Research Paper
Research Paper
Rahim et al.'s [5] comparative analysis concluded that LoRa- Smart home devices such as Google Assistant and Amazon
based gardening systems provided improved range for Alexa now support a wide range of IoT-based gardening
bigger agricultural uses, whereas Wi-Fi-based gardening systems [6]. With voice commands, users can easily be able
systems performed better for residential urban settings. to adjust irrigation levels, monitor schedules of the water,
and receive information about the plant care.
B. AI-Driven Nutrient Prediction and Water Management
D. Environmental Monitoring and Adaptive Control
Data-driven fertilizer management and predictive irrigation
models are now achievable due to recent breakthroughs in Factors such as temperature, humidity, wind speed, and
artificial intelligence and machine learning. For optimizing pollution levels have a direct effect on the growth of
fertilization schedules, AI-based gardening systems utilize plant[4]. IoT-based systems with adaptive control features
past data regarding plant growth, soil health, and weather can react to environmental changes in real time.
forecasts [2]. Smoke and Fire Hazard Detection
AI-Based Nutrient Prediction Plant growth is determined directly by temperature,
In order to identify the most optimal nutrient blend for humidity, wind speed, and the levels of pollution [1].Internet
plants, AI models read data from sensors in real-time [4]. As of Things-based systems with adaptive control functionality
an example, Pendyala et al.'s AI system [6] utilized machine are able to immediately respond to any changes in the
learning algorithms for forecasting nutrient shortages, and environment.
consequently, reduced the amount of wastage of fertilizer by Wind and Rain Adaptation Systems
28%.
Greenhouses and indoor plant spaces are gravely threatened
AI Nutrient Prediction Formula: by fire risks. The importance of smoke detectors in
N_optimal = f(S_moisture, T_temp, pH, N, P, K) Where: intelligent gardens was highlighted in a study by Kasar et al.
● N_optimal = Recommended nutrient supply [5], which helped reduce plant losses due to fire by 25%.
● S_moisture = Soil moisture content Table 1: Comparison of Traditional Manual vs. Smart
Gardening Approaches
● T_temp = Temperature
Features Traditional Smart
● pH = Soil acidity
Gardening Gardening(IoT)
● N, P, K = Essential nutrient levels (Nitrogen,
Phosphorous, Potassium) Water Manual Watering, AI-Based
Efficiency risk of irrigation,
AI-Optimized Watering Schedules
over/underwaterin optimized for
With the observation of soil moisture trends, weather, and g moisture levels
plant evapotranspiration rates, AI-powered irrigation
Nutrient Guesswork-based AI-driven, real-
systems can predict when plants require water[5]. A study
Management fertilization time
by Astutiningtyas et al. [3] found that AI-guided irrigation
optimization
reduced water wastage by 30% compared to traditional
irrigation. Weather No real-time Automated
Adaption adaption responses to rain
C. Smart Home Integration in Gardening
and wind
Enviromental No hazard Smoke, fire, and sensor, rain
Safety detection wind-speed sensor, smoke
monitoring detector (MQ-2),
water pump &
User Control Requires physical Mobile apps,
relay
presence remote control,
voice commands Network Layer ESP32/ESP8266 Transmits sensor
Summary of Literature Gaps & Research Contributions (Data microcontroller, data to cloud-
Transmission & Wi-Fi module, based platforms
While many studies have explored IoT-based gardening, AI- Cloud MQTT protocol, for remote
guided irrigation, and smart home integration, still no Processing) Firebase/AWS access
combined system has been proposed that can integrates all IoT
these functionalities in one[1].
Application Mobile/web Displays real-
This research addresses gaps by: Layer (User application, AI- time plant health
• Coming up with a real-time IoT plant monitoring Interface & AI based irrigation data, sends
system. Analytics) control, smart alerts, and
home integration enables remote
• Enacting AI-based irrigation and fertilizer
irrigation control
management practices.
• Adding smart home automation for the user's C. Software and Data Processing: The system uses AI-
convenience. driven decisions to improve irrigation, predict the need of
• Applying experimental validation to ascertain the nutrient, and adjust according to the environmental changes.
real-world effect of automated plant care.
1. AI-Driven Nutrient Prediction Model
III. METHODOLOGY
a. The AI model utilizes sensor data and
The IoT-based Smart Gardening System is designed,
weather forecasts to predict optimal
deployed, and tested in this section. The core elements of the
fertilizer requirements.
methodology are the following:
b. Formula:
A. System Design and Architecture: There are primary
layers to the system proposed for design:
1. Perception Layer: Comprising IoT sensors and
actuators, including soil moisture, temperature, c. The model adjusts nutrient dynamically
wind, smoke, and rain sensors, for real-time data based on the real-time data and
collection. information.
2. Network Layer: Wireless communication 2. IoT-Based Automated Irrigation Algorithm
through Wi-Fi (ESP8266/ESP32) or LoRa a. The irrigation system follows a
modules to transmit sensor data to cloud-based threshold-based decision model:
servers.
3. Application Layer: A mobile/web-based
application for real-time monitoring, AI-driven
irrigation control, and nutrient prediction. b. This logic prevents overwatering and
B. Hardware Components: For collecting information in adapts schedules based on real-time
real time, the system combines sensors and actuators with rainfall data.
the ESP8266/ESP32 microcontroller. D. The experimental environment involved different
Table 2: System Architecture of the Smart Gardening gardening systems and settings where the system was
System deployed and tested.
Layer Components Functionality 1. Indoor Plant Setup: Controlled environment
with potted plants.
Perception Soil moisture Collects real- 2. Outdoor Home Garden: Exposed to natural
Layer sensor, time
weather variations.
(Hardware temperature & environmental
Sensors & humidity sensor data & 3. Greenhouse Setup: Temperature and humidity-
Actuators) (DHT11/DHT22 automates regulated environment.
), wind speed irrigation
To test the variations between automated and traditional For the avoidance of over-watering and under-watering, the
plant maintenance, each setup was monitored for four weeks system was created to conserve water and eliminate wastage
and to collect data too. of water.
E. Data collection and analysis: Data collection and Figure1 presents a analysis of weekly water consumption
evaluation criteria analysis involve: over a four-week period of time.
● Water Consumption Efficiency: Reduction in
water usage (Liters/Week).
● Plant Health Index: Leaf color, growth rate, and
soil moisture stability.
● User Engagement: Mobile app usage and
feedback surveys.
Table 3: Comparison of Water Consumption (Manual vs.
System for Smart Gardening)
Metric Manual Smart Improveme
Gardenin Gardening nt (%)
g System
Observations:
● The smart system reduced water usage by an
Leaf Color 6.2 8.5 37%
average of 34.5%.
Index (0-10
Scale) ● Automated irrigation responded dynamically to
soil moisture levels.
Growth 2.1 cm 3.2 cm 52% ● Manual watering led to inconsistencies in water
Rate application.
(cm/week) B.Plant Health Improvement
To assess plant health, the study measured leaf color, growth
Soil ±20% ±5% 75% rate, and soil moisture stability.
Moisture
Fluctuation Table 4: Plant Growth & Health Comparison (Manual vs.
Smart Gardening)
Observations:
Environme Manual Smart Effectiveness
• The Automated Gardening System lowered water ntal Factor Response System
wastage by 34.5% on average. Response
• Traditional watering, however, produced different
consumption levels depending on user. Rain Manual Automated 100%
adjustment irrigation
• Based on real-time weather and soil moisture data, pause
the automated irrigation system simplified the
scheduling of irrigation easily. High Wind No Alert & 85%
IV. FINDINGS Speed protection plant cover
activation
The experimental analysis of the IoT based Smart
Gardening System is presented in this section and compared
Smoke No early Real-time 95%
with conventional manual gardening methodologies. The Detection warning fire alerts
scoring subsystems revolve around water efficiency,
beneficial development in plant health, adaptability to the Observations:
environment and overall satisfaction by the user ● AI-driven nutrient recommendations enhanced
Here you compare the outcomes of the IoT based Smart plant growth.
Gardening System with those of the traditional manual ● Soil moisture levels remained stable, preventing
gardening approaches. The key taglines are water plant stress.
efficiency, improvement in plant health, flexibility to
● Manual watering caused inconsistent growth
environmental conditions, and user satisfaction are the
patterns.
concerns of the evaluation criteria.
C.Environmental Adaptability
A. Water Efficiency Analysis
The system was tested across three environments: indoor ● The automation reduced manual effort and time
plants, outdoor gardens, and greenhouse setups. spent on plant care.
Table 5: Environmental Adaptability Test Results ● Real-time insights increased user confidence in
plant maintenance.
Advantage Traditional Smart
Gardening Gardening (IoT- V. DISCUSSION
based) This section interprets the findings from the IoT-based
Smart Gardening System, discusses its advantages over
Water Usage High wastage Optimized, traditional gardening, and highlights challenges,
34.5% reduction limitations, and future improvements.
Plant Growth Slower due to 52% A.Interpretation of Key Findings
Rate inconsistent improvement The results indicate that IoT-driven smart gardening
watering significantly enhances efficiency, plant health, and
environmental adaptability.
Nutrient Manual, risk of AI-based
Application under/over- precision Water Efficiency
fertilization
● The system reduced water consumption by
Environmental No automated Adjusts to rain, 34.5%, aligning with findings from
Response adaptation wind, and smoke Astutiningtyas et al. [3], who reported a 30%
levels reduction in water waste using automated
irrigation.
User Effort High (manual Reduced by 40% ● Soil moisture sensors effectively prevented
intervention)
overwatering, a major issue in manual gardening,
Remote Not possible Mobile app as noted by Rahim et al. [5].
Monitoring control Plant Health Improvements