There is an ongoing debate about whether children should be raised to be competitive or
cooperative. While some argue that a strong sense of competition helps children succeed,
others believe that cooperation is a more valuable skill in the long run. Both views have their
merits, and I believe a balance between the two is essential for a child’s development.
On the one hand, encouraging competition can motivate children to work harder and push
themselves to achieve their best. A competitive environment can teach children discipline,
perseverance, and goal-setting. For example, in academic or sports settings, children who aim to
outperform their peers often strive for higher standards and develop a strong work ethic. In a
world where success is often measured by individual achievement, a competitive spirit can give
children an edge.
On the other hand, cooperation is equally, if not more, important, especially in adult life. Most
workplaces today value teamwork and collaboration over individual brilliance. Learning to
cooperate teaches children how to communicate effectively, resolve conflicts, and show
empathy toward others. These are essential qualities for building healthy relationships and
functioning in society. For example, group projects in school not only improve academic
performance but also help children learn how to listen to different perspectives and contribute
fairly.
In my opinion, children should be taught to balance both competition and cooperation.
Competition can drive personal growth, while cooperation ensures they grow into considerate
and socially responsible adults. Parents and educators should create environments where
children can experience both—healthy competition in sports or academic contests, and
teamwork in group activities or community projects.
Both competition and cooperation are important life skills. Encouraging a healthy mix of both
will help children become well-rounded individuals who can succeed independently but also
work effectively with others.
