Em 9087
Em 9087
for Creating
Fire-Resistant Forests
Stephen Fitzgerald and Max Bennett
EM 9087
E M 9087 • S e pte mbe r 2 01 3
W
ildfires are a natural disturbance in Pacific Northwest forests.
Historically, fire operated differently in various forest types
Silviculture is the art and science
(Figure 1, page 2) across the West. For example, fires were
frequent but less severe in ponderosa pine and dry, mixed-conifer forests.
of manipulating forests to meet
In higher, cooler-elevation forests, fires were less frequent but more
severe; many were ‘stand-replacing’ fires because most or all overstory
landowner objectives. It includes
trees were killed.
Over the last century and a half, forests have changed dramatically from treatments such as thinning,
their pre-settlement condition. This is particularly true in the drier forests
of the West, where decades of fire exclusion have resulted in a buildup of pruning, underburning, and a
fuel that has increased the size and intensity of wildfires. Climate change
may also be a factor in this trend toward “mega-fires.” wide variety of other practices.
The emphasis today in forest management, particularly on federal lands
and in wildland-urban interface areas, is on forest restoration and fuels
reduction. Land managers can affect the total amount, composition (fuel
sizes), and arrangement of fuels, and can thus influence the intensity
and severity of a wildfire. This influence is more effective or pronounced Stephen Fitzgerald, professor and
when larger areas are treated. Extension forester, central Oregon region;
and Max Bennett, Extension agent, Forest
This publication provides an overview of how various silvicultural and Natural Resources, Southern Oregon
treatments affect fuel and fire behavior, and how to create fire-resistant Research and Extension Center, Oregon
forests. In properly treated, fire-resistant forests, fire intensity is reduced State University.
2
Forest Types and Fire Regimes of the East Cascades
Gradient of Potential Vegetation Types and Fire Regimes
and overstory trees are more likely to survive than in untreated forests.
Fire-resistant forests are not “fireproof ” – under the right conditions,
any forest will burn. Much of what we present here is pertinent to the
drier forests of the Pacific Northwest, which have become extremely
He
e
yg
at
The fire triangle
Ox
depends on the three factors that comprise the fire behavior triangle:
rap
ath
the amount and arrangement of fuel, the area’s topography, and weather
og
er
p
conditions (Figure 3). A change in any one factor during a fire alters its
To
behavior and type (i.e., whether it’s a ground, surface, or crown fire).
For example, if the weather becomes hot, dry and windy, the fire will
burn with more intensity and move faster across the landscape. If a Fuel
fire is burning in heavy fuels and then moves into an area with light or
Figure 3
discontinuous fuels, fire intensity and spread decrease.
3
Other important aspects of fire:
■■ Torching. Movement of a surface fire
up into a tree crown; the precursor to
crowning
■■ Crowning. Active fire movement through
tree canopies
■■ Fire whirl. Result of an upward spinning
column of air that carries flames, smoke,
and embers aloft; whirls often form in
heavy fuels on the lee (downwind) side of
Types of fires
A wildfire may be composed of three different types of fire: ground, surface, and crown. The proportion of
each type determines the overall severity of the fire and how much vegetation the wildfire will consume or kill.
Ground fires
Ground fires consume mostly the duff layer and
produce few visible flames (Figure 4). Ground fires
also can burn out stumps and follow and burn
4
Photo by BLM
Surface fires
Surface fires produce flaming fronts that consume needles, moss,
lichen, herbaceous vegetation, shrubs, small trees, and saplings (Figure
5
Photo by Stephen Fitzgerald © OSU
Photo by BLM
Figure 8. Surface fuels and height to canopy are two factors that Figure 9. Reducing surface fuelds and increasing the height to
affect the transition from a surface fire to a canopy fire. the crown base increase the odds larger proportions of a forest
will survive a fire.
Four factors influence the transition from a surface forest fuels so that fire acts and plays out in a more
fire to crown fire (Figure 8): natural way and pattern, particularly in ponderosa pine
and drier, mixed-conifer forests.
■■ Surface fuel and foliage moisture content
■■ Surface flame length (affected by fine surface fuel There are five principles of creating and maintaining
loading, wind, and slope) fire-resistant forests:
■■ Height to the base of tree crowns (i.e., height of the
■■ Reduce surface fuels
canopy)
■■ Increase the height to the base of tree crowns
■■ Density of tree crowns (degree of overlapping of tree
■■ Increase spacing between tree crowns
crowns)
■■ Keep larger trees of more fire-resistant species
The common denominator is fuel ■■ Promote fire-resistant forests at the landscape level
We have little or no control over most factors in the By following these principles we can:
fire and fire behavior triangles. For example, we can’t
■■ Reduce the intensity of a fire, making it easier for
control the wind, topography or oxygen, or stop every
firefighters to suppress
fire ignition. However, one element we can control is
■■ Increase the odds that larger proportions of a forest will
fuel. We can alter fire behavior by reducing the amount
survive a fire (Figure 9). Small trees, shrubs, and other
and changing the arrangement of fuel before a wildfire
understory vegetation may be injured or killed, but
erupts. Recent examinations of large wildfires in the
larger trees in the stand will only be scorched, and soil
West show fire intensity and severity were usually
damage also will be reduced
significantly reduced when fuels had been reduced
■■ Reduce extent of post-fire restoration activities needed,
beforehand.
such as replanting.
6
Photo © Oregon State University
Ponderosa pine has an open crown, high moisture content in the foliage, and thick bud scales that help it survive fire.
7
Table 1. Fuels reduction options
This table shows the effect of different fuel-reduction methods when used as a stand-alone treatment.
Method Surface fuels Ladder fuels Crown fuels Contract cost ($/acre) Notes
Thinning Increase Reduce Reduce Highly variable depending on Not a stand-alone treatment;
slope and other terrain factors, requires post-operation slash
stand density, tree size, equipment abatement.
available, etc. Pre-commercial thinning to
Up to $800 per acre for smaller, reduce ladder fuels can result in
noncommercial material but can considerable surface fuel on the
yield money from larger commercial ground that must be abated.
material. Commercial thinning can utilize
most woody material for biomass or
saw logs. The value can help offset
the cost of treatment and slash
abatement.
Pruning Increase Reduce Little to no effect $50-$250 per acre depending on Usually done in conjunction with
height and number of trees pruned thinning. As a stand-alone treatment
(without removal of pruned
8
material), may substantially increase
surface fire intensity at base of tree.
Cut-and-scatter Increase Reduce No effect $25-$45 Use where fuel loads are light. May
substantially increase surface fire
intensity.
Prescribed Decrease Decrease Little to no effect $50-$250 Often an initial mechanical
underburning treatment is needed to “step down”
fuels to a point where safe burning
is feasible; liability concerns make it
risky for most private owners; smoke
management required.
Cut, pile and burn Small decrease Reduce No effect $275-$1,500. Major cost is piling.
Cut, chip-and-scatter Redistribute Decrease No effect $500-$1,500
Mowing Redistribute Little to no effect No effect $40-$150 Only fine fuels
Slashbusting/ Increase/ Decrease Little to no effect $250-$700
mastication redistribute
have intermediate flammability. Other than Oregon
white oak, most hardwoods are readily killed by fire
due to their thin bark, but they will sprout back rapidly
from stumps or root crowns with few exceptions.
Promote fire-resistant forests
at the landscape level
The larger an area treated, the more effective fuels
treatments will be at moderating fire behavior. This
includes creating gaps and openings to further reduce
the potential for crown fire. Treating in strategic
locations can help break up both continuous horizontal
and vertical layers of fuels. For example, reducing fuels
adjacent to natural features, such as meadows and rock
outcroppings, and manmade features, such as roads,
helps firefighters connect firelines to these locations.
Pruning
Prescribed Burning
Pruning can be combined with thinning or done as
Prescribed burning is the regulated use of fire to
a stand-alone treatment. Pruning removes lower tree
achieve specific forest and resource management
limbs, increasing the height of tree crown bases (Figure
objectives. It consists of two general categories: slash
11). A good height to shoot for from a fire-resistance
burning and prescribed underburning.
standpoint is 10 to 12 feet, though pruning even higher
is beneficial. The pruning slash should be disposed of Slash burning reduces surface fuels after various
through piling and burning, chipping, or, if fuel loads silvicultural treatments and is usually done by (1)
are light, cut and scatter. There are a wide variety of broadcast burning in larger units, usually clearcuts,
pruning tools, including hand-held saws, loppers, and or (2) piling and burning within stands. Prescribed
pneumatic shears, power pruners, and ladders. You may underburning is the use of fire within the forest
also be able to use your chainsaw in some situations. To understory. The primary objective of underburning is
maintain tree health, pruning should leave at least a 50 often fuels reduction, but underburning is also used
percent live crown ratio (ratio of the length of the tree to achieve other objectives, such as pre-commercial
crown to the total height of the tree) and should not thinning, nutrient release, wildlife habitat or forage
damage the tree bole. Pruning is particularly effective improvement, and control of unwanted vegetation.
in young stands where tree crowns have not yet lifted Prescribed underburning has become more common
(the gradual death and branch shedding of lower tree as the understanding of the ecological role of fire has
branches from shading) on their own. increased.
10
PRESCRIBED BURNING
Key points to consider:
■■ Prescribed burning, especially
underburning, is risky with high potential
liability.
■■ A professionally developed burn plan is a
must, and professional contract burners are
recommended.
■■ Contact your state fire control agency in
Photo by BLM
advance to discuss your plans to burn and
obtain necessary permits.
Prior to initiating any prescribed underburn, a likelihood of survival during the burn. Careful and
landowner must develop a profession burn plan. Good constant monitoring of weather on the burn day,
planning helps meet pre-determined objectives and constant contact with a local weather service, or both
minimize the chance of an escaped burn. Key elements is imperative; sudden changes in weather can rapidly
of a burn plan include: change fire behavior, increasing the risk of escape.
■■ A clear description of the stand or vegetation to be Because of its complexities and the associated liability,
enhanced by underburning and expected outcomes for prescribed underburning is rarely done on private, non-
that vegetation industrial woodlands because the cost of an escaped
■■ Data on fuel amount, distribution, and moisture burn can be considerable, as it includes not only the
content, as well as the topography and desirable weather cost of suppression, but also the cost of reimbursing
conditions on a potential burn day any neighbors whose properties may be damaged.
■■ Predictions of fire behavior (intensity and spread) based On federal lands, prescribed burning is conducted
on the above factors regularly. Federal agencies are much more willing to
■■ Ignition patterns and arrangements for holding accept potential liability as they have the know-how,
(maintaining the fire within the area) trained personnel, and the equipment to manage a
■■ Timing and seasonality of the burn prescribed burn.
■■ Smoke management guidelines
Mechanical Fuels Reduction (Mastication)
Burn plans should include a map of the unit to
Mechanical fuels treatments utilize several different
be burned, the various types of equipment and
types of equipment to chop, mow, or otherwise break
other resources needed to implement the project,
apart (masticate) ladder fuels, such as brush and small
needed permits, back-up contingency plans in the
trees, into relatively small chunks or chips, forming
event of an “escape,” medical and communications
a compact layer of woody material that is distributed
plans, public awareness and coordination with other
across the site.
agencies as needed, and post-burn plans for “mop-
up” and monitoring. Often the area to be burned Mechanical fuels reduction equipment includes
will need some type of fuel pre-treatment in order to “slashbusters,” “brush mulchers,” mowers, and other
meet objectives. This could include tree falling and devices. The “slashbuster” is a vertically mounted rotating
brushing of unwanted vegetation in order to carry a cutting head mounted on a tracked excavator. The “brush
fire, or raking or pulling slash away from trees you mulcher” consists of a horizontally mounted cutting
want to keep (called ‘leave trees’) to increase their drum attached to the front of an all-terrain vehicle (ATV)
11
sold as saw logs, posts and poles, as well as for firewood
and other materials for home use. Product sales may
help offset the treatment costs, and thinning of larger-
diameter logs may even generate a profit. When
markets are available, utilization of biomass also may
help offset costs.
12
Figure 13. Examples of
slash piles waiting to be
burned. With pile burning,
you have the option to cut,
pile, and immediately burn
(“swamper burning”), or cut,
pile, cover, and burn later in
Photo by BLM
the fall and winter months
when the forest is moist and
the pile is dry.
Pile and burn plastic is pure polyethylene). Cover just enough of the
pile to keep it dry in the center so it will burn easily.
Pile and burn is a common method for reducing
■■ Burn when conditions are wet or rainy with little or no
surface fuels generated in thinning and pruning.
wind, and during daylight hours.
(Figure 13).
■■ Avoid piling green pine slash (more than 3 inches
Another option is to leave the slash over the winter to diameter) in the late winter through mid-August due to
let some of the nutrients leach out, and then pile and the risk of attracting pine beetles.
burn later. ■■ Make sure you have a burn permit from the state
forestry office, fire warden, or other local authority that
Guidelines for pile burning:
regulates open burning.
■■ Carefully evaluate locations of piles. Place at least 10 to ■■ Some areas have a system utilizing ‘good burn days’
20 feet away from trees, stumps, brush, and logs, and 50 based on ventilation index. Make sure you are in
feet from streams. Stay well away from snags, structures, compliance.
power lines, etc. ■■ Monitor the piles to make sure they are out.
■■Construct the piles so they will burn easily. Put small
Chipping
branches, twigs, and brush less than ½-inch diameter
at the bottom of the pile to provide “kindling,” then lay Chipping is effective but is also labor intensive and
larger limbs and chunks of wood parallel to minimize air requires good access. It is probably best suited to
pockets. For hand piles, 4-by-4-foot piles are a good size; homesites and defensible space treatments.
machine piles may be much larger.
Many contractors, including arborists and tree
■■ When machine piling, use a brush blade or excavator
service companies, have large chippers that can process
to avoid getting dirt in the pile. This helps prevent
relatively large-diameter material efficiently. Self-
“holdover” fires that smolder for weeks, suddenly flaring
propelled, whole tree chippers have been developed
up when winds and temperatures increase.
and may be available for contract work in some areas.
■■ Cover piles if they are not to be burned immediately.
Be aware that large piles of chips are a fire hazard from
Cover when pile is about 80 percent complete, placing
spontaneous combustion. The chips can be scattered
the remaining material to hold the cover in place. In
across the ground or, better yet, used as mulch for
Oregon, you must remove the cover prior to burning
covering skid roads and trails.
unless it is made of pure polyethylene plastic (not all
13
Maintaining Your Investment an Important Timber Management Tool. PNW 184.
Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension
Fuels reduction is an ongoing process. The effects of
Service.
thinning and other fuels treatments last 15 years or less.
New trees and brush grow in the understory and develop Holmberg, J., and M. Bennett. 2005. Reducing
into ladder fuels. When cut, many brush and hardwood Hazardous Fuels on Woodland Properties: Pruning. EC
tree species re-sprout vigorously from root crowns and 1576. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension
rhizomes. Service.
Other species, such as manzanita and several species of Parker, B., and M. Bennett. 2005. Reducing Hazardous
ceanothus, have seeds that remain viable in the soil for Fuels on Woodland Properties: Thinning. EC 1573-
many years, even decades, and germinate readily when E. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Extension
soils are disturbed. Service.
Follow-up treatments will be needed, but they should
be less expensive than the initial treatment. Do some fuel
Additional resources
reduction on a portion of your property every year so the
Fitzgerald, S. 2002. Fire in Oregon’s Forests: Risks,
work is spread out and more manageable.
Effects, and Treatment Options. A synthesis of current
issues and scientific literature. Oregon Forest Resources
For More Information Institute, Portland, OR.
OSU Extension publications listed below can be found
Know Your Forest, Reducing Fire Hazard page. http://
at [Link]
[Link]/learning-library/reducing-
Bennett, M., and S. Fitzgerald. 2005. Reducing fire-hazard
Hazardous Fuels on Woodland Properties: Disposing of
Landowner Fire Liability. Oregon Department of
Woody Material. EC 1574. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State
Forestry. [Link]
University Extension Service.
landowner_fire_liability_reduced.pdf
Bennett, M., and S. Fitzgerald. 2005. Reducing
Oregon Department of Forestry, general fire page.
Hazardous Fuels on Woodland Properties: Mechanical
[Link]
Fuels Reduction. EC 1575. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State
University Extension Service. Oregon State University Extension Service Emergency
Resources, Wildfire in Oregon page. [Link]
Emmingham, W.H., and N.E. Elwood. 2002. Thinning:
[Link]/emergency-resources/wildfire
Sections of EM 9087 where adapted from PNW 618, Reducing Fire Risk on Your Forest Property, available in the Oregon State University Extension
Catalog at [Link]
© 2013 Oregon State University. Extension work is a cooperative program of Oregon State University, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Oregon
counties. Oregon State University Extension Service offers educational programs, activities, and materials without discrimination based on age, color, dis-
ability, gender identity or expression, genetic information, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation, or veteran’s status. Oregon
State University Extension Service is an Equal Opportunity Employer..
Published September 2013.
The Northwest Fire Science Consortium is a multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional network consisting of federal and state agencies, non-governmental organizations, universities,
and private landowners within Washington and Oregon. [Link]
14