COVER PAGE:
DETAILES THAT SHOULD BE INCLUDED:
TITLE OF THE PROJECT(Colonial Forestry and Its
Impact on Forest Dwellers – Then and Now)
NAME OF THE GROUP MEMBERS
CLASS& SECTION
SCHOOL NAME
DATE OF SUBMISSION
INTRODUCTION
India is home to some of the world’s most diverse and extensive forests, ranging from the
lush tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats and Northeast, to the dry deciduous forests of
Central India, and the mangroves of the Sundarbans. These forests are not just rich in
biodiversity, but are also vital for maintaining ecological balance, supporting millions of
livelihoods, and preserving the cultural heritage of numerous indigenous communities.
Forests in India play a crucial role in purifying the air, regulating the climate, conserving soil
and water, and providing habitat for countless species, many of which are found nowhere else
on Earth.
QUOTE:Forests are the lungs of our land, purifying the air and giving fresh strength to our
people.”
— Franklin D. Roosevelt
EXPLOITATION OF FOREST BY
COLONIAL REGIME
Under British colonial rule, Indian forests were systematically classified to facilitate state
control and resource extraction. The Indian Forest Act, particularly its 1927 version,
established three main categories:
Reserved Forests: These were the most strictly controlled. The government had exclusive
rights over these forests, and local people were largely prohibited from using forest
resources without official permission. Reserved forests were typically rich, compact
areas chosen for their commercial value, especially for timber extraction127.
Protected Forests: These forests were also under government control, but with less
stringent restrictions compared to reserved forests. Some traditional rights of local
people were acknowledged, but these could be revoked at the government's discretion.
The state could regulate or prohibit activities such as tree felling, hunting, or grazing as
needed127.
Village Forests: In this category, certain rights of management and use were granted to
village communities. However, this provision was rarely implemented due to distrust
among villagers and the complexities of the process.
The primary motivations for British control and exploitation of Indian forests were:
Timber for Railways and Ships: The rapid expansion of the railway network after 1853 and
the needs of the British Royal Navy created a massive demand for durable timber,
especially for railway sleepers and shipbuilding. Indian species like sal and deodar were
highly valued for their strength and resistance to rot, making them ideal for these
purposes45.
Export and Revenue: Forest resources, including timber and minor produce like lac and
resin, became significant sources of export and colonial revenue. The British established
contracts and leases with local rulers and private agencies to maximize profits from
forest exploitation, integrating local economies into the global capitalist system.
INTORDUCTION TO INDIAN
FOREST ACT
To formalize and expand state control, the British enacted
a series of forest laws:
Indian Forest Act, 1865: This was the first law that
allowed the government to declare any land as
"Government Forest" and regulate its use, restricting
traditional rights without providing a clear definition of
"forest".
Indian Forest Act, 1878: This act consolidated British
control, introducing the classification of forests into
reserved, protected, and village categories. It enabled
the conversion of protected forests into reserved
forests and gave forest officials broad discretionary
powers. Customary rights of local people were further
curtailed, reducing them to mere privileges.
Indian Forest Act, 1927: This act further strengthened
the legal framework for forest administration,
maintaining the tripartite classification and reinforcing
state authority over forest resources. It remains the
foundational law for forest governance in India today.
In summary, the colonial classification and exploitation of
Indian forests were driven by the British need for timber
and revenue, and implemented through a series of
increasingly restrictive laws that prioritized imperial
interests over local communities and ecological
sustainability.
IMPACT ON FOREST DEWELLERS
Restrictions on Shifting Cultivation (Jhum)
Colonial forest policies imposed severe restrictions on shifting cultivation (also called jhum
or bewar), a traditional practice vital to many tribal communities such as the Baiga and
Gonds. The British viewed shifting cultivation as destructive to forests and sought to replace
it with settled agriculture, often ignoring its ecological and cultural significance. This led to
the criminalization of shifting cultivation and the loss of a key livelihood for many tribes.
Loss of Rights to Graze, Collect Wood, or Hunt
Customary rights to graze cattle, collect firewood, hunt, and gather forest produce were
systematically curtailed or banned under new forest laws. Large areas were declared
"reserved" or "protected" forests, making traditional activities illegal. Communities like the
Gonds found themselves unable to graze cattle or hunt, even after fleeing deeper into the
forests, as these lands were now state property.
Forced Labor and Displacement
With their traditional livelihoods criminalized, many forest dwellers were forced to work as
laborers for the forest department or for contractors extracting timber and other resources.
Displacement from ancestral lands left communities impoverished and dependent on wage
labor, fundamentally changing their way of life.
Specific Communities Affected
Baiga: The Baigas of central India, known for bewar (shifting cultivation), faced direct
attempts by the British to settle them as farmers and restrict their forest use. Their
cultural identity, closely tied to the forest, was threatened by these policies3.
Gonds: The Gonds lost their lands to colonial land tenure systems and were pushed
further into forests, only to find those too had become inaccessible. Their traditional
agriculture was made illegal, and they were left in penury4.
Santhals: The Santhals, initially encouraged to clear forests for settled agriculture, later
faced exploitation through debt and lack of protection, leading to widespread hardship
and eventual uprisings
QUOTES:
“When the British came, they took our cattle and fined us for grazing. We could not hunt, we
could not gather wood. We had to work for them, cutting the very trees we once protected.”
— Sita Gond, Gond villager
“Our fathers taught us to move with the forest, to clear a patch, grow our crops, and then let
the land rest. Now, the forest guards say we are thieves in our own home. The forest is no
longer ours—it belongs to the sarkar.”
— Lakhman Baiga, Baiga elder
“
CHANGES IN JAVA DURING
COLONIAL RULE
Dutch Colonial Rule and Forest Policy
During Dutch colonial rule, Java underwent dramatic changes in forest management. The
Dutch introduced scientific forestry and enacted strict forest laws in the 19th century, aiming
to maximize timber extraction—particularly teak, which was highly valued for shipbuilding
and export. These laws banned villagers from entering forests, grazing cattle, collecting wood,
or practicing shifting cultivation without official permission. Violators faced harsh
punishments, further restricting the traditional livelihoods of local communities124.
The Blandongdiensten System: Forced Labor for Logging
To meet the commercial demand for timber, especially teak, the Dutch implemented the
Blandongdiensten system. Initially, rents were imposed on forest land, but exemptions were
granted to villages that supplied free labor and buffaloes for cutting and transporting timber.
Over time, some villagers received small wages instead of rent exemption, but their rights to
cultivate forest land were still denied. This system forced local people to work for the
colonial authorities, often under exploitative conditions, to support the logging
operations134.
Destruction of Forests for Teak Plantations
Large tracts of natural forests were cleared to establish teak plantations, drastically altering
the island’s landscape and ecology. The transformation prioritized commercial interests over
environmental and social concerns, leading to the loss of biodiversity and the displacement
of communities who depended on the forests for their sustenance24.
Resistance by Locals: The Story of Samin’s Movement
Local resistance to Dutch forest policies was significant. One of the most notable movements
was led by Surontiko Samin, a peasant from Randublatung village. Samin challenged the
legitimacy of state ownership over forests, arguing that “the state did not create the wind,
water, earth, and wood, so it could not own them.” The Saminists, his followers, practiced
peaceful resistance by refusing to pay taxes or perform forced labor, and by continuing to use
forest resources despite colonial restrictions. Their movement grew to thousands of
followers, who protested by lying down on their land during surveys, refusing to pay fines,
and rejecting colonial authority
“The wind, the water, the earth, and the wood were not made by the
state. They belong to all of us. How can the Dutch claim them as their
own?”
— Attributed to Surontiko Samin
Why Forest Land Was Brought
Under Cultivation
British Focus on Increasing Agricultural Revenue
During colonial rule, the British administration prioritized maximizing land revenue, which was
a major source of income for the colonial government. They believed that expanding
agricultural land would boost revenue through taxes and help finance the colonial
administration and infrastructure projects.
Forests Seen as “Wasteland” – Cleared for Crops
The British regarded forests as “wastelands” that were unproductive unless converted to
farmland. Large areas of forest were cleared and brought under the plough to grow crops,
especially in regions where the soil was fertile. This process not only generated revenue but
also made land available for European planters and settlers.
Growing Population Pressure and Demand for Cash Crops
As the population grew, so did the demand for food and cash crops like cotton, indigo, tea,
and coffee. The British encouraged the cultivation of these crops for export, further
accelerating the conversion of forests into agricultural land. This led to extensive
deforestation and the loss of traditional forest-based livelihoods.
The ‘Taungya’ System
To facilitate both forestry and agriculture, the British introduced the ‘taungya’ system. Under
this method, forest dwellers were allowed to cultivate crops on cleared patches of forest
land, but only under strict government supervision. After a few years, when the crops were
harvested and the land was ready, tree saplings were planted, and the area was converted
back into forest. While this system provided temporary relief to some forest communities, it
also reinforced government control over both land and people.
Commercial Forestry and
Colonial Economy
Forests Treated as Economic Resources
Under British colonial rule, forests in India were systematically transformed into economic
assets. The colonial administration prioritized the extraction and commercialization of timber
and other forest products, treating forests as commodities to be exploited for profit rather
than as ecosystems supporting local communities128.
Timber as an Export Product
Timber, especially from valuable species like sal and teak, became a major export commodity.
The demand for Indian timber surged in Britain and other parts of the empire, fueling
extensive logging operations and the clearing of large forest tracts for commercial gain127.
Role of Railways – Sleeper Wood from Sal and Teak
The rapid expansion of the Indian railway network after the mid-19th century dramatically
increased the demand for durable timber. Sal and teak were especially prized for making
railway sleepers, which were essential for laying tracks. For example, in the Madras
Presidency alone, tens of thousands of trees were felled to supply the railway industry, and
forests near railway lines disappeared rapidly as a result25.
Government-Created Forest Departments
To manage and regulate this large-scale exploitation, the British established professional
Forest Departments. These departments implemented scientific forestry practices, enforced
new forest laws, and ensured a steady supply of timber for colonial needs. The creation of
Forest Departments also marked the beginning of strict state control over forest resources,
often at the expense of traditional rights and local management systems
NATURAL VEGETATION OF INDIA
AND ASSOCIATED WILDLIFE
Forests Treated as Economic Resources
Under British colonial rule, forests in India were systematically transformed into economic
assets. The colonial administration prioritized the extraction and commercialization of timber
and other forest products, treating forests as commodities to be exploited for profit rather
than as ecosystems supporting local communities128.
Timber as an Export Product
Timber, especially from valuable species like sal and teak, became a major export commodity.
The demand for Indian timber surged in Britain and other parts of the empire, fueling
extensive logging operations and the clearing of large forest tracts for commercial gain127.
Role of Railways – Sleeper Wood from Sal and Teak
The rapid expansion of the Indian railway network after the mid-19th century dramatically
increased the demand for durable timber. Sal and teak were especially prized for making
railway sleepers, which were essential for laying tracks. For example, in the Madras
Presidency alone, tens of thousands of trees were felled to supply the railway industry, and
forests near railway lines disappeared rapidly as a result25.
Government-Created Forest Departments
To manage and regulate this large-scale exploitation, the British established professional
Forest Departments. These departments implemented scientific forestry practices, enforced
new forest laws, and ensured a steady supply of timber for colonial needs. The creation of
Forest Departments also marked the beginning of strict state control over forest resources,
often at the expense of traditional rights and local management systems
Role of Government in Present-Day
Forest & Wildlife Protection
Key Laws and Legal Framework
Wildlife Protection Act (1972): This landmark legislation provides a comprehensive legal
framework for the protection of wildlife, regulation of hunting, and management of
protected areas in India. It empowers authorities to create National Parks, Wildlife
Sanctuaries, Conservation Reserves, and Community Reserves, and prescribes penalties
for wildlife crimes36.
Forest Rights Act (2006): Officially known as the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional
Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, this law recognizes the rights of forest-
dwelling communities to access, manage, and conserve forests, integrating community
participation with biodiversity conservation5.
Protected Areas Network
India has established an extensive network of protected areas to conserve biodiversity:
National Parks: 106
Wildlife Sanctuaries: 573
Conservation Reserves: 115
Community Reserves: 220
As of November 2023, these areas cover about 1,75,169 km², or approximately 5.32% of the
country’s geographical area12.
Role of Forest Departments and NGOs
Forest Departments: State and central forest departments are responsible for enforcing
wildlife and forest laws, managing protected areas, conducting anti-poaching operations,
and implementing conservation projects6.
NGOs: Non-governmental organizations play a crucial role in wildlife rescue, community
engagement, research, advocacy, and awareness campaigns, often working in partnership
with government agencies.
Flagship Conservation Programs
Project Tiger: Launched in 1973, this program focuses on tiger conservation through
habitat management, anti-poaching measures, and community involvement. It has
received increased funding, with ₹290 crore allocated for 2025-2612.
Project Elephant: Initiated in 1992, this project aims to protect elephants and their
habitats, mitigate human-elephant conflict, and promote scientific management1.
Other Initiatives: Programs like Project Dolphin and the Action Plan for Vulture
Conservation address the needs of specific threatened species16.
Recent Policy and Strategic Initiatives
National Wildlife Action Plan (2017–2031): Emphasizes landscape-level conservation,
climate change adaptation, and community participation1.
National Human-Wildlife Conflict Mitigation Strategy: Focuses on reducing conflict while
ensuring both wildlife conservation and human well-being1
Colonial Exploitation vs.
Community Conservation
Movements
Aspect Colonial Present-
Period Day
Control British Governme
Governme nt +
nt Communit
ies
Purpose Timber, Conservati
Profit on,
Livelihood
Local Oppressed Involved
People (e.g., Joint
Forest
Manageme
nt)
Protests Tribal Movement
revolts s like
Chipko,
Appiko
Community participation has emerged as a cornerstone of sustainable forest protection in
India. While colonial forest management prioritized profit and excluded local voices, today’s
conservation efforts increasingly recognize that the knowledge, stewardship, and active
involvement of forest-dependent communities are essential for ecological resilience and
social justice. Movements like Chipko have demonstrated that when local people are
empowered to protect their forests, conservation becomes both effective and enduring256.
Sustainable forest management is only possible when communities are seen not as obstacles,
but as vital partners in safeguarding the future of India’s natural heritage.
ALL THESE PICTURES SHOULD BE
THERE ON THE LEFT SIDE OF
PAGE 11
