COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course on Criminal Procedures and Court Testimony will involve the study of the network of
laws and rules which govern the procedural administration of justice. This course provides the
criminal procedure to be followed in observing criminal prosecution. It introduces common
procedures on how expert witnesses shall execute judicial affidavits, and to testify as expert on
opinion issued and duly certified examination findings being conducted, as well as how to
effectively testify in court.

COURSE OBJECTIVES:

In this course, the students will explore the topics on criminal procedures, administration of
justice, and the various issues that surround the matter at present. Towards the end of the
semester, the students will be introduced to the basic principles of court testimony.

COURSE OUTLINE :

A. General Matters
1. Definition of Criminal Procedure
2. Sources of Criminal Procedure
3. System of Criminal Procedure in the Philippines
4. Distinguish jurisdiction over subject matter from jurisdiction over person of the accused
● People v. Chipeco GR No. 1968, March 31, 1964 - ANDRION
● Binay v. Sandiganbayan GR No. 120011, October 1, 1999 - BORNEA
5. Requisites for exercise of criminal jurisdiction
● People v. Mariano, GR. No. L-40527, June 30, 1976 CAFE
● Tijam v. Sibonghanoy, G.R. No. L-21450, Apr. 15, 1968 CALLO
● Trenas vs. People, 664 SCRA 355 CAUILAN
● Lacson vs. Executive Secretary, 301 SCRA 298 DAMASO
● People vs. Lagon, 185 SCRA 442 DELA CRUZ
● Asistio vs. People, G.R. No. 200465, 20 April 2015* ESMADE
6. Jurisdiction of criminal courts
● Buaya v. Polo, G.R. No. 75097, Jan. 26, 1989 GUEVARRA
● Dela Cruz v. Moya, G.R. No. 65192, Apr. 27, 1988 LORENZO
● SC Court Circular No. 09-94 MONTOYA
● Cuyos v. Garcia, G.R. No. L-46934, Apr. 15, 1988 PAGHUBASAN
● People v. Eduarte, G.R. No. 88232, Feb. 26, 1990 PANGANIBAN
● Morillo vs. People, 777 SCRA 207 PASCUA
● Chiok vs. People, 776 SCRA 120* PASCUAL
● Laude vs. Ginez-Jabalde, 775 SCRA 408 PEDRO
● Atienza vs. People, 716 SCRA 84 PEREZ
● Ombudsman vs. Dechavez, 709 SCRA 375 QUIMENIANO
● Garcia vs. Executive Secretary, 677 SCRA 751 QUINIT
● People vs. Sandiganbayan, 630 SCRA 489* RAMIREZ
 7. When injunction may be issued to restrain criminal prosecution
● Domingo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No 129904, Mar. 16, 2002 REPUNTE

B. Prosecution of Offenses (Rule 110)

1. Criminal actions, how instituted
● Zaldivia v. Reyes, Jr., G.R. No. 102342, July 3, 1992 SADIE
● BPI vs. Hontanosas, Jr., G.R. No. 157163, 25 June 2014 SAYDE
● Heirs of Delgado vs. Gonzalez, G.R. No. 184337, 07 August 2009, 595 SCRA
501 TOMADA
● Lim vs. Mejica, A.C. No. 11121, 13 September 2016 TORRES
2. Who may file them, crimes that cannot be prosecuted de officio
● Philippine Rabbit v. People, 427 SCRA 456 ANDRION
● Perez v. Hagonoy Rural Bank, Inc., G.R. No. 126210, Mar. 9, 2000 BORNEA
● People v. Ilarde, G.R. No. L-57288, Apr. 30, 1984 CAFE
3. Criminal actions, when enjoined
● Metropolitan Bank and Trust Co. vs. Veridiano II, 360 SCRA 359 CALLO
4. Control of prosecution
● Republic v. Judge Sunga, G.R. No. 38634, June 20, 1988 CAUILAN
5. Sufficiency of complaint or information
● People v. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. 128362, Jan. 16,2001 DAMASO
● People v. Amodia GR No. 173791 DELA CRUZ
● People v. Valdesancho, G.R. No. 137051-52, May 30, 2001 ESMADE
● People v. Elpedes, G.R. Nos. 137106-07, Jan. 31, 2001 GUEVARRA
● People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), G.R. No. 160619, 09 September 2015
LORENZO
● Zapata vs. People, G.R. No. 170863, 20 March 2013, 694 SCRA 25 MONTOYA
● People vs. Bali-Balita, G.R. No. 134266, 15 September 2000, 340 SCRA 450
PAGHUBASAN
● Navaja vs. De Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015 PANGANIBAN
● Lee Pue Liong vs. Chua Pue Chin Lee, G.R. No. 181658, 07 August 2013
PASCUA
● Senador vs. People, G.R. No. 201620, 06 March 2013 PASCUAL
6. Designation of offense
● Catiis v. CA, G.R. 153979, February 9, 2006 PEDRO
● People vs. Samillano, 56 SCRA 573 PEREZ
● People vs. Magdowa, 73 Phil. 512 QUIMENIANO
● Buhat vs. Court of Appeals, 265 SCRA 701 QUINIT
● U.S. vs. Panlilio, 28 Phil. 603 RAMIREZ
● People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 175602, 18 January 2012, 663 SCRA 272
REPUNTE
● People vs. Asilan, G.R. No. 188322, 11 April 2012, 669 SCRA 405 SADIE
● People vs. Bayabos, G.R. Nos. 171222 and 174756, 18 February 2015 SAYDE
7. Cause of the accusation
 ● Lacson v. Executive Secretary, G.R. No. 128006, Jan. 20, 1999 TOMADA
● Crisostomo v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152398, Apr. 14, 2005 TORRES
● People vs. Sandiganbayan (Fourth), G.R. No. 160619, 09 September 2015
ANDRION
● Dungo vs. People, G.R. No. 209464, 01 July 2015 BORNEA
8. Duplicity of the offense; exception
● People v. Silva, 4 SCRA 95 CAFE
● Enrile v. Salazar GR NO 92163, June 5, 1990 CALLO
● People vs. Jugueta, G.R. No. 202124, 05 April 2016 CAUILAN
● Loney vs. People, G.R. No. 152644, 10 February 2006, 482 SCRA 194
DAMASO
● People vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 183652, 25 February 2015 DELA CRUZ
9. Amendment or substitution of complaint or information
● Almeda v. Villaluz, GR No. L- 31665, August 6, 1975 ESMADE
● People v. Montenegro G.R. No. 45772, Mar. 25, 1988 GUEVARRA
● Balindong vs. CA, G.R. Nos. 177600 and 178684, 19 October 2015 LORENZO
● Mendez vs. People, G.R. No. 179962, 11 June 2014 MONTOYA
● Ocampo vs. Abando, G.R. Nos. 176830, 185587, etc., 11 February 2014
PAGHUBASAN
● Kummer vs. People, G.R. No. 174461, 11 September 2013, 705 SCRA 490
PANGANIBAN
10. Venue of criminal actions
● Union Bank vs. People, G.R. No. 192565, 28 February 2012, 667 SCRA 113*
PASCUA
● Navaja vs. de Castro, G.R. No. 182926, 22 June 2015 PASCUAL
● Sto. Tomas vs. Salac, 685 SCRA 245 PEDRO
● Yalong vs. People, 704 SCRA 195 PEREZ
11. Intervention of offended party
● Villalon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 196508, 24 September 2014 QUIMENIANO

C. Prosecution of Civil Action (Rule 111)

1. Rule on implied institution of civil action with criminal action
● Yakult Philippines v. CA, GR No. 91856 October 5, 1990 QUINIT
● Chiok vs. People, G.R. Nos. 179814 and 180021, 07 December 2015 RAMIREZ
● Bernardo vs. People, G.R. No. 182210, 05 October 2015 REPUNTE
● Standard Insurance Co., Inc. vs. Cuaresma, G.R. No. 200055, 10 September
2014 SADIE
● Heirs of Simon vs. Chan, G.R. No. 157547, 23 February 2011 SAYDE
● Heirs of Burgos vs. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 169711, 08 February 2010 Sec.
21(a), A.M. No. 04-2-04-SC, August 16, 2004 (Revision of Rule 141, Revised
Rules of Court Legal Fees) TOMADA
2. When civil action may proceed independently
● DMPI Employees Credit Cooperative v. Velez, G.R. No. 129282, Nov. 29, 2001
TORRES
 ● Lim vs. Kou Co Ping, G.R. Nos. 175256 and 179160, 23 August 2012 ANDRION
● Casupanan vs. Laroya, G.R. No. 145391, 26 August 2002 BORNEA
● Cabugao vs. People, G.R. Nos. 163879 and 165805, 30 July 2014 CAFE
3. When separate civil action is suspended
● Co vs. Muñoz, Jr., G.R. No. 181986, 04 December 2013 CALLO
● Domingo vs. Colina, G.R. No. 173330, 17 June 2013 CAUILAN
● Ching vs. Nicdao, G.R. No. 141181, 27 April 2007 DAMASO
4. Effect of the death of accused or convict on civil action
● People vs. Lipata, G.R. No. 200302, 20 April 2016 DELA CRUZ
● Cabugao vs. People, Supra. ESMADE
● Asilo, Jr. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 159017-18 and 159059, 09 March 2011
GUEVARRA
● People vs. Bayot, G.R. No. 200030, 18 April 2012 LORENZO
5. Prejudicial question
● Apa v. Fernandez, G.R. No. 112318, Mar. 20, 1995 MONTOYA
● People v. Delizo, G.R. No. 141624, Aug. 17, 2004 PAGHUBASAN
● Tuanda v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 110544, Oct. 17, 1995 PANGANIBAN
● Ramirez v. Jimenez, 1 CA rep. 143 (Herrera, Vol. IV, p. 270, 2007 ed.) PASCUA
● Beltran v. People, G.R. No. 137567, June 26, 2000 PASCUAL
● Ty-de Zuzuarregui vs. Villarosa, et al., G.R. No. 183788, 05 April 2010 PEDRO
● People vs. Arambulo, Jr., G.R. No. 186597, 17 June 2015 PEREZ
● San Miguel Properties, Inc. v. Perez, G.R. No. 166836, 04 September 2013
QUIMENIANO
● Spouses Gabitano vs. San Miguel Corp., G.R. No. 188767, 24 July 2013 QUINIT
● Pimentel vs. Pimentel, G.R. No. 172060, 13 September 2010 RAMIREZ
● Dreamwork Construction, Inc. vs. Janiola, G.R. No. 184861, 30 June 2009
REPUNTE
6. Rule on filing fees in civil action deemed instituted with the criminal action
● People v. Villanueva, G.R. No. 96469, Oct. 21, 1992 SADIE
● People v. Teehankee, Jr., G.R. Nos. 111206-08, Oct. 6, 1995 SAYDE
● Roa v. Dela Cruz, G.R. No. L- 13134, Feb. 13, 1960 TOMADA

D. Preliminary Investigation (Rule 112)

AM 05- 8-26-SC, October 3, 2005
● Ledesma v. CA, G.R. 161629, July 29, 2005 TORRES
● People v. Basilla, G.R. No. 83938-40, Nov. 6, 1989 ANDRION
● Mendoza vs. People, G.R. No. 197293, 21 April 2014 BORNEA
● Callo-Claridad vs. Esteban, G.R. No. 191567, 20 March 2013 CAFE
● Uy vs. Javellana, A.M. No. MTJ-07-1666, 05 September 2012 CALLO
● Arroyo vs. Department of Justice, et al., G.R. Nos. 199082, 199085 and 199118,
18 September 2012 CAUILAN
1. Nature of right
● P/Supt. Cruz v. Judge Areola, A.M. No. RTJ-01-1642, March 6, 2002 DAMASO
● People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993 DELA CRUZ
 ● US v. Marfori, G.R. No. 10905, Dec. 9, 1916 ESMADE
● People v. Gomez, G.R. No. L-29590, Sept. 30, 1982 GUEVARRA
● People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993 LORENZO
● People v. Bulosan, G.R. No. 58404, Apr. 15, 1988 MONTOYA
● Pilapil v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 101978, Apr. 7, 1993 PAGHUBASAN
● Larranaga v. CA, G.R. No. 130644, Mar. 13, 1998 PANGANIBAN
● Go v. CA, G.R. No. 101837, Feb. 11, 1992 PASCUA
● Bautista vs. CA, 330 SCRA 618 PASCUAL
● Santos vs. Bernardo, 559 SCRA 310 PEDRO
● Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 212140-40, 21 January 2015*
PEREZ
2. Purposes of preliminary investigation
● Ong v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 126858, Sept. 26, 2005 QUIMENIANO
● People v. De Asis, G.R. No. 105581, Dec. 7, 1993 QUINIT
● Larranaga v. CA, G.R. No. 130644, Mar. 13, 1998 RAMIREZ
3. Who may conduct determination of existence of probable cause
● Mangila vs. Pangilinan, G.R. No. 160739, 17 July 2013 REPUNTE
● Yambot vs. Armivit, 565 SCRA 177 SADIE
● Honasan II vs. The Panel of Investigating Prosecutors of the DOJ, 427 SCRA 46
SAYDE
● Alawiya vs. Datumanong, 585 SCRA 267 TOMADA
*A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC (Amendment of Rules 112 and 114 of the Revised Rules on Criminal
Procedure by Removing the Conduct of Preliminary Investigation from Judges of the First Level
Courts)
4. Resolution of investigation prosecutor
● Villaflor v. Vivar, G.R. No. 134744, Jan. 16, 2001 TORRES
● Sy Lim v. CA, G. R. No. L-37494, Mar. 30,1982 ANDRION
● Orquinaza v. People, G.R. No. 165596, Nov. 15, 2005 BORNEA
● Tetangco vs. Ombudsman, 479 SCRA 249 CAFE
● Alawiya vs. Datumanong, Supra. CALLO
● Ledesma vs. CA, 278 SCRA 656 CAUILAN
● Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. Nos. 212140-41, 21 January 2015
DAMASO
● Ocampo vs. Abando, Supra. DELA CRUZ
● Callo-Claridad vs. Esteban, Supra. ESMADE
● Artillero vs. Casimero, G.R. No. 190569, 24 April 2012 GUEVARRA
● Soriano vs. Casanova, 486 SCRA 431 LORENZO
● Ladlad vs. Velasco, 523 SCRA 318* MONTOYA
Sections 32 and 33, R.A. No. 9344 (Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006)
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC (Revised Rule on Children in Conflict with the Law)
5. Review
● Community Rural Bank of Guimba v. Talavera, A.M. No. RTJ-05-1909, Apr. 6,
2005 PAGHUBASAN
● Ching v. Sec. Of Justice, G.R. No. 164317, Feb. 6, 2006 PANGANIBAN
 ● De Ocampo v. Sec. Of Justice, G.R. No. 147392, Jan. 25, 2006 PASCUA
● Ramiscal v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 109727-28, Aug. 18, 2006 PASCUAL
● Mendoza-Arce v. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 149148, Apr. 5, 2002
PEDRO
● Tejano v. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 159190, June 30, 2005 PEREZ
● Social Security System v. DOJ, G.R. No. 158131, Aug. 8, 2007 QUIMENIANO
● Quisay vs. People, G.R. No. 216920, 13 January 2016 QUINIT
● De Lima vs. Reyes, G.R. No. 209330, 11 January 2016 RAMIREZ
● Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, Supra. REPUNTE
● Tolentino vs. Paqueo, Jr., 523 SCRA 377* SADIE
● Asetre vs. Asetre, 584 SCRA 471 SAYDE
● Guy vs. Asia United Bank, 534 SCRA 7 TOMADA
DOJ Circular No. 70, 03 July 2000 (2000 NPS Rule on Appeal)
DOJ Circular No. 70-A, 10 July 2000 (Delegation of Authority to Regional Prosecutors to
Resolve Appeals in Certain Cases)
DOJ Circular No. 3, 13 January 2016 (Automatic Review of Dismissed Cases Involving R.A. No.
9165)
● Mangila vs. Pangilinan, Supra. TORRES
6. When warrant of arrest may issue
● Pestillos vs. Generoso, G.R. No. 182601, 10 November 2014 ANDRION
● Hao v. People, G.R. No. 183345, 17 September 2014 BORNEA
● Mendoza v. People, Supra. CAFE
● Marcos vs. Cabrera-Faller, A.M. No. RTJ-16-2427, 24 January 2017 CALLO
● Soliven vs. Makasiar, 167 SCRA 393 CAUILAN
● Ribaya vs. Binamira-Parcia, 456 SCRA 107 DAMASO
7. Cases not requiring a preliminary investigation
8. Remedies of accused if there was no preliminary investigation
● US v. Banzuela, GR No. 10172,1915 DELA CRUZ
● Conde v. CFI, GR No. L-21236, October 1, 1923 ESMADE
● Ladlad vs. Velasco, G.R. Nos. 172070-72, 172074-76, 175013, 01 June 2007
GUEVARRA
● De Castro vs. Fernandez, Jr., G.R. No. 155041, 14 February 2007 LORENZO
R.A. No. 7438 (An Act Defining Certain Rights of Persons Arrested, Detained or Under
Custodial Investigation as well as the Duties of the Arresting, Detaining and Investigating
Officers and Providing Penalties for Violations Thereof) DOJ Circular No. 61 (Inquest
Procedures)

9. Records
● People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R No. 144159, 29 September 2004 MONTOYA
● Okabe vs. Gutierrez, G.R. No. 150185, 27 May 2004 PAGHUBASAN
● People vs. Grey, et al., G.R. No. 180109, 26 July 2010 PANGANIBAN
10. Cases Not Requiring Preliminary Investigation nor Covered by the Rule on Summary
Procedure
 ● Victorias Milling Co., Inc. vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 156963, 06 October 2008
PASCUA
● Borlongan, Jr. vs. Pena, 538 SCRA 221 PASCUAL
● Tabujara vs. People, 570 SCRA 229 PEDRO
● Sangguniang Bayan of Batac vs. Albano, 260 SCRA 561 PEREZ
11. Other Cases
● Reyes vs. Ombudsman, 15 March 2016 QUIMENIANO
● Young vs. People, 783 SCRA 286 QUINIT
● Forteleza vs. Gonzalez, 782 SCRA 504 RAMIREZ
● Quisay vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA 98* REPUNTE
● De Lima vs. Reyes, 779 SCRA 1* SADIE
● Marasigan vs. Fuentes, 778 SCRA 645 SAYDE
12. Inquest Proceedings

E. Arrest (Rule 113)

1. Arrest, how made
● People v. Jalosjos, G.R. No. 132875-76, Feb. 3, 2000 TOMADA
● People v. Inting,G.R. No. 85866, July 24, 1990 TORRES
● Sanchez vs. People, G.R. No. 204589, 19 November 2014 ANDRION
● Homar vs. People, G.R. No. 182534, 02 September 2015 BORNEA
● Luz vs. People, G.R. No. 197788, 29 February 2012, 667 SCRA 421* CAFE
● People vs. Cunanan, G.R. No. 198024, 16 March 2015 CALLO
● Sanchez vs. Demetriou, 227 SCRA 627 CAUILAN
● Babst vs. National Intelligence Board, 264 SCRA 316 DAMASO
2. Arrest without warrant, when lawful
● People v. Gerente, 219 SCRA 756 DELA CRUZ
● People v. Manlulu, 231 SCRA 701 ESMADE
● People v. Del Rosario, 305 SCRA 740 GUEVRRA
● People v. Kimura, 428 SCRA 51 LORENZO
● Homar vs. People, Supra. MONTOYA
● People vs. Breis, G.R. No. 205823, 17 August 2015 PAGHUBASAN
● Comerciante vs. People, G.R. No. 205926, 22 July 2015 PANGANIBAN
● In Re: Salibo vs. Warden, G.R. No. 197597, 08 April 2015 PASCUA
● Pestillos vs. Generoso, Supra. PASCUAL
● People vs. Nepomoceno, 750 SCRA 209 PEDRO
● Valdez vs. People, 538 SCRA 611 PEREZ
● People vs. Doria, 301 SCRA 668 QUIMENIANO
● Posadas vs. Ombudsman, 341 SCRA 388 QUINIT
● People vs. Villareal, 693 SCRA 549 RAMIREZ
● Ladlad vs. Velasco, 523 SCRA 318* REPUNTE
● People vs. Ereno, 326 SCRA 157 SADIE
3. Method of arrest
● Soria vs. Desierto, G.R. Nos. 153524-25, 31 January 2005, 450 SCRA 339*
SAYDE
 ● Sayo vs. Chief of Police of Manila, 80 Phil. 859 TOMADA
● People vs. Sapal, 328 SCRA 417 TORRES
R.A. No. 9344, Supra.
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC, Supra.
a) By officer with warrant
b) By officer without warrant
c) By private person
● Dimatulac v. Villon, G.R. No. 127107, Oct. 12, 1998). ANDRION
● People v. Suzuki, G.R. No. 120670, Oct. 23, 2003 BORNEA
● People v. Macam, G.R. Nos. L-91011-12, Nov. 24,1994 CAFE
● People v. Ejandra, G.R. No. 134203, May 27, 2004 CALLO
● People v. Cabiles, G.R. No. 112035, Jan. 16, 1998 CAUILAN
4. Requisites of a valid warrant of arrest
● Soliven v. Makasiar GR No L-82585,November 14, 1988 DAMASO
● People v. Inting,G.R. No. 85866, July 24, 1990 DELA CRUZ
● Manangan v. CFI GR No 82760 August 30,1990 ESMADE
● Alimpoos v. Court of Appeals, GR No L-27331, July 30, 1981 GUEVARRA
● People vs. Givera, G.R. No. 132159, 18 January 2001 LORENZO
● Colorado vs. Agapito, A.M. No. MTJ-06-1658, 03 July 2007 MONTOYA
● Mallari vs. CA, G.R. No. 110569, 09 December 1996 PAGHUBASAN
● People vs. Tan, G.R. Nos. 116200-02, 21 June 2001 PANGANIBAN
● People vs. Castiller, G.R. No. 87783, 06 August 1990 PASCUA
● People vs. Dele Cruz, G.R. No. 205414, 04 April 2016 PASCUAL
● Saraum vs. People, G.R. No. 205472, 25 January 2016 PEDRO
● People vs. Lugnasin, 785 SCRA 120 PEREZ
● Palo vs. People, 783 SCRA 557 QUIMENIANO
5. Determination of probable cause for issuance of warrant of arrest
6. Distinguish probable cause of fiscal from that of a judge
● People vs. CA, 301 SCRA 475 QUINIT
● P/Supt. Cruz v. Judge Areola, A.M. No. RTJ-01-1642, March 6, 2002 RAMIREZ

F. Bail (Rule 114)

1. Nature
● Paderanga v. Court of Appeals, 247 ACRS 741 REPUNTE
● Ocampo v. Bernabe, 77 Phil. 55 SADIE
● Almeda v. Villaluz GR No L- 31665, August 6, 1975 SAYDE
● Dinapol v. Baldado AM No 92- 898, August 5, 1993 TOMADA
● Lavides v. Court of Appeals GR No. 129670, February 1, 2000 TORRES
● Serapio v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 148468, 148769 & 149116, Jan. 28, 2003
ANDRION
● Baylon v. Sison, A.M. No. 92-7-360-0, Apr. 6, 1995 BORNEA
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 12 July 2016* CAFE
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 213847, 18 August 2015* CALLO
● Miranda vs. Tuliao, 486 SCRA 377 CAUILAN
 ● Allado vs. Diokno, 232 SCRA 192 DAMASO
● Roberts vs. CA, 254 SCRA 307 DELA CRUZ
● Lacson vs. ES, 301 SCRA 298 ESMADE
● Pico vs. Combong, Jr., 215 SCRA 421 GUEVARRA
● Pantillo III vs. Canoy, A.M. No. RTJ-11-2262, 09 February 2011 LORENZO
● Crisostomo vs. Sandiganbayan, 456 SCRA 45 MONTOYA
● Lavides vs. CA, 324 SCRA 321 PAGHUBASAN
● Ambil, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 175457 and 175482, 06 July 2011
PANGANIBAN
2. When a matter of right; exceptions
● Sy Guan v. Amparo, G.R. No. L-1771, Dec. 4, 1947 PASCUA
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.* PASCUAL
● Tolentino vs. Camano, Jr., 322 SCRA 559 PEDRO
● Go vs. CA, 206 SCRA 138 PEREZ
● Government of US vs. Puruganan, 389 SCRA 623 QUIMENIANO
● Government of Hong Kong vs. Olalia, 521 SCRA 470 A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC,
Supra. QUINIT
3. When a matter of discretion
A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC
● Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region v. Olalia, G.R. No. 153675,
Apr. 19, 2007 RAMIREZ
Sec. 34, R.A. 9344, Juvenile and Justice Act of 2006
● Leviste v. CA, GR No. 189122, March 17, 2010 REPUNTE
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.* SADIE
● Qui vs. People, G.R. No. 196161, 26 September 2012, 682 SCRA 94* SAYDE
● Leviste vs. Court of Appeals and People, G.R. No. 189122, 17 March 2010, 615
RA 619* TOMADA
● Obosa vs. CA, 266 SCRA 281 TORRES
● Alva vs. CA, 487 SCRA 146 ANDRION
● Chua vs. CA, 520 SCRA 729 BORNEA
● People vs. Fitzgerald, 505 SCRA 573 CAFE
4. Hearing of application for bail in capital offenses
5. Guidelines in fixing amount of bail
6. Bail when not required
7. Increase or reduction of bail
● Sy Guan v. Amparo, 79 Phil 670 CALLO
8. Forfeiture and cancellation of bail
9. Application not a bar to objections in illegal arrest, lack of or irregular preliminary
investigation
10. Hold departure order & bureau of immigration watch list DOJ Department Order No. 17
● Silverio v. Court of Appeals GR No. 94284, April 8, 1991 SC Circular 39-97, June
19, 1997 CAUILAN
A.M. No. 99-9-141- MTCC November 25, 1999
A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC
DOJ Department Order No. 41
● 8.2 Santiago v. Vasquez, G.R. No. 99289-90, January 27, 1993 DAMASO
11. Capital Offense
● Trillanes, Jr. vs. Pimentel, 556 SCRA 471 DELACRUZ
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, 767 SCRA 282* ESMADE
R.A. No. 9346 (An Act Prohibiting the Death Penalty)
12. Capital Offense or an Offense Punishable by Reclusion Perpetua of Life Imprisonment,
not Bailable
● People vs. Valdez, G.R. Nos. 216007-09, 08 December 2015 GUEVARRA
● Enrile vs. Sandiganbayan, Supra.* LORENZO
13. Burden of Proof in Bail Application
● Gacad vs. Clapis, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-10-2257, 17 July 2012 MONTOYA
14. Amount of Bail Guidelines
● Tanog vs. Balindong, G.R. No. 187464, 25 November 2015 PAGHUBASAN
The 2000 Bail Bond Guide
DOJ Circular No. 20, 30 March 2015 (Guidelines on Bail for R.A. No. 10175 or Cybercrime
Prevention Act of 2012
DOJ Circular No. 48, 02 December 2015 (Guidelines on Recommending Bail for Foreign
Nationals in Violation of Republic Act No. 9165)
15. Property Bond, How Posted
Re: Report on the Judicial Audit Conducted in the RTC, Branch 4, Dolores, Eastern Samar,
A.M. No. 06-6-340-RTC, 17 October 2007
16. Deposit of Cash as Bail
● Pantillo III vs. Canoy, Supra. PANGANIBAN
● Lachica vs. Tormis, A.M. No. MTJ-05-1609, 20 September 2005 PASCUA
17. Recognizance
● OCA vs. Floro, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-99-7-273-RTC, RTJ-06-1988, 31 March 2006
PASCUAL
● Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1738, 17 November 2005
QUIMENIANO
18. Bail, When Not Required; Reduced Bail or Recognizance
● Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, Id. R.A. No. 6036 (Cases when Bail not Required)
QUINIT
19. Bail, Where Filed
● Pantillo III vs. Canoy, Supra. RAMIREZ
Re: Anonymous Letter-Complaint Against Marilou Runes-Tamang, A.M. No.
MTJ-04-1558, 07 April 2010 A.M. No. 05-8-26-SC, Supra.
20. Notice of Application to Prosecutor
● Torrevillas vs. Navidad, A.M. No. RTJ-06-1976 and A.M. No. RTJ-06-1977, 29
April 2009 REPUNTE
21. Release on Bail
Re: Report on the Judicial Audit Conducted in the RTC, Branch 4, Dolores,
Eastern Samar, Supra.
22. Increase or Reduction of Bail
 ● Conquilla vs. Bernardo, A.M. No. MTJ-09-1737, 09 February 2011 SADIE
23. Forfeiture of Bail
Re: Josefina D. Farrales, A.M. Nos. 06-3-196-RTC and A.M. No. 06-7-416-RTC,
24 December 2008
● Mendoza vs. Alarma, G.R. No. 151970, 07 May 2008 SAYDE
24. Cancellation of Bail
● Bongcac vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 156687-88, 21 May 2009 TOMADA
● People vs. Cawaling, G.R. No. 157147, 17 April 2009 TORRES

25. Arrest of Accused Out on Bail

● Silverio vs. CA, G.R. No. 94284, 08 April 1991 ANDRION
26. No Bail After Final Judgment; Exception
● Adalim-White vs. Bugtas, Supra. BORNEA
● Vicente vs. Majaducon, A.M. No. RTJ-02-1968, 23 June 2005 CAFE

G. Rights of the Accused (Rule 115)

1. Rights of accused at the trial
● People v. Mingoa, G.R. No. L-5371, Mar. 26, 1953 CALLO
● Beltran v. Samson G.R. No. 32025, Sept. 23, 1929 CAUILAN
● People v. Honrada, G.R. Nos. 112178-79, Apr. 21, 1995 DAMASO
● Gandicela v. Lutero, G.R. No. L-4069, Mar. 5, 1951 DELACRUZ
● People v. Teehankee, G.R. Nos. 111206-08, Oct. 6, 1995 ESMADE
● People v. AngGioc, G.R. No. L- 48547, Oct. 31, 1941 GUEVARRA
● People v. Morial, G.R. No. 129295, Aug. 15, 2001 LORENZO
● People v. Serzo, Jr., G.R. No. 118435, June 20, 1997 MONTOYA
● People v. Ayson, G.R. No. L-28508-9, July 7, 1989 PAGHUBASAN
● Jacob vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 162206, 17 November 2010 PANGANIBAN
● Crisostomo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 152398, 14 April 2005* PASCUA
● People vs. Abatayo, G.R. No. 139456, 07 July 2004 PASCUAL
● People vs. Larrañaga, G.R. Nos. 138874-75, 03 February 2004 PEDRO
● Pielago vs. People, G.R. No. 202020, 13 March 2013 PEREZ
2. Rights of persons under custodial investigation
● People v. Sunga, 399 SCRA 624 QUIMENIANO
● People v. Jose Ting LanUy, G.R. No. 157399, Nov. 17, 2005 QUINIT
● People v. Duenas, Jr. 426 SCRA 666 RAMIREZ
● People v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 122485, Feb. 1, 1999 REPUNTE

H. Arraignment and Plea (Rule 116)

1. Arraignment and plea, how made
● Borja v. Mendoza, 77 SCRA 42 RA 8493 Speedy Trial Act RA 7610 (Child Abuse
Act RA 9165 SC AO 104-96 SADIE
● Teehankee Jr. v. Madayag GR NO 103102, March 6, 1992 SAYDE
● People v. Pangilinan 518 SCRA 358 TOMADA
● People v. Comendador GR No. L-38000, September 19, 1980 TORRES
 ● People v. Villasco, G.R. No. L-4706, July 24, 1951 ANDRION
● Bandoy vs. Jacinto, Jr., A.M. No. RTJ-14-2399, 19 November 2014 BORNEA
● Ramiscal, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 172476-99, 15 September 2010
CAFE
● Pielago vs. People, Supra. CALLO
● Kummer vs. People, G.R. No. 174461, 11 September 2013 CAUILAN
● People vs. Moro Sabilul, 93 SCRA 567 DAMASO
● People vs. Magat, 332 SCRA 517 DELACRUZ
● People vs. Pangilinan, 518 SCRA 358 ESMADE
● People vs. Espinosa, 409 SCRA 256 A.M. No. 02-1-18-SC, Supra. GUEVARRA

R.A. No. 8493 (Speedy Trial Act of 1998)

A.M. No. 12-11-2-SC Guidelines for Decongesting Holding Jails by Enforcing the Rights of the
Accused Persons to Bail and to Speedy Trial
2. When should plea of not guilty be entered
3. When may accused enter a plea of guilty to a lesser offense
● Daan v. Sandiganbayan GR No. 163972-77, March 28, 2008 LORENZO
● Bug-atan vs. People, G.R. No. 175195, 15 September 2010, 630 SCRA 537*
MONTOYA
● Heirs of Gevero vs. Guihing Agricultural and Development Corp., G.R. No.
122619, 18 August 2006 PAGHUBASAN
● Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, 550 SCRA 233* PANGANIBAN
● People vs. Villarama, 210 SCRA 246 PASCUA
4. Accused plead guilty to capital offense, what the court should do
● People v. Basa, 51 SCRA 317 PASCUAL
● People vs. Baharan, G.R. No. 188314, 10 January 2011 PEDRO
● People vs. Gambao, et al., G.R. No. 172707, 01 October 2013, 706 SCRA 508*
PEREZ
● People vs. Durango, 329 SCRA 758 QUIMENIANO
● People vs. Ceredon, 542 SCRA 550 QUINIT
5. Plea of Guilty to Non-Capital Offense; Reception of Evidence, Discretionary
● People vs. Flores, G.R. No. 137491, 23 November 2000 RAMIREZ
6. Withdrawal of Improvident Plea of Guilty
● People vs. Solamillo, G.R. No. 123161, 18 June 2003 REPUNTE
7. Duty of Court to Inform Accused of his Right to Counsel
● Gamas vs. Oco, A.M. No. MTJ-99-1231, 17 March 2004 SADIE
8. Appointment of Counsel de Officio
● PAO vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 154297-300, 15 February 2008 SAYDE
9. Time for Counsel de Officio to Prepare for Arraignment
● People vs. Gonzaga, G.R. No. L-48373, 30 January 1984 TOMADA
10. Bill of Particulars
● Enrile vs. People, G.R. No. 213455, 11 August 2015, 766 SCRA 1* TORRES
● Virata vs. Sandiganbayan, 221 SCRA 52 ANDRION
11. Production or Inspection of Material Evidence in Possession of Prosecution
 ● Lejano vs. People, G.R. Nos. 176389 and 176864, 14 December 2010 BORNEA
12. Suspension of Arraignment
● ABS-CBN Corp. Vs. Gozon, G.R. No. 195956, 11 March 2015 CAFE
● Aguinaldo vs. Ventus, G.R. No. 176033, 11 March 2015 CALLO
13. Searching Inquiry

I. Motion to Quash (Rule 117)

1. Grounds
● People v. Yutila, G.R. No. L- 34332, Jan. 27, 1981 CAUILAN
● People v. Misola, G.R. No. L-3606, Dec. 29, 1950 DAMASO
● People v. Duque, G.R. No. 100285, Aug. 18, 1992 DELACRUZ
● Yapdiangco v. Buencamino, G.R. No. L-31442, June 24, 1983 ESMADE
● Galvez v. CA,G.R. No. 120715, Mar. 29, 1996). GUEVARRA
● Quisay vs. People, Supra. LORENZO
● Enrile vs. People, Supra. MONTOYA
● In Re Salibo vs. Warden, Supra.PAGHUBASAN
● Estrada vs. Office of the Ombudsman, Supra. PANGANIBAN
● Lazarte, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan, 581 SCRA 431 PASCUA
● Uy vs. CA, 276 SCRA 367 PASCUAL
● Eugenio vs. People, 549 SCRA 433 PEDRO
● People vs. Rondero, 320 SCRA 383 PEREZ
● Romualdez vs. Sandiganbayan, 385 SCRA 436 QUIMENIANO
● Sasot vs. People, 462 SCRA 138 QUINIT
● Pecho vs. Sandiganbayan, 238 SCRA 116 RAMIREZ
● People vs. Desuyo, 381 SCRA 235 REPUNTE
● Monteverde vs. People, 387 SCRA 196 SADIE
● Loney vs. People, 482 SCRA 194 SAYDE
● Cabico vs. Dimaculangan-Querijero, 522 SCRA 300 TOMADA
● Poblete vs. Sandiganbayan, 426 SCRA 346 TORRES
● Valencia vs. Sandiganbayan, 433 SCRA 88 ANDRION
● Tan vs. COMELEC, 237 SCRA 353 BORNEA
2. Time to Move to Quash
● Tolentino vs. Paqueo, G.R. No. 150606, 07 June 2007* CAFE
3. Form and Contents
● People vs. Andrade, G.R. No. 187000, 24 November 2014 CALLO
● Tolentino vs. Paqueo, Id. CAUILAN
4. Distinguish from demurrer to evidence
5. Effects of sustaining the motion to quash
● Bulaong v. CA, G.R. No. 78555, Jan. 30, 1990 DAMASO
● Acharon v. Purisima, GR No. 23731, February 26, 1965 DELACRUZ
● Gonzales vs. Salvador, G.R. No. 168340, December 5, 2006 ESMADE
6. Exception to the rule that sustaining the motion is not a bar to another prosecution
7. Double jeopardy
● People v. Obsania, 23 SCRA 1249 GUEVARRA
 ● Ivler v. Modesto- San Pedro, GR No. 172716, November 17, 2010 LORENZO
● People v. Buan, GR No. L-15974, March 29, 1968 MONTOYA
● Melo v. People, 85 Phil 766 PAGHUBASAN
8. Provisional dismissal
● Bonsubre, Jr. vs. Yerro, G.R. No. 205952, 11 February 2015 PANGANIBAN
● Co vs. New Propserity Plastic Products, G.R. No. 183994, 30 June 2014
PASCUA
● Los Baños vs. Pedro, G.R. No. 173588, 22 April 2009, 586 SCRA 303*
PASCUAL
● People vs. Lacson, 400 SCRA 267 PEDRO
● Torres vs. Aguinaldo, 461 SCRA 599 PEREZ
9. Failure to Move to Quash or to Allege Any Ground Therefor
● People vs. Andrade, Supra. QUIMENIANO
● People vs. Asilan, Supra. QUINIT

J. Pre-trial (Rule 118)

1. Matters to be considered during pre-trial
● Zaldivar vs. People, G.R. No. 197056, 02 March 2016 RAMIREZ
● Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 163972-77, 28 March 2008A.M. No. 03-1-
09-SC (Rule on Guidelines to be Observed by the Trial Court Judges and Clerks
of Court in the Conduct of Pre-Trial and Use of Deposition-Discovery Measures)
REPUNTE
A.M. No. 04-1-12-SC-PHILJA, Revised Guidelines for the Implementation of an Enhanced Pre-
Trial Proceeding under the Justice Reform Initiative Support (JURIS) Project
A.M. No. 11-1-6-SC-PHILJA (Re: Consolidated and Revised Guidelines to Implement the
Expanded Coverage of Court-Annexed mediation [CAM] and Judicial Dispute Resolution [JDR])
2. What the court should do when prosecution and offended party agree to the plea
offered by the accused
3. Pre-trial agreement
● Daan vs. Sandiganbayan, Id. SADIE
4. Non-appearance during pre-trial
● Garayblas vs. Ong, G.R. 174507-30, 03 August 2011 SAYDE
5. Pre-trial Order
● People vs. Guzman, G.R. No. 169246, 26 January 2007 TOMADA
6. Referral of some cases for court annexed mediation and judicial dispute resolution

K. Trial (Rule 119)

● Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 416 SCRA 133, 2003 TORRES
1. Time to Prepare for Trial
● Mari vs. Gonzales, G.R. No. 187728, 12 September 2011 ANDRION
2. Continuous Trial Until Terminated; Postponements
● Tan vs. People, G.R. No. 173637, 21 April 2009 BORNEA
● Sps. Uy vs. Adriano, G.R. No. 159098, 27 October 2006 CAFE
R.A. No. 8493, Supra.
A.M. No. 15-06-10-SC, Re: Adopting the Guidelines for Continuous Trial of Criminal Cases in
Pilot Courts
A.M. No. 00-4-07-SC, Rule on Examination of Child Witness
3. Exclusions
● Mari vs. Gonzales, Supra.CALLO
4. Extended Time Limit
● Olbes vs. Buemio, G.R. No. 173319, 04 December 2009 CAUILAN
5. Sanctions
● Caballes vs. CA, G.R. No. 163108, 23 February 2005 DAMASO
6. Remedy Where Accused is not Brought to Trial Within the Time Limit
● Sps. Uy v. Adriano, Supra. DELA CRUZ
7. Speedy Trial
8. Order of Trial
● People vs. Marcial, G.R. Nos. 152864-85, 27 September 2006 ESMADE
9. Application for Examination of Witness for Accused Before Trial
● Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 111502-04, 22 November 2001
GUEVARRA
10. Examination of Defense Witness; How Made
● Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan, Id., LORENZO
11. Bail to Secure Appearance of Material Witness
● Seludo vs. Fineza, A.M. No. RTJ-03-1813, 21 November 2003 MONTOYA
12. Examination of Witness for the Prosecution
● Go v. People, G.R. No. 185527, 18 July 2012 PAGHUBASAN
● Vda. De Manguerra vs. Risos, G.R. No. 152643, 28 August 2008 PANGANIBAN
13. Instances when presence of accused is required by law
R.A. 8493, Speedy Trial Act
14. Requisite before trial can be suspended on account of absence of witness
15. Trial in absentia
● Parada v. Veneracion, A.M. No.RTJ- 96-1353. March 11, 1997 PASCUA
16. Remedy when accused is not brought to trial within the prescribed period
17. Requisites for discharge of accused to become a state witness
● People v. Ferrer, G.R. No. 102062, Mar. 14, 1996 PASCUAL
R.A. 6981, Witness Protection Act
18. Effects of discharge of accused as state witness
● People v. Feliciano, G.R. No. 136258, Oct. 10, 2001 PEDRO
● People v. Beberino GR No L-23213 October 28, 1977 PEREZ
● Jimenez, Jr. vs. People, G.R. Nos. 209195 and 209215, 17 September 2014
QUIMENIANO
● Monge vs. People, G.R. No. 170308, 07 March 2008 QUINIT
● Ampatuan, Jr. vs. De Lima, 695 SCRA 159 RAMIREZ
● Valerio vs. CA, 535 SCRA 453 REPUNTE
● Flores vs. Sandiganbayan, 124 SCRA 109 SADIE
19. Discharge of Accused Operates as Acquittal
● Monge vs. People, Id. SAYDE
 20. When Mistake has been Made in Charging the Proper Offense
● Pacoy v. Cajigal, G.R. No. 157472, 28 September 2007 TOMADA
21. Exclusion of the Public
● Perez v. Estrada, A.M. No. 01-4-03-SC, 29 June 2001 TORRES
22. Consolidation of Trials of Related Offenses
● People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 149495, 21 August 2003 ANDRION
23. Demurrer to evidence
● People v. Mahinay, G.R. No. 109613, July 17, 1995 BORNEA
● Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 220598, 19 July 2016
CAFE
● People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 197953, 05 August 2015 CALLO
24. Reopening
Re: Complaint against Ofelia Pinto, A.M. No. RTJ-11-2289, 02 October 2012
Cabarles vs. Maceda, G.R. No. 161330, 20 February 2007

L. Judgment (Rule 120)

1. Requisites of a judgment
● Barbers v. Laguio Jr., AM No. RTJ-00-1568, February 15, 2001 CAUILAN
● Tan vs. Ramirez, G.R. No. 158929, 03 August 2010 DAMASO
2. Contents of judgment
● Francisco v. CA, G.R. No. L-45674, May 30, 1983 DELACRUZ
R.A. 9344, Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
● Declarador v. Gubaton, G.R. No. 159208, Aug. 18, 2006 ESMADE
● People v. Francisco, G.R. No. 102976, Oct. 25, 1995 GUEVARRA
R.A. 9344, Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006
● Bacolod vs. People, G.R. No. 206236, 15 July 2013 LORENZO
● Garces vs. Hernandez, Jr., G.R. No. 180761, 09 August 2010 MONTOYA
● Zafra vs. People, G.R. No. 176317, 23 July 2014 PAGHUBASAN
Administrative Circular No. 83-15 (Protocols and Procedures in the Promulgation, Publication,
and Posting on the Websites of Decisions, Final Resolutions, and Final Orders Using Fictitious
Names)
3. Judgment for Two or More Offenses
● People vs. Lindo, G.R. No. 189818, 09 August 2010 PANGANIBAN
4. Judgment in Case of Variance in Allegation and Proof
● Ricalde vs. People, G.R. No. 211002, 21 January 2015 PASCUA
● People vs. Pareja, G.R. No. 202122, 15 January 2014 PASCUAL
5. When an Offense Includes or is Included in Another
● Asistio vs. People, G.R. No. 200465, 20 April 2015 PEDRO
6. Promulgation of judgment; instances of promulgation of judgment in absentia
● Salvador vs. Chua, G.R. No. 212865, 15 July 2015 PEREZ
● Jaylo vs. Sandiganbayan (First), G.R. Nos. 183152-54, 21 January 2015, 746
SCRA 452 QUIMENIANO
● Pascua vs. CA, 348 SCRA 197 QUINIT
 ● People vs. Taruc, 576 SCRA 682* RAMIREZ
● Icdang vs. Sandiganbayan, 664 SCRA 253 REPUNTE
7. Modification of Judgment
● Villareal vs. People, G.R. Nos. 151258, etc., 01 December 2014 SADIE
8. When does judgment become final (four instances)
9. Entry of Judgment
10. AM No. 20-06-14-SC Guidelines in the imposition of Community Service as penalty in
Lieu of Imprisonment

M. New Trial or Reconsideration (Rule 121)

1. Grounds for new trial
● Aguilar v. Court of Appeals GR No. 114282, November 28, 1995 SAYDE
● Tan Ang Bun v. Court of Appeals G.R. No. L-47747, Feb. 15, 1990 TOMADA
● Paredes v. Borja, G.R. No. L- 15559, Nov. 29, 1961 TORRES
● People v. Ballabare, G.R. No. 108871, Nov. 19, 1996 ANDRION
● Tadeja vs. People, G.R. No. 145336, 20 February 2013 BORNEA
● Custodio vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 96027-28, 08 March 2005 CAFE
● Payumo vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 151911 and 154537, 24 July 2011
CALLO
● Dinglasan, Jr. vs. CA, G.R. No. 145420, 19 September 2006 CAUILAN
2. Grounds for reconsideration
3. Requisites before a new trial may be granted on ground of newly discovered evidence
● Abrajano v. CA, G.R. No. 114282, Oct. 13, 2000) DAMASO
4. Form of Motion and Notice to the Prosecutor
● Flores vs. People, G.R. No. 203961, 29 July 2015 DELACRUZ
5. Effects of granting a new trial or reconsideration
● People vs. Licayan, G.R. No. 203961, 29 July 2015 ESMADE
6. Application of Neypes doctrine in criminal cases
● Neypes v. CA, G.R. No. 141524, Sept. 14, 2005 GUEVARRA

N. Appeal (Rule 122)

1. Effect of an appeal
2. Who May Appeal

● Burgos, Jr. vs. Sps. Naval, G.R. No. 219468, 08 June 2016 LORENZO
● People vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 164577, 05 July 2010 MONTOYA
● People vs. Hernandez, G.R. No. 154218 and 154372, 28 August 200
PAGHUBASAN
3. Where to Appeal
● Macapagal vs. People, G.R. No. 193217, 26 February 2014 PANGANIBAN
4. How Appeal Taken
● Sanico vs. People, G.R. No. 198753, 25 March 2015 PASCUA
● Macapagal vs. People, Id. PASCUAL
● People vs. Mateo, G.R. Nos. 147648-87, 07 July 2004 PEDRO
 A.M. 00-5-03-SC, October 3, 2002
5. When Appeal to be Taken
● Macapagal vs. People, Id. PEREZ
● Ramirez vs. People, G.R. No. 197832, 02 October 2013 QUIMENIANO
● Rodriguez vs. People, G.R. No. 192799, 24 October 2012 QUINIT
● People vs. Rocha, G.R. No. 173797, 31 August 2007 RAMIREZ
6. Effect of Appeal by any of Several Accused
● People v. Fernandez, G.R. No. 80481, June 27, 1990 REPUNTE
● Benabaye vs. People, G.R. No. 203466, 25 February 2015 SADIE
● People vs. Valdez, G.R. No. 175602, 13 February 2013 SAYDE
● People vs. Brillantes, G.R. No. 190610, 25 April 2012 TOMADA
7. Grounds for Dismissal of Appeal
8. Withdrawal of Appeal
● Moll vs. Buban, G.R. No. 136974, 27 August 2002 TORRES
9. Appointment of Counsel de Officio for Accused on Appeal
● People vs. Rio, G.R. No. 90294, 24 September 1991 ANDRION

O. Search and Seizure (Rule 126)

1. Nature of search warrant
● People v. Veloso GR No L- 23051, October 20, 1925 BORNEA
● Prudente v. Dayrit GR No. 82870, December 14, 1989 CAFE
● Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967 CALLO
● Katz vs. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) CAUILAN
● People vs. Marti, G.R. No. 81561, 18 January 1991 DAMASO
● Te vs. Breva, G.R. No. 164974, 05 August 2015, 765 SCRA 40* DELA CRUZ
● Santos vs. Pryce Gases, Inc., 539 SCRA 474 ESMADE
2. Distinguish from warrant of arrest
3. Application for search warrant, where filed
● Sps. Marimla v. People of the Philippines, GR No. 158467, October 16, 2009
GUEVARRA
● Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corp. vs. Romars International Gases Corp., G.R. No.
189669, 16 february 2015 LORENZO
● Laud vs. People, G.R. No. 199032, 19 November 2014 MONTOYA
● Malaloan vs. CA, 232 SCRA 249 PAGHUBASAN
● People vs. Chiu, 424 SCRA 72 PANGANIBAN
● Sony Computer Entertainment vs. Supergreen, 518 SCRA 750 PASCUA
Administrative Circular No. 13-85 (Guidelines and Procedures in the Issuance of Search
Warrants)
SC Circular No. 19-87 (Amended Guidelines and Procedures on Applications for Search
Warrants for Illegal Possession of Firearms and other Serious Crimes filed in
Metro Manila Courts and other Courts with Multiple Salas)
A.M. No. 99-10-09-SC, Resolution Clarifying Guidelines on the Application for and
Enforceability of Search Warrants
4. Probable cause
 ● Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65334, Dec. 26, 1984 PASCUAL
● Harvey v. Defensor- Santiago GR No 82544, June 28, 1988 PEDRO
● Tiu Chun Hai v. Commissioner, G.R. No. L-10009 December 22, 1958 PEREZ
5. Personal examination by judge of the applicant and witnesses
● Marinas v. Siochi, G.R. Nos. L-25707 & 25753-25754, May 14, 1981
QUIMENIANO
● Roan v. Gonzales, G.R. No. 71410, Nov. 25, 1986 QUINIT
● Mata v. Bayona, G.R. No. L-50720, Mar. 26, 1984 RAMIREZ
6. Particularity of place to be searched and things to be seized
● Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65332, Dec. 26, 1984 REPUNTE
● People v. Rubio, GR No L-35500, October 27, 1932 SADIE
● Stonehill v. Diokno, G.R. No. L-19550, June 19, 1967 SAYDE
7. Personal property to be seized
● Burgos v. Chief of Staff, G.R. No. L-65332, Dec. 26, 1984 TOMADA
● Laud vs. People, Id.TORRES
● Worldwide Web Corp. vs. People, Supra. ANDRION
● People vs. Nuñez, 591 SCRA 394 BORNEA
● Tambasen vs. People, 246 SCRA 184 CAFE
8. Requisites for Issuing Search Warrant
● Laud vs. People, Id. CALLO
● PLDT vs. Alvarez, G.R. No. 179408, 05 March 2014 CAUILAN
● La Chemise Lacoste vs. Fernandez, 129 SCRA 373 DAMASO
● Hon Ne Chan vs. Honda, 541 SCRA 249 DELA CRUZ
● Kho vs. Makalintal, 306 SCRA 70 ESMADE
● Uy vs. BIR, 344 SCRA 36 GUEVARRA
9. Examination of Complainant; Record
● Ogayon vs. People, G.R. No. 188794, 788 SCRA 670* LORENZO
● Balayon, Jr. vs. Dinopol, 490 SCRA 547 MONTOYA
● People vs. Salanguit, 356 SCRA 683 PAGHUBASAN
● People vs. Dichoso, 180 SCRA 69 PANGANIBAN
10. Issuance and Form of Search Warrant
● People vs. Mamaril, G.R. No. 171980, 06 October 2010 PASCUA
11. Right to Break Door or Window to Effect Search
● Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. vs. Bright Future Technologies, Inc., G.R.
No. 169156, 15 February 2007 PASCUAL
● People vs. Huang Zhen Hua, G.R. No. 139301, 29 September 2004 PEDRO
12. Search of House, Room, or Premises to be Made in Presence of Two Witnesses
● People vs. Punzalan, G.R. No. 199087, 11 November 2015 PEREZ
13. Time of Making Search
● People vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 172603, 24 August 2007 QUIMENIANO
14. Validity of Search Warrant
● Lacadin vs. Mangino, A.M. No. MTJ-01-1346, 09 July 2003, 405 SCRA 473*
QUINIT
15. Receipt for the Property Seized
 ● People vs. del Castillo, G.R. No. 153254, 30 September 2004 RAMIREZ
● People vs. Policarpio, 158 SCRA 88 REPUNTE
● People vs. Go, 411 SCRA 81 SADIE
● People vs. Endaya, 731 SCRA 1 SAYDE
● Quinicot vs. People, 590 SCRA 458 TOMADA
16. Delivery of Property and Inventory Thereof to Court; Return and Proceedings Thereon
● Tenorio vs. CA, G.R. No. 110604, 10 October 2003 TORRES
● People vs. del Castillo, Id. ANDRION
● People vs. Go, G.R. No. 144639, 12 September 2003 BORNEA
● Betoy, Sr. vs. Coliflores, 483 SCRA 435 CAFE
● Mallillin vs. People, 553 SCRA 619 CALLO
● People vs. CFI of Rizal, 101 SCRA 86 CAUILAN
17. Exceptions to search warrant requirement
a. Search incidental to lawful arrest
● People v. Musa, G.R. No. 95329, Jan. 27, 1993 DAMASO
● People vs. Calantiao, G.R. No. 203984, 18 June 2014 DELACRUZ
● People vs. Belocura, G.R. No. 173474, 29 August 2012 ESMADE
b. Consented search
● People v. Burgos, G.R. No. 92739, Aug. 2, 1991 GUEVARRA
c. Search of moving vehicle
● People v. Lo Ho Wing, G.R. No. 88017, Jan. 21, 1991 LORENZO
d. Check points; body checks in airport
● People v. Vinecario, G.R. No. 141137, January 20, 2004 MONTOYA
● People v. Johnson, G.R. No. 138881, December 18, 2000
PAGHUBASAN
e. Plain view situation
● People v. Concepcion, 361 SCRA 540 PANGANIBAN
● People v. Sarap, 399 SCRA 503 PASCUA
● People v. Go; 411 SCRA 81 PASCUAL
f. Stop and frisk situation
● Malacat v. Court of Appeals, 283 SCRA 159 PEDRO
● Manalili v. CA, G.R. No. 113447, Oct. 9, 1997 PEREZ
g. Enforcement of custom laws
h. Remedies from unlawful search and seizure
18. Motion to Quash a Search Warrant or to Suppress Evidence; Where to File
● Ogayon vs. People, Id. QUIMENIANO
● SEC vs. Mendoza, G.R. No. 170425, 23 April 2012 QUINIT

P. Provisional Remedies (Rule 127)

1. Nature
● Cala v. Roldan, G.R. No. L-252, Mar. 30, 1946 RAMIREZ
2. Kinds of provisional remedies
● Mindanao Savings, etc v. Court of Appeals, 172 SCRA 480 REPUNTE
3. Attachment
 ● Oñate v. Abrogar, G.R. Nos. 107303 and 107491, 23 February 1995
A.M. No. 09-6-8-SC (Rules of Procedure for Environmental Cases) SADIE