Assignment 1 Sameeka Mehboob (33303)
Assignment 1 Sameeka Mehboob (33303)
Assignment # 1
Assignment Topic:
CARBON FIBER
Subject: Advanced Polymer Chemistry
Submitted By:
Sameeka Mehboob
Roll #: 33303
Submitted To:
The origin of carbon fibre lies in the controlled thermal decomposition of specific organic
polymers, which undergo a series of chemical transformations—namely stabilization,
carbonization, and sometimes graphitization—to produce carbon-rich fibrous structures. The
success of this conversion process depends greatly on the chemical nature of the precursor
polymer, which must be rich in carbon content and capable of forming a stable ladder-like or
aromatic structure upon pyrolysis (Liu et al., 2020). The most commonly used precursor
polymers include polyacrylonitrile (PAN), pitch, and rayon, each of which contributes
different physical and chemical characteristics to the final carbon fibre product.
Among these, PAN is the most dominant precursor, accounting for over 90% of the global
carbon fibre production due to its ability to yield high-strength, stable fibres after undergoing
complex thermal reactions (Baker & Rials, 2013). PAN’s linear structure, containing nitrile
groups (–CN), facilitates cyclization and dehydrogenation during heat treatment, enabling the
formation of a thermally stable, conjugated ladder polymer. In contrast, pitch, which is derived
from petroleum or coal tar, is inherently rich in aromatic compounds, and thus provides an ideal
platform for producing high-modulus carbon fibres with highly ordered graphitic structures.
Rayon, a cellulose-based precursor, though less common today due to its lower carbon yield, was
historically significant and is still used for applications requiring high surface area and porosity,
such as in activated carbon fibres (Morgan, 2005).
From a polymer chemistry perspective, the chemical composition, molecular weight, and
functional group distribution of the precursor polymer directly influence the effectiveness of
the carbon fibre formation process. For instance, the presence of polar or reactive groups like
nitriles or hydroxyls aids in stabilizing the polymer during pyrolysis and reduces the formation of
volatile by-products (Liu et al., 2020). Moreover, the polymer's chain alignment and crystallinity
affect the microstructure of the resulting fibre, determining its tensile strength, modulus, and
thermal conductivity.
In conclusion, carbon fibre is not merely a product of physical spinning and heat treatment but is
deeply rooted in the chemistry of the raw polymer. A comprehensive understanding of the
molecular interactions, thermal transformations, and chemical reactivity of precursor
polymers is essential for tailoring the final properties of carbon fibre for specific industrial
applications.
2. Classification and Types of Carbon Fibre Based on
Polymer Precursors
Carbon fibres are categorized based on the type of precursor polymer from which they are
derived. This classification is fundamental because the molecular structure, chemical
composition, and thermal behavior of each polymer precursor determine the physical,
mechanical, and thermal properties of the resulting carbon fibre. The three principal precursor
types used in industrial carbon fibre production are polyacrylonitrile (PAN), pitch, and rayon.
Each of these precursors has a distinct chemical nature and transformation pathway during
carbon fibre fabrication, resulting in unique fibre characteristics and applications (Morgan,
2005).
Polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is the most widely used precursor in carbon fibre manufacturing,
responsible for more than 90% of global production (Baker & Rials, 2013). PAN is a linear
polymer with a repeating unit containing a nitrile group (–CN), which plays a crucial role in fibre
formation. During heat treatment, PAN undergoes cyclization, dehydrogenation, and
oxidation, converting the linear polymer into a highly crosslinked, ladder-like structure. This
stabilized structure is then carbonized at high temperatures (800–1600°C), where non-carbon
atoms are eliminated, leaving behind an ordered carbon matrix.
The superior mechanical properties of PAN-based carbon fibres, including high tensile strength
(up to 5.5 GPa) and moderate modulus (230–300 GPa), stem from the uniform molecular
orientation and stable conjugated structure formed during thermal conversion (Liu et al., 2020).
Because of their strength and versatility, PAN-based fibres are widely used in aerospace,
automotive, construction, and sports equipment.
2.2 Pitch-Based Carbon Fibre
Pitch, a complex mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons derived from petroleum or coal tar, serves
as another significant precursor for carbon fibres. Unlike PAN, pitch has a naturally high carbon
content and contains pre-formed aromatic rings, making it an ideal candidate for producing high-
modulus and high-thermal-conductivity carbon fibres. The pitch is first purified and
isotropized to ensure uniformity, then melt-spun, stabilized, and finally carbonized or
graphitized.
Pitch-based carbon fibres exhibit extremely high modulus (up to 900 GPa) and excellent
thermal conductivity (up to 1000 W/m·K), due to their highly graphitic structure. However,
they typically possess lower tensile strength than PAN-based fibres. These fibres are commonly
used in thermal management systems, spacecraft components, and electrochemical devices,
where stiffness and conductivity are prioritized over tensile strength (Park & He, 2012).
Rayon is a regenerated cellulose polymer derived from natural sources such as wood pulp or
cotton. Historically, rayon was one of the first polymers used for carbon fibre production. During
pyrolysis, the hydroxyl groups (–OH) in cellulose undergo dehydration and aromatization,
forming a porous carbon structure. However, the carbon yield from rayon is relatively low
(~20–25%), and the resulting carbon fibres lack the mechanical strength and modulus of PAN-
or pitch-based fibres (Morgan, 2005).
Despite these limitations, rayon-based carbon fibres are still valuable in activated carbon fibre
(ACF) applications, particularly in air and water filtration, gas adsorption, and biomedical
uses, where high surface area and porosity are more critical than mechanical strength (Baker
& Rials, 2013).
2.4 Comparative Analysis
The table below summarizes the properties and key features of each carbon fibre type based on
their precursor chemistry:
This classification highlights how the chemical backbone and polymer structure of each
precursor determine the performance profile of the resulting carbon fibre. In advanced polymer
chemistry, tailoring these precursors through copolymerization, functionalization, or molecular
design opens avenues for next-generation carbon fibre materials with customizable properties
for specific high-performance applications.
n CH₂=CH–CN → –[CH₂–CH(CN)]–ₙ
This polymerization yields high molecular weight PAN chains, which may be copolymerized
with small amounts of methyl acrylate, itaconic acid, or acrylic acid to enhance solubility,
spinnability, and thermal stability (Liu et al., 2020). These comonomers introduce polar or acidic
groups that improve fibre formation and affect the cyclization kinetics during the stabilization
process.
The nitrile group (–C≡N) plays a central role in PAN’s transformation into carbon fibre. During
thermal treatment, the nitrile groups undergo intramolecular cyclization, dehydrogenation, and
aromatization, forming a thermally stable, conjugated ladder-like structure. This molecular
rearrangement is the backbone for achieving high carbon yields and graphitic microstructures
(Morgan, 2005).
The first and most critical chemical transformation in PAN-based carbon fibre production is
oxidative stabilization, conducted in air at 200–300 °C. In this step, the nitrile groups (-C≡N)
undergo cyclization to form fused-ring structures, converting the linear PAN into a ladder
polymer with enhanced thermal stability. This reaction is exothermic and requires careful
control to avoid fibre degradation.
–CH₂–CH(CN)– → –CH=CH–C=N–C=N–CH=CH–
Additionally, oxidation reactions introduce ketone and carboxylic acid groups, improving the
rigidity and resistance to melting. Simultaneously, dehydrogenation removes hydrogen atoms
and promotes cross-linking. The resulting stabilized polymer becomes infusible and highly
resistant to thermal degradation (Fitzer et al., 1986).
3.3 Carbonization: Formation of Graphitic Carbon Structures
Chemically, carbonization results in the conversion of the ladder polymer into a turbostratic
carbon structure—layers of graphene-like sheets without perfect stacking. The degree of order
depends on temperature and time. If processed above 2000°C, graphitization can occur, further
aligning the layers into true graphite-like crystallites, increasing modulus but reducing strength
due to brittleness (Morgan, 2005).
The final carbon fibre thus formed retains much of the alignment and molecular orientation of
the original PAN polymer. Its high degree of orientation and crystallinity is critical for achieving
tensile strengths above 5 GPa and moduli exceeding 300 GPa (Liu et al., 2020).
The chemical behavior of PAN can be finely tuned through copolymerization with comonomers
like itaconic acid, methyl methacrylate, and vinyl acetate, which influence the cyclization
temperature, improve processing conditions, and reduce exothermicity. For example, itaconic
acid introduces carboxylic acid groups that catalyze cyclization and enhance oxidative
stabilization (Wiles & Scott, 2006).
Pitch consists of a polydisperse mix of molecules with molecular weights ranging from a few
hundred to several thousand Daltons. Its structure includes:
Raw pitch is chemically unstable and unsuitable for fibre spinning. Therefore, it undergoes
purification and polymer modification, known as isotropization, to remove volatiles and
increase softening point and molecular uniformity. For high-performance applications,
mesophase pitch is used—a highly ordered liquid crystalline form of pitch with discotic nematic
alignment that enhances molecular orientation (Fitzer et al., 1995).
Pitch fibres are produced through melt spinning, followed by oxidative stabilization in air at 200–
300°C. During stabilization:
The stabilized pitch is then carbonized at 1000–1500°C under inert atmosphere. Due to its
aromatic-rich backbone, pitch carbonizes with high yield and easily forms highly graphitic
domains. At above 2500°C, graphitization yields near-single-crystal graphite, providing
moduli up to 900 GPa and thermal conductivities over 1000 W/m·K (Park & He, 2012).
The repeating unit in cellulose (and hence rayon) is anhydroglucose, with the molecular formula
(C₆H₁₀O₅)ₙ. Each glucose unit contains:
Rayon fibres are spun from viscose solution and solidified into regenerated cellulose, retaining
the high –OH content, which is key to subsequent thermal reactions
.
4.2.2 Thermal Chemistry During Fibre Conversion
The transformation of rayon to carbon fibre involves pyrolysis in multiple stages, typically:
1. Dehydration (200–300°C):
Hydroxyl groups (-OH) are removed, forming water and initiating ring opening and
rearrangement reactions. This results in intermediate furans, aldehydes, and
aromatics.
2. Volatilization and carbon formation (300–1000°C):
Cellulose chains break down, releasing gases such as CO, CO₂, CH₄, and H₂O.
Simultaneously, aromatic ring systems form, which fuse into amorphous carbon.
3. Carbonization (above 1000°C):
Further rearrangement leads to a turbostratic carbon structure, though with less order
compared to PAN or pitch fibres.
The final product has low graphitization and poor tensile properties. However, it has
exceptional porosity and surface area, making it suitable for activated carbon fibres used in
adsorption, filtration, and catalysis (Baker & Rials, 2013).
This comparative analysis highlights how the polymer chemistry and thermal reactivity of
each precursor governs the microstructural evolution, carbon yield, and final fibre
performance. While PAN provides a balance of strength and process control, pitch offers
superior thermal and modulus characteristics, and rayon enables cost-effective production of
porous carbon structures.
5. Stabilization Process – Chemistry and Mechanism
The stabilization process is a critical intermediate step in the production of carbon fibres,
particularly from polyacrylonitrile (PAN) precursors. It involves controlled thermal oxidation
of the polymer in air at temperatures ranging from 200°C to 300°C, during which the
thermoplastic PAN fibre becomes thermoset and chemically cross-linked. This transformation
ensures that the fibre retains its structural integrity during subsequent carbonization at high
temperatures, preventing melting or fusion. The stabilization process is heavily dependent on
the underlying polymer chemistry, and its mechanism is complex and multi-staged, involving
several simultaneous reactions such as cyclization, dehydrogenation, oxidation, and cross-
linking.
This cyclization transforms the linear PAN chain into a ladder polymer, which is more
thermally stable and resistant to melting. The formation of six-membered rings (often aromatic
or pseudo-aromatic in nature) gives the fibre the rigidity needed for high-temperature
carbonization (Rahaman et al., 2007).
5.1.2 Dehydrogenation
The stabilization process is conducted in air, enabling oxidative reactions. Oxygen molecules
diffuse into the fibre and react with various reactive sites:
These oxidation steps promote inter-chain cross-linking, thereby "locking" the molecular
arrangement and making the fibre infusible. Additionally, oxidation introduces heteroatoms
(mainly O), which are partially removed during carbonization but temporarily contribute to
dimensional stability.
The kinetics of stabilization must be carefully controlled because the cyclization reaction is
highly exothermic. If the heat is not dissipated uniformly, local overheating can occur, leading
to fiber fusion or surface defects. The rate and depth of stabilization depend on several factors:
As a result of the stabilization process, several important structural modifications occur in the
PAN fibre:
• The colour of the fibre changes from white to yellow to brown, indicating increasing
cyclization and oxidation.
• The polymer loses its thermoplasticity, becoming rigid and insoluble.
• The fibre's density increases (from ~1.18 to 1.35 g/cm³).
• New aromatic-like conjugated structures form, setting the stage for graphitic
development during carbonization.
Stabilized PAN fibres contain a partially aromatized, cross-linked structure that is crucial for
producing high-strength carbon fibres with good carbon yield (~55%). If stabilization is
incomplete or uneven, the carbonization step may produce defective or brittle fibres.
During carbonization, several concurrent pyrolytic reactions take place. These are non-
oxidative decomposition reactions, meaning they occur in the absence of oxygen to prevent
combustion or oxidation of carbon.
The stabilized PAN structure, which contains nitrile rings, oxidized groups (C=O, –COOH), and
other heteroatoms, undergoes further chemical decomposition:
These reactions lead to a significant weight loss (~40–50%) and a gradual enrichment of carbon
content:
The precise decomposition products depend on the stabilization quality and comonomers used in
the PAN precursor.
As heteroatoms are removed, the carbon atoms in the fibre begin to rearrange and form
aromatic and graphitic domains. This rearrangement leads to a progressive transformation of
the disordered carbon into sp² hybridized planar structures (graphene-like sheets). These
planes begin to stack and align in a turbostratic arrangement, which is a partially ordered
structure with short-range graphitic order but misaligned layers due to defects or curvature.
1. Amorphous carbon →
2. Aromatic clusters →
3. Layered graphitic sheets (partial ordering)
This transformation is crucial for imparting mechanical strength and stiffness to carbon fibres,
as the aligned graphitic planes efficiently distribute load along the fibre axis.
The structural evolution during carbonization results in the following significant changes:
• Increased Carbon Content: Rises from ~55–60% (in stabilized fibres) to >90% after
carbonization.
• Graphitic Domain Formation: Random carbon atoms start to arrange into graphene-
like sheets.
• Fibre Shrinkage and Densification: The fibre shrinks slightly (~5–10%) but becomes
denser and more oriented.
• Loss of Voids and Amorphous Regions: Non-crystalline regions are eliminated, and the
fibre becomes more uniform.
The interlayer spacing between carbon planes (d₀₀₂ spacing) decreases, approaching the ideal
graphite value of ~0.335 nm, although complete graphitization requires even higher temperatures
(>2500°C).
To ensure high-quality carbon fibres, the carbonization process is carefully controlled using
multi-zone furnaces with gradual heating profiles. Key process parameters include:
Controlling these parameters ensures uniform carbonization, which is critical for optimizing
tensile strength and modulus.
These carbonized fibres are typically termed as carbon fibres (not yet graphite fibres), with a
balance of high tensile strength (~3–5 GPa) and moderate modulus (200–300 GPa), making
them ideal for aerospace and structural composites.
6.5 Chemical Structure Before and After
Stage Structure
Stabilized PAN Ladder polymer with heteroatoms (N, O, H)
Carbonized Fibre Disordered/partially ordered aromatic carbon with high carbon content
The graphitization process is not necessary for all carbon fibre grades. It is primarily used for
producing:
Graphitization involves solid-state transformation rather than any further chemical reaction.
However, important microstructural evolution takes place due to atomic rearrangement:
• The carbon content may rise slightly (from ~92–94% to >99%) due to removal of
residual heteroatoms.
• Fibre density increases, which correlates with improved modulus.
Note: Special graphite furnaces made of graphite insulation and graphite electrodes are used
due to the extreme temperatures involved.
Property Effect
Modulus (Stiffness) Increases up to 900 GPa (almost triple that of carbonized fibres)
Thermal Conductivity Improves due to graphitic structure (~500 W/m·K or higher)
Electrical Conductivity Approaches values close to pure graphite
• High tensile strength (found in carbonized fibres) tends to decrease because high-
temperature treatment induces microcracks, grain boundary growth, and loss of
flexibility.
• In contrast, modulus increases sharply due to improved atomic alignment and graphitic
ordering.
Thus, fibres for structural composites (like aircraft) often use intermediate or high-modulus
carbon fibres, not ultra-high modulus ones, to maintain strength.
Before Graphitization:
| | | | |
Disordered, misaligned layers
(turbostratic structure)
After Graphitization:
||||||||||||||||||||
Highly ordered, aligned graphene sheets
(crystalline graphite-like structure)
8. Surface Treatment and Sizing – Interfacial Compatibility
Carbon fibres possess exceptional mechanical properties like high tensile strength and stiffness.
However, their inert surface, poor wettability, and low chemical reactivity create a major
issue when bonding with matrices (especially in composites like epoxy resins). To resolve this,
surface treatment and sizing processes are conducted to enhance fibre–matrix adhesion,
increase interfacial shear strength, and protect the fibres during handling.
These processes play a crucial role in determining the overall performance of carbon fibre-
reinforced composites (CFRCs).
Surface treatment creates functional groups (like –COOH, –OH, –C=O) on the fibre surface,
enabling chemical bonding or mechanical interlocking with the matrix.
There are two primary types of surface treatments applied to carbon fibres:
This is the most common method and involves oxidizing the surface using chemicals or
electrochemical processes.
• Uses nitric acid, chromic acid, or ozone to oxidize the fibre surface.
• Generates carboxylic acid (-COOH), hydroxyl (-OH), and carbonyl (C=O) groups.
Example Reaction:
Involves exposing fibres to a plasma discharge (O₂, N₂, Ar) in vacuum. It modifies the top few
nanometers of the surface without affecting bulk properties.
Advantages:
• No chemicals used
• Very uniform treatment
• Preserves tensile strength
Sizing is the application of a very thin polymeric coating (0.5–2% by weight) onto the treated
carbon fibre. It serves multiple functions:
The sizing chemistry is tailored to match the matrix resin used in the final composite.
Carbonized Fibre
↓
Electrochemical/Plasma Oxidation
↓
Surface Rinsing & Drying
↓
Sizing Application (spray or immersion)
↓
Drying/Curing
↓
Winding & Packaging
Each step is optimized for uniformity, adhesion, and preservation of mechanical properties.
Interfacial Shear Strength Functional groups improve chemical bonding with matrix
Carbon fibres are not purely graphitic. Instead, they exhibit a turbostratic structure — a
disordered stacking of graphene-like layers. The structure varies based on the precursor material
and processing temperatures:
Carbon fibres are well-known for their exceptional mechanical performance, particularly in
tensile strength and modulus.
• High tensile strength arises from aligned polymer chains and strong covalent bonds
(C–C).
• High modulus is due to graphitic crystallites aligned along the fibre axis.
• Low strain to failure indicates brittle fracture, common in highly ordered materials.
Carbon fibres exhibit excellent thermal resistance and stability, owing to their carbon-rich,
aromatic structure.
Property Value/Range
Note:
Carbon fibres are electrically conductive due to the presence of delocalized π-electrons in the
graphene-like structure.
Parameter Value/Range
Carbon fibres are chemically inert, especially in acidic and alkaline environments.
However, under oxidizing conditions at high temperatures (>400°C in air), they begin
to degrade:
C+O2→CO2↑
To improve long-term environmental resistance, sizing agents and coatings are often used.
Carbon fibre shows extremely high tensile strength, typically ranging from 3.5 to 7.0 GPa,
depending on the fibre type and processing conditions.
Carbon fibres possess high Young’s modulus, ranging from 230 to 900 GPa depending on
whether they are high-strength (HS), intermediate modulus (IM), or high modulus (HM) fibres.
Carbon fibres have a density of about 1.75 to 2.0 g/cm³, making them much lighter than metals
like aluminum (2.7 g/cm³) and steel (7.8 g/cm³).
Carbon fibre can withstand extremely high temperatures (up to 3000°C) in inert environments.
Carbon fibres are highly resistant to acids, solvents, and corrosive environments.
Carbon fibre composites demonstrate excellent fatigue resistance, retaining strength over
repeated loading cycles.
• Comparison: Performs better than steel and aluminum under cyclic loading.
• Applications: Aircraft wings, wind turbine blades, and sporting goods.
10.8 Dimensional Stability
Carbon fibre does not significantly expand or contract with temperature changes due to its low
coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE).
Although inherently stiff, carbon fibre composites can be engineered to absorb and dampen
vibrations when combined with suitable matrix materials.
Anisotropy:
• Properties vary with direction (strong along fibre axis, weaker perpendicular).
• Design advantage: Can be engineered to meet specific load conditions.
Carbon fibre composites are extensively used in aerospace structures, replacing metals like
aluminum and titanium due to superior strength-to-weight ratio.
Applications include:
• Aircraft fuselage, wings, and tail sections (e.g., Boeing 787 contains ~50% CFRP)
• Satellite structures and components
Benefits:
In modern high-performance and electric vehicles, CFRPs are used for weight reduction
without compromising safety and strength.
Applications include:
Benefits:
Carbon fibres offer lightweight and durable solutions in sports gear, enhancing performance
and comfort.
Applications include:
CFRPs are increasingly applied in construction for structural rehabilitation and new design
innovations.
Applications include:
Benefits:
Carbon fibre plays a vital role in wind energy and energy storage systems due to its stiffness
and fatigue resistance.
Applications include:
Carbon fibre’s electrical conductivity makes it suitable for electromagnetic shielding and
lightweight casings.
Applications include:
Due to biocompatibility, strength, and customizability, carbon fibre is increasingly used in the
biomedical field.
Applications include:
CFRPs are widely used in defense applications where high strength, stealth, and durability are
required.
Applications include:
Carbon fibres are increasingly used in boats and marine structures due to corrosion resistance
and lightness.
Applications include:
Despite its advantages, the cost of carbon fibre remains a significant barrier to widespread
adoption, especially in mass-market sectors like construction and automotive.
• Raw material (precursor) cost: PAN accounts for nearly 50% of production cost.
• Process energy cost: Electricity and fuel for thermal treatment is expensive.
• Production yield: Conversion efficiency from PAN to carbon fibre is ~50%.
• Labour and facility costs: Specialized facilities and equipment increase capital
investment.
Recycling is essential to improve the sustainability and economics of carbon fibre use,
especially in aerospace and automotive sectors, where end-of-life management is increasingly
regulated.
Recycling Methods:
• Can be reused in non-structural parts, such as battery trays, interiors, and filler
components.
• Ongoing efforts focus on retaining fibre orientation and minimizing damage during
recycling.
Green Approaches:
• Bio-based PAN: Derived from renewable acrylonitrile sources (e.g., from biomass)
• Lignin-based carbon fibre: A renewable, low-cost precursor from wood and plant
material
• Improved energy recovery: Using waste heat or microwave processing for
carbonization
• Closed-loop recycling: Integrating manufacturing scrap reuse into fibre production
Industry Initiatives:
• EU Horizon 2020 and DOE (USA) are funding projects to reduce carbon fibre cost by
50% and emissions by 60%.
• Life Cycle Assessments (LCAs) help industries benchmark environmental performance
and guide improvements.
12.5 Economic and Environmental Trade-offs
While carbon fibres reduce fuel usage, emissions, and maintenance in end-use products (e.g., in
planes and cars), their initial footprint is significant. Trade-offs must be carefully balanced:
The precursor polymer defines the structure, cost, and environmental footprint of the resulting
carbon fibre. Recent research has introduced alternative precursors to replace conventional
PAN and pitch.
Reference: Baker, D. A., & Rials, T. G. (2013). Recent advances in low-cost carbon fiber
manufacture from lignin. Journal of Materials Science, 48(1), 184–195.
b. Bio-Based PAN
Benefits:
Applications:
Example: CNT-reinforced PAN fibres show 25–50% improvement in tensile properties after
carbonization (Kim et al., 2017).
New processing methods aim to reduce energy consumption and cycle time during stabilisation
and carbonisation.
a. Microwave-Assisted Stabilization
b. Plasma Carbonization
Conventional CFRPs use thermosetting resins, which are hard to recycle. Recent innovations
are introducing thermoplastic matrices (like PEEK, PEI) and reversible thermosets.
Advantages:
Functional carbon fibres are now being developed with embedded sensing, actuation, or
energy storage capabilities.
Smart Functions:
Example: Researchers have developed carbon fibres that double as battery electrodes,
contributing to ―massless energy storage.‖
Advances in 3D printing now allow integration of continuous carbon fibre into thermoplastic
matrices during printing.
Benefits:
Companies involved:
The use of machine learning and simulation tools is transforming carbon fibre production and
composite design.
Applications:
• Bio-based acrylonitrile and lignin are expected to replace petroleum-derived PAN in the
long term, significantly reducing environmental impact and cost.
• Research into hybrid precursors that combine synthetic and bio-based polymers is
ongoing to achieve high performance with sustainability.
• Automated production lines using Industry 4.0 principles (sensors, robotics, AI) will
allow high-volume, consistent-quality carbon fibre production.
• This will enable penetration into mass-market applications, such as automotive,
construction, and renewable energy components.
• Carbon fibres with embedded sensors, self-healing, or energy storage capabilities are
in early development.
• These smart composites will serve dual roles, such as structural support and real-time
monitoring, in aerospace and military systems.
e. Recyclability and Circular Economy Integration
• More efficient chemical recycling methods are being developed to recover high-quality
fibres from composites.
• Integration of recycled fibres into low-cost consumer goods will expand the carbon fibre
market while reducing landfill burden.
The role of carbon fiber in high-end applications such as aerospace, automotive, construction,
sports equipment, and renewable energy sectors (like wind turbine blades) continues to grow,
driven by its superior strength-to-weight ratio. Moreover, ongoing efforts in recycling
technologies and life-cycle analysis are critical for addressing the environmental concerns
associated with carbon fiber waste and contributing to circular economy models.
In conclusion, carbon fiber represents a crucial material in modern material science and
engineering, offering a blend of strength, versatility, and performance. However, challenges
remain in terms of cost-effective production, environmental sustainability, and scalability. Future
progress in precursor development, energy-efficient processing, composite recycling, and
application-specific customization will determine the trajectory of carbon fiber technology in
industrial and research contexts. The field remains vibrant with innovation, and the outlook for
carbon fiber as a next-generation material is promising.
References:
• Bai, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). Emerging applications of carbon fibre composites.
Advanced Materials Research, 1189, 15–28.
• Baker, D. A., & Rials, T. G. (2013). Recent advances in low-cost carbon fiber
manufacture from lignin. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 130(4), 2325–2331.
• Baker, D. A., & Rials, T. G. (2013). Lignin-based carbon fiber: Current challenges and
future prospects. Journal of Materials Science, 48(1), 184–195.
• Bashir, Z. (1991). Chemical and structural aspects of the stabilization of PAN precursor
fibres. Carbon, 29(8), 1081–1090.
• Campbell, F. C. (2010). Structural composite materials. ASM International.
• Das, S. (2011). Life cycle assessment of carbon fiber-reinforced composites.
International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16(3), 268–282.
• Diefendorf, R. J., & Tokarsky, E. W. (1980). Structure and properties of high-modulus
carbon fibers. Carbon, 18(4), 265–273.
• Diefendorf, R. J., & Tokarsky, E. W. (1980). The role of surface treatment in the
performance of carbon fibre composites. Carbon, 18(5), 317–325.
• Donnet, J. B., Bansal, R. C., & Wang, M. J. (1998). Carbon fibers (3rd ed.). Marcel
Dekker.
• Fitzer, E., & Frohs, W. (1987). Influence of processing parameters on structure and
properties of PAN-based carbon fibres. Carbon, 25(2), 163–169.
• Fitzer, E., & Heine, M. (1986). The influence of chemical structure on the properties of
carbon fibres. Carbon, 24(4), 389–398.
• Fitzer, E., Frohs, W., & Heine, M. (1986). Optimization of stabilization and
carbonization treatment of PAN fibres and structural characterization of the resulting
carbon fibres. Carbon, 24(4), 387–395.
• Fitzer, E., Muller, K., & Schacher, A. (1995). The influence of chemical structure of
pitch and PAN precursors on the carbonisation process. Carbon, 33(4), 587–599.
• Gupta, A., & Harrison, I. R. (1996). New aspects in the oxidative stabilization of PAN-
based carbon fibres. Carbon, 34(11), 1427–1433.
• Johnson, W., & Watt, W. (1983). The carbonization and graphitization of PAN-based
fibres. Journal of Materials Science, 18(3), 683–692.
• Kim, H. S., et al. (2017). Nanomaterial-enhanced carbon fibers. Advanced Materials,
29(10), 1603890.
• Kumar, A., & Dixit, A. R. (2014). A review on the mechanical properties of carbon fiber
reinforced polymer composites. Materials Today: Proceedings, 1(1), 396–403.
• Liu, W., Zhang, Y., Wu, S., & Wang, Y. (2020). Recent advances in carbon fiber
precursors and conversion. Carbon, 156, 456–478.
• Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Microwave-assisted processing of carbon fibres: A review.
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 134, 105915.
• Liu, Y., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2020). Sustainable strategies for carbon fibre
composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 182, 107655.
• Mallick, P. K. (2007). Fiber-reinforced composites: Materials, manufacturing, and
design (3rd ed.). CRC Press.
• Morgan, P. (2005). Carbon fibers and their composites. CRC Press.
• Oliveux, G., Dandy, L. O., & Leeke, G. A. (2015). Current status of recycling of fibre
reinforced polymers: Review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. Progress in
Materials Science, 72, 61–99.
• Park, S. J., & He, P. J. (2012). Effect of precursor type and process condition on pitch-
based carbon fibers. Journal of Materials Science, 47(4), 1453–1462.
• Park, S. J., & Heo, G. Y. (2003). Effect of crystallite size on the physical properties of
carbon fibres. Journal of Materials Science, 38(19), 3937–3941.
• Park, S. J., & Seo, M. K. (2011). Carbon fiber composites. Springer.
• Pickering, S. J. (2006). Recycling technologies for thermoset composite materials.
Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37(8), 1206–1215.
• Pickering, S. J. (2020). Advances in recycling of fibre-reinforced composites. Journal of
Composite Materials, 54(1), 25–38.
• Rahaman, M. S. A., Ismail, A. F., & Mustafa, A. (2007). A review of heat treatment on
polyacrylonitrile fiber. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 92(8), 1421–1432.
• Wiles, D. M., & Scott, G. (2006). Polyacrylonitrile copolymers for carbon fibre: Role of
itaconic acid. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 91(7), 1591–1603.
• Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2012). PAN-based carbon fiber stabilization process:
Kinetics and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 125(6), 4445–4451.
• Xu, H., & Gao, L. (2017). Surface treatment and sizing of carbon fibres. Composites
Science and Technology, 145, 1–10.
• Yang, Y., Boom, R., Irion, B., van Heerden, D.-J., Kuiper, P., & de Wit, H. (2012).
Recycling of composite materials. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process
Intensification, 51, 53–68.