Government of Tamil Nadu

e-Couct Eog

1 District : Cuddalore Date & Time :10-JUL-2025 15:00:34

Establishment : Principal District Court, Cuddalore

Stockholding Reference No : EPSTN1034070016121671

Party Transaction No: NTNCD012025554426L

Name of litigant: Mohan

e-Court Fee Receipt No : TNOT1040G2501P582

e-Court Fee amnount: Rs. 50

(Rupees Fifty And Paise Zero Only)

TNCT1040G2501P582

Statutory Alert: The authenticity of this e-Court fee receipt should be verified at
discrepancy in the details on this receipt and as available on the website renderswww.shcilestamp.com . Any
it invalid. In case of any
discrepancy please inform the Competent Authority. This receipt is required to be verified &locked by
Court official for further process in the Court. the
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAI, DISTDICT .JUDGE AT CUDDALORE
/2025
Crl.M.P.No.
1. Mohan (age-42),
s/oRanganathan,
2. Jayashri(age-32),
W/o Mohan,
Petitioners are residing at:
No. 1/66, Reddy Street,
Thookanampakkam Village and post,
Cuddalore Taluk.
--- Petitioners/Accused

/Vs /
S.H.O,
Thookanampakkam P.S,
Cr.No.65/2025 Respondent/ Complainant

ANTICIPATORY BAIL PETITION FILED U/S.482 BNSS

1) The petitioners most respectfully submit that they are accused for
the alleged offences U/Sec. 332 (c) & 305 of BNS on the file of
respondent police. The alleged date of occurrence is 20.05.2025. The

FIR is registered on 03.07.2025 and the same is pending on the file of

Judicial Magistrate No. I, Cuddalore.
2) The petitioners herein apprehend arrest and ill-treatment at the
hands of respondent police. The petitioners are innocent of the alleged
occurrence and they are falsely implicated in this case with ulterior
motives, The petitioners are no way connected with the said offence. In
fact the petitioners did not involve in any occurrence as alleged in the
FIR.

3) The petitioners further submit that the defacto complainant is

brother of the 1st petitioner and 24 peuuoner is wife of 1st petitioner. In
fact there is a civil dispute in respect of their family prroperty and there is
a contempt petition is pending as aginst the defacto comnlainont in A
No: 28/2024 in 0.S No: 18oT0 e tle of Principal District
Munsif. Cuddalore. The copy ol ue 1s herewith filed and it may
read as part and parcel of this petition.
4) The petitioners further submt e l tne defacto complainant is a
political influence person. Th1s Case s oting but a counter blast of
the FIR No: 39/2025 on the me o reSpondent police. which is
registered on 6-5-2025 as against the defacto complainant and his
wife namely Roselin. The copy or the rik 1s herewith filed and it mav be
read as part and parcel of this petition.
5) The petitioners further submit that the defacto complainant is trying
to take forcible possession and get D.B Connection by i1legal means
and the same is successfully restricted by the petitioners and in this
regard a legal notice also issued on 29-04-2025 to E.B Department and
thereafter the E.B Department refused to give E.B Connection to the
defacto complainant. The copy of the notice is herewith filed and it may
be read as part and parcel of this petition. The Electricity connection for
the dispute property stands in the name of 1st petitioner and a copy of
E.B receipt is herewith filed and it may be read as part and parcel of
this petition.
6) The petitioners further submit that the property involved in the
dispute belongs to the petitioners and the patta for the property
stands in the name of 1st petitioner, The copy of thepatta is herewith
filed and it may be read as part and parcel of this petiti0n.
7) It is further submitted that the defacto complainant has failed
in all his attempts to take
forcible possession and got aggrieved by
the same he has lodged a false case against the petitioners and on
the basis of the false complaint the respondent police tried to settle
 he matter amicably, but the
defacto complainant very particular
cegister a false case against the tO
petitioners due to escape fron the
earlier case registered as against the
defacto complainant and his
wife as stated above. Now the
defacto complainant lockedthe house
of the petitioners by using his
influence and the petitioners are
staving out of their residential home.
8) It is further submitted that the petitioners are
law abiding cit2en
and having permanent place of residence. The petitioners
undertake that
they will neither tamper the witness nor hamper the
progress of the
prosecution case.
9 The petitioners will not abscond and undertake to appear when and
where the court orders to do so. The petitioners are willing to abide by
any condition imposed by this Hon'ble court.
10) It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to
release the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest and thus render
justice.
Place: Cuddalore
Date: 09.07.2025 Counsel for petitioners/ Accused
LIST OF DOCUMENTS

1. Office copy of contempt petition in E.A No: 28/2024 in O.S

No. 188/2012 on the file of Principal District Munsif, Cuddalore.
2. Copy of FIR No: 39/2025 dated 6-5-2025.
3. Office copy of legal notice issued to EB department dated 29-04-2025.
4. Xerox copy of E..B receipt stands in the name of 1st petitioner.
5. Web copy of patta in the name of 1st petitioner dated 09-07-2025.
6. Copy of photo.

dounsel for petitioners

 K. ANANDHA VEL B.A.LL.B.,
ADVOCATE TOR PETITIONERS

IN THE cOURT OF PRINCIPAL

DISTRICT JUDGE AT CUDDALORE

Crl.M.P.No. /2025
1, Mohan (age-42),
8/o Ranganathan,
2. Jayashri (age-32),
W/o Mahan
Petitioners/Accused
|Vs /
8.H.0,
Thaokanampakkam P.S,
Cr.No.65/2025
Respondent/ Complainant
ANTICIPATORY BAIL PETITION
FILED U/S.482 BNSS
 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF,
CUDDALORE
E.A.No.8 of 2024 in 0,S. 188 of 2012

1) Ranganathan Petitioners/
2) Mohan Defendants

Vs

Respondents/Plaintiff
Elango
AFFIDAVIT OF MOHAN
I, Mohan, son of Ranganathan, Hindu, aged about 42
and residing at 1/66, Reddy Street, Thookanampakkam
Village and Post, Cuddalore Taluk, do solemnly affirmn and

state as follows:

1) Iam the 2nd petitioner herein. 1st petitioner is my

father. I am swearing to this affidavit on behalf of 2nd

petitioner also.

2) Iam the 1st petitioner's son born to the 2nd wife.

Respondent is 1st petitioner'sson born to his 1st wife

3) The property descr1bed n the petition is a bouee

property and item 1 in the sult. hamittedly, myself and 1st

petitioner are living in the suit property. Respondent is

living in Puducherry State for
the past more than 30 years.
 2

The
the
respondent filed the
above suit against us.
4)
The prayer in the plaint was an 1julcion not to alienate the
strict:
suit properties and from preventung the respondent from
ct(s)
entering item 1 of the suit property, namely the property
HE B
HE B
N PF
described in the petition. After contest, decree was passed
(a) (
( on 10.03.2014 granting the above reliefs. We filed A.S 75 of
Tim
2014 but the Sub-Court, Cuddalore, dismissed the appeal
(b

on 29.04.2019.
4.
5) Taking advantage of the decree, the respondent
5.
has been attempting to capture the property. But, that is
not the decree. Moreover, the respondent is not entitled to
the property absolutely. Apart fromn that, the decree was
granted only against the 1st petitioner and not against me.
Therefore, there is no injunction against me.
6) The property in dispute, along with other
properties, belonged to Kamalammal, mother of ]st
petitioner, my grand-mother. She has settled the properties
giving absolute right to myself and respondent. 1* petitioner
has been given life estate. Therefore, the respondent cannot
 3
disturb our poSsession, He can, at best, Come to the house

However, he cannot disturb our possession.

7) We have already fled 0,s. 235 of 2020 in the

Principal District Court, Cuddalore., against the respondent
and Rajam to whom the respondent has sold away the
landed properties subject matter of the settlement deed, for
The suit has been
partition and separate possession.
transferred to the Additional District Court, Cuddalore and

is pending. However the respondent has no right to disturb

our possession. He cannot come and live in the house nor

in the
can he bring and place his house-hold articles

property. But, the respondent comes very often

fully drunk

front of the house. Making false

and creates ugly scenes in

averment, the respondent filed . . 44 of

2020 alleging as if

have committed contempt and seeking arrest. During

we
advocates
Could not come to court and
Covid period, when
to court, when courts were
could not come
even 1st petitioner
adverse orders, the 1st petitioner
advised to avoid passing

10.2020
and set ex-parte. Arrest
was called absent on 12.
 4 abus
Subsequently, exparte order was set
was ordered. aside and

again arrest was ordered.

Now, the 1st petitioner has

has already served the jail
8)
term and has been released.

9) However, it may be seen that though there is no

order against me, I have been unnecessarily impleaded in
the E.P.. Isought exoneration but respondent did not even

bring the truth to the knowledge of the court. After putting

my father, 1st petitioner in jail at the age of 84, the

respondent came to the property almost daily. He came

with hooligans.
He has forcibly placed a bureau, with
clothes and has brought house-hold articles and
placed
them in the house.
He also fixed an AC machine and
C.C.T.V. Cameras inside the house He has
constructed an
additional bathroom and toilet
Ihad to go for work and
only my mother, wife, 10 years
old girl child and son were in
the house. They were threatened. The police also
threatened us of filing false
Cases. Some person claiming to
be an advocate has
been creating havoc and throwing
 5
In view of the
abuses.
order of arrest passed by this court

we could
not do anything else.
11) As already stated there is no decree permitting the
respondent to come and live in the house nor has he the
right to disturb our possession. But, he has abused the

decree obtained by him and has committed perjury. This is

also an act of Contempt of the order of this court. We have

been put to immense agony and torture over the last 4 years

unable
and especially over the last over one month. We are
is
to live peacefully in this house. Hence, this application
filed to punish the respondent for perjury and for contempt
of this Court.

llegally and forcibly

12) The respondent has also
AC machine and CC TV
placed house-hold articles, bureau,

cameras in the house.

In short, he has made all

and reside in the house. At any time

come
arrangements to
house.
he is into the
likely to barge
movables brought into the house
all
13) Therefore,
The placing of movables is
have to be removed.
ante
has to be restored.
Quo
Unauthorised. Status
 6

14) It is, therefore, prayed that the respondent may be

issued notice of perjury and of contempt of the order of this

Court and suitably punished and consequently he may be
directed to remove all the movables placed by him in the
property after filing EP 44 of 2020 and such further or other
orders as are deemed fit may be passed.

Solemnly affirmed before

me this the 5th day of
February 2024 after Before me
admitting the contents of
this affidavit to be true and
correct and signed in my
presence at Cuddalore. Advocate,
Cuddalore.
 7

IN THE COURT OF
THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF,
CUDDALORE
E.A.No, of 2024
in 0.S. 188 of 2012

1) Ranganathan
Petitioners/
2) Mohan Defendants
Vs

Elango Respondents/Plaintiff

PETITION UNDER SECTION 151 CPC READ WITH SECTION

12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT

For the reasons stated in the accompanying afidavit, it

1s prayed that the respondent may be issued notice of

perjury and of contempt of the order of this Court and

Suitably punished and consequently he may be directed to

remove all the movables placed by him in the property after
filing EP 44 of 2020 and such further or other orders as are

deemed fit may be passed.

Advocate
GleTHSI olugLi
 .105/1 - 4.95.0 Gtero. LU60
siGou Gl 317/C11 soi eibDjSJULLg0 SnTLUIaofl Gleligunt
LDGDSUT `HGù pag, GsG4SGÜ Guome. QlouriesLLJIUGOOT
GiyLlgum0d LDGD60TH(GÜ LS,
AsbGatLuLL. gag-GuodG gTHW 80, GlsDG6JL`G pTflutg

DGSGÜ Raut oitUL GsDG6 ö5 gT5luile 47 Ag, GuyTD 48

g slpHG-GomG grslug E56ÜE-ouft 96iTUL GS6od LyTLD 30 JL;TLD 30

Advocate

List of Documents filed

1)10.03.2014 Certified copy of decree in 0.S 188 of 2012.

2)17.03.2020 Certified copv of EP 44 of 2020 1n
O.S 188 of 2012

3) Photos wik

Advbcate
 FIRST INFORMATION REPORT TAMIL NADUPOLICE
INTEGRATED INVESTIGATION FORM-I
(Under Section 154 Cr.P.C)
GB al.a5.Nflay 154 9 ) C 13769780
1. District: CUDDALORE PS: THOOKKANAMPYear:
2025 FIR No. 39 Date 06-05-2025
AKKAM
2.Act(s)
Sections
19flajbG
THE BHARATIYA NYA YA SANHITA (BNS). 2023 296(b)
THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA (BNS), 2023 115(2)
TN PROHIBITION OF HARASSMENT OF WOMEN ACT. 4
2002
3. (a) Occurrence of Offence Day: TUESDAY
Date From:06-05-2025 Date To:
Time Period: On
Time from: 11.45 Hrs Time To:

(b) Intormation reccived at PS 06-05-2025 Time: 12.30 Hrs (c) General Diary Reference: Entry Nos)
Date:

Time:
4. Type of Information:wRITTEN

5.Placc of Occurrence: (a) Direction and Distance from PS: & 0.5 Beat Number: BEAT-I
EAST Km

(b) Address: angun ai yça sa1 LDL Hisin

(c) In case, outsido limit of this Policc Station,thon tho Namne of P.S:
Dist

6. Complainant/Informant (a) Name: JAYASHRI (c) Date/Year of Birth: 1993

(d) Natior:ity: INDA
(b) Father's/Husband's Name : MOHAN

(e) Passport No.: Datc of Issue: Place of Issue:

(1) Occupation:

(g) Addrcss: NO. 197 REDDIYAR STREET. THOOKANAMPAKKAM, CUDDALORE TK

1. Deias of Known/Suspected/Unknown accused with full particulars

1) ROSELIN(WIO) ELANGO. THOOKANAMPAKKAM

2)ELANGO(S/O) RENGANATHAN. THOOKANAMPAKKAM

8. Reasons for delay in reporting by the complainant/fornant:

NO DELAY

9. Particulars of the pr0pcrties

stolcn/lnvolvo0:
alunhgicbuallsor oflaujd.

10. Total value of

propertics stolen/involved
11. Inquest Report/ It any
Un-natural death Casc No.

240-1(Type-1) 20,70,200+3 Cps-23-12-2022-(HP47-1)

 13
AC

12. FIR Contents :

8DT968çLGEDE: ag06.05.2025

s£56LbUT`ED, 5Lgi LDTaJLLiD 305b562741, 9787065172 Qun: 2 3a 2,u 16 ITGrT

aubs Gy 5/05/2025 g,LD G GLDIT0 11.45 DasfluUarGla 5rGt G`L gá s6ofluurrES 5b5 Gurs

i G4s16) GgGar gise, (sd) xXX. M. layashree Goju4 aitlull yhi DGINa Quon
,h,1i u6519 51a6) oaU) (6n GlGiol, 39/2025 U/S 296(b). 115(2) r/w 4 of TNPWH Act
13. Actior
Taken: Since the abOve
UTHRAMMAL report reveals
case and
Directed
R,SUB INSPECTOR OFCommission of Offence(s) u/s as mentioned in item No.2, registered
POLICE to took up the investigation.
ThRAMMAL R. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE

PO read over t0 ne
Complainant/informant freeompiainant/intormant,
of cOst admittod to ho corroctiy recorded and
a copy given To the

14. Signature / Thumb Impression of the 2)52

Complainant/lntormant OfficèY in-charge, Policc Station

Name SAMINATHAN J
15. Date & Time of despatch to the court: 06-05-2025

Rank HC No.: 2152

Gi 6881
From
29.04.2025

R.Gururaj,
Advocate,
No.64-A, Main Road,
Pudupalayam,
Cuddalore- 1.
(For and on behalf of Mohan son of Ranganathan Padayachi,
197, Reddiar Street, Thookanambakkam, Cuddalore Taluk)

To

1) The Superintending Engineer.

TANGEDCO, Capper Quarry.
Cuddalore Taluk.

2) The Assistant Engineer (Rural),

TANGEDCO, Kuttiyankuppam,
Cuddalore Taluk

Sirs,

aforesaid I issue you the

On instructions from my client

following notice
Door No.197, Reddiar Street,
1) My client is living at
Thookkanambakkam, Cuddalore Taluk. He is living with his
The house is
living with him.
family. His father is also
connection No.02
Provided with domestic electricity service

024-001-349.
brother lango is
living at No.68, 2nd
2) My client's step
Muthialpet, Puducherry-3.
It is an
Kattumanikuppam,
rloor, litigations.
address given by in all
admitted fact and it is the
 2

Mclient has filed O.S.No.Z30 OI Z020 along with his fatther. for

partition and separate possession of 1/2 share. My client's

residential house is item I ne suit. For want to Presiding
Officer the trial of the case 15 being delayed. Now the vacancy
has been filled up so that the casSe is likely to be taken up after
vacation.

3) There is no order against my client tovacate nor has

any court allowed my client's brother to live in the house. But,
Ilango is causing disturbance to my client and his family
members. He wantsto forcibly dispossess my client's family.

4) As a measure of creating evidence, the said Ilango is

attempting to obtain electricity service connection as if there

is
is already
no service connection at all. Actualy, the house
above.
provided with electricity service connection as stated
provide any
5) Hence, you are called upon not to

electricity service connection. Apersonal inspection will bring

out the truth.

Àdvocate
 5-6TI0 Lbl60T uefion60T 621LO
MOHAN RANGANATHAN 2525772
02-024-001-349 .LA1A Bta: 889
i6-20241 24-06-2024-11:54:s5
VMCO24R$IS423

5440
23100 Ct Charges

5440/
Tota!

Thousand Four Hundred

AnG Fory Oniy by Cash
Five

Toiei SuÝsi£yfichuding
i Free Uniis):Rs 577S

laTenAIÉl elet. 94987 94987

 b`5D ULLT
LLÓ : 5LNj
LoTSULL :5LT
LIITºBÙ U=LIT 6T GÔUT : 257
SJHOUTu BgTOLo : 003 - SIT`560TTLO
2sflooumenjsstr Guut
LO56Ö GLOTS6ÖT
1. JråJBbIT56ÞT

2Lfloy 6T6oUT Sj6oo

60)

--JET60)600T

ls06U 6T6OT.221
I5Ts0T: 04.05.2023

6 105-1
Ju`BIUrgfl 0-5.52 6.00 Digitally signed:
127
LO60)6OT
vijayanand j
Tahsildar
12/01/2024
05:23:28:PM

0 - 5.52 6.00

5Lurj6uLLTLEui / Lo T LOU SIG 60OT SULLTLlugmsu 12/01/2024 AGÖTOI O5:23:28:PM GBJSsu LlGoT

FnsöTDarflisÜUGEps. gapsoD 51HJE560T https:/ /eservices.tn.gov.in srsöTD QmT

asugGsrG0T6IT6\o.

as55U6)E5T 09-07-2025 AÖO) 06:58:25 PM GBO`Sá) A`FIQ}EÜULLS.

J)ÚBUÊ GELOgnolsór 2D barcode uIqÜIT6ÞT PLDGULO uLg0gI 3G/GPRS 6upl Q60)600T WS6S6u
lsflungasyu
GejsuLJLGGT6TTgI..
 IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE AT
CUDDALORE
Crl.M.P.No. 2023
K Jayashrt (age-32),
W/o Mohan,
No. 1/66, Reddy Street,
Thookanampakkam Village and post.
Cuddalore Taluk.
Petitioner/Accused

/Vs /
S.H.O,
Thookanampakkam P.S,
Cr.No.65/2025. Respondent/ Complainant
AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND PETITIONER
I, Jayashr, S/o Mohan, Hindu, aged about 32 years and
residingat No. 1/66, Reddy Street, Thookanampakkam Village and post,
Cuddalore Taluk, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state on
oath as follows:
1) I am the petitioner herein and alleged accused in the above said
matter,

Anticipatory
2) I am facing the above said case. Hence I have filed the
bail application before this Honble court.
Hon'ble court and before the
3) No prior bail application filed before this
Honble High Court, Chennai.
may be pleased to accept
4) Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble court the evernt of arrest and
bail in
my affidavit and direct to release me on
render justice.
On this 09th day of July 2025
MJayohri
(Before me)
and after admitting the above
Contents are true and correct
and signed in my presence Advocate
at Cuddalore.
 IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL
DISTRICT JUDGE AT
CUDDALORE
Cr1.M.P.No. 12025
Mohan (age-42),
8/o Ranganatharn,
No. 1/66, Reddy Street,
Thookanampakkam Village and post,,
Cuddalore Taluk. --- Petitioner/Accused

/Vs /
S.H.O,
Thookanampakkam P.S,
Cr.No.65/2025. Respondent/ Complainant
AFFIDAVIT OF THE 19" PETITIONER
I, Mohan, S/oSelv Ranganathan, Hindu, aged about 42 years
and residing at No. 1/66, Reddy Street, Thookanampakkam Village and
post, Cuddalore Taluk, do hereby solemnly and sincerely affirm and state
on oath as follows:
1) I am the petitioner herein and alleged accused in the above said
matter.

2) I am facing the above said case. Hence I have filed the Anticipatory
bail application before this Hon'ble court.
3) No prior bail application filed before this Hon 'ble court and before the
Hon'ble High Court, Chennai.
4) Therefore, it is prayed that this Hon'ble court may be pleased to accept
my affidavit and direct to release me on bail in the event of arrest and
render justice.
On this 09th day of July 2025
and after admitting the above (Before me),
contents are true and correct
and signed in my presence
Advocate
at Cuddalore.
 A0394303
cOURI
A0334327
tstet TAMLNÀOU
WELE
AOVDCATES DIA
TAMÍL NADU ADVOCATES CLERKS ONE HUNDRED AND
LWELEARE FUNDsTAMP 2120 TrWENTY RUPEES 120
220 TWENTY RUPEES20 FIVE RUREES

Judicial Iorm No.72

[Sce Rule 27(6)1
IN THE COURT OF WDIÇIAL MAGISTRATENO: AT

CUDDALORE
C,MTeese No. of. ..2025
I. Mhan
2.
Tayasti Petitioner/Accused/Corhplainart

SHO: Thockanampakka 2S. Respondent/Complainant/Accused

CrNo: 652025
VAKALATENAMA
&
Twe do hercby appoint and retain MtMs./Mrs./Mls. Ka.kiHA LBA.LLR.
to appear for meus in the above case on my/our beha!f and to
plead and I/we further empower him/her/them to accept on my/our behalf, service of notice of all
proceedings in thé above case, until disposal ofthe case.

M kuhr
{Signaturc/LTI of the Alpcused/
Complainant/Sureties )
I,certify that the contents of this Vakalatn-ma were read over and explained in Tami!
(Language) in my presence to thc Execuant who appearod perfectly to understand the same and
made his/her/ their signature in my presence .
Exccuted before this A.day of . . 20.2-5
(Signature & Enrollment No.]

Nanme and address of the party(ies) with

I/We accept the Vakalathnama.
Mobile No. and email id, if any && any
(Advocate)
Identity Card No.
The address for service of the advocate
with Enrolment No., Mobile No: and cnsail id.

AINDIA
FIVE RUREES