0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views29 pages

Module 4

The document discusses various op-amp configurations including block view, gain parameters, frequency response, and design considerations for telescopic and folded cascode op-amps. It emphasizes the importance of gain error, settling time, and output swing in op-amp design, providing mathematical relationships and exercises for practical understanding. Additionally, it compares single-stage and two-stage op-amps, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations.

Uploaded by

h20240139
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
57 views29 pages

Module 4

The document discusses various op-amp configurations including block view, gain parameters, frequency response, and design considerations for telescopic and folded cascode op-amps. It emphasizes the importance of gain error, settling time, and output swing in op-amp design, providing mathematical relationships and exercises for practical understanding. Additionally, it compares single-stage and two-stage op-amps, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations.

Uploaded by

h20240139
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 29

OP-AMPS: Block View, Gain

Parameter and Frequency, Cascode,


Folded Cascode, 2-Stage Op-Amps,
Gain Boosting

Dipankar Pal,
Dept. of EEE & EI,
BITS-Pilani, K. K. Birla Goa Campus
Op-Amp: As a Block (contd.)
The circuit is designed for a nominal of 10, i.e., 1+R1/R2=10.
Determine the minimum value of A1 for a gain error of 1% or less.

Vout A1 R1 + R2 A1
= =
Vin R2 R2 R1 + R2
1+ A1 + A1
R1 + R2 R2
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Op-Amp: As a Block
Vout  R1   R1 + R2 1 
Assuming A1>>10 we can approximate:  1 + .1 − . 
Vin  R2   R2 A1 
R1 + R2 1
where the quantity . represents the gain error.
R2 A1

From above, it is clear that to have a gain error of 1% or less A1


should be 1000 or more.

Op-Amp Frequency Response: Block Perspective


• Open-loop gain drops as frequency
goes up.
• fu : unity-gain; f3-dB : 3-dB frequency
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Frequency Response: Exercise
Assume the op amp is a single-pole
voltage amplifier. If Vin is a small
step, calculate the time required
for the output voltage to reach
within 1% of its final value. What
unity-gain bandwidth must the op
 R2 
amp provide if 1+R1/R2 ≈10 and the Vin − Vout . A(s ) = Vout
settling time is to be less than 5ns.  R1 + R2 
For simplicity, assume the low- A(s )
frequency gain is much greater 
Vout
(s ) =
. A(s )
Vin R2
than unity. 1+
R1 + R2
A(s ) =
A0
For a single-pole system where  0 is the 3dB
s
1+
0
cut-off and A0 . 0 is the unity-gain bandwidth. It leads to (contd.)
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Frequency Response: Exercise A0
R2
1+ . A0
R1 + R2
Vout
(s ) = R
A0
=
s
Vin s
1+ 2
. A0 + 1+
R1 + R2 0  R2 
1 + . A0 .0
 R1 + R2 
This indicates that the closed loop transfer function is a single pole
system with a time constant ( ) where:
1
=
 R2 
1 + . A0 .0
 R1 + R2 
R2
Since low frequency loop gain .A0 is >> 1, time constant ( )
R1 + R2
 R1  1
becomes   1 + .
 R2  A00 Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Frequency Response: Exercise

The output step response for Vin = au (t ) can now be written as with
 R1   −t

Vout (t )  a1 + .1 − e .u (t )

 R2   
 R1 
the final value VF  a1 +  . For 1% settling Vout  0.99  VF . Thus
 R2 
 −t
1% 
1 − e   = 0.99 t1% =  ln100  4.6
 
 

For 1% settling time of 5ns,   1.09ns . We also get:

 R1 
A00 = 1 +  /  = 9.21Grad / s(1.47Ghz )
 R2 
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Op-Amp: Open Loop Topology

Small Signal Open Loop Gain at Low Frequency ( Av )

 RoN  RoP 
Av = g mN  
 RoN + RoP 
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Op-Amp Voltage Follower: Closed Loop (feed back)

Assume all the overdrives are


0.3 V and the VT = 0.7 V
for both NMOS and PMOS.
Vin(min)→ VGS1 + over-drive for current source
= VGS1+0.3=(0.3+VT)+0.3=0.3+0.3+0.7=1.3V
Vin(max)→ when M1 on triode-border = VDD-mod(VGS3)+VT= 3-(0.3+0.7)
+0.7=2.7V
Rout ( open ) Rout ( open ) Rout ( open ) 1
Rout = =  
1 +  . Av 1 + g mN .Rout ( open ) g mN .Rout ( open ) g mN
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Telescopic Cascode Op-Amp: For High Gain

(
Av = g mN . g mN r 2 oN ) (g mP r 2
oP )

Drawback - Output swing is limited to:


2.VDD − (VODM 1 + VODM 3 + VCSS + VODM 5 + VODM 7 ) where subscript
OD denote overdrive.

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Other Drawback in Telescopic Cascode Op-Amp
Shorting output to input to design unity gain buffer requires
output to be within a maximum and minimum value.

Condition for M2 to be
in saturation limits:
Vout  VX + VTH 2

Again for M4 to be in
saturation: Vout  Vb − VTH 4
Thus we get
Vb − VTH 4  Vout  V X + VTH 2  Vb − VTH 4  Vout  Vb − VGS 4 + VTH 2

(substituting V X = Vb − VGS 4 )
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Telescopic Cascode Op-Amp (contd.)

The range (=Vout-Max-Vout-Min) is:

Vout −range = VTH 4 + VTH 2 − VGS 4

This can be maximized by


reducing overdrive of M4.

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Table for Calculating Important Parameters

CH7 CMOS Amplifiers 12


Telescopic Cascode Op-Amp: Design Exercise

Specification: VDD=3 V,
differential output swing = 3V,
power dissipation = 10mW,
voltage gain = 2000. Given
μnCox=60 μA/V2, μpCox=30μA/V2,
λn=0.1V-1, λp=0.2V-1 (for an
effective channel length of 0.5
μm), γ=0, VTHN= |VTHP|=0.7 V

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Telescopic Cascode: Design Exercise (Contd.)
• Power budget: Itotal= 3.330 mA. Hence: IM9 = 3 mA, IMb1 + IMb2 =
330 μA (apportioned on estimated drain current need)

• Output swing:
- Node X(Y) swing=1.5 V,
- M3-M6 in saturation
- |VOD7|+|VOD5|+VOD3+VOD1+VOD9=1.5 V
- Since M9 carrying largest current, VOD9≈0.5 V (chosen)
- Since M5-M8 suffer from low mobility, |VOD5|=|V|≈0.3 V,
VOD1=VOD3 ≈ 0.2 V (chosen)

• W/L: From ID=(1/2)μCox(W/L)(VGS−VTH)2 and using minimum


length (0.5μm) for all MOS to minimize capacitances.
(W/L)1−4=1250, (W/L)5−8=1111, (W/L)9=400

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Telescopic Cascode: Design Exercise (Contd.)
• Gain: Av ≈ gm1[(gm3ro3r)|| (gm5ro5ro7)]. Since λ∝1/L.

We can therefore increase the


 nCoxWI D 1 WL width or length
g m .ro  . 
L I D ID
• Modulation:
Since M1~M4 appear in signal path for keeping minimum
capacitance, we double the width and length of M5~M8 to
increase ro (gm remains constant). Choosing
(W/L)5−8=1111μm/1μm ⇒ Av ≈ 4000

• CM level: Minimum allowable input CM level=VGS1+VOD9 =1.4 V.

• Bias: Vb1, min=VGS3+VOD1+VOD9=1.6V;


Vb2, max=VDD−(|VGS5|+|VOD7|)=1.7V

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Folded Cascode Fundamentals

Genesis of Folded
Cascode Topolgy

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Folded Cascode Topology

In left, ISS carries currents of both channels of cascode stage. In right,


input pair requires an additional bias current ⇒ ISS1 = (ISS/2)+ID3.
Folded topology consumes more power.

Input common mode (CM): Vin in Telescopic Cascode cannot be higher


than Vb1-VGS3+VTH1. The same for Folded Cascode cannot be less than
Vb1-VGS3+|VTHP|.

Substrates can be connected to VSS for M1(2).


Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Folded Cascode Op-Amp Implementation

• Current implementation: Current sources


of original folded cascade are replaced by
M5~M10.

• Maximum output swing: Proper


choice of Vb1 and Vb2 gives
VDD-VOD3-VOD5-|VOD7|-|VOD9|
as peak-to-peak swing on
each side.

• Improvement: The swing is


larger in folded cascode.

Note: M5 and M6 may require high overdrive to minimize their


capacitance-contribution to nodes X and Y.
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Folded Cascode Op-Amp Topology

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Gain Estimation: Folded Cascode Op-Amp

Rop = (( g m 7 + g mb 7 ).ro 7 ).ro 9


Since (gm3+gmb3)−1||ro3 << ro1||ro5;
Rout = Rop (g m3 + g mb 3 ).ro 3 .(ro1 ro 5 )
Iout ≈ ID1 ⇒ Gm ≈ gm1; Av=Gm.Rout

Av  g m1 .( g m3 + g mb 3 ).ro 3 (ro1 ro 5 ) (g m7 + g mb7 ).ro 7 .ro9 


Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Telescopic Cascode & Folded Cascode: Comparison
• For comparable dimensions, PMOS has a lower gm. Further in
Folded Cascode ro1 and ro5 comes in parallel at output resistance,
making the gain 2/3 times lower than Telescopic Cascode.

• Folded Cascode consumes more power.

• It has a “pole” at folding point which is closer to origin (due to


added capacitances: Ctot= CGS3+CSB3+CDB1+CGD1+(CGD5+CDB5) - higher
than Telescopic Cascode by CGD5+CDB5.
Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Folded Cascode: NMOS Input Stage

Has higher gain at the cost of “poles” at folding point closer to origin.

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Single Ended Output: Telescopic Cascode Topology

• VX=VDD−|VGS5|−|VGS7|, limits maximum Vout to VDD− |VGS5| −


|VGS7|+|VTH6|and wastes one VTHp in the swing (figure on the left)
• To overcome, M7 and M8 are biased at edge of triode region.
Another improved topology is given in the figure on the right.
• Disadvantages (of figure on the left):
- it provides only half the output voltage swing
- it contains a mirror pole at node X Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”
Single Stage Vs. Two Stage Op-Amp

• Op-Amps seen so far make small signal input-current to flow


directly through output resistance. They are single stage op-amps.

• There gain is obtained by multiplying transconductance with output


resistance.

• Gain can be increased by cascoding at the cost of output swing.

• Where gain and output swing are both desirable, the stage giving
high gain and the one giving high output swing are isolated – to
design a two stage op-amp.

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Two Stage Op-Amp
• First (gain) stage can be any of the topologies discussed so far.

• 2nd stage usually is a CS-stage which gives high output swing

• Overall Gain: Gain 1st Stage


(Av1)× Gain 2nd Stage ( Av 2)
Av1 = g m1 .(ro1 ro 3 )(= g m 2 .(ro 2 ro 4 ))

Av 2 = g m 5 .(ro 5 ro 7 )(= g m 6 .(ro 6 ro8 ))

• Output swing: VDD- |VOD5(6)|


-VOD7(8)

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits”


Two Stage Cascode Op-Amp (for increased gain)

Av  g m1, 2 .(g m 3, 4 + g mb 3, 4 ).rO 3, 4 .rO1, 2  (g m5 ,6 )


+ g mb 5, 6 .rO 5 ,O 6 .rO 7 ,O8  
(g m 9 ,10 .(rO 9,10 rO11,12 ))

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits” and Ching Y. Yang, Dept. of EE, National Chung Hsing University
Two Stage Op-Amp with Single Ended Output

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits” and Ching Y. Yang, Dept. of EE, National Chung Hsing University
Single Stage Op-Amp with Gain Booster

Rout = g m 2 .rO 2 .rO1 Rout  A1 g m 2 .rO 2 .rO1

Increasing impedance by feedback. Rout = 1 + ( g m 2 + g mb 2 ).rO 2 .rO1 + rO 2

Assuming g m .rO 1 we get Rout  ( g m 2 + g mb 2 ).rO 2 .rO1

If we ignore body-effect then Rout  A1 g m 2 .rO 2 .rO1

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits” and Ching Y. Yang, Dept. of EE, National Chung Hsing University
Gain Boosting in Cascode State (Regulated Cascode)

Av  g m1 ( g m 2 .rO 2 .rO1 )(
. g m 3 .rO 3 )
Drawback:

Since VX = VGS, the minimum Vout = VGS3+VOD2 is higher (in a simple

cascode with proper choice of VG2 it would be VOD1+VOD2)

Ref: Behzad Razavi, “Design of Analog Integrated Circuits” and Ching Y. Yang, Dept. of EE, National Chung Hsing University

You might also like