ACCA F8 Audit Evidence Summary Notes
ACCA F8 Audit Evidence Summary Notes
2. Briefly explain the financial statements assertions for balance sheet, profit &
loss and P&D?
5. What are the factors that influence the reliability of audit evidence?
6. What are the factors that influence the auditor’s judgment concerning the
sufficiency of Audit evidence obtained?
8. Explain the concept of Relevance in the context of ISA 500 along with
examples.
Audit evidence is all the information used/gathered by the External auditor in arriving at the
conclusions on which the audit opinion is based, and includes information contained in the accounting
records (G.L, Trial balance and other records) underlying the financial statements.
Audit evidence, which is cumulative in nature, includes audit evidence obtained from audit procedures
performed during the course of the audit and may include audit evidence obtained from other sources
such as previous years audit working papers (ISA 230) of the same audit client.
Audit evidence in simple words can be defined as any piece of information which assists the auditor to
reach a conclusion on the truth and fairness of the financial statements of the company.
Audit evidence is obtained from: (might include information other than below mentioned list)
Documents / supporting documents such as purchase orders, payment and receipt vouchers,
invoices, receipts, employee time sheets, customer orders, letters, bank statements, contracts
and other legal documents (Memorandum, Articles etc. )
Entries / postings in Cash Book, Profit and Loss account, Balance Sheet etc.
Computations produced by the client or by the auditor himself, for example depreciation
calculations, reconciliations, computations of accruals and prepayments etc.
Evidence gained from the auditors physical counting of stock at the balance sheet data (stock
counting of Raw Material / W.I.P / Finished Goods)
Important thing to note:
Audit evidence requires that the auditor obtains Sufficient Appropriate Audit Evidence to be
able to draw reasonable conclusions on which to base the audit opinion.
Appropriateness = Quality
Relevance Reliability
Appropriateness is the measure of quality of audit evidence which has 2 elements: Relevance and
Reliability.
RELEVANCE
Factors which influence the sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence (both quantity and
quality factors covered)
1. The assessment of audit risk involved.( more risk = more evidence required )
2. The nature of the accounting and internal control systems. ( Weak Controls = More
evidence required)
3. The materiality of the item involved.(E.g. Stock ,fixed assets and debtors are
material items in the F/S)
4. The auditor’s past and current knowledge and experience of the business.
5. The source and reliability of the information available (from 3rd parties or M.I.S of
the company)
6. Size of the organization (a small company is less likely to have as tight control as a large
organization) = more evidence
7. The sampling method that the auditor will use to obtain the audit evidence because the chosen
method will also affect the size of the audit sample.
1. Evidence is more reliable when it is obtained from independent sources outside the
entity.(i.e. 3rd party confirmations )
2. Evidence that is generated internally is more reliable when the related controls
imposed by the entity are effective (e.g. Evidence obtained from Unilever,
Siemens).
3. Written evidence (documented) is more reliable than verbal evidence
4. Evidence obtained directly by E. Auditors is more reliable.
5. Original documents are more reliable than photocopies etc
There are 02 methods to obtain audit evidence or say that Audit evidence can be gathered by the
following two methods:
Design: Design test means to ensure that the system is properly designed i.e. proper accounting
system is designed or in place or that proper internal controls are designed to ensure
that material misstatements will be detected.
Operation: This test means to check that whether the controls were operating effectively
throughout the period or not
These tests are to obtain audit evidence to detect material misstatements in the financial statements.
Definition of S.P:
Substantive procedures (or substantive tests) are procedures performed by the auditor to detect material
misstatement (either via fraud or error) at the assertion level.
Assertion Level
P&L, B/S and P&D items.
Substantive Analytical procedures (ratio analysis and comparison analysis from last year to the
current year ) to be discussed in detail in ISA 520
Other substantive procedures (Tests of Details) such as tests of detail of transactions and balances
e.g.
(Verification of documents such as purchase orders, invoices, receipts, employee time sheets,
customer orders, letters, bank statements, contracts and other legal documents, review of minutes of
director meetings and other committees)
Audit Procedures
1. Inspection of Assets:
By inspection of assets we mean that External Auditor verifies/ inspects the Inventory (Raw Material
/ W.I.P / Finished Goods) and tangible assets of the Company. External Auditor also verifies /
counts cash in hand at the Balance Sheet date.
Normally External Auditor physically counts the inventory / Fixed Assets and cash in hand at the
end of Financial Year (Balance Sheet Date)
2. Inspection of Records:
By inspection of records we mean verifying or inspecting the following documents of the Audit client.
Invoices
Purchase Orders
Bank Reconciliations
General Ledger
Good Receive Note (GRN)
Bank Statements
Cash book
Supplier statements
Delivery Challan etc.
3. Inquiry:
By inquiry we mean verifying / obtaining information from client personally e.g. obtaining
information from senior Management (e.g. GM finance, Internal Auditor, CEO, CFO & other
relevant personnel), as the External Auditor thinks appropriate.
This inquiry can be done from people outside the organization e.g. external lawyer / consultants &
other experts.
4. Re-performance:
By re-performance we mean performing the procedures / calculation by External Auditor’s own
methodologies (E.g. re-performing the calculation of depreciation & amortization & re-performing
the Provision for doubtful debt for the year).
5. Re-calculation:
By re-calculation we mean simply re-calculation / rechecking the calculations done by the client e.g.
re-checking the totaling of depreciation & amortization and re-calculating the total of bank
reconciliation.
6. Observation:
In this procedure, External Auditor simply observes a process being performed by others (E.g.
Observing the inventory counting process and cash counting process and observing the process of
inspection of inventory on arrival in the factory.
8. Analytical Procedures:
Definition and explanation will be covered when covering ISA 520 separately
a. Assertion about classes of transactions, events, and related disclosures, for the
period under audit: ( P&L Items)
i. Occurrence ------- transactions and events that have been recorded or disclosed, have occurred, and
such transactions and events pertain to the entity.
(eg Sales and Purchases during the year have occurred and that the transactions actually took
place during the year, expenses that are recorded also occurred during the year………)
ii. Completeness ------- all transactions and events that should have been recorded have been
recorded, and all related disclosures that should have been included in the financial statements
have been included.
(expenses have been recorded completely and all sales that occurred during the year have been
recorded completely recorded in the F/S )
iii. Accuracy ------- amounts relating to recorded transaction and events have been recorded
appropriately.
(Sales, purchases and expenses have been recorded at the accurate amounts & Debtors and
creditors have been accurately recorded in the B/S)
iv. Cutoff------- transactions and events have been recorded in the correct accounting period.
(Sales and purchases have been recorded in the correct accounting period and expenses pertain to
the current year)
v. Classification ------- transactions and events have been recorded in the proper accounts (Expenses
have been classified in the correct G.L and there is no misclassification Depreciation and Rent
expense have been correctly classified in the correct G.L).
vi. Presentation ------- transaction and events are appropriately, aggregated or disaggregated and
clearly described and related disclosures are as per the applicable financial reporting framework.
(Fixed assets and inventory exists in the company’s warehouse and debtors exist at the balance
sheet date.)
ii. Right and obligations ------- the entity holds or controls the rights to assets and liabilities are the
obligation of the entity
(Company has right to use cash, right to use fixed assets, the company has the right to receive
amount from debtors and trade payables and Loans are its obligation to pay)
iii. Completeness ------- all assets, liabilities and equity interests that should have been recorded have
been recorded, and all related disclosures that should have been included in the financial
statements have been included.
(All Assets and liabilities have been completely recorded in the F/S)
iv. Accuracy, valuation and allocation ------- assets, liabilities, and equity interests have been included
in the financial statements at appropriate amounts and any resulting valuation or allocation
adjustment have been appropriately recorded, and related disclosures have been appropriately
measured and described
(Debtors and creditors are recorded at accurate closing amounts and valuation or allocation of
any provisions (other adjustments) are also accurately recorded at the b/s date.)
v. Classification ------- assets, liabilities and equity interests have been recorded in the proper
accounts
(All assets and liabilities have been classified accordingly i.e. between current and non-current
assets and between current and non-current liabilities)
ACCA Questions
ICAP Questions
Required
a. Describe the factors which will influence the auditor's judgement concerning the sufficiency of audit
evidence obtained
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer 71:
a. Factors concerning the sufficiency of audit evidence
(Plz learn from my Handout of ISA 500)
Source of evidence
The auditor will be concerned about the source of the evidence, that is, whether it is generated by the
entity being audited or by a third party or if it is auditor-generated evidence.
Required:
List FOUR factors that influence the reliability of audit evidence
Answer:
a. Reliability of audit evidence
Reliability is influenced by source and the nature of the information, including the controls over its
preparation and maintenance. Four specific factors that influence reliability are:
Audit Evidence from external sources is more reliable than that obtained from the entity’s
records because it is from an Independent source.
Evidence obtained directly by auditors is more reliable than that obtained indirectly
Evidence in form of documents (paper or electronic) or written representations reliable than more
reliable than oral representations can be retracted.
Answer:
Reliability of audit evidence is dependent on the following factors:
Audit evidence is more reliable when it is obtained from independent sources outside the entity
under audit.
Internally generated audit evidence is more reliable when the related controls are effective.
Audit evidence obtained directly by the auditor is more reliable than audit evidence obtained
indirectly or by inference.
Audit evidence is more reliable when it exists in documentary form.
Audit evidence provided by original documents is more reliable than audit evidence provided by
photocopies
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAP CAF 8 Sept 2010 (4 marks)
Question 7
Explain the term “Sufficient and Appropriate Audit Evidence.”
Answer:
The sufficiency and appropriateness of audit evidence are interrelated.
a. Briefly describe the steps that an auditor should take in order to establish whether preconditions of an
audit are present. (ISA 210)
(6 marks)
b. Briefly explain any six methods for collecting audit evidence. (12 marks)
Answer:
a) Steps that an auditor should take in order to establish whether preconditions of an audit are
present:
In order to establish whether the preconditions for an audit are present, the auditor shall:
Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the
financial statements is acceptable, and
Recomputation:
Recomputation technique is applied to prove arithmetical accuracy of a transaction and to
verify that the computation is in accordance with the rules, procedures and acceptable
practices. The areas where recomputation techniques are generally applied include
depreciation commutations. bonus calculations, provision etc.
Enquiry:
Enquiry consists of seeking information from knowledgeable persons, both financial and
non-financial, within the entity or outside the entity. The enquiry may not provide
conclusive audit evidence but it may give some form of clue which may lead to further
verification.
Analytical Procedures
Analytical procedures consist of evaluations of financial information through analysis of
plausible relationships among financial as well as non-financial data. Analytical procedures
also encompass investigation of identified fluctuations or relationships that are inconsistent
with other relevant information or that differ from expected values by a significant amount.
Engagement
Letter
Contents of an Engagement
Letter
Extra Point:
Provision of all necessary information to be provided by Management including management
representations (ISA 580 – will be discussed later)
In the case of recurring audits, the auditor should consider whether circumstances require the
terms of the engagement to be revised and whether there is a need to remind the client of the
existing terms of the engagement. The auditor may decide not to send a new engagement letter
every year.
1. Any indication that the client misunderstands the objective and scope of the
engagement.
2. Any revision of terms of the engagement or introduction of special terms.
3. (scope widened or any special requests by the client increasing the audit work)
4. A recent change of senior management or board of directors, or in ownership. (New
CFO)
5. A significant change in the nature or size of the client’s business.
6. (Subsidiary acquired)
7. Any new significant legal/regulatory/Financial reporting framework/other
requirement (Engagement letter required every year)
8. Change in ownership. (Takeover by Parent company)
In addition to the above, the auditor may feel that it is appropriate to include additional points in the
engagement letter, such as:
more details on the scope of the audit, such as reference to applicable legislation, regulations, ISAs,
ethical requirements.
the form of any other communication of results of audit engagement. (Other deliverables)
the requirement for the auditor to communicate key audit matters in the auditor’s report in
accordance with ISA 701
the fact that because of the inherent limitations of an audit, and the inherent limitations of internal
control, there is an unavoidable risk that some material misstatements may not be detected even
though the audit was properly planned and performed in accordance with ISAs; E.g.:
arrangements regarding the planning and performance of the audit, including the composition of the
audit team;
the expectation that management will provide written representations;(ISA 580)
the expectation that management will provide access to all information that is relevant to the
preparation of the financial statements and its disclosures
The agreement of management to make available to the auditor draft financial statements, including
all information relevant to their preparation, whether obtained from within or outside of the general
and subsidiary ledgers (including all information relevant to the preparation of disclosures), and the
other information if any, in time to allow the auditor to complete the audit in accordance with the
proposed timetable. Eg:
the basis on which fees are computed and any billing arrangements;
a request for management to acknowledge receipt of the engagement letter and to agree to its terms;
arrangements concerning the involvement of other auditors, predecessor auditor, experts (ISA 620)
or internal auditors (or other staff of the entity) Eg:
any restriction of the auditor’s liability when such possibility exists (where our
liability is excluded)
Any obligations to provide audit working papers to other parties. (keeping in view the
requirements of confidentiality.
(The entity might then ask for the audit engagement to be changed to a review engagement to
avoid a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.)
Factors to be considered by the Auditor before accepting the change in terms of engagement
1. Contractual and legal implications of the change
2. Justification by mgmt. / otherwise for changing the terms of the engagement.
3. The information given by mgmt. / TCWG for the change
ISA 210 requires the auditor to consider the justification for the request and whether it is
“reasonable”.
Steps that the auditor can take, if he is unable to agree to a change in terms of engagement
letter.
2. External auditor to discuss the matter with management and explain the circumstances
with respect to change in terms
3. If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of terms he should withdraw (i.e. Resign) from
the engagement (where possible under applicable law) and
4. Consider whether there is any obligation (contractual or otherwise) to report the
circumstances to other parties such as those charged with governance, owners or regulators
(SECP & ICAP)
Answer:
In order to establish whether the preconditions for an audit are present, I will:
i. determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of financial
statements is acceptable;
ii. obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility:
for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework.
for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
to provide us with all relevant and requested information and unrestricted access to all
personnel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAP CAF 8 March 2017 (4 marks)
Question 6 a
List any four situations that may require revision in the terms of audit engagement letter.
Answer:
Situations that may require revision in the terms of engagement letter are as follows:
Any indication that the entity misunderstands the objectives and scope of the audit;
Any revised or special terms of the audit;
A recent change in the senior management/ ownership;
A significant change in nature or size of the entity’s business;
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer:
To establish if the preconditions for an audit are present, the auditor shall:
establish if the financial reporting framework to be used in the preparation of the financial
statements is acceptable; and
obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility (the
‘premise’):
for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial
reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation;
for internal controls to ensure that the financial statements are not materially misstated; and to
provide the auditor with all relevant and requested information and unrestricted access to all
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Required:
List the matters (related to the given scenario only) which you would like to include in the engagement
letter, along with their justification.
Answer:
Matters to be included in engagement letter
Being the first year of audit for our firm, arrangements concerning the involvement of predecessor
auditor would be necessary.
Use of auditor’s expert may be required as RRL has changed its accounting policy from historical
cost convention to revaluation model.
Due to strict deadlines:
It should be included in the engagement letter that management would make available the draft
financial statements along with all relevant information in time to allow for the completion of
audit in accordance with the proposed time table.
We need to communicate the planning and performance of the audit, including the composition
of the audit team.
We may also consider using RRL’s internal audit department and this fact may have to be
communicated through the engagement letter.
Judgments about materiality are made in the light of surrounding circumstances and are affected by the
size or nature of a misstatement or a combination of both
EXPLANATION
The assessments of what is material is ultimately a matter of the auditor’s professional judgment, and is
affected by the auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users and the perceived level of
risk; the higher the risk, the lower will be the level of overall materiality.
(IMP)
In assessing materiality, the auditor to consider that a number of errors each with a small value may, when
aggregated, may amount to a material misstatement.
The assessment of what is material is ultimately is a matter of auditors professional judgement and is affected by the
auditors perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial statement
PERFORMANCE MATERIALITY
When establishing the overall Audit Strategy (in chapter # 3 ISA 300), the auditor shall determine
materiality for the F/S as a whole (called Planning materiality –P.M).If in the specific circumstances of
the entity, there is one or more particular classes of transaction, account balances for which
misstatements of lesser amounts than materiality for the financial statements as a whole….. are expected
to influence the users of the F/S……. than External auditor shall also calculate Performance
Materiality.
The auditor will set performance materiality, which is LOWER than materiality for the financial
statements as a whole. Performance materiality is defined……. as the amount less than materiality for
the financial statements as a whole. Performance materiality is normally set at a lower level than overall
materiality and is used for testing individual transactions, account balances and disclosures.
As per ISA 320 ‘MATERILITY is often calculated using benchmarks such as 5% of PBT or 1% of gross revenue,
these are starting points for the auditor to calculate materiality.
(Performance Materiality or Tolerable Error –T.E --- is normally 50% of planning materiality).
For testing particular class of transactions (P&L Items), account balances (B/S Items), we further
calculate Tolerable error (Performance Materiality) which is normally 50% of planning materiality ---------
in our example it will be 250K)
Balance Sheet as on Dec 31,2017
IMP
However, note that, even if an item is below performance materiality, auditor may still perform audit
procedures by performing analytical procedures + Inquiry from the audit client.
Remember: The levels of materiality may be revised during the course of the audit and this may result in
further audit procedures (CAIRO) being performed by the auditor.
It is a matter of professional judgment for the External Auditor to decide the benchmark
Following factors are considered when identifying an appropriate benchmark:
Nature of entity (e.g. if profit oriented, materiality will be based on net profit but if not-for-profit,
materiality will be based on total assets/expenses)
Which items are focused by shareholders (e.g. for banks… users focus on total assets otherwise its
PBT)
Volatility of benchmark / variable (the less volatile, the better it is for an external auditor)
QUANTITATIVE MATERIALITY
Planning and
Performance Materiality
QUALITATIVE MATERIALITY
Failure to disclose a lawsuit against the company by its customers when it is likely that the
consequent imposition of penalty will significantly impair operating capability and will raise going
concern issue for the company in the near future….
CONCEPTUAL ERROR:
Typically, a conceptual error is one where the amount is incorrectly treated even though the amount is
correct. For example, a non-current asset purchased has been written off to profit and loss completely
in the year of purchase rather than being Capitalized and then depreciated over its useful life
Similarly….. treating finance lease as operating lease and vice versa and the amount is immaterial in
the context of F/S as a whole …
IMP
Why the External Auditor does needs to consider Materiality??
External Auditor needs to consider the level of materiality at the following stages / phases of an audit:
a) At the Planning Stage / Risk assessment stage and during the audit (ISA 300)
In deciding where audit attention will be more focused, the auditor will plan to spend more audit time
(perform more substantive procedures) on areas which are material and are more risky in the F/S.
And will than perform more audit procedures to obtain S.A.A.E in respect of material balances.
Explanation
The auditor needs to consider whether the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements is material, if the
auditor concludes that the aggregate is material, the auditor needs to consider reducing the risk by
extending the audit procedures and requesting management to adjust the financial statements. (E.g. total
of uncorrected misstatements exceed Planning materiality………. this is material now and auditor should
propose adjustments in the F/S to the Management and mgmt. must make adjustment to the F/S)
If management refuses to adjust the financial statements and the results of extended audit procedures DO NOT
enable the auditor to conclude…… that the aggregate of uncorrected misstatements is not material (i.e its material..!
), than the auditor should consider the appropriate modification to the audit OPINION…
Can the External Auditor Revise the Planning and Performance Materiality during
the audit?
ICAP Questions
ACCA Questions
Answer
Performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality for the
financial statements as a whole or at less than the materiality level for particular classes of transactions,
account balance or disclosures.
Performance materiality is set to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate
of uncorrected and undetected misstatements in the financial statements or in classes of transactions,
account balance or disclosures exceeds the materiality as a whole.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer:
The following can be the benchmark for determining materiality:
Gross profit
Total expenses
Total equity
Total assets
Total revenue
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are the training manager in a firm of chartered accountants. Prepare brief presentation for newly
inducted trainees, on the following:
c. Materiality and Performance Materiality. (5 marks )
Answer
c. Materiality:
Information is material if its omission or misstatement could influence the economic decisions of users
taken on the basis of financial statements. The auditor keeping in view the concept of materiality gives
his opinion i.e. whether the financial statements present fairly in all material respects the financial
position and performance of the entity.
Performance Materiality:
Performance materiality means the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less than materiality for the
financial statements as a whole to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate
of uncorrected and undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.
If applicable, performance materiality also refers to the amount or amounts set by the auditor at less
than the materiality level or levels for particular classes of transactions, account balances or disclosures.
Performance materiality recognizes the fact that errors/omissions detected in a particular area may not
breach the overall materiality level but when all the errors/omissions in all the areas is combined or
added together, the overall materiality could be breached.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISA 320 Materiality in Planning and Performing an Audit provides guidance on the concept of materiality in
planning and performing an audit.
Required:
Define materiality and determine how the level of materiality is assessed.
Answer
Materiality is defined as follows:
In assessing the level of materiality there are a number of areas that should be considered. Firstly the
auditor must consider both the amount (quantity) and the nature (quality) of any misstatements, or a
combination of both. The quantity of the misstatement refers to the relative size of it and the quality
refers to an amount that might be low in value but due to its prominence could influence the user’s
decision, for example, directors’ transactions.
In assessing materiality the auditor must consider that a number of errors each with a low value may
when aggregated amount to a material misstatement.
The assessment of what is material is ultimately a matter of the auditors’ professional judgement, and it is
affected by the auditor’s perception of the financial information needs of users of the financial statements.
In calculating materiality the auditor should also consider setting the performance materiality level. This
is the amount set by the auditor, it is below materiality, and is used for the particular classes of
transactions, account balances and disclosures.
As per ISA 320 materiality is often calculated using benchmarks such as 5% of profit before tax or 1% of
gross revenue. These values are useful as a starting point for assessing materiality.
Student Notings
1. Define working papers & explain the benefits / objectives of working papers
/ audit documentation?
2. List the advantages of working papers / audit documentation?
3. Explain permanent audit file & list the contents of a permanent audit file?
4. List the features / _______________/______________ of a good working
paper?
5. List the contents of working paper file / audit documentation?
6. Explain the factors that may affect the form & content of working papers?
7. Explain the term standardized & automated working papers? Explain with
examples.
8. Briefly explain current audit file & list the contents of a current audit file?
9. Briefly explain the difference between permanent & temporary working
papers with examples?
10. Identify and explain errors in the above working paper extract?
11. List the advantages of automated working papers?
On a timely basis,
should be such detailed and complete enough so that it is useful for another auditor in the next
year (Other audit team from the same audit firm) that has no previous experience with the audit or
the audit of such an organization,
to provide understanding of the work performed during the audit.
To drive conclusions drawn from the audit procedures performed
(Remember: It’s the professional judgment of the Auditor to decide what to include and what not to
include in the working papers…! )
Note: Working papers not to include documents that have been superseded/ replaced by new and
corrected working papers + W.Ps are not a substitute for oral explanations by the client (though they
provide clarification)
Information obtained during the audit for understanding the entity and its environment
(___________)
Information and documentation of the internal control system of the audit client.
Extracts or copies of important legal document (____________________________________ )
Documentation for making audit strategy
Determination of materiality level (cutoff for testing transactions– chapter 6)
Analysis of significant transactions & balances.( e.g Inventory and Receivables) and key ratios
Substantive procedures performed during the audit __________
Engagement letter for the year ( )
Management letter (or Management Report)
3rd party confirmations dispatched during the audit (Debtors / creditors etc and their replies)
Key agreements and contracts. ( ________________________________)
Important calculations like depreciation, amortization etc
Copies of financial statements (Draft and Final accounts)
Auditor’s report for the current year
Written representations received from the audit client.________
Working papers should clearly identify the following: (also called Features of Working
Papers)
Please Learn!
Name of the client
Year end (B/S Date)
Subject (Account head of B/S or P&L)
Objective of the work done (F/S Assertion)
Who performed the work & date (Audit Junior/Senior)
Who reviewed the work & date (Audit Manager and the Partner)
Identification of audit procedures carried out (e.g Inspection of assets etc.)
Any issues identified
Conclusion / key points of the work performed (was the audit evidence obtained, satisfactory or
not)
T-casting checked
TT-cross casting checked
G.L-verified from G.L
C - Confirmation dispatched
¢ - calculation checked & P – Physically observed (Any tick can be used by the
auditor)
In the case of recurring audits ,some working paper files may be classified as ‘permanent ‘ audit files
which contain information of continuing importance and are updated with the new information every
year.(after every audit )
Others are classified as ‘current’ audit files which contain information relating primarily to the audit
of that particular period ( period of audit ), which means that all audit evidence and documentation
done for that particular year is filed in the current audit file.(Current audit files are maintained every
year for each client)
Retention and Confidentiality of working papers Audit working papers are the property of External
auditors and should therefore be properly retained for the number of years by them as per the local
requirements or the audit firms practice.
(ISA recommends min 5 Yrs --- from the date of report) (Local laws states: 10 yrs )
Similarly the responsibility of the confidentiality of the audit working papers is also of the External
auditors. However, certain working papers may be given (copies) to the audit client, at their request,
but these are not a substitute of clients working papers/accounting records.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Automated and Standardized working papers
Automated working paper packages have been developed which can make the documentation of audit
work much easier. They make preparation of working papers, lead schedules more easy.
Automated W. papers =either prepared via Microsoft Office tools (Ms. Word and Excel) or any Audit
Software (to be discussed in C.A.A.T)
Introduction to Planning:
The auditor should plan an audit so that the engagement will be performed in an effective manner.
Planning an audit involves establishing the overall audit strategy for the engagement and developing
an audit plan.
Planning involves the engagement partner and other key members of the engagement team to benefit
from their experience and insight (understanding) and to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of
the planning process.
Advantages / Benefits of Planning/Need for Planning
The audit strategy should consider the main characteristics of the engagement which defines its scope.
1. Understanding the entity and its environment (Banking / Trading or Manufacturing Industry) /
The nature of business
2. The applicable financial reporting framework (relevant Int. Accounting standards or any other acc.
stands) on which the F/S to be audited has been prepared.
3. The availability of key client personnel & internal auditors (if any)
4. The expected audit coverage. (Sample coverage)
5. Use of Experts eg Lawyers and service organizations (eg Payroll services are outsourced)
6. Whether C.A.A.T will be used and its effect on audit procedures
ACCA Questions
Audit Risk (A.R) = Risk of Material Misstatement (R.O.M.M) * Detection Risk (D.R)
Audit Risk
Changing the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures (to be discussed in future)
Inherent Risk
Inherent risk is the risk that items in the F/S may be misstated as a result of their inherent
characteristics/ feature.
When inherent risk is high, this means that there is a high risk of misstatement of an item in the
financial statements. (P& L, B/S or P&D)
Inherent Risk is the susceptibility of an assertion about a class of transaction, account balance or
disclosure to a misstatement which could be material, either individually or when aggregated with
other misstatements, before consideration of any related controls.
Examples of Inherent risk (I.R):
E.g. 1: A company in the cement industry operates in a volatile and high-risk environment, and items
in its financial statements are more likely to be misstated than items in the financial statements of
companies in a more low-risk environment, such as a service industry.
Control Risk (C.R)
Control Risk is the risk that a misstatement which could occur in assertion about a class of transaction,
account balance or disclosures and which could be material, either individually or when aggregated
with other misstatements, will not be prevented, or detected and corrected, on a timely basis by the
entity’s internal control.’
Examples of Control Risk (C.R):
1. Possibility of human errors/mistakes. (wrong punching of sales invoices)
2. Collusion between employees. (employees conducting fraud together)
3. Management override of controls.
4. Inadequate/inappropriate SOP’s/Deficiencies in Internal Controls.
5. Non-Routine transactions. (Procuring assets on Leasing)
6. Lack of Qualified & inexperienced Staff.
7. Changes in Key Personnel (E.g. CFO, Senior Manager Finance etc).
8. Changes in I.T Environment (Change of software).
The initial assumption should be that control risk is very high, and that existing internal controls are
insufficient to prevent the risk of material misstatement.
The risk that the procedures performed by the auditor to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level
will not detect a misstatement that exists and that could be material, either individually or when
aggregated with other misstatements.
Detection risk is the risk that the EXTERNAL AUDITOR’s procedures will fail to detect
a MATERIAL misstatement in a transaction or in an account balance
Detection risk can be lowered by carrying out more tests/ procedures in the audit. For example, to
reduce the detection risk from 10% to 5%, the auditor should carry out more tests. (MORE
PROCEDURES)
In other words, the detection risk can be managed by the auditor in order to control the overall audit
risk. Inherent risk and Control risk CANNOT be controlled by the external auditor
Examples of Detection Risk (D.R)
1. First year of audit
2. No past Audit experience of the audit client
3. Integrity of Management (We cannot trust the Management representations /statements)
4. Unreliable data and information (The Information System of the client is not
reliable)
D.R can be INCREASED by OR say Factors that increase D.R:
1. Inadequate planning by the External Auditor
2. Inappropriate assignment of personnel to the engagement team
3. Failure in applying professional skepticism during the Audit
4. Inadequate supervision and review
5. Incorrect sampling techniques (ISA 530)
6. Inappropriate/incorrect sample size
D.R is the risk that audit procedures performed by the External Auditor will fail to detect material
misstatement. It relates to the inability of the auditor to examine all evidence. Audit Evidence is
usually persuasive rather than conclusive (covered in Basic concepts) therefore some D.R will
always exist, allowing the external auditor to seek/express reasonable level of assurance.
Conclusion:
The auditor’s inherent and control risk assessment influences the extent of substantive procedures
required to reduce the D.R and thereby reducing the audit risk to an acceptably low level. D.R
however, can only be reduced and not eliminated, because of the inherent limitations of an audit.
Accordingly, some D.R will always exist.
3. Increase in research & development cost (IAS 38)/Expenditure on Brands incurred during the year
e.g. Costs capitalized as development costs.
RISKS: There is a risk of incorrect classification between research and development expenditure
as per IAS 38, resulting in both I.A and profit being over stated and understated.
In case, question ONLY mentions that cost has been capitalized as development costs than in that
case ……. There is a risk of overstatement of Intangible asset and overstatement of profit.
4. Various provisions made during the year e.g. Provision for lawsuit / warranty or restructuring
RISK: There is a risk that because of wrong estimates and judgement (both Intentional and
unintentional), provision could be both undervalued or overvalued in the F/S.
5. There are pending cases against the company OR new cases filed on the Co. during the year OR
The sector in which the company operates is highly regulated / Fines Penalties might be imposed
on the organization.
RISK: There is a risk of completeness of provisions or inadequate or no disclosure in the F/S as
per IAS 37.
(If it is probable that company will make a payment, a provision is required. If the payment is
possible rather than probable, a contingent liability disclosure would be necessary.
b) There is a risk of provision being over / under valued and risk of inadequate or no
disclosure in the F/S as per IAS 37.
11. Bank loan has loan covenants attached, plus the company is facing cash flow problems or faces
liquidity issues.
RISK: There is a risk that if these loan covenants (profit or assets targets) are breached and the
loan becomes repayable immediately than the company will face going concern risk. (ISA 570)
In addition, there is a risk of manipulation of profits and net assets to ensure that bank covenants
are met.
12. Interest / Finance cost increased during the year because of increase in bank loan.
RISK: There is a risk that interest costs will be understated to manipulate profits especially if there
are profit based bonuses for senior management.
13. Introduction of new accounting software during the period and run in parallel during the year
RISK: There is risk of data being lost & balances being misstated if they have not been transferred
completely and accurately, therefore there is a risk of overall R.O.M.M in the F/S.
14. Senior management joins the organization with different prior experience (CFO has joined a
BANK who was previously CFO in a pharmaceutical company)
RISK: There is a risk that there will be overall errors in making judgements and estimates leading
to overall R.O.M.M in the F/S
17. New product has been manufactured by the company but it won’t be allowed to be sold by the
company or its expected that a new law will be imposed which will stop the sales of the product.
RISK: There is risk of going concern for the company plus if stock is not written
down than profit and inventory will be overstated.
18. Top Management/Senior Management from the finance dept. has left the Company very close to
the balance sheet date.
RISK: There is an inherent risk of increased work load for the finance team resulting in
control risks (C.R) for the auditor leading to misstatements in the F/S.
IMP
20. Receivables balance is increasing over the years as compared to last year or collection in days has
increased as compared to last year.
RISK: There is a risk that if receivables are not recoverable and adequate provisioning is not done
than debtors will be overvalued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. Out of court settlement with the customers / suppliers (before or after the B/S date)
RISK: There is a risk that resulting provision or liability will be over or under valued. (also termed
as completeness of provisions and disclosures)
24. Proper disclosures as per I.F.R.S or local laws are required in the F/S
RISK: There is a risk of incorrect or inadequate disclosures in the F/S.
27. Risk of improper/ incorrect classification between current and non-current assets, current and non-
current liabilities.
34. Sudden decrease in Admin expenses without any change in company’s operations.
RISK: There is a risk of profit being overstated.
35. Company has Intangible assets under IAS 38 (Patent, license, Franchise etc.)
RISK: There is a risk that if treatment is not done as per IAS 38 than both Intangible assets and
profits could be over/under stated.
INVENTORY
36. Assets/Inventory ordered/procured with no certainty that they will be received at the yearend or
not.
RISK: There is a risk of inaccurate cutoff leading to stock/purchases and payables both being
overstated at the B/S date.
OR there is a risk that if inventory / fixed assets are recorded before they physically exist than both
inventory / fixed assets and payables will be over-stated in the F/S.
IMP
37. There are various locations / stores for inventory counting at the B/S date and company / client
management is willing to get 100 per % stock counted at the B/S date.
Please note :100% verification of inventory at all locations is not always practically possible for the
external auditor.
RISK: There is a risk that auditor will not be able to obtain S.A.A.E over the existence and
completeness of inventory locations not visited by the auditor at the B/S date.
38. Company values its inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost includes both
production and general overheads.
RISK: If general overheads are included in inventory cost, then this will result in inventory being
over-valued.
40. The company is planning to undertake the full year-end inventory count after the B/S date and
then adjust for inventory movements from the year end.
RISK: If the adjustments are not completed accurately, then the year-end inventory could be
under or over-valued.
41. Stock returned after / or before the B/S date being damaged or expired or product recalled by the
company. (inventory was at the B/S date)
RISK: There is a risk that if inventory is not valued as per IAS 2 then closing stock would be
overvalued plus refunds will need to be made to the customers and sales will have to be reversed,
which if not done, then revenue will be overstated and liabilities will be understated.
42. Closing stock balance has increased as compared to last year. (or turnover in days have increased)
RISK: There is a risk that stock is old fashioned / or out of demand and not being sold resulting in
its NRV being lower than cost and if not adjusted as per IAS 2, will result in closing stock being
overvalued.
44. Useful life of assets or depreciation rates have been reassessed or reviewed by the management
during the year.
RISK: There is a risk that this has been done to manipulate the profits or to achieve some kind of
profit targets resulting in profit and PPE being overstated.
45. Contingent assets as per IAS 37 should only be recorded when virtually certain.
RISK: There is a risk that assets are not virtually certain and are recorded as assets resulting in
assets being overvalued in the F/S.
To comply with IAS 37 contingent assets should not be recognized until the receipt is virtually
certain. If recorded there is a risk of assets and profits being over-stated.
46. The client is requesting to complete the audit early quickly than last year.
RISK: This will result in detection risk for the external auditor plus there will be less time for the
finance team to prepare the financial statements leading to an inherent risk that F/S will me be
materially misstated.
47. Bank reconciliations are not made on timely basis.
RISK: There is a risk that differences will not be reconciled resulting in the risk of bank balances
being over /under valued.
48. Physical stock is not reconciled with General ledger or book records.
RISK: There is a risk that closing stock could be over/under valued.
50. New technology has been introduced by the company because of which old & existing P & M have
been impaired.
RISK: There is a risk that if impairment treatment is not done as per IAS 36 than both P & M and
profits will be overstated.
51. Sales ledger and creditors ledger were closed 10 days after the B/S date
RISK: There is a risk of incorrect cutoff in both sales and purchases leading to over / under sales
and debtors as well as purchases and payables.
52. No supplier statement or purchase ledger control account reconciliations have been performed
during the period.
RISK: There is an increased risk of errors within trade payables and the year-end payables balance
may be under or over-valued.
53. A patent / franchise has been purchased by the company for X no of years and if the management
has expensed the full amount in the current year P&L than…..
RISK: There is a risk that as the sum has been fully expensed and not treated in accordance with
IAS 38 than both intangible assets and profits are understated.
(In accordance with IAS 38 Intangible Assets, this should have been included as an intangible asset
and amortized over its useful life accordingly )
54. The company has raised new finance / equity through issuing of shares at a premium. This needs to
be treated correctly, with adequate disclosures made and proper allocation between share capital
and share premium in the B/S.
RISK: If this is not done, then there is a risk that accounts may be misstated due to a lack of
disclosure as well as share capital and share premium will be misstated.
55. During the year, company outsourced its ABC department / function to an external service
organization / service provider.
RISK: A detection risk arises as to whether sufficient and appropriate evidence is available at the
audit client to verify the completeness and accuracy of controls over that ABC function /
transactions and balances at the year-end.
56. Because of market competition, selling price has been reduced OR abnormal discounts are given to
customers.
RISK: There is a risk of inventory being over-valued / risk of revenue being over-stated / risk of
profit being over-stated.
The balance of work in progress (WIP) at 30 June 20X5 is $7.6m in respect of the playgrounds under
construction. A WIP count and valuation will be carried out at all the sites on 30 September 20X5.
Arrangements have been made for the audit team to attend only five of the WIP counts. Hart Co offers
its customers a warranty at no extra cost, which guarantees that the playgrounds will function as
expected for a period of three years. The warranty provision for the current year has been calculated as
2% of revenue. In the previous year the warranty was based on 6% of revenue. The finance director has
made this change despite no significant difference in construction techniques or the level of claims in
the year.
Hart Co has incurred expenditure of $1.8m relating to the research and development of a new type of
environmentally-friendly building material. $0.6m of the expenditure to date has been written off to the
statement of profit or loss. The remaining $1.2m has been capitalized as an intangible asset. No
amortization has been recognized to date as the material has not yet been brought into use.
In June 20X5, the company contracted to purchase new machinery costing $2.4m. It paid $1m on
signing the contact to secure the machinery, which was due to be delivered in July 20X5. Due to a
supplier problem, the delivery is delayed and is now scheduled to be delivered in October 20X5. In
order to finance the research and development costs and the machinery purchase, Hart Co made a
rights issue to existing shareholders at a price of $0.75 for each $0.50 share.
Hart Co's payroll function is outsourced to an external service organization, Chaz Co, which is
responsible for all elements of payroll processing and maintenance of payroll records.
Hart Co's directors correctly disclosed their remuneration details in the forecast financial statements in
line with IFRS Standards. However, local legislation in the country in which Hart Co is based, requires
more extensive disclosure. The directors have stated that they consider this onerous and so do not
intend to provide the additional information.
Requirements:
Describe eight audit risks and explain the auditor’s response to each risk in planning the audit of
Hart Co. (16 marks)
1.Debtors / Receivables
Average debtors
Debtors Turn Over = * 365
Credit sales
Comment:
If debtor’s turn over in days has increased as compared to last year and no adequate provision for
doubtful debts has been made than there is a risk that company will be recording debtors that are not
recoverable i.e. There is a risk that debtors have been overvalued in the F/S.
(or say increased Risk of Recoverability of receivables)
(Also refer to the information given in the question e.g. management has increased the credit terms for
their customers…this information will NOW be linked with the debtors turn over in days calculated
from the question)
2.Inventory / Closing stock
Average F goods
Inventory Turn Over = * 365
Cost of goods sold
Comment:
If inventory turnover in days has increased as compared to last year than there is a risk that stock is
becoming obsolete or out of fashion/ or slow moving ….leading to the risk that its NRV will be lower
than its cost & if not valued as per IAS 2 correctly, than closing stock will be overvalued in the F/S
(Also refer to the information given in the question e.g. Closing stock has increased as compared to last
year…this information will NOW be linked with the inventory turnover in days calculated from the
question)
3.Interest Cover
Comment:
If bank covenant is breached & penalty is imposed by the bank than there is a Risk of penalty not being
recorded in the F/S leading to risk of profit being overstated and in the case of contingent liability
(lawsuit filed by the bank )there is a risk of incorrect/inadequate or no disclosure in the F/S.
NOTE: (Also refer to any further information given in the scenario / question)
7. Creditors turnover
Creditors / Trade Payables
Creditors Turn Over = *365
If creditors number of days has decreased as compared to last year and in comparison, sales has
increased in the current year as compared to last year than there is a risk that creditors / trade payables
have been undervalued in the F/S.
Other Noting’s from class lecture
ACCA Questions
1 Q3 c Dec 2010 (covered with Audit Risk & Ratio) 15 marks
2 Q.79 June 2008 20 marks
3 Q.5 a June 2012 3 marks
4 Q.3 b June 2013 15 marks
5 Q.5c Sept/ Dec 2015 3 marks
6 Q.16 Sept/ Dec 2018 3+ 3+ 16 marks
You are the audit senior of White & Co and are planning the audit of Redsmith Co for the year
ended 30 September 2010. The company produces printers and has been a client of your firm for two
years; your audit manager has already had a planning meeting with the finance director. He has
provided you with the following notes of his meeting and financial statement extracts.
Redsmith’s management were disappointed with the 2009 results and so in 2010 undertook a number
of strategies to improve the trading results. This included the introduction of a generous sales-related
bonus scheme for their salesmen and a high profile advertising campaign. In addition, as market
conditions are difficult for their customers, they have extended the credit period given to them.
The finance director of Redsmith has reviewed the inventory valuation policy and has included
additional overheads incurred this year as he considers them to be production related. He is happy
with the 2010 results and feels that they are a good reflection of the improved trading levels.
DRAFT ACTUAL
2010 2009
$m $m
Revenue 23.0 18.0
Cost of Sales (11.0) (10.0)
Gross profit 12.0 8.0
Operating expenses (7.5) (4.0)
Profit before interest and taxation 4.5 4.0
Inventory 2.1 1.6
Receivables 4.5 3.0
Cash — 2.3
Trade payables 1.6 1.2
Overdraft 0.9
Required:
Using the information above: Calculate FIVE ratios, for BOTH years, which would assist the audit
senior in planning the audit; and (5 marks)
From a review of the above information and the ratios calculated, explain the audit risks that arise and
describe the appropriate response to these risks. (10 marks)
The introduction of a sales related bonus. scheme Increase the sample sizes for any substantive sales
may incentivise employees to push post year-end cut off testing and extend the time period from
sales back into the current year, overstating which the sample is selected.
revenue for 2010.
Receivables balances may not be recoverable A review of aged receivable balances should be
given that receivable days have increased by 10 carried out and there will be an increased focus on
days and credit periods for customers have recoverability through extended post year end cash
increased. receipts testing.
The current ratio decreases by 55%, lack of cash Increased emphasis on a detailed going concern
(an overdraft in 2010) and sales increase indicates review. Discussions with management as to the
potential liquidity problems due to overtrading, ability of Redsmith to continue as a going concern
which could impact on the company's ability to and careful attention paid to the post year end
continue as a going concern. period.
Inventory could be overvalued as a result of the Review the inventory calculations to identify the
new policy to include more overheads in overheads included and ensure they are valid
inventory. This is consistent with the 10 day production overheads. Discuss the reasons for
increase in inventory days. including them with the finance
director.
Top tips: Five well explained risks and responses would have been sufficient here, bit you may have
also come up with the following:
Costs of sales may have been omitted or Cost of sales and operating expenses to be
incorrectly included as operating expenses. This compared to prior year and expectations on a line
a. With reference to ISA 520 Analytical Procedures and ISA 315 Identifying and assessing the risks of
material misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment explain:
b. i..what is meant by the term ‘analytical procedures’; (2 marks)
ii..the different types of analytical procedures available to the auditor; and (3 marks)
iii..the situations in the audit when analytical procedures can be used. (3 marks)
Zak Co sells garden sheds and furniture from 15 retail outlets. Sales are made to individuals, with
income being in the form of cash and debit cards. All items purchased are delivered to the customer
using Zak’s own delivery vans; most sheds are too big for individuals to transport in their own motor
vehicles. The directors of Zak indicate that the company has had a difficult year, but are pleased to
present some acceptable results to the members.
The statements of profit or loss for the last two financial years are shown below:
Required:
i. Analytical procedures consist of the analysis of significant ratios and trends including the resulting
investigations of fluctuations and relationships that are inconsistent with other relevant
information or which deviate from predictable amounts.
The consideration of comparisons with similar information for prior periods, anticipated
results of the client from budgets or forecasts, predictions prepared by the auditor, and
industry information
Analytical procedures between elements of financial information that are expected to
conform to a predicted pattern based on the client's experience, such as the relationship of
gross profit to sales
Analytical procedures between financial information and relevant non-financial
information, such as the relationship of payroll costs to the number of employees
Analytical procedures can be used at all stages of the audit, and must be used at:
The planning stage in accordance with ISA 315 identifying and assessing the risks of material
misstatement through understanding the entity and its environment and;
The final review stage in accordance with ISA 520 Analytical procedures.
During the audit planning stage, analytical procedures are used as a risk assessment procedure to
obtain an understanding of the entity and its environment and to help determine the nature, timing
and extent of audit procedures.
Analytical procedures can be used as substantive audit procedures during audit fieldwork when their
use can be more effective or efficient than tests of details in reducing the risk of material misstatement
at the assertion level to an acceptably low level.
Analytical procedures must be used at the final review stage of the audit where they assist the auditor
in forming an overall conclusion as to whether the accounts are consistent with his understanding of
the entity.
b) Zak Co Revenue
Revenue
Although the directors have indicated that the company has had a difficult year, revenue has increased
from the previous year by 18%. The auditors need to establish the reason for this increase as it does
not correlate with the directors' comments.
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Gross profit has increased dramatically by 88% in comparison to the previous year. The reason for this
needs to be examined, given that revenue has increased but cost of sales has decreased.
Administration costs
Administration costs have fallen slightly by 6%.This appears unusual given that revenue has increased
from the previous year, as one would expect the increased revenue to lead to increased administration
costs. Expenditure in this area may be understated perhaps as a result of incorrect cut-off being
applied.
Interest payable
It is surprising that Zak has a reasonable cash surplus this year but still continues to pay a similar level
of interest. The interest payable may be overstated and the reasons for interest payments not
decreasing despite the absence of the large overdrawn balance seen last year must be established. One
explanation for this might be a cash injection immediately prior to the year end.
You have been informed that due to overwhelming response towards adventure trips, number of tour
operators have launched the same services at significantly low prices as compared to APL; however, all
these new tour operators are not following as high safety standards as are being followed by APL.
Considering the increased competition, APL has recently widened its scope of business and introduced:
booking of air tickets and hotel rooms on behalf its clients at a discounted rate. APL is entitled to a
commission, if bookings are made through APL. The commission on booking is recorded when the
payment has been received.
“Book now and Pay later” instalment scheme for all of its services.
Required:
a) Identify the matters that you will consider while obtaining an understanding of APL and its
environment. (5 marks)
b) Identify and discuss the business risks and the related audit risks from the above scenario. (9 marks)
(14 marks)
2. Explain/ discuss the purpose of risk assessment procedures performed by the external auditor at
the planning stage of the audit.
3. What are the sources/ HOW will the external auditor obtain evidence for risk assessment
procedures.
4. Identify sources of information relevant to obtaining / gaining understanding of the audit client
AND describe how this information will be used by the auditor.
5. Explain the procedures to obtain understanding of the entity & its environment as per ISA 315 at
the risk assessment stage.
6. Describe the term significant audit risk and list few examples.
8. Explain the term Audit Risk and briefly explain its components.
10. Explain how detection risk can be controlled / reduced by the external auditor.
Describe / explain (05) audit risks from the given scenario and explain the auditor’s response
to each risk in planning the audit of ABC & co.
From the given scenario / points, categorize between Inherent, control and Detection risk
From the given points / information, classify inherent, control and detection risk between high
and low risk
1. To identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at the financial statement level
2. To identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at the Assertion level
3. To enable the auditor to design and perform further audit procedures in response to risk at the F/S
level
4. To enable the auditor to design and perform further audit procedures in response to risk at the
assertion level.
5. To exercise audit judgment when setting Planning and performance materiality while making audit
strategy.
The auditor is required to identify and assess the risks of material misstatement at both the financial
statement and at the assertion level. (____________________________)
The financial statement level refers to risks which are pervasive to the financial statements as a whole
and which potentially affects many assertions. (For examples refer H.O # 2)
The risk at the assertion level refers to specific risks in P&L, B/S and presentation and disclosure items
in the notes to the accounts. Risk at this level has 02 types. INHERENT RISK and CONTROL RISK.
(For examples refer H.O # 2)
SIGNIFICANT RISK
The auditor should look for factors that could be significant in the F/S and to which particular
attention should be given by the audit team.
In addition, the auditor may also be aware that the client company has a poor track record in
collecting trade receivables. This knowledge of the business might make the auditor reach the
conclusion that the audit should give particular attention to the verification of trade receivables.
Significant risks are COMPLEX or UNUSUAL transactions that may indicate fraud, or other
special risks and these require special audit consideration. As part of the risk assessment
procedures, the auditor shall determine whether any of the risks are significant risks in the F/S.
The following factors indicate that a risk might be significant: Please Learn
1) Risk of fraud (ISA 240)
2) Its relationship with recent accounting or other developments
3) The degree of subjectivity in the financial information (E.g. Provision for Lawsuit)
4) It is an unusual transaction in the F/S (eg. Lease accounting)
5) It is a significant transaction with related party (e.g. Transactions with Parent or subsidiary
companies)
6) The complexity of the transaction (eg Calc of Borrowing costs and Deferred Tax)
The auditor will then focus his work more on balances in the financial statement where he considers
there is significant risk of material misstatement. High risk/significant material items will be audited in
detail, and low risk items will receive less attention.
i.e. (More time on High risky & material items and less time on low risky and immaterial items)
3) RESPONDING TO THE ASSESSED RISK OF MATERIAL MISSTATEMENT
The objective in this regard is to gather adequate appropriate audit evidence about assessed risks of
material misstatement, by designing and putting in place appropriate responses to the assessed risks.
Response at the F/S Level (will be covered in the topic of Fraud- ISA 240
Response at the Assertion Level ------------------By Performing Test of controls,
Substantive Procedures or a combination of both.
ACCA Questions
Required
a) Explain why obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment is important for the
auditor.
Answer:
a) Importance of understanding the entity and its environment
Understanding the entity and its environment (including the entity's internal control), is important
to the auditor because it allows the auditor to:
Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, at both
the assertion and the financial statement level.
Assess the reliance that can be placed on internal control
Design and perform further audit procedures in response to the assessed risks such that
detection and audit risk can be reduced to an acceptable level.
Establish a frame of reference for exercising audit judgement, for example, when setting audit
materiality.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
50 Serenity (6 marks)
(a) ISA 315 Identifying and assessing the risks of material misstatement through understanding the
entity and its environment requires the auditor to perform risk assessment procedures which
include obtaining an understanding of the entity and its environment, including its internal
control.
Required
1) Explain the purpose of risk assessment procedures. (3 marks)
2) Outline the sources of audit evidence the auditor can use as part of risk assessment procedures.
(3 marks)
Answer:
i. Risk assessment procedures are performed at the planning stage of an audit to obtain an
understanding of the entity being audited and to identify any areas of concern which could result
in material misstatements in the financial statements. They allow the auditor to assess the nature,
timing and extent of audit procedures to be performed.
ii. Sources of audit evidence that can be used as part of risk assessment procedures.
Inquiries of management
Prior year financial statements
Current year management accounts and budgets
Analytical procedures
Observation and inspection
Student Notings
Reporting lines.
The chief internal auditor may report to the audit committee and not to the finance director or the chief
accountant.
Economy
Implies the principle of prudence i.e. the least possible cost should be incurred to fulfill any need or say
that resource cost to be kept at minimum or lowest. Attaining the resources/ material at the lowest cost.
(Getting 2 products at Rs 1000 & Rs 950. economy is achieved by purchasing at Rs
950)
Efficiency
Implies the maximization of output input ratio i.e. the output per unit of input should be maximized.
An efficient operation produces maximum output for a given set of input (resources required) or requires
minimum input for a given level of output.
E.g. One Teacher and 150 students & One Teacher and 50 students
Effectiveness
Organization objectives have been achieved.
(E.g. Spending on College, spending on Food Etc.)
Example
Purchasing less expensive raw material (economy) may help maximize the number of units that may be
obtained for a given sum of money (efficiency). This may be at conflict with the desired objective of
high standard of performance for finished goods. (Effectiveness).
IMP
Internal auditors will evaluate these factors for any given business system (function / dept. /
Operation) or product/ service of the company.
V.F.M will be judged by comparison with best systems / products / services and other alternatives
available.
1.
2.
3.
The Primarily Responsibility for establishing & maintaining control in the organization rests with Board of
Directors or say those charged with Governance similarly they are responsible for the prevention and
detection of fraud and error in the organization.
In this respect, internal auditors are responsible for ASSISTING/ HELPING the B.O.D in the
deterrence of fraud/ or prevention and detection of fraud and error, by performing special
investigations and evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of the internal control system in place.
Remember it’s the directors (TCWG) who are wholly responsible for the prevention and detection of fraud
and error in the company.
When assessing the risk of fraud, internal auditors should determine few factors
Are Realistic organizational goals and objectives are set by the management…………
Are their Policies and Procedures to monitor activities and safeguard company assets….
While the internal auditors verify transactions of various operations (called operational audits) they cannot
conduct detailed audit of every transaction (they also work on a sample basis just like external
auditors). Accordingly, the internal auditor CANNOT achieve/ or give an Absolute Assurance that
non-compliance or irregularities do not exist.
(Remember Inherent Limitations are there....and they cannot be eliminated !)
1. Internal Auditor can conduct investigation of any department/function where there is slightest
risk of fraud. (after consent and approval from management)
2. Internal Auditor assess the adequacy & effectiveness of internal controls of the concerned function/
department.
3. Internal auditors can help directors/ senior management identify areas where fraud risks exists by
regular reviews of various operational functions.
4. Internal auditors can help management to develop controls to mitigate against fraud risks.
5. Internal Auditors must be alert for any fraud risk indicators (E.g. Unauthorized/
unapproved transactions, No supporting documents, purchasing from other than
approved vendors, no timely Bank & stock reconciliations, no signatures obtained on
delivery notes from customers, unexplained prices for new customers, Unauthorized
hiring of key employees in the finance department, abnormal credit terms etc.
Reporting of Fraud
When an internal auditor suspect’s wrong doing, the appropriate authorities within the
organization should be informed (i.e. Chief Internal Auditor, Audit Committee and C.E.O)
When the incidence of significant fraud has been established after fraud investigation
(supporting evidence has been gathered), senior management and the board should be notified
immediately.
A written report might be issued at the conclusion of the investigation phase and might be
submitted to legal. counsel (in-house legal dept.) or for any subsequent police investigation, where
relevant.
Internal auditors evaluate the current system and methods/services provided by the companies and then
recommend mgmt. (by recommending new strategies and methodologies) how to achieve best value be it
any department or any product or service of the company)
The most important ingredients of a best value review are explained with the ' 4 Cs'. These four C's are
Challenge, Compare, Consult and Compete.
1. Challenge
Identifies the need of the service and the way it is provided. An entity should discontinue
providing a service if the reason why the service is provided cannot be identified satisfactorily
2. Compare
Compares the attributes of the services provided with those provided by similar organization.
Comparison paves the way for improvements.
3. Consult
Suggests consulting with service users / customers in order to know whether or not the
services provided meet the needs of the consumers.
4. Compete
Encourages fair competition so as to achieve efficient and effective services.
The element of competition enables and paves the way to achieve best value audit.
Rather than having a permanent internal audit presence some organizations have chosen to outsource
the function (acquiring/purchasing the service from a 3rd party/ External Service Provider) such that
they would ‘buy in’ necessary skills as they needed from an external serviceprovider.
Background behind outsourcing is the fact that often companies CAN’T AFFORD to have certain
departments/ functions on a permanent basis e.g.
Cafeteria, Human Resource, repair Maintenance, Internal audit and Payroll functions etc. (mostly those
functions are outsourced that are NOT CORE departments / functions of the organization)
As there are no formal reporting requirements for internal auditors therefore the report may take any
format.
Internal auditors produce reports for directors and management as a result of various operational audits
and other assignments performed.
performed. These reports are internal to the organization and are unlikely to be shared with third parties
other than the external auditors.
Step 1 - Produce Draft Report
First the internal auditors produce a draft internal audit report which is discussed by the relevantmanagement.
Step 2 - Exit meetings
The people at this meeting are likely to include both operational staff from internal audit dept.
operational staff of the department and managers of the relevant dept. along with the manager of the
internal audit dept.
The objectives of this meeting are to:
Discuss the findings and associated recommendations
Provide management with the opportunity to give their views on, and ask for clarification of, the
observations and recommendations allowing any misunderstandings to be resolved.
Agree on possible solutions to the problems the internal audit assignment has identified.
Step 3 - Final Report
Depending on the organization, the final report may take the form of a written report or a PowerPoint
presentation.
TERMS OF REFERENCE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BODY OF THE REPORT (more elaborative)
APPENDIX / ANNEXURES (if required)
ICAP Questions
S. No. Question Attempt Marks
ACCA Questions
3 Q.16 c ACCA March / June 2018 5 marks
The internal audit department is headed by Hina Akram, a Chartered Accountant. She works in close
coordination with CFO and CEO. She prepares audit plan for each quarter by herself. All the internal
audit findings are first discussed at length with both the CFO and the CEO and are then presented to the
audit committee.
Hina’s internal audit team comprises of three members, Usman, Kashif and Amna. Usman is
responsible for the audit of treasury and payments, Kashif is responsible for the audit of procurement,
payables and production and Amna is responsible for the audit of revenues, receivables and assets, for
the last three years. Hina believes that the continued involvement of her team in the same areas has
helped them to develop expertise in their assigned areas. This also helps her and her team to design
internal controls for the above mentioned areas in an effective manner.
Required:
Identify the deficiencies relating to independence of internal audit department and recommend measures
which should be taken to protect the independence.
Answer 5 b:
Reporting lines: Hina works in close coordination with CFO and CEO and also discusses all of the
findings with them. Therefore it seems that the internal audit department is also reporting to CFO and
CEO which would impair its independence. Hina should be directly reporting to the audit committee
rather than going through CEO and CFO.
Deciding the scope of internal audit work: The scope of work carried out by the internal auditors is
solely decided by Hina without the consultation of the audit committee. The scope of internal audit
work should be decided by the audit committee or the chief internal auditor herself with the approval of
the audit committee.
Rotation of internal audit staff: Internal auditor staff has been auditing the same processes for the last
three years. They would have become too familiar with the operations that they audit or the
management responsible for them. To reduce the familiarity threat, internal auditors should be rotated
regularly.
Designing internal controls: The internal audit department is also involved in designing the internal
controls. However, they should not be responsible for the design of internal controls within the entity. If
they did, they would be required to audit their own work, which creates self-review threat. Senior
management in accounting and finance or line management should have responsibility for the design
and implementation of internal controls, taking advice where appropriate from the external auditors
when control weaknesses are identified during the external audit.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer 1 e:
Following factors are considered in determining the independence of internal auditors:
To whom does the internal auditor reports to
Who decides the scope of internal audit work
Frequency of rotation of internal audit staff
Appointing authority of chief internal auditor
Conflict of interest i.e. they should not be responsible for designing internal controls
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
‘Internal Control’
INTERNAL CONTROL
Definition of Internal Control:
An internal control system includes the policies, processes and other aspects of a company that, taken
together:
….Facilitates its effective and efficient operation by enabling it to respond appropriatelyto significant business, operational,
financial, compliance and other risks to achievingthe company’s objectives. This includes the safeguarding of assets from
inappropriate use or from loss and fraud, and ensuring that liabilities are identified and managed.
….Internal control is the PROCESS designed and affected by those charged with governance, management and
other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance about the achievement of the entity’s objectives with regard to reliability of
financial reporting, effectiveness and efficiency of operations and compliance with applicable laws and regulations
...designed and implemented to address identified business risks that threaten the achievement of any of these
objectives.”
Internal control, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide an entity with only about achieving the
entity objectives. The likelihood of achievement is affected by limitations inherent to internal control, these
include:
1. Human Errors ( .)
2. Human Judgment ( )
3. Collusion between employees ( )
4. Cost/Benefit Feasibility or
5. Management override of controls
6. Incompetent staff / mgmt. ( )
E
The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its
people. It is the foundation
n for an effective internal control, resulting in overall internal controls in the
organization. v
i
The control environment
r includes the following elements OR say that control environment can be
evaluated by the following factors
o
n
m
Factors for understanding of the control environment are:
e
n
Control Environment
Communicationtand Essential elements which influence the effectiveness of the design,
enforcement2.of integrity
T implementation and monitoring of controls.
and ethical valuesh ( Eg by Mission and Vision statements of Co.in the annual reports
e etc)
Commitment to Management’s consideration of the competence levels for
competence E the particular jobs and how these can be further enhanced.
n (Hiring and training the best resource)
Participation by tthose Attributes of those charged with governance such as:
charged with governance
i Extent of involvement
t Appropriateness of actions and interactions with internal and
i external auditors
e (Involvement of CEO in all Internal control enforcement
sessions and seminars etc )
s
R
i
Page 117 of 272 Prepared by M. Sajid Kapadia (ACA, FCCA, APFA)
s
k
A
KnS School of Business Studies
ACCA F8 - Audit & Assurance
Summary Notes by SK
Management’s philosophy Approach to taking and managing business risks
and operatingstyle Attitudes and actions towards financial reporting
(selecting prudent acc. Policies )
(Is mgmt. Risk seeker or risk averse?)
Organizational structure The framework, within which an entity’s activities for achieving its
objectives are planned, executed, controlled andreviewed.
(Tall structure or flat structure)
Assignment of authorityand How authority and responsibility for operating activities are assigned and
responsibility how reporting and authorization hierarchies are established.
(there must be proper segregation of duties and proper
delegation to assistants )
If TCWG do not understand that cash is at high risk of being stolen or being misappropriated, they will not
implement controls such as timely banking, cash reconciliations plus timely bank reconciliations etc.
For financial reporting purposes, the entity's risk assessment process includes how management
identifies business risks relevant to the preparation of F/S in accordance with the entity's applicable FRF. It
estimates their significance, assesses the likelihood of their occurrence, and decides upon actions to
respond to and manage them and the results thereof.
Risks in the F/S can arise or change due to circumstances such as:
Controls over computerized Includes General AND Application Controls (page 97 onwards)
applications
Maintaining the arithmetical accuracy For example, checking to see if individual invoices have been
of records added up correctly and Calculations done accurately (done via Ms
Excel or any accounting software)
Maintaining and reviewing control Control accounts bring together transactions in individual ledgers.
accounts and trial balances Trial balances bring together unusual transactions for the
organization as a whole. Preparing these can highlight unusual
transactions or account balances.
Comparing internal data with For example, comparing records of goods dispatched ( )
external sources of information to customers with customers’ acknowledgment of goods that
have been received. Or comparing G.R.N with suppliers invoice
Limiting physical access to assets Only authorized personnel should have access to certain assets
and records (particularly valuable or portable ones) e.g. ensuring that the
inventory stores are properly locked and only authorized store
personnel are allowed access.
Performance Reviews Examples Include :
Comparing actual performance against budget
Comparing actual performance against forecast
Comparing actual performance against prior period performance
Variance analysis and other control reporting for mgmnt
Segregation of Duties Segregation of duties means dividing the work to be done
between two or more individuals, so that the work done by one
individual acts as a check and balance on the work of the others.
This reduces the risk of error or fraud.
If several individuals are involved in the completion of an overall task, this increases the likelihood that
errors will be detected when they are made. It is more difficult for a person to commit fraud, when
there is proper segregation of duties.
5. Monitoring of Controls:
Monitoring of controls is a process to assess the effectiveness of internal control’s performance over time, it
involves assessing controls, on a timely basis and taking necessary corrective actions modified for any
changes in conditions. Management accomplishes monitoring of controls through either ongoing
activities or separate evaluations.
Companies are monitoring these internal controls by the help of Internal Audit Function
(ISA 610)
Few sources of income and uncomplicated activities (Simple Trading of Few Commodities like Sole
proprietorship)
Unsophisticated record keeping (Receipts and payments a/c only)
Limited internal controls
Straightforward or uncomplicated transactions
Few lines of business / few products
Few personnel / employees.
Conclusion
• Narrative notes
• Questionnaires
• Flowcharts
• Checklists
Narrative notes
The purpose of narrative notes is to describe and explain the accounting & internal control system e.g.
Sales and Purchase system.
Narrative notes
Advantages Disadvantages
They are relatively simple to record and can facilitate Describing something in narrative notes can
understanding to all. be a lot more time consuming.
Advantages
Can be prepared quickly.
Flow Charts are fairly easy to follow and to review.
They generally ensure that the system is recorded in its entirety i.e. completely.
Disadvantages
They are ONLY most suitable for describing standard systems.
Major amendment is difficult without redrawing.
Time can sometimes be wasted by charting areas that are of no audit significance.
Internal Control Questionnaires (ICQs) are used to ask whether controls exist which meet specific
control objectives.
Internal Control Evaluation Questionnaires (ICEQs) are used to determine whether there are controls
which prevent or detect specified errors /omissions / Frauds.
They comprise a list of questions designed to determine whether desirable controls are present or not.
Questionnaires are answered by stating a 'YES' or 'NO' and a 'NO' answer indicates a deficiency in the
internal control system.
YES/NO/Comments or Remarks
Main Control Qs
Is Sales Invoice made at the time of shipment of GOODS ?......................... e.g. of ICQ
a) Is there segregation of duties when making sales invoices?
b) Are invoices sequentially pre-numbered?
c) Are invoices checked for Quantity? ICEQ
d) Are invoices checked for authorized prices? Advantages and disadvantages of ICQs
and ICEQs
Checklists
Checklists may be used instead of questionnaires to evaluate the internal control system. The difference is
that, instead of asking questions, statements are made to ‘mark off’ and tick boxes are used to indicate
where the statement holds true.
For example a checklist may state ‘GOODS are examined on arrival as to quantity and quality’ which
would be ticked (√) if this control does actually occur, or crossed if not. (Simply checking that whether
statement holds true or not!)
(Checklists share many of the same advantages and disadvantages of IQCs and ICEQs.)
Explain the steps the external auditor should take to confirm the accuracy of flowcharts / documentation
in the working paper file.
Steps to confirm Prior year system notes & Flowcharts and other
documentation of Internal control system
1. Obtain system notes/documentation form last year working paper file and ensure they are complete.
2. Review prior year M.L to identify the recommendation that were made last year as this may result in
changes on the system notes / control documentation for the current year.
3. Obtain system documentation/system flowchart from the management to identify any changes made
in last 12 months.
4. Interview the client staff/ management to determine that either any controls / S.O.P’s have change
during the last year.
5. Perform walk-through tests by tracing a single transaction throughout that system to ensure and verify
that system notes/ documentation is accurate.
6. During the walk-through test, confirms that notes/ documentation reflects the current S.O.P in place.
Required:
a. Explain the auditor's responsibilities in relation to an entity's system of internal controls. (3 marks)
b. Other than internal control questionnaires and internal control evaluation questionnaires state
two methods which an auditor may use to document an entity's internal controls. (1 marks)
c. Explain what is meant by 'internal control questionnaires' and 'internal control evaluation
questionnaires’. For each type of questionnaire, give one example of a question that might be
included in respect of the purchases cycle (6 marks)
Answer 61:
a) The auditor should obtain an understanding of internal controls relevant to the audit. They should:
IQCs are used to ask whether controls exist which meet specific control objectives. They comprise a list
of questions designed to determine whether desirable controls are present, and are formulated so that
there is one to cover each of the major transaction cycles.
An ICQ is therefore designed to help evaluate the system as well as to record it. One of the most effective
ways of designing the questionnaire is to phrase the questions so that all the answers can be given as
'YES' or 'NO' and a 'NO’ answer indicates a deficiency in the system.
For example, one question in respect of the purchases cycle might be 'Are purchase invoices matched and
compared to goods received notes before being passed for payment?'
ICEQs have a different focus from ICQs and are concerned with assessing whether specific errors (or
frauds) are possible, rather than establishing whether certain desirable controls are present. This is
achieved by reducing the control criteria for each transaction stream down to a handful of key questions
(or control questions).
Required:
Describe the key characteristics of such organisations with respect to internal controls and the risk which the
auditor may face in such audits.
Answer 5:
Many of the control activities that are typically found in a large company such as segregation of duties, internal
audit etc. may be inappropriate for a small entity because they are too costly or impractical for such smaller
organizations. Often, control systems in small entities are based on a high level of involvement by the directors
or owners. Following audit risks may arise when control systems rely excessively on the involvement of senior
management:
Required:
(c) In the context of control activities explain what is included in ‘Performance reviews’. (3 marks)
Answer 1 c:
Performance reviews – In the context of control activities, performance review includes:
analyses of actual performance against budget and forecasts;
analyses of actual performance against prior period performance
control reporting and variance analysis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Page 134 of 272 Prepared by M. Sajid Kapadia (ACA, FCCA, APFA)
KnS School of Business Studies
ACCA F8 - Audit & Assurance
Summary Notes by SK
ICAP CAF 8 Sept 2014 (4 marks)
Question 6 a
You are the training manager in a firm of chartered accountants. Prepare brief presentation for newly
inducted trainees, on the following:
Answer 6 a:
Control Environment and its elements
The 'control environment' is often referred to as the general 'attitude' to internal control of management and
employees in the organization.
To determine whether the internal auditor’s work is adequate for his purposes, the external auditor is
required to evaluate the internal audit function and its procedures. A decision can then be taken as to
whether the work of the internal auditors can be used as part of the evidence or not.
The table below summarizes the criteria against which the internal audit function will be assessed.
(GENERAL CRITERIA)
If any of the above factors are lacking than external auditor shall not use the work of the internal audit
function.
Criteria Comment
Objectivity What is the status of the internal audit
function within the entity?
To whom does it report? Does it have
access to those charged with governance?
Is it free of any conflicting responsibilities
(e.g. any operational responsibilities)?
Are there any restrictions placed on the
Technical Competence internal audit function / or their scope?
Examples of work of the internal audit function that can be used by the external auditor include:
In addition to the general assessment of the internal audit function, ISA 610 also requires the external
auditor to evaluate each specific piece of work performed by internal audit dept. before it is used as
external audit evidence for the external auditor.
1. the work was properly planned, performed, supervised, reviewed and documented;
2. sufficient, appropriate evidence was obtained to enable auditors to draw reasonable
conclusions;
3. appropriate conclusions were reached, consistent with any reports prepared;
4. any exceptions or unusual matters were properly resolved.
5. making inquiries of appropriate individuals within the internal audit function;
6. observing procedures performed by internal audit;
7. reviewing the internal audit function’s work program and working papers;
8. reperforming a sample of the internal audit function’s procedures
ISA 610 requires the external auditor to communicate the planned use of the work of the internal audit
function to those charged with governance for their understanding of the proposed audit approach.
Direct assistance is defined as the use of internal auditors to perform audit procedures under the direction, supervision
and review of the external auditor.
When determining the nature and extent of direct assistance work to be assigned to internal audit, the
external auditor shall consider:
the amount of judgment involved;
the assessed risk of material misstatement;
the existence of threats to the objectivity and level of competence of the internal auditors;
ISA 610 precludes the use of internal audit to perform direct assistance in procedures that:
involve making significant judgments in the audit;
relate to higher assessed risks of material misstatement where the judgment required in
performing the relevant audit procedures is more;
relate to work with which the internal auditors have been involved and which has already been,
or will be, reported to management or
relate to decisions the external auditor makes regarding the internal audit function and the use
of its work or direct assistance.
The external auditor shall direct, supervise and review the work performed by internal auditors on the
engagement. In doing so:
The direction, supervision and review by the external auditor of the work performed by the internal
auditors must be sufficient in order for the external auditor to be satisfied that the internal auditors have
obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the conclusions based on that work.
Plz NOTE:
The ultimate responsibility of the external audit is of the external auditor who will be signing the audit
report after the completion of the audit.
1. The existence and significance of threats to the objectivity of the internal auditors, and the level
of competence of internal auditors.
2. The basis for the decision regarding the nature and extent of the work performed by the internal
auditors;
3. Who reviewed the work performed and the date and extent of that review in accordance with
ISA 230;
4. The written agreements obtained from an authorized representative of the entity (may be CEO,
CFO or Head of Internal audit dept ) and the internal auditors; and
5. The working papers prepared by the internal auditors who provided direct assistance
Answer:
i. Are the internal auditors members of relevant professional bodies?
ii. Do they have adequate technical training and proficiency?
iii. Are there established policies for hiring and training internal auditors?
iv. Do the internal auditors possess the required knowledge of financial reporting?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Answer:
If the external auditor uses internal auditors to provide direct assistance on the audit, the external
auditor shall include the following in the audit documentation:
The evaluation of the existence and significance of threats to the objectivity of the internal auditors,
and the level of competence of the internal auditors used to provide direct assistance; The basis for
the decision regarding the nature and extent of the work performed by the internal auditors;
Who reviewed the work performed and the date and extent of that review in accordance with ISA
230;
The written agreements obtained from an authorized representative of the entity and the internal
auditors; and
The working papers prepared by the internal auditors who provided direct assistance on the audit
engagement.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAP CAF 8 March 2016 (4 marks)
Question 6c
Briefly explain how an external auditor would evaluate the adequacy of the work performed by the
internal audit function.
Answer:
In order to evaluate the adequacy of internal audit function, the external auditor should assess
whether:
i. The work was properly planned, performed, supervised, reviewed and documented;
ii. Sufficient, appropriate evidence was obtained to enable internal auditors to draw reasonable
conclusions;
iii. Appropriate conclusions were reached, consistent with any reports prepared;
iv. Any exceptions or unusual matters were properly resolved.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Student Notings
Student Notings
Examples / areas / situations where experts are used by the auditor (IMP)
1. Valuation of land & buildings, plant & machinery or any specialized stock)
2. Valuation of intangible assets.
3. Estimations of oil & gas reserves.
4. Valuation of environmental liabilities.
5. Interpretation of contracts and various laws.
6. Analysis of complex tax issues.
Factors to consider whether or not to use an expert (whether to use the work of an
expert or not)
1. Whether management has used a management’s expert in preparing the financial statements. The
nature and significance of the matter, including its complexity.
2. The risks of material misstatement in the matter.
3. The expected nature of procedures to respond to identified risks, including the auditor’s knowledge
of and experience with the work of experts in relation to such matters;
4. The availability of alternative sources of audit evidence.
OBJECTIVITY OF AN EXPERT
The expert must not be in any type of employment with the audit client.
The external auditor must not be dependent or related in any form on the audit client
e.g. (He has obtained a loan from the client or is a family relative of the audit client.)
2. Obtain an understanding of the expert’s field of expertise to allow the auditor to determine the
scope of his work.
3. Obtain an understanding of the expert’s field of expertise to allow the auditor to evaluate the
adequacy of his work.
Note: Generally, the auditor is assessing whether the expert’s work constitutes sufficient and
appropriate audit evidence for the audit.
1. The auditor shall agree with the expert on the extent of further audit procedures to be performed.
2. The auditor shall perform additional audit procedures.
3. Hire another expert
If such reference is required by law, the auditor shall indicate in the auditor’s report that the reference
does not reduce the auditor’s responsibility for the auditor’s opinion.
If the auditor makes reference to the work of an auditor’s expert in the auditor’s report because such
reference is relevant to an understanding of a modification and in this case experts name will be
mentioned in the modification para with the approval of the expert. (If consent not given, obtain
legal advice)
1 Examples / situations where an auditors expert may be used by the E.A Learn
2 Terms / contents of an agreement with an expert Learn
3 Factors to assess the competence, capability and objectivity of an expert Learn
4 Evaluating the adequacy of an Experts work Learn
5 Reference to the work of an Expert in the auditors report Read
How would an auditor assess the competency and capabilities of an auditor’s expert?
Answer:
We will assess the competence, capabilities and objectivity of the expert in one or more of the following
ways:
(i) Personal experience with previous work of that expert.
(ii) Discussions with that expert.
(iii) Discussions with other auditors or others who are familiar with that expert’s work.
(iv) Knowledge of that expert’s qualifications, membership of a professional body or industry
association, license to practice, or other forms of external recognition.
(v) Published papers or books written by that expert.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An audit junior of your firm has inquired about the following matters relating to an audit:
(i) Is there any need to evaluate the adequacy of expert’s work, if the procedures related to competency
and independence of the auditor’s expert have been performed?
(ii) Can an audit firm include a reference to the expert’s work in the audit report so that the audit firm’s
responsibility may be reduced in the areas in which the audit firm does not have expertise?
Required:
Comment on the above queries raised by audit junior in the light of International Standards on
Auditing.
Answer:
Auditor remains fully responsible for the report produced, even if evidence on which it is based was
produced by others. The auditor has sole responsibility for the audit opinion issued and this is not
reduced in any way by his use of an expert.
Therefore, he should not refer in his report to the use of an expert, unless that is required by law or
regulation. Even then, or if the auditor refers to the expert’s work in his report because it is relevant to an
understanding of a modified opinion, then he must make it clear that such a reference does not reduce
his responsibility for that opinion in any way.
The auditor therefore cannot simply accept work performed by experts. That work must be evaluated in
the same way as any other audit evidence is evaluated.
Answer 7 c:
Following are the situations which may require the engagement of an auditor’s expert:
• legal opinions
• specialist valuation areas, such as property or pension liabilities
• analysis of complex or unusual taxation issues
• specialized inventory counts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAP CAF 8 March 2016 (6 marks)
Question 9
You are the audit manager in a firm of Chartered Accountants. Your firm is often required to
engage an auditor’s expert for reporting on matters relating to the audits.
a. List four key terms of engagement which should be agreed with the expert. (2 marks)
b. Specify the factors which should be considered in evaluating the adequacy of the work
performed by the expert. (4 marks)
Answer 9:
a.
(i) the nature, scope and objectives of the expert’s work
(ii) the respective responsibilities of the expert and the auditor
(iii) the form of the expert’s report
(iv) confidentiality requirements
b. The factors that should be considered in evaluating the adequacy of the expert’s work, include:
reasonableness of the expert’s conclusions
consistency of those conclusions with other audit evidence
reasonableness of significant assumptions and methods used
relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ICAP CAF 8 March 2015 (9 marks)
Question 4
Mineral Limited (ML) has incorporated a liability for gratuity payable to its employees on the basis of
actuarial valuation carried out by Professionals Limited (PL). As the audit partner of ML you are not
satisfied with the valuation report prepared by PL, and have decided to appoint Experts Limited (EL)
to carry out the valuation exercise again.
Required:
a. State the matters that you would consider regarding:
i. The competence, capabilities and objectivity of EL. (3 marks)
ii. Evaluation of the adequacy of EL’s work. (3 marks)
b. Briefly discuss the course of action in case you are not satisfied with the work performed by EL.
(3 marks)
ii. While evaluating the adequacy of the EL's work, the following would be considered:
Reasonableness of the EL's conclusions.
Consistency of such conclusions with other audit evidence.
Reasonableness of significant assumptions and methods used.
Relevance, completeness and accuracy of source data.
b. If the auditor decides that the work of the expert is not adequate, he is required to:
agree additional work with the expert, or
perform other appropriate additional audit procedures.
hire another expert
‘Audit Report’
(ISA 700/701/705/706)
1. List & briefly explain the contents of an external audit report as per ISA
700 (Revised).
2. List the contents of an audit report and also explain the reasons for such
para in the audit report/ appropriateness of such statements in the audit
report.
3. Explain the term modified opinion as per ISA 705 /
Briefly explain the types of modifications.
4. Explain the term unmodified opinion and also draft an opinion paragraph
for such an opinion.
5. Briefly list the contents of an auditor’s responsibility para as per ISA 700.
6. Define / briefly explain the term pervasive & explain with examples.
7. Briefly explain the conditions of an E.O.M para & also list the example of
situations under which an E.O.M para can be given by the Auditor.
8. List the contents of an E.O.M para / Features of an E.O.M para.
9. Briefly explain the conditions of an O.M para & also list the example of
situations under which an O.M para can be given by the Auditor.
10. Scenario based question (V. Imp)
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________
Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of ABC Company (the Company), which comprise the
statement of financial position as at December 31, 20X1, and the statement of comprehensive income,
statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the
financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
Key Audit Matters (ISA 701) ------Significant Matters for the current period
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our
audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters
were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our
opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
[Description of each key audit matter in accordance with ISA 701, which applies to audits of the
financial statements of listed entities.]
Those charged with governance are responsible for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting
process.
Auditor’s Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements (Most
Important para)
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole
are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report
that includes our opinion. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance, but is
not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the
basis of these financial statements. (Concept of Materiality- ISA 320)
As part of an audit in accordance with ISAs, we exercise professional judgment and maintain
professional skepticism throughout the audit. We also:
1. Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit
evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not
detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
2. Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but NOT for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control.
3. Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by management.
Auditors Signature
(The report can be signed in the name of the audit firm OR in the personal name of the sole partner, as
the case may be.)
Auditors Address
Date of Audit Report (D.O.R)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explanation
Title of the Report The auditor’s report must have a title that clearly indicates that it is
the report of the independent auditor and distinguishes this from
other reports.
The address will be determined by the law / statue, but is likely to
Addressee be the shareholders or those charged with governance.
Opinion paragraph The opinion paragraph must identify the entity being audited, state
that the financial statements have been audited and also
mentioning that B/S, P&L, SOCE, Cashflows and notes to the
accounts comprise the F/S and also specifies the period covered by
the financial statements.
Key audit matters For the audit of listed entities, or where required by law or
(ISA 701) regulation, the auditor should include Key audit matters section.
Other information For the audit of listed entities or any other entity where the
(ISA 720) auditor has obtained other information, an ‘Other information’
section should be included in the auditor’s report. This section
should include
A statement that management is responsible for the other
information
A statement that the auditor’s opinion does not cover the
other information
A description of auditor’s responsibilities for reading
considering and reporting on other information, and
Responsibilities for the Financial This section describes management’s responsibilities including the
statements following:
(Mgmt. and TCWG)
The preparation of financial statement in accordance with
the applicable financial reporting framework;
The implementation of such internal controls.
The assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going
concern, the appropriateness of the going concern basis of
accounting and adequacy of its disclosures in the F/S.
Auditor's responsibilities for the This section describes External Auditors responsibilities including
audit of financial statements the following:
The auditor’s objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance
that whether the financial statements as a whole are free
from material misstatements
To issue an auditor’s report that includes the auditor’s
opinion; and
Explain that misstatements can arise from fraud or
error
Describe the meaning of materiality
That the auditor exercises professional judgment and
maintains professional skepticism throughout the audit
Other responsibilities of an external auditor.
Other reporting responsibilities If the auditor is required by local law to report on any other matter,
this must be done in this additional paragraph.
Name of the engagement partner The name of engagement partner should be mentioned in the Audit
report.
The report must contain the auditor’s signature, which can be the
Auditor’s signature auditor’s own name or the audit firm’s name as the case may be.
Auditors Address The location / city where the auditor practices must be mentioned.
Date of the report (D.O.R) This is the date where sufficient appropriate audit evidence has
been obtained by the external auditor on which to base the audit
opinion.
The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence to conclude that
the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement.
Modified
Modified Opinions:
Qualified Opinion, Adverse
Opinion and a Disclaimer of
Opinion
Illustration 5: E.O.M + OM
Illustration 6: E.O.M + M.O.O
A term used to describe the effects or possible effects on the financial statements of misstatements or
undetected misstatements (due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence). There are
three types of pervasive effect:
a) Those that are not confined to specific elements, accounts or items in the financial statements
b) Those that are confined to specific elements, accounts or items in the financial statements and
represent or could represent a substantial portion of the financial statements
c) Those that relate to disclosures which are fundamental to users' understanding of the financial
statements
1. Are not confined to specific elements, accounts or items of the financial statements;
_______________________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________
2. If so confined, represent or could represent a substantial proportion of the financial statements; or
(One misstatement is 30% of profit before tax or say that Inventory could not be verified amounting to
45 % of total assets.)
(A disclosure if not given or not adequate …could seriously mislead the shareholders and stake holders
eg No disclosure in the case of going concern as per ISA 570) ……….will be covered later in ISA 570
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pervasiveness is a matter that confuses many candidates as; once again, it is a matter that requires
professional judgment. In this case the judgment is whether the matter is isolated to specific components
of the financial statements, or whether the matter pervades many elements of the financial statements,
rendering them unreliable as a whole.
The bottom line is that ….IF the auditor believes that the financial statements may be relied upon in
some part for decision making then the matter is material and not pervasive. If, however, they believe
the financial statements should NOT be relied upon at all for making decisions then the matter is
PERVASIVE.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Practical aspects of this concept have been covered under the heading of Audit report kay
cheetay points) very Imp !
When there is ……
Qualified Opinion
A qualified opinion must be expressed in the auditor's report in the following two situations:
The auditor concludes that misstatements are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements
The auditor cannot obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion but
concludes that the possible effects of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not
pervasive.
The auditor's inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence is also referred to as a limitation on
the scope of the audit and could arise from:
Circumstances beyond the entity's control (e.g. accounting records destroyed)
Circumstances relating to the nature or timing of the auditor's work (e.g. the timing of the auditor's
appointment prevents the observation of the physical inventory count)
Limitations imposed by management (e.g. management prevents the auditor from requesting
external confirmation of specific account balances)
QUALIFIED OPINION
In the case of Material Misstatement (M.M)
Because of TREATMENT
In our opinion, except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion
section of our report, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the
Company as at December 31, 20Xl, and (of) its ………….
Because of Disclosure
If disclosure is NOT given than wordings will be:
“In our opinion except for the non-disclosure of the matter described in the basis for qualified
opinion section of our report the accounts are giving a true and fair view….”.
If disclosure is not INADEQUATE
“In our opinion except for the incomplete disclosure of the matter described in the basis for
qualified section of our report the accounts are giving a true and fair view…..”.
“In our opinion except for the affects of the matter described in the Basis for …. Financial statements
give a true and fair view”.
OR
“In our opinion except for the affects of the incorrect accounting policy as described in the Basis for ….
Financial statements give a true and fair view”.
(In this case a basis for qualified opinion paragraph will be inserted immediately after the opinion
paragraph mentioning the reason for qualification)
In the case of Inability to obtain S.A.A.E
In our opinion, except for the Possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion
section of our report, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of the
company as at December 31, 20Xl……………….
Adverse Opinion
When there are Material Misstatements individually or in the aggregate and are both Material
&Pervasive to the financial statements taken as a whole.
An adverse opinion is expressed when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit
evidence, concludes that misstatements are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.
Because of TREATMENT
In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for Adverse Opinion
section of our report the financial statements DO NOT GIVE a TRUE and FAIR view of the financial
position of the company as at December 31 20X1, and ………..
Because of DISCLOSURE
“In our opinion, because of the significance of the matter described in the Basis for …. Financial
statements do not give a true and fair view”.
OR
“In our opinion because of the significance of the incorrect accounting policy as described in the Basis for
…. Financial statements do not give a true and fair view”.
Disclaimer of Opinion
Auditor is Unable to obtain S.A.A.E on which to base the audit opinion AND the matter is Material
AND Pervasive
ISA 705 states that the auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient
appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that the possible
effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and
pervasive.
Example might be where the auditor is unable to attend the inventory count and unable to request
receivable confirmations, and there is no other realistic means of gathering evidence on these two areas.
If these two areas form a significant element of the total assets value, a disclaimer may be appropriate.
EXCEPTION
ISA 705 states that the auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare circumstances
involving multiple uncertainties, the auditor concludes that, notwithstanding having obtained
sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding each of the individual uncertainties, it is not possible to
form an opinion on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the uncertainties and
their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
The external auditor to explain in the basis para that inadequacy of disclosure in the F/S
(READ ONLY)
Disclosing the omitted information in the basis for modification paragraph would not be practicable if:
The disclosures have not been prepared by management or not readily available to the auditor; or
The disclosures would be unduly voluminous in relation to the auditor’s report.
Class Example:
Nature: Substantive Procedures cannot be performed because of system automation and the results of
TOCs are not effective. (This is covered after TOC and S.P)
IMP
If alternative/further audit procedures can be performed by the External Auditor, this will NOT
constitute an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence.
Emphasis of Matter Paragraph (E.O.M) + Other Matter Para (O.M) (ISA 706 Revised)
Further Conditions:
There is no Material Misstatement &
Inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
1. E.O.M will not be given for a matter that has already been discussed in KAM para.
2. E.O.M will not be given for a matter that has already been discussed in Basis for
Modification para.
3. E.O.M will not be given for a matter that has already been discussed in Other matter
para.
4. E.O.M will not be given for a matter that has already been discussed in Separate Para
Headed “Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern”
ISA 560
covered later
ISA 570
(It refers to a matter other than those presented or disclosed in the financial statements)
Important Points:
In rare circumstances auditor could not withdraw (because of legal requirements) even though the
effect of inability to obtain SAAE (due to management-imposed limitation) was material and
pervasive, auditor may consider to include an OTHER MATTER Para describing the reason for
not withdrawing from the engagement.
Qualified Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of ABC Company (the Company) which comprise the
statement of financial position as at December 31, 20X1 …………………………………………………
In our opinion, Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified
Opinion section of our report, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the financial position of
the Company as at December 31, 20Xl, and (of) its
……………………………………………………………
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of
the Financial Statements section of our report. We are independent of the Company in accordance with
the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial statements in [jurisdiction], and
we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our qualified opinion.
Other Information
Adverse Opinion
We have audited the financial statements of ABC Company (the Company) which comprise the
statement of financial position as at December 31, 20X1 and …………………………………………..
In our opinion, Because of the significance of the matter discussed in the Basis for
Adverse Opinion section of our report the financial statements do not give a true and fair view of the
financial position of the company as at December 31, 20Xl and ………………………………….
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our
responsibilities under those standards….same wordings….
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion, Except for the possible effects of the matter described in the Basis for
Qualified Opinion section of our report, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the
financial position of the company as at December 31, 20X1, and………………
With respect to inventory having a carrying amount of $X the audit evidence available to us was limited
because we did not observe the counting of the physical inventory as at 31 December 20X1, since that
date was prior to our appointment as auditor of the company. Owing to the nature of the company's
records, we were unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the inventories
quantities by using other audit procedures.
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs). Our
responsibilities under those standards …same
Disclaimer of Opinion
We were engaged to audit the financial statements of ABC Company (the Company), which comprise
the statement of financial position as at December 31, 20X1, and the statement of comprehensive
income, statement of changes in equity and statement of cash flows for the year then ended, …….
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to Note X of the financial statements, which
describes the effects of a fire in the company's production facilities. Our
opinion is not modified in respect of this matter.
Key Audit Matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most
significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period. These matters were
addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our
opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
(Description of each key audit matter in accordance with ISA 701)
Other Matter
(Example where both Modification plus E.O.M is given in the Audit Report)
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Shareholders of ABC Company
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion, Except for the effects of the matter described in the Basis for Qualified Opinion
section of our report, the financial statements give a true & fair view of the financial position of the
Company as at December 31, 20X1, and …………………………………………………………………..
As per ISA
1. Report on Financial Statement
(1st Heading)
E.O.M K.A.M
K.A.M E.O.M
(effects of fire lawsuit etc.)
O.M O.M
Other matter
3. In case it pertains to the whole AUDIT report than no sub heading …. rather
there will be a 3rd main heading in the audit report
Other matter
2) Calculation of Materiality
$000
1 Interest payable omitted in error 1,942
2 Additional allowance for receivables required 9,189
3 Error in sales invoice processing resulting in understatement of sales 8,541
4 Write off in respect of faulty goods 2,900
Faulty goods
The adjustment for faulty goods listed as an uncorrected misstatement above relates to an entire batch
of shoes, which was produced on 12 September 20X8. The audit work concluded that the cost of this
inventory exceeded its net realisable value by $2·9m. The directors dispute the audit team’s figures and
believe that the realisable value of the inventory still exceeds its cost.
1. Which of the uncorrected misstatements numbered (1), (2) and (3) by the audit team MUST be
adjusted for if the auditor is to issue an unmodified audit opinion?
2. All adjustments required by the auditors have been made to the financial statements with the
exception of adjustment (4) relating to the faulty goods.
Which of the following correctly describes the effect of this matter on the auditor’s report?
A. Unmodified opinion with no further disclosure
B. Unmodified opinion with disclosure in an emphasis of matter paragraph
C. Qualified opinion due to material misstatement
D. Qualified opinion due to inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence
Written Representations
The auditor shall request a written representation from management and, where appropriate, those
charged with governance whether they believe the effects of uncorrected misstatements are immaterial,
individually and in aggregate, to the financial statements as a whole.
Written Representations
Because the preparation of the financial statements requires management to adjust the financial
statements to correct material misstatements, the auditor is required to request them to provide a
written representation about uncorrected misstatements.
In some circumstances, management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance may not
believe that certain uncorrected misstatements are misstatements.
For that reason, they may want to add to their written representation words such as: "We do not agree
that items ... and ... constitute misstatements because [description of reasons]."
Obtaining this representation does not, however, relieve the auditor of the need to form a conclusion
on the effect of uncorrected misstatements.
When the question of Audit Report mentions Planning Materiality (Variable for determining the
materiality) than the following wordings to be added in the solution / answer:
The question is ….. how can we make the unmodified auditor's report/ opinion clear and so
transparent and understandable to the users / shareholders ….that this expectation GAP reduces to a
reasonable extent .( it can never be reduced)
(The objective of an external audit is to expresses an opinion on the financial statements of the
company and not the prevention and detection of fraud, as it is the responsibility of management &
TCWG. Adding further, an unmodified opinion is not a guarantee that no frauds exist in financial
statements
The auditors provide an absolute level of assurance that the figures in the financial statements are
correct (ignoring the concept of materiality and the limitations of estimates and various assumptions).
Clarification:
External auditor provides reasonable level of assurance which is a high but not an absolute level of
assurance because there are inherent limitations of an audit. For example: 100 % testing is not done as
the external auditor use sampling technique to conduct the audit plus in few cases audit evidence is
persuasive rather than conclusive.
During the audit, the team learnt that Research Ltd capitalised $2.5 million of development costs in the
year, relating to a new portable scanning machine for ambulances. However, the audit team also found
evidence that Research Ltd have been unable to sell any of the portable scanning machines since they
are too large to fit in a standard ambulance. Further audit procedures discovered there was no market
for the machines elsewhere.
The directors of Research Ltd have refused to remove the development costs from their statement of
financial position as they believe that ambulances will probably get bigger in the next few years and they
will be able to sell the machines then.
Required
1. Explain why the inclusion of the development costs on Research Ltd's statement of financial
position for the year ending 31 December 20X6 is an issue for the auditors.
3. Assume management refuses to correct the financial statements for the matter in part (1). What
modification to the auditor's opinion would Check & Co need to make and why?
4. Explain how the modification will impact the structure and form of the auditor's report.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solution of Activity 1:
2. The development costs are 3.2% of net assets, 2.6% of revenue and 12.5% of profit before tax.
Therefore, they are material to both the statement of financial position and the statement of profit
and loss.
3. If management refuse to remove the development costs from the statement of financial position then
there is a material misstatement and the opinion will need to be modified. Since this misstatement
4. The title of the opinion paragraph will be amended to 'Qualified Opinion'. The title of the 'Basis for
Opinion' paragraph which immediately follows the opinion paragraph will need to be amended to
'Basis for Qualified Opinion'. This paragraph states the reason for the qualification and quantifies its
effect on the financial statements. Its positioning will not change due to the qualification.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Activity 2:
Modified opinions and modified auditor's reports
You are the audit manager of Check & Co and are reviewing the key issues identified in the files of
several audit clients, each of which has a year end of 30 September 20X6.
1) The first audit client is Little Bees Co (LB). The fieldwork stage for this audit has been completed
and the draft financial statements show a profit before tax of $175,000.
LB has valued a certain inventory line at its total cost price of $17,000. These inventory items have
not been sold for a number of years and it is unlikely that they can be sold in the future unless the
price is reduced to $3,000. The finance director is confident that the issue will be resolved and no
write down was made with regards to this balance.
Required:
Which of the following options correctly summarizes the impact on the auditor's report if the issue
remains unresolved?
a) Adverse opinion
b) Disclaimer of opinion
c) Qualified 'except for'
d) Unmodified opinion
Required
Which of the following options correctly summarises the impact on the auditor's report of the above
issue?
a) Disclaimer of opinion
b) Qualified 'except for’
c) Unmodified opinion
d) Unmodified opinion with emphasis of matter paragraph
4) Mr. Shift has sent such a huge amount of paperwork to Maker detailing the extent of his claim along
with supporting medical documentation and character references that the audit team has had to
devote a significant amount of audit attention to this area of the audit. The directors have not made
any reference to the claim in the financial statements and you agree with Maker's lawyers' indication
that it is highly unlikely that Mr. Shift will be successful in his claim.
Required
Based on the above information indicate whether the audit opinion should be modified or
unmodified and the appropriate disclosure which should be made in the auditor's report:
Audit opinion Disclosure in the auditor's report
Audit opinion: Modified
Unmodified
Disclosure in the auditor's report: Emphasis of matter paragraph
Key audit matter paragraph
Material uncertainty related to going concern paragraph
No disclosure required
Other matter paragraph
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Unmodified audit opinion with a key audit matter paragraph. The directors have not made any
reference to the claim in the financial statements. This seems appropriate as you agree with the
lawyer’s indication that the claim will not be successful Therefore, an unmodified audit opinion
would be issued.
However, Maker is a listed entity and the claim has taken up a significant amount of audit time and
so this would be included within the key audit matters section.
Activity 3:
Homes’r’Us is a large listed construction company based in the north of the country, whose activities
encompass house building and development. Its annual revenue is $550m and profit before tax is $70m.
You are the audit senior involved with the audit of Homes’r’Us for the year ended 31 December 20X7.
The following matters have come to your attention during the review stage of the audit in April 20X8;
Solution of Activity 3:
a) Customer going into liquidation
Audit Procedures
Assess the likelihood of recovery of this amount by discussion with the directors of Homes'r Us.
Confirm the amount of the amount outstanding as at the yearend by inspection of the receivables
ledger and correspondence with the customer.
Review any correspondence between the company and the customer to assess likelihood of recovery
of any amounts.
Obtain a written representation point regarding the amount outstanding from the customer from the
directors of Homes’r ‘Us.
Revenue, profit and net assets will all be overstated by $7.5m if the accounts are not adjusted. The
amount represents 10.7% of profit before tax and 1.4% of revenue so is clearly material.
Page 200 of 272 Prepared by M. Sajid Kapadia (ACA, FCCA, APFA)
KnS School of Business Studies
ACCA F8 - Audit & Assurance
Summary Handouts by SK
An adjustment is required in the financial statements to reduce the receivables balance and profits.
Effect on auditor's report.
The effect of the matter on the financial statements is clearly material. If the adjustments required are
made, then there would be no effect on the auditor's report.
If the directors refused to make the adjustment required, the audit opinion would be modified on the
basis that the accounts are not free from material misstatement and a qualified 'except for' opinion would
be issued, as the mat material but not pervasive.
ACCA
1. Briefly explain the concept of KAM and list examples of matters that can be included or placed
in KAM para as per ISA 701.
2. Determine the matters to be considered to place a matter as KAM in the audit report.
3. Explain the factors to be considered in determining whether a matter will be placed in KAM
para.
4. Importance / purpose of KAM in the audit report
5. Scenario based question along with the audit report (very imp! )
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Auditor shall communicate key audit matters in the auditor's report for audits of
Listed entities
Other than listed entities, if required by law
Other entities as per auditors professional judgment, including those that may be of significant
public interest.
The purpose of including KAM in the audit report is to help users in understanding the entity and to
provide a basis for users to discuss with management and TCWG about matters related to the entity and
the financial statement i.e. KAM has increased more transparency for the users of the F/S.
1. High ROMM
2. Significantly subjective or Judgmental issues / amounts
3. Uncertainty of matter
4. Complex issue
5. Areas where an expert is required or any consultation is required
6. Assessed Significant Risks that required significant audit attention/
7. Significant transactions and events affecting the audit
8. Change in audit approach during the audit as a result of an unexpected audit evidence
9. The severity of control deficiency identified.
10. Whether several separate issues interacted, eg if a long-term contract had repercussions
in several areas (revenue recognition, litigation or contingencies)
11. Any misstatements related to the matter, and the nature and materiality of the
misstatements
12. The importance of the matter to intended users' understanding, including materiality
The description of each key audit matter in the Key Audit Matters section of the auditor's report shall
1) Include a reference to the related disclosure(s), if any, in the financial statements;
2) State that why the matter was considered to be one of most significance in the audit; and
3) Specify how the matter was addressed in the audit
I. A brief overview of procedures performed;
II. An indication of the outcome of the auditor's procedures; or
III. Key observations with respect to the matter,
Communication with those charged with governance enables them to be made aware of the key audit
matters that the auditor intends to communicate in the auditor's report, and provides them with an
opportunity to obtain further clarification where necessary.
The auditor shall communicate with them:
Those matters the auditor has determined to be the key audit matters; or
The auditor's determination that there are no key audit matters to communicate in the auditor's
report.
[Description of each key audit matter in accordance with ISA 701, which applies to audit of the financial
statements of listed entities….]
(Description of each key audit matter in accordance with ISA 701, which …….)
Except for the matter described in the Basis For Adverse Opinion section we have determined that there
are no other key audit matters to communicate in our report.
We have determined that there are NO Key audit matters to communicate in our report.
As the matter is most significant for the current period and discussed with B.O.D / A.C during
the Audit and at the same time special audit procedures were performed by the External Auditor
and to resolve the matter / an expert / independent consultant was also hired to perform
procedures to resolve the matter / case.
Therefore as there is no M.M in the F/S or inability to obtain S.A.A.E the matter will be placed
as KAM para in the audit report
Based on the above explanation as the matter is most significant matter for the current period
therefore the matter will be placed as KAM Paragraph in the auditor report. This para to give an
overview of audit procedures performed, outcome of those procedures, reference to related
disclosure in the F/S and key observations of the auditor with respect to the matter.
KAM para to be placed after Basis for Opinion para and will be placed either before EOM or
after EOM para (if any) as per ISA 706.
The KAMS are the key matters for the audit of the whole financial statements. They are not separate
auditor's opinions for each little part of the financial statements, but merely further information on the
process that led up to the opinion on the financial statements as a whole.
Likewise, the auditor's opinion refers to the financial statements as a whole: as a whole they might give
a true and fair view, or as a whole they might be true and fair but 'except for one area (and so on).
If the auditor is going to express a modified opinion, then logically the matter giving rise to the
modification is a key audit matter. However, the description of the matter will be given in the 'basis for
modified opinion' paragraph, so it is not included as a KAM in the report. The auditor should include a
reference to the basis for modified opinion paragraph instead.
ISA 701 also makes special mention of going concern problems. Where there is a material uncertainty
in relation to going concern, the matter should not be described as a KAM, but should be discussed in
the 'Material uncertainty in relation to going concern' paragraph' instead.
As per ISA
2. Report on Financial Statement
(1st Heading)
E.O.M K.A.M
K.A.M E.O.M
(effects of fire lawsuit etc.)
O.M O.M
Other matter
3. In case it pertains to the whole AUDIT report than no sub heading …. rather
there will be a 3rd main heading in the audit report
Other matter
Revenue Recognition
The amount of revenue and profit recognized in the year on the sale of [name of product] and
aftermarket contract for services is linked to or separate from the contract for sale of [name of product].
As the commercial arrangements can be complex, significant judgment is applied in selecting the
accounting basis in each case. In our view, revenue recognition is significant to our audit as the Group
might inappropriately account for sales of [name of product] and long-term service agreements as a
single arrangement for accounting purposes and this would usually lead to revenue and profit being
recognized too early because the margin in the long-term service agreement is usually higher than the
margin in the [name of product] sale agreement.
Our audit procedures to address the risk of material misstatement relating to revenue recognition,
which was considered to be a significant risk, included:
Testing of controls, assisted by our own IT specialists, including, among others, those over:
input of individual advertising campaigns' terms and pricing; comparison of those terms and
pricing data against the related overarching contracts with advertising agencies; and linkage to
viewer data; and
Detailed analysis of revenue and the timing of its recognition based on expectations derived
from our industry knowledge and external market data, following up variances from our
expectations.
Answer:
Reporting implication:
The matter of application of IFRS 16 is significant as Smart Footwear operates through number of
rentals outlets. Furthermore, the change in accounting policy and related adjustments have taken
considerable time of audit team to verify. The matter was also discussed and brought to the knowledge
of those charged with governance in the meeting of the audit committee and through board letter.
Considering all these factors, the auditor will add the matter of application of IFRS 16 as key audit
matter in the audit report.
Answer:
Change in accounting policy has to be reported as a key audit matter. For this purpose it is necessary
that it should be discussed with those charged with governance. In the key audit matter section, the
auditor shall:
include a reference to the related disclosure(s), if any, in the financial statements
state why the matter was considered to be one of most significance in the audit; and
specify how the matter was addressed in the audit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In relation to the audit report on financial statements and the contents thereof (under revised/new
ISAs), discuss the appropriateness or otherwise of the following statement:
‘Key audit matters are determined from the matters communicated with the management of the entity
that required significant auditor’s attention in performing the audit. In making that determination, the
auditor shall take into account the effects on the audit of significant events or transactions that occurred
during the current year and prior period presented.’
Answer:
The statement is not appropriate as the Key Audit Matters are selected from the matters communicated
with those charged with governance and in making those assessments matters pertaining current period
only are considered as opposed to matters pertaining to prior period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q2. Explain the term subsequent events as per ISA 560 and
briefly discuss the events that it deals with?
To respond appropriately to facts that become known to the auditor after the date of the auditors’
report which may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report if they were known to the
auditor at the date of the report
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsequent Events are events occurring between the period-end (B/S Date) and the date of the
auditor’s report and also include facts discovered after the auditor’s report has been issued.
Auditors shall consider the effect of such events on the financial statements and on their audit
opinion.
IAS 10 – Recap..
ISA 10 Events after the reporting period deals with the treatment in the financial statements of events,
both favourable and unfavourable, occurring after the period-end. There are two types of event
defined by IAS 10:
Those that provide evidence of conditions that existed at the year-end date (adjusting
events)
Those that are indicative of conditions that arose after the year-end date (non-adjusting
events)
Inquiries of management
Status of items involving subjective judgment (like provisions involving estimates)
Status of items accounted for using inconclusive data at the B/S date (based on info at the B/S
date)
Whether there have been any:
Sales or destruction of assets
Developments involving risk areas, provisions and contingencies
Unusual accounting adjustments
Major events (eg going concern problems)
Litigations or claims
Other Procedures
Review management procedures for identifying subsequent events to ensure that such events are
identified
on a timely basis.
Read minutes of B.O.D /other committee meetings and enquire about unusual items.
Review latest available interim financial statements. (First quarterly F/S)
Obtain evidence concerning any litigation/ lawsuit from the company's lawyers.
Obtain written representation that all events occurring subsequent to the period-end which need
adjustment or disclosure have been adjusted or disclosed. (TO BE COVERED IN ISA 580)
Facts discovered AFTER the date of the auditor’s but BEFORE the financial statements
are issued
The financial statements are the management’s responsibility. They should therefore inform the
auditors of any material subsequent events between the date of the auditor’ report and the date of the
financial statements are issued. The auditor does not have any obligation to perform procedures, or
make enquiries regarding the financial statements, after the date of the report.
However, if the auditor becomes aware of a fact that, had it been known to the auditor at the date of
the auditor’s report, may have caused the auditor to amend the auditor’s report, the auditor shall:
Discuss the matter with management and those charged with governance.
Determine whether the financial statements need amendment.
If amendment is required, inquire how management intends to address the matter in the financial
statements.
If amendment is required to the financial statements and management makes the necessary changes,
the auditor must carry out a number of procedures:
1. Debtors/Receivables
1a)
Student Notings
Assumption: _______________
(____________________________________)
5a) Sale of stock after the B/S Date that is damaged or obsolete
(________________________________________________________________)
Under the going concern assumption, an entity is viewed as continuing in business for the foreseeable
future. General purpose F/S are prepared on a going concern basis, unless management either intends to
liquidate the entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so and when Going concern
assumption is valid than assets and liabilities are recorded on the basis that the entity will be able to realize
its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.
Responsibilities of Management
Because general purpose F/S are prepared on a going concern basis, the going concern assumption is a
fundamental principle in the preparation of F/S. Therefore managements responsibility for the
presentation and preparation of the F/S also includes responsibility to assess the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern even if there is no explicit requirement to do so in the framework.
If mgmt. becomes aware of facts that cast doubt upon the entity’s ability to continue as going concern
than Mgmt. must disclose those uncertainties in the F/S.
If mgmt. concludes that G.C assumption is not appropriate than F/S will be prepared on breakup
value basis but this fact must be disclosed in the F/S for the shareholder / users
The auditor to inquire and perform procedures to identify events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on Going concern assumption for a period of twelve months from the balance sheet
date or a longer period if the applicable F.R.F / law or regulation specifies / or conditions require.
The auditor must remain alert throughout the period for conditions that may cast doubt on the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The auditor’s responsibility is to obtain sufficient appropriate
audit evidence about the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern assumption in the
preparation and presentation of the financial statements for the year and to conclude that whether
there is a material uncertainty about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The potential effects of inherent limitations on the auditor’s ability to detect material misstatements
are greater for future events or conditions that may cause an entity to cease to continue as a going
concern. The auditor cannot predict such future events or conditions.
Accordingly, the absence of any reference to going concern uncertainty in an auditor’s report
cannot be viewed as a guarantee as to the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
(In short, Auditor must be alert throughout the audit for doubts on GC ..! + evaluate management’s
assessment of the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern Note: this assessment will be for a
minimum period of 12 months)
The significance of such events or conditions often can be mitigated by other factors. For example, the
effect of an entity being unable to make its normal debt repayments may be counter-balanced by
management’s plans to maintain adequate cash flows by alternative means, such as by disposing of
assets, or obtaining additional capital.
Audit Procedures When Events or Conditions Are Identified
Specific Audit procedures to be performed as follows: (Please learn these…..!!) (IMP)
1. Obtain company’s cashflow forecast and review the cash inflows and cash outflows and also the
reasonableness of their assumptions and also discuss unfavorable findings with management.
2. Review post year end management accounts to assess if they are in line with cashflow and other
forecasts.
3. Reading the terms of loan agreements and determining whether any have been breached.
4. Discuss with director finance regarding increase in sales or whether new customers have been
obtained. (new sales lead )
5. Review the company’s post year end sales order book to assess and determine if the levels of
trade/sales are likely to increase.
6. Review post year end (subsequent) B.O.D minutes and minutes of other relevant committees to
identify other issues which might indicate other risks of going concern.
7. Inquiring of the entity’s legal counsel regarding the existence of litigation and claims.
(eg Claims from Suppliers and Customers)
8. Enquire from company lawyers with respect to proposed change in any law / legislation which
might make company product obsolete in the near future.
9. Confirming the existence of arrangements to provide financial support from related and third
parties and assessing their financial ability.
10. Evaluating plans to deal with un-fulfilled customer orders. (Orders that are pending yet )
11. Performing audit procedures regarding subsequent events to identify those that affect the entity’s
ability to continue as a going concern.
12. Confirming the existence, terms and conditions of borrowing facilities from Banks. (eg Loan
Agreements or correspondence)
13. Obtaining and reviewing reports of any regulatory actions. (for any penalties being imposed by
regulatory bodies )
14. Assessing the genuineness for any planned disposals of assets. (e.g. Vacant Building or Land to
confirm the mitigating factor )
15. Obtaining written / management representation confirming the B.O.Ds view that company is a
going concern. (to be linked and covered in ISA 580)
Case 1: Going concern assumption is appropriate BUT a material uncertainty exists which is
adequately disclosed in the F/S………….
In this situation, the opinion on the financial statements will be unmodified but the auditor's report will
include a separate para headed ‘Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern’
The report is standard/unmodified, except for this new paragraph, placed immediately after the ‘Basis
for Opinion Para’…
In this situation, as inadequate disclosure has been made of the material uncertainty, the auditor’s
opinion will be modified - either a qualified or adverse opinion will be issued depending on the
magnitude of the uncertainty.
An extract from the auditor's report where a qualified opinion is issued is provided by the ISA
follows.
Qualified Opinion
In our opinion, except for the incomplete disclosure of the information referred to in
the Basis for Qualified Opinion paragraph, the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects (or ‘give a true and fair view of’) the financial position of the Company as at December 31,
20X0, and of its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with
international Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs).
The Company's financing arrangements expire and amounts outstanding are payable on 19 March
20X1. The Company has been unable to conclude re-negotiations or obtain replacement-financing.
This situation indicates that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt on the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not fully disclose this
matter.
Case 1(b): Going concern assumption is appropriate but a material uncertainty Exists which is not
adequately disclosed in the F/S….( Impact is Material and Pervasive )
Adverse Opinion
In our opinion, because of the omission of the information mentioned in the Basis for
Adverse Opinion section of our report, the accompanying financial statements do not present fairly
(or do not give a true and fair view of), the financial position of the Company as at
Dec………….
Basis for Adverse Opinion
The Company’s financing arrangements expired and the amount outstanding was payable on
December 31, 20X1. The Company has been unable to conclude re-negotiations or obtain replacement
financing and is considering filing for bankruptcy. This situation indicates that a material uncertainty
exists that may cast significant doubt on the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The
financial statements do not adequately disclose this fact.
Case 3: Management unwilling to make or extend its assessment
In some circumstances, the auditor may ask management to make or extend its assessment. If
management does not do this, a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion may be
appropriate, because it may not be possible for the auditor to obtain sufficient appropriate audit
evidence regarding the use of the going concern assumption in the preparation of the financial
statements.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. From a given scenario identify Inherent Risk, Control Risk & Detection
Risk / or Identify the audit risks for a N.P.O and explain the auditors
response in this regard.
3. Briefly explain the impact on the audit approach in the case of Not for
Profit organization.
4. Briefly discuss why control environment is weak in the case of a Not for
Profit organization.
Expenses
Risk of completeness of donations
Detection Risk
detection risk (the risk that the auditor will fail to identify any material error or misstatement in
performing the audit – e.g It’s the first year or no proper documentation trail / or no supporting
documents).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Explain how the audit of small Not-for-profit organizations differs from the audit of for-profit
organizations
The duties and responsibilities of the auditors in respect of small not-for-profit organization are same
as those for a larger / profit-making organisation. However, the nature, timing and extent of the audit
procedures vary from entity to entity according to the judgement of the auditor.
Also, not-for-profit organizations are voluntary organizations and mostly non-professionals are
employed by these organizations. Many times, the trustees and employees are otherwise involved in
different operations. They cannot devote their whole time to the non-profit organizations.
This does not mean that there is no internal control not-for-profit entities. Although a formal internal
control may not exist, the manager may control the operations of the entity effectively. However, due
to the lack of a formal control system, it is difficult for an auditor to obtain audit evidence.
Whereas, in the case of larger entitles, an auditor can rely on the control system and reduce the extent
of audit procedures, in the case of small entities he normally has to extensively perform substantive
audit procedures.
Generally, those working in not-for-profit organizations are volunteers who may not be aware of the
importance of effective internal controls or, due to cost constraints; it is not possible to have effective
controls in this type of organisation
For a matter material to the financial statements, if sufficient appropriate audit evidence is not
available, he may obtain management representation and evaluate its reliability
Principally the auditor should not prepare the basic accounting records including making journal
entries etc. but generally he is asked to help management in preparation of the financial statements.
4.The purpose of a not-for-profit organisation and of an audit.
The primary objective of this kind of organisation is other than making a profit. They serve society as a
whole or a section of the society. They run on the money contributed for the well-being of the society
therefore this money should be used for the society and not for the benefit of those running the
organisation.
This difference in primary objectives makes a difference to the objective of the audit. The audit
objective of profit-making organizations is to express an independent audit opinion on the truth and
fairness of the financial statements. On the other hand, the objective of the audit of not-for profit
organizations is to determine whether the grants, donation, membership fees etc are utilized to meet the
organization's objectives and not misappropriated
Example: In a society by the employees of a company, membership fees are taken to run the society
and a benevolent (charitable)fund is created. According to the constitution, out of this fund, financial
help is provided to the family of the member after his demise. This is the proper utilisation of the fund.
However, this fund is utilised to purchase a flat for a member of management, this will not be proper
utilization of the society's fund since the fund is being used for the benefit of a particular person. This is
misappropriation of the fund.
Where the audit is a statutory requirement the auditor has to express an opinion on the truth and
fairness of the financial statements.
5.Source of money
Not-for--profit organizations, e.g. charitable institutions, schools, hospitals etc. accept donations and
grants to create funds and use that money for charitable purposes.
ln the case of clubs, associations, societies etc. members pay subscriptions and the club uses that money
to provide services to members and to run the club
An auditor has to ensure that the grants, donations etc. are utilised for the purpose for which they are
obtained (to meet the objectives of the organization) and are not misappropriated.
The constitution of AWT states that administration costs should not exceed 10% of its income. Due to
this restriction, AWT has employed only one accountant who works on part time basis.
The constitution further requires AWT to maintain separate bank accounts for donations collected for
education and meals. Donors are requested to mention the purpose of donation. Donation received for
a specific purpose cannot be spent for any other purpose.
Required:
Identify the risks which AWT’s auditor would need to consider.
Answer 6 (b):
There is a risk of embezzlement in cash collection and inventory.
Donation for food are recorded in donation for education account and vice versa.
Contributions are spent on other than intended purpose.
There is a risk that the money spent on administration is not recorded as administration cost
and is misclassified.
Since only one person is responsible for managing the accounts, there is a lack of segregation of
duties and hence risk of fraud and error may arise.
Since there is no full-time person to look after the accounts, there is a risk that transactions are
not recorded on a timely basis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eukare has a detailed constitution which explains how the charity’s income can be spent. The
constitution also notes that administration expenditure cannot exceed 10% of income in any year. The
charity’s income is derived wholly from voluntary donations. Sources of donations include:
i. Cash collected by volunteers asking the public for donations in shopping areas,
ii. Cheques sent to the charity’s head office,
iii.Donations from generous individuals. Some of these donations have specific clauses attached to them
indicating that the initial amount donated (capital) cannot be spent and that the income (interest) from
the donation must be spent on specific activities, for example, provision of sports equipment.
The rules regarding the taxation of charities in the country Eukare is based are complicated, with only
certain expenditure being allowable for taxation purposes and donations of capital being treated as
income in some situations.
Required:
b. Identify areas of inherent risk in the Eukare charity and explain the effect of each of these risks on the
audit approach. (12 marks)
c. Explain why the control environment may be weak at the charity Eukare. (4 marks)
(20 marks)
Answer 4 (b + c):
b. Inherent Risk Areas
Detailed constitution
The charity has a detailed constitution which sets out how money may be spent. This increases the
inherent risk of the audit.
The auditors will need to spend time examining and becoming familiar with the constitution and design
their audit procedures with this in mind.
Special attention will need to be devoted to income and expenditure to ensure that the 10% limit is not
breached legitimately.
Cash donations:
Some of the donations received will be in the form of cash collected from the public. There is a risk of
misappropriation of cash as a result.
Controls over cash should be examined as this is an area open to misappropriation and theft.
Where donations have been received with clauses attached the auditor will need to do detailed work to
ensure the conditions have not been breached.
Taxation legislation
There are complex rules in place regarding the taxation of charities.
The audit team will need to familiarise itself with the taxation rules for charities to ensure that this area
correctly dealt with.
c) Control environment
The control environment at Eukare may be weak, for a number of reasons.
The staff working at the charity may be volunteers who may not have accounts experience and who may
also not work there full-time. There may also be a high staff turnover because of the nature of the work.
There may be a lack segregation of duties in place due to the number of staff working at the charity. This
mean that trustees may play a role in the day to day running of the charity and there is therefore a risk of
override of any controls that are in place.
The charity may not have an internal audit department in place due to its size or the equivalent of an
audit committee to monitor its effectiveness.
There may also be lack of budgetary information being produced on a timely basis which increases
control risk from the auditor's point of view.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hart Co made a rights issue in the year. This is a The audit team should obtain legal
non-standard transaction and there is increased risk documentation in support of the rights issue to
that the issue has not been recorded correctly. agree the number of shares issued and the rights
price. They should recalculate the split of share
The rights issue has been made at a premium and capital and share premium and agree this to the
therefore requires to be split into its share capital journal entry to record the rights issue.
and share premium elements. The audit team should also agree that disclosures
are adequate and consistent with standards and
There is a risk that the split between share capital legislation.
and share premium has not been accounted for
correctly and that these balances are misstated.
There is also a risk that the rights issue has not been
disclosed in accordance with accounting standards
and local company legislation.
Hart Co's payroll function is outsourced to an Discuss with management any changes to the
external service organisation. extent of records maintained at
Hart Co since the prior year audit and any
A detection risk arises as to whether sufficient and monitoring of controls which has been
appropriate evidence is available at Hart Co to undertaken by management over payroll.
confirm the completeness and accuracy of controls
over the payroll cycle and liabilities at Consideration should be given to contacting the
the year end. auditor of the service organisation, Chaz Co, to
confirm the level of controls in place. A type 1 or
Consideration should be given to the level of type 2 reports could be requested.
controls in place at the service organisation and
whether the data is reliable. If any errors occurred Consider the extent to which sufficient
these could result in the wages and salaries expense appropriate audit evidence can be obtained from
and any accruals being misstated. records held at Hart Co in respect of the wages
and salaries expense and liabilities.
Directors' remuneration disclosures have been made Discuss this matter with management and review
in line with IFRS® Standards but not local the requirements of local legislation to determine
legislation. if the disclosure in the financial statements is
included appropriately.
Where the local legislation is more comprehensive
than IFRS Standards it is likely that the company
must comply with local legislation.
a) The auditor should consider the following matters while obtaining understanding of APL and its
environment. This will involve following factors:
Obtaining the understanding of the tourism industry in which APL operate.
Inquire specific laws and regulation applicable on tourism industry.
Understand APL’s operations, the range of services it offers and its dynamics.
Obtain the ownership structure, management structures and types of current and planned
investments.
Assess APL’s selection and application of accounting policies, including whether they are
appropriate for its business and consistent with the industry and the applicable financial
reporting framework.
Obtain understanding of APL’s strategies of managing the tough competition and assess the
business risk which may result in risks of material misstatement.
Review the APLs financial performance.
b)
S. No. Business risk Audit Risk
(i) Breach of the safety standards may result Liabilities of APL might be understated as a
in litigation against APL. result of non-recognition of the provision in
respect of the litigation.
Due to the increasing competition, any
such incident will also affect APL’s The disclosure regarding contingencies may not
reputation. adequately disclose the effects of the pending
litigation.
(ii) Frequent upgradation of equipment is The frequent upgradation of equipment might
required to prevent accidents. decrease the useful life of the equipment or
might need to be charged off instead of
capitalizing them.
(iii) APL’s competitor has introduced similar If the revenues keep on decreasing, APL’s
products at a low price which has affected equipment may need to be tested for
APL’s revenue. impairment.
(iv) Due to bank loan, APL will now have to In order to meet bank’s covenants, APL may
manage its debt load and all the terms and overstate its revenue or understate its expenses to
conditions of that loan. depict a better picture to its lenders.
(v) There is a risk that a client may cancel its There is a risk that APL may recognize
booking. Dealing with cancellation will commission as revenue
also effect revenue flow of APL.
(vi) It seems that APL may also face cash flow There is a risk that receivable from customers is
challenges as it would have to pay its debt overstated and a provision for doubtful
on time, whereas it would be receiving customers has not been recorded.
money from its customers later on.