Module II Seminar
Module II Seminar
Production is the process by which different inputs, including capital, labor, and land, are used to
create outputs in the form of products or services. Production is important to ensure the efficient
use of tangible and intangible resources, the generation of employment, and achieving economic
efficiency.
Firms can turn inputs into outputs in a variety of ways, using various combinations of labour,
materials, and capital. We can describe the relationship between the inputs into the production
process and the resulting output by a production function. A production function indicates the
highest output ‘q’ that a firm can produce for every specified combination of inputs.
Although in practice firms use a wide variety of inputs, we will keep our analysis simple by focusing
on only two, labour L and capital K. We can then write the production function as:
q = F (K, L)
This equation relates the quantity of output to the quantities of the two inputs, capital and labour. It
is important to keep in mind that inputs and outputs are flows. Because the production function
allows inputs to be combined in varying proportions, output can be produced in many ways. Also
note that equation applies to a given technology—that is, to a given state of knowledge about the
various methods that might be used to transform inputs into outputs. As the technology becomes
more advanced and the production function changes, a firm can obtain more output for a given set
of inputs.
Production functions describe what is technically feasible when the firm operates efficiently—that is,
when the firm uses each combination of inputs as effectively as possible. The presumption that
production is always technically efficient need not always hold, but it is reasonable to expect that
profit-seeking firms will not waste resources.
ii. Complementarity: The factors of production are also complementary to one another, that is, the
two or more inputs are to be used together as nothing will be produced if the quantity of either of
the inputs used in the production process is zero
iii. Specificity: It reveals that the inputs are specific to the production of a particular product.
Machines and equipment’s, specialized workers and raw materials are a few examples of the
specificity of factors of production.
X0 = f (L, K)
by the same proportion ‘k’, and we observe the resulting new level of output X*
X* = f (kL, kK)
If k can be factored out (that is, may be taken out of the brackets as a common factor), then the new
level of output X* can be expressed as a function of k (to any power v) and the initial level of output:
X* = kv
f (L, K)
or
X*= kvX0
and the production function is called homogeneous. If k cannot be factored out, the production
function is non-homogeneous. Thus:
A homogeneous function is a function such that if each of the inputs is multiplied by k, then k can be
completely factored out of the function. The power ‘v’ of k is called the degree of homogeneity of
the function and is a measure of the returns to scale:
If v = 1 we have constant returns to scale. This production function is sometimes called linear
homogeneous.
For a homogeneous production function the returns to scale may be represented graphically in an
easy way. Before explaining the graphical presentation of the returns to scale it is useful to introduce
the concepts of product line and [Link] analyse the expansion of output, it is easier to show the
change of output by shifts of the isoquant and use the concept of product lines to describe the
expansion of output.
A product line shows the (physical) movement from one isoquant to another as we change
bothfactors or a single factor. A product curve is drawn independently of the prices of factors of
production. It does not imply any actual choice of expansion, which is based on the prices of factors
and is shown by the expansion path.
The product line describes the technically possible alternative paths of expanding output. What path
will actually be chosen by the firm will depend on the prices of factors.
The product curve passes through the origin if all factors are variable. If only one factor is variable
(the other being kept constant) the product line is a straight line parallel to the axis of the variable
factor (Figure A). The K/L ratio diminishes along the product line.
Among all possible product lines of particular interest are the so-called isoclines. An isocline is the
locus of points of different isoquants at which the MRTS of factors is constant.
If the production function is homogeneous the isoclines are straight lines through the origin. Along
any one isocline the K/L ratio is constant (as is the MRTS of the factors). Of course the K/ L ratio (and
the MRTS) is different for different isoclines (Figure B).If the production function is non-
homogeneous the isoclines will not be straight lines, but their shape will be twiddly. The K/L ratio
changes along each isocline (as well as on different isoclines) (Figure C).
Non homogeneous production function
If the production function is non homogeneous the isoclines will not be straight lines,but their shape
will be [Link] K/L ratio changes along each isocline.
If the homogenous production function is of degree one, we say that it is linearly homogenous
production function (i.e. it has constant returns to scale).
The Cobb – Douglas Production Function is an empirical production function developed byCharles W.
Cobb (American Mathematician) and Paul H. Douglas (American Economist) based on empirical
studies of various manufacturing industries of the USA. This production function was published in
American economic Review in 1928 in the form of an article A Theory of Production.
It is a linear homogeneous production function of degree one which takes into account two inputs,
labour and capital, for the entire output of the manufacturing industry.
Q = ALα Kβ
where;
The above equation tells that output depends directly on L and K, and that part of output which
cannot be explained by L and K is explained by A which is the ‘residual’, often called technical
change. It also tells that production requires both the inputs labour (L) and capital (K). if any of the
inputs becomes zero, production will also become zero.
The production function solved by Cobb-Douglas had 1/4 contribution of capital to the increase in
manufacturing industry and 3/4 of labour so that the C-D production function is:
Q = AL3/4 K1/4
This equation shows constant returns to scale because the sum of the exponents of L and K is equal
to one i.e. (α + β = 1).
The more capital or labour we use, the more of a good we are going to get, but it is not a one to one
conversion. It means that a 1 percent change in either factor would not result in a 1% change in total
production, but is rather dependent on the level of output elasticity associated with the factor. Each
of these values is a positive constant no bigger than 1 and is dependent on the level of available
technology (0 < = α < = 1, 0 < = β < = 1). In practice they have to be smaller than 1 because a perfect
production process does not exist - inefficiencies in labour and capital occur. The C-D production
function showing constant returns to scale is depicted in the following Figure:
Labour input is taken on the horizontal axis and capital on the vertical axis. It is clear from the
Figure that, when inputs are doubled, output also gets doubled (shown by equidistant isoquants).
PROPERTIES OF C-D PRODUCTION FUNCTION
IMPORTANCE OF C-D PRODUCTION FUNCTION
1. It has been used widely in empirical studies of manufacturing industries and in inter-industry
comparison.
2. It is used to determine the relative shares of labour and capital in total output.
4. It’s parameters α and β represent elasticity coefficients that are used for inter-sectoral
comparison.
CRITICISMS
The major criticisms of C-D production was made by Kenneth Joseph arrow, B.S Minhas, Robert
solow and Chenery. Later these 4 developed the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES).
1. It considers only 2 inputs – labour and capital and neglects some important inputs like raw
materials which are used in production.
2. In the C-D production function, the problem of measurement of capital arises because it takes
only the quantity of capital available for production.
3. It shows only constant returns to scale. But constant returns to scale are not an actuality.
5. This function is based on the assumption of perfect competition in the factor market which is
unrealistic.
6. One of the weaknesses of C-D production is the aggregation problem. This problem arises when
this function is applied to every firm in an industry and the entire industry.
Technological progress has been one of the major forces behind Economic growth overtime. It
enables output to rise even when the factors of production remain at a constant level. Technical
progress could be shown with an upward shift of the production function (Refer Fig. 5.10 A, where
with same level of Labour L1, more of output could be produced, X1 > X) or a downward movement
of the production isoquant (Refer Fig. 5.10 B, where the same level of output X could be produced
by fewer quantities of factors of production K1 and L1, with K1 < K0 and L1 < L0).
Hicks had distinguished three types of technical progress depending on its effect on rate of
substitution of factors of production. They are as follows:
Technical progress is said to be capital-deepening (or Labour saving) when shifted Isoquant due to
technical progress has lower MRTSLK at the equilibrium points. This results as MPK increases more
than MPL. It simply means that the technical progress has resulted in increasing capital per worker
or capital intensity in the economy. Refer Fig. 5.11, where as we move closer to the origin, MRTSLK
falls along the equilibrium points.
Labour Deepening Technical Progress
Technical progress is said to be Labour-deepening (or Capital saving) when shifted Isoquant due to
technical progress has higher MRTSLK at the equilibrium points. This results as MPL increases more
than MPK. This results when technical progress decreases capital per worker or capital intensity in
the economy. Refer Fig. 5.12, where as we move closer to the origin, MRTSLKrises along the
equilibrium points.
Technical progress is said to be neutral when for a shifted Isoquant due to technical progress
MRTSLK does not change at the equilibrium points. Here, MPK and MPL both increase at same
proportion. This is represented inFig. 5.13, where as we move closer to the origin, MRTSLK remains
constant along the equilibrium points.
CES Production Function
Another most popular neo classical production function is constant elasticity of
substitution (CES) production function. The CES production function was
developed by Arrow, Chenery, Minhas and Solow as a generalisation of the Cobb
Douglas production function that allows for non-negative and constant elasticity of
substitution. ." They developed a model to understand how the substitution
between capital and labor affects production and efficiency.
Functional Form: The standard CES production function can be written as:
They both are positive for K,L>0. With any small increase in capital or labor
increases the output but at a diminishing rate.
In conclusion, the marginal products of capital and labor are positive, indicating positive returns
to inputs. As the quantities of capital and labor increase, the marginal products of each input
decrease, indicating diminishing returns to inputs.
2. Inada Conditions
(The Inada conditions are a set of properties that a production function can satisfy to ensure
certain desirable characteristics, such as the stability of economic growth models. These
conditions are particularly relevant for neoclassical growth models.)
(The elasticity of substitution (σ\sigmaσ) is a measure of how easily one input (e.g., capital K)
can be substituted for another input (e.g., labor LLL) in production)
VES production function was developed by Lu and Flecher in the 1968. In the earlier
production functions, we observed that elasticity of substitution is one or constant. However,
the VES function attempts to remedy this short coming by allowing the elasticity of substitution
to change with a change in inputs, ie; we relax the assumption of constant elasticity of
substitution and arrive at variable elasticity of substitution. The variability in elasticity of
substitution gives more flexibility in understanding the product behavior.
VES is a homogenous function. It can be used to model constant, increasing or decreasing
returns to scale depending on the value of the returns to scale parameter. The VES production
function reduces to the Cobb-Douglas production function when 𝜌 = 1.
The VES production function can be expressed as:
𝑌 = 𝛾𝐾^{𝛼(1−𝛿𝜌)}[𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾]^{𝛼𝛿𝜌}
Where:
Y: Output
K: Capital
L: Labor
α,ρ,δ andγ: Parameters
𝛾 > 0, α > 0
0< δ <1
0≤ ρδ ≤1
L/K > 1−𝜌/1−ρδ
Here, α is the parameter of returns of scale. If the value of α is 1, the production function
exhibits constant returns to scale.
Elasticity of Substitution: The elasticity of substitution σ for the for the VES production
function is:
σ = σ(K, L) = 1 + 𝜌 – 1 K / 1 – 𝛿𝜌 L
The elasticity of substitution σ varies with the capital labour ratio around the
intercept term of unity.
The elasticity of substitution is greater than zero over the relevant range of K/L.
𝑌 = 𝛾𝐾^{𝛼(1−𝛿𝜌)}[𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾]^{𝛼𝛿𝜌}
𝑀𝑃𝐿 =∂Y/∂L= [𝛼𝛿𝜌] 𝑌/𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾 > 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 ≤ 𝛿𝜌 ≤ 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐿/𝐾 >1 – 𝜌/ 1 − 𝛿𝜌
𝑀𝑃𝐾 =∂Y/∂K= 𝛼(1 − 𝛿𝜌) 𝑌/𝐾 + 𝛼𝛿𝜌(𝜌 − 1) 𝑌 /𝐿+ (𝜌 − 1)𝐾 > 0
Here any small increase in capital will lead to a decrease in the marginal product of
capital. Any small increase in capital cause output to rise but at a
diminishing rate. The same is true for labor.
ii. VES Production Function reduced to Cobb Douglas and Linear
production Function
For 𝜌 = 0 » Harrod Domar Fixed Coefficient Model
For 𝜌 = 1 » Cobb Douglas Production Function
For 𝜌 = 1/𝛿(> 1) »Linear Production Function
iii. The Elasticity of Substitution can vary along an Isoquant: The VES
requires that the elasticity of substitution be the same only along a ray through
the origin.
VES production function can also be expressed as:
Where:
V shows returns to scale
A is the efficiency parameter
a(alpha) and B(beta) are the shares of capital and labour respectively.
Subject ECONOMICS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Introduction
3. Cobb Douglas Production Function
4. CES Production Function
5. VES Production Function
6. Translog Production Function
7. Summary
1. Learning Outcomes
2. Introduction
Production Function
Nature imposes technological constraints on firms; only certain combination of inputs are
feasible ways to produce a given amount of output, and the firm must limit itself to
technologically feasible production plans. The easiest way to describe feasible production
plans is to list them. The set of all combinations of inputs and outputs that comprise a
technologically feasible way is called a production function. The relation between inputs
and output of a firm is known as production function. Production function is a purely
technical relation which connects factor inputs and output. It shows the maximum
amount of output that can be produced from any specified set of inputs given the existing
technology. It is a flow concept so production refers to units of output over a period of
time.
It refers to the relation between inputs and outputs of a firm.
It is a flow concept so production refers to units of output over a period of time.
Y f ( X 1 , X 2 , , X n )
where
Y Output
X 1 , X 2 ,, X n Quantity of factor inputsSuch as land , labour, capital or raw material
f shows the functional relationship between inputs and output.
Concept of Product: There are three important concepts regarding physical production
of factors:-
TPL APL L
or
TPL MPL
Where TPL Total product of labour
APL Average product of labour
L Labour or Variable factor
MP MP of Labour
SumTotal
Total Product (TPL) initially rises at an increasing rate (so the slope of the TP L curve is
rising in the beginning) but after a point TP L curve starts rising at a diminishing rate,
reaches a maximum and then starts falling as the usage of variable factor increases.
TPL
Thus, APL
L
Where APL Average Pr oduct of Labour
TPL Total Pr oduct of Labour
L Number of labour employed
Average Product (AP) is an inverted ‘U’ shape curve. The AP curve first rises, reaches a
maximum and then falls thereafter as the usage of the variable factor increases. Average
Product at any point on the total product curve is the slope of the straight line from the
origin to that point on the total product curve.
It measures the slope of the total product curve. Marginal Product (MP) is an inverted ‘U’
shape curve. The MP curve first rises, reaches a maximum and then falls thereafter as the
usage of the variable factor increases. When total product starts falling, Marginal product
becomes negative. Marginal Product is the slope of the tangent line to the total product
curve.
Mathematical Form: The mathematical form of the Cobb Douglas production function
for a single output with two factors can be written as
𝑌 = 𝑓(𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐴) = 𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
where Y: Output
K: Capital input
L: Labour input
ECONOMICS Paper 3: Fundamentals of Microeconomic Theory
Module 15: Special Production Functions- Cobb-Douglas, CES, VES,
Translog and their properties
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Constant Returns to Scale: The return to scale is a long run concept when all the
factors of production are variable. In long run output can be increased by increasing all
the factor of production. An increase in scale means that all factors are increased in the
same proportion, output will increase but the increase may be at an increasing rate or at a
constant rate or at a decreasing rate.
(i) Increasing Returns to scale: Increasing return to scale occurs when output
increases in a greater proportion than increase in inputs. If all factors are increased
by 20% then output increases by say 30%. So by doubling the factors, output
increases by more than double.
(ii) Constant Returns to scale: Constant Return to Scale occurs when output
increases in the same proportion as increase in input. If all factors are increased
by 20% then output also increases by 20%. So doubling of all factors causes a
doubling of output then returns to scale are constant. The constant return to scale
is also called linearly homogenous production function.
(iii) Decreasing Returns to scale Decreasing return to scale occurs when output
increases in a lesser proportion than increase in inputs. If all the factors are
increased by 20% then output increases by less than 20%.
It is shown in Fig [Link] labour and capital is shown on X-axis and Y-axis. Y1, Y2 and
Y3 are the isoquant curves showing different levels of output. . Under constant return to
scale the distance between successive isoquants remain same as we expand output from
100 to 200 to 300 units. On straight line OR starting from origin the distance OA, AB and
BC all are equal.
If the sum of the two exponents for capital and labour is greater than one then the
function exhibits increasing returns to scale. And if the sum of the two exponents for
capital and labour is less than one then the function exhibits decreasing returns to scale.
Isoquant are Convex to the Origin: Under Cobb-Douglas production function, isoquant
are convex to the origin. Fig 15.2 represents an isoquant map. An isoquant map refers to
the family of isoquant curves where higher the isoquant, higher is the level of production.
In the figure, labor is measured on X-axis and capital on Y-axis. Y1, Y2 and Y3 are the
isoquant curves showing various possible combinations of inputs physically capable of
producing a given level of output. If you can operate production activities independently,
then weighted averages of production plans will also be feasible. Hence the isoquants will
have a convex shape.
The isoquant Y1 represents 100 units of output whereas isoquant Y2 represents 200 units
of output and the level of output is higher on isoquant Y2 than Y1. Isoquant Y3 shows 300
units of output which is higher than the level of output as shown by isoquant Y1 and Y2
and so on. So, higher the isoquant, higher is the level of output.
(i) Under Cobb Douglas production function, the average product and marginal
products of factor depend upon the ratio in which the factors are combined to
produce output.
∂Y 𝛼−1 1−𝛼
𝐾 𝛼−1
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = = 𝐴𝛼𝐾 𝐿 = 𝐴𝛼 ( )
∂K 𝐿
Y 𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼 𝐾 𝛼−1
𝐴𝑃𝐾 = = = 𝐴( )
K 𝐾 𝐿
The average product of capital depends on the ratio of capital and labor (K/L)
and does not depend upon the absolute quantities of the factors used. The
same is true for labor.
(ii) The marginal product is proportional to the output per unit of its factor.
∂Y 𝐾 𝛼−1 𝑌
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = = 𝐴𝛼𝐾 𝛼−1 𝐿1−𝛼 = 𝐴𝛼 ( ) = 𝛼( )
∂K 𝐿 𝐾
∂Y 𝛼 −𝛼
𝐾 𝛼 𝑌
𝑀𝑃𝐿 = = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾 𝐿 = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼) ( ) = (1 − 𝛼) ( )
∂L 𝐿 𝐿
The Cobb Douglas production function is linear in parameter. It can be estimated using
least squares method.
.
𝑌 = 𝑓(𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐴) = 𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
𝑓(λK, λL, A) = 𝐴(𝜆𝐾)𝛼 (𝜆𝐿)1−𝛼
= 𝐴𝜆𝛼 𝐾 𝛼 𝜆1−𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
= 𝜆𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
= 𝜆𝑌
If the function exhibits decreasing returns to scale then 𝑓(𝜆𝐾, 𝜆𝐿, 𝐴) <
𝜆𝑌 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝜆 > 1.
If the function exhibits increasing returns to scale then 𝑓(𝜆𝐾, 𝜆𝐿, 𝐴) >
𝜆𝑌 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑎𝑛𝑦 𝜆 > 1.
ii. Positive and Diminishing Returns to Inputs: The Cobb Douglas production
function is increasing in labor and capital i.e. positive marginal products.
∂Y ∂Y
(i) > 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 >0
∂K ∂L
𝑌 = 𝑓(𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐴) = 𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
∂Y
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = = 𝐴𝛼𝐾 𝛼−1 𝐿1−𝛼
∂K
∂Y
𝑀𝑃𝐿 = = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾 𝛼 𝐿−𝛼
∂L
Assuming A, L and K are all positive and 0 < 𝛼 < 1, the marginal products are positive.
2
(ii) Diminishing Marginal Products with respect to each Input: ∂ Y2 <
∂K
2
0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 ∂ Y <0
2
∂L
2
∂ Y = 𝐴𝛼(𝛼 − 1)𝐾 𝛼−2 𝐿1−𝛼 <0 if α<1
2
∂K
Here, any small increase in capital will lead to a decrease in the marginal product of
capital. Any small increase in capital cause output to rise but at a diminishing
rate. The same is true for labor.
(ii) The marginal product of capital (labor) approaches zero as capital (labor)
goes to infinity.
∂Y ∂Y
lim = lim =0
𝐾→∞ ∂K 𝐿→∞ ∂L
iv. The Cobb Douglas production function has elasticity of substitution equal
to unity.
𝑑 𝐾/𝐿 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆
𝜎= 𝑥
𝑑 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 𝐾/𝐿
where 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 = 𝑀𝑃𝐿 /𝑀𝑃𝐾
𝐾 𝛼
» 𝐿 = 1−𝛼 ∗ 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆,
𝑑(𝐾/𝐿) 𝛼
=
𝑑𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 1 − 𝛼
𝑑 𝐾/𝐿 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆
𝜎= 𝑥 =1
𝑑 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 𝐾/𝐿
v. Constant Income Shares of Output: The exponent of capital (labor),α (1- α),
represents the contribution of capital (labor) to output. This is the same as the
portion of output distributed to capital (labor) i.e. capital (labor) income share.
𝑌 = 𝑓(𝐾, 𝐿, 𝐴) = 𝐴𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
The real wage of labour (w) is calculated by partially differentiating Y w.r.t. L, which is
nothing but marginal product of labor (𝑀𝑃𝐿 ).
∂Y 𝛼 −𝛼
𝐾 𝛼 𝑌
𝑤 = 𝑀𝑃𝐿 = = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾 𝐿 = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼) ( ) = (1 − 𝛼) ( )
∂L 𝐿 𝐿
Total wage bill=𝑤. 𝐿 = 𝑀𝑃𝐿 . 𝐿 = 𝐴(1 − 𝛼)𝐾 𝛼 𝐿1−𝛼
Functional Form: The standard CES production function can be written as:
The CES production function is linearly homogeneous and therefore exhibits constant
returns to scale. It is non linear in parameters, so cannot be estimated using least squares
method.
ii. Positive and Diminishing Returns to Inputs: The marginal products of the
input are
∂Y 𝛿
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = = 𝜌 (𝑌/𝐾)𝜌+1
∂K 𝐴
∂Y 1 − 𝛿
𝑀𝑃𝐿 = = (𝑌/𝐿)𝜌+1
∂L 𝐴𝜌
They both are positive for K,L>0. With any small increase in capital or labor increases
the output but at a diminishing rate.
𝟏
iv. The Elasticity of Substitution is 𝝈 = 𝟏+𝝆.
The elasticity of substitution is calculated using formula:
𝑑 𝐾/𝐿 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆
𝜎= 𝑥
𝑑 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 𝐾/𝐿
where 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 = 𝑀𝑃𝐿 /𝑀𝑃𝐾
𝑀𝑃𝐿 1 − 𝛿
𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 = = (𝐾/𝐿)𝜌+1
𝑀𝑃𝐾 𝛿
𝑑 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 1 − 𝛿
= (𝐾/𝐿)𝜌 (1 + 𝜌)
𝑑 𝐾/𝐿 𝛿
𝑑 𝐾/𝐿 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 1
𝜎= 𝑥 =
𝑑 𝑀𝑅𝑇𝑆 𝐾/𝐿 1+𝜌
Here, α is the parameter of returns of scale. If the value of α is 1, the production function
exhibits constant returns to scale.
Elasticity of Substitution: The elasticity of substitution σ for the for the VES production
function is
𝜌−1 𝐾
σ = σ(K, L) = 1 +
1 − 𝛿𝜌 𝐿
The elasticity of substitution σ varies with the capital labor ratio around the
intercept term of unity.
The elasticity of substitution is greater than zero over the relevant range of K/L.
𝐿 1−𝜌
For σ>0 requires that 𝐾 > 1−𝛿𝜌 .
∂Y ∂Y
(iii) > 0 𝑎𝑛𝑑 >0
∂K ∂L
𝑌 = 𝛾𝐾 𝛼(1−𝛿𝜌) [𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾]𝛼𝛿𝜌
∂Y 𝑌 𝐿 1−𝜌
𝑀𝑃𝐿 = = 𝛼𝛿𝜌 > 0 𝑓𝑜𝑟 0 ≤ 𝛿𝜌 ≤ 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 >
∂L 𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾 𝐾 1 − 𝛿𝜌
∂Y 𝑌 𝑌
𝑀𝑃𝐾 = = 𝛼(1 − 𝛿𝜌) + 𝛼𝛿𝜌(𝜌 − 1) >0
∂K 𝐾 𝐿 + (𝜌 − 1)𝐾
Here any small increase in capital will lead to a decrease in the marginal product of
capital. Any small increase in capital cause output to rise but at a
diminishing rate. The same is true for labor.
iii. The Elasticity of Substitution can vary along an Isoquant: The VES
requires that the elasticity of substitution be the same only along a ray through
the origin.
𝑛 𝑛
1/2[∑𝑛
𝑗=1 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln 𝑥𝑗 ]
= 𝛼0 ∏ 𝑥𝑖𝛼𝑖 ∏ 𝑥𝑖
𝑖=1 𝑖=1
Where
Y: Output
𝛼0 : Efficiency Parameter
𝛼𝑖 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝛽𝑖𝑗 : 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 (𝑈𝑛𝑘𝑛𝑜𝑤𝑛)
𝑥𝑗∶ 𝐼𝑛𝑝𝑢𝑡 𝑗
Logarithm Form: Taking log both sides, we obtain
𝑛 𝑛 𝑛
Monotonicity and Translog Production Function: The marginal product i.e addition to
total product due to addition of one more factor is
∂Y ∂lnY 𝑌
𝑀𝑃𝑖 = = .
∂xi ∂lnxi 𝑥𝑖
∂lnY
Where ∂lnx is the production elasticity which can be calculated from log form.
i
𝑛
∂lnY
= 𝛼𝑖 + ∑ 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln xj (i = 1,2, … . , n)
∂lnxi
𝑗=1
𝑛
Y
So, 𝑀𝑃𝑖 = [𝛼𝑖 + ∑ 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln xj ]
𝑗=1 xi
MP of xi can be positive for a range in values of xj but can be negative if 𝛽𝑖𝑗 > 0
(all i,j) and xj → 0.
If there exist at least one 𝛽𝑖𝑗 < 0 then 𝑀𝑃𝑖 < 0 𝑎𝑠 xj → ∞.
Thus, the translog function is not monotonic.
Is Isoquants under Translog Function Convex: The isoquants are strictly quasi-convex
if the Bordered Hessian matrix is negative definite. In order to construct Bordered
Hessian matrix we need to derive second direct and cross partial derivatives using chain
rule.
𝑛 𝑛
2Y 𝑌
𝑓𝑖𝑖 = ∂ 2 = 2 [𝛽𝑖𝑖 + (𝛼𝑖 + ∑ 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln xj − 1) (𝛼𝑖 + ∑ 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln xj )
∂K 𝑥𝑖
𝑗=1 𝑗=1
2Y 𝑌
𝑓𝑖𝑗 = ∂ = [𝛽𝑖𝑗
∂xi ∂xj 𝑥𝑖 𝑥𝑗
𝑛
+ ∑ 𝛽𝑖𝑗 ln xi )
𝑖=1
The Bordered Hessian matrix is
0 𝑓1 ⋯ 𝑓𝑛
[𝑓1 𝑓11 ⋱ ⋮ ]
𝑓𝑛 ⋯ 𝑓𝑛𝑛
Here the values of the first and second partial derivatives vary with input levels, there
is no guarantee that the isoquants are globally convex.
7. Summary
\.
-
\ ..
I •
'11
f
i
I
- r
I . .' '
, -'
L-
- w
.,
.
I .
.
I
t
•
, .
• '
-.
.
''
- -
e
.\ -
. ' '
0
\ .
r • ••
--
- '
1
-;
' •
I
t
'
x
0 L
X
'
r J ••
I•
~ , t
~L
-
' . '
- -
..
. . II
..
.. .
,·
8. CHOICI OP OPTIMAL IXPANIION PATH
Wedilliquioh two cu.: apomioe of output wit11 oil l'lcton variable(the Jona nm~
ud apomioe o( output with - laclor(1) CODllallt (the lhort NII~
9)
ddlnool by the locuo of poinll of 11DfODCY or the iooquanll with ..-ivc poralld
ilocolt lina witll a olopo or w/r. Ir the ratio of the price, ;......., the ilocolt line,
. - Batter (r« eumpie, with • o1opo or.,,/r'I, ud the optimal aponaion poth will
be the otraipt line oa. or couroe, if the ratio or price, or r1Cton - iaitiolly .,,, ud
oubooqumtly ~ IO w'/r', the apomion poth cbanca: initiolly the flnn ...,_
aJoas OA, but after the chanp in the ractor price, it...,_ a1on1 OB.
Ir the produc:tion llmction ii ~ the optimal expomioe poth will DOI
be• llraiabt line, nm ii the ratio of price, or lacloro remain, comtant. 'l1lil ii lhown in
111,ft 3.-40. It ii due IO the lace that in equilibrium wc mllll equate the (CODllallt) w/r
ratio witll the AIIIS._., which ii the - 011 a ouned -iine ( - - 1 1 ) .
Fi,un l.41
EQUILIBRIUM OF A MULTIPRODUCT FIRM
Introduction
Equilibrium in a multiproduct firm refers to the optimal allocation of resources between the
production of different goods such that the firm’s revenue is maximized. This involves
determining the best combination of labour and capital to allocate to each product, ensuring that
the marginal rate of transformation between the products equals the ratio of their prices. By
analyzing production possibility curves and isorevenue curves, the firm can identify the most
efficient production levels that align with market prices and available resources.
A multi-product firm is a firm that produces more than one product.
For simplicity, we will consider a firm that makes two products, x and y. Given the inputs L and
K the firm employs, the choice of allocation of inputs becomes essential. The firm should choose
the quantity of labour and capital to be allocated to each output.
The firm produces the two products in such a way that the Marginal Rate of Transformation
between the products is equal to the ratio of their prices.
Tools used : Production possibility curve of the firm (production possibility curve is just another
way to express an isoquant) and Iso revenue curves.
Each product is assumed to be produced by two factors, L and K. With the given inputs, the firm
produces both goods in different proportions. If the quantity of good x is increased, then the
quantity of y should be reduced. The rate at which one good must be sacrificed to produce one
extra unit of the other good is called the Marginal Rate of Transformation.
x = f¹(L, K)
y = f²(L, K)
These production functions are represented with the help of isoquants derived from the
Edgeworth box.
OxL- total quantity of factor L (measured along the X axis of the Edgeworth box).
OxK- total quantity of factor K (measured along the y axis of the Edgeworth box).
Points on the Edgeworth box represent: combinations of quantities of x and y produced by the
available factors of production.
A¹, A², A³, A⁴…….A⁸- Isoquants of x (convex to the origin Ox)
B¹, B², B³, B⁴…….B⁸- Isoquants of y (convex to the origin Oy).
Only points lying on the contract curve are efficient, in the sense that any other point shows the
uses all resources for producing a combination of outputs which includes less quantity of at least
one commodity.
Production at points away from the contract curve
For example, assume that initially, the firm produces at point Z, at which the quantity of x is A³
and the quantity of y is B⁶. The production of level A³ of x absorbs OxL¹ of labor and OxK¹ of
capital. The remaining resources, L¹L and K¹K, are used in the production of commodity y.
Point C: It will attain higher levels of production of both x and y (isoquants near to B⁷ and A⁴).
Thus, points on the contract curve are efficient because any other point off this curve implies a
smaller level of output of at least one product.
The choice of the actual point on the contract curve depends on the ratio of the prices of the two
commodities.
Production-possibility curve is derived from the contract curve. Each point of tangency between
isoquants, that is, any one point of the contract curve, defines a combination of x and y levels of
output which lies on the production-possibility curve. For example, point V, representing the
output pair A³ from x and B⁷ from y, is point V’ in the below figure. Similarly, point W of the
contract curve is point W’ on the production-possibility curve. The optimal combination of the
output pair is the one which yields the highest revenue, given the production-possibility curve,
that is, given the total quantities of factors which define this curve.
Assuming that the quantity of the factors and their prices are given, then maximization of π is
achieved by maximizing the revenue, R. Graphically, the equilibrium of the firm is defined by
the point of tangency of the given product-transformation curve and the highest isorevenue
curve. At the point of tangency, the slopes of the isorevenue and the product-transformation
curves are equal.
Conclusion
In conclusion, achieving equilibrium in a multiproduct firm requires careful resource allocation
to balance the production of multiple goods. By ensuring that the marginal rate of transformation
between products equals the ratio of their prices, the firm can maximize its revenue. The use of
production possibility curves and isorevenue curves is essential in identifying the most efficient
production combinations, ultimately leading to optimal profitability given the available resources
and market conditions.
MODERN THEORY OF COST
ENGINEERING COST – MULTI PRODUCT FIRMS AND
DYNAMIC CHANGES IN COSTS (Learning Curve)
* Firms build industrial plants with some flexibility in their productive capacity so that
instead of a single output level, there is a whole range of output that can be produced
optimally at low cost unlike the traditional theory of cost.
For each phase the quantities of factors of production are estimated and finally the cost of
each phase is calculated on the basis of the prevailing factor [Link] total cost of the
particular method of production is the sum of the costs of its different phases.
Such calculations are done for all available plant sizes. Production isoquants are
subsequently estimated, and from them, given the factor prices, the short-run and the
long-run cost functions may be derived.
It should be noted that engineering production functions and the cost functions derived
from them refer usually to the production costs and do not include the administrative
costs for the operation of any given plant.
It is assumed that there is a fixed factor of production which requires a minimum outlay, and
that there is some reserve capacity in the plant. The total-cost curve under these assumptions
will be as in figure 4.27.
For the range OX 1 the TC is formed from linear segments, with the slope of each segment
constant, but increasing for successive segments. The ends of linear segments correspond to
outputs at which one process is replaced by another.
(a) Along each linear segment the slope is the MC. Along the first segment (AB) the MC =
AVC. For each successive section (that is, for sections BC and CD) the MC > AVC. The
marginal cost increases step-
wise while the AVC increases
smoothly, at a decreasing rate.
We said that the engineering costs include generally only the technical cost of production.
Thus diseconomies of large scale, which are associated with administration costs, are not
encountered here. There is a minimum optimal size of plant for each production process. The
TC, AC and MC are shown in figures 4.29 and 4.30.
If we assume that there is a very large number of processes, the total and unit cost curves
become continuous (smooth) but retain broadly the above shapes, provided that there is a
minimum fixed outlay and some reserve capacity in the short run (figures 4.31 and 4.32). In
the long run the LAC will not turn upwards if we are considering only production costs; but if
we add the administrative costs and if there are strong managerial diseconomies, the LAC will
rise at very large scales of output (figures 4.33 and 4.34).
We simplify the exposition by assuming that the firm produces two products, X and Y. The analysis
can easily be extended to any number of products.
A. THE PRODUCTION-POSSIBILITY CURVE OF THE FIRM
Each product is assumed to be produced by two factors, Land K. For each product we
have a production function.
Each production function may be presented by a set of isoquants with the usual
properties. We may now obtain the production-possibility curve of the firm by using
the device of the Edge worth box. We assume that the firm has total quantities of
factors OL and OK (figure 3.45) measured along the sides of the Edge worth box.
Any point of the Edge worth box shows a certain combination of quantities of x and y
produced by the available factors of production. The production function for
commodity x is represented by the set of isoquants denoted by A which are convex to
the origin Ox. The production function for commodity y is represented by the set of
isoquants denoted by B which are convex to the origin 07 . The further down an
isoquant B lies, the higher the quantity of y it represents. The two sets of isoquants
have points of tangency, which form the contract curve. Only points lying on the
contract curve are efficient, in the sense that any other point shows the use of all
resources for producing a combination of outputs which includes less quantity of at
least one commodity. For example, assume that initially the firm produces at point Z,
at which the quantity of x is A3 and the quantity of y is B6. The production of the
level A3 of x absorbs OxL1 of labour and OxK 1 of capital. The remaining resources,
L 1 Land K 1 K, are used in the production of commodity y.
It can be shown that the firm can produce more of either x or y or of both
commodities by reallocating its resources so as to move to any point between V and
Won the contract curve.
If the firm moves to W it will be producing the same level of y (B6), but a higher level of x
(A4). If the firm chooses to produce at V, it will produce the same quantity of x (A3), but
more of y (B7). Finally, if the firm produces at any intermediate point between V and W, for
example at point C, it will attain higher levels of production of both x and y. Thus points on
the contract curve are efficient in that any other point off this curve implies a smaller level of
output of at least one product.
The choice of the actual point on the contract curve depends on the ratio of the prices of the
two commodities (see below).
As management and labour gain experience with production, the firm’s marginal and average
costs of producing a given level of output fall for four reasons:
1) Workers often take longer to accomplish a given task the first few times they do it. As
they become more adept, their speed increases.
2) Managers learn to schedule the production process more effectively, from the flow of
materials to the organization of the manufacturing itself.
3) Engineers who are initially cautious in their product designs may gain enough
experience to be able to allow for tolerances in design that save costs without
increasing defects. Better and more specialized tools and plant organization may also
lower cost.
4) Suppliers may learn how to process required materials more effectively and pass on
some of this advantage in the form of lower costs.
As a consequence, a firm “learns” over time as cumulative output increases. Managers can
use this learning process to help plan production and forecast future costs. Figure 7.12
illustrates this process in the form of a learning curve— a curve that describes the
relationship between a firm’s cumulative output and the amount of inputs needed to produce
each unit of output.
GRAPHING THE LEARNING CURVE:
Figure 7.13 shows a learning curve for the production of machine tools. The horizontal axis
measures the cumulative number of lots of machine tools (groups of approximately 40) that
the firm has produced.
The vertical axis shows the number of hours of labour needed to produce each lot. Labour
input per unit of output directly affects the production cost because the fewer the hours of
labour needed, the lower the marginal and average cost of production.
Where N is the cumulative units of output produced and L the labour input per unit of output.
A, B, and b are constants, with A and B positive, and b between 0 and 1. When N is equal to
1, L is equal to A + B, so that A + B measures the labour input required to produce the first
unit of output. When b equals 0, labour input per unit of output remains the same as the
cumulative level of output increases; there is no learning. When b is positive and N gets
larger and larger, L becomes arbitrarily close to A. A, therefore, represents the minimum
labour input per unit of output after all learning has taken place. The larger b is, the more
important the learning effect. With b equal to 0.5, for example, the labour input per unit of
output falls proportionately to the square root of the cumulative output. This degree of
learning can substantially reduce production costs as a firm becomes more experienced.
In this machine tool example, the value of b is 0.31. For this particular learning curve, every
doubling in cumulative output causes the input requirement (less the minimum attainable
input requirement) to fall by about 20 percent. As Figure 7.13 shows, the learning curve
drops sharply as the cumulative number of lots increases to about 20. Beyond an output of 20
lots, the cost savings are relatively small.