The Evolution of Democracy in the 21st Century

Democracy in the 21st century is undergoing significant transformation, marked by both erosion and
renewal. Many countries are witnessing democratic backsliding, where elected leaders undermine
institutional checks and civil liberties while maintaining the façade of democratic rule. This includes
weakening judicial independence, curbing media freedom, and suppressing public dissent. Populist leaders
across regions have capitalized on public frustration, framing themselves as anti-elite figures and often
centralizing power in the process.

The digital age has further complicated democracy’s trajectory. On one hand, it has enabled greater
political engagement and mobilization; on the other, it has amplified misinformation, polarization, and
digital surveillance. These developments have challenged the integrity of democratic processes
worldwide.

Despite these setbacks, there are strong signs of democratic resilience. Youth-led movements, civic
protests, and innovations in participatory governance are keeping democratic ideals alive. In countries
across Africa and Latin America, local democratic experiments and reforms continue to inspire.

This essay argues that democracy in the 21st century is being reshaped by the digital revolution,
populist politics, and global backsliding—yet it also shows surprising resilience and innovation. In the
South Asian context, particularly in India, democracy faces deep institutional and cultural challenges, even
as citizens continue to engage with and redefine it in new ways. The evolution of democracy in this region
provides critical insight into global trends.

The Digital Revolution and Democracy

Technology has radically redefined the democratic experience, making political information and
participation more accessible than ever before. The digital revolution has given rise to new forms of
engagement—from online petitions to hashtag movements—and reshaped election campaigns and
policy discourse.

In India, the scale and scope of digital political engagement are vast. The 2014 and 2019 general elections
saw political parties, leverage social media and data analytics with unprecedented sophistication.
WhatsApp groups, Twitter trends, and YouTube content have become essential tools for reaching
voters. Digital platforms have also facilitated citizen mobilization on key issues, from the anti-
corruption movement led by Anna Hazare to recent farmers' protests.

However, the same tools that amplify democratic voices can also undermine democratic discourse. In
South Asia, the rise of misinformation, digital surveillance, and hate speech has deepened polarization. In
India and Bangladesh, for instance, state and non-state actors have used troll armies and disinformation
campaigns to delegitimize dissent and spread communal narratives. The control and monitoring of online
spaces raise concerns about privacy and freedom of expression.

Thus, while technology has expanded the democratic space, it has also created new challenges. The
region’s experience reveals that digital platforms when weaponized, can distort public opinion,
suppress dissent, and entrench power.

Populism and the Challenge to Liberal Democracy

The 21st century has seen the rise of populist leaders who claim to speak for “the people” against corrupt
elites and institutions. Populism often exploits legitimate grievances—economic disparity, identity crises,
or political stagnation—while simultaneously eroding democratic norms.

India presents a compelling example of how populism interacts with democratic institutions. Various
leaders have fused nationalism, religious identity, and economic promises to build a powerful popular
mandate. Similar trends are observable in other South Asian countries, where leaders have framed their
politics as a moral crusade against entrenched elites, often sidelining democratic procedures in the
process.

In countries like Sri Lanka and Nepal, populism has taken various forms, ranging from ethno-nationalist
agendas to calls for direct rule, bypassing parliamentary mechanisms. While such leaders initially
galvanize mass support, they often weaken checks and balances, concentrate executive power, and
undermine judicial independence.

Importantly, populism thrives within democracies—it is not inherently undemocratic. Yet, when
leaders equate electoral victory with absolute legitimacy, the spirit of liberal democracy is hollowed out.
South Asia’s experience shows how populist appeals can degrade democratic culture even when formal
institutions remain intact.

Global and Regional Democratic Backsliding

Democratic backsliding—the gradual decline in the quality of democracy—has become a global concern.
Across the world, countries are witnessing erosion in judicial independence, media freedom, and civil
liberties. South Asia has not been immune.

India, long regarded as the world’s largest democracy, has experienced several challenges that have
raised concerns about the strength of its democratic institutions. Freedom House downgraded India from
“free” to “partly free” in 2021, citing rising authoritarianism, internet shutdowns, and the suppression of
dissent. The Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), National Register of Citizens (NRC), and the
revocation of Article 370 in Kashmir have sparked global concern over majoritarian politics and human
rights. Protest movements against these policies were met with arrests, internet blackouts, and allegations
of sedition.

In Pakistan, democracy exists in a hybrid form. Civilian governments operate under the shadow of a
powerful military establishment. Allegations of rigging often mar elections, media censorship is rampant,
and civil society faces sustained pressure. Bangladesh, too, has seen its democratic credentials
questioned, particularly following controversial elections, opposition crackdowns, and the Digital Security
Act, which curtails free expression.

Nepal and Sri Lanka, despite holding elections, grapple with political instability, executive overreach, and
weakened institutions. The Sri Lankan crisis of 2022, driven by economic collapse and governance failures,
underscores how fragile democratic norms can be in the absence of accountability and transparency.

These regional patterns reflect broader global trends, revealing how democracy can erode not through
overt coups but through gradual institutional decay.

Innovations and Democratic Resilience

Despite the challenges, democracy is far from obsolete. Across South Asia, citizens and communities are
reclaiming democratic agency through grassroots activism, judicial interventions, and institutional
reforms.

India’s judiciary, while facing criticism, has also acted as a bulwark at times—intervening in cases related
to civil rights, environmental protection, and electoral integrity. Civil society organizations have mobilized
on issues from gender justice to environmental protection, using both traditional and digital platforms to
 hold power to account. The anti-CAA protests, largely youth-led and decentralized, exemplify
how dissent remains vibrant despite repression.

In Nepal, the transition from monarchy to the federal democratic republic, though messy, represents a
remarkable democratic experiment. Citizen engagement in constitution-making, despite ethnic tensions
and political wrangling, shows the potential of participatory democracy in post-conflict societies.

Deliberative and participatory innovations are emerging in local governance. In parts of India and
Bangladesh, participatory budgeting, community monitoring of schools and health centers, and village-
level planning reflect efforts to deepen democracy beyond elections. These initiatives, though scattered,
hint at a future where democracy is more inclusive and responsive.

Moreover, transnational youth movements—from climate activism to gender justice—are fostering a new
democratic consciousness. South Asia’s young population is not just a demographic fact but a political
force reshaping the contours of engagement.

Conclusion

Democracy is a living, contested process, determined by citizens' courage and creativity. Its evolution will
be determined by leaders and institutions, but its evolution depends on citizen engagement, institutional
accountability, and the capacity to adapt to global changes. Overall, democracy today is neither in
decline nor triumph—it is in flux. Adaptability with the balance of rootedness in the democratic ethos
is the key to strengthening democracy globally and nationally.

PDF Refernece URL: https://www.drishtiias.com/printpdf/the-evolution-of-democracy-in-the-21st-century

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)