Class Code: Z1217 Participant: Mohammed

Khan
Marker: BS
Significant Excellent
Feedback Level/ General Satisfactory Good Very Good Exceptional 84-100
Improvement Required 72-78 (lower
Criteria 42-48 (pass) 52-58 (lower merit) 62-68 (higher merit) (higher distinction) Mark
0-38% (fail) distinction)
Element and weighting Individual elements (individual elements – grade awarded to individuals presentation/ report section (70%))
1. Demonstrates 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
understanding of Individual section does Individual section is Individual section Individual section Individual section offers Individual section
appropriate not identify concepts or missing concepts/ demonstrates presents a very good an excellent presents an
concepts & frameworks and/or framework components understanding of understanding of understanding of outstanding
frameworks offers unsatisfactory and/or does not fully concepts and concepts and appropriate concepts understanding of
introduced during 30% definition or meet requirements. It frameworks. Definition/ frameworks. Relevant and frameworks, with a relevant concepts and 55
the course through explanation. Poor presents (in)adequate explanation is concepts are presented wide(r) range of frameworks.
definition and reference to academic information from adequate, with some well with reference relevant and key Exceptional sourcing
explanation of sources. relevant sources relevant sources cited given to (a range of) academic sources. and evidence of
relevant concepts & presenting limited (limited). academic sources. reading, drawing from a
reference to key points. wide range of sources.
academic sources.
2. Applies 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
appropriate A minimal An adequate A good application of The presented work Excellent application of Exceptional
concepts & demonstration of demonstration of relevant concepts and offers a very good appropriate concepts & demonstration of the
frameworks to the application to the case application of frameworks, perhaps application of frameworks to the application of theory
analysis of the case 20% organization. concept(s) and with some critical appropriate concepts & analysis of the case (concepts/ framework) 58
study Application lacks depth framework(s) to the perspectives offered in frameworks to the study. Presentation to practice (case).
and/ or clarity. case organization. The the context of the case analysis of the case offers in-depth and
work undertaken may organization. study. Application has clear understanding/
lack depth. some depth. application.
3. Supports the 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
analysis through Offers minimal evidence A satisfactory Section offers good use Very good use of Excellent work. Strong Exceptional evidence of
reference to and/ or facts/ data presentation of facts/ of evidence or facts evidence or facts drawn research undertaken to collating and employing
evidence and facts pertaining to the case evidence of the case. drawn from the case from the case offer well-researched evidence and facts/
drawn from the case 10% organization. Limited The use of this/ these to organization to support organization to support evidence and facts. data to support 62
study evidence of case support analysis is analysis. Evidence of analysis. There is clear This, in turn, is analysis.
organization research. limited in depth and/or good case research. evidence of indepth employed to support
relevance. Evidence of research into the case analysis.
some case research. organization.
Feedback Level/ General Significant Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent Exceptional
Criteria Improvement Required
4. Demonstrates 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
good presentation Significant issues in Satisfactory The work presented is Very good presentation Excellent approach to Exceptional
and communication terms of presentation presentation and of a good standard in and communication presentation and presentation and
skills including verbal and communication. communication skills. terms of presentation skills. You have spent communication. Well communication skills,
and written delivery; This may include some There may be some and communication. time considering how considered viual with outstanding written
timing; clarity of of the following: poor issues in terms of You demonstrated best to present your representation, with and verbal delivery.
explanations; design 10% clarity of explanations, clarity, timing and some skills in terms of research (academic excellent use space Work has excellent 52
look and feel; and poor, planning and delivery (among others) clarity of explanation, and case) and and time. clarity and design.
the visual delivery and inadequate but the work presented design, presentation of application.
representation of the verbal and/ or written is at a satisfactory the information (among
information delivery. There may be standard. others)
unprofessionalism.

Element and weighting Group elements (overall grade awarded to group members) - 30%
5. Describes the 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
context of the case
Satisfactory case
by providing the Good level of Background and factual Excellent case context Exceptional
context offered, with a
background and Background on case is background provided. information on the case offered. The introductory case
reasonable
basic factual very weak and offers a The context of the case offers a very good background of the case overview, with
10% background. The work 55
information. poor case introduction provides a good context for the case, organisation is succint consideration given to
may have limited depth/
to the remainder of the foundation for the and provides a very and provides a relevant its relevance to the rest
may not have relevance
report/ presentation. remainder of the report good foundation for the overview (relevant to of of the report/ video
to the rest of
and presentation. remainder of the report. the assignment). presentation.
assignment.

6. Includes an 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
introduction which
An adequate The presented work The introduction
summarises the key A good introduction is An exceptional, well
Poor introduction introduction is provided offers a very good provided is excellent: it
theme/line of provided, offering a structured introducation
offered, with no (or with some of the introduction which provides indepth and
argument of the sound summary of the which clearly sets out
10% very limited) focus on following criteria provides some detail on clear detail on themes/ 55
group presentation report/video theme and key themes/ argument
themes or line of (partially) met: the key theme/ arguments and a very
and the structure/ a good overview of and offers a succint
argument in report and/ summary of theme, line argument and a very strong descrition of
content of the group content, structure and overview of content and
or video. of argument, structure, good overview of the content and
presentation line of argument. structure
content of report/ video structure and content. presentation.
Feedback Level/ General Significant Satisfactory Good Very good Excellent Exceptional
Criteria Improvement Required
7. Includes a 10 20 35 42 45 48 52 55 58 62 65 68 72 75 78 84 92 100
conclusion &
recommendations
that are clearly &
10% 55
logically linked to
each individual
7. Includes a
conclusion & An excellent section, The work submitted is
The conclusions/ The conclusions/ Conclusions and
recommendations with very strong exceptional; both
The report offers no (or recommendations recommendations are recommendations are
that are clearly & conclusions and conclusions and
10% very limited) offered are adequate, good - there is an very good with clear 55
logically linked to recommendations. The recommendations are
conclusions and/ or but further work is attempt to logically link linkages to individual
each individual section is very very well considered,
recommendations. required to link these to content to individual elements. The section is
element. successful in linking with clear and logical
each individual element. elements. well considered.
individual sections. linkages.
Final grade and comments:
Iindividual element: The information you provided is very good but you went above the time limit 13 minutes instead of the 5 minute limit. Sound introduction to
presentation - with good good signposting. The editing of your section is very jumpy. You offer depth of explanation in terms of case-based examples (tending
towards descriptive narratives), but you exceed the time allocation (by some minutes!) and, while there is an indication that you have engaged with the literature,
you don't evidence this well (you reference very few sources in your presentation and written report). You do offer some insightful and considered perspectives.
For future assignments, think about how you can best use the limitations (in terms of word and time limits) to demonstrate depth of understanding and
application.

Group comment: The introduction is missing references and the video quality is poor, lagging at times. The conclusion is well-wrtitten but is not adresssed in full,
only two topics are covered in conclusion. Make sure you do a final check before submission. In the report, there is no overview of content (brief summary of
topics and authors) to signpost your reader.
You provide rationale provided for case selection. This tends towards the decriptive (rather than thematic/ critical) but it is generally good. For future
presentations, think about how you communicate content to engage your audience. Verbatim reading of slides isn't best practice.
There is some repetition in your presentation. In future, consider leaving additional time for peer review/ practice runs to allow for edits.
Additional comment (not considered when marking): for future assignments, please familiarise yourself with correct referencing. There are resources available
through the library to help you with formatting.

56