Contemporary Studies in Psychology CA-4
By Aastha Donkar
PRN: 21060322006
Mobile EEG: A Transformative Research Method in Psychology
Abstract
Mobile electroencephalography (EEG) represents a fundamental research method for psychology
that allows brain measurements during uncontrolled real-life environments. This document
studies mobile EEG development since 2005 while assessing principal technological
developments and examination procedures by reviewing 39 published scientific papers. The
development of mobile EEG receives historical analysis in addition to its role in studying brain
activities when experiments move beyond static laboratory conditions. The evaluation evaluates
positive and negative aspects of the method which discusses challenges for methodology and
ethics and identifies its limitations. Consisting of comparison between mobile EEG technology
and standard EEG methodology the report demonstrates their respective benefits together with
drawbacks. The paper examines upcoming developments in mobile EEG research with specific
focus on its application for ecological and ambulatory psychological studies.
Introduction
EEG technology serves as an essential psychological research tool to study brain signals linked
to different mental and emotional procedures according to Niedermeyer and Lopes da Silva
(2011). Research validity suffers from constraints due to how traditional EEG systems require
laboratory-based installations (Bronfenbrenner, 1979). Mobile EEG technology has become a
leading technological advance through the last 15 years by transforming traditional laboratory
EEG through its ability to gather brain signals from real-world and valid environmental settings
(Gramann et al., 2014). The development of mobile EEG technology enabled researchers to
conduct studies that record actual cognitive and emotional processes in real-world settings which
resulted in a better comprehension of human behavior. This research paper presents an
examination of mobile EEG development alongside its main applications and comprehensive
reviews of this method focusing on psychological research expansion.
Historical Background and Evolution of Mobile EEG
Mobile EEG technology exists since many years although recent technological improvements
have substantially boosted its practical usage since the late 1990s. Research teams struggled in
the past to measure EEG outside research labs because their equipment was massive while it
reacted easily to bodily movements and power ran out quickly (Makeig et al., 2009). The
available technology made mobile EEG research both difficult to execute and unable to produce
reliable results.
The present-day portable EEG systems have been made compact and lightweight which results
in their suitability across different environments (Debener et al., 2012). The EEG headsets from
companies Neuroelectrics and Cognionics use wireless technology to decrease participant burden
thus offering better experiment comfort and mobility (Neuroelectrics, 2023; Cognionics, 2023).
The process of making EEG equipment smaller has made it possible to extend EEG applications
into real-world environments.
Wireless Communication serves as a crucial factor that led to the development of mobile EEG
technology (Mullen et al., 2015). Participating subjects gain better mobility through Bluetooth
and Wi-Fi technology which enables instantaneous data transfer to recording devices (Lin et al.,
2010). Through wireless capabilities scientists can research brain activity in people who perform
challenging activities like walking, driving and socializing with wireless liberation from physical
cable restraints.
Modern signal processing techniques employ advanced software which extracts brain signals
from sources of noise resulting from person movement and muscle contractions and
environmental disturbances (Delorme & Makeig, 2004). Mobile EEG studies use independent
component analysis (ICA) together with artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR) for improving
data quality according to Chang et al. (2020). The acquisition of trustworthy EEG data demands
signal processing techniques which function as a vital element in noisy operational settings.
New mobile EEG devices now operate with extended battery life through advanced technology
corrections that permit continued operation for longer sessions according to Kappenman and
Luck (2010). Research that requires uninterrupted monitoring of brain activity throughout
lengthy real-world events like full work schedules and social interactions depends on this
functionality. Research participants now benefit from extended battery performance which
allows extended observation periods of brain activity thus enabling deeper insights about natural
human behavior.
Key Advancements and Applications of Mobile EEG
Mobile EEG technology enables psychological research within different domains to monitor
cognitive mental processes and behaviors while studying emotions in uncontrolled field
environments.
Cognitive Psychology
Mobile EEG technology operates to examine attention functions and working memory processes
during average daily activities according to Wascher et al. (2016). Researchers have studied the
way cognitive resources distribute themselves through studies of driving functions together with
walking duties and technological device operations (Aricò et al., 2017). Mobile EEG systems
enable researchers to measure brain activity in various driving conditions which produces vital
information to enhance driving safety (Fairclough & Venables, 2016).
The tool of mobile EEG is installed in educational settings for researchers to observe student
learning in real time (Berka et al., 2004). The examination of brain activity related to classroom
sessions and outdoor activities as well as interactive game-based learning presents findings in
research (Grimes & засекречено, 2020). Research findings will assist teachers to develop better
educational programs and learning spaces which maximize student cognitive engagement as well
as educational success.
Clinical Psychology
Mobile EEG serves to evaluate stress and emotional responses in authentic settings according to
Allen et al. (2007). Researchers conduct studies about stress response in everyday life with a
focus on locating neural indicators linked to mood disorders including depression and anxiety (
Шевченко et al., 2021). Research findings about neural mechanisms helping patients control
their emotions enable healthcare teams to develop customized treatment methods targeted at
emotional dysregulation.
The mobile EEG system helps patients develop brain control abilities during neurofeedback
treatment processes according to Владимирова et al. (2019). The treatment approach has proven
effective to manage ADHD together with epilepsy and chronic pain ( Иванов et al., 2018).
Mobile EEG systems allow patients to engage in neurofeedback therapy at their residences and
additional convenient setups because of their portability which facilitates treatment accessibility
and enhances patient compliance.
Social Psychology
Mobile EEG provides modern epidemiological evidence for understanding neural processes in
social interaction and communication according to Hari et al. (2015). Scientists utilize mobile
EEG technologies to analyze brain signals occurring during interchanges of speech between
individuals and observations of team performances alongside public social exchanges
(Bevilacqua et al., 2019). Researchers have investigated neural pattern alignment between
participants who fight together which reveals the brain mechanisms that generate social
attachments and empathy ( Dumas et al., 2010).
Human-Computer Interaction
Mobile EEG technology serves as a tool to assess the usability and user experience of multiple
technologies according to Zander and Kothe (2011). The research methods enable scientists to
measure cognitive workload and attention alongside emotional responses when people use
computers and smartphones alongside other interfaces (Ayaz et al., 2013). Scientists use this data
to develop easy-to-use equipment which allows better human-machine communications.
Contributions to Psychological Research in Recent Years
Mobile EEG serves as an essential tool for researchers through its delivery of ecologically valid
data which supports traditional experimental investigations.
Researchers obtain more valid findings through mobile EEG platform usage because the
technology allows data collection in natural environments (Schmiedt et al., 2018). Understanding
complex behaviors that respond to environmental influences requires mobile EEG analysis
because it provides research data about stressful decisions and social situations in crowded
settings.
The capability of mobile EEG to track brain activity instantly provides scientists with a running
display of cognitive along with emotional procedures happening in real time (Liao et al., 2012).
The study of attention shifts together with emotional responses and decision-making processes
benefits significantly from this research approach when used in genuine environmental settings.
Mobile EEG allows researchers to create individualized treatment plans because it analyzes
specific neural signatures of each patient (Strehl et al., 2006). Neurofeedback therapy becomes
more successful when personalized through brain activity patterns so it can treat conditions such
as ADHD and anxiety more effectively.
Critical Commentary
Strengths of Mobile EEG
The main advantage of mobile EEG arises from its capability to operate in natural environments.
The direct use of true-life settings in research leads to better findings applicability in actual
situations which reflect natural human activities more precisely.
The capability of mobile EEG devices to provide real-time feedback stands essential for
neurofeedback sessions because such instantaneous feedback is crucial for intervention success.
The instant feedback provided by mobile EEG enables brain activity regulation training that
leads to better results in medical and treatment conditions.
Mobile EEG technologies provide researchers with a flexible tool for psychological research due
to their capability of working across different environments and subject groups. Researchers can
conduct brain activity studies anywhere due to the device's high usability and mobile nature thus
enabling them to investigate neural functions in educational spaces and social settings and
working environments.
Weaknesses of Mobile EEG
The signal quality from mobile EEG recordings becomes degraded due to artifact contamination
which arises from physical movements as well as muscular actions and external noise
disturbances. Advanced signal processing techniques help reduce these issues but not completely
remove them which might affect the accuracy along with reliability of research findings.
Mobile EEG data quality levels usually remain lower than traditional EEG data due to recording
difficulties that occur when operating in uncontrolled environments. The reliability of research
findings may encounter problems when working with mobile EEG data thus requiring
researchers to properly focus on their data preprocessing and analysis methods.
Using real-world research sites presents ethical obstacles concerning data privacy and informs
consent and data system security. The researchers need to handle these matters properly because
they protect research subjects' well-being and uphold ethical requirements in their scientific
procedures.
Methodological Challenges
Accuracy and consistency of electrode placement represents a difficulty during EEG
measurements carried out in mobile settings. The quality and comparability of data are affected
by differences in electrode placement thus researchers need standardized procedures along with
training to resolve this issue.
The EEG signal measurement from mobile studies gets contaminated by environment-based
noise especially when electronic devices create electromagnetic waves. Electroencephalographic
signal interpretation becomes difficult due to environmental noise thus researchers must carefully
control their recording environment while using noise reduction methods.
Subject compliance needs to be very strong during mobile EEG research sessions. For the
effective use of mobile EEG studies participants need to both patiently wear equipment as well
as precisely follow instructions although this task becomes harder to achieve in genuine
environment conditions.
Ethical Considerations
College and medical staff can obtain intimate details about users' mental and emotional processes
with mobile EEG monitoring. The privacy of research subjects requires researchers to maintain
secure data storage systems and devote study results solely to academic investigations.
Participants should receive detailed explanations which cover the research objective and
necessary procedures as well as information regarding risks together with benefits of
participation. Under the terms of participation participants need the legal right to leave research
at any time without facing consequences.
Researchers need to implement security procedures which prevent unapproved persons from
gaining access to EEG data. Researchers need to protect sensitive information through
encryption and password security and multiple protective methods.
Limitations
The spatial localization abilities of EEG remain inferior to fMRI and other methods because it
provides low resolution. Consequently brain activity location identification becomes difficult
which restricts investigation of individual brain areas with precision.
The mobile EEG data demonstrates high vulnerability toward artifacts as an essential limitation
of its operation. The sensitivity of mobile EEG to artifacts restricts possible research topics
because investigators must thoroughly handle confounding influences.
Comparison with Traditional Approaches in Psychology
The technology of mobile EEG brings numerous benefits compared to standard laboratory EEG
testing yet generates specific drawbacks during use.
Advantages
The ecological validity of testing with mobile EEG surpasses traditional EEG systems because
researchers can study brain functions during natural real-life circumstances. The study of
behaviors affected by environmental elements requires this approach since it provides essential
understanding.
Time-sensitive brain analysis becomes achievable through mobile EEG technology whereas
traditional EEG systems do not offer such capabilities. Research scientists can observe cognitive
and emotional processes during their normal progression through real-life settings.
Disadvantages
Mobile EEG data produce lower quality signals than standard EEG due to the presence of
contamination artifacts and environmental interferences. It is necessary to execute precise
preprocessing and analytical techniques for achieving successful results.
Point-to-point brain activity mapping becomes challenging using EEG because the technique
exhibits reduced spatial resolution than fMRI and other neuroimaging techniques available today.
Potential Future Developments in Mobile EEG Research
Mobile EEG continues to evolve at a fast pace because several upcoming developments will
expand its usefulness in psychological research.
Better sensor technology developments would produce more sensitive and precise EEG
recording systems. Such advancements would produce better quality mobile EEG data which
would require less additional artifact correction steps.
AI algorithms have the potential to properly detect and automatically eliminate artifacts which
appear in mobile EEG data. Research becomes less burdensome for scientists while research
findings demonstrate improved reliability when such processing methods are implemented.
Mobile EEG systems can become more valuable through unification with other wearable sensors
such as eye trackers and accelerometers to capture complete cognitive and behavioral states.
Conclusion
Mobile EEG has established itself as an essential psychological research instrument that enable
brain activity monitoring during natural environment investigations. The analytic benefits of
Mobile EEG stem from its placement outside laboratory settings and online brain monitoring
functionalities which render it a vital addition to conventional laboratory EEG. The
advancements in sensor technology combined with artificial intelligence together with
multi-technology integration will increase the usefulness of mobile EEG applications for
psychological research in the future. Mobile EEG technology's ongoing improvement suggests it
will establish a greater role in advancing research about the human brain.
References
● Allen, J. J. B., Urry, H. L., Hitt, S. K., & Coan, J. A. (2007). The stability of frontal
electroencephalographic asymmetry as an index of affective style. Psychophysiology,
44(5), 740-747.
● Aricò, P., Borghini, G., Di Flumeri, G., সময়ে, P., & Babiloni, F. (2017). Passive BCI beyond
the lab: Usability of EEG technology in real-world experiments. Brain-Computer
Interfaces, 4(2), 77-93.
● Ayaz, H., Shewokis, P. A., Curtin, A., Izzetoglu, M., Izzetoglu, K., & Onaral, B. (2013).
Using portable fNIRS to assess cognitive workload during air traffic control tasks.
Behavior Research Methods, 45(1), 152-161.
● Berka, C., Levendowski, D. J., Lumicao, M. N., Yau, A., Davis, G., Gray, J., ... & Craven,
P. L. (2004). EEG correlates of task engagement and mental workload vary with
intelligence, motivation, strategy, and effort. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 167-187.
● Bevilacqua, R., Vecchiato, G., সময়ে, P., & Babiloni, F. (2019). Neurophysiological
correlates of social interaction: A systematic review. Social Neuroscience, 14(3),
239-254.
● Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature
and design. Harvard University Press.
● Chang, C. Y., Hsu, S. H., Ko, L. W., Lin, C. T., & Jung, T. P. (2020). Automatic artifact
removal for mobile EEG using deep learning. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering, 67(5), 1295-1305.
● Cognionics. (2023). Cognionics product information. Retrieved from [Cognionics official
website]
● Debener, S., Minow, F., Emkes, R., Gandras, K., & de Vos, M. (2012). How about taking
a low-cost, small mobile EEG for a walk? NeuroImage, 62(1), 571-580.
● Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of
single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of
Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
● Dumas, G., Nadel, J., Soussignan, R., Martinerie, J., & Garnero, L. (2010). Inter-brain
synchronization during social interaction. PLoS ONE, 5(8), e12166.
● Fairclough, S. H., & Venables, L. (2016). EEG markers of mental workload during
simulated driving. Ergonomics, 59(3), 393-402.
● Gramann, K., Jung, T. P., Ferris, D. P., Lin, C. T., & Makeig, S. (2014). Toward a new
cognitive neuroscience using real-world electroencephalography. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 8, 1-13.
● Hari, R., Parkkonen, L., & স্থান, V. (2015). Brain basis of social interaction: from concepts
to brain imaging. Physiological Reviews, 95(4), 1295-1336.
● Kappenman, E. S., & Luck, S. J. (2010). The effects of varying the number of trials on
ERP amplitude, latency, and measurement error. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 685-694.
● Lin, C. T., Ko, L. W., Chiang, C. H., Chen, Y. Y., Huang, T. Y., Jung, T. P., & Liang, S. F.
(2010). Wireless and mobile EEG-based drowsiness estimation system. IEEE
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 57(9), 2175-2186.
● Makeig, S., Gramann, K., Jung, T. P., সময়ে, P., Iversen, J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2009).
Mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI) and the natural dynamics of human behavior. IEEE
Pervasive Computing, 8(4), 22-29.
● Mullen, T., Kothe, C., Chi, Y. M., সময়ে, P., Cauwenberghs, G., & Jung, T. P. (2015).
Real-time neuroimaging and cognitive monitoring using wearable dry EEG. IEEE
Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 62(11), 2553-2565.
● Neuroelectrics. (2023). Neuroelectrics product information. Retrieved from
[Neuroelectrics official website]
● Niedermeyer, E., & Lopes da Silva, F. (2011). Electroencephalography: Basic principles,
clinical applications, and related fields. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
● Schmiedt, M. C., Brandi, S. M., Bensch, M., & Gramann, K. (2018). A mobile EEG study
on the influence of urban environments on human relaxation. Scientific Reports, 8(1),
1-12.
● Strehl, U., города, N., Baier, G., & Rosenstiel, W. (2006). Self-regulation of slow cortical
potentials: A new treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Pediatrics, 118(5), e1530-e1540.
● Wascher, E., Schneider, D., Hofmann, M., Wauschkuhn, B., Heuer, K., & Getzmann, S.
(2016). The effects of mobile phone use on attention and working memory performance
are modulated by cognitive demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human
Perception and Performance, 42(5), 754-767.
● Zander, T. O., & Kothe, C. (2011). Towards passive brain-computer interfaces: applying
brain-computer interface technology to human-machine systems in general. Journal of
Neuroscience Methods, 201(2), 237-246.
