SAN BEDA UNIVERSITY

College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS

COURSE CODE:
COURSE TITLE: ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
COURSE CREDIT: 2 UNITS
COURSE PREREQUISITE/S:
FACULTY: _
EMAIL ADDRESS:
TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: SECOND SEMESTER SCHOOL YEAR 2024-2025
DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION:
COURSE DELIVERY MODE: FACE TO FACE
CONSULTATION DAY/TIME:

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

A detailed study of the various Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) mechanisms,

other allied laws, rules, and international laws, rules, and conventions.

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)

(a) To know and understand the different ADR mechanisms existing under
Philippine Law and the different international convention applicable to ADR; (b)
To know the applicable rules to a specific ADR mechanism; (c) To know the core
principles of ADR.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize

Upon completion of the Course Title course, the student is expected to be able to:

Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Understand the interplay of the various forms of ADR and other
thinking allied laws and international conventions
Effective in written and LO2. Understand the core principles governing ADR and allied laws
oral communication LO3. Be able to apply recognize the different mechanisms of dispute
Logical reasoning resolution and their differences
Sound judgment LO4. Be exposed to the various forms of ADR
Exercise of proper
professional and ethical
responsibilities

1
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:

The student will be graded according to the following:

Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - Research Paper, Case Study

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100

LEARNING PLAN:

Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

learning resources to be used; weekly schedule of the topics to be taken up; and the
learning methods to be utilized that are most likely to lead students towards the
goals and learning outcomes that were defined.

TEXTBOOK/REFERENCE BOOK:

1. Alternative Dispute Resolution: Fourt Edition (2024) by Justice Gabriel T. Robeniol

2. Philippine Alternative Dispute Resolution (2024 Edition) by Irene De Torres-Alogoc

APPLICABLE LAW:

1. Civil Code (Articles 2028-2046)

2. The Arbitration Law (R.A. No. 876, as amended)
3. Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 (R.A. No. 9285)
4. Construction Industry Arbitration Law (E.O. No. 1008)
5. Special Rules of Court on Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.M. No. 07-11-08-SC)
6. Department of Justice Department Circular No. 98 (Implementing Rules and Regulations
of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 2004 December 4, 2009)
7. UNCITRAL Model Law of 1985
8. New York Convention (Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards June. 10, 1958; Concurred by the Philippine Senate under Senate
Resolution No. 71, May 10, 1965; Philippine Instrument of Ratification, signed by the
President of the Philippines on October 11, 1965)
9. A.M. No. 19-10-20-SC
10. The ICSID Convention

2
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

Course Introduction
 Course overview Syllabus Week 1 Lecture
 Course assignments Discussion
 Course requirements

Module 1:

I. Applicable Provisions of • Syllabus Week 2  Recitation

the Civil Code (Articles • Textbook  Case study
2028-2046 of the Civil • Supreme Court  Discussion
Code) Decisions (SCRA)  Quiz

II. General Provisions and

Core Principles of
Alternative Dispute
Resolution

III. Republic Act No. 9285

IV. A.M. 07-11-08-SC

V. Cases:

1. Heirs of Salas v. Laperal

Realty, G.R. No. 135362,
December 13, 1999

2. BF Corp v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
120105, March 27, 1998

3. Home Bankers Savings v.

Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 115412, November
19, 1999

4. LM Power Engineering
Corp. v. Capitol Industrial
Construction, G.R. No.
141833, March 26, 2003

5. Sea-Land v. CA, G.R. No.

126212, March 2, 2000

6. Magellan Capital v.
Rolando Zosa, G.R. No.
129916, March 26, 2001

3
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

7. Del Monte Corporation-

USA v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 136154,
February 7, 2001

8. Cargill v. San Fernando

Regala, G.R. No. 175404,
January 31, 2011

9. RCBC v. BDO, G.R. No.

196171, December 10,
2012

10. Tuna Processing v.

Philippine Kingford, G.R.
No. 185582, February 29,
2012

11. ABS-CBN v. WINS, G.R.

No. 169332, February 11,
2008

12. Fruehauf v. Technology,

G.R. No. 204197,
November 23, 2016

13. Department of Foreign

Affairs v. BCA, G.R. No.
225051, July 19, 2017

14. Chu v. Hon. Mario B.

Capellan, A.M. No. MTJ-
11-1779, July 16, 2012

15. Sandoval Shipyards v.

Phil. Merchant Marine
Academy, G.R. No.
188633, April 10, 2013

Module 2:

I. Arbitration in General • Syllabus Week 3  Recitation

• Textbooks  Case study
II. General Provisions of the • Supreme Court  Discussion
UNCITRAL Model Law Decisions (SCRA)  Quiz
(UNCITRAL Model Law
of 1985)

4
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

III. The Alternative Dispute

Resolution Act (Secs. 19-
31 of Republic Act No.
9285)

IV. Cases:

1. Mabuhay Holding Corp.

v. Sembcorp Logistics,
G.R. No. 212734,
December 5, 2018

2. DFA v. BCA, G.R. No.

210858, June 29, 2016

3. DPWH v CMC, G.R. No.

179732, September 13,
2017

4. Luzon v. Bridestone,
G.R. No. 220546,
December 7, 2016

5. Fruehauf v. Technology,
G.R. No. 204197,
November 23, 2017

6. BCDA v. DMCI, G.R

No. 173137, January 11,
2016

7. J Pulse v. Utility
Assurance, G.R. No.
199650, June 26, 2013

8. Tuna Processing v.
Philippine Kingford,
G.R. No. 185582,
February 11, 2008

9. Benguet v. DENR, G.R.

No. 163101, February 13,
2008

10. Korea Technologies v.

Lerma, G.R. No. 143581,
January 7, 2008

5
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
11. NPC v. Legasto, G.R.
No. 148318, November
22, 2004

12. NSC v. Lanao, G.R. No.

127004, March 11, 1999

13. Bengson v. Chan, G.R.

No. 27283, July 29, 1977

14. Ang v. De Venecia, G.R.

No. 217151, February 12,
2020

15. Equitable PCI Banking

Corporation v. RCBC,
G.R. No. 182248,
December 18, 2008

16. RCBC Capital Corp. v.

Banco de Oro Unibank,
Inc., G.R. No. 196171,
December 10, 2012

Module 3:

I. International • Syllabus Weeks 4-5  Recitation

Commercial Arbitration • Textbooks  Case study
• Supreme Court  Discussion
II. Core Principles of Decisions (SCRA)  Quiz
International
Commercial Arbitration

III. Procedure in
International
Commercial Arbitration

IV. The Arbitration

Agreement

V. Constitution and
Composition of Arbitral
Tribunal

VI. Jurisdiction of the

Arbitral Tribunal

6
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
VII. Conduct of Arbitral
Proceedings

VIII. Cases:

1. Strickland v. Ernst &

Young, G.R. 193782,
August 1, 2018

2. DENR v. United Planners

Consultants, G.R. No.
212081, February 23,
2015

3. National Union Fire

Insurance Company of
Pittsburg v. Stolt-Nielsen
Philippines, G.R. No.
87958, April 26, 1990

4. Puromines, Inc v. Court

of Appeals, G.R. No.
91228, March 22, 1993

5. General Insurance v.
Union Insurance Society,
G.R. No. 30475,
November 22, 1989

6. Del Monte Corporation-

USA v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 136154,
February 7, 2001

7. Oil and Natural Gas

Commission v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
114323, July 23, 1998

8. Gonzales v. Climax
Mining, G.R. No.
161957, January 22, 2007

9. Koppel v. Makati Rotary

Club, G.R. No. 198075,
September 4, 2013

10. Cargill Philippines v. San

Fernando Regal Trading,

7
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
G.R. No. 175404, January
31, 2011

11. Dupasquier v. Ascendas

Philippines, G.R. No.
211044, July 24, 2019

12. Department of Foreign

Affairs v. Falcon, G.R.
No. 176657, September 1,
2010

13. Busan Universal Rail v.

DOTC, G.R. No. 235878,
February 26, 2020

14. Federal Express v.

Airfreight 2100, Inc.,
G.R. No. 216600,
November 21, 2016

15. BF Corp v. Court of

Appeals, G.R. No.
120105, March 27, 1998

16. Steamship v. Sulpicio

Lines, G.R. No. 196072,
September 20, 2017

17. PEZA v. Bataan, G.R.

No. 179537, October 23,
2009

18. Aboitiz v. Gothong, G.R.

No. 198226, July 18,
2014

19. Home Bankers Savings v.

Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 115412, November
19, 1999

20. Transfield v. Luzon

Hydro – G.R. No.
146717, November 22,
2004 and May 19, 2006

21. Philippine International

Air Terminals Co., Inc. v.

8
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
Republic of the
Philippines, ICC Case
No. 12610/TE/MW/AVH

Module 4:

I. Domestic Arbitration • Syllabus Weeks 6-7  Recitation

• Textbooks  Case study &
• Republic Act No. 876 • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA)  Discussion
II. Core Principles of  Quiz
Domestic Arbitration

III. Procedure in Domestic

Arbitration

IV. Recourse Against the

Arbitral Award

V. Cases:

1. Umbao v. Yap, G.R. No.

8933, February 28, 1957

2. ABS-CBN v. WINS,
G.R. No. 169332,
February 11, 2008

3. Romago, Inc. v. Siemens

Building Technologies,
Inc., G.R. No. 181969,
October 2, 2009

4. BF Corporation v. Court
of Appeals, G.R. No.
120105, March 27, 1998

5. National Union Fire

Insurance Company of
Pittsburg v. Stolt-Nielsen
Philippines, G.R. No.
87958, April 26, 1990

6. Puromines, Inc v. Court

of Appeals, G.R. No.
91228, March 22, 1993

7. Aboitiz Equity Ventures

9
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
v. Chiongbian, G.R. No.
197530, July 9, 2014

8. Hygienic Packaging
Corporation v. Nutri-
Asia, G.R. No. 201302,
January 23, 2019

9. Lanuza v. BF
Corporation, G.R. No.
174938, October 1, 2014

10. La Naval Drug

Corporation v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
103200, August 31, 1994

11. Associated Bank v. Court

of Appeals, G.R. No.
107918, June 14, 1994

12. Chung Fu Industries, Inc.

v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 96283, February 25,
1992

13. General Insurance &

Surety Corporation v.
Union Insurance Society
of Canton, G.R. No.
30475, November 22,
1989

14. Magellan Capital

Management
Corporation v. Zosa,
G.R. No. 129916, March
26, 2001

15. Eastboard Navigation v.

Ysmael, G.R. No. 9090,
September 10, 1957

16. Heirs of Salas v. Laperal

Realty Corporation, G.R.
No. 135362, December
13, 1999

17. Del Monte Corporation-

10
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
USA v. Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 136154,
February 7, 2001

18. Agan v. PIATCO, G.R.

No. 155001, May 5, 2003

19. Coquia v. Fieldmen’s

Insurance Co., G.R. No.
23276, November 29,
1968

20. LM Power Engineering

Corporation v. Capitol
Construction Groups,
G.R. No. 141833, March
26, 2003

21. Asset Privatization Trust

v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 121171, December
29, 1998

Mid-Term Examinations Week 8

Module 5:
• Syllabus Weeks 9-10  Recitation
I. Making of Award and • Textbooks  Case study
Termination of • Supreme Court  Discussion
Proceedings Decisions (SCRA)  Quiz

II. Recourse Against the

Arbitral Award

III. Recognition,
Confirmation, and
Enforcement of Award

• Republic Act No. 9285

• 1958 New York
Convention on the
Recognition and
Enforcement of Foreign
Arbitral Awards
• Rule 39, Section 48 of
the Rules of Court

11
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

IV. Cases:

1. Grogun v. National
Power Corporation, G.R.
No. 156259, September
18, 2003

2. Equitable v. RCBC, G.R.

No. 182248, December
18, 2008

3. Transfield Philippines,
Inc. v. Luzon Hydro
Corporation, G.R. No.
146717, May 19, 2006

4. Chung Fu v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No. 96283,
February 25,1992

5. Asset Privatization Trust

v. Court of Appeals, G.R.
No. 121171, December
29, 1998

6. National Power
Corporation v. Legasto,
G.R. No. 148318,
November 22, 2004

7. Fruehauf Electronics v.
Technology Electronics,
G.R. No. 204719,
November 23, 2016

8. Adamson v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
206879, May 27, 1994

9. ABS-CBN v. WINS, G.R.

No. 169332, February 11,
2008

10. Santiago v. Gonzales,

G.R. No. 36627, October
20, 1997

11. National Steel Corp. v.

12
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
RTC of Lanao del Norte,
G.R. No. 127004, March
11, 1999

12. RCBC v. BDO, G.R. No.

196171, December 10,
2012

13. Sousaris v. Miller, G.R.

No. 21167, December 30,
1998

14. LM Power Engineering v.

Capitol Industrial
Construction, G.R. No.
141833, March 26, 2003

15. De Lopez v. Vda. De

Fajardo, G.R. No. 9324,
August 30, 1957

16. Imperial Textile Mills v.

Sampang, G.R. No.
94960, March 8, 1993

17. Insular Savings Bank v.

FEBTC, G.R. No.
141818, June 22, 2006

18. PCSO v. DFNNI, G.R.

No. 234193, June 30,
2021

19. Eastboard Navigation v.

Ysmael, G.R No. 9090,
September 10, 1957

20. Nagarmull v. Binalbagan-

Isabela Sugar, G.R. No.
22470, May 28, 1970

21. Oil and Natural Gas

Commission v. Court of
Appeals, G.R. No.
114323, July 23, 1998

22. Mabuhay Holdings Corp.

v. Sembcorp Logistics,
G.R. No. 212734,

13
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
December 5, 2018

23. BCDA v. CJH

Development Corp., G.R.
No. 219421, April 3, 2024

Module 6:

I. Mediation • Syllabus Week 11  Recitation

• Textbooks  Case study
II. Sections 399 – 422, Book • Supreme Court  Discussion
III, Title I, Chapter 7 of Decisions (SCRA)  Quiz
Republic Act No. 7160

III. Katarungang
Pambarangay Circular
No. 1 dated June 1, 1992

IV. OCA Circular No. 69-

2022: Rules on Expedited
Procedures in the First
Level Courts (focus only
on the Rules on Small
Claims under Rule IV)

V. A.M. No. 08-8-7-SC,

December 8, 2015

VI. Court-Annexed Mediation

VII. Judicial Dispute

Resolution

VIII. Presidential Decree No.

242 in relation to Book
IV, Chapter 14 of the
Administrative Code

IX. Cases:

1. GMCC United
Development v. Gotesco
Regency, G.R. No.
206137, April 8, 2015

2. A.L. Ang Network, Inc.

v. Mondejar, G.R. No.
200804, January 22, 2014

14
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

3. PSALM v. CIR, G.R.

No. 198146, August
8,2017

4. PVID v. Velez, G.R. No.

84295, July 18, 1991

5. Cruz v. Republic, G.R.

No. 216825, October 14,
2019

6. PAMACO v. Singson,
UDK-16069, February
19, 2018

7. Ocmer v. Universal Glass

Co., Inc., G.R. No.
243058, March 4, 2019

8. Carpio v. Dimaguila,
A.M. No. MTJ-17-1897,
November 21, 2018

9. Calica Vda. De lee v.

Calica-Eclipse, G.R. No.
220533, January 30,
2017

10. Ateneo De Manila

University v. Diestro,
G.R. No. 197439, March
20, 2019

11. Borromeo v. Mangente,

A.M. No. MTJ-13-1832,
November 12, 2014

12. Panares v. Sumifru

Philippines, G.R. No.
244662, October 9, 2019

13. Elgar v. Santos, Jr., A.M.

No. MTJ-16-1880,
February 4, 2020

14. Re: Dinah Evangeline b.

Bandong, A.M. No. RTJ-
17-2507, October 9, 2017

15
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)

15. BBB v. AAA, G.R. No.

193225, February 9,
2015

16. Ang v. De Venecia, G.R.

No. 217151

17. Gaw Chin Ty v. Gaw

Chua, G.R. No. 212598,
September 29, 2021

18. Tuazon, World Wiser

International, Inc. v.
Fuentes, G.R. No.
241699, August 4, 2021

Module 7:

I. Construction Industry • Syllabus Week 12  Recitation

Arbitration Commission • Textbooks  Case study &
(CIAC) • Supreme Court reporting
Decisions (SCRA)  Discussion
II. Revised Rules of  Quiz
Procedure Governing
Construction Arbitration
(CIAC Rules)

III. Cases:

1. Metro Construction Inc.

v. Chatham Properties,
G.R. No. 141897,
September 24, 2001

2. Philrock v. CIAC, G.R.

No.132848,June 26, 2001

3. Golangco v. Ray Burton

Corp., G.R. No. 163582,
July 20, 1995

4. DFA v. Falcon, G.R. No.

176657, September 1,
2010

5. Uy v. Public Estates
Authority, G.R. No.

16
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
147925, June 8, 2009

6. Shinryo v. RRN
Incorporated, G.R. No.
172525, October 20, 2010

7. Transcept v. Aguilar,
G.R. No. 177556,
December 8, 2010

8. Limcomcen v.
Foundation Specialists,
G.R. No. 167022, August
31, 2007

9. Manila Insurance v. Sps.

Amurao, G.R. No.
179628, January 16, 2013

10. JP Plus Asia v. Utility

Assurance, G.R. No.
199650, June 26, 2013

11. CE Construction v.
Araneta Center, G.R. No.
192725, August 8, 2017

12. Excellent v. Multi Rich,

G.R. No. 175048,
February 10, 2009

13. LM v. Capitol, G.R. No.

141833, March 26, 2003

14. TIEZA v. Global, G.R.

No. 219708, October 3,
2018

15. Federal v. Power Factor,

G.R. No. 211504, March
8, 2017

16. Fyfe v. PAL, G.R. No.

160071, June 6, 2016

17. Stronghold v. Stroem,

G.R No. 204689, January
21, 2015

17
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
18. MRTC v. Gammon
Philippines, G.R. No.
200401, January 17, 2018

19. Global Medical Center of

Laguna, Inc. v. Global
Medical Center of
Laguna, G.R. No.
230112, May 11, 2021

20. Ang v. De Venecia, G.R.

No. 217151, February 12,
2020

21. China Chang Jiang

Energy Corp. v. Rosal
Infrastructure Builders,
G.R. No. 125706,
September 30, 1996

22. HUTAMA-RSEA Joint

Operations, Inc. v. Citra
Metro Manila Tollways
Corporation, G.R. No.
180640, April 24, 2009

Module 8:

I. Investor-State Arbitration • Syllabus Week 13  Recitation

• Articles  Case study &
II. Principles of Investment reporting
Treaty Arbitration  Discussion
 Quiz
III. Types of Claims in
Investment Arbitration

IV. Arbitration under the

ICSID Convention

V. Cases:

1. Fraport AG Frankfurt
Airport Services
Worldwide v. The
Republic of the
Philippines, ICSID Case
No. ARB/03/25

18
 LEARNING
LEARNING WEEK/
METHODS
RESOURCES DATE
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed or
(print and non-print (Schedule of
(arrangement or sequence of deployed by the
materials and each Topic,
the major topics is based on a teacher to bring
online/ Assign, Exam
logical order) about, or create the
open-access for the entire
conditions for
resources) semester)
learning)
2. Prime Energy Resources
Development B.V.
(formerly Shell
Philippines Exploration
B.V.) v. Republic of the
Philippines, ICSID Case
No. ARB/16/22

Pre-Final Examination Activity Week 14 Mock Arbitration/

Other similar activity

Final Examinations Week 15

POLICIES:

Policies and values that the teacher might want to communicate through the
syllabus concerning attendance, participation, academic integrity (e.g. plagiarism,
cheating, fabrication), missing assignments, missed exams, recording classroom
activities, online behavior during synchronous sessions, etc.

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
3. Students are prohibited from recording as this is a violation of the Copyright of the
Professor.

Prepared by:

-
Faculty, College of Law

Approved by:

Atty. Marciano G. Delson

Dean, College of Law

19