Recycled
Reusable
Candle Holder
“We hold the light.”
Submitted By: GROUP 4
Bonsol, Joshua
Angeles, Cedric
Follosco, Trevor
Eliza Hannah May Seballos
Josiah David Cordero
Niña De Chavez
Jean Pierre Banawa Palad
Figure 1. Respondents’ Light Sources During Emergency.
It resulted that LED rechargeable light/lamps has a high percentage of responses among the other choices.
Figure 2. Willingness Of The Individuals To Use/Continue Using Candles.
It shows that the choice of Yes of the respondents of the survey on the willingness to continue using candle for emergencies has a high percentage.
Figure 3. The Price Of Candle The Subjects Accept.
The choice of five to twenty pesos(Php 5-20) and twenty-one to thirty pesos(Php 21-30) on how are they willing to pay for a candle almost had the
same percentage answered by our respondents.
Figure 4. Usage Frequency Of Surveyees Of Candles.
In question four, thirty-five point four percent(35.4%) of our hundred-sixty four(164) respondents chose twice a year on how often they use a candle.
While thirty-four point one percent(34.1%) responses for once a year and a thirty point five percent(30.5%) responses for multiple times in a year.
The results shows an almost equal percentage among the choices.
Figure 5. Participants’ Responses If They Purchased Candles Encased In Cups/Glasses.
In question five, sixty-five point eight percent(65.8%) of our hundred sixty-four(164) respondents answered for Yes in purchasing a candle that
is encased in a glass/cup while thirty-four point two percent(34.2%) answered for No which means many of the respondents already used
encased candles.
Figure 6. Awareness Of Testees On Conservation Of Environment Thru Reusable Candle.
In question six, a large percentage of our respondents chose Yes on the question in which were they aware that there is a way that they can help
conserve the environment through the use of reusable candle holder.
Figure 7. Knowledge Of Questionees In Products That Reuse Candles.
In question seven, sixty-five point 9 percent (65.9%) are aware that there are other candle holders that let the candle to be reused while
the remaining thirty-four point one percent(34.1%) are not.
Figure 8. Desire Of Survey Respondents To Buy Candle Holders With Added Features.
In question eight, seventy-five point six percent(75.6%) of the respondents answered that they are willing to pay for a candle holder that have an
extra use and only twenty-four point four percent(24.4%) are not, in conclusion, the participants are eager to purchase candle holder with added
features.
Figure 9. Potential Buyers’ Inclination To Purchase Candle Holder For Charity.
In question nine, Majority of the respondents answered yes with eighty-four point eight percent(84.8%) that they are willing to purchase for
a cause and the remaining fifteen point two percent(15.2%) are not, hence users are more inclined in purchasing the candle holder for
charity.
Figure 10. Eagerness Of People To Pay For Candle Holders.
In question ten, In having the price for the candle holder, there are two prices the respondent chose, it’s fourty-one to sixty pesos(₱41-60)
with a fourty-seven percent(47%) approval and twenty to fourty pesos(₱20-40) with a thirty-two point percent(32.9%) approval, the others
are sixty to eighty pesos(₱61-80) with thirteen point four percent(13.4%) approval and greater than eighty-one pesos(₱81) with a six point
seven percent(6.7%) approval.
