Criticisms of Merton’s Strain Theory
(Individual Level)
Is crime a “lower class” phenomena?
Cannot explain “expressive” crimes
Weak empirical support
Why do people “adapt” to strain in different
ways?
Agnew (1992): General Strain Theory
Overhaul of Merton’s Strain Theory
Three types of strain
1. Failure to achieve valued goals
2. Removal of valued stimuli
3. Can’t escape noxious stimuli
Commonality? All produce negative emotional
states/feelings
– Put a “charge” into people, motivate reactions
Agnew (GST)
StrainNegative Affective States
– Anger, fear, frustration, depression
– Can lead to all sorts of delinqeuncy (not just
economic crimes)
• Illegitamate channels for success (burglary, robbery)
• Attack or escape adversity (assault, truancy)
• Manage through drugs/alcohol
BUT, how do people react to these states?
– Merton: modes of adaptation, but why rebel vs.
innovate vs. ritualism?
– Agnew: it depends on “coping ability”
Coping Strategies
Cognitive options
– “it’s not important,” “it’s not that bad,” “I deserve it”
Behavioral options
– constructively reduce strain, seek positive solution
Factors that facilitate coping
– intelligence, problem-solving skills, creativity…
Factors that inhibit coping
– delinquent peers, criminal disposition, weak social
bonds, weak moral beliefs...
Agnew (GST)
Tests of GST are favorable
But, is it “STRAIN” or something else?
– Very different from Merton
– Is this theory a theory of “Strain” or a
theory of “STRESS?”
Pirating other theories?
– Use of control, SLT variables to explain
coping
Strain vs. Control or Learning
Control theory
– Focus on positive relationships that reduce
delinquency
SLT
– Focus on positive relationships that can either
reduce or increase delinquency
Strain
– Focus on negative relationships that increase
delinquency
Review of GST
3 sources of strain
Strain produces negative affective states
– Anger most important
– Charges individuals for action
– “External motivation”
In absence of coping, delinquency is likely
– Uses learning and control variables to indicate
whether “coping” is likely
Addressing criticisms of “Classic strain
theory”
1. Strain theory only applies to lower class
GST: applies to all classes (all feel strain)
2. Why different reactions to strain (modes of
adaptation)?
GST: depends on coping ability, constraints on
coping
3. Weak empirical support
GST: moderate to strong empirical support
4. Strain theory only explains economic crimes
GST: explains all types of delinquency/crime