Annexure 1A

CONSTRUCTION OF CHECK DAM CUM CAUSE WAY ACROSS HALLA IN

BETWEEN HENJAGUNDANAHALLI - JAJUR VILLAGE OF KASABA HOBLI AND
CHECK DAM CAUSE WAY NEAR ALENA HALLI ,VADAGARAHALLI LINGAPURA
OF GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT
Calculation of maximum flood discharge :
1 By Ryve's formula as per IRC:SP-13-2004
(2/3)
Maximum Flood discharge, Q=CM
where, Q Flood discharge in Cumecs
M 1.2 catchment area in sq. km
C 9.75 Based on catchment area

By Ryve's Formula
Q = 9.8 x 1.200^(2/3)
Q = 11.01 cumecs
Say Q = 11.05 Cumecs
Length of stretch considered for bed slope calculation is 100.000 m
Total length (m) Drop (m) Slope (1 in ∆ L)
1 to 100 900.00 899
100.000 1.000 1 in 100.00
Say = 1 in 100.00
Calculation of HFL for ryve's discharge of 11.050Cumecs
Calculation of cross section of stream and wetted perimeter at site.
 Ground Average
Sl chaina HFL Depth of width of ∆h Perimet
level depth of flow Area (m2 )
No. ge (m) (m) flow (m) flow (m) (m) er (m)
(m) (m)
1 0.00 902.948 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 5.00 901.464 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 10.00 900.854 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4 15.00 899.766 0.58 0.29 5.00 1.46 0.00 5.00
5 20.00 900.348 899.600 0.75 0.67 5.00 3.33 0.00 5.00
6 25.00 900.690 0.00 0.37 5.00 1.87 0.00 5.00
7 30.00 901.401 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 35.00 901.401 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 40.00 902.456 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.65 15.00

Cross sectional area of Flow = A = 6.65 sq.m

Total Wetted Perimeter = P = 15.00 m
Hydraulic Radius R = A / P = 0.443 m
 Ground Average
Sl chaina HFL Depth of width of ∆h Perimet
level depth of flow Area (m2 )
No. ge (m) (m) flow (m) flow (m) (m) er (m)
(m) (m)

Ruogosity Coefficient = n 0.035

River Bed Gradient = S = 1 in n 100.00
Therefore S = 0.01000

Velocity of Flow V = (1 / n x R(2/3) x S(1/2) ) 1.66 m/s

Discharge Q = A x V 11.05 Cumecs
 2 By Area Velocity Method
Calculation of Discharge for Obeserved HFL of 901.300 m
Calculation of cross sectional area of stream and wetted perimeter at Bridge cum Vented Dam
Observe Average width
Sl. chainage Ground Depth of Area Perimet
d HFL depth of flow ∆ (m)
No (m) level (m) flow (m) (m2) er (m)
(m) flow (m) (m)
1 0.00 902.948 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 5.00 901.464 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 10.00 900.854 0.45 0.22 5.00 1.11 0.45 5.02
6 15.00 899.766 1.53 0.99 5.00 4.95 1.09 5.12
7 20.00 901.300 899.600 1.70 1.62 5.00 8.08 0.17 5.00
8 25.00 900.690 0.61 1.15 5.00 5.77 1.09 5.12
9 30.00 901.401 0.00 0.30 5.00 1.52 0.61 5.04
10 35.00 901.401 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
11 40.00 902.456 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 21.45 25.29

Cross sectional area of Flow = A = 21.450 sq.m

Total Wetted Perimeter = P = 25.294 m
Hydraulic Radius R = A / P = 0.848 m

Ruogosity Coefficient = n = 0.035

River Bed Gradient = S = 1 in n = 100.00
Therefore S = = 0.01000

(2/3) (1/2)
Velocity of Flow V = (1 / n x R xS ) 2.56 m/s
Discharge Q = A x V = 54.91 Cumecs
3 By 100 Years return period as given KERS
Regional Flood equation for 100 year return period flood given KERS
Q=[16.46-10.56(-ln(1-(1/T))0.15464]*A0.763)
A= 1.200 sq.km T= 100 Years
Q= 12.96 Cumecs (As per KERS formula for Region 1)
Calculation of HFL for discharge 12.96 Cumecs
Calculation of cross sectional area of stream and wetted perimeter at check dam site
Aver
age
Sl. chainag Ground Depth of width of Area Perimeter
HFL (m) depth ∆h (m)
No e (m) level (m) flow (m) flow (m) (m2) (m)
flow
(m)
1 0.00 902.948 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 5.00 901.464 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 20.00 899.600 0.95 0.48 15.00 7.15 0.95 15.03
6 25.00 900.553 900.690 0.00 0.48 5.00 2.38 0.95 5.09
7 30.00 901.401 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 35.00 901.401 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 40.00 902.456 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total 9.53 20.12
 Aver
age
Sl. chainag Ground Depth of width of Area Perimeter
HFL (m) depth ∆h (m)
No e (m) level (m) flow (m) flow (m) (m2) (m)
flow
(m)
Cross sectional area of Flow = A = 9.530 sq.m
Total Wetted Perimeter = P = 20.120 m
Hydraulic Radius R = A / P = 0.474 m
Ruogosity
Ruogosity
Coefficient
Coefficient
=n =n = 0.035
River River
Bed Gradient
Bed Gradient
=S== 1 in
S =n 1 in n = 100.00
Therefore S = = 0.01000
Velocity of Flow V = (1 / n x R(2/3) x S(1/2) ) = 1.74 m/s
Discharge Q = A x V = 16.60 cumecs

Section officer Assistant Executive Engineer

MI and GWD Sub-division,
Arsikere

Executive Engineer
MI and GWD division,
Hassan
 Annexure - 2A
CONSTRUCTION OF CHECK DAM CUM CAUSE WAY ACROSS HALLA IN
BETWEEN HENJAGUNDANAHALLI - JAJUR VILLAGE OF KASABA HOBLI
AND CHECK DAM CAUSE WAY NEAR ALENA HALLI ,VADAGARAHALLI
LINGAPURA OF GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN
DISTRICT

1 Afflux Calculation as per IRC-13 for maximum observed HFL of 901.300m

For Streams with non erodible beds, the afflux may be worked out by Molesworth
formula given below: as per IRC:89-1997.

h = V2 1 A2 1
17.87 65.5 A1
Where,
h=Afflux in meters
V-Velocity in un-Obstructed stream in meter per second
A= Un-obstructed sectional area of the river in square meters
a = Sectional area of the river at obstruction in square meters
A1 =Obstructed water way (A-a)

V = Normal velocity of flow = 2.56 m/s

A = Natural water way = 21.45 Sq.m
A1 =Obstructed water way = 20.4 sq.m
Peir
Number of vent 2
width of vent 4.00 m
Number of Main pier 1
Thickness of main pier 0.60 m
Depth of obstacle 1.700 m = 1.020 sq.m

Total Obstructed area (a) = 1.02 sq.m

h = V2 1 A2 1
17.87 65.5 A1

h = 0.200 m
As per the CBIP (1985) volume-1 and IS 6966(Part-I-1989), the allowable afflulux is 0.30m
0.20 < 0.3 Due to submerged structure not effected.

Affluxed flood level = 901.50 m

Hence provide = 901.500 + 0.90 m free board to accommodate afflux generated

Summary
Sl. No HFL Calculated Methods Q (m3/s) HFL (m) Remarks
1 By Ryve's formula as per IRC:SP-13-2004 11.05 900.348 From field
2 By Area Velocity Method 54.91 901.300 observation
3 By 100 Years return period as given KERS 16.60 900.553
Afflux Calculation as per IRC-13 for maximum Maximum
4 54.91 901.50
observed HFL of 901.300m possible HFL
5 HFL for the Proposed Check dam m 901.500
6 FTL for the Proposed Check Dam m 900.600
8 Sill level for the Proposed Check Dam m 899.600
9 Bridge Deck soffit level m 903.000
 Annexure - 3A
CONSTRUCTION OF CHECK DAM CUM CAUSE WAY ACROSS HALLA
IN BETWEEN HENJAGUNDANAHALLI - JAJUR VILLAGE OF KASABA
HOBLI AND CHECK DAM CAUSE WAY NEAR ALENA HALLI
,VADAGARAHALLI LINGAPURA OF GANDASI HOBLI, ARASIKERE
TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT
Calculation of the normal depth of scour as per IRC-SP13 by using Lacey's Formula.

0.473(Q)1/3
D=
(Ksf)1/3 Here, Ksf= 1.2 Coarse sand
Q = 54.91 cumecs

Depth of Scour D = 1.692

Say D= 1.70 m

IS 6966 ( Part 1 ) : 1989

Depth of Upstream Cut-off Wall:
Upstream Scour depth is taken as 1.5 times the normal Scour depth from High Flood level
Here,
Depth of normal Scour D = 1.70
Therefore 1.5X D = 2.55
Depth of Upstream Cut-off Wall=( Sill Level-( HFL-1.5 x scour depth))
Sill level = 899.60 m
HFL = 901.500 m
Depth of Upstream Cut-off Wall (d1) = 0.65
However provide = 0.00 m
U/s Cut-off Wall = 0.00 m
However provide 0.6m thick cut off wall of 0.00 m depth on upstream side
RL of U/s cut off wall = Sill Level - Depth of U/s cutoff wall
= 899.600 m

Depth of Downstream cut-off wall

Downstream Scour depth is taken as 2 times the normal Scour depth from High Flood level
Here,
Depth of Scour D = 1.70
Therefore 2 x D = 3.40
Depth of Downstream Cut-off wall= (Sill Level- (HFL-2 x Scour Depth))
Sill level = 899.60 m
HFL = 901.50 m
Depth of Downstream Cut-off Wall (d2) = 1.50
say = 1.50 m
D/s Cut-off Wall = 1.50 m 1.50 m
However provide 0.6m thick cut off wall of 1.50 m depth on downstream side
RL of D/s cut off wall = Sill Level - Depth of D/s cutoff wall
= 898.10 m

Key wall Length = 5xh

5.000
Provide 2.5m long key wall on both left bank & right bank as per site condition.
 DESIGN OF APRON
Calculation of creep length as per Bligh's Creep Theory for Seepage Flow.

Safety Against Piping or Undermining Creep length L= C x HL

Where,
C = Blighs Creep Co-cflicient.
C = Bligh's Creep Co-cflicient.
( C = 5 to 9 for Boulders, Gravel and Sand mixed ) Say= 7
HL = Maximum Head Loss = FRL - Sill Level i.e= 1.00 m

Length of creep = 7 x 1.000

Total creep length L = 7.00 m

Length of downstream side impervious apron/ Stilling basin:

L1= 2.21 x C ((HL/13)(1/2)
L1 = 4.29
Say L1 = 4.50 m
Downstream apron= 4.50 m
L = 7.00 m
L1 = 4.50 m
Width of body wall b = 5.500 m as per design.
d1 = 1.50 m
Actual Creep
L1 = 4.50 m
Width of body wall b = 5.500 m
d1 = 1.50 m
Actual Creep = (2 xd1)+ L1+b+L2
Actual Creep = 13.00 m > 7.00 m
 Safe against minimum Creep Length ,Hence ok.

Check - Safety against piping

i.e HL/L is less than or equal to 1/C.

HL/L = 1.00 / 13.00 0.077 L= actual creep length

1/C = 1 / 7.00 0.143
The safety against piping ,Hence safe.

Check by khosla's theory

b= 10.00 m
d2 = 1.50 m
α = b/d2 = 6.67 m
λ= (1+√1+α2)/(2)
λ= 3.871

Exit gradient = Hs/d2 x (1/π√λ)

Height of storage Hs = 1.00 m
d2 = 1.50 m
π= 3.142
λ= 3.871
Exit gradient = 0.11
Permissible exit gradient for Coarse sand = 0. 20 to 0.167

Type of Soil Safe exit gradient

Shingle 1/4 to 1/5 (0.25 to 0.20)
Coarse Sand 1/5 to 1/6 (0.20 to 0.17)
Fine Sand 1/6 to 1/7 (0.17 to 0.14)

The exit gradient is within the permisible exit gradient for coarse sand ,Hence safe.
No. of vents provided 2 units of 4.00m clear span and 0.60 m thick main pier .