Gas Well Deliquification 3rd Edition James F. Lea Download
Gas Well Deliquification 3rd Edition James F. Lea Download
Lea download
[Link]
edition-james-f-lea/
[Link]
james-g-speight/
[Link]
analysis-1st-edition-james-g-speight/
[Link]
dalton-james-f/
[Link]
processing-3rd-edition-arthur-j-kidnay/
Lifestyle medicine, 3rd ed 3rd Edition James M. Rippe
[Link]
edition-james-m-rippe/
[Link]
walter-f-boron/
[Link]
edition-james-f-macnamara-jr/
[Link]
geography-3rd-edition-alan-f-arbogast/
[Link]
communications-1st-edition-gaynor-lea-greenwood/
Gas Well Deliquification
Third Edition
James F. Lea Jr
Consultant, PLTech LLC,
Lubbock, TX, United States
Lynn Rowlan
Engineer, Echometer,
Wichita Falls, TX, United States
Gulf Professional Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford, OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or
mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission in writing from the publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the
Publisher’s permissions policies and our arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance
Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be found at our website: [Link]/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher
(other than as may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden
our understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become
necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and
using any information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or
methods they should be mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom
they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any
liability for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or
otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the
material herein.
ISBN: 978-0-12-815897-5
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Introduction 1
1.2 Multiphase flow in a gas well 2
1.3 Liquid loading 4
1.4 Deliquification techniques 4
1.5 Most used systems for deliquification 5
Reference 6
Further reading 6
3 Critical velocity 25
3.1 Introduction 25
3.2 Critical flow concepts 25
3.2.1 Turner droplet model 26
3.3 Critical velocity at depth 27
3.4 Critical velocity with deviation 34
References 35
Further reading 35
4 Nodal Analysis 37
4.1 Introduction 37
vi Contents
5 Compression 47
5.1 Introduction 47
5.2 Compression horsepower and critical velocity 48
5.3 Systems Nodal Analysis and compression 49
5.4 The effect of permeability on compression 53
5.5 Pressure drop in compression suction 54
5.6 Wellhead versus centralized compression 55
5.7 Developing a compression strategy using Integrated Production
Modeling 55
5.8 Downstream gathering and compression’s effect on uplift from
deliquifying individual gas wells 56
5.9 Compression alone as a form of artificial lift 57
5.10 Compression with foamers 58
5.11 Compression and gas lift 58
5.12 Compression with plunger lift systems 59
5.13 Compression with beam pumping systems 60
5.14 Compression with electric submersible pump systems 61
5.15 Types of compressors 62
5.15.1 Liquid injected rotary screw compressor 62
5.15.2 Reciprocating compressor 63
5.16 Gas jet compressors or ejectors 64
5.17 Other compressors 66
5.18 Centrifugal compressors 66
5.19 Natural gas engine versus electric compressor drivers 66
5.20 Optimizing compressor operations 67
5.21 Unconventional wells 68
5.22 Summary 68
References 68
Further reading 69
6 Plunger lift 71
6.1 Introduction 71
6.2 Plunger cycles 73
6.2.1 The continuous plunger cycle 73
6.2.2 The conventional plunger cycle 76
6.2.3 When to use the continuous/conventional plunger cycle 78
6.2.4 Additional plunger types 78
6.3 Plunger lift feasibility 81
6.3.1 Gas/liquid ratio rule of thumb 81
Contents vii
14.5 Unique applications for gas well deliquification and oil well
production 364
14.5.1 Plunger lift 365
14.5.2 Sucker rod pumping 370
14.5.3 Progressive cavity pumping 377
14.5.4 Electrical submersible pumping 385
14.5.5 Hydraulic pumping 394
14.5.6 Chemical injection 395
14.5.7 Gas-lift 396
14.5.8 Wellhead compression 405
14.5.9 Heaters 406
14.5.10 Cycling 407
14.5.11 Production allocation 407
14.5.12 Other unique applications 408
14.6 Automation issues 408
14.6.1 Typical benefits 409
14.6.2 Potential problem areas 410
14.6.3 Justification 412
14.6.4 Capital expenditure 414
14.6.5 Operational expense 414
14.6.6 Design 415
14.6.7 Installation 417
14.6.8 Security 418
14.6.9 Staffing 419
14.6.10 Training 421
14.6.11 Commercial versus “in-house” 423
14.7 Case histories 424
14.7.1 Success stories 424
14.7.2 Failures 426
14.7.3 Systems that have not reached their potential 427
14.8 Summary 428
Further reading 428
1.1 Introduction
Liquid loading in a gas well is the inability of the produced gas to lift the produced
liquids from the wellbore. Under this condition, produced liquids will accumulate
in the wellbore leading to reduced production and shortening of the time till the
well no longer produces.
According to EIA, there are about 600,000 gas wells in the United States (see
Fig. 1.1).
By some estimates, 70%80% of gas wells are low rate and below about
300 Mscf/D. Therefore perhaps 400,000500,000 gas wells are at risk of lower or
no production from liquid loading unless artificial lift (AL) is properly applied.
Methods of diagnosing the occurrence of liquid loading will be presented here
for both near vertical conventional wells and horizontal rapidly declining unconven-
tional wells. Methods of solution will be presented and discussed in detail to help
optimize the solution of liquid loading using various forms of AL including:
1. Newer techniques of rod design and rod protection in deviated wells using sucker rod
systems
2. New methods for SRP (sucker rod pump) systems to allow deeper intake for the systems
in horizontal wells
3. Design of gas lift systems for conventional and also declining unconventional wells
using conventional gas lift with bracketed valves for anticipated changing rates
4. Use of high-pressure gas lift to allow more drawdown initially and to eliminate some
downhole equipment
5. New techniques of tracking plungers, various forms of plunger lift, new plunger optimi-
zation techniques, new equipment, and plungers in horizontal wells
Number of elements
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
6. Use of electric submersible pumps (ESPs) to dewater including design for lower rate
wells requiring needed cautions
7. Optimization of progressing cavity pumpings (PCPs) that usually operate in shallower
wells. Rod protection in deviated and horizontal wells
8. The latest in application of foamer chemicals and methods of application
9. Details and methods of application for gas separation for all the pumping systems
10. New advances in automation are presented in a separate chapter. Automation is a neces-
sity if optimum conditions are to be achieved
Dispersed bubble
0.7
Annular
Vsl (ft/s)
Bubble
mist
Slug or churn 6 5 4
3 2 1
0.07
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Vsg (ft/s)
Figure 1.2 Illustration of possible flow regime map for vertical flow.
For above what numbers in bold indicate: (all for 2 3/8’s tubing)
1: 88 bbls/Mscf, 50 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F;
2: 88 bbls/Mscf/100 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F;
3: 88 bbls/Mscf, 200 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F;
4: 200 bbls/Mscf, 100 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F;
5: 200 bbls/Mscf, 50 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F;
6: 200 bbls/Mscf/50 psi, velocity for 320 Mscf/D, 120 F.
this shows why the critical, without this dependency, is still shown to work in
this example.
This example uses an approximate flow regime map and if one is to use the flow
regime chart to suggest if an operational point is above/below critical (in Annular
Mist or not), then one should find a flow regime chart that is tested to agree with
well data.
More details will be shown on the critical velocity and critical rate. Also it will
be shown that Nodal Analysis (Chapter 4) can infer above/below critical or not.
However, this example ties the critical to the multiphase aspects of the calculated
critical rate. It is shown that the flow regime map, the calculated critical rate/
velocity model, and Nodal Analysis will be predictive techniques for critical rate
and under what conditions liquid loading can occur.
A well may initially have a high gas rate so that the flow regime is in mist
flow in the tubing near the surface, but is more liquid rich flow regimes in the
tubing at depth. As time increases and production declines, the flow regimes from
perforations to surface will change as the gas velocity decreases. Liquid produc-
tion may also increase as the gas production declines.
Flow at surface will remain in mist flow until the conditions change sufficiently
at the surface so that the flow exhibits a more liquid rich regime such as slug flow.
At this point, the well production will be observed to become somewhat erratic,
progressing to slug flow as gas rate continues to decline. This will often be
4 Gas Well Deliquification
accompanied by a marked increase in the decline rate. Note this type of analysis is
more complicated than presented here as conditions in a well can be different from
the surface to the bottom hole of the well. For instance liquids may be starting to
accumulate in a more liquid-rich flow pattern downhole and the conditions uphole
can still be in mist flow.
Eventually, the unstable slug flow at surface will transition to a stable, fairly
steady production rate again as the gas rate declines further. This occurs when the
gas rate is too low to carry liquids to surface and simply bubbles up through a stag-
nant liquid column at the bottm of the well.
If corrective action is not taken, the well will continue to decline and eventu-
ally log off. It is also possible that the well continues to flow for a long period in
a loaded condition with gas produces up through liquids with no liquids coming
to the surface. Note that the well can continue to flow below critical, sometimes
for a long time, but it would flow more if the liquid loading problem could be
solved.
G
Lower rates but still above critical (perhaps 3001000/2000 bpd)
Being above critical, the choice is available to flow the wells. However, the use of AL
can exceed the rates above even the most optimum flow situation (which can be deter-
mined by Nodal). So higher rate ALs such as ESP, gas lift, or other pumping systems
may be used to accelerate the rate above flowing conditions. Lower surface pressure helps
all ALs and all above-critical flowing situations. Once AL is selected for the mid-range or
even higher rates, then the process of AL staging begins (from higher rate systems to
lower rate systems).
Conditions may determine the method/s of lift. For instance, if the well is very gassy
or has solids then one may choose gas lift for long-term lift as excessive gas makes use of
pumping systems more difficult. Also excesssive solids production and excesssive devia-
tion or dog-leg severity can make one consider something other than pumping systems.
On the other hand, SRP systems are one of the most profitable methods of lift and
with not too much gas, solids, and well-deviation SRPs can be used for a wide range of
production rates.
Other systems have particular advantages that may help with selection.
G
Below critical production
Here AL is required to prevent loading.
Plunger, surfactants, compression, pumping systems, and gas lift can be considered.
Pumps and then plunger could be sequentially applied. Or gas lift and then plunger
could be a strategy. Discussion of the lift possibilities in the following chapters will help
with the selection or staging of lift possibilities.
G
Low to very low production rates
Beam pumps, hydraulics, and ESPs can be used to low rates. However, low rates for
ESPs can be damaging and a lower limit on production or special precautions should be
considered for EPSs at low rates. PCPs can be used for moderate to low rates but are
more depth-limited. Ineffective gas separation can lead to poor drawdown with pumping
systems.
Gas lift can be used to low rates but a smaller tubing allows for more efficient lift.
Plungers are designed for low rates and modified plunger lift sysstem such as GAPL
(gas-asssisted plunger lift) and progressive plunger lift (use of two or more plungers run-
ning in one well, i.e. one plunger moving up and down in the top part of the well and
another plunger moving up and down in the lower part of the well) can be efficient for
lower rates and lower available well pressures. Sand limits or prevents the use of plunger
lift. Again sand/deviation/gas production tends to lead to gas lift for longer life and fewer
problems but most likely not as good of drawdown under certain circumstances.
Reference
1. Coleman SB, et al. A new look at predicting gas well liquid load-up. J Petrol Technol
1991;32932.
Further reading
Lea JF, Tighe RE. Gas well operation with liquid production. In: SPE 11583, presented at
the 1983 production operation symposium, Oklahoma City, OK, February 27March 1;
1983.
Libson TN, Henry JT. Case histories: identification of and remedial action for liquid loading
in gas wells-intermediate shelf gas play. J Petrol Technol 1980;68593.
Recognizing symptoms of liquid
loading in gas wells 2
James F. Lea’s experience includes about 20 years with Amoco Production
Research, Tulsa, OK; 7 years as Head of PE Department at Texas Tech; and the
last 10 years or so teaching at Petroskills and working for PLTech LLC consulting
company. Lea helped to start the ALRDC Gas Dewatering Forum, is the coauthor
of two previous editions of this book, author of several technical papers, and recipi-
ent of the SPE Production Award, the SWPSC Slonneger Award, and the SPE
Legends of Artificial Lift Award.
Lynn Rowlan, BSCE, 1975, Oklahoma State University, was the recipient of the
2000 J.C. Slonneger Award bestowed by the Southwestern Petroleum Short Course
Association, Inc. He has authored numerous papers for the Southwestern Petroleum
Short Course, Canadian Petroleum Society, and Society of Petroleum Engineers.
Rowlan works as an Engineer for Echometer Company in Wichita Falls, Texas. His
primary interest is to advance the technology used in the Echometer Portable Well
Analyzer to analyze and optimize the real-time operation of all artificial lift produc-
tion systems. He also provides training and consultation for performing well analy-
sis to increase oil and gas production, reduce failures, and reduce power
consumption. He presents many seminars and gives numerous talks on the efficient
operation of oil and gas wells.
2.1 Introduction
As gas rate declines in a gas well (conventional or unconventional), a point will
be reached where liquids will begin to accumulate in the tubing and either further
diminish the production or possibly stop the production altogether.
If the liquid loading in wellbore goes unnoticed, the liquids can accumulate in
the wellbore and the adjoining reservoir, possibly causing temporary or even per-
manent damage. It is important that the effects caused by liquid loading are
detected early to prevent costly losses during production and possible reservoir
damage.
This chapter discusses methods to recognize the occurrence of liquid loading.
Methods can be predictive or can be observations of field symptoms. Actual field
symptoms are more preferable as predictive methods may have some deviation
from reality. However, field symptoms can also have their problems as drop in pro-
duction could be due to formation damage, sand accumulations, or scaling which
could be erroneously attributed to liquid loading.
Critical velocity
Critical velocity correlations predict at what rate liquid loading will occur as the
well rates decline. It is not a function of liquid production or bbl/mmscf. It is
(for some widely used correlations) based on what rate or velocity will carry the
liquid droplets up and when they can no longer be foreseen to travel up, then liquid
loading is predicted. Turner and Coleman are two widely used methods but there
are many other models.
Recognizing symptoms of liquid loading in gas wells 9
The critical flow chart, shown in Fig. 2.1, shows that the critical rate for 2 3/8’s
tubing at 100 psi is about 320 Mscf/D with water production. If liquid is only
condensate, the critical rate (and velocity) would be less. If any water is produced
with condensate, use the water chart. Therefore, critical velocity correlations is a
quick method to assess if flow is critical or not or is approaching critical. Note X-
axis should be in psi.
1500
1000
500
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Flowing pressure (psi)
Figure 2.1 Critical flow rate versus pressure and tubing size.
10 Gas Well Deliquification
Dispersed bubble
0.7
Annular
Bubble
mist
VsI (ft/s)
Slug or churn
0.07
0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000
Vsg (ft/s)
Input API 30
Input Tbg ID 1:995 in:
Input WG 1:00
Input bbls=mmscf 88:00
input WC 0:95
Input Mscf=D 320:00
Calculated lip density 0:99
Calculated BPD 28:16
Calbulated Tbg area 0:0217 ft2
Input pressure 100:00 psi
Input temperature 120:00 F
Input Z factor 0:90
Calculated Scf=D 320; 000:00
0:08 ft=s
Calculate Vsl
0:03 m=s
170:70 ft=s 25:18998 in situ ft=s
Calculate Vsg
52:03 m=s 7:677905 in situ m=s
where Vsl and Vsg are calculated using the following formulas:
Vsl 5 BPD 3 5:615= 86; 400 3 areatbg Vsg 5 Scf=D=ð86; 400 3 tubing areaÞ
Vsg 5 Scf=D=ð86; 400 3 tubing areaÞ
Multiply by: 14=7=P0 ðT 1 460Þ 3 Z=520 to convert to in situ gas velocity
WG 5 Water gravity; Vsl 5 superficial liquid velocity; and
Vsg 5 superficial gas velocity
From the above example the calculated round dot in the flow regime map
corresponding to the above input data is inside the annular-mist flow regime. Thus,
according to the example flow regime map, the well is not liquid loaded in this
condition. Actually, this condition is for the critical velocity as predicted by
Turner’s model for critical velociy and critical rate. However, critical velocity, flow
regime maps, and Nodal Analysis are all predictive techniques and it is wise to
verify these methods with field symptoms which are discussed next.
12 Gas Well Deliquification
Figure 2.5 Drop of data below the decline curve well below liquid loading.
Fig. 2.5 shows a drop below the goal decline curve well below the critical. This
is a well where the rate declined below critical and an artificial lift is installed to
keep the well producing along the target decline curve. The drop below the decline
curve is an indication that the artificial lift (perhaps plunger) is experiencing some
problems which need to be diagnosed in attempt to bring production back to the tar-
get or decline curve. If plunger lift is being used, the problems could be a worn or
sticking plunger or the cycle for the plunger needs adjustment back to more opti-
mum control. If other methods of AL are being used then the AL system must be
diagnosed with troubleshooting techniques particular to that system.
pressures is an indcator of liquid loading. These effects are illustrated in Fig. 2.5
but the changes may/may not be linear with time as shown.
Finally, estimates of the tubing pressure gradient can be made in a flowing well
without a packer by measuring the difference in the tubing and casing pressures. In
a packerless production well the free gas will separate from the liquids in the well-
bore and rise into the annulus. The fluid level in a flowing well will remain
depressed at the tubing intake depth, except when “heading” occurs or a tubing leak
is present.
During “heading” the liquid level in the annulus periodically rises and then
falls back to the tubing intake. In a flowing well, however, the difference in the
surface casing and tubing pressures is an indication of the pressure loss in the
production tubing. The weight of the gas column in the casing can be computed
easily. Comparing the difference between casing and tubing pressures with a dry
gas gradient for the casing can give an estimate of the higher tubing gradient due
to liquids accumulating or loading in the tubing. This will also allow the compari-
son to multiphase flow pressure drop correlations to check for accuracy for differ-
ent correlations (Fig. 2.6).
Depth
Liquid level
Pressure
Since the density of the gas is significantly lower than that of water or conden-
sate, the measured gradient curve will exhibit a sharp change of slope when the tool
encounters standing liquid in the tubing. Thus the pressure survey provides an accu-
rate means of determining the liquid level in the wellbore. If the liquid level is
higher than the perforations, liquid loading problems are indicated.
Fig. 2.7 illustrates the basic principle associated with the pressure survey. Note
that the gas and liquid production rates can change the slopes measured by the survey,
giving a higher gas gradient because of some liquids dispersed and a lower liquid gra-
dient due to the presence of gas in the liquid. Also note that the liquid level in a shut-
in gas well can be measured acoustically by shooting a liquid level down the tubing.
Although it was previously done with a wireline pressure survey, a fluid level can be
shot down the tubing with special cautions (echometer technique) to detect a fluid
level with no wireline pressure survey (see Section 2.3.4).
then you move into the slug flow regime. One indication of liquid loading is that
you see slugs of liquid being produced (you can hear them at the well) where there
were no slugs of liquid before. Actually by the time you start seeing the slug flow
at the surface, a good portion of the well downhole is most likely already liquid
loaded, so this indicator is sort of an after-fact indicator. However, it is still an indi-
cator and if you see slug flow at the surface, the well is liquid loaded (unless well
damage dropped the gas flow and put you into the slug flow regime).
In the past, this has also caught some operators by surprise as they had smooth
data from the flow measurement orifice while in mist flow, but suddenly got spikes
in the readings when slugs start coming through. This may not be an issue now as
most will have liquid KO’s in front of the gas measuring orifice to handle the
liquids before measurement. However, you can still hear slugs if they are present in
the wellhead before the liquids are knocked out.
Figure 2.8 Types of flow that occur in the tubing when shooting acoustic fluid levels.
Source: Echometer.
18 Gas Well Deliquification
A Type 1 well
1. Liquid being produced with the gas or condensing due to temperature and pressure
changes is uniformly distributed in the wellbore.
2. Gas velocity is sufficient to continuously carry liquid as a fine mist or small droplets to
the surface (above critical).
3. Gas velocity is sufficient to establish a relatively low and fairly uniform flowing pressure
gradient.
If you shut the well in and quickly shoot a fluid level down the tubing the appar-
ent fluid level (top of the mist in the tubing) will appear to be at the surface.
The longer you keep the well shut-in, the more the top of the mist flow will
move toward the bottom of the well with dry gas flowing above the mist level. This
is the condition that many high-flow wells flow in initially when they are high on
the decline curve. Later the wells can move into Types 2 and 3 conditions.
A Type 2 well
In Fig. 2.9 a casing fluid level shot on a Type 2 well is shown with an expanded
view near the end of the tubing. The well is operating in a stabilized condition with
gas only flowing up the tubing, with the surface casing valve closed, and with no
packer in the well. The fluid level is shot down the tubing immediately once the
well is shut-in and then shot down the casing either after the tubing shot or before
the well is shut-in. The casing fluid level shot confirms that the liquid level from
the casing shot is located at the end of the tubing as expected. A troubleshooting
technique is to shoot fluid level down the casing and confirm that the liquid level is
located at the end of the tubing, because a high fluid level in the casing often indi-
cates that there is a possible hole in the tubing.
The wellbore drawing displays the tubing gassy fluid level somewhere in
the well below the surface. If the well is continued to be shut-in, then the fluid
level will move downward as the gas flow into the tubing increases the tubing
surface pressure. The casing pressure will gradually increase to support the increas-
ing gas pressure in the tubing, thereby maintaining the liquid level at the end of the
tubing.
The tubing gas velocity is not high enough to lift this well’s 2087 ft of
accumulated gassy tubing liquids to the surface because the flowing gas rate
is below critical causing the well to be liquid loaded. Liquid loading accumulated
in the bottom of the tubing causes 553 psi of tubing backpressure to act
against the formation reducing inflow. Calculating the difference between casing
minus tubing pressure, 429 psi, is a simplified way of estimating the liquid load-
ing in the tubing. In this 10,536 ft deep well the fluid level shot shows there is
124 psi of additional liquid loading when compared to the difference between cas-
ing and tubing surface pressures. As the gas rate decreases, the concentration of
liquid at the bottom of the well increases. Depending on the well as the casing
pressure increases, the tubing liquid may unload from the bottom of the well.
When the tubing is set deep and the gas flow decreases as the pressure increases,
all flow from the formation can stop. When the tubing is set above the bottom of
the perforations, the accumulated liquid in the tubing is usually pushed out by the
increasing tubing pressure.
The simple picture of the well represents the flowing pressure gradient in
the well bores. There is a light gas gradient above the gas/liquid interface (close to
gradient of flowing gas), below the liquid level is a heavier gradient composed of
gas flowing through liquid. The liquid is held up by the gas flow (zero net liquid
flow) with gas bubbles or slugs percolating through the liquid. Below the end of the
tubing the liquid gradient is heavier due to reduced gas velocity.
A Type 3 well
Fluid is at the bottom of the well. Gas flow has stopped. No liquids are transported
to the surface. If the well is shut-in and a fluid shot is immediately made then the
fluid level will be indicated. While the well is shut-in the fluid level will move
down in the well as pressure builds up in the tubing. Fig. 2.10 shows the up-kick on
the acoustic trace from the increase in cross-sectional area at the top of the perfora-
tions, and the liquid level at 6069 ft has been pushed to the bottom of the
perforations.
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
is the sweet landmark, whence foreigners may take aim of the
ancient English customs ; the gentry more floating after foreign
fashions. — DR. FULLER. 636 YES. — The Importance of A
monosyllable of mighty import ! It decides the fate of things, of
persons, and of empires. — DR. DAVIES. YES AND NO. Man's first
word is — Yes ; his second — No ; his third and last — Yes. Most
stop short at the first ; very few get to the last. — ATTWELL.
YESTERDAYS.— Our All our yesterdays have lighted fools The way to
dusty death. SHAKSPEARE. YIELDING.— The Wisdom of When the
two goats, on a narrow bridge, met over a deep stream, was not he
the wiser that laid down for the other to pass over him, than he that
would rather hazard both their lives by contending? He preserved
himself from danger, and made the other become debtor to him for
his safety. I will never think myself disparaged either by preserving
peace or doing good. — FELTHAM. YOUNG. — The Advantage of
Dying To die young is youth's divinest gift, — To pass from one
world fresh into another Ere change hath lost the charm of soft
regret, And feel the immortal impulse from within Which makes the
coming life cry alway — " On J " And follow it while strong — is
Heaven's last mercy. P. J. BAILEY. YOUNG.— Counsel to the Might I
give counsel to my young hearer, I would say — Try to frequent the
company of your betters ; in books and life that is the most
wholesome society; learn to admire rightly — the great pleasure of
life is that. Note what the great specially admire ; they admire great
things : narrow spirits admire basely, and worship meanly* —
THACKERAY. YOUNG. — Feeling in the Feeling in the young precedes
philosophy, and often acts with a more certain aim. — CARLETON.
YOUNG.— The Insanity of the The little child, when it sees a star
sparkle, stretches out its dimpled arms ; it wants that star. To want a
star is the beautiful insanity of the young. — GASPARIN.
The text on this page is estimated to be only 27.17%
accurate
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
[Link]