Economic Development and Environmental Impact
Economic Development and Environmental Impact
By
Tammy
Zeng
Completed
Spring
2012
University
Honors
in
International
Relations
Capstone
Advisor:
John
Zhao,
School
of
International
Service
1
Content
Cover
Page…………………………………………………………………………………………………......…
1
Content……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...2
Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..3
Theoretical
Approach…………………………………………………………………………………………4
Introduction
………………………………………………………………………………………………………5
Research
Question………………………………………………………………………………………………7
Map
of
Paper………………………………………………………………………………………………………9
Part
1:
Economic
Development
and
Environmental
Pollution…………………………...….10
Part
2:
Environmental
Pollution
and
Health
Effects……………………………………………..14
Part
3:
Pollution
Related
Disputes
and
CCP
reactions…………………………………………..17
Part
4:
Adaptation
Model
and
Analysis………………………………………………………………..22
Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………25
Works
Cited………………………………………………………………………………………………………26
2
Abstract
In
just
30
years,
China
has
evolved
through
a
process
of
economic
development
that
continues
to
be
unrivaled
by
the
rest
of
the
world.
Since
Deng
Xiao
Peng’s
Open
Door
Policy,
China
has
reached
an
average
annual
GDP
growth
rate
of
10%
and
has
lifted
billions
of
people
out
of
poverty
because
of
it.
However
economic
progress
also
came
with
heavy
costs
for
the
environment.
For
example
in
Hong
Kong
alone,
air
pollution
caused
an
average
of
30,000
deaths
per
year
(Wong).
The
effects
of
air
pollution
and
other
health
hazards
related
to
economic
development
have
a
disproportionately
larger
effect
on
people
of
lower
socio-‐economic
status.
The
marginalized
poor
of
China
suffer
from
the
negative
externalities
that
come
with
development
but
reap
very
little
of
the
benefits.
These
issues
have
come
to
complement
economic
development
and
in
many
ways
have
caused
social
unrest
and
political
instability
in
many
regions
throughout
China.
Disruptive
actions
such
as
protests
have
increased
tenfold
since
1994
from
8,700
to
87,000
in
2005(Storey).
Even
with
economic
growth,
the
Chinese
appear
to
be
dissatisfied
with
the
Communist
Party,
and
reactions
towards
protests
and
demonstrations
have
been
mixed
at
best.
Using
a
qualitative
approach,
the
focus
of
my
research
capstone
is
to
analyze
whether
irresponsible
economic
development
shown
through
environmental
pollution
can
cause
political
instability
and
the
role
of
the
Chinese
government
in
response
to
citizens’
concerns.
My
analysis
using
the
adaptation
theory
shows
that
the
Communist
Party
is
capable
of
adapting
its
role
in
order
to
meet
the
needs
of
its
people.
3
Theoretical
Approach:
The
Adaptation
Model
The
roots
of
the
adaption
model
stems
from
adaption
theory.
This
theory
was
originally
coined
by
Charles
Darwin,
and
encompasses
the
idea
of
the
“survival
of
the
fittest”.
By
applying
this
theory
to
mammal
species,
Charles
Darwin
discovered
the
process
of
scientific
evolution.
He
found
that
organisms
have
an
ability
to
adapt
to
changes
in
its
environment
and
adjust
over
time
to
survive
so
that
each
generation
is
better
suited
to
their
environment.
In
relation
to
China,
the
adaptation
theory
states
that
the
survival
and
the
legitimacy
of
the
Chinese
Communist
Party
is
dependent
on
its
ability
to
adapt
and
respond
to
challenges.
Historically,
China’s
revolution
played
a
large
part
in
influencing
a
guerilla
style
policy-‐making
approach
and
this
adaptive
approach
has
continued
to
frame
the
way
policy
decisions
are
made
today.
Heilmann
and
Perry
characterize
the
guerrilla
policy
style
that
allows
for
adaptive
governance
in
their
chapter
Embracing
Uncertainty.
This
means
that
policy-‐making
is
kept
fluid
allowing
for
continual
improvisations,
adjustments,
and
pilot
efforts
that
take
into
account
practical
experience.
Meanwhile,
strategic
decisions
are
made
through
top
leadership
while
operationalization
and
implementation
are
left
for
local
governments
to
take
into
account.
This
fluid
policy
style
allows
for
the
Chinese
government
to
adapt
to
different
challenges.
According
to
Hellman
and
Perry,
the
succession
of
post
Mao
leaders
have
managed
to
fashion
a
surprisingly
adaptive
pattern
of
authoritarian
rule
capable
so
far
of
withstanding
challenges,
including
growing
social
and
spatial
inequalities.
(Heilmann
and
Perry).
Therefore
my
theoretical
approach
is
to
analyze
whether
the
challenges
of
sustainable
development
is
something
that
the
CCP
is
capable
of
adapting
to.
4
Introduction
When
I
was
growing
up,
we
didn’t
have
luxuries
like
televisions
or
Wii
sets.
We
didn’t
celebrate
birthdays
like
kids
do
here.
I
remember
when
I
was
young;
we
would
be
lucky
to
get
an
egg
every
year
for
Chinese
New
Year.
We
didn’t
even
have
shoes,
let
alone
brand
name
Nikes.
This
was
the
picture
that
my
mother
had
painted
for
me
of
China
as
a
young
girl.
People
had
rationed
their
foods
and
even
with
frugal
spending
habits,
few
families
were
able
to
meet
their
basic
needs.
Last
year
when
I
visited
China,
the
vivid
image
my
mother
instilled
in
me
of
immense
poverty
with
dirt
floors
and
bare
feet
simply
seemed
inaccurate.
As
I
walked
through
the
streets
of
Beijing
I
was
constantly
surrounded
by
the
incessant
noise
of
bustling
cars,
busy
street
vendors,
and
the
endless
blocks
of
department
stores.
In
just
30
years,
China
had
evolved
through
a
process
of
economic
development
that
continues
to
be
unrivaled
by
the
rest
of
the
world,
and
this
process
of
development
was
easily
visible
throughout
the
streets
of
China.
With
the
start
of
the
Open
Door
Policy
by
Premier
Deng
XiaoPeng,
China
was
able
to
reach
an
average
annual
GDP
growth
rate
of
10%
for
the
past
thirty
years.
China
started
to
adopt
market
forces,
which
corrected
many
of
the
inefficiencies
around
allocation
and
distribution.
China
also
started
to
encourage
international
trade,
which
led
to
economic
growth
through
comparative
advantage.
The
process
of
implementing
market
liberalization
and
privatization
policies
allowed
for
gradual
economic
development,
which
ultimately
lifted
billions
of
Chinese
people
out
of
poverty.
However,
this
economic
development
also
caused
contention
within
China.
Economic
progress
also
came
with
its
drawbacks
such
as
environmental
pollution
and
income
disparities.
The
issue
of
air
pollution
in
China
is
a
large
concern
due
to
the
increasing
number
of
mortality
rates
related
to
air
pollution.
In
Hong
Kong
alone,
air
pollution
caused
an
average
of
30,000
deaths
per
year
(Wong).
The
effects
of
air
pollution
and
other
health
hazards
related
to
economic
development
have
a
disproportionately
larger
effect
on
people
of
lower
socio-‐economic
status.
The
marginalized
poor
of
China
suffer
from
the
negative
externalities
that
come
with
development
but
reap
very
little
of
the
benefits.
These
issues
have
come
to
5
complement
economic
development
and
in
many
ways
have
caused
social
unrest
and
political
instability
in
many
regions
throughout
China.
Disruptive
actions
such
as
protests
have
increased
tenfold
since
1994
from
8,700
to
87,000
in
2005.
(Storey)
Even
with
economic
growth,
the
Chinese
appear
to
be
dissatisfied
with
the
Communist
Party,
and
reactions
towards
protests
and
demonstrations
have
been
mixed
at
best.
I
plan
to
analyze
whether
or
not
irresponsible
economic
development
shown
through
environmental
pollution
can
cause
political
instability.
I
hypothesize
that
there
is
a
strong
correlation
between
environmental
pollution
and
economic
development
and
this
has
made
China
more
politically
unstable.
I
also
explore
how
the
Chinese
government
has
responded
to
the
environmental
disputes,
and
why
there
continues
to
be
incongruences
between
policy
and
enforcement.
6
Research
Question
or
Puzzle
Many
questions
remained
unanswered
after
coming
back
from
by
study
abroad
experience
in
China.
My
internship
with
the
Economic
Observer,
a
newspaper
focusing
on
the
Chinese
Economy
gave
me
a
realization
of
the
many
social
ills
within
China
and
left
me
with
questions
that
continued
to
spur
my
curiosity.
These
issues
included
the
income
gap,
the
houkou
system,
cancer
villages,
drought,
unemployment,
social
security,
the
Jasmine
Revolution,
air
pollution
and
so
on.
After
analyzing
all
of
these
issues,
economic
development
seemed
to
be
a
common
link.
China
is
constantly
being
applauded
for
the
their
economic
development
but
the
problems
that
stem
from
economic
development
don’t
seem
to
gain
as
much
attention.
On
a
surface
level,
I
noticed
the
web
of
connections.
A
progression
towards
a
free
market
system
inevitably
causes
inequalities
in
terms
of
distribution
leading
to
income
gaps.
Economic
development
without
environmental
regulation
causes
air
pollution
leading
to
cancer
villages.
The
hokou
system,
which
restricts
migration,
paired
with
regional
disparities
leads
a
large
number
of
migrants
without
social
security.
Economic
development
also
allowed
for
improved
living
standards
and
higher
educational
attainment,
but
the
supply
of
jobs
for
college
graduates
did
not
necessarily
meet
the
demand
for
them.
These
issues
would
surface
but
political
discourse
still
seemed
limited
because
criticism
was
not
received
well
by
the
Chinese
Communist
Party.
Daily
reports
of
missing
dissidents
often
times
made
the
news,
and
even
popular
figures
like
Ai
Wei
Wei
would
go
missing.
My
snapshot
of
China
inspired
my
capstone
project
to
reflect
how
irresponsible
economic
development
might
cause
political
instability.
Originally,
I
had
planned
to
measure
the
effects
of
economic
development
through
income
gaps,
environmental
degradation,
and
regional
disparity
to
encompass
many
of
the
issues
that
I
felt
might
cause
political
instability.
After
realizing
that
the
scope
of
this
paper
would
simply
be
too
large,
I
decided
to
narrow
down
my
research
question
and
decided
to
focus
on
environmental
pollution.
I
then
realized
that
linking
environmental
pollution
with
political
instability
would
lead
to
a
host
of
questions
and
necessary
causalities.
For
example,
is
there
a
7
connection
between
economic
development
and
environmental
pollution
in
the
case
of
China?
What
are
the
health
effects
associated
with
environmental
pollution
and
if
so
who
are
impacted
by
it?
If
environmental
pollution
in
fact
associated
with
economic
development
and
this
has
proceeded
on
for
over
30
decades,
what
has
the
response
been?
What
has
the
government
done
to
address
the
problems
if
at
all?
I
make
the
assumption
that
economic
development
is
associated
with
environmental
pollution
and
focus
primarily
on
the
effects
of
environmental
pollution
and
its
impact
on
political
instability.
Therefore
my
research
question
is:
Do
the
effects
of
environmental
pollution
cause
political
instability
in
China?
8
Establishment
of
Causal
Relationships
in
Developing
Paper
Thesis:
When
Economic
Development
occurs
irresponsibly,
this
causes
political
instability
Part
I
:
Economic
Development
Causes
Environmental
Pollution
Part
II:
Environmental
Pollution
causes
negative
health
effects
and
this
disproportionately
affects
people
of
poverty
Part
III:
Knowledge
of
environmental
pollution
and
its
impacts
cause
commotion
among
citizens.
With
out
the
proper
form
of
political
discourse
this
result
to
protest.
Part
IV:
CCP
tries
to
adapt
to
the
needs
of
the
people
by
making
short
term
policies
to
gain
the
support
of
the
populace
but
may
not
necessarily
be
effective
in
enforcing
those
polices.
The
Chinese
government
continues
forward,
as
shown
through
the
adaptation
model.
9
Part
I:
Economic
Development
and
Environmental
Pollution
As
economic
development
progresses
the
production
capacity
and
living
standards
for
people
improve,
leading
to
a
higher
demand
for
energy.
This
process
of
industrialization
isn’t
any
different
from
that
of
other
countries,
where
the
environment
is
often
sacrificed
in
order
to
pave
way
for
economic
development.
For
the
US,
this
period
started
during
the
late
19th
century
and
for
China
this
process
was
marked
by
the
Open
Door
Policy
in
1978.
In
China
this
period
of
growth
and
industrialization
has
lasted
for
the
past
three
decades
and
has
started
to
leave
its
ecological
mark.
Today,
China’s
environment
is
struggling
to
support
its’
large
and
continually
growing
population
and
its’
constant
demand
for
energy.
Economic
development
correlates
with
environmental
pollution
due
to
the
increasing
demand
for
energy
and
the
heavy
use
of
coal
and
oil
in
order
to
satisfy
those
energy
needs.
While
economic
progress
in
China
has
been
successful
in
lifting
the
largest
number
of
people
out
of
poverty
in
the
past
decade,
China
has
also
grown
to
have
higher
living
standards
for
its
people.
This
has
been
apparent
through
the
transportation
industry.
While
30
years
ago,
most
people
could
barely
afford
bicycles,
the
middle-‐upper
class
in
China
today
often
own
a
car.
This
growing
trend
is
shown
through
Yuefe
Jin’s
analysis
of
automobiles
and
energy
conservation
in
China.
“Within
a
period
of
10
years,
China’s
automobile
output
rose
rapidly
from
500,000
in
1990
to
3.25
million
in
2002,
with
an
average
annual
growth
rate
of
close
to
13%
(Jin).
This
number
has
quadrupled
in
less
than
ten
years.
In
2009,
vehicle
production
reached
13.79
million
and
sales
reached
13.64
million
at
an
increase
of
more
than
45%,
making
China
the
world’s
largest
automobile
market
(Policy
Recommendations for Supporting the Development of Low Carbon Automotive Fuels in
China).
The
standards
of
living
of
Chinese
citizens
are
increasing,
and
the
effects
are
shown
through
their
material
consumption.
The
energy
needs
necessary
to
satisfy
these
demands
however
are
enormous.
This
rapid
increase
in
the
demand
for
automobiles
has
implications
for
the
use
of
energy,
oil
consumption,
and
green
house
gas
emissions.
The
increasing
demand
for
automobiles
means
a
growing
demand
for
oil.
According
to
the
International
Energy
Agency
(IEA)
the
growth
in
automobile
demands
means
that
10
automotive
energy
consumption
will
increase;
and
by
2030
China’s
automobile
energy
consumption
is
likely
to
surpass
400
Mt
of
fossil
fuels
(Policy
Recommendations).
Currently,
95%
of
China’s
automotive
fuels
are
fossil-‐sourced
gasoline
and
diesel
and
the
demand
for
oil
is
constantly
rising
as
shown
below
(Policy
Recommendations).
By
2020
transportation
is
expected
to
consume
over
25%
of
China’s
total
energy,
and
imported
oil
will
occupy
60%
of
China’s
total
oil
consumption
(Yang).
The
use
of
fossil
fuels
as
a
source
of
energy
is
increasing
at
a
rapid
rate,
which
causes
negative
implications
for
the
environment.
The
increasing
demand
for
oil
means
increasing
the
output
of
green
house
gas
emissions
through
carbon
dioxide.
In
2009,
GHG
emissions
caused
from
the
consumption
of
automotive
fuels
in
China
amounted
480
million
tons
of
CO2
emissions,
an
increase
of
80%
from
2000(Policy
Recommendations).
11
The
increased
living
standards
associated
with
economic
development
have
meant
a
higher
demand
for
material
goods,
and
this
growth
has
been
represented
through
the
increasing
demand
for
automobiles
in
China.
Yet
as
automobile
demand
increases,
so
does
the
demand
for
oil,
which
leads
to
increased
carbon
dioxide
emissions.
Economic
development
therefore
does
have
a
negative
effect
towards
the
environment;
this
is
also
shown
through
the
use
of
coal
as
a
source
of
energy.
China’s
economic
development
has
meant
a
surge
in
energy
needs
and
coal
has
been
China’s
predominant
source
of
energy
for
the
last
30
years.
The
use
of
coal
is
popular
in
China
due
to
its
relatively
cheap
market
price
and
its
large
supply.
In
a
competitive
market
the
cheapest
resources
win
the
largest
market
share
(Yang,
6),
and
for
China
the
large-‐scale
use
of
coal
has
helped
to
fuel
China’s
growing
economy.
The
break
down
of
energy
use
in
2008
according
to
the
US
Energy
Information
Administration
showed
that
coal
made
up
71%
of
total
energy
consumption,
oil
made
up
19%,
hydroelectric
power
made
up
6%
and
natural
gas
made
up
3%(US
EIA).
Therefore,
China’s
major
source
of
energy
is
coal.
In
2009,
China
consumed
an
estimated
3.5
billion
tons
of
coal,
which
made
up
46
percent
of
the
world
total
(US
EIA).
12
Coal
use
is
also
a
popular
in
China
because
it
is
a
relatively
abundant
natural
resource
within
China.
China
has
the
third
largest
coal
reserves
in
the
world
and
since
1989,
China
was
ranked
first
in
its
total
production
of
coal
(Thompson).
Since
the
Chinese
people
rely
heavily
on
the
use
of
coal,
the
government
has
been
actively
supporting
the
coal
industry.
According
to
the
12th
Five
Year
Plan,
the
Chinese
government
plans
to
consolidate
the
coal
sector
in
order
to
fully
utilize
the
coal
resources
within
China
(US
EIA).
China
is
slowly
increasing
its
production
and
consumption
of
coal
and
although
the
market
price
of
coal
is
inexpensive,
the
costs
associated
with
coal
use
to
public
health
and
the
environment
is
extremely
high.
The
effects
of
coal
can
be
measured
through
air
pollution
by
looking
at
levels
of
carbon
dioxide,
sulfur
dioxide,
and
nitrogen
oxide.
According
to
the
a
National
Energy
and
Strategy
Policy
Report
in
2004,
the
burning
of
coal
accounts
for
70%
of
CO2
emissions,
90%
of
sulfur
dioxide
emissions,
and
67%
of
nitrogen
oxide
emissions
(Grumbine).
By
2020,
SO2
levels
are
projected
to
increase
by
150%
beyond
what
Chinese
experts
describe
as
the
maximum
capacity
for
the
entire
country
(Grumbine),
and
for
NO2,
projections
to
2020
are
expected
to
increase
by
86%
(Grumbine).
These
numbers
show
that
the
increasing
levels
of
air
pollution
will
likely
cause
the
acidification
of
the
land,
and
will
result
in
negative
ecological
impacts.
The
connection
between
economic
development
and
environmental
pollution
are
apparent
through
the
increasing
levels
of
emissions.
This
is
caused
both
by
the
increasing
level
of
industrial
output
and
rising
living
standards.
More
energy
is
constantly
needed
to
satisfy
the
growing
economy
and
this
often
comes
at
the
cost
of
the
environment.
13
Part
II:
Environmental
pollution
and
Negative
Health
Effects
Economic
development
causes
increasing
energy
demands,
and
in
China
most
of
those
demands
have
been
met
through
the
use
of
coal
and
gas.
Therefore,
my
analysis
of
health
effects
associated
with
environmental
pollution
focus
primarily
on
air
pollution.
Air
pollution
is
generally
measured
by
the
level
of
particulate
matter
in
the
air.
Particulate
matter
is
the
amount
of
dust,
soot,
dirt
smoke,
or
liquid
droplets
in
the
air
that
are
suspended
in
the
air
for
long
periods
of
time
(EPA).
Particulate
matter
in
the
air
is
formed
when
gases
from
burning
fuels
react
with
sunlight
and
water
vapor
(EPA).
Fuel
combustion,
power
plants,
and
industrial
processes
are
the
main
causes
of
particulate
matter
in
the
air.
Air
particulate
matter
is
measured
by
the
diameter
of
the
particles
in
the
air,
which
range
from
2.5
micrometers
to
10
micrometers.
These
small
particles
are
inhaled
from
the
air
and
can
settle
within
the
lungs,
which
can
lead
to
dangerous
health
effects
ranging
from
respiratory
issues
to
cardiovascular
disease.
Air
pollution
in
China
is
becoming
a
growing
concern
due
to
the
heavy
use
of
coal.
As
previously
stated,
the
burning
of
coal
accounts
for
70%
of
CO2
emissions,
90%
of
sulfur
dioxide
emissions,
and
67%
of
nitrogen
oxide
emissions
in
China
(Grumbine).
The
chemicals
that
are
emitted
from
the
burning
of
fossil
fuels
cause
air
pollution.
As
the
use
of
fossil
fuels
increase,
the
level
of
air
pollution
associated
with
it
also
increases.
In
2003,
over
50%
of
China’s
urban
population
was
exposed
to
annual
average
PM
level
in
excess
of
100
ug/m3,
which
is
twice
the
US
standard.
The
increasing
amount
of
particulate
matter
settling
into
the
air
has
led
to
negative
health
effects.
Several
studies
have
been
conducted
measuring
the
correlation
between
air
pollution
and
health
effects
in
China.
Two
popular
studies
include
the
study
conducted
by
Maureen
Cooper
in
2010
and
the
study
conducted
by
Aunan
and
Pan
in
2004.
In
the
article
What
are
the
Human
Affects
of
Air
Pollution
in
China,
by
Maureen
Cooper,
she
measures
the
affect
of
air
pollution
through
levels
of
morbidity
attributable
to
air
pollution.
Cooper’s
findings
show
that
a
per
10
ug/m3
increase
in
additional
PM
10
levels
causes
a
0.7
%
increase
in
hospital
admissions
due
to
14
cardiovascular
disease,
and
a
1.2
%
increase
in
hospital
admissions
because
of
respiratory
diseases
(Cooper).
In
the
study
produced
by
Aunan
and
Pan
in
2004,
entitled
Exposure
Response
Functions
for
Health
Effects
of
Ambient
Air
Pollution,
they
found
that
a
per
10
ug/m3
increase
in
exposure
to
PM10
can
cause
a
4.8%
increase
in
chronic
bronchitis.
In
2003,
450,000
hospital
admissions
were
associated
with
respiratory
diseases,
while
300,000
hospital
admissions
were
associated
with
chronic
bronchitis
(Aunan
and
Pan).
These
health
effects
were
also
modeled
using
levels
of
sulfur
dioxide
as
a
measure.
The
emission
of
sulfur
dioxide
is
primarily
caused
by
the
use
of
coal
in
China,
meaning
that
there
is
a
direct
causal
relationship
between
energy
use
in
China
and
health
affects.
According
to
the
Aunan
and
Pan
study,
hospital
admissions
due
to
cardiovascular
disease
increased
by
0.19%
per
10
ug/m3
increase
in
the
output
of
sulfur
dioxide
(Aunan
and
Pan).
Health
affects
range
from
cardiovascular
and
respiratory
diseases
to
morbidity.
In
2003,
estimated
deaths
associated
with
outdoor
air
pollution
exceeded
400,000
(Cooper).
The
cost
benefit
analysis
of
economic
development
and
energy
use
should
be
looked
into
more
seriously
as
the
heavy
use
of
fossil
fuels
come
at
heavy
costs
to
society.
Everyday,
Chinese
citizens
are
sacrificing
their
health
due
to
out-‐door
air
pollution.
The
health
effects
associated
with
outdoor
air
pollution
are
apparent
yet
the
effects
of
air
pollution
are
often
times
more
severe
for
those
of
a
lower
socioeconomic
status.
While
the
level
of
poverty
has
gradually
been
reduced,
the
income
gap
within
China
has
increased
over
time.
Health
affects
associated
with
air
pollution
disproportionately
affects
those
of
poor
socioeconomic
status.
With
an
income
distribution
that
is
growing
increasingly
more
spread
out,
the
health
effects
associated
with
poverty
are
becoming
more
apparent.
In
2008,
Wong,
Chun
and
King
conducted
a
study
to
measure
the
effects
of
air
pollution
in
regards
to
socioeconomic
status
in
Hong
Kong,
China.
Social
deprivation
was
measured
through
the
use
of
six
variables;
they
included
unemployment,
monthly
household
income
<$250,
no
schooling
at
all,
one
person
household,
subtenancy,
and
never
married
status.
The
first
four
variables
refer
to
educational
15
attainment
and
material
wealth,
and
the
never-‐married
status
is
included
due
to
the
stigma
associated
with
singles.
The
classification
was
done
in
209
urban
tertiary
planning
units
within
Hong
Kong
and
the
groups
were
separated
between
low
middle
or
high
in
the
Social
Deprivation
Index(SDI).
The
study
showed
that
the
number
of
deaths
associated
with
sulfur
dioxide
air
pollution
was
higher
in
high
SDI
areas
as
opposed
as
opposed
to
low
SDI
areas.
The
study
also
showed
that
cardiovascular
disease
associated
with
levels
of
nitrogen
dioxide
(NO2)
was
more
common
for
those
with
a
high
SDI
index
as
opposed
to
a
low
SDI
index.
Another
study
produced
by
Niedell
in
2004
measured
the
effects
of
carbon
emissions
and
found
that
high
exposure
to
carbon
monoxide
was
found
to
have
a
larger
effect
on
children
from
a
lower
socioeconomic
background
(Niedell).
The
studies
produced
by
Wong,
Chun,
and
King
and
Niedell
show
that
there
is
a
strong
correlation
between
socioeconomic
status
and
health
effects.
There
are
several
possible
explanations
for
this
effect.
For
example,
those
that
have
a
lower
income
most
likely
have
limited
access
to
healthcare
and
poorer
nutrition.
Therefore,
people
of
a
lower
socioeconomic
status
often
times
face
higher
risks
associated
with
the
negative
impacts
of
air
pollution.
16
Part
III:
Pollution
Related
Disputes
and
CCP
reactions
As
the
economy
has
progressed,
the
levels
of
pollutants
in
the
air
have
also
increased
leading
to
larger
health
concerns.
Governments
are
generally
responsible
for
the
negative
externalities
associated
with
economic
development,
and
when
they
fail
to
act
responsibly
this
can
lead
to
social
unrest.
In
China,
environmental
disputes
are
becoming
more
and
more
common,
as
people
are
becoming
more
informed
of
the
effects
of
environmental
pollution.
Since
1997,
the
number
of
pollution
related
disputes
have
increased
annually
by
a
rate
of
25%
(He).
The
levels
of
protests
and
conflicts
related
to
pollution
in
the
21st
century
have
also
increased
dramatically.
Between
2001
and
2005,
the
annual
numbers
of
pollution
related
disputes
were
56,000,
71,000,
62,000,
51,000
and
12,800
respectively
(He).
Protests
have
increased
steadily
as
citizens
are
gaining
more
knowledge
of
the
negative
effects
of
pollution
and
its
relation
to
their
environment.
In
response
the
CCP
tries
to
adapt
to
the
needs
of
the
people,
however,
barriers
involve
the
lack
of
political
discourse
and
the
intermingling
between
economic
goals
and
environmental
impact.
General
awareness
and
knowledge
of
environmental
impacts
through
personal
experience,
advocacy,
and
state
media
spurs
citizens
into
action
to
combat
issues
related
to
environmental
pollution.
Disputes
or
drastic
protests
begin
only
when
citizens
feel
that
their
personal
well
being
and
basic
rights
are
being
sacrificed.
This
was
shown
in
the
case
study
produced
by
Jun
Jing
entitled
“Environmental
Protests
in
Rural
China”.
This
case
study
involved
3,600
residents
from
Dachuan
village
and
their
efforts
in
combating
water
pollution
in
their
community.
In
the
early
1970s,
the
fertilizer
factory
that
was
built
in
the
village
produced
waste-‐water
which
was
dumped
into
the
Yellow
River.
The
stream
leading
to
the
Yellow
River
was
the
only
source
of
water
for
the
villagers
and
as
the
years
passed,
citizens
started
to
notice
the
health
effects
associated
with
consuming
polluted
water.
In
1970,
three
horses
and
30
sheep
went
blind
from
drinking
the
water,
yet
the
complaints
to
the
factory
yielded
minimal
results.
Then
in
the
1980s,
the
water
was
so
polluted
with
ammonia,
that
the
crop
yields
were
being
damaged.
At
this
point,
the
water
pollution
was
becoming
a
direct
threat
to
the
economic
well
being
of
17
many
of
the
agricultural
farmers
in
the
area.
The
minimal
cooperation
shown
by
the
factory
led
to
protests
in
1981
and
after
a
day
cadres
gave
in
and
started
to
supply
a
source
of
tap
water
in
the
central
region
of
Dachuan.
Then
by
the
mid
1980s
around
the
time
of
the
One
Child
Policy,
families
started
to
notice
birth
defects,
and
this
became
a
serious
concern
for
every
family
and
protests
resumed
with
even
more
fervor.
At
each
stage
of
protest,
villagers
learned
the
personal
impacts
that
water
pollution
can
have
and
after
exhausting
the
proper
channels
of
communication,
villagers
were
left
to
protest.
Access
to
information
and
environmental
awareness
was
also
what
instigated
the
closure
of
factories
in
Futian,
in
the
Sichuan
Province.
In
this
case
study
produced
by
Tilt
and
Xiao,
entitled
“Industry
Pollution
and
Environmental
Enforcement”,
environmental
awareness
came
through
the
outlets
of
social
media.
In
2002,
an
expose
called
“Ten
Minutes
Tonight”
focused
on
the
local
factories
in
Futian
and
the
detrimental
effects
of
pollutants
from
the
factory.
In
this
expose,
a
reporter
with
a
hidden
camera
confronted
the
owner
of
the
factory
about
the
environmental
hazards
of
his
factory.
In
response,
the
owner
simply
boasted
and
said
that
despite
its
obvious
pollution
problems
their
industry
constituted
a
vital
source
of
tax
revenue
and
therefore
was
immune
to
regulation.
Within
just
a
year
the
district
government’s
environmental
protection
group,
Renhe
District
EPB
was
forced
by
national
policy,
citizen
complaints
and
public
scrutiny
to
shut
down
a
large
number
of
factories
in
Futian
for
noncompliance
with
emission
standards
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
Another
key
reason
the
number
of
environmental
protests
have
been
rising
is
because
of
the
lack
of
political
discourse
between
citizens
and
the
government.
In
1997
the
number
of
letters
sent
to
the
People’s
Republic
over
environmental
abuse
amounted
to
100,000.
By
2002
this
number
reached
400,000
and
by
2006
it
was
close
to
600,000
(Jing).
Yet
the
majority
of
these
petition
letters
calling
for
government
action
and
representation
were
simply
ignored.
Of
the
many
letters
that
were
sent
in,
the
court
system
handled
no
more
than
1%
of
the
country’s
environmental
lawsuits
(Jing).
When
environmental
lawsuits
are
rejected
by
the
court
system,
this
leads
to
petition
drives,
and
when
petition
drives
fail
18
demonstrations
and
protests
follow(Jing).
Citizens
are
lacking
the
proper
outlets
to
express
their
concerns
and
when
their
efforts
are
continually
dismissed,
citizens
have
no
other
choice
but
to
protest.
The
main
source
of
political
discourse
between
the
government
and
its
people
is
the
petition
system.
Also
called
xinfang
this
system
was
suppose
to
encourage
political
stability
by
creating
a
means
of
communication.
However,
those
that
petition
often
face
repercussions,
and
are
often
held
responsible
if
they
lead
to
disruption
actions.
Under
the
1994
Beijing
Petition
Regulations,
petitioners
have
clear
regulations
they
must
abide
by
(Storey).
For
example
“Petitioners
will
be
investigated
for
criminal
responsibility
if
they
engage
in
disruptive
action,
damage
property
and
threaten
staff
among
other
activities;
they
will
also
be
subject
to
prosecution
if
they
are
deliberately
provocative
and
incorrigible”(Storey).
Yet
despite
regulations,
the
number
of
petitions
sent
to
the
central
government
is
continually
growing,
while
the
government
response
is
limited.
For
the
most
part
these
petitions
are
ignored.
The
lack
of
discourse
and
the
minimal
means
of
addressing
concerns
lead
to
disruptive
actions.
The
number
of
disruptive
action
in
China
grew
from
8,700
in
1993
to
87,000
in
2005
(Storey).
Many
citizens
are
losing
their
confidence
in
the
structure
of
the
petition
system
as
a
means
of
discourse
and
are
becoming
more
active
in
protests
in
order
to
satisfy
their
demands.
The
Chinese
government
responds
to
the
demands
of
environmental
protection
in
different
manners
due
to
sometimes-‐divergent
goals
between
the
central
government,
district
government,
and
township
government.
The
central
government
sets
more
expansive
policies
and
tries
to
abide
by
international
ideas
around
sustainability.
The
central
government
has
increased
its
efforts
around
environmental
sustainability
by
creating
more
regulatory
agencies,
increasing
regulatory
standards
through
policy
initiatives
and
providing
increased
funding
toward
environmental
protection
projects.
For
example,
the
State
Environmental
Protection
Agency
(SEPA)
since
its
start
in
the
1970s
has
gradually
grown
from
88,000
employees
in
1995
to
over
380,00
employees
in
2006
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
The
level
of
funding
towards
environmental
protection
efforts
has
also
grown
significantly.
Government
statistics
report
that
investment
in
pollution
control
and
19
treatment
grew
from
8.2
billion
yuan
in
1999
to
16.3
billion
yuan
in
2003
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
Now
expenditures
on
environmental
protection
make
up
about
1.4%
of
GDP
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
Both
through
policy
and
funding
the
central
government
has
committed
to
improving
environmental
conditions.
The
support
for
the
necessary
policy
initiatives
is
in
place
and
the
policy
goals
for
sustainable
growth
is
admirable,
however,
policy
goals
are
often
times
not
met
due
to
lack
of
enforcement.
Despite
the
broad
mandates
by
the
central
government,
the
reality
is
that
the
priorities,
projects,
and
implementation
of
environment
regulations
are
actually
the
responsibility
of
the
district
and
local
governments.
The
priorities
of
the
different
levels
of
government
do
not
usually
align.
This
was
the
case
for
the
study
done
in
Futian.
As
noted
earlier
factories
in
this
particular
village
were
shut
down
due
to
the
attention
brought
on
by
the
media.
The
factory
owner
stated
he
had
no
regard
for
environmental
regulations
since
his
industry
essentially
supports
the
economy
of
the
village.
When
the
factories
were
forced
to
shut
down
in
2002,
the
black
and
white
nature
between
economic
development
and
environmental
sustainability
became
apparent.
After
the
shut
down
the
fiscal
situation
in
the
township
plummeted.
Industrial
taxes
declined
form
more
than
2
million
yuan
in
the
late
1990s
to
zero
following
the
factory
closures
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
Prior
to
the
factory
closing,
the
majority
of
the
taxes
were
spent
on
development
projects
in
the
village,
including
investment
in
infrastructure,
healthcare,
and
schooling.
After
the
factory
closures
the
operating
budget
for
development
projects
were
cut
by
two
thirds.
Businesses
within
the
village
also
suffered
heavy
economic
losses.
Half
of
the
retail
stores
that
originally
catered
to
the
factory
workers
and
their
families
were
forced
to
close.
In
this
case
the
level
of
environmental
enforcement
was
detrimental
for
the
community.
This
case
study
showed
that
on
a
local
level,
officials
are
often
less
likely
to
take
on
environmental
protection
measures
very
seriously
as
taxes
often
make
up
a
large
portion
of
local
government
revenue.
The
district
government
generally
plays
the
middle
ground
in
balancing
the
priorities
of
the
central
and
local
governments.
In
the
Futian
case
the
district
government
sided
with
the
central
government
by
strictly
enforcing
the
emission
20
standards
already
in
place.
The
Futian
case
was
more
sensitive
due
to
the
public
scrutiny
caused
by
the
expose,
but
on
a
general
note
the
district
government
is
suppose
to
encourage
sustainable
development
by
balancing
the
goals
of
both
the
central
government
and
the
local
government.
This
can
be
a
hard
task
considering
the
different
priorities
of
each
group.
Overall,
there
has
been
increased
commotion
on
the
subject
of
environmental
protection
because
citizens
are
gaining
a
greater
understanding
of
their
health
and
well-‐being
in
relation
to
the
environment.
Environmental
awareness
has
led
to
greater
demands
for
government
action,
however
the
channels
for
communication
and
political
discourse
are
often
times
ineffective.
In
order
to
avoid
political
instability
there
needs
to
be
an
improved
outlet
for
political
discourse
and
discussion.
Also,
the
different
levels
of
government
need
to
also
cooperate
in
order
to
consolidate
often
times
divergent
goals
in
order
to
promote
sustainable
development.
21
Part
IV:
Adaptation
Model
Analysis
The
adaptation
model
would
assume
that
the
survival
of
the
Communist
Party
is
dependent
on
their
ability
to
adapt
and
respond
to
challenges.
In
my
analysis
I
look
into
how
the
CCP
is
able
to
do
this
through
meeting
the
challenges
of
sustainable
development.
As
the
Chinese
economy
started
to
grow,
many
environmental
conditions
were
over-‐looked
because
economic
growth
was
a
generally
prioritized
over
environmental
pollution.
The
building
of
factories
within
villages
was
considered
a
sign
of
growth
and
industrialization,
and
many
local
governments
encouraged
these
investments.
However,
the
last
two
decades
have
shown
the
negative
externalities
of
pollution
that
are
often
times
accompanied
with
increased
industrial
output.
Environmental
awareness
has
caused
a
growing
number
of
environmental-‐related
disputes
and
protests.
The
matter
in
which
the
CCP
reacts
to
the
above
challenges
is
key
in
measuring
the
party’s
continued
success.
The
central
government,
in
its
efforts
to
quell
social
unrest
in
regards
to
environmental
pollution,
has
put
into
place
a
wide
range
of
policies
and
initiatives
to
encourage
and
incentivize
environmental
protection.
In
1995,
the
CCP
refused
to
spend
even
half
of
the
recommended
1.5%
of
its
GNP
towards
environmental
protection
(Vemeer).
But
by
2003,
the
CCP
close
to
doubled
its
effort
by
spending
16.3
billion
yuan
or
1.4%
of
its
GNP
towards
environmental
sustainability
(Tilt
and
Xiao).
As
the
CCP
is
realizing
the
hazards
related
to
environmental
pollution
and
the
challenges
related
to
them,
the
central
government
is
stepping
up
and
responding
to
the
needs
of
its
people.
Along
with
financial
support,
the
central
government
has
also
been
active
in
creating
more
stringent
environmental
polices
and
have
shown
growing
efforts
in
regulating
those
policies.
SEPA,
the
bureaucracy
focused
primarily
on
advocating
for
environmental
protection
and
regulation
has
also
grown
significantly
in
size.
These
efforts
are
a
positive
sign
of
the
central
government
gradually
adapting
to
some
of
the
environmental
demands
of
its
citizens.
On
a
local
and
district
level
the
goals
and
priorities
are
different.
The
government
structure
in
China
generally
allows
for
more
autonomy
and
22
independent
discretion
on
the
local
level,
therefore
local
cadres
are
more
prone
to
corruption.
This
is
essentially
what
causes
the
weak
and
uneven
enforcement
of
environmental
laws.
In
both
the
Futian
and
Dachuan
disputes,
local
government
failed
to
respond
properly
to
the
demands
of
the
community.
In
the
Futian
case,
the
issue
of
environmental
pollution
could
have
been
addressed
prior
to
the
expose
had
environmental
regulations
been
properly
enforced
earlier.
After
the
media
exposure,
citizens
and
higher
government
officials
vehemently
advocated
for
the
closure
of
the
factories.
If
the
local
government
had
ordered
a
gradual
phase-‐out
of
emissions
prior
to
the
expose,
this
could
have
saved
the
village
from
economic
collapse.
The
failure
of
local
government
is
also
shown
in
the
Dachuan
case.
In
the
Dachuan
disputes,
villagers
had
asked
their
local
government
for
advice
regarding
the
issue
of
water
pollution.
However,
the
local
government
instead
of
cooperating
with
the
citizens
to
find
a
proper
compromise;
they
simply
dismissed
the
issue.
The
local
government,
which
is
suppose
to
advocate
for
the
needs
of
its
citizens
failed
in
its
role.
When
citizens
came
to
protest
it
was
apparent
that
cadres
sided
more
with
the
factory
owners
because
they
themselves
were
receiving
a
portion
of
the
profits.
During
one
of
the
major
protests,
citizens
called
out
the
Communist
Party
Secretary
General
Manager
to
drink
the
polluted
water
that
the
rest
of
the
village
was
forced
to
use.
It
took
close
to
20
years
of
constant
protest
for
the
factory
to
address
the
issue
of
water
pollution.
These
frustrations
could
have
been
alleviated
with
less
tension
had
the
local
government
been
more
prominent
in
its
role
of
environmental
regulation.
One
of
the
failures
of
the
guerilla
style
of
policy
making
is
that
political
accountability
is
sacrificed
by
the
leadership
flexibility
(Heilman
and
Perry).
Also
since
many
institutions
remain
unchecked
by
either
the
media
or
other
bureaucracies,
they
become
more
prone
to
corruption.
Corruption
was
obvious
in
both
cases
regarding
Futian
and
Dachuan.
Since
the
local
EPA
wasn’t
active,
and
the
local
government
sided
with
the
factory
owners,
citizens
did
not
receive
proper
representation
and
the
political
discourse
that
was
necessary
in
communicating
the
priorities
of
the
people
were
ineffective.
Also
the
independence
and
autonomy
that
was
given
to
local
cadres
was
unchecked,
and
without
political
transparency
local
23
cadres
were
able
to
get
away
with
providing
lax
environmental
regulations
to
the
industries
of
their
choosing.
Public
attitudes
also
reflected
the
failure
of
local
government
In
2009,
Tony
Saich’s
created
a
study
using
data
from
the
Horizon
Market
Research
Company
(3,000-‐4,000
respondents)
analyzing
approval
ratings
for
different
branches
of
the
government.
In
his
analysis,
Saich
found
that
95.9
%
of
residents
were
satisfied
with
the
CCP,
80%
of
residents
were
satisfied
with
midlevel
government,
and
only
60%
of
residents
were
satisfied
with
the
local
government.
In
order
to
improve
public
sentiments,
local
government
needs
to
play
a
larger
role
in
addressing
the
concerns
of
its
citizens.
Although
the
CCP
is
adapting
by
encouraging
environmental
sustainability
on
many
fronts,
the
CCP
also
needs
to
consider
“adapting”
to
a
more
transparent
and
representative
political
structure
so
that
the
needs
of
local
residents
are
met.
Overall,
there
is
still
a
strong
amount
of
confidence
and
pride
in
the
Communist
party.
With
approval
ratings
of
95%,
the
central
government
still
retains
a
strong
amount
of
support
(Saich).
And
despite,
the
growing
number
of
protests
there
is
still
a
strong
sense
of
legitimacy
towards
the
central
government.
24
Conclusion:
The
past
30
years
of
economic
development
has
caused
forms
of
social
unrest,
however
the
Chinese
Communist
Party
has
responded
effectively
to
many
of
the
needs
of
its
people.
The
central
government
in
the
past
five
years
has
implemented
more
environmental
regulations
and
created
more
funding
towards
environmental
initiatives.
This
process
is
an
ongoing
one,
but
the
CCP
has
started
to
step
up
in
its
efforts.
Now
China
is
moving
towards
more
sustainable
development
in
order
to
balance
economic
growth,
environmental
concerns,
and
social
harmony.
The
central
government
is
essentially
adapting
to
the
country’s
environmental
concerns.
Moving
forward
China
is
likely
to
adapt
through
processes
of
gradual
change.
25
Works
Cited
Aunan,
K.,
and
XC
Pan.
"Exposure-‐response
Functions
for
Health
Effects
of
Ambient
Air
Pollution
Applicable
for
China
-‐-‐
a
Meta-‐analysis."
National
Center
for
Biotechnology
Information.
U.S.
National
Library
of
Medicine,
15
Aug.
2004.
Web.
15
Apr.
2012.
<http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15262154>.
Cropper,
Maureen.
"What
Are
the
Health
Effects
of
Air
Pollution."
Ed.
G.
M.
Heal.
Is
Economic
Growth
Sustainable?
Houndmills,
Basingstoke,
Hampshire:
Palgrave
Macmillan,
2010.
Print.
"Frequent Questions." EPA. Environmental Protection Agency, 23 Mar. 2012. Web. 15
Apr. 2012. <http://www.epa.gov/airprogm/oar/particles/designations/faq.htm>.
GRUMBINE,
R.
EDWARD.
"China's
Emergence
and
the
Prospects
for
Global
Sustainability."
BioScience
57.3
(2007):
249-‐55.
JSTOR.
BioScience,
Mar.
2007.
Web.
15
Apr.
2012.
<http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.1641/B570308?uid=3739584>.
He, Qinglian. "The Chinese Government Degenerates into a Self-interested Political
Clique." Human Rights in China . Web. 21 Apr. 2012.
<http://www.hrichina.org/content/3821>.
Jin, Yuefu. "Formulation of Passenger Vehicle Limit Standards and Analysis of Energy
Conservation Potentials in China." Efchina.org. Energy Foundation, 15 Nov.
2003. Web. 14 Apr. 2012.
<http://www.efchina.org/csepupfiles/workshop/2006102695218824.57599916005
17.pdf/Briefing_book_031115_EN.pdf>.
Jing, Jun. "Environmental Protests In Rural China." Chinese Society: Change, Conflict,
and Resistance. Ed. Elizabeth J. Perry and Mark Selden. London: Routledge,
2000. 197-212. Print.
McKibbin,
Warwick
J.,
Peter
J.
Wilcoxen,
and
Wing
Thye.
Woo.
"China
Can
Grow
and
Still
Help
Prevent
the
Tragedy
of
the
CO2
Commons."
China's
Dilemma:
Economic
Growth,
the
Environment
and
Climate
Change.
Ed.
Ligang
Song
and
Wing
Thye.
Woo.
[Canberra]:
Anu
E,
2008.
Print.
Neidell, Matthew J. "Air Pollution, Health, and Socioeconomic Status: The Effect of
26
Outdoor Air Quality on Childhood Asthma." Csiss.org. University of Chicago,
Mar. 2003. Web. 16 Apr. 2012. <https://www.csiss.org/events/meetings/spatial-
interactions/files/neidell.pdf>.
Storey, Lacey Bradley. "China's Petition System and It's Effects on Social Stability and
Regime Stability." The Chinese Labyrinth: Exploring China's Model of
Development. Ed. Baogang Guo and He Li. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2012. 159-
85. Print.
Tilt, Brian, and Pichu Xiao. "Industry, Pollution And Environmental Enforcement In
Rural China: Implications For Sustainable Development." Urban Anthropology
and Studies of Cultural Systems and World Economic Development 36.1/2 (2007):
115-43. Jstor.org. JSTOR, 2007. Web. 21 Apr. 2012.
<http://www.jstor.org.proxyau.wrlc.org/stable/pdfplus/40553544.pdf?acceptTC=t
rue&&>.
Vermeer, Edward B. "Industrial Pollution in China and Remedial Policies." The China
Quarterly 156 (1998): 952-85. Jstor.org. Cambridge University Press, Dec. 1998.
Web. 21 Apr. 2012. <http://www.jstor.org.proxyau.wrlc.org/stable/pdf
Wong, Chit-Ming, Chun-Quan Ou, and King-Pan Chan. "The Effects of Air Pollution on
Mortality in Socially Deprived Urban Areas in Hong Kong China."
Environmental Health Perspectives 116.9 (2008): 1189-194. JSTOR. Brogan &
Partners, 2008. Web. 8 Apr. 2012. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/25148408 .>.
27
Yang, Fuqiang. "Launching a Least-Cost Energy Development Path: Overview of the
Leading Sector and Cross-Sector Policies Needed to Maximize Energy Efficiency
and Environmental Performance 2004-2020." Efchina.org. E, 15 Nov. 2003. Web.
14 Apr. 2012.
<http://www.efchina.org/csepupfiles/workshop/2006102695218824.57599916005
17.pdf/Briefing_book_031115_EN.pdf>.
28