readerPDF-1 PHP
readerPDF-1 PHP
1
Debre Berhan University, College of Natural and Computational Science, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.61593/DBU.BIRJSH.01.07.01
Abstract
Tea (Camellia sinensis) and Coffee (Coffea arabica) are the most popular drinks next to
water for their stimulant activity. They contain different metabolites that are beneficial to
human health including the common and the psychoactive caffeine. Therefore, assessment of
the caffeine level in such natural resources is used as a tool for evaluating their quality. The
aim of this study was comparing the caffeine level of tea leaves and roasted coffee beans
grown and marketed in Ethiopia. In this work, the standard caffeine isolated from both tea
leaves and coffee beans using chromatographic techniques was characterized using
spectroscopic techniques. The caffeine contents of the extracts from tea leaves and roasted
coffee beans were analyzed using UV-Vis spectrophotometer and found 90.75 ppm and 94.25
ppm, respectively. Antibacterial activity assay of isolated caffeine against Escherichia coli,
Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhi, and Listeria monocytogen was also evaluated and
the results showed its potential activity against most tested bacteria.
Tea (Camellia sinensis) and Coffee health benefits. Caffeine is one of the
Degaga,2020; Amamo, 2014) and the most 2009; Tiwari et al, 2011; Chen et al, 2012;
al, 2015) due to the phenolics as the major the name coffee was coined from the area
locally named as Kaffa, and it was then have been recognized as important
introduced into the globe. Caffeine found attributes of their sensory quality
in tea and coffee determine the (Minbale, 2009). Most of the aroma is due
characteristic flavor and stimulant effect of to the volatile coffee oil fraction, which
tea and coffee (Mussatto et al, 2011; comprises about 10% of the roasted beans.
Adepoju et al, 2017; Minbale, 2009) The volatile oil contains mainly ethyl
together with other constituents. Arabica acetate and furfural with traces of several
coffee with its lower sourness, bitterness other compounds (Minbale, 2009). The
and better flavor is the most cultivated and fixed oil fraction of coffee oil is non-
more liked by consumers (Minbale, 2009). volatile. The most important compounds in
Robusta coffee beans contained higher coffee that is relevant for flavor and aroma
concentration of caffeine and chlorogenic are caffeine, chlorogenic acid, trigoneline,
acid compared with Arabica, while and sucrose. Carboxylic acids are
Arabica is richer in trigonelline. Beans of responsible for sourness while chlorogenic
Arabica and Robusta contain about 1% acid and caffeine determine bitterness
and 2% caffeine, respectively (Minbale, (Minbale, 2009; Mumin et al, 2006;
2009; Mumin et al, 2006; Samiullah et al, Samiullah et al, 2015; Parvathy et al, 2014;
2015). Gopinandhan et al, 2014; Grujić-Letic et
al, 2016).
The tea leaves and roasted coffee beans are
brewed, and commonly consumed as tea Excessive use of caffeine can cause
and coffee beverages, respectively. They adverse side effects, anxiety, depression,
contain different metabolites that are difficulty sleeping, nausea, restlessness,
beneficial to human health including their tremors, a fast heart rate, irritability,
popular caffeine which is responsible for increasing of blood pressure, and disrupt
their psycho-activity. Assessment of the normal heart rhythm. The consumption of
caffeine level in tea leaves and coffee caffeine containing beverages such as tea
beans grown in Ethiopia is crucial to their and coffee should be limited. In order to
quality and this was the focus of this study. aware consumers and the scientific
In the roasting process, characteristic odor community, the study focused on the
2
and flavor are developed together with the analysis of the caffeine content of some tea
and coffee samples collected from Debre
formation of dark brown color. Aroma,
sourness and bitterness of coffee brews Berhan.
mark (Atomssa et al, 2011). respectively (Table 1). The amount of pure
caffeine obtained after purification using 4
Antibacterial activity of caffeine 97% of ethanol was 2.7% (tea) and 2.8%
Four bacteria, namely, Escherichia coli, (coffee).
Salmonella thyphi, Listeria monocytogen
The International Research Journal of Debre Berhan University, 2023
Abebe and Gashu, BIRJSH, 2023, 7(1), 1–16
Sample Sample (g) Amount of caffeine Crude caffeine Caffeine (g), caffeine %
extracted (g) in extract, % after purification (g)
1-13B 50 1.6 3.2 1.3, 2.7
1-10B 50 1.8 3.6 1.4, 2.8
70
65
Transmitance (%)
60
3107 1025
55 1253
50
2943
45
1632
40 1720
1656
35
4000 3000 2000 1000 0 5
Wave number (cm-1)
The 1H NMR spectrum contained three is more deshielded than C-2 due to the
singlet signals at δ3.35, 3.53 and 3.95 ppm presence of the double bond at position 5
assignable to three methyl protons at 1’, 3’ which makes the carbon more
1
and 7’ (Table 2, structure 1). In the H electronegative arising from the
NMR spectrum, the peak at δ7.49 was delocalization of electrons either at
observed due to the olefinic proton at C-8. position 3 or 9. C-5 is bonded to N-7 and
The deshieldings observed in the spectrum the carbonyl group, C6=O; whereas C-4 is
are mainly due to the nitrogen bonded to bonded to two nitrogen atoms N-3 and N-
13
the hydrogens [23]. According to C- 9. Thus, the bridging carbon signals of
NMR and DEPT spectra of 1-13B, there both C-4 and C-5 are expected to be
are eight carbon signals. Signals at δ27.86, deshielded, but C4 is more deshielded
29.68 and 33.53 represented methyl mainly due to the two nitrogen atoms
carbons bonded to nitrogen at positions 1, attached to it, hence the lone pair of
3 and 7. Carbon signals at δ107.52 (q), electrons on the nitrogen at position 3 and
141.41 (t), 148.64 (q), and δ151.65 (q) and 9 increases the resonance structure. The
δ155.34 (q) were ascribed to C-5, C-8, C- signal at δ 141.41 is mainly due to the
4, C-2 and C-6, respectively. Signals at presence of the double bond (C-8) (Yang
position 2 and 6 are highly deshielded. C-6 et al, 2012; Sitkowski et al, 1995).
Table 2 .1H and 13C NMR spectral data of 1-13B compared with caffeine
2 δ 151.65 δ 151.3
4 δ 148.64 δ 148.3
5 δ 107.52 δ 107.1
6 δ 155.34 δ 154.9
The COSY (1H-1H correlation The COSY spectrum shows no any proton-
spectroscopy), HSQC (Heteronuclear proton coupling and HSQC shows the
Single Quantum Correlation) and HMBC proton signals at position 1’, 3’, 7’ and 8
(Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) correlated with the carbon signals at
experiments gives information on proton- position 1, 3, 7 and 8 respectively. From
proton coupling, correlations of the HMBC spectra, the N-methyl group at
chemical shift of proton with the chemical position 1 correlate with C-2 and C-6, the
shift of the directly bonded carbon and N- methyl group at position 3 correlates
utilizes multiple-bond couplings over two with C-2 and C-4 and the N- methyl group
or three bonds (J=2-15Hz) (Yang et al, at position 7 correlate with C-5 and C-8
2012; Sitkowski et al, 1995). (Table 3).
Based on spectroscopic analysis and components for coffee quality and human
literature reports, compound 1-13B/1-10B health problems if taken in excess, was
was identified as caffeine (1) (Sitkowski et analyzed using UV-Vis in tea and coffee
al, 1995). samples as follows.
0.7
y= 0.004x+0.153
2
0.6 R = 0.9992
Absorbance
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
20 40 60 80 100 120
Caffeine conc.(mg/L)
The slope and intercept values, which was only sensitive to the standard
0.004±8.247E-5 and 0.153 ± 0.0064, show drug, streptomycin. The diameters of the
the validity of this method for growth inhibition areas were in the range
quantification of caffeine in tea and coffee of 6.67-13.33 mm for caffeine isolated
samples. These results are in agreement from tea and 7.33.-13.67mm for that of
with those reported elsewhere coffee. In addition, the highest inhibitory
(Wondimkun et al, 2016; Chalmers, 2016). effects were observed against Salmonella
It can be suggested that, this method is typhi, while no activity was seen against L.
fast, simple and reliable for the estimation monocytogen using both extracts. The
of caffeine in tea and coffee. MIC values obtained confirm the existence
of a significant activity against the
Antibacterial activity of isolated caffeine
bacterial strains tested in this study, with
Caffeine has been reported to be an
MIC values ranging from 125- 250 µg/ml
inhibitor of microorganism growth in
for tea and 125- 500 µg/ml for coffee. The
various food and food products. The result
standard drug streptomycin was active
showed that caffeine shows antibacterial
against all reference bacteria (zone of
activity against E.coli, S.aureus and
inhibition range: 13.2-17.3 mm; MIC 3.6
Salmonella thyphi but not L. monocytogen,
(Figure 4, Table 6 and 7).
10
11
L. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 90
monocytogen
Tea Coffee
bacteria which suggests its use in food Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry,
Chen, H., Zhang, Y., Lu, X., & Qu, Z. matrices. Macedonian pharmaceutical
(2012). Comparative studies on the bulletin, 62(1).
physicochemical and antioxidant
properties of different tea extracts. Journal Kreicbergs, V., Dimins, F., Mikelsone, V.,
of Food Science and Technology, 49, 356- & Cinkmanis, I. (2011, May). Biologically
361. active compounds in roasted coffee.
In Proceedings of the 6th baltic conference
Dechassa, N., & Merga, M. (2022). Tea on food science and technology
(Camellia sinensis) Production, FOODBALT (pp. 110-115).
Opportunities, Challenges, and Future
Prospects in Ethiopia. Advances in Minbale Gashu (2009). Determination of
Agriculture, 2022. Caffeine level in Coffee and Artemisinin
in Artemisia annua, Unpublished MSc
Degaga, J. (2020). Review on coffee thesis, Addis Ababa University.
production and marketing in
Ethiopia. Journal of Marketing and Mohammed, M. J., & Al-Bayati, F. A.
Consumer Research, 67, 7-15. (2009). Isolation, identification and
purification of caffeine from Coffea
Farah, A. (2012). Coffee arabica L. and Camellia sinensis L.: A
constituents. Coffee: Emerging health combination antibacterial
effects and disease prevention, 1, 22-58. study. International Journal of Green
Pharmacy (IJGP), 3(1).
Gopinandhan, T. N., Banakar, M.,
Ashwini, M. S., & Basavaraj, K. (2014). A Mumin, A., Akhter, K. F., Abedin, Z., &
comparative study on caffeine estimation Hossain, Z. (2006). Determination and
in coffee samples by different characterization of caffeine in tea, coffee
methods. Int. J. Curr. Res. Chem. Pharma. and soft drinks by solid phase extraction
Sci, 1(8), 4-8. and high performance liquid
chromatography (SPE–HPLC). Malaysian
Grujić-Letić, N., Rakić, B., Šefer, E., Journal of Chemistry, 8(1), 045-051.
14
Milanović, M., Nikšić, M., Vujić, I., &
Milić, N. (2016). Quantitative Mussatto, S. I., Machado, E. M., Martins,
determination of caffeine in different S., & Teixeira, J. A. (2011). Production,
The International Research Journal of Debre Berhan University, 2023
Amare et al., BIRJSH, 2021, 5(1), 192-207
Samiullah, F. B., Bashir, F., Qasim, R., determination of caffeine level of wolaita
Fazal, M., Titus, K., & Khan, M. 02. zone, Ethiopia coffee using UV-visible