0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views1 page

Tos Formulation Rubric

The document is a rubric for formulating a Table of Specifications (TOS) that evaluates criteria such as content accuracy, organization, alignment with learning outcomes, and presentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale, contributing to a total score out of 10 points. The rubric also includes a section for teacher comments.

Uploaded by

Liz Aira Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
32 views1 page

Tos Formulation Rubric

The document is a rubric for formulating a Table of Specifications (TOS) that evaluates criteria such as content accuracy, organization, alignment with learning outcomes, and presentation. Each criterion is scored on a scale, contributing to a total score out of 10 points. The rubric also includes a section for teacher comments.

Uploaded by

Liz Aira Cruz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Table of Specifications (TOS) Formulation Rubric

Criteria Excellent Good Needs Points


Improvement
Content All items are Mostly accurate Several /4
Accuracy & accurate; with minor inaccuracies;
Completeness covers all errors; covers major topics or
(4 pts) topics, learning most topics and objectives
objectives, and objectives; few missing;
cognitive levels elements incomplete
as intended; no missing. content.
missing
elements.
Organization & Clear, logical Generally Poorly /2
Structure (2 layout; easy to organized but organized;
pts) read; with minor confusing
rows/columns alignment or layout; missing
properly labeling issues. labels.
labeled and
aligned.
Alignment with Perfectly Mostly matches Weak or /2
Learning matches learning unclear
Outcomes (2 learning outcomes; alignment;
pts) outcomes and minor weight
assessment mismatches in distribution is
plan; weight weight inappropriate
distribution is distribution. or missing.
appropriate.
Presentation & Neat, Generally neat Messy, /2
Formatting (2 professional, with minor inconsistent
pts) and consistent inconsistencies. formatting;
formatting; free multiple typos.
from typos.

Total Score: /10

Teacher’s Comments: _______________________________________________

You might also like