Seminar Planning and Execution Rubric
Theme: Talk Forward: Inspiring Change Through Communication
Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Weigh TOTA
Improvement t L
Seminar Exceptionally Complete Seminar plan Major gaps or 15%
Planning detailed, clear, seminar plan missing minor disorganized
Document and complete with minor elements; seminar plan.
seminar plan lapses in timeline and
with well- organization Gantt chart
thought-out or detail. unclear.
timeline and
Gantt chart.
Execution of Smooth, Minor timing Some delays Poor time 25%
Seminar professional or or disruptions; management;
flow; on-time engagement moderate disorganized
presentations; issues; overall audience seminar flow;
high audience good participation. low audience
engagement execution. participation.
and strong
coordination.
Teamwork Excellent Good Uneven Poor teamwork; 10%
and collaboration collaboration; collaboration; major gaps in
Committee within assigned most fulfilled some committee
Performance committee(s); their roles members performance.
all members responsibly. passive or
contributed lacking
effectively. initiative.
Speaker Speakers are Mostly Some issues Speakers poorly 10%
Management highly relevant, appropriate with speaker chosen, not
engaging, and speakers; choice, prepared, or
presentations minor timing preparation, not fitting
clearly aligned or topic or seminar
with objectives; alignment coordination. objectives.
well- issues.
coordinated.
Same Day Outstanding Good video SDE includes Poorly edited, 15%
Edit (SDE) video: captures capturing some incomplete
Video key moments most key highlights but SDE; major
(intro, moments; lacks cohesion highlights
takeaways, minor pacing or missed key missing.
audience or editing moments.
engagement, issues.
special
moments) with
strong
storytelling,
editing, and
pacing.
Post-Seminar Comprehensive Complete Basic Incomplete or 15%
Evaluation evaluation evaluation evaluation; weak
and Final gathered and and reflective final report evaluation; final
Report analyzed; final report; lacks depth or report lacks
highly minor gaps in critical coherence or
insightful final analysis. reflection. analysis.
report; strong
reflection on
strengths,
weaknesses,
and
improvements.
Peer Peer Peer Peer Peer 10%
Evaluation evaluations evaluations evaluations evaluations
(Individual show active generally show mixed reveal major
Accountability participation, positive; contributions lack of
) responsibility, minor issues among contribution or
and teamwork. with members. accountability.
participation
noted.
TOTAL: 100%
Peer Evaluation Form
(To be accomplished by the Committee Head only)
Instructions: The head of each committee is tasked to evaluate the performance of their fellow
members based on their contribution, teamwork, reliability, and communication. Please assess each
member honestly and respectfully. All responses will remain confidential and will serve as a basis
for evaluating individual participation.
Name of Contributio Teamwork Reliability Communica Total Comments TOTAL
Classmate n to Work & & tion Skills (out of (Optional)
(5 points) Cooperatio Responsibil (5 points) 20)
n (5 points) ity (5
points)
Scoring Guide per Category:
- 5 – Excellent (always contributes / cooperates / reliable / communicates very well)
- 4 – Very Good (often contributes, minor lapses)
- 3 – Good (average contribution and participation)
- 2 – Fair (needs improvement)
- 1 – Poor (rarely contributed, hard to work with)
Seminar Planning Document Rubric
Criteria Excellent Good Satisfactory Needs Weigh TOTA
Improvement t L
Seminar Title Title is Title and Title and/or Title and 20%
and creative, description are description is description are
Description clear, and clear and vague or unclear, confusing,
highly relevant but lacks impact. or missing.
relevant; could be more
description is engaging.
concise,
focused, and
inspiring.
Target Target Target Target Target audience is 15%
Audience audience is audience is audience is not clearly
Identification clearly mostly somewhat identified or
defined and appropriate defined but inappropriate for
appropriate with minor lacks clarity topic.
to the gaps. or focus.
seminar
topic.
Seminar Agenda is Agenda is Agenda has Agenda is 20%
Agenda detailed, complete but gaps, unclear incomplete,
(Program realistic, and minor parts, or confusing, or
Flow) logically improvements unrealistic disorganized.
organized; all in detail or timing.
parts of the organization
seminar are needed.
clearly
scheduled.
Timeline and Timeline and Timeline and Timeline or Timeline and Gantt 20%
Gantt Chart Gantt chart Gantt chart are Gantt chart chart missing or
are complete, mostly incomplete extremely unclear.
realistic, and complete with or unclear in
visually clear; minor missing sequencing.
all major details.
tasks and
deadlines are
mapped.
Overall Document is Document is Document Document is 15%
Organization exceptionally well-organized has poorly organized
and well- with minor noticeable and difficult to
Presentation organized, formatting or organization follow.
easy to read, clarity issues. or formatting
with issues.
professional
formatting
and minimal
errors.
Creativity Document Good creativity Basic effort Minimal effort; 10%
and Initiative shows high and initiative shown; little document feels
creativity, shown. creativity or rushed or
initiative, and extra incomplete.
clear effort to initiative.
go beyond
minimum
requirements
.
Same-Day Edit (SDE) Rubric
Criteria / 2 – Need 1 – Low
4 – Excellent 3 – Good
Ratings Improvement Performance
Content It covers all the It includes basic It includes essential The content
topics in depth with knowledge about the information about the includes minor
details and topic. The content topic, but has 1–2 details and it has
Criteria / 2 – Need 1 – Low
4 – Excellent 3 – Good
Ratings Improvement Performance
examples. The
several mistakes
knowledge of the seems to be good. mistakes in the facts.
in the facts.
topic is excellent.
The product shows It uses ideas from other
The product shows He/She uses ideas
certain originality. It people (quoting them),
great originality. The from other people
Originality shows the use of new but there is little
ideas are creative without quoting
ideas and of evidence of original
and witty. them.
shrewdness. ideas.
More than four
There are not any Three or fewer
Use of Four spelling or spelling or
mistakes in spelling spelling mistakes or
Language grammar mistakes. grammar
or grammar. punctuation mistakes.
mistakes.
A lot of different
Several (3–4) different One or two different
shots, camera
shots, camera angles, shots, camera angles, Little effort has
Videograp angles, sound
sound effects and/or sound effects and/or an been made to
hy – effects, and an
an adequate use of adequate use of provide variety to
Interest adequate use of
zooming providing zooming providing the video.
zooming providing
variety in the video. variety in the video.
variety in the video.
The quality of the video The quality of the
The overall quality of Most of the quality of
Videograp is not very good but the video and the
the video and the the video and the
hy – Clarity overall focus was focus are not very
focus were excellent. focus were excellent.
excellent. good.
Final Report Rubric (One-Page Individual Reflection)
Needs Points
Criteria Excellent (25–30) Good (19–24) Fair (13–18) Improvement Earne
(0–12) d
Thorough, insightful, Covers some key
Covers most Lacks key
Content and and comprehensive points; some
content areas content; ideas
Depth (30 content; all key points information is
with adequate are unclear or
pts) are addressed with vague or
detail unsupported
depth underdeveloped
Organization Some Poorly
Logical flow; clear Mostly logical
and disorganization; organized; hard
introduction, body, structure; minor
Structure transitions are to follow or
and conclusion lapses in flow
(20 pts) weak or abrupt lacks structure
Strong use of credible Uses appropriate Limited or weak Little or no
Research
sources; data is well- sources with evidence; credible
and Evidence
integrated and minor errors or insufficient source research; lacks
(20 pts)
supports claims gaps support evidence
Clear, concise, and Some minor Noticeable Poor grammar;
Language
formal language; grammar/style grammar and style informal
and Style (15
error-free grammar issues that don’t issues; meaning language; hard
pts)
and mechanics affect clarity sometimes unclear to understand
Follows required Major
Formatting format (e.g., APA Minor errors in Several errors in formatting
and Citations 7th); citations and formatting or format or citation; issues; citations
(10 pts) references are citation style inconsistent style missing or
complete and correct incorrect
Originality Demonstrates original Some original Few original ideas; No originality;
and Insight thinking and ideas; shows mostly summary or lacks insight or
Needs Points
Criteria Excellent (25–30) Good (19–24) Fair (13–18) Improvement Earne
(0–12) d
engagement with personal
(5 pts) meaningful insights repetition
the topic engagement
