Editorial october 2007
by Anne Wirtz
As you will see in this October-edition we present you with various
contributions of some colleagues regarding;
- old and new thinking,
- different ways of matching remedies,
- how to choose a potency according to the chakra-system.
Do not be confused by these different angles, they might inspire you and
be of help from a system unknown before.
We do not want to be dogmatic in publishing only ‘one-way‘.
Why not controversial ideas or systems?
Colleagues can take notice and choose for him/her-self what is close to
their talents. If the articles are clearly written and logically transmittable,
the basic laws of the homeopathic system like the similimum-rule not be
violated, we want to give a platform to share them with you. Take what
you need and give your opinion.
In this edition;
Pavol Tibensky gives an example of the development ‘in old and new’
approachs of solving a case in; Cactaceae versus Falco.
The article about Potencies and chakra’s will be divided in 7 parts; one
chakra per month.
Jan Scholten gives his theory on provings.
My intention was to give space to his ideas and systems in elements,
plant- families and stages, but at this same time the editor of
‘Homeopathy 4 everyone’ published an extended interview with Jan in
which he explains his ideas nicely and clearly, with some illustrative cases.
My advice is to read it there ([Link]). In former editions and more to
come you can find proof for these ideas in the cases we will share with
each other in ’Interhomeopathy’.
Enjoy the Ptelea and Armadillidum vulgare case and you realize again how
challenging every new patient will be while following his/her ‘trip’ to the
very specific-fitting-the-person-remedy.
Anne Wirtz
Amsterdam NL
park@[Link]
