Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 45

WID Handbook for

Intermediate Laboratory - Physics 2151W
Writing Physics Papers

Dr. Igor Strakovsky

Department of Physics, GWU

Publish or Perish - Presentation of Scientific Results

Intermediate Laboratory – Physics 2151W is focused on significantly improving the students'

writing skills with respect to producing scientific papers, to do peer reviews, and presentations at
the Physics Department Mini-Workshop.

Third Edition, 2013

 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 46

OUTLINE

 Why are we Writing Papers?

 What Physics Journals are there?
 Structure of a Physics Article.
 Style of Technical Papers.
 Hints for Effective Writing.
 Submit and Fight.

Why are We Writing Papers?

 To communicate our original, interesting, and useful research.

 To let others know what we are working on (and that we are working
at all.)
To organize our thoughts.
 To formulate our research in a comprehensible way.
To secure further funding.
 To further our careers.
 To make our publication lists look more impressive.
 To make our Citation Index very impressive.
 To have fun?
 Because we believe someone is going to read it!!!
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 47

What Physics Journals are there?

Hard Science Journals  Physical Review Series:

 Physical Review A  Physical Review E

http://pra.aps.org/ http://pre.aps.org/
Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics. Stat, Non-Linear, &
Soft Material Phys.
 Physical Review B  Physical Review Letters
http://prb.aps.org/ http://prl.aps.org/
Condensed matter and Materials physics. Moving physics forward.
Physical Review C  Review of Modern Physics
http://prc.aps.org/ http://rmp.aps.org/
Nuclear physics. Reviews in all areas.
 Physical Review D
http://prd.aps.org/
Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology.
[Physical Review commenced publication in July 1893. It was organized by Cornell University professor
E. Nichols and helped by the new President of Cornell, J. G. Schurman. The journal was managed and
edited at Cornell in upstate New York from 1893 to 1913 by Nichols, E. Merritt, and F. Bedell.]

Applied Physics Series

 Journal of Applied Physics  Applied Physics Letters

http://jap.aip.org http://apl.aip.org
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 48

Hard Science Journals  European Physics Journal Series:

 EPJ A  EPJ E
http://epja.edpsciences.org/ http://epje.edpsciences.org/
Hadrons and Nuclei. Soft Matter.

 EPJ B  Europhysics Letters

http://epjb.edpsciences.org/ http://epljornal.edpsciences.org/
Condensed matter & Complex systems. Frontiers of physics.

 EPJ C
http://epjc.edpsciences.org/
Particles and Fields.

 EPJ D  Physics Letters B

http://epjd.edpsciences.org/ http://www.elsevier.com/wps
Atomic, Molecular, Optical, & Nuclear physics and Particle
Plasma physics. physics.

[From the time of its creation in 1845, the Physical Society of Berlin (Physikalische Gesellschaft zu
Berlin) published Fortschritte der Physik and Verhandlungen, but by 1919, the Verhandlungen had
become too voluminous, so a committee consisting of A.Einstein, E. Goldstein, Fr. Haber, E. Jahnke, K.
Scheel and W. Westphal was formed.]
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 49

Nature and Science

 Nature:  Science:
http://www.nature.com http://www.sciencemag.org

Soft Science Journals

 Physics Today:
http://www.physicstoday.org/
Official journal of APS, good review articles and research news.

 Physics World:  Scientific American:

http://physicsworld.com/cws/home http://www.sciam.com/
IOP, good review articles. Popular science articles.

American Journal of Physics:

http://scitation.aip.org/ajp/
Pedagogical physics research articles.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 53

Preprint Archive

Free, Fast, Referee free, Money free

arXiv has become the most widely used preprint server among
academics in the physical sciences.

http://arxiv.org/ arXiv:1108.2700

Open access to 694,518 e-prints in Physics, Mathematics, Computer

Science, Quantitative Biology, Quantitative Finance and Statistics

[It received more than 60,000 new submissions in 2009, has about
400,000 registered users and provides 2.5 million articles download per
month.]
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 54

Structure of a Physics Article

Short Letters (PRL, APL, Rapid Communications …)

[1 – 4 pages]

 Title.
 Abstract.
Homogeneous body includes introduction and acknowledgments.
 References.
 0-4 figures/tables.
 At most paragraph titles.

Regular Articles
[4 – 500+ pages]

 Title.
 Abstract.
 Introduction.
 Body sections.
 Conclusions/Summary.
 Acknowledgments.
 References.
 Appendices.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 55

Title

Informative, Catchy, and Concise.

Abstract

Concise, Direct, Informative.

Passive or Active voice?  I prefer active, though in longer abstracts an

occasional active assertion may be enlivening.

``We have measured ...” or ``We have calculated ...” - What you should
not do is use both in the same abstract.

 Abstracts are now more important than ever due to the large and
increasing number of articles. One cannot read all the papers in each
issue of PRL, not even in ones own field. Abstracts should state
major findings, even some specifics (numbers, formulas showing
basic trends.)

 Please keep the number of words under 250.

Abstract has to have a punch-line.

After reading the abstract professionals not acquainted with your work
should understand what your experiment goal was and the
concept/principle you used to achieve this goal.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 56

Example of Abstract

[Prof Burton Richter is a 1976 Nobel Laureate in Physics for their pioneering
work in the discovery of a new kind of heavy elementary particle, J/]
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 57

Introduction

 Give the first impression about the paper.

Place the work into broader context.
 Relate to other relevant research.
 Say why is the work important, in plain language.
 State major achievement/limitations.
 State techniques/methods.
 Describe organization of the paper.

Example of Introduction
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 58

Body of the Paper

Describe your findings in an organized, structured, and logical way:

 Think about the organization ahead of actual writing.

 Create informative headings helping easy orientation.

Conclusions

 Give your article closure.

 Summary of major results.
 Prospects for future extensions.
 Possible applications, relevance to other works, fields.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 59

Conclusions including Example of References

 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 61

Style of Technical papers

Guidelines explained in detail in:

American Institute of Physics (AIP) Style Manual

www.aip.org/pubservs/style/4thed/AIP_Style_4thed.pdf

Tools: LaTeX

Text, Equations, Figures, Tables, References

LaTeX : http://www.latex-project.org/

REVTeX 4

To compile Phys. Rev. Style documents: http://authors.aps.org/revtex4/

TeX archive network: http://www.ctan.org/ctan

 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 63

Hint 1

Pick a published paper you like and try to emulate its structure and style.

Learn from eminent physics writers.

Some of my favorite physics writings are:

 S. Weinberg: Relativity and Cosmology
R. Feynman, R. Leighton, and M. Sands: Feynman Lectures in Physics
 L. Landau and E. Lifschitz: Course in Theoretical Physics (*)

(*)
I would not recommend emulating the style of L&L in research
papers, unless you can emulate their physics.

Hint 2

Understand what you write, be clear:

 Distance yourself from the writing to see it unbiased.

 Logic must flow.
 Ask a colleague if in doubt that writing may be incomprehensible.

Useful point: Do not write ``The energy increases with pressure”, but
``The energy increases with increasing pressure”, to be clear, since one
can often mean the opposite (``At low fields the rate decreases” can
mean that the rate increases with decreasing fields, but one never
knows.)
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 64

Hint 3

Structuring into ideas = Structuring into paragraphs.

 Place clue sentences in the beginning.

 Read the paragraph and rewrite it if the logic does not flow.

Hint 4

Write in Active voice.

``I show that the process occurs.” Or ``These results show that …”
(NO: It is shown by these results that …)

 What you should not do is use both in the same abstract.

Be concise, precise, and direct.
 Stay focused (not shift your point of view.)
 Do not put statements in the negative form.

Hint 5

Be consistent.

If there is an allowed ambiguity, stick to your choice throughout the

paper:
For example, ``We take five configurations for the microstate. Each
microstate is defined by …”
Either pick microstate or configuration, some may get confused.

 Similarly with grammar:

For example, if you describe an experiment in the past sense, do not
switch randomly to the present one.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 65

Hint 6

Avoid if possible words like:

Clearly.
 Obviously.
 As is well known.
 Of course.
 Last but not least, avoid cliches like the plague; seek viable
alternatives.

Hint 7

Read the guidelines:

 Early in your professional life read the guidelines for authors to the
journal you write for.

Adhere to the most relevant points in future writings.

Hint 8

Do not overdo:

 Footnotes.
 In-line equations.
 References.
 Figures.
 Latin (Greek and so on) phrases.
Acronyms.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 66

Hint 9

Referring:

 Include only equations, figures, tables, and references that you refer to
 Carefully define every term in equations.
 Define all the lines and symbols in figures.
 Each figure and table comes with a caption.
 Number all equations (if needed.)
 All nontrivial statements should be explained or referenced.

Hint 10

Revise 5-10 times:

Spell check.
Grammar check (including backward reading.)
 Check for flow.
 Shorten.
 Give the paper to a colleague for opinion.
 Stop revising after a revision eliminates a previous revision, or if you
are revising 10th time.
There is a little chance you will improve anything.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 69

1. Practice writing short summaries of longer articles

(get the message out.)

2. Combine writing with inspiring reading

(emulate the style of your favorite writing.)

3. Get rid of superfluous words

(there is …, the fact that …)

4. Rewrite if it is not clear.

5. Define your terms.

6. Good writing is clear thinking.

None of these rules are new. They are like the simple rule to tennis
players: ``Keep your eye on the ball”. The players all know the rule, but
the challenge is to consistently follow it. And having completed this
little piece, I wonder which of the above rules I have violated in writing
it.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 71

Submit & Fight

Submission Letter

Dear Editor,

We submit a manuscript entitled ``Falling cats with jelly on the back:

stable equilibrium versus instinct”, by Schroedinger and Einstein, for
publication in Physical Review Letters. The manuscript considers the
important problem of cats with a jelly spread on their back. The cats are
left to fall free from a height of at least 50 cm, and observed in their fall.
We have discovered that cats do not fall. Instead, they hover
indefinitely. Our conclusions have far reaching consequences for both
physics and biology. We are now pondering about what happens to the
cats when they are entangled.

The importance of our work as well as far reaching consequences of our

discovery justify our manuscript to be considered for publication in
Physical Review Letters. Below we suggest physicists who should be
qualified to referee our work.

Sincerely,
E. Schroedinger
A. Einstein

Suggested referees: N. Bohr (Copenhagen), L. Boltzman (Graz),

L. Landau (Moscow)
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 72

Referee Reports

Re: Falling cats with jelly …

By: Schroedinger and Einstein

Dear Dr. Schroedinger:

The above manuscript has been reviewed by our referee(s). On the basis
of the enclosed critique, we judge that the work does not meet the
special criteria of importance and broad interest required for Physical
Review Letters. We also wish to emphasize that we take strong stance
on the animal rights issue and we do not endorse experimenting with
live animals, with or without jelly on their back.

Yours sincerely,
E. Rutherford
Senior Editor
Encl. Referee reports
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 73

Referee A

This paper presents an experimental treatment of combined effects of

mechanical rotation and animal instincts. The treatment is sound, but
cruel. I question the conclusions of the manuscript on the basis that the
authors used only 1 cat which must have felt depressed about being
thrown repeatedly from the Physics Department windows. As is known
from the work of Darwin, depressed cats tend to hover in the air. The
authors have failed to separate the effects of depression from those of
mechanical rotation and biological instincts. Therefore, I do not
recommend the paper for publication in Physical Review Letters in the
present form, although the subject itself is of great importance.

Referee B

The group of Dr. Schroedinger publishes reliable and interesting results

(though I have some doubts about Dr. Einstein who tends to be off at
time). The paper is well written, the results clearly stated. The subject is
definitely of broad interest, as I have myself pondered about such things.
The only question I have is whether the work is suitable for Physical
Review Letters, or should be published in the ``American Journal of
Falling Cats”? I opt for the latter
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 74

Resubmission Letter

Dear Editor,

We resubmit our manuscript entitled ``Falling cats with jelly on the

back: stable equilibrium versus instinct”, by Schroedinger and Einstein,
for publication in Physical Review Letters. We consider the criticism of
the referees well meant, and in fact supporting publication in your
journal. Referee A says ``The treatment is sound …” and ``… is of great
importance”. Referee B claims that the paper is well written and of
broad interest. We address the few minor critical points in the enclosed
response to the referees. Since we have addressed ALL the referee
comments, and since the comments themselves can be interpreted as
positive, we strongly request that you publish our manuscript without
further delay.

Sincerely,
E. Schroedinger
A. Einstein
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 75

Response to the Referees

Response to referee A: We thank the referee for his or her thoughtful

comments and for careful reading our manuscript. We were not aware
of the important research of Darwin on falling cats. Taking into
consideration that our cat could have indeed been depressed by both
falling down so often and having jelly on the back, and so not wanting to
really fall down, we have put the cat on an antidepressant (Whiskas
Prozac) and let it fall several times again. We are happy to report that
our original results stay unchanged. Unfortunately, the poor cat has
died. Probably from an overdose of Prozac.

Response to referee B: We appreciate the referee’s well thought

comments and for suggesting an alternative journal for our manuscript.
We have looked at several recent issues of AJFC to see if indeed this
would be the appropriate place for our cat. Unfortunately, AJFC seems
to publish only very technical papers on the subject, with little emphasis
on the physics involved. We strongly believe that PRL is the most
suitable journal for publishing our work.
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 76

Acceptance (rejection) Letter

Re: Falling cats with jelly …

By: Schroedinger and Einstein

Dear Dr. Schroedinger:

We are pleased to inform you that the above manuscript has been
accepted for publication. You are requested to make a payment of
$1000 toward the cost of disseminating your research results.

Yours sincerely,
E. Rutherford
Senior Editor
 Physics 2151W Lab Manual | Page 77

Reading about Physics Writing

 M. Alley, The craft of scientific writing, 3rd Edition (Springer NY,

1996)

 B. Goss Levi, Some simple rules of writing,

http://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/199806/rules.cfm

 D. Mermin, What’s wrong with this prose? Physics Today, May 1989,
p. 9

 D. Mermin, What’s wrong with this equations? Physics Today, Oct.

1989, p. 9

 D. Mermin, Writing physics,

http://www.lassp.cornell.edu/~cew2/KnightLecture.html

 A. Waldron, P. Judd, and V. Miller, Physical Review stile and notation

guide, http://publish.aps.org/STYLE

 H.F. Ebel, C. Bliefert, and W.E. Russey, The art of scientific writing
(VCH NY, 1987)