Fpubh 11 1145016
Fpubh 11 1145016
Assessment of medication
OPEN ACCESS adherence among Lebanese adult
patients with non-communicable
EDITED BY
Joseph O. Fadare,
Ekiti State University, Nigeria
REVIEWED BY
Gerard Kennedy,
diseases during COVID-19
Federation University Australia, Australia
Ib Christian Bygbjerg,
University of Copenhagen, Denmark
lockdown: a cross-sectional study
*CORRESPONDENCE
Diana Malaeb Diana Malaeb 1,2*, Hala Sacre 3, Sara Mansour 2, Chadia Haddad 3,4,
[email protected] Abir Sarray El Dine 2, Tamara Fleihan 5, Souheil Hallit 6,7,8,
RECEIVED 15January 2023
ACCEPTED 25 May 2023
Pascale Salameh 3,9,10,11 and Hassan Hosseini 12,13
PUBLISHED 21 June 2023 1
College of Pharmacy, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates, 2 School of Pharmacy,
CITATION Lebanese International University, Beirut, Lebanon, 3 INSPECT-LB (Institut National de Santé Publique,
Malaeb D, Sacre H, Mansour S, Haddad C, d’Épidémiologie Clinique et de Toxicologie-Liban), Beirut, Lebanon, 4 School of Health Sciences,
Sarray El Dine A, Fleihan T, Hallit S, Modern University for Business and Science, Beirut, Lebanon, 5 Gilbert and Rose-Marie Chagoury School
Salameh P and Hosseini H (2023) Assessment of Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon, 6 School of Medicine and Medical
of medication adherence among Lebanese Sciences, Holy Spirit University of Kaslik, Jounieh, Lebanon, 7 Applied Science Research Center, Applied
adult patients with non-communicable Science Private University, Amman, Jordan, 8 Department of Research, Psychiatric Hospital of the Cross,
diseases during COVID-19 lockdown: a cross- Jal Eddib, Lebanon, 9 Faculty of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon, 10 Department of
sectional study. Primary Care and Population Health, University of Nicosia Medical School, Nicosia, Cyprus, 11 School of
Front. Public Health 11:1145016. Medicine, Lebanese American University, Byblos, Lebanon, 12 INSERM U955-E01, IMRB, Henri Mondor
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1145016 Hospital, Créteil, France, 13 Department of Neurology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, Créteil, France
COPYRIGHT
© 2023 Malaeb, Sacre, Mansour, Haddad,
Sarray El Dine, Fleihan, Hallit, Salameh and
Hosseini. This is an open-access article Background: Medical treatment is considered a cornerstone in non-communicable
distributed under the terms of the Creative diseases (NCDs) management, lack of adherence remains the main challenge that
Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The
use, distribution or reproduction in other may compromise optimal therapeutic outcome achievement.
forums is permitted, provided the original Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate treatment adherence levels and associated
author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are
credited and that the original publication in this factors among Lebanese adult patients with non-communicable diseases.
journal is cited, in accordance with accepted Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey conducted during the COVID-19
academic practice. No use, distribution or
reproduction is permitted which does not lockdown imposed by the Lebanese Government (between September 2020
comply with these terms. and January 2021) enrolled 263 adult patients through an anonymous online
questionnaire to assess adherence to medications using the Lebanese Medication
Adherence Scale (LMAS-14).
Results: Of the total sample, 50.2% showed low adherence with a total mean
adherence score of 4.41±3.94. The results showed that depression (β =1.351)
and peptic ulcer (β =1.279) were significantly associated with higher LMAS scores
(lower adherence). However, age between 50 and 70 (β =−1.591, p =0.011),
practicing physical exercise (β =−1.397, p =0.006), having kidney disease
(β =−1.701, p =0.032), and an intermediate (β =−1.336, p =0.006) to high income
(β =−3.207, p <0.001) were significantly associated with lower LMAS scores
(higher adherence).
Conclusion: Our study shed light on the factors affecting medication adherence in
patients with non-communicable diseases. It showed that depression and peptic
ulcer were associated with lower adherence, contrary to older age, exercising,
having chronic kidney disease, and a higher socioeconomic status.
KEYWORDS
Age
The study was conducted based on the declaration of Helsinki and
18–29 121 46%
was approved by the ethics committee at the School of pharmacy of
30–49 93 35.4%
the Lebanese International University (202ORC-035-LIUSOP).
Written informed consent was obtained from participants before 50–70 45 17.1%
inclusion in the study. Above 70 years 4 1.5%
Living area
Beirut 125 47.5%
2.5. Statistical analysis
Bekaa 8 3%
Data collected were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Mount Lebanon 63 24%
Sciences (SPSS) version 25.0. Continuous variables were presented as North 22 8.4%
mean and standard deviation and 95% confidence interval. Categorical
South 45 17.1%
and ordinal variables were shown as frequencies (n) and percentages
(%). The LMAS score, taken as a continuous variable, was considered as Marital status
the outcome variable, whereas sociodemographic variables and past Single 132 50.2%
medical diseases were considered as explanatory variables. Married 131 49.8%
Non-parametric tests were used as LMAS-14 was not normally
Education level
distributed. The Mann–Whitney test and the Kruskal-Wallis test were
used to compare the means of two groups and three groups or more, Scholar level 25 9.5%
respectively. Stepwise linear regression was conducted, taking the LMAS University level 238 90.5%
total score as the dependent variable. Independent variables that showed
Employment status
a p < 0.2 in the bivariate analysis were entered in the final model to
Unemployed 107 40.7%
minimize confounding. A p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Employed 156 59.3%
Income level
3. Results Low 102 38.8%
Mean SD
The results of the bivariate analysis are summarized in Table 3. A 3.4. Multivariable analysis
higher mean LMAS-14 score was found in females vs. males (4.89 vs.
3.20, p = 0.001), married vs. single participants (4.95 vs. 3.87, A first linear regression taking the LMAS-14 scale as the
p = 0.027), those who do not practice physical exercise vs. those who dependent variable and the sociodemographic characteristics as the
TABLE 2 Description of history of medical disease. TABLE 3 Bivariate analysis of the LMAS scale as the dependent variable.
LMAS-14 scores (higher adherence) (Table 4, model 1). Intermediate 4.07 ± 3.68 <0.001
A second linear regression taking the LMAS-14 scale as the High 2.17 ± 2.40
dependent variable and the history of medical diseases as the
Exercise status
independent variable showed that being married (β = 1.193, p = 0.012),
having a depression (β = 1.351), and peptic ulcer (β = 1.279) were Yes 3.58 ± 3.77
0.026
significantly associated with higher LMAS-14 scores (lower No 4.76 ± 3.96
adherence). However, being 50–70 years old (β = −1.591, p = 0.011), Hypertension
practicing physical exercise (β = −1.397, p = 0.006), having kidney
Yes 3.80 ± 4.31
disease (β = −1.701, p = 0.032), and having an intermediate 0.152
(β = −1.336, p = 0.006) to high income (β = −3.207, p < 0.001) were No 4.61 ± 3.79
4. Discussion Cholesterol
Yes 4.24 ± 4.15
0.613
To our knowledge, no previous studies have explored medication No 4.50 ± 3.82
adherence among Lebanese patients with NCDs, a considerable
Arrhythmias
challenge in achieving therapeutic outcomes. Although poor
adherence is one of the principal causes of non-responsiveness to Yes 5.11 ± 3.98
0.05
medications, factors known to influence it have not been thoroughly No 4.08 ± 3.88
investigated yet. Hence, this study assessed the medication adherence Kidney disease
and associated factors in a sample of Lebanese adult patients with
Yes 3.30 ± 4.01
NCDs. It revealed that almost half of the patients were not adherent 0.160
to their medications, highlighting that married participants, those No 4.51 ± 3.92
depressed, and diagnosed with peptic ulcer had significantly lower Peptic ulcer
adherence. However, participants 50–70 years old, practicing physical Yes 5.54 ± 3.97
exercise, having a history of kidney disease, and an intermediate to 0.002
No 3.90 ± 3.82
high income had significantly higher adherence.
Depression
Yes 5.69 ± 4.60
0.003
4.1. The extent of medication adherence No 3.90 ± 3.53
Obesity
Our results showed that almost half of the patients were
Yes 4.10 ± 4.01
adherent to medications, similar to other findings among Lebanese 0.375
diabetic patients (15). The low adherence rate in our study can No 4.56 ± 3.89
be explained by the lack of structured healthcare systems, Bold values represent significant results.
Model 1: Linear regression taking the LMAS scale as the dependent variable and the sociodemographic as
independent variables
Marital status (married vs. single*) 1.234 0.158 0.011 0.282 2.185
Model 2: Linear regression taking the LMAS scale as the dependent variable and the history of medical disease as
independent variables
Peptic ulcer (yes vs. no*) 1.279 0.151 0.011 0.292 2.266
Kidney disease (yes vs. no*) −1.701 −0.126 0.032 −3.257 −0.145
Exercise status (yes vs. no*) −1.397 −0.163 0.006 −2.384 −0.410
Marital status (married vs. single*) 1.193 0.153 0.012 0.268 2.118
inappropriate medical coverages, and the low socioeconomic for our results could be low marital satisfaction, unhappy marriage,
status, forcing patients to be reluctant to adhere to their treatment. along with illness, depression, heavy drinking, and more isolation
This low adherence rate can also be due to the stressful events the (18, 19).
Lebanese population is witnessing, whether related to the economic
crisis or the COVID-19 pandemic, as described in previous
literature, showing that stress decreased medication adherence 4.3. Diseases and medication adherence
(12). Furthermore, this study was conducted during the COVID-19
imposed lockdown, where chronic patients were confined at home Our results highlighted that patients with depression had poor
and had limited access to healthcare services, thus decreasing medication adherence, consistent with the data from previous
adherence to medications. Another interpretation could be that literature showing that psychiatric conditions were frequently
this study was conducted among Lebanese patients with different associated with low adherence rates (20).
and multiple NCDs, thus having lower medication adherence than The reasons for the association between depressive symptoms and
those with a single disease (16). non-adherence to treatment might be the greater feelings of
hopelessness, social isolation, withdrawal from social networks, and a
possible decline in cognitive functioning that may affect memory, and
4.2. Marital status and medication reduce the energy to continue the medical treatment (21). In our
adherence study, patients with peptic ulcer disease had poor medication
adherence, in agreement with data from previous studies (22). A
Our study highlighted that married individuals had lower possible explanation could be the metallic taste of medications used
medication adherence contrary to previous findings (17). Our findings to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection, as reported in previous
can be explained by the fact that sometimes marriage can create research (23). Another reason could be the frequency of drug
conflicts and tension, differences in health beliefs or attitudes can lead administration, the number of pills administered, and the complexity
to disagreements, and burden imposed on one partner to manage of eradication regimens, explaining the inverse relationship between
disease for a spouse with complex health needs can lead to caregiver the number of doses and adherence (24).
burden and stress which all can impact medication adherence. Our results revealed that patients with kidney disease had good
Although marital satisfaction was not explored, a possible explanation medication adherence, consistent with previous findings (25, 26). A
possible interpretation could be the availability of memory aids, the social media, a selection bias might still exist as the majority
assisting devices, and support and care from family members of the study participants were of young age and educated which
facilitating medication adherence (25, 26). further hinders the generalizability of the results. Our study also
did not consider other cultural factors that affect adherence to
medication due to the nature of the study since it was conducted
4.4. Socioeconomic status and medication during COVID-19 lockdown and it was not conducted through
adherence face to face communication that impede the appropriate
assessment. The cultural factors include beliefs and traditions that
In our study, higher medication adherence was significantly can shape individuals’ perceptions of health and illness, language
associated with intermediate-high socioeconomic class, in barriers and health literacy that can impede effective
agreement with previous findings in other studies (27). These communication between healthcare providers and patients,
patients have greater provider/caregiver availability and regular religious and spiritual beliefs that play vital role in healthcare
medical follow-ups, enhancing medication adherence (28, 29). decision-making, and family and social support. An
They also have adequate medical/prescription coverage and thus overrepresentation of the Lebanese residing in Beirut and Mount
are more adherent (30). Lebanon was also noted. Thus, more studies are mandated to
assess adherence to medications among non communicable
diseases outside the lock downs since our study is not a
4.5. Age and medication adherence representative of adherence among all Lebanese population.
References
1. Donkor ES. Stroke in the 21(st) century: a snapshot of the burden, epidemiology, 17. Wu JR, Lennie TA, Chung ML, Frazier SK, Dekker RL, Biddle MJ, et al. Medication
and quality of life. Stroke Res Treat. (2018) 2018:3238165. doi: 10.1155/2018/3238165 adherence mediates the relationship between marital status and cardiac event-free
survival in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung. (2012) 41:107–14. doi: 10.1016/j.
2. Lahoud N, Salameh P, Saleh N, Hosseini H. Prevalence of Lebanese stroke
hrtlng.2011.09.009
survivors: a comparative pilot study. J Epidemiol Glob Health. (2016) 6:169–76. doi:
10.1016/j.jegh.2015.10.001 18. Johnson MO, Dilworth SE, Taylor JM, Darbes LA, Comfort ML, Neilands TB.
Primary relationships, HIV treatment adherence, and virologic control. AIDS Behav.
3. Jauch EC, Saver JL, Adams HP Jr, Bruno A, Connors JJ(B), Demaerschalk BM,
(2012) 16:1511–21. doi: 10.1007/s10461-011-0021-0
et al. Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a
guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/ 19. DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-
American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2013) 44:870–947. doi: 10.1161/ analysis. Health Psychol. (2004) 23:207–18. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207
STR.0b013e318284056a
20. Grenard JL, Munjas BA, Adams JL, Suttorp M, Maglione M, McGlynn EA, et al.
4. Sokol SI, Kapoor JR, Foody JM. Blood pressure reduction in the primary and Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the
secondary prevention of stroke. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. (2006) 4:155–60. doi: United States: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. (2011) 26:1175–82. doi: 10.1007/
10.2174/157016106776359862 s11606-011-1704-y
5. Matar D, Frangieh AH, Abouassi S, Bteich F, Saleh A, Salame E, et al. Prevalence, 21. Wu JR, Lennie TA, Dekker RL, Biddle MJ, Moser DK. Medication adherence,
awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in Lebanon. J Clin Hypertens. (2015) depressive symptoms, and cardiac event-free survival in patients with heart failure. J
17:381–8. doi: 10.1111/jch.12485 Card Fail. (2013) 19:317–24. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.03.010
6. Sacco RL, Benjamin EJ, Broderick JP, Dyken M, Easton JD, Feinberg WM, et al. 22. Abbasinazari M, Sahraee Z, Mirahmadi M. The Patients' adherence and adverse
American Heart Association prevention conference. IV. Prevention and rehabilitation drug reactions (ADRs) which are caused by Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. J
of stroke. Risk factors. Stroke. (1997) 28:1507–17. Clin Diagn Res. (2013) 7:462–6. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/4673.2799
7. Al-Qasem A, Smith F, Clifford S. Adherence to medication among chronic patients 23. Martins AP, Ferreira AP, da Costa FA, Cabrita J. How to measure (or not)
in middle eastern countries: review of studies. East Mediterr Health J. (2011) 17:356–63. compliance to eradication therapy. Pharm Pract. (2006) 4:88–94. doi: 10.4321/
doi: 10.26719/2011.17.4.356 S1885-642X2006000200007
8. Yassine M, Al-Hajje A, Awada S, et al. Evaluation of medication adherence in 24. Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between
Lebanese hypertensive patients. J Epidemiol Glob Health. (2016) 6:157–67. doi: 10.1016/j. dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. (2001) 23:1296–310. doi: 10.1016/
jegh.2015.07.002 S0149-2918(01)80109-0
9. Mroueh L, Ayoub D, El-Hajj M, Awada S, Rachidi S, Zein S, et al. Evaluation of 25. Rifkin DE, Laws MB, Rao M, Balakrishnan VS, Sarnak MJ, Wilson IB. Medication
medication adherence among Lebanese diabetic patients. Pharm Pract. (2018) 16:1291. adherence behavior and priorities among older adults with CKD: a semistructured
doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2018.04.1291 interview study. Am J Kidney Dis. (2010) 56:439–46. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.04.021
10. Bou Serhal R, Salameh P, Wakim N, Issa C, Kassem B, Abou Jaoude L, et al. A new 26. Walker R, James H, Burns A. Adhering to behaviour change in older pre-DIALYSIS
Lebanese medication adherence scale: validation in Lebanese hypertensive adults. Int J populations-what do patients think? A qualitative study. J Ren Care. (2012) 38:34–42.
Hypertens. (2018) 2018:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2018/3934296 doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2012.00262.x
11. Farha L, Abi JJ. Lebanese healthcare system: how will the aftermath look? Cureus. 27. Alsabbagh MH, Lemstra M, Eurich D, Lix LM, Wilson TW, Watson E, et al.
(2020) 12:–e10270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10270 Socioeconomic status and nonadherence to antihypertensive drugs: a systematic review
and meta-analysis. Value Health. (2014) 17:288–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.11.011
12. Paules CI, Marston HD, Fauci AS. Coronavirus infections-more than just the
common cold. JAMA. (2020) 323:707. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.0757 28. Charach A, Gajaria A. Improving psychostimulant adherence in children with
ADHD. Expert Rev Neurother. (2008) 8:1563–71. doi: 10.1586/14737175.8.10.1563
13. Ahmed AAA, Al-Shami AM, Jamshed S, Nahas RF. Development of questionnaire
on awareness and action towards symptoms and risk factors of heart attack and stroke 29. Gold DT, Alexander IM, Ettinger MP. How can osteoporosis patients benefit more
among a Malaysian population. BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:1300. doi: 10.1186/ from their therapy? Adherence issues with bisphosphonate therapy. Ann Pharmacother.
s12889-019-7596-1 (2006) 40:1143–50. doi: 10.1345/aph.1G534
14. Hallit S, Haddad C, Sacre H, Rahme C, Akel M, Saleh N, et al. Medication 30. Costello K, Kennedy P, Scanzillo J. Recognizing nonadherence in patients with
adherence among Lebanese adult patients with hypothyroidism: validation of the multiple sclerosis and maintaining treatment adherence in the long term. Medscape J
Lebanese medication adherence scale and correlates. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. (2021) Med. (2008) 10:225.
9:196–201. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2020.08.014
31. Cohen MJ, Shaykevich S, Cawthon C, Kripalani S, Paasche-Orlow MK, Schnipper
15. Ibrahim L, Ibrahim L, Hallit S, Salameh P, Sacre H, Akel M, et al. Validation of the JL. Predictors of medication adherence postdischarge: the impact of patient age,
Lebanese medication adherence scale among Lebanese diabetic patients. Int J Clin insurance status, and prior adherence. J Hosp Med. (2012) 7:470–5. doi: 10.1002/
Pharm. (2021) 43:918–27. doi: 10.1007/s11096-020-01197-9 jhm.1940
16. El Helou S, Hallit S, Awada S, Al-Hajje A, Rachidi S, Bawab W, et al. Adherence to 32. Mendes R, Martins S, Fernandes L. Adherence to medication, physical activity and
levothyroxine among patients with hypothyroidism in Lebanon. East Mediterr Health J. diet in older adults with diabetes: its association with cognition, anxiety and depression.
(2019) 25:149–59. doi: 10.26719/emhj.18.022 J Clin Med Res. (2019) 11:583–92. doi: 10.14740/jocmr3894