Requirements For Raft and Pile Raft
Requirements For Raft and Pile Raft
In Collaboration With
ANNEX B – REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF RAFT AND
PILED-RAFT FOUNDATION
1.1.1 Raft foundation, also called mat foundation, is essentially a continuous slab resting on the
soil that extends over the entire footprint of the building, to distribute the building load evenly
over a large area of the supporting ground, such that the ground has adequate geotechnical
bearing resistance to resist building loads with acceptable settlement and differential settlement
limits.
1.1.2 Piled raft is a hybrid foundation comprising both a raft and piles, and allows for load sharing
between the raft and piles. In piled-raft foundation, the applied loads are transferred to the
supporting ground through the raft as well as the piles via the complex interactions between piles,
raft and soil. Geotechnical bearing resistance of piled-raft foundation is contributed by both the
raft and the connected piles; with the load sharing between the raft and piles required to be
evaluated and established by the Qualified Person. For an effective application of piled-raft
foundation, the raft of a piled-raft foundation should be founded on competent ground.
1.1.3 The requirements presented in the following sections shall be considered in design and
construction of raft and piled-raft foundation.
1.2.1 Raft and piled-raft should be founded on competent ground which can provide adequate
resistances and stiffness in satisfying both ultimate (e.g. bearing, sliding, overturning resistances
etc.) and serviceability (e.g. settlement, differential settlement and tilt) limit state requirements
prescribed in prevailing codes of practices and BCA’s circulars.
In Collaboration With
REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF RAFT AND PILED-
RAFT FOUNDATION
Objective
This circular is to inform the industry on the requirements for the design and
construction of raft or piled-raft as foundation system for building works in Singapore. The
circular aims to provide a framework based on risk-based approach in stipulating the
requirements for the design and construction of raft and piled-raft foundation, after a
thorough feasibility study and impact assessment conducted by the Engineers to ascertain
the suitability for their projects, in order to achieve safe and robust foundation system for the
buildings.
Background
2. Raft or piled-raft founded on competent ground can provide cost effective solution
for high-rise buildings or infrastructures when properly designed and constructed. Before
adopting these foundation systems, proper characterisation of the subsurface geological
conditions is of critical importance and has to be thoroughly carried out to ascertain their
feasibility. The current provisions in codes and guideline caters mainly for conventional
foundation using piles but there is limited guidance on the soil investigation, design,
construction control and monitoring of foundation using raft or piled-raft system.
4. The joint industry workgroup has reviewed overseas practices, existing literatures,
past projects in local ground conditions and consulted industry practitioners before finalising
the requirements and guidelines in Annex A and Annex B. Annex A describes the classification
of buildings into high, medium and low risk categories. Annex B stipulates the design and
construction requirements for the various risk categories.
5. These requirements and guidelines on the use of raft or piled raft foundation shall be
complied with when making structural plan submissions to the Commissioner of Building
Control. This will take effect for a project with the first structural plan submitted on or after
the date of this circular.
6. Notwithstanding this Circular, all qualified persons must continue to exercise their
engineering judgment and evaluation and take all reasonable steps and due diligence to
ensure that the use of Raft or Piled-Raft foundation will fulfil the objectives and
performance requirements as stipulated in the Fifth Schedule of the Building Control
Regulations 2003 and comply with all relevant standards and codes of practice. Where
applicable, QPs are expected to incorporate more stringent and/or additional requirements
when the circumstances at hand is complicated or the ground condition is highly variable
and complex geologically.
7. Please disseminate the contents of this circular to your members. If you need any
clarification, please contact us at tel. 1800-3425222 or submit your enquiry through BCA’s
Online Feedback Form at https://www.bca.gov.sg/feedbackform/. Thank you.
Yours faithfully
DISTRIBUTION LIST
ASSOCIATIONS / SOCIETIES
PRESIDENT
INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, SINGAPORE (IES)
70, BUKIT TINGGI ROAD
SINGAPORE 289758
PRESIDENT
ASSOCIATION OF CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SINGAPORE (ACES)
18 SIN MING LANE
#06-01 MIDVIEW CITY
SINGAPORE 573960
PRESIDENT
SINGAPORE CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION LIMITED (SCAL)
CONSTRUCTION HOUSE
1 BUKIT MERAH LANE 2
SINGAPORE 159760
PRESIDENT
SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS (SIA)
79 NEIL ROAD
SINGAPORE 088904
PRESIDENT
SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF BUILDING LIMITED (SIBL)
70 PALMER ROAD,
#03-09C PALMER HOUSE
SINGAPORE 079427
PRESIDENT
REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS’ ASSOCIATION OF SINGAPORE (REDAS)
190 CLEMENCEAU AVENUE
#07-01 SINGAPORE SHOPPING CENTRE
SINGAPORE 239924
PRESIDENT
SINGAPORE INSTITUTE OF SURVEYORS & VALUERS (SISV)
110 MIDDLE ROAD #09-00
CHIAT HONG BUILDING
SINGAPORE 188968
PRESIDENT
SINGAPORE STRUCTURAL STEEL SOCIETY (SSSS)
1 LIANG SEAH STREET
#02-11/12 LIANG SEAH PLACE
SINGAPORE 189022
PRESIDENT
GEOTECHNICAL SOCIETY OF SINGAPORE (GEOSS)
C/O GLOBEWERKS INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD
22 SIN MING LANE
#03-85 MIDVIEW CITY
SINGAPORE 573969
PRESIDENT
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS BOARD, SINGAPORE (PEB)
52 JURONG GATEWAY ROAD, #07-03
SINGAPORE 608550
DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE
SCHOOL CAMPUS DEPARTMENT
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION
1 NORTH BUONA VISTA DRIVE
SINGAPORE 138675
AG DIRECTOR
TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION
JTC CORPORATION
THE JTC SUMMIT
8 JURONG TOWN HALL ROAD
SINGAPORE 609434
DIRECTOR
BUILDING
PEOPLE’S ASSOCIATION
9 STADIUM LINK
SINGAPORE 397750
52 Jurong Gateway Road #11- 01 Singapore 608550 Page 5
Tel: 1800 3425 222 | Fax: (65) 6334 4287
www1.bca.gov.sg
PRESIDENT
THE TUNNELLING AND UNDERGROUND
CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY SINGAPORE (TUCSS)
C/O CMA INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANTS PTE LTD
1 LIANG SEAH STREET
#02-12 LIANG SEAH PLACE
SINGAPORE 189022
PRESIDENT
SOCIETY OF ROCK MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
1 LIANG SEAH STREET
#02-12 LIANG SEAH PLACE
SINGAPORE 189022
DIRECTOR
BUILDING AND INFRASTRUCTURE
DEFENCE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY AGENCY
1 DEPOT ROAD
DEFENCE TECHNOLOGY TOWER A
SINGAPORE 109679
The authors and the working committee members of this guide are not to be held liable for any
claim or dispute arising out of or relating to the information provided in this guide.
Professionals in charge of each project are strictly advised to do an independent assessment and
verification to determine if the information provided in this guide is adequate and sufficient for the
needs of their project.
Nothing contained in this guide is meant to replace or negate the need to comply with the
provisions of the Building Control Act and building regulations in all aspects. QPs are to note that
they have duties under the Building Control Act, amongst others, to take all reasonable steps and
exercise due diligence to ensure that building works are designed in accordance with the provisions
of the Building Control Act and building regulations.
In Collaboration With
Risk Category
Low Medium High
Note 2: Underground structures where sum of its weight and imposed loads is less than or
equal to the weight of soil removed for its construction at founding level may be classified as
Medium risk.
Note 3: All buildings with piles are classified as Geotechnical Class 2 Note 1 or higher.
a) Soil profiles consisting soft compressible layers or loose sand of the Jalan Besar, Rochor Clay,
Tanjong Rhu Clay or Kranji Formations, etc. existing beneath or within pressure bulb of the raft
or piled-raft. If unsuitable ground types are present within the pressure bulb, the piles should
generally be designed to support the full structural load without considering the raft. Depth of
this pressure bulb is normally taken as minimum 3 times the width of the raft below its founding
level.
b) Soil profiles that are likely to undergo primary and secondary consolidation settlements due to
dewatering and topping up of ground level by backfilling that leads to change in effective stress
or shrinking of active clay soil.
1.2.3 Ground types suitable for raft and piled-raft foundation for building of 10 storey or higher
shall minimally be hard soil below the founding level. See reference (d) in Section 1.8 for definition
of hard soil.
1.2.4 Where localized pockets of soft soils are found to be present, the exact extent need to be
accurately explored and mapped out, modelled using three-dimensional Finite Element Method
(FEM) and analysed using advanced soil model to have negligible impact on the required
performance of the foundation throughout its design life.
Figure 1 gives an illustration of the pressure bulb to determine the suitability of ground for raft
and piled raft.
1.3.1 Raft and piled-raft foundation increases both vertical and lateral stresses in the underlying
ground, and causes ground movement both in the vertical and lateral directions below and around
its footprint. Under 5th Schedule of Building Control Regulation, the proposed foundation system
shall be designed and constructed such that it will not cause ground movement, during
construction and during its entire service life, that will impair the stability of or cause damage to
adjacent buildings, structures, property, building works, slopes, etc.
1.3.2 In this regard, QP shall evaluate the feasibility of adopting raft foundation for any project
considering the underlying geological and hydrogeological conditions and likely impact onto
buildings, structures, property, building works, slopes that are adjacent or in close proximity. An
impact assessment justifying the suitability of adopting raft foundation without posing any adverse
effect on adjacent structures and their foundations shall be submitted during plan submission to
BCA as required by Building Control Regulation 33.
1.4.1 Adequate site investigation shall be carried out to provide sufficient data, especially on the
ground strength and deformation modulus parameters, to derive the characteristic values of these
parameters appropriate for the adopted constitutive soil model. In addition, the site investigation
shall be planned to delineate each geo-stratum and establish its variabilities accurately.
1.4.2 The proposed boreholes to characterise the soil stratifications below the raft and piled-raft
shall comply with requirements in Table A according to risk categories of the buildings and
structures.
Borehole Refer to GeoSS Same as High Risk a) For raft, minimum 1.5 x width of
investigation Guidelines raft Note 5 below its founding level
depth
b) For piled-raft, in addition to (a),
depth of borehole shall be
greater of:
Note:
1) Reference from BCA (2016) Circular, EC7 and Guide on Ground Investigation and Geotechnical Characteristics
Values to Eurocode 7 published By GeoSS (2015)
2) The upper bound spacing should only be adopted when soil stratification is quite uniform with little
variation.
3) If adjacent buildings/structures/utilities are within 1 time the raft’s width from the raft edge, adequate
ground investigation at raft’s perimeter, wherever possible, needs to be carried out for impact assessment
purpose. This is applicable to all sides of raft with adjacent buildings/structures/utilities in close proximity to
the raft or piled-raft.
4) For a raft supporting 2 or more building blocks or structures with different risk categories, the requirements
of the more onerous risk categories shall be followed for the entire raft.
5) Minimum 2 and 1 number of boreholes per raft or piled-raft respectively for High and Medium risk
categories to have investigation depth of 3 times the width of raft below founding level to ensure that the
geological conditions within pressure bulb is adequately investigated. This requirement may not be required
if:
(a) substantiated by QP for cases where significant competent rock stratum is encountered within a depth of
1.5 times the width of raft below its founding level; assume SIV ok
(b) assessed so by QP for fully underground structures such as tunnels and MRT station
6) bg is width of smaller side of the rectangle circumscribing the group of piles forming the foundation at level
of piles’ toe.
Table B : Soil/Ground Test Requirement for Each Soil Stratum below Founding Level of
Raft/Piled raft
1.5.1 QP shall evaluate the adequacy of geotechnical bearing resistance of the proposed raft and
piled-raft foundation using Eurocode to satisfy the ultimate limit state (ULS).
1.5.2 QP shall also assess raft and piled-raft behaviour in terms of settlement, differential
settlement and induced forces, which are influenced by its interaction with the underlying
ground under the imposed loadings.
1.5.3 For realistic consideration of this soil-structure interaction satisfying serviceability limit
state, QP shall perform the geotechnical analysis based on the risk categories of buildings
and structures as shown in Table C.
• It is required to adopt advanced constitutive soil models that are capable of modelling
the non-linear, stress-dependent, strain-dependent and inelastic behaviour of real soil.
One example is the Hardening Soil Model calibrated to local soil conditions. During
submission, QPs are to submit details on derivation of the required characteristic soil
parameters for such advanced soil models, substantiated by calibration of numerical
parameters with field and/or laboratory tests results.
Table C : Constitutive Soil Model and Methodology Required for Geotechnical Analysis of Raft
and Piled-raft
Item Low Risk Medium Risk High Risk
Constitutive QP to QP to determine Advanced soil
Soil Model determine model
(For ground that had been subjected to
past unloading activities, advanced soil
model is required)
Methodology QP to 2D or 3D FEM 3D FEM
of determine (2D FEM analyses suitable if QP assessed
geotechnical that geometry is regular, loading
analysis conditions & ground stratifications are
uniform)
Figure 2 Example of selection of strain dependent ground stiffness from PMT results at
upper and lower bound ranges and characteristic values
1.5.6 Raft and piled-raft shall be analysed and designed for the actions from columns and core
walls for various possible load combinations of vertical and lateral loads acting on the
superstructures occurring during their design life span as well as uplift from buoyancy
effects, loads and reactions from the ground, in accordance with Eurocodes requirements.
1.5.9 In addition, the actual piles’ length, as estimated from the assumed ratio of pile and raft
load distribution, should be modelled with interface elements to simulate the interaction
Figure 3 Flowchart showing the iterative procedure to determine the structural forces in raft
Adapted from reference (e) in Section 1.8
??
• carry out bulk excavation to within 0.5 to 1 meter above the foundation level. The final
excavation stage is subsequently carried out as a final task, in short bay widths, and the
exposed soil or rock immediately (or within the same work shift) protected by structural
quality blinding concrete;
• avoid excavation to expose the founding ground during inclement weather like heavy
rains, and minimize the duration of exposure through proper construction planning.
1.6.2 QP shall inspect the actual soil/rock conditions encountered at founding level of raft or
piled-raft and verify its geotechnical characteristics to be in consistent with his design
assumptions, and conduct the required verification tests to validate the design assumptions.
If actual soil encountered at founding level is more inferior than the design assumption, QP
shall assess whether ground improvement work need to be carried out or a re-design is
required, before allowing the raft slab to be constructed.
1.6.3 Where applicable and without affecting the performance of buildings, QP shall specify on
plan details of the construction joint between the tower and podium areas to enable some
joint rotation and to reduce the impact of potential differential settlement of the building.
1.6.4 Table D summaries the minimum verification tests and instrumentation & monitoring
regime to be provided for different risk categories of buildings and structures.
Plate load test Minimum 1 test Minimum 1 test per Minimum 1 test per
every 100m2 of raft required borehole within required borehole within
footprint area or footprint of building footprint of building
part thereof works, subject to minimum works, subject to
of 2 tests per raft minimum of 3 tests per
raft
# - For piles within the piled-raft that are subject to working pile load tests, pile head settlements at
1.5 or 2.0 times Working Load are to be less than 15mm and 25mm respectively.
Construction Monitoring
Note:
1) The requirement to monitor raft settlement profile and raft contact pressure may be assessed by
QP to be not required for the following types of structures:
a) Fully underground structures such as tunnels and MRT station.
b) Underground structures supporting light above ground structures such that sum of its weight
and imposed loads is less than or equal to the weight of soil removed for its construction at
founding level.
Table E summaries the allowable building settlement and tilt at serviceability stage for different
risk categories of buildings and structures. These monitoring limits shall be specified on QP’s
drawings and submitted for BCA’s approval.
1.8 References