Scribd
Upload
14 views4 pages

Eapp

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating reaction papers on the movie GomBurZa, detailing criteria such as introduction, summary, analysis, personal response, impact, conclusion, organization, and grammar. Each criterion is graded on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with specific descriptions of what constitutes each level of performance. The rubric emphasizes the importance of clarity, detail, and engagement in the student's writing.

Uploaded by

jaytzy200m
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
14 views4 pages

Eapp

The document outlines a rubric for evaluating reaction papers on the movie GomBurZa, detailing criteria such as introduction, summary, analysis, personal response, impact, conclusion, organization, and grammar. Each criterion is graded on a scale from excellent to needs improvement, with specific descriptions of what constitutes each level of performance. The rubric emphasizes the importance of clarity, detail, and engagement in the student's writing.

Uploaded by

jaytzy200m
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Rubrics guide for Reaction Paper in the movie entitled GomBurZa

Criteria Excellent (100) Good (90) Satisfactory (85)

Provides a thorough Provides a good Introduction is present


introduction with context introduction with context but lacks context or
Introduction
and clear purpose; and purpose; somewhat purpose; minimally
engages the reader. engaging. engaging.

Provides a detailed and


Provides a good summary Summary is present but
accurate summary of the
Summary with minor inaccuracies lacks detail or has
movie's plot and key
or lacks some detail. notable inaccuracies.
themes.
Thoroughly evaluates the
Good evaluation with
effectiveness of the Evaluation is present but
some evidence;
movie's message, lacks depth or evidence;
Analysis addresses message,
themes, and use of addresses some
themes, and cinematic
cinematic techniques elements.
techniques.
with strong evidence.
Clearly articulates a
Articulates a personal Personal response is
personal response to the
Personal response with some present but lacks
movie, supported by
Response specific examples and specificity or depth of
specific examples and
reflections. reflection.
reflections.

Clearly discusses the Impact discussion is


Discusses the movie's
movie's impact on the present but lacks clarity
impact with some clarity;
audience and its or completeness;
Impact mentions relevance to
relevance to historical mentions relevance to
historical and
and contemporary historical and
contemporary issues.
issues. contemporary issues.

Summarizes key points Summarizes key points; Conclusion is present


effectively; offers a clear offers a somewhat clear but lacks clarity or
Conclusion
and well-supported and supported personal support for personal
personal opinion. opinion. opinion.

Generally well-organized Organization is present


Well-organized with clear
with some transitions; but somewhat
Organization transitions; follows a
mostly follows a logical confusing; lacks clear
logical structure.
structure. transitions.
Uses proper grammar, Some errors in grammar,
Minor errors in grammar,
spelling, and spelling, or punctuation;
Grammar spelling, or punctuation;
punctuation; has a writing style is
and Style writing style is clear but
mature, engaging writing somewhat unclear or
less engaging.
style. unengaging.
d GomBurZa

Needs Improvement (80)

Introduction is vague or
missing; does not engage
the reader.

Summary is missing or
inaccurate.

Evaluation is vague or
missing; little to no
evidence provided.

Personal response is
vague or missing; little to
no specific examples
provided.

Impact discussion is
vague or missing; does
not mention relevance to
historical and
contemporary issues.

Conclusion is vague or
missing; personal opinion
is unclear or
unsupported.

Organization is confusing
or missing; lacks clear
transitions.
Numerous errors in
grammar, spelling, or
punctuation; writing style
is unclear or unengaging.

You might also like