Scribd
Upload
41 views8 pages

FPGA Design For Embedded Systems - Final Project

The document outlines the final project schedule, organization, and grading criteria for an FPGA Design for Embedded Systems course at the University of Tripoli. Key components include project abstracts, proposal and design presentations, and a final report with strict deadlines and grading rubrics. Grading is divided into project effort, functionality, and innovation, with specific criteria for presentations and reports.

Uploaded by

moxesora
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
41 views8 pages

FPGA Design For Embedded Systems - Final Project

The document outlines the final project schedule, organization, and grading criteria for an FPGA Design for Embedded Systems course at the University of Tripoli. Key components include project abstracts, proposal and design presentations, and a final report with strict deadlines and grading rubrics. Grading is divided into project effort, functionality, and innovation, with specific criteria for presentations and reports.

Uploaded by

moxesora
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Department of Computer Engineering

Faculty of Engineering
University of Tripoli

FPGA Design for Embedded


Systems

Final Project
Schedule, Organization & Grading

1
Final Project: Schedule
• Project Abstract
• Start discussing ideas now with me.
• One page description of the project itself.

• Proposal Conference
• Submit it on-line (MS Teams).

• Block Diagram Conference


• Review major components and overall design approach.

• Project Design Presentation to class


• Each student will make a 15-20 min presentation (~15 slides).
• Required attendance.

2
• Final Project Report
• Submit hard copy and soft copy of your final report.
• No late reports will be accepted.

3
Project Grading (70% Total)
• Deadlines and effort (5%)

• Problem Definition and Relevance, Architecture,


Design methodology (30%)
• What is the problem
• Why is it important or interesting
• System architecture and partitioning
• Design choices and principles used
• Style of coding
• All of the above should be stated in the project and report

• Functionality (10%)
• Did you complete what you promised (i.e., graded by the
proposal checklist)

• Contribution, Complexity, Innovation (25%)

4
Presentation & Report Grading (30%)
• Project Proposal (5%)
• Class Presentation (10%)
• Final Report (15% technical)

Required Attendance

5
Final Report Grading Rubric
• For technical grading, we assign a max of 15 points
as follows:
• Technical content of overview/motivation: (0, 1, 2)
• Logical, readable diagrams and timing (if appropriate)
( 0, 1, 2)
• Enough details so the project can be replicated by a fellow
student (0, 2, 4)
• Discussion on methodology/challenges/measurements of
interesting signals and results (if appropriate) (0, 3, 6)
• Lessons learned, advice for the future projects, (0, 0.5, 1)

6
Motivation & Problem Definition
• Does this report sufficiently describe motivation of this
project?

• Does the report clearly define a research problem?

• Does the report adequately describe related work?

• Does the report cite and use appropriate references?

• Does the report clearly & adequately present your research


approach (algorithm description, pseudo code, etc.)?

• Does this report clarify your evaluation’s objectives


(research questions raised by you)?

7
• Does this report concretely describe what can be measured and
compared to existing approaches (if exist) to answer such research
questions?

• Does the report include empirical results that support the


author’s claims/ research goals?

• Does the report suggest future research directions or make


suggestions to improve or augment the current research?

• Did the report demonstrate consideration of alternative


approaches?

• Does the report discuss what they accomplished?

You might also like