficult to distinguish the benefits
make it difficult to predict how they function. of one possible outcome from another.
These are:
They concluded that: ‘Expectancy theory can account
●● Leadership behaviour – the function of the for some of the variations in work effort but far less
leader in clarifying expectations, guiding, than normally attributed to it’ (ibid 386).
supporting and rewarding subordinates. Shields (2007: 80) commented that a problem
●● Individual characteristics – the subjects’ with expectancy theory is that it assumes that
perception of their ability to perform the ‘behaviour is rational and premeditated when we
required task. know that much workplace behaviour is impulsive
●● Nature of the task – whether accomplishing and emotional’.
the task provides the necessary However, in spite of these objections, the simple
reinforcements and rewards. message of expectancy theory – that people will be
motivated if they expect that their behaviour will
●● The practices of the organization – its produce a worthwhile reward – is compelling. And
reward and control systems and how it it provides a useful tool to assess the effectiveness of
functions. motivating devices such as performance-related pay.
Research conducted by Behling and Starke (1973)
established that individuals: Goal theory
Goal theory as developed by Latham and Locke
●● make crucial personal decisions without
(1979) following their research states that motivation
clearly understanding the consequences;
and performance are higher when individuals are
●● do not in practice consistently evaluate their set specific goals, when goals are demanding but
order of preference for alternative actions; accepted, and when there is feedback on performance.
●● have to assign two values when making a Goals must be clearly defined. Participation in goal
decision – its desirability and its achievability setting is important as a means of getting agreement
– but they tend to be influenced mainly by to the setting of demanding goals. Feedback is vital
desirability – they let their tastes influence in maintaining motivation, particularly towards the
their beliefs; achievement of even higher goals.
176 Part 3 Factors Affecting Employee Behaviour
However, the universality of goal theory has feedback, when used to convey to people a sense
been questioned. For example, Pintrich (2000) noted of appreciation for work well done, will tend to be
that people have different goals in different circum- experienced informationally and will maintain or
stances and that it is hard to justify the assumption enhance intrinsic motivation. But when they are used
that goals are always accessible and conscious. And to motivate people, they will be experienced con-
Harackiewicz et al (2002) warned that goals are trollingly and will undermine intrinsic motivation.’
only effective when they are consistent with and Deci et al (1999) followed up this research by
match the general context in which they are pursued. carrying out a meta-analysis of 128 experiments on
But support for goal theory was provided by rewards and intrinsic motivation to establish the
Bandura and Cervone (1983) who emphasized the extent to which intrinsic motivation was under-
importance of self-efficacy (a belief in one’s ability mined by rewards. The results of the study indicated
to accomplish goals). that for high-interest tasks, rewards had significant
negative effects on what the researchers called ‘free-
Equity theory choice measures’, which included the time spent on
the task after the reward was removed.
Equity theory, as defined by Adams (1965), is con- But as noted by Gerhart and Rynes (2003: 52):
cerned with the perceptions people have about ‘The vast majority of research on this theory has
how they are being treated as compared with others. been performed in school rather than work settings,
He proposed that employees assess the fairness or often with elementary school-aged children.’ But
otherwise of their rewards (outcomes) in relation to that did not stop other commentators assuming
their effort or qualifications (inputs) and that they that the results were equally significant for working
do this by comparing their own input/output ratio adults. It is interesting to note that research in in-
against that of other individuals. If the input/output dustry conducted by Deci and Ryan (1985), while it
ratio is perceived to be unfavourable, they will feel found that financial incentives did decrease intrinsic
that there is reward inequity. motivation in high-control organizational cultures,
Equity theory explains only one aspect of the pro also established that in organizations with the
cesses of motivation and job satisfaction, although opposite high-involvement culture, intrinsic and ex-
it may be significant in terms of morale and, possibly, trinsic motivation were both increased by monetary
of performance. incentives. Context is all important. Moreover, a
meta-analysis of 145 studies conducted by Cameron
Social learning theory et al (2001) led to the conclusion that rewards do
Social learning theory as developed by Bandura not inevitably have negative effects on intrinsic
(1977) combines aspects of both reinforcement and motivation.
expectancy theory. It recognizes the significance of
the basic behavioural concept of reinforcement Purposeful work behaviour
as a determinant of future behaviour but also A more recent integrated motivation theory formu-
emphasizes the importance of internal psychological lated by Barrick and Mount (2013) focused on the
factors, especially expectancies about the value of impact on motivation of individual factors, such as
goals and the individual’s ability to reach them. personality and ability, and situational factors, such
The term ‘reciprocal determinism’ is used to denote as job characteristics. The motivation to engage in
the concept that while the situation will affect purposeful work behaviour depends on both these
individual behaviour individuals will simultaneously factors.
influence the situation.
Comment on process theories
Cognitive evaluation theory Process theories are not based on suspect assump-
Cognitive evaluation theory contends that the use tions about the universality of needs, as are content
of extrinsic rewards may destroy the intrinsic moti- theories. Process theories emphasize the importance
vation that flows from inherent job interest. It was of individual decision-making on work behaviour.
formulated by Deci and Ryan (1985). Referring As pointed out by Shields (2007: 85) They ‘ac-
to their research, they stated that: ‘Rewards, like knowledge the importance of social and job context
Chapter 13 Motivation 177
Two-factor model Two groups of factors affect job The research methodology has
Herzberg (1957, satisfaction: 1) those intrinsic been strongly criticized (it does
1966) to the work itself; 2) those not support the existence of two
extrinsic to the job such as pay factors) and the underpinning
and working conditions. The assumption that everyone has
factors that affect positive the same needs is invalid. But it
feelings (the motivating factors) has influenced approaches to job
are quite different from those design (job enrichment) and it
that affect negative feelings supports the proposition that
(the hygiene factors). reward systems should provide
for both financial and non-financial
rewards.
based on the belief that productivity could be in- the work itself. However, it must be re-emphasized
creased by making workers more satisfied, primarily that different people have different needs and
through pleasant and supportive supervision and by wants. Some will be much more motivated by
meeting their social needs. But research by Katz money than others. What cannot be assumed is that
et al (1950) and Katz et al (1951) found that the money motivates everyone in the same way and to
levels of satisfaction with pay, job status or fellow the same extent. Thus it is naive to think that the
workers in high productivity units were no different introduction of a performance-related pay scheme
to those in low productivity units. will miraculously transform everyone overnight
Meta-analysis by Brayfield and Crocket (1955) of into well-motivated, high-performing individuals.
a number of studies concluded that there was little Nevertheless, money is a powerful force because
evidence of any simple or appreciable relationship it is linked directly or indirectly to the satisfaction of
between satisfaction and performance. A later review many needs. Money may in itself have no intrinsic
of research by Vroom (1964) found that the median meaning, but it acquires significant motivating
correlation between job satisfaction and job per- power because it comes to symbolize so many intan-
formance for all these studies was only 0.14, which gible goals. It acts as a symbol in different ways for
is not high enough to suggest any marked relation- different people, and for the same person at different
ship between them. Spector (1997) came to the times.
same conclusion. Indeed, it can be argued that it is But do financial incentives motivate people? The
not increases in satisfaction that produce improved answer is yes, for those people who are strongly
performance but improved performance that in- motivated by money and whose expectations are
creases satisfaction. This was confirmed by data on that they will receive a worthwhile financial reward.
the link between job satisfaction and performance But less confident employees may not respond to
for 177 store managers, analysed by Christen et al incentives that they do not expect to achieve. It can
(2006). It was established that store managers’ per- also be argued that extrinsic rewards may erode
formance increased their job satisfaction but that intrinsic interest – people who work just for money
job satisfaction had no impact on job performance. could find their tasks less pleasurable and may not,
therefore, do them so well. What we do know is
that a multiplicity of factors is involved in perform-
ance improvements and many of those factors are
Motivation and money interdependent.
Money can therefore provide positive motivation
Money, in the form of pay or some other sort of in the right circumstances not only because people
remuneration, is regarded by many people as the need and want money but also because it serves as
most obvious extrinsic reward. Money seems to a highly tangible means of recognition. But badly
provide the carrot that most people want. designed and managed pay systems can demotivate.
Doubts were cast on the effectiveness of money Another researcher in this area was Jaques (1961),
by Herzberg (1968), which although unsupported who emphasized the need for such systems to be
by his research have some degree of face validity. perceived as being fair and equitable. In other words,
He claimed that while the lack of money can cause the reward should be clearly related to effort or level
dissatisfaction, its provision does not result in lasting of responsibility and people should not receive less
satisfaction. There is something in this, especially money than they deserve compared with their fellow
for people on fixed salaries or rates of pay who do workers. Jaques called this the ‘felt-fair’ principle.
not benefit directly from an incentive scheme. They
may feel good when they get an increase; apart
from the extra money, it is a highly tangible form
of recognition and an effective means of helping Motivation strategies
people to feel that they are valued. But this feeling
of euphoria can rapidly die away. Other causes of Motivation strategies aim to create a working envir
dissatisfaction from Herzberg’s list of hygiene factors, onment and to develop policies and practices that
such as working conditions or the quality of man- will provide for higher levels of performance from
agement, can loom larger in some people’s minds employees. The factors affecting them and the HR
when they fail to get the satisfaction they need from contribution are summarized in Table 13.2.
Chapter 13 Motivation 181
The complexity of the process of motivation Avoid the trap of developing or supporting strategies
means that simplistic approaches based on that offer prescriptions for motivation based on a
instrumentality or needs theory are unlikely simplistic view of the process or fail to recognize
to be successful. individual differences.
Extrinsic motivators such as incentive pay Develop total reward systems that provide
can have an immediate and powerful effect, opportunities for both financial and non-financial
but it will not necessarily last long. The rewards to recognize achievements. Bear in mind,
intrinsic motivators, which are concerned however, that financial rewards systems are not
with the ‘quality of working life’ (a phrase necessarily appropriate and the lessons of
and movement that emerged from this expectancy, goal and equity theory need to be taken
concept), are likely to have a deeper and into account in designing and operating them.
longer-term effect because they are inherent Pay particular attention to recognition as a means of
in individuals and the work they do and not motivation.
imposed from outside in such forms as Develop intrinsic motivation by paying attention to
performance-related pay. job design, ensuring that managers are aware of its
importance and their role in designing intrinsically
motivating jobs.
Some people will be much more motivated Avoid the introduction of a performance-related
by money than others. It cannot be assumed pay scheme in the belief that it will miraculously
that money motivates everyone in the same transform everyone overnight into well-motivated,
way and to the same extent. high-performing individuals.
The need for work that provides people with Advise on processes for the design of jobs that take
the means to achieve their goals, a account of the factors affecting the motivation to
reasonable degree of autonomy, and scope work, providing for job enrichment in the shape of
for the use of skills and competences. variety, decision-making responsibility and as much
control as possible in carrying out the work.
The need for the opportunity to grow by Provide facilities and opportunities for learning
developing abilities and careers. through such means as personal development
planning processes as well as more formal training.
Develop career planning processes.
182 Part 3 Factors Affecting Employee Behaviour
The cultural environment of the organization Advise on the development of a culture that
in the shape of its values and norms will supports processes of valuing and rewarding
influence the impact of any attempts to employees.
motivate people by direct or indirect means.
Achievement motivation is important for Pay attention to job design to ensure that people are
managers and those who aspire to greater given the scope to achieve.
responsibility. Develop talent management processes to provide
people with opportunities to achieve and
performance management processes to provide
them with feedback on how well they are achieving
and what they must do to achieve more.
The process of motivation most significant theories are those concerned with
expectancy, goal setting, equity and cognitive
Motivation is goal-directed behaviour. People are evaluation, which are classified as process or
motivated when they expect that a course of action cognitive theories.
is likely to lead to the attainment of a goal and a valued
reward – one that satisfies their needs and wants.
Motivation strategies
Types of motivation Motivation strategies aim to create a working
environment and to develop policies and practices
The two basic types are intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.
that will provide for higher levels of performance from
employees. They include the design of intrinsically
Motivation theories motivating jobs and leadership development
There are a number of motivation theories that, in programmes and the development of total reward
the main, are complementary to one another. The systems and performance management processes.
Using these overall goals, marketers combine the elements of the promotional mix into
promotion a coordinated plan. This promotional plan defines the promotional strategy, which then
Communication by marketers that becomes an integral part of the overall marketing strategy for reaching the target market.
informs, persuades, and reminds
potential buyers of a product in The main function of a marketer’s promotional strategy is to convince target
order to influence an opinion or customers that the goods and services offered provide a competitive advantage over the
elicit a response. competition. A competitive advantage is the set of unique features of a company and
promotional strategy its products that are perceived by the target market as significant and superior to the
A plan for the optimal use of the competition. Such features can include high product quality, rapid delivery, low prices,
elements of promotion: advertising, excellent service, or a feature not offered by the competition. For example, fast-food
public relations, personal selling,
and sales promotion. restaurant Subway promises fresh sandwiches that are better for you than a hamburger
or pizza. Subway effectively communicates its competitive advantage through advertis-
competitive advantage ing featuring longtime “spokes-eater” Jared Fogle, who lost weight by eating at Subway
One or more unique aspects of
an organization that cause target every day.1 Thus, promotion is a vital part of the marketing mix, informing consumers
consumers to patronize that firm of a product’s benefits and thereby positioning the product in the marketplace.
rather than competitors.
communication
The process by which we
exchange or share meanings 2
through a common set of symbols.
MARKETING COMMUNICATION
Promotional strategy is closely related to the process of communication. As humans, we
assign meaning to feelings, ideas, facts, attitudes, and emotions. Communication is the
process by which we exchange or share meanings through a common set of symbols. When
a company develops a new product, changes an old one, or simply tries to increase sales
CHAPTER 16
to potential customers. Marketers communicate information about the
firm and its products to the target market and various publics through its
promotion programs. When Sara Lee Corp. decided to reinvigorate its
legacy brand, Kiwi shoe polish, it began with communication: It asked
people about their shoe care needs. After interviewing 3,500 people
across eight countries, it found out that people cared more about fresh,
© AP PHOTO/CHRIS CARLSON
the other person’s reaction and can respond almost immediately. not only knowledge of basic marketing principles,
A salesperson speaking directly with a client is an example of an but also an understanding of ground-level tactics on
interpersonal marketing communication. Mass communication involves everything from segmentation and database man-
agement to analytics, social networking, and online
communicating a concept or message to large audiences. A great deal of
communities.
marketing communication is directed to consumers as a whole, usually
through a mass medium such as television, newspapers, or the Internet.
When a company advertises, it generally does not personally know the
people with whom it is trying to communicate. Furthermore, the company is unable to
respond immediately to consumers’ reactions to its message. Instead, the marketing manager
must wait to see whether people are reacting positively or negatively to the mass-communi-
cated promotion. Any clutter from competitors’ messages or other distractions in the environ-
ment can reduce the effectiveness of the mass-communication effort.
The Sender and Encoding The sender is the originator of the message in the com-
munication process. In an interpersonal conversation, the sender may be a parent, a
friend, or a salesperson. For an advertisement or press release, the sender is the com-
interpersonal communication
pany or organization itself. For example, the Swedish brand Absolut Vodka launched Direct, face-to-face communication
a marketing campaign using the theme “In an Absolut World.” At the outset, the between two or more people.
objective of the campaign was to increase Absolut’s market share in the crowded and
mass communication
increasingly competitive U.S. vodka market. To appeal to this market, Absolut had to The communication of a concept or
differentiate its message from the “rational benefits” (such as best taste or smooth feel) message to large audiences.
being claimed by so many of the upstarts in the vodka category. Absolut changed its
sender
near-legendary super-premium brand strategy—a print campaign pairing the iconic The originator of the message in the
shape of its bottle with equally iconic art figures—to a campaign that would appeal communication process.
to the “emotional benefits” of the brand.4 Thus, Absolute launched a new campaign
527
EXHIBIT 16.2
Communication Process Noise
• Other advertisements
• News articles
• Other store displays
528
the noise level is high and the reception level is low. For example, competing network
CHAPTER 16
advertisements, other entertainment option advertisements, or other programming on
the network itself might hamper reception of the “Absolut World” advertising campaign
message. Transmission can also be hindered by situational factors: physical surroundings
such as light, sound, location, and weather; the presence of other people; or the tempo-
rary moods consumers might bring to the situation. Mass communication may not even
reach all the right consumers. Some members of the target audience were likely watch-
The Receiver and Decoding Marketers communicate their message through a channel
to customers, or receivers, who will decode the message. Decoding is the interpretation
of the language and symbols sent by the source through a channel. Common under-
standing between two communicators, or a common frame of reference, is required for
effective communication. Therefore, marketing managers must ensure a proper match
between the message to be conveyed and the target market’s attitudes and ideas.
Even though a message has been received, it will not necessarily be properly
decoded—or even seen, viewed, or heard—because of selective exposure, distortion,
and retention. (Refer to Chapter 6.) Even when people receive a message, they tend
to manipulate, alter, and modify it to reflect their own biases, needs, knowledge, and
culture. Differences in age, social class, education, culture, and ethnicity can lead to
miscommunication, for example. Further, because people don’t always listen or read
carefully, they can easily misinterpret what is said or written. In fact, researchers have
found that consumers misunderstand a large proportion of both printed and televised
communications. Bright colors and bold graphics have been shown to increase consumers’
comprehension of marketing communication. Even these techniques are not foolproof,
however. A classic example of miscommunication occurred when Lever Brothers mailed
out samples of its then new dishwashing liquid, Sunlight, which contains real lemon
juice. The package clearly stated that Sunlight was a household cleaning product.
Nevertheless, many people saw the word sunlight, the large picture of lemons, and the
phrase “with real lemon juice” and thought the product was lemon juice.
Marketers targeting consumers in foreign countries must also worry about the transla-
tion and possible miscommunication of their promotional messages by other cultures.
An important issue for global marketers is whether to standardize or customize the
message for each global market in which they sell. While Absolut’s marketers used the
“World” message globally, they tailored the ads to reflect how people in various regions
might envision an “Absolut World.” For example, a bus shelter on Second Avenue in
New York City was wrapped to look like a subway entrance—a dream of many New York
commuters.7 In Germany, consumers were given a firsthand experience of the “Absolut
World.” For one week, a fleet of Porsche taxis chauffeured passengers quickly—and for
free—around Hamburg, Munich, and Berlin. By the end of that week, the taxis had gen-
erated over 15 million media contacts through TV, print, and online news coverage.8
529
were either online brochures, where essentially the corporate brochure or catalog
corporate blogs was put online, or e-commerce sites, where the companies could facilitate online
Blogs that are sponsored by a sales of products. The next generation of the Internet, Web 2.0, facilitated consumer
company or one of its brands and
maintained by one or more of the empowerment. For the first time, consumers were able to directly speak to other
company’s employees. consumers, the company, and Web communities.
Web 2.0 tools include blogs (online journals), podcasting (online radio shows),
noncorporate blogs
Independent blogs that are not vodcasts (online videos and newscasts), and social networks such as MySpace and
associated with the marketing Facebook. In the beginning, these tools were primarily used by individuals to express
efforts of any particular company themselves. For example, a lawyer may develop a blog to talk about politics because
or brand.
that is a hobby. Or a college freshman may develop a profile on Facebook to stay in
touch with high school friends. But soon, businesses began to see that these tools can be
used to engage with consumers as well. The rise of blogging, for example, has created a
completely new way for marketers to manage their image, connect with consumers, and
generate interest in and desire for their companies’ products.
Despite what could be considered a national obsession with blogs, measuring
blogging activity remains challenging. According to Technorati, the first blog search
engine, there were more than 28 million blogs online in 2006. But by early 2008,
there were so many blogs there was not a consistent number. While research com-
panies agree that there are millions of blogs, comScore Media Metrix says that as
of August 2008, there were 189 million blogs (counting Facebook) and Universal
McCann reports there were 184 million blogs.9 As part of their annual State of the
Blogosphere, Technorati says the real trend is with the Active blogosphere that tends to
influence the mainstream media. Brands also permeate the Blogosphere. Four of five
bloggers post brand or product reviews, so even if a company does not have a formal
social media strategy, chances are the brand is still out in the blogosphere thanks to the
millions of bloggers. As such, companies are now reaching out to the most influential
bloggers. Indeed, more than one-third of those with a blog have been approached to be
a brand advocate.
The question then is whether blogging is a passing fad, representing at best an unre-
liable means of communicating, or an emerging trend. If it is a fad, why are marketers
so interested in blogging as a promotional tool? The answer in part is that blogging
alters the marketing communication process for the promotional elements that rely on
mass communication—advertising, public relations, and sales promotion—by moving
them away from impersonal, indirect communication toward a personalized, direct
communication model.
Blogs can be divided into broad categories: corporate blogs and professional blogs
versus noncorporate blogs (such as personal blogs). Corporate blogs are sponsored
by a company or one of its brands and maintained by one or more of the company’s
employees. Corporate blogs disseminate marketing-controlled information. (Recall from
Chapter 6 that marketing-controlled information is a source of product information that
Promotion and Communication Strategies
originates with marketers promoting the product.) Because blogs are designed to change
daily, corporate blogs are dynamic and highly flexible, giving marketers the opportunity
to adapt their messages more frequently than with any other communication channel.
Initially, blogs were maintained by only the most technology-savvy companies. But
today companies as diverse as Coca-Cola, Starwood Hotels, Honda, Nokia, Benetton,
Ducati, Guinness, and HSBC have all launched corporate blogs. Undoubtedly, many
more will appear in the near future.
In contrast, noncorporate blogs are independent and not associated with the
marketing efforts of any particular company or brand. As such, noncorporate blogs
function much like nonmarketing-controlled information: They provide a source of
information and opinion perceived to be independent and more authentic than a
corporate blog.10 Michael Marx loves Barq’s root beer. He wears Barq’s T-shirts, brings
the beverage to parties, and calls it his “beer.” He established a blog dedicated to Barq’s,
www.thebarqsman.com, where he posted news about the brand, Barq’s commercials
he likes, and musings on why Barq’s is superior to other root beers. Thebarqsman.com
is not affiliated with Coca-Cola, the owner of the Barq’s brand, which had no idea
of the blog’s existence until a New York Times reporter writing a story on brand blogs
PART 5
530
mentioned it. Even though thebarqsman.com is dedicated to a single brand, Marx’s
CHAPTER 16
blog is an example of a noncorporate blog.11
Both corporate and noncorporate blogs have had an impact on the communica-
tion model depicted in Exhibit 16.2. That model shows the feedback channel as
primarily impersonal and numbers-driven. In the traditional communication process,
marketers can see the results of consumer behavior (e.g., a drop in sales), but are
only able to explain them using their judgment. Even the information generated
Encode Decode
message message
Transmit Receive
message message
Message channel
531
Book’s Information for Referencing
ARMSTRONG’S
HANDBOOK OF
HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT
PRACTICE
iv
Publisher’s note
Every possible effort has been made to ensure that the information contained in this book is
accurate at the time of going to press, and the publishers and authors cannot accept respon
sibility for any errors or omissions, however caused. No responsibility for loss or damage
occasioned to any person acting, or refraining from action, as a result of the material in this
publication can be accepted by the editor, the publisher or any of the authors.
First edition published in 1977 as A Handbook of Personnel Management Practice by Kogan Page
Limited
Seventh edition published in 1999 as A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice
Eleventh edition published in 2009 as Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management
Practice
Twelfth edition 2012
Thirteenth edition 2014
Apart from any fair dealing for the purposes of research or private study, or criticism or review, as
permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, this publication may only be repro
duced, stored or transmitted, in any form or by any means, with the prior permission in writing of the
publishers, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms and licences
issued by the CLA. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms should be sent to the
publishers at the undermentioned addresses:
2nd Floor, 45 Gee Street 1518 Walnut Street, Suite 1100 4737/23 Ansari Road
London EC1V 3RS Philadelphia PA 19102 Daryaganj
United Kingdom USA New Delhi 110002
www.koganpage.com India
© Michael Armstrong, 1977, 1984, 1988, 1991, 1995, 1996, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, 2014
The right of Michael Armstrong to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him
in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library.
CHARLES W. LAMB
M.J. Neeley School of Business
Texas Christian University
CARL McDANIEL
Department of Marketing
University of Texas at Arlington
Marketing, 11e © 2011, 2009 South-Western, Cengage Learning
Lamb, Hair, McDaniel ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered by the copyright hereon
may be reproduced or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic,
Vice President of Editorial, Business: Jack W. or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, Web distribution,
Calhoun information storage and retrieval systems, or in any other manner—except as
may be permitted by the license terms herein.
Editor-in-Chief: Melissa S. Acuña
Executive Editor: Michael Roche
For product information and technology assistance, contact us at
Vice President of Marketing: Bill Hendee Cengage Learning Customer & Sales Support, 1-800-354-9706
Developmental Editor: Dana Freeman, For permission to use material from this text or product,
B-Books Ltd. submit all requests online at www.cengage.com/permissions
Sr. Marketing Communications Manager: Further permissions questions can be emailed to
Sarah Greber [email protected]
Laurie J. Mullins
WITH GILL CHRISTY
Edinburgh Gate
Harlow CM20 2JE
United Kingdom
Tel: +44 (0)1279 623623
Web: www.pearson.com/uk
First published in 1985 in Great Britain under the Pitman imprint (print)
Fifth edition published in 1999 by Financial Times Pitman Publishing (print)
Seventh edition 2005 (print)
Eighth edition 2007 (print)
Ninth edition 2010 (print)
Tenth edition 2013 (print and electronic)
Eleventh edition published 2016 (print and electronic)
The right of Laurie J. Mullins to be identified as author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copy-
right, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
The print publication is protected by copyright. Prior to any prohibited reproduction, storage in a retrieval system, distribu-
tion or transmission in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, permission should be
obtained from the publisher or, where applicable, a licence permitting restricted copying in the United Kingdom should be
obtained from the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, Saffron House, 6–10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS.
The ePublication is protected by copyright and must not be copied, reproduced, transferred, distributed, leased, licensed
or publicly performed or used in any way except as specifically permitted in writing by the publishers, as allowed under the
terms and conditions under which it was purchased, or as strictly permitted by applicable copyright law. Any unauthorised
distribution or use of this text may be a direct infringement of the author’s and the publisher’s rights and those responsible
may be liable in law accordingly.
All trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. The use of any trademark in this text does not vest in
the author or publisher any trademark ownership rights in such trademarks, nor does the use of such trademarks imply any
affiliation with or endorsement of this book by such owners.
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence (OGL) v3.0.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
Pearson Education is not responsible for the content of third-party internet sites.
The Financial Times. With a worldwide network of highly respected journalists, The Financial Times provides global business
news, insightful opinion and expert analysis of business, finance and politics. With over 500 journalists reporting from 50
countries worldwide, our in-depth coverage of international news is objectively reported and analysed from an independ-
ent, global perspective. To find out more, visit www.ft.com/pearsonoffer
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
19 18 17 16 15
sixth edition
HUMAN RESOURCE
Derek Torrington
MANAGEMENT
Laura Hall
Stephen Taylor
HRM_A01.qxd 10/22/04 2:02 PM Page iv
First published in Great Britain under the Prentice Hall Europe imprint in 1987
Second edition published 1991
Third edition published 1995
Fourth edition published 1998
Fifth edition published 2002
Sixth edition published 2005
The rights of Derek Torrington, Laura Hall and Stephen Taylor to be identified
as authors of this work have been asserted by them in accordance with the
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
08 07 06 05