0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views3 pages

1949 Basic Principles Committee Report

The Basic Principles Committee, formed in 1949 to draft Pakistan's constitution, presented its interim report in 1950, proposing a bicameral legislature and a strong central government. The report faced significant criticism, particularly from East Pakistan, for underrepresentation and the designation of Urdu as the state language, leading to a postponement of its consideration. This backlash highlighted the growing concerns in East Pakistan regarding their political safety and representation within the proposed federal structure.

Uploaded by

Hina Mughal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
47 views3 pages

1949 Basic Principles Committee Report

The Basic Principles Committee, formed in 1949 to draft Pakistan's constitution, presented its interim report in 1950, proposing a bicameral legislature and a strong central government. The report faced significant criticism, particularly from East Pakistan, for underrepresentation and the designation of Urdu as the state language, leading to a postponement of its consideration. This backlash highlighted the growing concerns in East Pakistan regarding their political safety and representation within the proposed federal structure.

Uploaded by

Hina Mughal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Basic Principle Committee Interim Report (1950)

 The Basic Principles Committee was formed on 12th March 1949 by the first Constituent
Assembly of Pakistan.
 The Basic Principles Committee was comprised of 24 members. These individuals were
not required to be members of the first Constituent Assembly.
 It was headed by Maulvi Tameezuddin Khan and Liaquat Ali Khan was its Vice
President.
 The task assigned to the Basic Principles Committee was to determine the basic
principles for framing the future constitution of Pakistan.
 There were three sub-committees set-up under the Basic Principles Committee:

 Sub-committee on federal and provincial constitution and distribution of powers


 Sub-committee on franchise
 Sub-committee for judiciary

The task of these committees was to make a recommendation regarding the area of their
expertise.

 On 28th September 1950, the BPC presented its interim report to the Constituent
Assembly.

The salient features of this report were as following:

 Objectives Resolution should be made part of the constitution and should serve as the
directive principle of state policy.
 The state of Pakistan was to be a federation.
 The Central Legislature was to be bicameral.
 It would consist of a House of Unit (Upper House) with 100 members and a House of
People (Lower House) with 400 members.
 The Upper House was to be the representative institution of the provinces, elected by the
provincial legislature. While the Lower House was to be elected by the people based on
adult franchise.
 The tenure of both the Houses was to be five years and both were to enjoy equal power.
 The decisions regarding budget or monetary bills were to be decided in joint sessions of
the two houses.
 The Head of state was to be elected by a joint session of the two houses for a term of five
years and would work on the advice of the Prime Minister.
 The federal legislature had the authority to remove the head of state.
 Each province was to have its legislature; elected based on adult franchise for a term of
five years.
 The Head of the provincial legislature was to be elected by the head of state for a term of
five years and he was to work on the advice of the Chief Minister.
 Legislative power was to be divided into three lists:

 The Federal list comprising of 67 subjects on which the central legislature would
legislate.
 The Provincial list comprising of 35 items, the provincial legislature would
legislate on these subjects.
 The Concurrent list of 37 items on which both the central and provincial
legislatures had the authority to legislate. The residuary powers were vested in the
center.

 In case of a dispute, the Supreme Court had the authority to interpret the constitution.
 The procedure to amend the constitution was very rigid; it required majority approval
from the central and provincial legislatures.
 The Head of the state was given added powers like the authority to abrogate the
constitution and issue ordinances.
 Urdu was to be the state language.
 The Supreme Court was the head of the judiciary. It would consist of the Chief Justice
and 2 to 6 judges. And High Courts for each province were to be established.
 A Board of Ulama would be appointed by the head of state and provincial governors to
examine the process of law-making and to ensure that laws were in accordance with the
Quran and Sunnah.

 The reaction to this report proved counterproductive and was not conducive to success.
As a consequence popularity of the First Constituent Assembly was badly maligned.
Resultantly Liaquat Ali Khan was forced to postpone his considerations on account of
severe criticism on the part of East Pakistan. This delay led to many complications in the
progress of the First Constituent Assembly.
 This report was criticized strongly by S.C. Chattopadyaya and East Pakistan.
 The crux of criticism was related to underrepresentation in the central legislature
and the proposal for a strong center with vast powers on financial matters.
 East Pakistan was given an equal number of seats in the Upper House, the same as
West Pakistan. Thus it reduces the principle of majority and turned East Pakistan
into a minority.
 Moreover, the interim report was preposterous for East Pakistan since it keeps
Urdu as the national language and Bengali was nowhere in the constitutional
arena.
 As a result of this reaction, Liaquat Ali Khan postponed the consideration of the report
and invited new suggestions.
To include public opinion he called forth general comments and suggestions by the
public on the report. For this, a committee was set up headed by Sardar Abdur Rab
Nishter, who presented a report in the Constituent Assembly in July 1952.
 Resultantly, the struggle for making a constitution caused serious apprehension in the
mind of East Pakistan. They felt that the Bengali interests were not safe in such a state of
affairs. There could have been rational and mature negotiations with productive and
pleasing results for the sake of nationalism, but that did not happen.
Even though the constitutional deadlock was later vented off but it was too late, the
interim report inevitably posed an ever-impending threat in the minds of East Pakistan
that their interests were not safe given the supremacy accorded to West Pakistan in a
federation.

You might also like