Chapter 1

Does God exist?

• Is there objective evidence that God exists?
• What are the consequences of atheism?
• Where did God come from?
• Can we know God personally?

T
HE Bible begins with the statement: “In the beginning God
created the heavens and the earth” (Gen. 1:1). God’s existence
is assumed, self-evident. In Psalm 14:1 we are told, “The fool
has said in his heart, There is no God! They acted corruptly; they have
done abominable works, there is none who does good.”
Here we see that the Bible connects corrupt thoughts about God—
especially denying His very existence—with corrupt morals. And it is
true that if there is no God, no Creator who sets the rules, then we are
set adrift morally. When the children of Israel forgot their Creator in the
times of the Judges, when they had no-one leading them in being faithful
to God, “… every man did that which was right in his own eyes” (Judges
21:25), and chaos reigned.
We see the same thing happening today. Countries where the people
once honoured God, recognizing that “God was in Christ reconciling
the world to Himself” (2 Cor. 5:19), experienced unpre­cedented security
and prosperity. Those same countries today are crumbling as people turn
their backs on God. “Righteousness lifts up a nation, but sin is a shame
to any people” (Prov. 14:34).
As nations turn their backs on God, living as if He does not exist,
sin abounds—political corruption, lying, slander, public displays
of debauchery, violent crime, abortion, theft, adultery, drug taking,
drunkenness, gambling and greed of all kinds. Economic woes follow
as taxes increase and governments borrow money to pay for bigger and
~7~
8 ~ Chapter 1

bigger police forces, jails, and social security systems to patch up the
problems.
Underpinning this abandonment of faith in God is the widespread
acceptance of evolutionary thinking—that everything made itself by
natural processes; that God is not necessary. There is ‘design’, such
people will admit, but no designer is necessary. The designed thing
designed itself! This thinking, where the plain-as-day evidence for
God’s existence (Rom. 1:19–20) is explained away, leads naturally to
atheism (belief in no god) and secular humanism (man can chart his
own course without God). Such thinking abounds in universities and
governments today.
Some of the greatest evil seen has been perpetrated by those who
have adopted an evolutionary approach to morality—Lenin, Hitler,
Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot. Atheistic evolutionist Sir Arthur Keith
acknowl­edged of Hitler:
“The German Führer … is an evolutionist; he has consciously
sought to make the practice of Germany conform to the theory of
evolution.”1
Many millions have suffered terribly and lost their lives because of
this atheistic way of thinking. Atheism kills, because without God there
are no rules—anything goes! Atheists are at the forefront of efforts to
legitimize abortion, euthanasia, drug taking, prostitution, pornography
and promiscuity. All these things cause misery, suffering and death.
Atheism is the philosophy of death.
Now atheists love to point to
a t r o c i t i e s c o m­m i t­t e d b y
supposed ‘Christians’—the
Crusades and Northern Ireland
are favourites.2 If the people
com­mit­ting these terrible deeds
were indeed Christ­ians, they
were/are being inconsistent
with their own standard of mor­
ality (e.g. “do not murder”,
“love your enemies”).
However, Stalin, for example,
was being consistent with his,

1. Keith, A., Evolution and Ethics, Putman, US, p. 230, 1947.

2. The Crusades were a response to Islamic oppression. See Spencer, R., The politically
incorrect guide to Islam (and the Crusades), Regnery Publishing, US, 2005.
 Does God exist? ~ 9

because, being an atheist (after reading Darwin), he had no objective

basis for any standard of morality. Keith admitted that Hitler was also
consistent with his evolutionary philosophy.
Christianity says, “God is love”, “love one another” and “love your
enemies”. Such love is self-sacrificing. Consequently, Christians have
been at the forefront in helping the sick, looking after the orphaned and the
aged, feeding the hungry, educating the poor, and opposing exploitation
through such things as child labour and slavery.
Atheism, with its evolutionary rationale, says ‘love’ is nothing more
than self-interest in increasing the chances of our genes surviving in our
offspring or our close relatives. In the ‘struggle for survival of the fittest’,
where is the basis for compassion? Hitler’s death camps grew out of
his desire for the ‘Aryan race’ to win the battle for ‘the preservation of
favoured races in the struggle for life’ (the subtitle to Darwin’s Origin).
However, not only is atheism destructive, it is logically flawed at its
very roots because there must be a creator, as we shall see.

Some social statistics for Australia, showing a relationship between decline of church
involvement of children and increased social problems. Other statistics, such as divorce,
rape, etc., show similar trends. Church influence declined dramatically with the introduction
of evolution into schools in the 1950s and ’60s. Statistics for other ‘Christian’ countries
show similar relationships.3

3. Sources of data: Childhood church contact from Why don’t people go to church? National
Church Life Survey (2002). Social stats from State of the Nation: a century of change, The
Centre for Independent Studies, Australia, 2001; cis.org.au.
10 ~ Chapter 1

Biblical evidence for the

existence of a divine author
The Bible, as well as proclaiming the existence of God, also bears witness
that God exists, because only divine inspiration can explain the existence
of this most remarkable of books. The characteristics that point to divine
authorship are:4,5,6
The Bible’s amazing unity. Despite being penned by more than 40
authors from over 19 different walks of life over some 1,600 years, the
Bible is a consistent revelation from the beginning to the end. Indeed
the first and last books of the Bible, Genesis and Revelation, dovetail
so perfectly—telling of ‘Paradise Lost’ and ‘Paradise Regained’
respectively—that they speak powerfully of their divine authorship
(compare, for example, Gen. 1–3 and Rev. 21–22).
The Bible’s amazing preservation. In spite of political and religious
persecution, the Bible remains. The Roman Emperor Diocletian, following
an edict in ad 303, thought he had destroyed every hated Bible. He
erected a column over the ashes of a burnt Bible to celebrate his victory.
Twenty-five years later, the new emperor, Constantine, commissioned
the production of 50 Bibles at the expense of the government! The Bible
is today available in far more languages than any other book.
The Bible’s historical accuracy. Nelson Glueck, famous Jewish
archaeologist, spoke of what he called “the almost incredibly accurate
historical memory of the Bible, and particularly so when it is fortified
by archaeological fact”.7 William F. Albright, widely recognized as one
of the great archaeologists, stated:
“The excessive scepticism shown toward the Bible by important
historical schools of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, certain
phases of which still appear periodically, has been progressively
discredited. Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy
of innumerable details, and has brought increased recognition to the
value of the Bible as a source of history.”8
Sir William Ramsay, regarded as one of the greatest archaeologists

4. The basic concept for this section comes from Willmington, H.L., Willmington’s Guide to
the Bible, Tyndale House Publishers, US, pp. 810–824, 1981.
5. Geisler, N.L. and Nix, W.E., A General Introduction to the Bible, Moody Press, US, 1986.
6. McDowell, J., Evidence that Demands a Verdict 1, Campus Crusade for Christ, US, 1972.
7. Cited in Geisler and Nix, 1986, p. 68.
8. Cited in Geisler and Nix, 1986, p. 68.
 Does God exist? ~ 11

ever, trained in mid-nineteenth century German historical skepticism and

so did not believe that the New Testament documents were historically
reliable. However, his archaeological investigations drove him to see that
his skepticism was unwarranted. He had a profound change of attitude.
Speaking of Luke, the writer of the Gospel of Luke and the Acts of the
Apostles, Ramsay said, “Luke is a historian of the first rank … he should
be placed along with the greatest of historians.”9
At many specific points archaeology confirms the Bible’s accuracy.10
There are many particulars where skeptics have questioned the Bible’s
accuracy, usually on the basis of there being no independent evidence (the
fallacy of arguing from silence), only to find that further archaeological
discoveries have unearthed evidence for the biblical account.11
The Bible’s scientific accuracy.
Some examples: that Earth is round (Isa. 40:22);
Earth is suspended in space without
support (Job 26:7); the stars are
countless12 (Gen. 15:5); the
h y d r o l o g i c c y c l e ; 11 s e a
c u r r e n t s ; 13 l i v i n g t h i n g s
reproduce after their kind; 14
many insights into health,
hygiene,15 diet, physiology (such as
the importance of blood,16 e.g. Lev.
17:11); the first and second laws of
thermodynamics (e.g. Isa. 51:6), and many other things.17
The Bible’s prophetic accuracy. The Bible states that the accurate
foretelling of events is the province of God. God said:

9. Ramsay, W., Bearing of Recent Discoveries on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament,
Baker Books, US, p. 222, 1953.
10. See creation.com/archaeology. For comprehensive information on the Bible and
archaeology, see Associates for Biblical Research; biblearchaeology.org.
11. McDowell, 1972.
12. People of old thought that the stars could be counted—there were about 1200 visible stars.
Ptolemy (ad 150) dogmatically stated that the number of stars was exactly 1056. See Gitt,
W., Counting the stars, Creation 19(2):10–13, 1997; creation.com/star-count.
13. Sarfati, J., The wonders of water, Creation 20(1):44–47, 1997; creation.com/water.
14. Batten, D., Dogs breeding dogs? That’s not evolution, Creation 18(2):20–23, 1996; creation.
com/dogs.
15. Wise, D.A., Modern medicine? It’s not so modern! Creation 17(1):46–49, 1994; creation.
com/modern-medicine.
16. Hodge, A., Life is in the blood, Creation 33(3):12–15, 2011; creation.com/blood.
17. Morris, H.M., The Biblical Basis of Modern Science, Baker Book House, US, 1984.
12 ~ Chapter 1

“I have foretold the former things from the beginning; and they
went out of My mouth; and I made them hear; I acted suddenly; and
they came about. … I declared it to you from the beginning. Before it
happened I revealed it to you; lest you should say, ‘My idol has done
them, and my graven image, and my molten image, has commanded
them.’” (Isa. 48:3, 5).
One will search in vain for one line of accurate prophecy in
other religious books, but the Bible contains many specific prophecies.
McDowell6 documents 61 prophecies regarding Jesus alone. Many of
these, such as His place, time, and manner of birth, betrayal, manner of
death, burial, etc., were beyond His control. McDowell also thoroughly
documents 12 detailed, specific prophecies regarding Tyre, Sidon,
Samaria, Gaza and Ashkelon, Moab and Ammon, Petra and Edom,
Thebes and Memphis, Nineveh, Babylon, Chorazin-Bethsaida-Capern­
aum, Jerusalem and Palestine. He shows how these prophecies were not
‘post-dictions’ (that is, written after the event).
The probability of all these things coming to pass by chance is
effectively zero. Only the wilfully ignorant (2 Peter 3:5) could deny this
evidence that God must have inspired these prophecies.
The Bible’s civilizing influence. The Bible’s message elevated
the blood-drinking ‘barbarians’ of the British Isles to decency. It is the
basis of English common law, the American Bill of Rights and the great
democracies such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada,
Australia, and New Zealand.
The Bible has inspired the noblest of literature—from Shakespeare,
Milton, Pope, Scott, Coleridge and Kipling, to name a few—and
the art of such as Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Raphael, and
Rembrandt. The Bible has inspired the exquisite music of Bach,
Handel, Haydn, Mendelssohn and Brahms. Indeed, the decline in
acceptance of the biblical world view in the West has been paralleled
by a decline in the beauty of art.18
Today the message of the Bible still transforms. Animistic tribal
groups in the Philippines are today still being delivered from fear, and
former cannibals in Papua New Guinea and Fiji now live in peace, all
because of the Gospel.
The Bible’s absolute honesty. Someone has said, “The Bible is not
a book that man could write if he would, or would write if he could.”
The Bible does not honour man, but God. The people in the Bible have
feet of clay; they are shown ‘warts and all’. Against the backdrop of

18. Schaeffer, F., Escape from Reason, Inter-Varsity Press, UK, 1968.
 Does God exist? ~ 13

their sinfulness and unfaithfulness, God’s holiness and faithfulness

shine through.
Even the heroes of the faith (Heb.
11) have their failures recorded,
including Noah (Gen. 9:20–24),
Moses (Num. 20:7–12), David
(2 Sam. 11), Elijah (1 Kings 19), and
Peter (Matt. 26:74). On the other
hand, the enemies of God’s people
are often praised—for example,
Artaxerxes (Neh. 2), Darius the
Mede (Dan. 6), and Julius (Acts
27:1–3). These are clear indications
that the Bible was not written from
a human perspective.
The Bible’s life-transforming
message. In San Francisco, a man
once challenged Dr Harry Ironside
The Gospel has transformed the lives of to a debate on ‘Agnosticism19 versus
animistic people.
Christianity’. Dr Ironside agreed, on
one condition: that the agnostic first provide evidence that agnosticism
was beneficial enough to defend. Dr Ironside challenged the agnostic to
bring one man who had been a ‘down-and-outer’ (a drunkard, criminal,
or such) and one woman who had been trapped in a degraded life (such
as prostitution), and show that both of these people had been rescued
from their lives of degradation through embracing the philosophy of
agnosticism. Dr Ironside undertook to bring 100 men and women to the
debate who had been gloriously rescued through believing the Gospel
the agnostic ridiculed. The skeptic withdrew his challenge to debate Dr
Ironside.
The message of the Bible mends lives broken by sin, which separates
us from our holy Creator. In contrast, agnosticism and atheism, like all
anti-God philosophies, destroy.
God is revealed in Jesus Christ
The Bible says, “… but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son,
whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created
the world. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint
of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power”
(Hebrews 1:2,3a, ESV).

19. Agnosticism is another form of unbelief that denies the truth of God’s Word by claiming
that we cannot know if God exists. It is in practice little different from atheism.
14 ~ Chapter 1

Jesus fulfilled over 60 prophecies in the Old Testament, as mentioned

earlier.
He claimed to speak as God. He did things that only God can do,
such as raise the dead to life (John 11:17–12:17), calm storms (Matthew
8:23–27), forgive sins (Mark 2:1–7), claimed to send prophets (Matthew
23:34) and the Holy Spirit (Luke 24:49), and accepted worship (Matthews
14:33). He was not just a prophet or a good man; He was far more than
that and said so. The converted atheist, C.S. Lewis, said that there were
three options: that Jesus was either a liar, a lunatic or he was Lord (God).
His life and Resurrection proved that He was indeed Lord. No wonder
that soon after His death, the New Testament authors recognized Him
as God and Creator (John 1:1–3, Colossians 1:15–20).
No one disputed that the tomb where they put Jesus’ body was empty
on the third day. However, all attempts to explain this, other than He
was resurrected from the dead, fail. Various people have set out to prove
that the Resurrection did not happen, using appropriate historical/legal
methods, and ended up coming to faith in Christ as Lord. Lawyer Frank
Morison was one, and presents the evidence in the book Who moved
the stone?20
Jesus’ influence on the world has been profound, for individuals and
for society. The Bible says, “If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation,
old things have passed away, behold, all things have become new.”
(2 Corinthians 5:17). Many have testified to a life-transforming encounter
with the risen Christ. John Newton, former slave trader, had his life turned
around (he wrote the hymn Amazing Grace). He encouraged William
Wilberforce in his quest to abolish slavery.
Faith in Christ has transformed society: the concept of sanctity of
human life (all made in the image of God) ended barbaric practices such
as the Roman games, infant exposure, euthanasia of the infirm, old,
etc.; literacy and education for the common man; charity/benevolence
(Good Samaritan); civil society (“love your enemies”); representative
parliamentary democracy with a balance of powers (because of the
fallen-ness of man); legal protection (multiple witnesses—Deuteronomy
19:15, 2 Corinthians 13:1); beautiful art and music; elevation of women;
universities, hospitals, orphanages, and much more. Modern science
arose out of Christian thinking.21

20. See also Kumar, S. and Sarfati, J., Christianity for Skeptics, Ch. 4, Creation Book Publishers,
US, 2012; creation.com/cfs.
21. Sarfati, J., The Biblical roots of modern science, creation.com/roots, 29 September 2009.
 Does God exist? ~ 15

Other evidence for the

Creator-God of the Bible22
The universal tendency of things to run down and to fall apart shows
that the universe had to be ‘wound up’ at the beginning. It is not eternal.
This is totally consistent with “In the beginning God created the heavens
and the earth” (Gen. 1:1).
The changes we see in living things are not the sorts of changes that
suggest that the living things themselves came into being by any natural,
evolutionary process. Evolution from molecules to man needs some way
of creating new complex genetic programs, or information. Mutations
and natural selection lead to loss of infor­mation.
The fossils do not show the evolutionists’ expected transitions from
one basic kind of organism to another. This is powerful evidence against
the belief that living things made themselves over eons of time.
Evidence that the universe is relatively ‘young’ also contradicts the
belief that everything made itself over billions of years. Because the
events are so improbable, lots of time is thought to help the cause of
the materialists.
The traditions of hundreds of indigenous peoples from around the
world—stories of a global flood, for example—corroborate the Bible’s
account of history, as does linguistic and biological evidence for the
closeness of all human ‘races’.
The explosion in knowledge of the intricate workings of cells and
organs has shown that such things as the blood clotting system could
not have arisen by a series of accidental changes. The instructions, or
information, for specifying the complex organization of living things is
not in the molecules themselves (as it is with a crystal), but is imposed
from outside. All this demands an intelligent creator who vastly exceeds
our intelligence.

The myth of atheism and science

Many today think that science is anti-God. Atheists encourage this
view by claiming that their way of thinking is ‘scientific’. In claiming
this, they are merely redefining science to exclude God. In fact, science
began to flourish only when the biblical view of creation took root in
Europe as the Reformation spread its influence. The presuppositions that
enabled a scientific approach to investigating the world—that the created
universe is real, consistent, under­standable, and possible to investigate,

22. For more details on these evidences, see the Appendix to this chapter.
16 ~ Chapter 1

for example—came from the Bible. Even non-Christian historians of

science such as Loren Eiseley have ac­knowl­edged this.23 Consequently,
almost every branch of science was either founded, co-founded, or
dramatically advanced by scientists who believed in the Bible’s account
of creation and the Flood.24,25 And there are many scientists today who
believe the Bible.26

Is it science?
Science has given us many wonderful things: men on the moon,
cheap food, modern medicine, electricity, computers, and so on. All
these achievements involve doing experiments in the present, mak­ing
inferences from these results and doing more experiments to test those
ideas. Here, the inferences, or conclusions, are closely related to the
experiments and there is often little room for speculation. This type of
science is called process, or operational, science, and has given us many
valuable advances in knowledge that have benefited mankind.
However, there is another type of science that deals with the past,
which can be called historical, or origins, science. When it comes to
working out what happened in the past, science is limited because we
cannot do experiments directly on past events, and history cannot be
repeated. In origins science, observations made in the present are used
to make inferences about the past. The experiments that can be done in
the present that relate to the past are often quite limited, so the inferences
require a deal of guesswork. The further in the past the event being
studied, the longer the chain of inferences involved, the more guesswork,
and the more room there is for non-scientific factors to influence the
conclusions—factors such as the religious belief (or unbelief) of the
scientist. So, what may be presented as ‘science’ regarding the past may
be little more than the scientist’s own per­sonal worldview. The conflicts
between ‘science’ and ‘religion’ occur in this historical science, not in
operational science. Unfortunately, the respect earned by the successes
of operational science confounds many into thinking that the conjectural
claims arising from origins science carry the same authority.

23. Eiseley, L., Darwin’s Century: Evolution and the Man who Discovered it, Doubleday, US,
p. 62, 1969; see also Sarfati, J., The biblical roots of modern science, creation.com/roots,
29 September 2009.
24. Morris, H.M., Men of Science, Men of God, Master Books, US, 1982.
25. Sarfati, J. and Bates, G. (eds), Busting Myths: 30 Ph.D. scientists who believe the Bible
and its account of origins, Creation Book Publishers, 2015; creation.com/bm, and creation.
com/bios.
26. Ashton, J., In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation, New
Holland Publishers, Australia, 1999; creation.com/s/10-2-117.
 Does God exist? ~ 17

When it comes to historical science, it is not so much the evidence in

the present that is debated, but the inferences about the past. Scientists
who believe the record in the Bible, which claims to be the Word of
God,27 will come to different conclusions from those who ignore the
Bible. Wilful denial of God’s Word (2 Peter 3:3–7) lies at the root of
many disagreements over ‘historical science’.

Who created God?28

Skeptics often taunt Christians with ‘If God created the universe, then
who created God?’ (and many genuine thinkers ponder similar ideas).
But the Bible defines God as the uncreated (i.e. eternal) Creator of the
universe, and what applies within the universe need not apply to God, so
the question ‘Who created God?’ becomes illogical, just like ‘To whom
is the bachelor married?’
So a more sophisticated questioner might ask, ‘If the universe needs
a cause, then why doesn’t God need a cause? And if God doesn’t need
a cause, why should the universe need a cause?’ The following reasoning
stands up to scrutiny:
• Everything which has a beginning has a cause.29
• The universe has a beginning.

27. Psalm 78:5, 2 Timothy 3:14–17, 2 Peter 1:19–21. God, who inspired the Bible, has
always existed, is perfect, and never lies (Titus 1:2). See also Psalm 119 to understand
the importance of God’s Word.
28. This section is based upon Sarfati, J., If God created the universe, then who created God?
Journal of Creation 12(1):20–22, 1998; creation.com/whomadeGod.
29. Actually, the word ‘cause’ has several different meanings in philosophy. But here the word
refers to the efficient cause, the chief agent causing something to be made.
18 ~ Chapter 1

• Therefore the universe has a cause.

It is important to stress the words in bold type. The universe
requires a cause because it had a beginning, as will be shown below.
God, unlike the universe, had no beginning, so does not need a cause.
In addition, Einstein’s General Relativity, which has much experimental
support, shows that time is linked to matter and space. So time itself would
have begun along with matter and space at the beginning of the universe.
Since God, by definition, is the Creator of the whole universe, He is the
Creator of time. Therefore He is not limited by the time dimension He
created, so He has no beginning in time. Therefore He does not have, or
need to have, a cause.
In contrast, there is good evidence that the universe had a beginning.
This can be shown from the Laws of Thermodynamics, the most
fundamental laws of the physical sciences.
• 1st Law: The total amount of mass-energy in the universe is constant.
• 2nd Law: The amount of energy in the universe available for work
is running down, or entropy30 is increasing to a maximum.

Total energy (First Law) If the total

Energy of the universe

amount of mass-
energy is limited, and
Available energy decreasing
(Second Law) the amount of usable
Heat death
energy is decreasing,
then the universe
cannot have existed
forever, otherwise it
period of observations
Time
would already have
The amount of available energy in the universe is always ex­h austed all usable
decreasing, clear evidence that it had a beginning. energy and reached
what is known as ‘heat
death’. I.e. all radio­active atoms would have decayed, every part of the
universe would be the same temperature, and no further work would be
possible. So the best solution is that the universe must have been created

30. Entropy is a measure of disorder, or of the decrease in usable energy.

 Does God exist? ~ 19

with a lot of usable energy, and is now running down.31

Now, what if the ques­tioner accepts that the universe had a beginning,
but not that it needs a cause? But it is self-evident that things that begin
have a cause—no one really denies; it is commonsense. All science,
history, and law enforcement would col­lapse if this law of cause and
effect were denied.32 Also, the universe cannot be self-caused—nothing
can create itself, because it would need to exist before it came into
existence; a logical absurdity.
In summary
• The universe (including time itself) can be shown to have had a
beginning.
• It is unreasonable to believe something could begin to exist without
a cause.
• The universe therefore requires a cause, just as Genesis 1:1 and
Romans 1:20 teach.
• God, as Creator of time, is outside of time. Therefore, He had no be-
ginning in time, has always existed, and so does not need a cause.33,34
Whichever way you look at it—the evidence from the Bible, the
incredibly complex, organized information in living things, or the origin
of the universe—belief in an all-powerful, all-knowing Creator God,
as revealed in the Bible, not only makes sense, but is the only viable
explanation.

31. Oscillating (yoyo) universe ideas were popularized by atheists like the late Carl Sagan and
Isaac Asimov, solely to avoid the notion of a beginning, with its implications of a creator.
But the laws of thermodynamics undercut that argument—as each one of the hypothetical
cycles would exhaust more and more usable energy. This means every cycle would be larger
and longer than the previous one, so looking back in time there would be smaller and smaller
cycles. So the multicycle model could have an infinite future, but can only have a finite past.
Also, there is far too little mass to stop expansion and allow cycling in the first place, and no
known mechanism would allow a bounce back after a hypothetical ‘big crunch’.
32. Some physicists assert that quantum mechanics violates this cause/effect principle and can
produce something from nothing, but this is not so. Theories that the universe is a quantum
fluctuation must presuppose that there was something to fluctuate—their ‘quantum vacuum’
is a lot of matter-antimatter potential—not ‘nothing’. Also, if there is no cause, there is no
explanation why this particular universe appeared at a particular time, or even why it was
a universe and not, say, a banana or a cat which appeared. This universe can’t have any
properties to explain its preferential coming into existence, because it would not have any
properties until it actually came into existence.
33. Craig, William L., Apologetics: An Introduction, Moody, US, 1984, and “The existence of
God and the beginning of the universe”, at leaderu.com/truth/3truth11.html.
34. Geisler, N.L., Christian Apologetics, Baker Books, US, 1976. But beware of the unfortunate
(and unnecessary) friendliness towards the unscriptural big bang theory.
20 ~ Chapter 1

The Christian knows God!

To one who is a genuine Christian, there is no doubt about God’s
existence. The Bible says,
“For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of
God. For you have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear,
but you have received the Spirit of adoption by which we cry, Abba,
Father! The Spirit Himself bears witness with our spirit that we are
the children of God” (Rom. 8:14–16).
The Bible here says that Christians have a personal relationship
with God. This is the testimony of those who have realized their sinfulness
in the sight of Almighty God and the dire consequences of their sin,
have repented of their sin, and have accepted the forgiveness of God
made possible through Jesus’ death and Resurrection. All such genuine
Christians have received the Holy Spirit of God and so have assurance
that they are ‘children of God’. They can indeed know that they have
eternal life (1 John 5:13).
Appendix: Non-biblical evidence for
the Creator God of the Bible
1. Natural law
There is a universal tendency for all systems of matter/energy to run
down.35 Available energy is dissipated and order is lost. Without either a
programmed mechanism or intelligent action, even open systems36 will
tend from order to disorder, from information to non-information, and
towards less availability of energy. This is the reason why heat flows from
hot to cold, and why the sun’s energy will not make a dead stick grow
(as opposed to a green plant, which contains specific, preprogrammed
machinery to direct the energy to create a special type of order known
as specified complexity).
Applied to the origin of the first life, this denies that such specified
complexity can possibly arise except from outside information impressed
on to matter. Applied to the whole universe, which is acknowledged as
winding down to ‘heat death’ (that is, ‘cosmos to chaos’), this implies a
fundamental contradiction to the ‘chaos to cosmos, all by itself’ essence

35. This is an aspect of the Second Law of Thermodynamics; see previous section.
36. Those able to exchange energy/matter with their surroundings.
 Does God exist? ~ 21

of evolutionary philosophy.37,38
So, the universe had to be ‘wound up’ at the beginning and it could
not have existed eternally. This requires some agent outside the universe
to wind it up—just as a clock cannot wind itself!

2. Living things
Observed changes in living things head in the wrong direction to support
evolution from protozoan to man (macro-evolution).
Selection from the genetic information already present in a population
(for example, DDT resistance in mosquitoes) causes a net loss of genetic
information in that population. A DDT-resistant mosquito is adapted to
an environment where DDT is present, but the population has lost genes
present in the mosquitoes that were not resistant to DDT because they died
and so did not pass on their genes. So natural selection and adaptation
involve loss of genetic information.
From information theory and a vast number of experiments and
observations, we know that mutations (copying mistakes) are incapable
of creating the new genes that are needed to explain increased functional
complexity.39 Instead, they cause ‘noise’ during the transmission of
genetic information, in accordance with established scientific principles
of the effect of random change on information flow, and so destroy the
information.40 Not surprisingly, thousands of human diseases are now
linked to mutations.
This decrease in genetic information (from mutations, selection/
adaptation/speciation and extinction) is consistent with the concept of
original created gene pools—with a large degree of initial variety—being
depleted since.
Since observed ‘micro’ changes—such as antibiotic resistance in
bacteria and insecticide resistance in insects—are informationally down-
hill, or at best horizontal, they cannot accumulate to give the required
(up-hill) changes for ‘macro’ evolution, regardless of the time period.41
These small changes are erroneously used as ‘proofs of evolution’ in
biology courses, yet they cannot be extrapolated to explain ameba-to-man

37. Thaxton, C.B., Bradley, W.L. and Olsen, R.L., The Mystery of Life’s Origin, Lewis and
Stanley, US, 1984. These experts in thermodynamics show that thermodynamics is a huge
problem for the naturalistic origin of life.
38. Wilder-Smith, A.E., The Natural Sciences Know Nothing of Evolution, Master Books, US, 1981.
39. Spetner, L., Not by Chance! Shattering the Modern Theory of Evolution, The Judaica Press,
Inc., US, 1997.
40. This is similar to the noise added in the copying of an audio cassette tape. The copy is
never better than the master. See creation.com/infotheory.
41. Lester, L.P. and Bohlin, R.G., The Natural Limits of Biological Change, Probe Books, US,
1989.
22 ~ Chapter 1

evolution. Such extrapolation is like arguing that if an unprofitable business

loses only a little money each year, given enough years it will make a
profit. The observed changes do, however, fit a Creation/Fall model well.
3. Fossils
Although Darwin expected millions of transitional fossils to be found,
they have not been found; only a small number of disputable ones.
Evolutionist Dr Colin Patterson of the British Museum of Natural History
responded as follows to a written question asking why he failed to include
illustrations of transitional forms in a book he wrote on evolution:
“… I fully agree with your comments on the lack of direct
illustration of evolutionary trans­itions in my book. If I knew of any,
fossil or living, I would certainly have included them. You suggest
that an artist should be used to visualize such transformations, but
where would he get the information from? I could not, honestly,
provide it, and if I were to leave it to artistic licence, would that not
mislead the reader?
“I wrote the text of my book four years ago. If I were to write
it now, I think the book would be rather different. Gradualism is
a concept I believe in, not just because of Darwin’s authority, but
because my understanding of genetics seems to demand it. Yet Gould
and the American Museum people are hard to contradict when they
say there are no transitional fossils. As a palaeontologist myself, I
am much occupied with the philosophical problems of identifying
ancestral forms in the fossil record. You say that I should at least
‘show a photo of the fossil from which each type of organism was
derived.’ I will lay it on the line—there is not one such fossil for
which one could make a water­tight argument.”42
Even Archaeopteryx, often claimed as the tran­sition between
reptiles and birds, shows no sign of the crucial scale-to-feather or
leg-to-wing transition. While it is always possible to maintain faith in
evolution by belief in unob­servable mechan­isms,43 the evi­dence of such
a systematic paucity of the anticipated evolu­tionary ‘links’ on a global
scale is powerful, positive support for biblical crea­tion, regardless of any
argument about how and when fossils may have formed.

42. Letter (written 10 April, 1979) from Dr Colin Patterson, then Senior Palaeontologist at
the British Museum of Natural History in London, to Luther D. Sunderland, as quoted in
Sunderland, L.D., Darwin’s Enigma, Master Books, US, p. 89, 1984. See Bates, G., That
quote!—about the missing transitional fossils; creation.com/pattquote.
43. Such as ‘punctuated equilibrium’, or other secondary assumptions.
 Does God exist? ~ 23

4. The age of things

The evidence for a ‘young’ Earth/
universe is, by definition, evidence
for biblical creation, as naturalistic
evolution, if it were at all possible,
would require eons. There is
much evidence that the universe is
relatively young,44 such as the decay
Image by Steve Cardno

of Earth’s magnetic field, including

rapid paleomagnetic reversals, 45
fragile organic molecules in fossils
supposedly many millions of years
An artist’s impression of Archaeopteryx old, 46 not enough helium in the
atmosphere,47 not enough salt in the
sea, carbon-14 in coal and oil supposedly millions of years old (see
48

Chapter 4), polystrate fossils that extend through strata supposedly

representing many millions of years, inter-tonguing of non-sequential
geological strata,49 small number of supernova remnants,50 magnetic
fields on ‘cold’ planets, and much more (see Chapter 4).
Elapsed time extending back beyond one’s own lifetime cannot be
directly measured, so all arguments for either a long or a short age are
necessarily indirect and must depend on acceptance of the assumptions
on which they are inevitably based.
Young-earth arguments make sense of the fact that many fossils
show well-preserved soft parts. This requires rapid deposition and rapid
hardening of the encasing sediment for such fossils to exist. Observations
of multiple geologic strata and canyons, for example, forming rapidly
under catastrophic conditions in recent times indicate that the entrenched

44. Morris, J.D., The Young Earth, Master Books, US, 2007; creation.com/young-earth. See
also, Batten, D., Age of the earth; creation.com/age, 2009.
45. Sarfati, J., The earth’s magnetic field: evidence that the earth is young, Creation 20(2):15–
17, 1998; creation.com/magfield.
46. For example, Wieland, C., Sensational dinosaur blood report! Creation 19(4):42–43, 1997;
creation.com/dino-blood; see also a 2009 update; creation.com/schweit2.
47. Sarfati, J., Blowing old-earth beliefs away, Creation 20(3):19–21, 1998; creation.com/
helium.
48. Sarfati, J., Salty seas, Creation 21(1):16–17, 1998; creation.com/salty.
49. That is, where there are ‘missing’ layers in between, according to the standard geologic
column and the ‘millions of years’ timescale, suggesting that the missing layers do not
represent the many millions of years claimed. See Snelling, A., The case of the ‘missing’
geologic time, Creation 14(3):30–35, 1992; creation.com/misstime.
50. Sarfati, J., Exploding stars point to a young universe, Creation 19(3):46–48, 1997; creation.
com/snr.
24 ~ Chapter 1

slow-and-gradual, vast-age thinking may well be markedly in error.51,52

5. Cultural–anthropological evidence
Hundreds of worldwide traditions among indigenous peoples about a
global flood, each with features in common with the biblical account,
provide evidence of the reality of that account. Also widespread, but less
so, are accounts of a time of language dispersal. Linguistic and biological
evidence has recently revealed a hitherto unrealized genetic closeness
among all the ‘races’ of people (see Chapter 18), consistent with a recent
origin from a small population source. This denies the previously widely
held belief that human races evolved their characteristic features during
long periods of isolation. Molecular studies suggest that, relatively
recently, one woman provided the mitochondrial DNA which gave
rise to the sequences in all people alive today.53 Such evidence may be
squeezed into an evolutionary model, but it was not a direct prediction
of it. However, it is directly consistent with biblical creation.

6. Design and complexity

Incredibly complex coordinated biological systems are known in which
no conceivable part-coordinated, part-functioning, simpler arrangement
would be other than a liability.54 Some examples are the blood-clotting
mechanism, the bacterial flagellum (used for propulsion), the photosyn­
thetic apparatus, and the pupal transformation of caterpillars to butter­flies.
Examples abound in living things.

The highly integrated transformation of a cater­pillar to a pupa to a butterfly defies evolution’s

(small) step-wise change as an explanation for its existence.

The immense com­plex­ity of the human brain, its crea­tivity and power
of abstract reas­oning, with capacities vastly beyond that re­quired for sheer

51. Mount St. Helens: Modern Day Evidence for the World Wide Flood DVD, featuring Dr
Steve Austin; creation.com/s/30-9-620.
52. See Chapter 4, What about carbon dating?
53. Wieland, C., A shrinking date for ‘Eve’, J. Creation 12(1):1–3, 1998; creation.com/eve.
54. Behe, M.J., Darwin’s Black Box, The Free Press, US, 1996; creation.com/s/10-3-081.
 Does God exist? ~ 25

survival, is perhaps the most ‘ob­vious’ evidence for in­telligent creation.

At the molecular level, the organization that char­acterizes living
things is inherently different from, for example, a crys­tal ar­range­ment.
The func­tion of a given protein, for instance, depends upon the assembly
sequence of its constituents. The coded information required to generate
these sequences is not intrinsic to the chemistry of the components (as
it is for the structure of a crystal) but extrinsic (imposed from outside).
During reproduction, the information required to make a living
organism is impressed upon material substrates to give a preprogrammed
pattern, by systems of equal (or greater) complexity (in the parent
organism/s) which themselves had the same requirement for their
formation. Without preprogrammed machinery, no spontaneous,
physico-chemical process is known to generate such information-bearing
sequences—this requires the operation of outside intelligence.
The most reasonable inference from such observations is that outside
intelligence was responsible for a vast original store of biological
information in the form of created populations of fully functioning
organisms.55 Such intelligence vastly surpasses human intelligence—
again consistent with the concept of God as revealed in the Bible.

Image by Caleb Salisbury

55. Gitt, W., Compton, B. and Fernandez, J., Without Excuse—Information: the key to life,
Creation Book Publishers, US, 2011; creation.com/without-excuse.
26 ~ Chapter 1

Conclusion
There is so much evidence that God exists that the Bible says that
people have no excuse for denying his existence. Romans Chapter 1
reads like a commentary on today’s world:
“18For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all
ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness
suppress the truth. 19For what can be known about God is plain to
them, because God has shown it to them. 20For his invisible attributes,
namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly
perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have
been made. So they are without excuse. 21For although they knew
God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they
became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
22
Claiming to be wise, they became fools, 23and exchanged the glory
of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds
and animals and reptiles. 24Therefore God gave them up in the lusts
of their hearts to impurity, to the dishonoring of their bodies among
themselves, 25because they exchanged the truth about God for a lie
and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who
is blessed forever! Amen.
“26For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For
their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to
nature; 27and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women
and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing
shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty
for their error. 28And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God,
God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be
done. 29They were filled with all manner of unrighteousness, evil,
covetousness, malice. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit,
maliciousness. They are gossips, 30slanderers, haters of God, insolent,
haughty, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, 31foolish,
faithless, heartless, ruthless. 32Though they know God’s decree that
those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them
but give approval to those who practice them.” (ESV)
God calls us all to stop such foolishness (sin), acknowledge our need
of forgiveness from our Creator and receive such forgiveness through
what Jesus Christ has done for us in paying the penalty for our sins in
dying in our place on the cross.