PEPD Syllabus 2025-2026
PEPD Syllabus 2025-2026
Petroleum
Engineering
and Project
Development
2
E2 & E3 - SECOND AND THIRD COMPANY PERIODS ................................................................... 98
3
PREAMBLE
It provides a solid professional training and a broad-based preparation for the industrial world,
factoring in the environmental and ethical aspects. It leverages the innovation potential of IFP Energies
Nouvelles to prepare its students for an active role in the energy transition and equips them for career
success through cross-cutting professional training and strong international exposure.
The objectives and general approach of the various programs are discussed and approved each year
with the school's industrial partners in Steering Committees, specific to each field. For each program,
the committee meetings identify the knowledge and skills required from the school's young graduates
in terms of knowledge, know-how and professional soft skills.
The programs run by IFP School offer high-level applied courses in which graduates acquire robust
knowledge and skills, which form a lasting foundation for their future professional life and make them
rapidly operational for a vast range of entry-level jobs in one of the major sectors of energy or
sustainable mobility. They are designed to give students an overview of their future industry to
facilitate subsequent job mobility, access to broad responsibilities and long-term career opportunities.
As an applied engineering school, IFP School has brought in interactive learning methods that rely
heavily on teamwork and project work and developed apprenticeship - an integrated academic and
4
corporate training course - in the majority of its programs, thereby involving students in discovery-
driven learning and concrete problem solving.
IFP School encourages its students to draw up a personalized training plan that will enable them to
achieve both the technical objectives specific to each program and the cross-cutting objectives set by
IFP School, namely, to be a responsible professional and be able to fit into a multicultural environment,
work in a team and communicate effectively. With the help of a Professional Project Handbook, their
program syllabus and their supervising tutor, students can build and refine their career plan, and chart
their progress in acquiring knowledge and skills throughout their studies.
Students belong to the IFP School community, which is made up of the school's students, faculty and
alumni. Belonging to this community means upholding the school's three intrinsic values:
Openness: this implies an inquiring mind, willingness to accept change in the world around us,
receptiveness to other people's ideas, a strong ability to work with other people and to take a critical
look at one's own work, and respect for people, their skills and their differences.
Responsibility: this entails clearly stating the responsibilities of each person, to foster initiative and
autonomy.
Solidarity: this goes beyond team spirit. It means that everyone is genuinely cooperating, wants to
make progress all together and is united around shared objectives.
5
AIM AND GENERAL OBJECTIVES OF THE PROGRAM
Environmental considerations are driving the way we manage the sub-surface resources. At the same
time, the continuously increasing energy demand and the energy transition imply changes in the
traditional way we manage the geo-resources.
Aligned with the ongoing energy transition, the PEPD program aims at shaping polyvalent engineers,
trained in the fundamentals of Geo resources development. The program is designed to provide a
comprehensive overview of the 3 key disciplines: reservoir, drilling and production. It addresses the
production of hydrocarbons with reduced CO2 emissions and environmental impact as well as
geothermal energy, geological sequestration of CO2, underground energy storage...
Upon completion of the program, participants have the technical skills to be able to:
6
In addition to the specific technical competencies, students will also develop Soft Skills and project
management key competencies allowing them to:
The program will be taught by a panel mixing specialists from the industry and research engineers from
IFPEN.
For over ten years, IFP School has made Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility a core part
of its strategy.
The Label DD&RS uses a common national reference framework that has existed since 2009 and
respects the French Grenelle environmental laws and other key environmental and social policies. It
also integrates other relevant national and international frameworks like ISO 26000. The Label uses a
systemic approach and integrates the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
7
The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, adopted by all United Nations Member States in 2015,
provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the
future. At its heart are the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which are an urgent call for
action by all countries - developed and developing - in a global partnership. They recognize that ending
poverty and other deprivations must go hand-in-hand with strategies that improve health and
education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth – all while tackling climate change and
working to preserve our oceans and forests.
8
The table below lists the units of the PEPD program and their related SDG.
• All the teaching units are in line with SDG4 (quality education). Special attention is placed on
the teaching materials, pedagogical approach, and support provided to the students. Site visits
included in the program enhance the educational experience by providing students with
hands-on learning opportunities, practical skills development, and exposure to real-world
challenges and solutions in the field of geo-resources development (SGD4).
• Most of the teaching units align with SDG12 by emphasising ways to adopt a responsible and
sustainable approach for the consumption and production of energy.
• Most of the units encourage students to be aware of new technologies and to look for
innovative ways of managing the resources, aligning with SDG9.
• Applications such as the development of geothermal energy and gas sequestration covered in
TU5 contribute to the transition to clean and renewable energy sources, aligning with SDG7
and SDG11 aiming at ensuring access to affordable, sustainable and modern energy for all.
• Controlling the CO2 impact of the activities and field development, and providing solution for
gas sequestration (TU5, TU6, TU12) helps mitigate environmental impact and changes in line
with SDG13.
9
APPRENTICESHIP
Cooperative education has emerged as a natural development of the teaching methods used at IFP
School. Apprenticeship training is an integrated training course that alternates study at the school and
work in the company. This type of training is particularly suitable for an applied engineering school,
providing a smooth transition from general scientific studies to specialized industrial environments.
IFP School's strong focus on applied training and its very close ties to industry naturally led the school
to adopt apprenticeship as its preferred method of training.
IFP School's reference bases of professional skills are drawn up with well-known industrial partners.
They are translated into detailed training objectives and demand appropriate training methods.
These training methods take into account the fact that students need to acquire professional skills: a
blend of knowledge, know-how and soft skills that implies regular on-the-job practice and a thorough
understanding of how engineering sciences can be applied to the sector in question.
In this context, apprenticeship is a particularly well-suited training format in that it allows IFP School
and the company to share responsibility for training the apprentice and facilitating the acquisition of
professional skills. Both the time spent at the school and in the company contribute to build students'
skills. By drawing on what they have learned at the school or with the help of their corporate tutor,
apprentices learn and hone their technical skills and gradually become proficient in the non-technical
aspects of an engineer's work environment.
10
APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAM Coherence & Complementarity
School - Company alternating between school and
training company
To facilitate their dual mentoring, the corporate tutor and the academic tutor rely on regular contact
and a shared online correspondence notebook (on the apprenticeship website of the CFA). Dual
mentoring allows a joint definition of the skills to be acquired during the periods in the company, in
liaison with the program objectives, the apprentice's career aspirations and the evaluation of the
acquisition of these skills.
The periods in the company are assessed by the corporate tutor and the academic tutor, using a
“Company period assessment sheet”, based on the tasks carried out, the abilities developed and the
11
apprentice's behavior. At the end of each period in the company, the assessment sheet is given to the
apprentice, with the corporate tutor's comments.
The skills-acquisition objectives for the periods in the company are defined with the school as part of
"Professional Training Paths". These paths identify the technical skills to be acquired in the company
as an extension of the academic teaching, the technical skills that are new and complementary to the
academic teaching and the professional soft skills acquired in the company.
The conditions for defining apprentices' missions and the calendar of each mission assigned to an
apprentice in the company are described on for the "Company Period Subjects and objectives " sheets
(cf. the "Apprenticeship Handbook"). The corporate tutor is expected to fill out these sheets in
consultation with the academic tutor to ensure that the company and academic periods pursue
coherent learning objectives. The corporate tutor can refer to the Professional training paths and the
Skills dictionary defined by the school for a more precise definition of the skills to be acquired by the
apprentice.
This way, the corporate tutor can give the apprentice engaging missions that are representative of the
engineering profession and correspond to the apprentice's career plan.
Throughout their training, apprentices analyze their progress in acquiring the targeted skills. More
specifically, during each period in the company, they assess their experience and draft an Intermediary
review or a final summary review of the skills developed. These reviews highlight the key points in
relation to progress on their missions, the skills acquired, how they tie in with IFP School's modules,
the difficulties encountered, etc. The reviews also contain apprentices' thoughts on what the period in
the company taught them about other non-technical aspects, such as how the company operates, its
working methods, social and professional relationships, responsibilities, intellectual property, ethics,
etc. They are recorded on the apprentice training center's website (CFA) and viewed both by the
corporate tutor and the academic tutor.
12
Drafting these documents is an integral part of the apprentices' training. The reviews are used by the
corporate tutor and the academic tutor to jointly assess the skills developed by the apprentice during
each company period.
Moreover, the information on this sheet should enable apprentices to take steps to improve, since
they highlight the points for improvement to achieve the objectives set for the end of the company-
school alternating program. In a broader perspective, this assessment should tell apprentices more
about the areas they need to improve so they can focus their efforts on those areas.
The "Experience Sharing Module" (taken by apprentices with five years' higher education – BAC+5) is
a group-work session for apprentices, designed to help them step back and take a more objective view
of their training in the company, contributes to apprentices' reflection on their training. The objectives
and content of the Experience Sharing Module are presented in the second part of the syllabus.
Apprenticeship training through alternating periods at the School and in the company, through dual
mentoring and through apprentices' analysis and objective assessment of their degree of skills
acquisition throughout their training helps them acquire a variety of professional soft skills.
Over and above their proficiency in technical skills relevant to their sector, engineers who graduate
from the program are capable of:
• rapidly sizing up their entry job;
• grasping the features of their work environment and adjusting to the way their host company
operates and the specific features of the energy and sustainable mobility sectors;
• communicating and working in collaborative mode, in English or French, in
multicultural project teams in an in-house setting or with external customers;
• coming to grips with and using off-the-shelf industry software and proprietary IT
tools developed in companies in the energy and automotive sectors;
• committing to the results of their work and reporting to their line management and
colleagues in an appropriate way, written or oral;
• organizing their work in a multitask context and ranking their priorities.
13
Skills development and “Professional Training paths”
The PEPD program is held alternately at IFP School and in the company. In the second part of this
syllabus, you will find the objectives, content and assessment methods of the various Teaching Units
(TUs) dispensed at the school during the different periods of the years.
All of the TUs and the company periods enable apprentices to develop the program's target
skills. To structure this approach and set out the links between the TUs, company periods
and skills, we have defined model training paths known as “Professional Training Paths”.
For the PEPD program, we have selected five typical Professional Training Paths (PTPs) and
drawn up the associated "Skills dictionary".
Competencies
Professional
Job description practiced in
Training Path
Teaching Unit:
Reservoir Engineer responsible for the reservoir TU 1, TU3, TU 4, TU5,
PEPD 1 engineer TU6, TU8, TU11,
evaluation and production or storage
optimization. TU12, PSM, E1, E2, E3
Drilling or Well Engineer responsible for preparing the drilling TU 2, TU5, TU 6, TU 7,
PEPD 2 Engineer program, following up on well operations, TU 8, TU12, PSM, E1,
controlling the costs and safety and E2, E3
environmental aspects.
Production Engineer responsible for overseeing TU 5, TU 6, TU 9, TU
PEPD 3 engineer and optimizing the energy 10, TU 11, TU 12,
production or the storage capability PSM, E1, E2, E3
of a geo-resource.
Engineer responsible for overseeing and TU 1 to 12, PSM, E1,
Project engineer designing the field development and
PEPD 4 E2, E3
architecture.
The objective of the course is to help apprentices acquire the skills required to exercise these
different professions.
All the Professional Training Paths and the Skills dictionary are appended to this syllabus.
For each "Professional Training Path", you will find the link between the skills acquired at the
school (taught TUs) and those that can be acquired during your company period or during
specific modules, such as the PSM (for apprentices with four years' higher education).
14
ORGANIZATION OF COURSES
The program is structured to enable three types of courses to run in parallel:
• conventional course: total duration 16 months
• apprenticeship course School/Company:
o "Bac+5" students: total duration 16 months
o "Bac+4" students: total duration 22 months
The following figures display the organization of these three types of courses.
Continuous program
School period
Company period
HOL Holidays
15
• OST stands for On-site training;
• OSV stands for On-site visits;
• A stands for Assessment.
16
Program PEPD: Continuous path
Term 1
17
Term 2
Term 3
Synthesis
18
Program PEPD: Apprentice Engineers with 5 years' higher education (“BAC +5”)
Term 1
19
Term 2
Term 3
Synthesis
20
Program PEPD: Apprentice Engineers with 4 years' higher education (“BAC +4”)
Term 1
21
Term 2
Term 3
22
Term 4
Synthesis
23
PROGRAM CONTENT
TU 1: FUNDAMENTALS OF GEOSCIENCES ............................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 2: WELL DRILLING ............................................................................ Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 3: GEORESOURCES PRODUCTION ..................................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 4: RESERVOIR MODELING ................................................................ Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 5: GEORESOURCES & ENERGY TRANSITION....................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 6: INTEGRATED PROJECT GENERAL FRAMEWORK ............................. Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 7: WELL ENGINEERING ..................................................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 8: WELL PRODUCTIVITY.................................................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 9: DEVELOPMENT OF GEORESOURCES .............................................. Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU10 PROCESS ENGINEERING................................................................ Erreur ! Signet non défini.
TU 11: INTEGRATED PROJECT AND SITE VISITS ....................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS MODULE (PSM) .................................................. Erreur ! Signet non défini.
EXPERIENCE SHARING (ESM) ................................................................. Erreur ! Signet non défini.
PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION PERIOD (PIP)........................................... Erreur ! Signet non défini.
E1 - INITIAL COMPANY PERIOD.............................................................. Erreur ! Signet non défini.
E2 & E3 - SECOND AND THIRD COMPANY PERIODS ................................ Erreur ! Signet non défini.
24
TU 1: FUNDAMENTALS OF GEOSCIENCES
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit provides students with a comprehensive understanding of the foundational
concepts used in petroleum geoscience.
The students gain insights into various geological approaches via a combination of theoretical
learning, applied exercises, hands-on practices and a field course.
The TU covers methodologies for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Eventually, data
integration will also be tackled as an indispensable step towards reservoir characterization
prior to modeling.
25
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 1.1 Introduction to geosciences 11,5 10 5 1 1
EC 1.2 Geological field course 10 12,5 3 2 1
EC 1.3 Introduction to petrophysics 15,5 10 2 1
EC 1.4 Well logging and well-log analysis 15 5,5 6 1 1
26
EC 1.1 Introduction to Geosciences TU 1 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to Geosciences
11,5 10 5 1
Arnaud TORRES (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• None
GRADING CRITERIA
1hr written quiz at the end of the lecture.
Retake: 30mn oral evaluation
REFERENCES
• Provided course guidelines
• “Elements of geology”, J. Guillemot, Technip Ed., Paris (1996)
27
EC 1.2 Geological Field course TU 1 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Geological field course
Geoffray MUSIAL (Alès School of Mines) 10 12,5 3 2
Arnaud TORRES (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Foundational concepts in geology and stratigraphy
GRADING CRITERIA
A report is to be done by the students throughout the course and hand-it over at the end of
the field course.
Retake: Rework of the booklet
REFERENCES
1. Ales basin field booklet
2. “Sedimentary rocks in the field – A color guide”, D.A.V. Stow, Manson Publishing (2009)
28
EC 1.3 Introduction to petrophysics TU 1 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to petrophysics
15,5 10 2
Stephane RENARD (IFPEN)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in geology, mathematics and physics
GRADING CRITERIA
1 written exam (2 hours).
Retake: 1 written exam (2 hours).
REFERENCES
1. Provided course notes
2. The SI Metric System of Units and SPE Metric Standard
3. Basics of Reservoir Engineering, R. Cossé, Editions Technip (1993)
4. Essentials of Reservoir Engineering (Vol. 2), P. Donnez, Editions Technip (2012)
29
EC 1.4 Well logging and well-log analysis TU 1 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Well logging and well-log analysis
15 5,5 6 1
Jerome LAVAL (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in geology and petrophysics
GRADING CRITERIA
1 written exam (1 hours).
Retake: 1 written exam (1 hours).
REFERENCES
1. Provided course notes
2. Well Logging - Data Acquisition and Applications - O. & L. Serra - Serra Log (2004)
3. Additional reference will be given in the course notes
30
TU 2: WELL DRILLING
OBJECTIVES
This unit prepares the student to define a drilling program and design a well. At the end of the
course, students will be able to design the architecture of a well and specify the equipment
necessary for its construction and operational conditions to maintain maximum safety.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 2.1 Well design and planning 15,5 10 1,5 2
EC 2.2 Drilling engineering 12 10 6 3 1,5 1
EC 2.3 Blowout prevention 10 9 1 1
31
ASSOCIATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
32
EC 2.1 Well design & planning TU 2 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to drilling
3,5
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP training)
Well design & well planning
7 5 1,5
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
Drilling & Casing program
5 5
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics of mathematics
GRADING CRITERIA
One written exam of 1hr30
Retake: 1h30 exam
REFERENCES
1. Drilling, J.P. Nguyen, Éd. Technip.
2. Drilling Data handbook, G. Gabolde et J.P. Nguyen, Ed. Technip
33
EC 2.2 Drilling Engineering TU 2 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Drilling operations
6 4 6
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
Drill bits and BHA
3 3 3 1,5
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
Directional and horizontal drilling
3 3
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics of mathematics
GRADING CRITERIA
One written exam of 1h30
Retake: a 1h30 written exam
REFERENCES
1. Drilling, J.P. Nguyen, Éd. Technip.
2. Drilling Data handbook, G. Gabolde et J.P. Nguyen, Ed. Technip
34
EC 2.3 Blowout prevention TU 2 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Blowout prevention
7 9
Mathieu AVERAN (IFP Training)
1
Practical on drilling simulator
3
(IFP Training)
Total: 20 hours 7 9 3 1
PREREQUISITES
GRADING CRITERIA
1 hr written exam
Retake: 1h written exam
REFERENCES
1. IWCF resources: https://www.iwcf.org/resources/
35
TU 3: GEORESOURCES PRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit introduces reservoir characterization and PVT analysis, focusing on fluid
behaviors under varying conditions using phase diagrams and equations of state. Students will
learn to evaluate reservoir parameters, understand petrophysical data, and apply enhanced
recovery techniques. The course culminates in proposing field development strategies to
optimize recovery factors, blending theoretical knowledge with practical application.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 3.1 Fluids and PVT studies 20 7,5 1,5 1
EC 3.2 Production Mechanisms 20 13 2,5 1,5
36
ASSOCIATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
37
EC 3.1 Fluids and PVT studies TU 3 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Fluids and PVT studies
20 7,5 1,5
Benoit DECROUX (Beicip)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in physics and chemistry
GRADING CRITERIA
1 written exam (1,5 hour duration)
Retake: 1 written exam (1,5 hour duration)
REFERENCES
1. Course notes provided.
2. McCain, William D. The Properties of Petroleum Fluids. PennWell Corp
38
EC 3.2 Production Mechanisms TU 3 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Multiphase Flow
8 3 0,5
Alain AURIAULT (Consultant)
Natural Depletion
8 3 0,5
Alain AURIAULT (Consultant)
Secondary Recovery: Water & Gas Injection
2 3,5 1
Alain AURIAULT (Consultant)
Field Development Methodology
2 3,5 0,5
Alain AURIAULT (Consultant)
PREREQUISITES
• Petrophysics and Fluids and PVT Studies
39
• Secondary Recovery:
o Water & Gas Injection:
Factors impacting recovery.
Analytical evaluation of performances: mobility ratio, scanning
efficiencies (displacement, volumetric, global).
Definition of an injection strategy.
o Specific aspects of injection:
Practical aspects of water injection.
Immiscible gas injection.
Gas recycling in gas condensate fields.
• Field Development Methodology:
o Production planning:
Production level, choice of plateau.
Number, spacing, and positioning of wells.
Perforation strategy.
o Field development examples through exercises:
Oil and gas field development.
Application principles of horizontal wells, performance, drilling
elements, completion, and measurements.
GRADING CRITERIA
2.5 hour written exam.
Retake: 1h30 exam.
REFERENCES
1. Cossé, R. Basics of Reservoir Engineering. Ed. Technip.
2. Dake, Laurie P. Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering. Ed. Elsevier.
40
TU 4: RESERVOIR MODELING
OBJECTIVES
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 4.1 Reservoir Characterization
8,5 1 1 0,5 1
Workflow
EC 4.2 Well Testing 16,5 2 9 2 2
41
PEPD 1 Reservoir engineer
PEPD 2 Drilling or Well engineer
PEPD 3 Production engineer
PEPD 4 Project engineer
42
EC 4.1 Reservoir Characterization Workflow TU 4 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Reservoir Characterization Workflow
8,5 1 1 0,5
Arnaud TORRES (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Geosciences courses
GRADING CRITERIA
30-minute quiz at the end of the lecture.
Retake: 30-minute oral exam.
REFERENCES
1. Consentino, Luca. Integrated Reservoir Study. Institut Français du Pétrole Publications.
2. Schatzinger, Richard A. and Jordan, John F. Reservoir Characterization, Recent
Advances. AAPG Memoir 71.
43
EC 4.2 Well Testing TU 4 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Well Testing
16,5 2 9 2
Vincent JAFFREZIC (TotalEnergies)
PREREQUISITES
• Petrophysics; Fluids and PVT Studies
GRADING CRITERIA
2-hour written exam
Retake: 1.5-hour written exam.
REFERENCES
1. Bourdarot, Gilles. Well testing interpretation methods. Ed. Technip.
44
EC 4.3 Integrated Production Modeling TU 4 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Integrated Production Modeling
9 18,5 1
Carla Castillo (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Production mechanisms courses
GRADING CRITERIA
1-hour case study presentation.
Retake: 1-hour oral exam.
REFERENCES
1. IPM Suite Help Menu
45
TU 5: GEORESOURCES & ENERGY TRANSITION
OBJECTIVES
This course is designed to provide the students with an understanding of the essential
principles and innovative digital methods needed to manage geo-resources effectively in the
context of energy transition.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 5.1 Energy transition context 15 4 6 2 1,5
EC 5.2 Digitalization and management of
25,5 6,5 2 1
georesources
46
ASSOCIATED CAREER PATHS
47
EC 5.1 Energy transition context TU 5 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to Energy Transition
5,5 0,5
Hossein DERIJANI (IFP School)
Subsurface Project Specific to Energy Transition
Mathilde ADELINET (IFP School)
4 6 1
Hossein DERIJANI (IFP School)
Mathieu MONNIER( Technip Energies)
Life Cycle Analysis
5,5 4
TBC (IFPEN)
0,5
Retrofit design
5 0,5
TBC (Total Energies)
PREREQUISITES
• Complete the IFPEN MOOC on Energy Transition online course, validate the entire
course with a minimum grade of 75% prior the start of the TU 5.
48
• The role of stakeholders: governments, businesses, and communities, non-
governmental organizations (NGOs) and international organizations
• Public awareness and education initiatives
• Case studies of successful energy transitions
Underground Gas Storage
Geothermal Projects
49
GRADING CRITERIA
Full completion of MOOC on Energy Transition with the grade of 75% minimum (coef 0,5)
A short report on the course of Life Cycle Analysis (coef 1)
Case study on subsurface project for energy transition including presentation and report
Retake: an oral session of 1 hour.
REFERENCES
1. Portillo, F.; Alcayde, A.; Garcia, R.M.; Fernandez-Ros, M.; Gazquez, J.A.; Novas, N. Life Cycle
Assessment in Renewable Energy: Solar and Wind Perspectives. Environments 2024, 11, 147.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11070147
2. Vinay Kandpal Anshuman Jaswal Ernesto D. R. Santibanez Gonzalez Naveen Agarwa, (2024)
Sustainable Energy Transition: Circular Economy and Sustainable Financing for Environmental,
Social and Governance (ESG) Practices,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52943-6
3. CO2 capture and storage in the subsurface: a technological pathway for combating climate
change, Geoscience issues, BRGM editions, 2007
4. I. Stober, K.Bucher, (2022), Geothermal Energy, Springer, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-
3-030-71685-1
5. M. R. TeK, (1989), Underground Storage of Natural Gas, Theory and Practice, Springer, DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0993-9
6. Bera, A., & Kumar, S. (2024). Subsurface hydrogen energy storage: Current status, prospects,
and challenges. Elsevier
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to Digitalization of Subsurface
5,5
David RHENALS GARRIDO (IFP School)
Subsurface Monitoring
6 3
Laurent ESCARETTE (Storengy)
Digital Twins
6 3 2
David RHENALS GARRIDO (IFP School)
Data Management
5 0,5
Thomas PARENTEAU (Technip FMC)
Digitalization In Drilling
3
Florian MERCIER (HP Inc.)
PREREQUISITES
• Content of previous TUs, from TU 1 to TU 4.
50
PROGRAM AND TRAINING TECHNIQUES
This course introduces the students to the use digital tools in geo-resources management. By
the end of the course, attendees are proficient at implementing digital tools and strategies,
driving innovation, and enhancing productivity of geo-resources.
Participants are introduced to critical areas and practice on real case studies in relation with:
• Digitalization
Definition and concept of digital twins for geo-resources management
Key components and technologies involved
Steps to create a digital twin
Data requirements and sources
Tools and platforms for developing digital twins
Potential challenges and solutions
New application in the field of drilling
GRADING CRITERIA
Written Exam (2 hrs.)
Retake: Written Exam (2 hrs.)
REFERENCES
1. G. Carvajal, M. Maucec, S. Cullick (2017), Intelligent Oil and Gas Fields, Elsevier
2. S. Sankaran, S. Matringe, M. Sidahmed, L. Saputelli, X. Wen, A. Popa, S. Dursun (2020), Data
Analytics in Reservoir Engineering, SPE, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613998205
3. J. Kikani, (2013), Reservoir Surveillance, SPE, DOI : https://doi.org/10.2118/9781613993040
4. Bhowmik, Subrata. "Digital Twin of Subsea Pipelines: Conceptual Design Integrating IoT,
Machine Learning and Data Analytics." Paper presented at the Offshore Technology
5. Conference, Houston, Texas, May 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4043/29455-MS
6. Al Khatib, Habib, Gestin, Kevin, and Jean-Luc Mari. "How frequent and where should you
monitor your CCS field - Focused seismic monitoring to enable predictive maintenance." Paper
presented at the SEG/AAPG International Meeting for Applied Geoscience & Energy, Houston,
Texas, August 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.1190/image2024-4090184.1
51
TU 6: INTEGRATED PROJECT GENERAL FRAMEWORK
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit initiates the work of the integrated project. The project consists in a field
development pre-project study using real data. The students are provided with relevant data
and work in teams to define a development plan. The general objective is to let students put
in practice what they have learnt in the various teaching units concurring to such
developments.
This teaching unit extends the foundational course ‘Integrated Production Modeling’ by
applying modeling concepts in intensive two-week case studies. Students will use datasets to
build and optimize production systems, developing their problem-solving skills and network
design knowledge.
• Analyze complex production system data to identify key performance indicators and
potential bottlenecks within the network.
• Design and optimize integrated production models using MBAL™, PROSPER™, and
GAP™ to meet specific project objectives and enhance overall field productivity.
• Evaluate different development scenarios using probabilistic and deterministic
methods to determine the most effective approach for field development.
• Synthesize reservoir and production data to construct comprehensive field
development plans that incorporate economic, environmental, and technical factors.
• Apply critical thinking to assess and justify the assumptions made during model
construction and propose alternatives based on simulated outcomes.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 6.1 IPM Case Study Application 5 22 0,5 1
EC 6.2 Integrated Project Foundation 2 25 0,5 1
52
Total: 55 hours 7 47 1
53
EC 6.1 IPM Case Study Application TU 6 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
IPM Case Study Application
5 22 0,5
Carla CASTILLO (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Integrated Production Modeling course
GRADING CRITERIA
30-minute presentation at the end of the week.
Retake: 30-minute oral exam.
REFERENCES
• IPM Suite Help Menu
• ‘Integrated Production Modeling’ course notes
54
EC 6.2 Integrated Project Foundation TU 6 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Integrated Project Foundation
2 25 0,5
Carla CASTILLO (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• IPM Case Study Application course
GRADING CRITERIA
Report at the end of the week and 30-minute oral presentation
Retake: rework on the report and/or 30-minute oral quiz
REFERENCES
• IPM Suite Help Menu
• ‘Integrated Production Modeling’ course notes
55
TU 7: WELL ENGINEERING
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit continues the study of drilling process initiated in TU2. The focus will be
placed on the operational conditions.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 7.1 Wellbore stability 8 3 2,5 1
EC 7.2 Drilling Fluids 8 3 1,5 1
EC 7.3 Cementing and integrity 14 5 3 1,5 1
56
ASSOCIATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
57
EC 7.1 Wellbore stability TU 7 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Wellbore stability
8 3 2,5
Frederic BOURGEOIS (Total Energies)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics of petrophysics and geology
• Basics of mathematics
GRADING CRITERIA
2h30mn written exam
Retake: a 2h30mn quiz
REFERENCES
1. Geomechanics applied to the petroleum industry, J.F. Nauroy, Editions Technip, 2011.
2. Course notes provided
58
EC 7.2 Drilling fluids TU 7 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Drilling fluids
8 3 1,5
Ainur Kaken (Consultant)
PREREQUISITES
Basics in mathematics and physics, TU2, TU3 and previous course of this TU
GRADING CRITERIA
Written test (1,5hr)
Retake: written test (1,5hr)
REFERENCES
1. Drilling Data handbook, G. Gabolde et J.P. Nguyen, Ed. Technip
59
EC 7.3 Casing cementing, control & restauration TU 2 Term 1
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Casing cementing, control & restauration
12 4
Ainur KAKEN (consultant)
Well integrity
2 1
Frederic DE MEO (Trident) 1,5
Safety training
GESIP (Groupe d'Études de Sécurité des Industries 3
Pétrolières et Chimiques)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in mathematics and physics, TU2, TU3 and previous course of this TU
GRADING CRITERIA
Two 1h30 written exam
Retake: 1h30 quizz
REFERENCES
1. Well Cementing, Second Edition, Editors Erik B. Nelson and Dominique Guillot (2006)
2. Drilling Data handbook, G. Gabolde et J.P. Nguyen, Ed. Technip
60
TU 8: WELL PRODUCTIVITY
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit focuses on the architecture and equipment installed inside of a well and the
selection criteria based on optimum productivity/ injectivity.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 8.1 Well productivity 11 4 11 1,5 1
EC 8.2 Calculation of the tubing 16 8 2,5 1,5
EC 8.3 Equipment and Treatments 12 3 5,5 1,5 1
61
ASSOCIATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
62
EC 8.1 Well productivity TU 8 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Productivity: reservoir/ borehole interface
9 2
Hosein DERIJANI (IFP School)
1,5
Well performance – Practical work with PROSPER
2 2 11
Hosein DERIJANI (IFP School)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in mathematics and physics
• Previous TUs, particularly TU 3,4
GRADING CRITERIA
One exam of 1hr30mn.
Retake: a 1hr30mn exam.
REFERENCES
1. Course notes of previous TUs.
2. Well completion and servicing, Denis Perrin, Ed. Technip
3. Well production Practical Handbook, H . Cholet, Ed. Technip
4. Petroleum Production Systems, M.J. Economides et al., Prentice Hall Petroleum Engineering
Series
63
EC 8.2 Calculation of the tubing TU 8 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Calculation of the tubing
16 8 2,5
Robert BAIGET (TotalEnergies)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in mathematics and physics
• Previous TUs, particularly TU 1, TU 5, TU 6 and TU 7
GRADING CRITERIA
One 2hr30 written exam
Retake: a 2hr30mn written exam
REFERENCES
1. Well completion and servicing, Denis Perrin, Ed. Technip
2. Well production Practical Handbook, H . Cholet, Ed. Technip
64
EC 8.3 Equipment and Treatments TU 8 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Equipment, Production wellhead
4 1
Christian NGUMA (Total Energies)
Matrix treatment, Hydraulic Fracturing, Sand Control
4 2
Christian NGUMA (Total Energies)
Intervention under pressure, workover, Coiled tubing, 1,5
snubbing 4
Christian NGUMA (Total Energies)
Visit to PCM Pumps manufacturing 5,5
Alban PIERCHON (PCM)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in mathematics and physics
• Previous TUs, particularly TU 2 and TU 7
Matrix treatment
Principle, treatment of carbonates, sandstones, laboratory analysis and additives, operating
procedure.
Hydraulic fracturing: Principle, parameters, fracturing fluids, proppants, improvement.
Sand control
Sampling, particle size curve, chemical processes, mechanical processes, installation
procedure.
65
GRADING CRITERIA
One 1hr30 written exam
Retake: a 1hr30mn written exam
REFERENCES
1. Well completion and servicing, Denis Perrin, Ed. Technip
2. Well production Practical Handbook, H . Cholet, Ed. Technip
66
TU 9: DEVELOPMENT OF GEORESOURCES
OBJECTIVES
The students will get introduced to the fundamental concepts of the development of a
georesource.
They will acquire and practice the knowledge in field development project combined with
their technical engineering expertise to be able to lead and participate efficiently to the
development of a georesource.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 9.1 Fundamentals 11 3,5 2 1
EC 9.2 Georesources development 23,5 12,,25 3 2
67
68
EC 9.1 Fundamentals TU 9 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction to Field Development
4 1,5
Florent PRION (Consultant)
2
EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction)
7 2
Thomas PARENTEAU ( TechnipFMC)
PREREQUISITES
• None
69
GRADING CRITERIA
15% in class Quiz, 85% Written Exam (2hrs)
Retake: Written Exam (1.5 hrs)
REFERENCES
1. Ganat, T. A. O. (2020). Technical guidance for petroleum exploration and production plans.
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45250-6
2. Baron, H. (2018). The oil & gas engineering guide (3rd ed.). Editions Technip.
3. Badiru, A. B., Osisanya, S. O. (2016). Project Management for the Oil and Gas Industry: A
World System Approach. United States: CRC Press.
70
EC 9.2 Georesources Development TU 09 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Offshore Field Development
13,5 3
Christophe CANDELIER (Total Energies)
OLGA Software 2,5
Martin GAINVILLE (IFPEN) 5,5 5,5
Jean-Baptiste FLUTTE (Total Energies)
PREREQUISITES
• All previous teaching units, and EC 9.1
This course provides a comprehensive overview of the technical, managerial, digital, and
economic aspects of offshore georesource development, with a focus on oil and gas
production systems. Participants are guided through the complete lifecycle of offshore field
development—from initial feasibility to offshore implementation and eventual
decommissioning. As part of this course, participants will also be introduced to GAP and OLGA,
two industry-standard simulation tools that support the design and optimization of offshore
georesource developments. GAP enables holistic field development planning by modeling
production networks and identifying performance bottlenecks, while OLGA offers powerful
dynamic multiphase flow simulation, crucial for evaluating flow assurance scenarios.
The following topic are covered in this course.
• Field Development Planning & Execution
o Pre-development studies, technical screening, and economic evaluation
o Development strategy and architecture: centralized vs. distributed systems
o Basic and detailed engineering workflows
o Offshore construction and installation phases
• Project Management & Execution Controls
o Organizational structure and multidisciplinary coordination
o Cost estimation and scheduling under uncertainty
o Quality control, change management, and HSE integration
• Subsea Systems & Infrastructure
71
o Subsea wells, tie-backs, risers, and manifolds
o Selection of offshore facilities: FPSOs, fixed platforms, subsea-to-shore
o Flow assurance: wax, hydrates, and asphaltene control strategies
• Field Decommissioning and Life Extension
REFERENCES
1. Bai, Y., & Bai, Q. (2018). Subsea engineering handbook (2nd ed.). Gulf Professional Publishing.
2. Petroleum Experts. (2024). GAP user manual (Version 4.8) [Software documentation].
Petroleum Experts Ltd. https://www.petex.com
3. Schlumberger. (2023). OLGA user manual (Version 2023.1) [Software documentation].
Schlumberger Limited. https://www.software.slb.com/products/olga
72
TU10 PROCESS ENGINEERING
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit provides the students with an understanding of the fluid behavior from the
wells’ exits to the dedicated storage areas. Students will know the main surface treatments of
effluents, including produced water treatment to reduce its environmental impact, treatment
of injection water, crude oil, condensate, gas processing, and LNG processes.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 10.1 Fundamentals of process 17 7,25 3 1
EC 10.2 Equipment Design 31 4,75 3 2
EC 10.3 Process Operation for Petroleum
41,25 11 3 2
Engineers
73
ASSOCIATED CAREER PATHS
74
EC 10.1 Fundamentals of Process TU 10 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Thermodynamics
11 5,5
Julien GUILLET-LHERMITE (Perenco)
3
Basics of Transport Phenomena
6 1,75
TBD (IFP Training)
PREREQUISITES
• Math and Physics
GRADING CRITERIA
Two written exams, one for each course (3 hrs in total)
Retake: Written exam (2 hrs)
75
REFERENCES
1. Phase Behavior of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids" by Karen Pedersen and Peter L.
Christensen
2. Transport Phenomena, Revised 2nd Edition by R. Byron Bird, Warren E. Stewart, Edwin
N. Lightfoot
76
EC 10.2 Equipment Design TU 10 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Rotating Machines
11
TBD (IFP Training)
Electricity and Power Generation
5,5
Ange NDoudi (IFP Training)
Control Instrumentation
8 3 3
Oleum (Total Energies)
Virtual Pumps Start Up
1 1,75
Mohamad ABDALLAH (IFP School)
Corrosion
5,5
François ROPITAL (IFPEN)
PREREQUISITES
• EC 10.1 Fundamentals
GRADING CRITERIA
Two written exams Rotatin machines and Corrosion(2hrs and 1 hrs)
Retake: written exam(2 hrs)
REFERENCES
1. Arnold, K., & Stewart, M. (2008). Surface production operations: Volume 1 – Design of
oil handling systems and facilities (3rd ed.). Gulf Professional Publishing.
77
2. Arnold, K., & Stewart, M. (2014). Surface production operations: Volume 2 – Design of
gas handling systems and facilities (3rd ed.). Gulf Professional Publishing.
3. Love, J. (2007). Process automation handbook: A guide to theory and practice. Springer.
4. Javaherdashti, R., Nwaoha, C., & Tan, H. (2013). Corrosion and materials in the oil and
gas industries. CRC Press.
78
EC 10.3 Process Operation and Control for Petroleum
TU 10 Term 2
Engineers
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Gas treatment processing
11
Renaud CADOURS (Total Energies)
Crude oil processing
5,5
TBA
Treatment of produced and injection water
5,5
Pierre PEDENAUD (Total Energies)
HSE
5,5 3
Enrique RAMOS (Perenco)
Commissioning and decommissioning
2,75
Frederic De MEO (Trident Energy)
HYSYS
8,25 8,25
Julien GUILLET-LHERMITE (Perenco)
QUESTOR Cost Estimation
2,75 2,75
Jean-Marc SEGUINEAU (Consultant)
PREREQUISITES
• EC 10.1, EC 10.2
This course offers an in-depth exploration of crude oil processing systems and the treatment
of associated fluids, providing students with both theoretical principles and practical insights.
Participants will gain a comprehensive understanding of the processing chain from crude
stabilization through water and gas treatment to condensate recovery and LNG handling. Case
studies, equipment sizing, process optimization, and virtual reality exercises reinforce the
technical content. Following topics will be covered in this course.
79
o Emulsion issues and dehydration methods
o Desalting and desalter sizing
o Acid gas sweetening (H₂S removal)
o Cold and hot stripping methods
o Stripping gas sourcing and treatment
o Optimization of operating conditions for RVP, BSW, and impurities
o Gas dehydration and hydrate control: TEG absorption and adsorption techniques
o Hydrate formation risks and chemical inhibition
o Gas sweetening methods: amine units, physical and hybrid solvents
o H₂S conversion: CLAUS process and tail gas treatment
• Condensate Recovery
80
• HYSYS
o Simulate production systems using HYSYS
o Optimize process flows and troubleshoot designs
GRADING CRITERIA
Written Exam 3hrs
Retake: 2 hrs Written Exam
REFERENCES
1. Arnold, K., & Stewart, M. (2008). Surface production operations: Volume 1 – Design of
oil handling systems and facilities (3rd ed.). Gulf Professional Publishing.
2. Arnold, K., & Stewart, M. (2014). Surface production operations: Volume 2 – Design of
gas handling systems and facilities (3rd ed.). Gulf Professional Publishing.
3. HYSYS Reference Manual
4. Questor Manual
81
TU 11: INTEGRATED PROJECT AND SITE VISITS
INTEGRATED PROJECT
TU 11 Compulsory
AND SITE VISITS
Credits
Term 2 Coordinator: Zita KASPARIAN ECTS
10
OBJECTIVES
This teaching unit continues the integrated project work initiated within TU 6, aiming at the
development of an offshore field.
This case study will be based on an existing offshore field and real data will be provided to the
students. The general objective is to let students put in practice what they have learnt in the
various teaching units concurring to such developments. The work will be mainly teamwork
and the students will be coached, when necessary, by specialists coming from the industry or
research entities.
In addition to the integrated project work, TU 12 includes a week of site visits. This week will
allow the students deepening their knowledge in the industry, through visits to sites, factories
and companies involved in the development and operation of georesources (operators, as
well as engineering and service companies).
At the end of the unit, students will be able to select a development scenario integrating:
• the evolution of reservoir, drilling, well and surface constraints (flow assurance,
processes, structures) during the life of the field
• the safety and environmental protection constraints
• economic data
• market constraints
The project work approach will give them a practical opportunity to:
• Apply the field development project management knowledge and skills to all the
phases of development of a georesource.
• Actively participate in project group meetings and coordinate with different disciplines
to develop detailed plans, including timelines, budgets, and resource allocations for
different phases of a georesource development.
• Use engineering and project management techniques to design and optimize
processes
• Apply risk management strategies to anticipate and mitigate potential issues
• Collaborate effectively with multidisciplinary teams to ensure seamless project
execution
82
• Monitor and control project progress to ensure alignment with goals and objectives.
• Prepare and present technical reports and project documentation.
• Implement sustainable practices and environmental considerations in the
development of a georesource.
They will present a written and oral summary of their results to a jury of professionals.
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A Coeff
EC 11.1 Site visits 27,5 1
EC 11.2 Integrated project 5,5 5,5 36 2,75 6
83
84
EC 11.1 Site visits TU 12 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Site visits 27,5
PREREQUISITES
• Previous TUs
GRADING CRITERIA
A written report.
Retake: a 30mn oral presentation and rework of the report.
REFERENCES
Course notes of previous TUs.
85
EC 11.2 Integrated project TU 12 Term 2
CONTENT
Hours
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Project Management
2,75 2,75
H. DERIJANI (IFP School)
Economics Studies
2,75 2,75
JM. SEGUINEAU (Consultant) 2,75
Integrated Project
Jean-Marc SEGUINEAU (consultant) 36
Florent PRION (consultant)
PREREQUISITES
• Basics in mathematics and physics
• All previous TUs
86
- data collection on the proposed topic,
- establishment of possible development scenarios,
- selection criteria for the appropriate scenarios and a first cost-benefit study to come
up with a recommendation,
• Step 2: Based on the selected scenario,
- process and facility design,
- preliminary dimensioning of structures and pipelines
- implementation and safety,
- more detailed economic study (using QUESTOR software).
• With the help of real documents, from exploration and appraisal wells :
- soil reconnaissance, environmental conditions, site reports
- daily drilling reports, end of hole reports, geological monitoring logs
- drilling and mud programs
• The students make the preliminary project of development wells, its provisional
budget and specify the drilling rig likely to realize it.
• Use professional software drilling-completion calculation software for designing and
monitoring the trajectory, directional behavior and « torque and drag » (WELLSCAN)
or activation (PROSPER).
• Produce a detailed written drilling report and written completion
GRADING CRITERIA
Two evaluations, one based on a report provided by the students at the end of the study
(coefficient 0.7 to compute the final grade of EC12.2), another based on an oral presentation
of the integrated project to a panel of lecturers and industry professionals (coefficient 0.4 to
compute the final grade of EC12.2).
Reports are graded the same for the students in a group. However, the oral grade is
modulated for each participant according to the quality of his/her presentation
REFERENCES
1. Course notes of previous TUs.
2. Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge
(PMBOK® guide)—seventh edition and the standard for project management. Project
Management Institute.
87
PROFESSIONAL SKILLS MODULE (PSM)
Targeted
TU PSM Professional Skills Module (PSM)
students (*)
Term 1 or ECTS
Coordinator: Victor COURT
Term 3 (*) credits: 6
OBJECTIVES
88
ASSOCIATED SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
This teaching unit corresponds to a 3-week project. Different subjects are selected each year
by the IFP School’s management committee. In December 2024, the following two topics are
proposed:
A short description of each project will be sent to you in October 2024. From the provided
descriptions, students will have to choose which project they wish to work on. Within the
project, each subject is studied in parallel by teams of around five students from different
programs. All the information about the PSM will be sent by emails, so please regularly check
your mailbox.
Hours Coefficient
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Problem statement 1
Courses related to the subject (adaptation
to/mitigation of climate change, circular
economy, industrial and territorial 10
ecology, climate corporate strategy) (IFP
School, companies)
How to conduct a project (business model,
marketing & strategy, prototype) (IFP 15
School, companies)
How to convince your audience (pitch
15
training, video making) (lab e.nov)
Project coaching sessions (IFP School,
45
universities and companies)
Final pitch 4 1
Final deliverable - 1
Total: 90 hours 40 46 4
89
(*) During the 3-week PSM, the tutored project led to an equivalence of workload for student of 1.5 hour of
workload for a 1 hour of project.
PREREQUISITES
None
GRADING CRITERIA
Members of the project teams are evaluated on oral presentations, written reports, and
other deliverables of the project. In addition, attendance to the courses and progress
meetings, involvement in this teaching unit, as well as personal performance during the final
oral presentation, will also contribute to the final individual mark.
90
EXPERIENCE SHARING (ESM)
Sandwich
TU ESM Experience Sharing Module (ESM)
students
ECTS credits:
Term 3 Coordinator: Victor COURT
6
OBJECTIVES
91
This teaching unit corresponds to a 2-week project. Different subjects are selected each year
by the IFP School’s management committee. In December 2024, the following four topics are
proposed:
1. Machine learning applied to the Coaches: Frédérique FOURNIER & Karine LABAT
energy sector
2. Critical minerals and materials Coaches: Arnaud TORRES & Maxime SCHENCKERY
management (C3M) for the energy
transition
3. Lifecycle analysis as a lever for Coaches: Denis BOSSANNE & Laetitia SALESSY
decarbonizing industry
A short description of each project will be sent in October 2024. From the provided
descriptions, students will have to choose which project they wish to work on. Within the
project, each subject is studied in parallel by teams of around five students from different
programs. All the information about the ESM will be sent by emails, so please regularly check
your mailbox.
Hours Coefficient
L ICW PW Pr OST OSV A
Introduction of the project (IFP School) 1.5
Courses related to the subject (machine
learning, critical materials, CCUS, life
3.9 3
cycle management, battery recycling) (IFP
School and companies)
How to develop and conduct an
innovative project (Agile innovation,
3
design thinking, legal and economics)
(IFP School)
Project coaching (coaches) 42.6
How to convince your audience (pitch
3
training, video making) (lab e.nov)
Final deliverable - 1
Oral defense 3 1
(*) During the 2-week ESM, the tutored project led to an equivalence of workload for student of 1.5 hour of
workload for a 1 hour of project.
92
PREREQUISITES
This module is based on lectures, videos, interactive questionnaire, and hand-on project, in a
multidisciplinary and multicultural context.
LANGUAGE OF INSTRUCTION
English
GRADING CRITERIA
Students are required to submit to the coaches a final deliverable, possible in the format of a
video or a written document, and to defend their project in a final pitch session.
93
PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION PERIOD (PIP)
Targeted
PIP PROFESSIONAL INTEGRATION PERIOD
students
Credits ECTS
Term 3 Coordinator: school and company supervisor
30
OBJECTIVES
The aim of the professional integration period is to bring an in-depth understanding of the company
and how it operates, of the industrial sector and of the technical and human features of the
profession for which the students are preparing. It also gives them an insider's view of various jobs
they might be led to do later and help them narrow down their subsequent career choices.
Students in the Petroleum Engineering and Project Development program will be involved in a
variety of technical studies and activities ranging from operational work on drilling or production
sites to contribution to structural design and equipment sizing, such as but not limited to:
• Estimate resources,
• Model, analyze and characterize a georesource,
• Select/design drilling program and equipment
• Conduct operation on installation vessel
• Manage logistic, procurement and cost estimate of equipment
PREREQUISITES
The choice of missions lies with the company but must be first validated by the program supervisor
before starting the work placement. Their content must be related to the teaching offered at the
school and provide additional training in the students' technical specialization.
This internship is an opportunity for the students to become an engineer, in the field, faced with the
obligation to produce results. The interns receive mentoring and a work environment focused on
developing their skills. This allows them, on one hand, to learn autonomy, responsibility and working
with tight deadlines, and on the other hand, to consolidate their technical knowledge while
developing real professional experience.
The interns will be assigned a placement supervisor and a school tutor. Intermediate reports with key
facts related to technical and non-technical skills will be sent to the school tutor during the 4.5
months period.
94
GRADING CRITERIA
The final mark for this internship will integrate the following evaluations:
95
E1 - INITIAL COMPANY PERIOD
OBJECTIVES
The knowledge acquired during the first school module should equip the apprentices to be offered
missions, on their arrival in the company, whose content and responsibilities are in line with their
career plan and allow them to be recognized as young engineers in training and fully-fledged members
of the department.
The mission(s) assigned to apprentices during this period are designed to impart or build some of the
industry's technical skills, in connection with what was learnt during the first school module.
At the same time, this part of the training, in a professional context, leads to a gradual command of
the work environment. It may take a wide variety of forms, but generally the following points are
considered essential:
• organization of the company
• role of the host department within the company
• role of the company within its sector
• relations with internal and external customers
• understanding of how a complex organization operates
• the importance of knowledge management for a company.
This initial period is also an opportunity for apprentice engineers to gain an initial experience of many
work-related aspects not directly related to their technical field, such as:
• the importance of being well-organized in their work
• how to manage contacts and relationships within the company
• how their host team operates
• the information channels
• the role of the various meetings
• the ability to present their work and commit to its results.
This initial phase will be reinforced and expanded during the second company internship. Accordingly,
in its new work environment, with the responsibilities incumbent on a young engineer and faced with
specific expectations from management, apprentices will assume their responsibilities, become aware
of their areas for improvement and their needs for additional tools and know-how in order to be fully
operational in their job and efficient in the work in the company.
Upon their return to the school, apprentices have a better understanding of the various teaching units
and their relevance to their career plan, consequently they are more motivated in their training.
96
Students are evaluated through assessment during their company periods as stated in the table
below.
GRADING CRITERIA
Joint assessment by the corporate tutor and the academic tutor of the acquisition or development of
the line-of-business skills identified for the course being taken, along with the professional soft skills:
97
E2 & E3 - SECOND AND THIRD COMPANY PERIODS
Apprentices 5 years’
E2 FINAL COMPANY PERIOD
higher education
Coordinators: school and company Credits ECTS
Term 3
supervisors 24
OBJECTIVES
After the skills-building phases represented by the first company internship and the two periods at
the school, apprentices are capable of understanding and managing more complex problems or
missions. For this purpose, they attend a longer period in the company.
For apprentices with four years' higher education, the third company period often follows on
immediately after the second. It reinforces and broadens the apprentices' skills and can often be
likened to an actual job. It therefore consolidates apprentices' professional experience and helps them
finalize their choice of their first job with a permanent contract.
CONTENTS
The choice of missions lies with the company, but their content must be related to the teaching offered
at the school and provide additional training in the apprentices' technical specialization.
This period is an opportunity for the apprentices to become an engineer, in the field, faced with the
obligation to produce results. The apprentices benefit from their dual status: as company employees,
seen as colleagues by their work colleagues, and as students in training, receiving mentoring and a
work environment focused on developing their skills. This allows them, on one hand, to learn
autonomy, responsibility and working with tight deadlines, and on the other hand, to consolidate their
technical knowledge while developing real professional experience.
These second and possibly third periods bring an in-depth understanding of the company and how it
operates, of the industrial sector and of the technical and human features of the profession for which
they are preparing. They also give apprentices an insider's view of various jobs they might be led to do
later and help them narrow down their subsequent career choices.
Students are evaluated through assessments during their company periods as stated below:
98
Apprentices 4 years’
E2 & E3 2nd and FINAL COMPANY PERIOD
higher education
Coordinators: school and company
Term 3 Credits ECTS 24
supervisors
Coordinators: school and company
Term 4 Credits ECTS 24
supervisors
Interim and summary reviews of the second and possibly the third company periods.
GRADING CRITERIA
- Joint assessment by the corporate tutor and the academic tutor of the acquisition or
development of the line-of- business skills identified for the course being taken, along with the
professional soft skills:
- For final company period, the evaluation of the report and the final presentation.
99
COMPOSITION OF THE TEACHING TEAM
100
NAME COMPANY/INSTITUTE EC COURSES
101
NAME COMPANY/INSTITUTE EC COURSES
102
NAME COMPANY/INSTITUTE EC COURSES
103
CONTACTS
104
Follow us !
Visit our website:
www.ifp-school.com
105