Growth Factors, Part A All-in-One Download
Growth Factors, Part A All-in-One Download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medidownload.com/product/growth-factors-part-a/
XI
xii PREFACE
Derek Le Roith
Carolyn Bondy
INSULIN-LIKE GROWTH FACTORS
Abstract 1
I. Introduction 2
II. Molecular and Cellular Aspects 2
A. IGFs 3
B. Receptors 5
C. IGF Binding Proteins 9
III. Physiological and Clinical Aspects 11
A. Embryonic Growth and Development 11
B. Postnatal Growth 12
C. IGF-I and Intermediary MetaboHsm 13
D. Clinical Uses of IGF-I 15
E. IGF-II 17
F. IGFs and Neoplasia 18
IV. Conclusion 18
References 19
ABSTRACT
The insulin-like growth factor family of peptides, binding proteins and receptors is
involved in normal growth and development. Later they are important in the differen
tiated function of a number of tissues. Aberrations in this growth factor system are
associated with different diseases, rangingfromshort stature and diabetes to malignancy.
1
DEREK LEROITH and CAROLYN BONDY
With the advent of recombinant DNA technology, sufficient quantities of the ligands
(and binding proteins) have become available for clinical testing in the therapy of certain
diseases. These exciting new possibilities need to be assessed carefully for side-effects.
I. INTRODUCTION
The insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) regulate growth and develop
ment of multiple tissues during embryonic and fetal stages (reviewed in Daughaday
and Rotwein, 1989; Werner et al., 1994). During postnatal stages they continue to
affect growth and maintain the differentiated function in these numerous tissues
and in specific cell types. While the liver produces large amounts of both IGFs,
many extrahepatic tissues synthesize and secrete these factors as well (Lowe et al.,
1987; Hoyt et al., 1988). Circulating IGFs are of hepatic origin and act in a classical
endocrine mode, whereas extrahepatic IGFs act locally in a paracrine or autocrine
mode. The biological actions of the IGFs are mediated primarily by the type I IGF
receptor (IGF-I receptor) which is ubiquitously expressed (LeRoith et al., 1995).
The actions of the IGFs are also affected by a family of IGF-specific binding
proteins (IGFBPs) found in circulation and in extracellular fluids; these proteins
may enhance or inhibit the actions of the IGFs primarily by affecting their
availability to cell surface receptors (Baxter and Martin, 1989; Rechler, 1993; Jones
andClemmons, 1995).
In this review we will initially discuss the basic molecular and cellular aspects
of the IGFs, their binding proteins and receptors, and use examples from normal
physiology and pathology to highlight their importance. Then we summarize the
available data on the clinical studies of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) and,
to a lesser extent, IGF-II which have recently become available for clinical research.
The human IGF-I gene, on the long arm of chromosome 12 (Tricoli et al., 1984),
spans more than 90 kb of chromosomal DNA and contains at least six exons. Exons
Insulin-Like Growth Factors
B30
A21
INSULIN PROINSULIN
Pi Pz P3 P4
'Gi^-^ J n n n nn I
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Figure 2. Structure of mammalian IGF-I and IGF-II genes. Exons are numbered.
Known promoter sites in the IGF-II gene are labeled P1-P4.
containing transcripts, on the other hand, are particularly abundant in the liver and
are generally more responsive to growth hormone (GH). Thus, during development,
exon 2-containing transcripts appear after exon 1-containing transcripts in the liver,
but increase markedly at the onset of GH-dependent linear growth (Jensen et al.,
1991; Kim et al., 1991; Kikuchi et al, 1992).
At the posttranscriptional level there appears to be regulation of mRNA splicing,
in certain species of IGF-I mRNA (Shimatsu and Rotwein, 1987b), of a 186 bp
region of exon 1 that potentially influences translatability of that transcript. Fur
thermore, two alternative E-peptides may be transcribed depending on exon 5 or
exon 6 usage; GH seems to favor exon 5 retention. At the level of mRNA stability,
the longer -'7.5 kb transcripts, derived from distal polyadenylation site usage in the
long exon 6, are more unstable than the shorter -'1 kb mRNAs derived by more
proximal polyadenylation site usage (Lowe et al., 1988; Lund et al., 1989; Heppler
et al., 1990; Steenbergh et al., 1991).
IGF-U
The IGF-II gene spans ^30 kb of chromosomal DNAon the distal end of the short
arm of human chromosome 11 (Tricoli et al., 1984), immediately 3' to the insulin
gene. Like IGF-I, the IGF-II gene is complex consisting of nine exons. The mature
peptide is encoded by exons 7,8 and 9. Transcription is controlled by four different
promoters (PI - P4) (Dull et al., 1984) (Figure 2). The promoters are activated in
a tissue- and development-specific manner; promoter PI is activated in adult liver,
whereas promoters P2, P3 and P4 are active in most fetal tissues and adult
nonhepatic tissues (dePagter-Holthuizen et al., 1987; dePagter-Holthuizen, 1988;
Holthuizen et al, 1990). PI is a TATA-less, GC-rich promoter with heterogeneous
transcription initiation. Liver-specific expression of PI is regulated by the
CAAT/enhancer binding protein (C/EBP) and the liver-enriched activator protein
Insulin-Like Growth Factors 5
(LAP) (Sussenbach et al, 1994). Promoters P3 and P4 contain a TATA box and P3
also has a CCAAT box. P3 and P4 exhibit transcription from specific sites and are
more highly regulated than PI. Human IGF-II promoter P3 is expressed in many
fetal and non-hepatic adult tissues and is regulated by the krox 20/egr2 and krox
24/egrl transcription factors (Sussenbach et al., 1994). Multiple IGF-II mRNA
transcripts are produced as a function of specific promoter usage and different
lengths of 3' UTRs resulting from use of multiple polyadenylation sites. Transcripts
from P2 and P4 have shorter 5'-UTRs and are preferentially translated (Irminger et
al., 1987; Rechler, 1991).
In human tissues, the IGF-II gene demonstrates promoter-specific genomic
imprinting (Vu and Hoffman, 1994). When promoter P1 is used, as with adult liver,
both maternal and paternal alleles are transcribed, but in the case of promoters
P2—P4 usage, only the paternal allele is expressed. Because promoters P2—P4 are
clustered in a '-5 kb DNA region, whereas PI is ~20 kb upstream (Figure 2), this
suggests that the imprinting signals lie between promoters PI and P2 (Vu and
Hoffman, 1994).
In murine species, the equivalent of promoter PI is absent and the remaining
three promoters are all imprinted except for the choroid plexus and leptomeninges
where biallelic expression occurs (Pedone et al., 1994; DeChiara et al., 1991a;
DeChiara et al., 1991b). Interestingly, in the mouse and rat, postnatal IGF-II
expression decreases dramatically leading to undetectable circulating IGF-II levels
(except in the CNS), whereas in humans, where the PI promoter is active in liver,
IGF-II expression persists throughout life. Because the PI promoter is biallelically
expressed, it has been postulated that this may allow more abundant synthesis of
the IGF-II peptide which is released into the circulation. Loss of genomic imprint
ing has been implicated as a reason for the high level of expression of IGF-II in many
cancers (Steenman et al, 1994; Wemer and LeRoith, 1995), where the IGF-II peptide
may be important as an autocrine growth factor enhancing tumor growth (Zhan et al.,
1994).
B. Receptors
The biological effects of the IGFs are mediated by a family of specific membrane-
associated glycoprotein receptors including the insulin IGF-I and IGF-II receptors
and the insulin receptor-related-receptor (IRR) (Zhang and Roth, 1992; Reinhardt
et al., 1993; Kovacina and Roth, 1995; LeRoith et al., 1995). The insulin IRR, and
IGF-I receptors are closely related tyrosine kinase receptors, whereas the IGF-II
receptor is identical to the cation-independent mannose-6-phosphate (M-6-P) re
ceptor (Figure 3). Because the biological effects of the IGFs on growth, develop
ment, and differentiated functions are primarily via the IGF-I receptor, we will
concentrate on its structural and functional characteristics. Because the IRR has
limited tissue distribution and does not bind the IGFs, it does not apparently affect
IGF action.
U 03 2 dJ O
Oj C tn
^^ <-
Ia
JD (U a; 4S re
CD U
— S" ^
I1^
a
Si o CD
uL ^V ^
U ?^
Q. I .
X o
UJ Q I o O (J
CD
2 E
^
CD
(O O Q. " " Q. § cr
? Q- I I I I I I I I I I I I I IX U C CD
u _c CD
UL S CD c a
CL .C
c|S
t/i 13 »-
CD • - ' -
o
-^ £ W)
Q. -O CD
O KYVyj
_ -c Q.
•E DC
3 2
0) C
JiYXYI "O
T.
CD
U
C 1}
— >» CQ.'g ^
I
' c h Q.
u_ = : 203 ybi Qj^
u 5j
-^ -^ S:
o B S ^ s
C CD Q.
2 y t CD
: Q.
^ -Q E
DC DC
2 ?^
•^ (n u
^5 CD c
§ "^ CD
- D ■;=; . E
-n 2 c
^ g OJ
13 5^ §"° -
i.E
o u. ^ ^ Q)
Q . *<D O DO <D
.KXXXl,
Js '^ *-
-5 -c a.
= "§
3 CD
03 CD
a V) ci; .9
1 K.AXXJ 1 to to
Q.
— CDO tn CD
CD
CE O ^ Q. U
1 NAAA^
E Q.
X
o CD
O u (i;
1 d
c
S..E <u
tn
to
O 2 o -D
CD __ u
Q.
(0 9) CO
III 8 2E U
E^ 'E
O GC O
<v y^ 'i—
u •£ E — 03 O CT3
to
CJ
"cu o -^
to
.2? tj
Insulin-Like Growth Factors 7
IGF-! Receptor
The human IGF-I receptor spans more than 100 kb of chromosomal DNA at the
distal end of the long arm of chromosome 15 and consists of 21 exons (Abbott et
al., 1992). The gene encodes contiguous a and p subunits which are cleaved during
processing and the mature functional receptor is a heterotetrameric glycoprotein in
an (aP)2 configuration where the subunits are joined by disulfide bridges. The a
subunits are entirely extracellular and bind the ligands, primarily, in the region of
the cysteine-rich domain. The P subunits are anchored in the membrane and contain
a cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase domain which has 84% homology with the equivalent
region in the insulin receptor and IRR (Ebina et al., 1985; Ullrich et al., 1985;
Ullrich etal, 1986).
The IGF-I receptor is widely expressed at high levels during embryogenesis,
suggesting an important role in tissue development (see below). Extensive studies
on characterizing the promoter region have revealed a number of features involved
in regulating IGF-I receptor gene expression (Werner et al., 1989; Werner et al.,
1990; Cooke et al., 1991; Mamula and Goldfme, 1992; Werner et al., 1992). Both
the unusually long (-^1 kb) 5' UTR and the proximal -^500 bp 5' flanking region are
very GC-rich with multiple Spl binding sites and no TATA or CCAAT boxes.
However, transcription initiation begins at a single site surrounded by an "initiator"
sequence. Spl binding to the promoter region may regulate transcription initiation
in the absence of TATA and CCAAT boxes (Smale and Baltimore, 1989).
Ligand binding to the IGF-I receptor initiates receptor autophosphorylation
which involves the phosphorylation of a cluster of three tyrosines (1131,1135 and
1136) in the kinase domain (Gronberg et al., 1993; Kato et al., 1993; Kato et al.,
1994). As with the insulin receptor, autophosphorylation activates the tyrosine
kinase activity of the receptor, leading to tyrosine phosphorylation of cellular
substrates. The substrate that has been best characterized to date is the insulin
substrate-1 (IRS-1) (Sun et al., 1991; Myers and White, 1993) (Figure 4). IRS-1
contains multiple tyrosine residues in a Tyr-Met-X-Met (YMXM) or related motifs.
Phosphorylation of tyrosines in these motifs mediate binding of other substrates,
such as the 85-kDa subunit of phosphatidyl-inositol 3' (PI3') kinase and Grb2
(Myers et al., 1992; Yamamoto et al., 1992; Baltenspergan et al., 1993; Giorgetti et
al., 1993; Myers et al., 1993; Skolnik et al., 1993). IGF-I stimulates PI3' kinase
activity and MAP kinase activity, the latter being the result of activation of the
ras/raf kinase pathway initiated by Grb2 binding to IRS-1. Other known pathways
involved in IGF-I receptor activation include protein tyrosine phosphatase-IB
(Kenner, 1993) and SHC and crk (Beitner-Johnson and LeRoith, 1995).
IGF'II/M-6'P Receptor
Transcription Factors
Gene Expression
IGF-I receptors, the tail does not contain any tyrosine kinase activity. The major
function of this receptor is to target recently synthesized lysosomal enzymes from
the tmnS'Golgi network to lysosomes and to internalize lysosomal enzymes that
have escaped the cell. It also internalizes surface-bound IGF-II, targeting it to the
lysosomal compartment for degradation. Certain studies have suggested that, in a
limited number of cells, the IGF-II/M-6-P receptor may mediate Ca^"^ uptake, cell
growth, and generation of inositol phosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (Hari et al.,
1987; Matsmaga et al., 1988; Rogers and Hammerman, 1988). These effects were
mediated by a G-protein (Gi2) -related mechanism (Nishimoto et al., 1987; Nishi-
moto et al., 1989; Okamoto et al., 1990). However, a recent study has failed to
Insulin-Like Growth Factors 9
reproduce these results, and the general conclusion is that the IGF-n/M-6-P receptor
does not contain any signaling function (Komer et al., 1995).
The role of the IGFs and their receptors in embryonic and postnatal growth is
strongly supported by studies in which targeted disruption of various components
has been obtained in mice by homologous recombination (DeChiara et al., 1991b;
Baker et al., 1993; Liu et al., 1993; Powell-Braxton et al., 1993). Most mice
homozygous for a null mutation of the IGF-I gene die perinatally, though a small
number survive to adulthood. These mice demonstrate a 40% reduction in body
weight at birth and a 70% reduction at eight weeks of age. They are infertile and
have delayed ossification, underdeveloped muscles, and poorly organized lungs,
suggesting an important role for IGF-I in tissue differentiation and development.
On the other hand, targeted disruption of the IGF-II gene results in mice that weigh
60% of their normal littermate weight but survive, grow postnatally, albeit at a lower
weight, and are fertile. Thus, IGF-II may be important for determining overall body
size, but not essential for organogenesis. The IGF-I receptor plays a very important
role in organ development and probably mediates the effects of both IGF-I and
IGF-II. Mice lacking the IGF-I receptor gene are severely growth retarded by birth,
weighing only 45% of controls and die due to impaired muscular development
leading to respiratory failure. Many other organs are also severely retarded in their
development. Both the naturally occurring Tme mutation and the IGF-II/M-6-P
receptor-lacking mice show the same phenotype, that is, increased body size and
polydactylic and embryonic/neonatal lethality. Because this phenotype is rescued
by breeding mice lacking both the IGF-II/M-6-P receptor and IGF-II, it suggests
that the phenotype of the Tme mutation is due to excess IGF-II acting through the
IGF-I receptor, which is normally expressed in these mice. The lack of the
IGF-II/M-6-P receptor in the Tme mutants probably results in reduced clearance of
IGF-II resulting in overstimulation of the IGF-I receptor, again, strongly supporting
a role for the IGF-I receptor in signal transduction and for the IGF-II/M-6-P receptor
in IGF-II internalization and degradation (Lau et al., 1994; Wang et al., 1994).
C. IGF Binding Proteins
In addition to the IGFs and their receptors, the IGFBPs play a critical role in IGF
action. These are a family of six proteins, IGFBP-1 to 6, that specifically bind the
IGFs with high affinity and modulate their bioavailability and biological actions
(Table 1) (Baxter and Martin, 1989; Rechler, 1993; Jones and Clemmons, 1995).
Molecular
The IGFBPs are a family of closely related proteins, with N- and C-termini that
are highly conserved at the amino acid level, including 18 cysteine residues, 12 in
the NH2-terminal region and six in the COOH-terminal region. Most of the
cysteines are disulfide bonded, giving rise to the tertiary structure (Wood et al.,
1988; Rechler, 1993).
10 DEREK LEROITH and CAROLYN BONDY
The IGFBPs bind the IGFs with high affinity (-10 to ~11 M), often greater than
the affinity demonstrated by the IGF-I receptor. IGFBP-2 and 6 have greater affinity
for IGF-II than IGF-I. The IGFBPs are ubiquitously expressed and are found in
most body fluids including plasma, cerebrospinal fluid, amniotic fluid, lymph,
milk, etc. In some, IGFBP-3 and 4, N-glycosylation adds to the heterogeneity seen,
whereas IGFBP-6 is 0-linked glycosylated.
In plasma, the maj or portion of the IGFs circulate bound to a '^ 150-kDa molecular
weight ternary complex consisting of the ligand (IGF-I or IGF-II), IGFBP-3 and
an acid-labile subunit (ALS) (Baxter and Martin, 1989; Leong et al., 1992). Because
ALS usually circulates in excess, IGFBP-3 may play a more significant role in
determining the total concentration of circulating IGF. The IGFs are also found, to
a lesser degree, in a 40-50 molecular weight complex that includes IGFBP-2,4 or
6 and, to the least extent, IGFBP-1. Very little free IGF is measurable because of
the short half-life of the free hormone. While the 150-kDa molecular weight
complex controls the bioavailability of IGFs, the smaller molecular weight com
plexes may be important in transporting IGFs out of circulation to the target tissue
(Baretal., 1990).
Circulating IGFs are bound to IGFBPs which prolong their half-lives and deliver
them to their target tissues. At the cellular level, IGFBPs control IGF action either
by restricting access to cell surface receptors and, thereby, inhibiting growth and
related anabolic frmctions or by augmenting this interaction and thereby potentiat
ing the cellular response (Elgin et al., 1987; Bar et al., 1989; Blum et al., 1989).
Most of the studies have demonstrated that, with the exception of IGFBP-4 which
seems to be uniformly inhibitory, all of the IGFBPs have the capacity to potentiate
and inhibit IGFs biological responses.
The affinity of released IGFBPs (i.e., IGFBP-3 and 5) for IGFs is significantly
higher than cell-surface associated forms of IGFBP. Therefore, if the majority of
the IGFBPs are in the interstitial fluids or culture medium, they will sequestrate
Insu I in-Like Growth Factors 11
IGFs and inhibit their interaction with the receptor. On the other hand, when
cell-surface bound, the IGFBPs have reduced affinity for IGFs, and the IGFs are
then able to interact with their receptors. How this effect results in potentiated
function is not clear. Some studies suggest that cell-surface-associated IGFBP-3
inhibits the rate of receptor internalization, thereby, prolonging its activity at the
cell surface. Another study using IGF analogues suggested that potentiation re
quired binding of the IGF to both IGFBP-1 and the IGF-I receptor (Conover and
Powell, 1991; Camacho-Hubner et al., 1992).
The mechanism(s) of interaction of the IGFBPs with the cell surface membrane
is also not clear. Some IGFBPs contain Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) sequences that allow
interaction with integrin receptors; others such as IGFBP-3, 4, and 5 are
glycosylated (Table 1) (Jones et al., 1993; Arai et al., 1994a; Arai et al, 1994b).
Whether these features are important for the functions described above is yet to be
clearly defined. IGFBP-1 and 3 contain multiple serine residues that are phospho-
rylated intracellularly. Phosphorylated IGFBP-1 inhibits IGF action on certain
tissues, whereas the dephosphorylated form has manyfold lower affinity for IGF-I
(Frost and Tseng, 1991).
Finally, multiple serine and metallothionein proteases have been isolated that
proteolytically cleave the IGFBPs and aid in the release of the IGFs; they, too, may
be significant in modulating IGF biological activity at the tissue level (Fowlkes and
Freemark, 1992; Nam et al., 1994)
throughout life. IGF-I deletants are also bom small but their growth retardation
appears late in gestation and is not associated with reduction in placental size. In
contrast to the IGF-II null mice, most of the IGF-I null mice die in the first days or
weeks after birth (Liu et al., 1993; Powell-Braxton et al., 1994). The cause of death
in these mice is not clear. The few that survive demonstrate extremely retarded
postnatal growth, so that, by two months of age, they are approximately 30% the
size of wild-type littermates and both sexes are infertile. Combined IGF-I/IGF-II
deletants and IGF-I receptor null mice are bom very small and uniformly die within
hours of birth, apparently due to hypoplasia of respiratory muscles (Liu et al., 1993;
Powell—Braxton et al., 1994). IGF-I and II are present in human gestation (Han et
al., 1987; Hill, 1990) and, presumably, have important roles in fetal growth and
development, although as yet there are few fetal syndromes attributed to IGF-I or
-II deficiency. Dismption of the distal portion of chromosome 15q, which includes
the locus of the IGF-I receptor gene, is associated with severe fetal and postnatal
growth retardation (Roback et al., 1991), and a child with intrauterine growth
retardation was reported to have a 50% decrease in IGF-I binding to cultured
fibroblasts (Bierich et al., 1984). Overproduction of IGF-II during gestation has
been implicated in fetal overgrowth in the Beckwith—Wiedeman syndrome
(Weksberg et al, 1994).
B. Postnatal Growth