Wind loading and structural response
Lecture 22 Dr. J.D. Holmes
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free walls, roofs and billboards
• free-standing walls
• elevated walls and billboards
pw pL
C pn 2
1
ρ
2 a U h
• free roofs and canopies
pU pL
C pn 2
1
ρ
2 a U h
Free walls, roofs and billboards
• attached canopies
• solar panels
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 90o to plane of wall (lecture 8, Chapter 4)
CD = 1.2 CD = 1.1
Ground Ground
TWO-DIMENSIONAL WALL SQUARE WALL
reference U taken as Uh (top of wall)
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 90o to plane of wall (lecture 8, Chapter 4)
reference U taken as Uh (top of wall)
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 90o to plane of wall
b
Maximu h
3 m
Cpn
Mean
1
00.1 1 10
100
b/h
Jensen Number (h/zo) = 50 to 160
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 45o to plane of wall
4
b
h
3
Maximum
Cpn
2
1
Mean
0
0.1 1 10 100
b/h
Jensen Number (h/zo) = 50 to 160
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 45o to plane of wall mean Cpn
b/h=2
1.6 1.0
b/h=3
1.9 1.4 0.7
b/h=5
2.2 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.6 0.4
b/h=10
2.7 1.8 1.4 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6
Net pressure difference high for first 1-2 wall
heights from windward end
Free walls, roofs and billboards
free-standing walls
• wind at 45o to plane of wall mean Cpn
4
225
no corner 45
y
45
3
Cpn corner 45
infinite 45
corner 225
1
no corner 225
0 0.1 1 10 100
y/h
Effect of corner is to reduce largest net pressure
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Parallel free-standing walls (noise barriers on urban freeways)
s
• wind at 0o to plane of walls h
5
4
Net pressure coefficients
3
Mean
2
r.m.s.
1
Maximum
0
Minimum
-50 -40 -30 -20 -10-1 0 10 20 30 40 50
-2
-3
wall spacing/wall height
Shielding
significant shielding effects up to 10 wall heights separation
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Billboards
• wind at 0o to plane of board mean Cpn
Cpn 1.5 =
=
effect of elevation : increase magnitude of mean net pressure coefficient
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Billboards
• wind at 45o to plane of board mean Cpn
2c
1.5 1.1 c
45 o
Ground
Free walls, roofs and billboards
New table proposed for ASCE-7-05
• Solid freestanding walls and solid signs
B CASE A
WIND
NORM AL TO
WALL
SOLID SIGN OR
FREESTANDING WALL
s
h
CASE B
WIND AT 4 5°
TO WALL
GROUND SURFACE
• Force coefficients Cf given as function of clearance ratio, s/h, and aspect ratio, B/s
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Walls on bridges
• wind at 0o to plane of wall
Mean
r.m.s.
Maximum s
5
Cp
upwind 4
wall 3
2
1
0
0 1 2 3 4
s/h
Coefficients based onU at top of wall : little effect of s/h ratio
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free-standing roofs
pnet
flat
pnet
pitched
pnet troughed
Usual convention : positive net pressure is downwards
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free-standing roofs
pnet
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free-standing roofs
pnet
Effect of stored goods : flow stagnates underneath - pnet goes more negative
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free-standing roofs pitched - full scale
d=9.3 m
Upper surface
Lower surface
0.5
Mean pressure
0
coefficient
0 4.65 9.3
-0.5
-1
-1.5
Distance from leading edge (m)
upper surface pressures dominate - especially near the ridge
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Free-standing roofs pitched - model tests
5 degrees pitch 10 degrees pitch
15 degrees pitch 22.5 degrees pitch
30 degrees pitch
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
Cp (mean)
0
-0.2
-0.4
-0.6
-0.8
-1
0 30 60 90 120 150 180
angle of attack (degrees)
high positive and negative values for
roof pitches of 22.5o and 30o
Cpn averaged over half a roof
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Attached canopies (over loading bays etc.)
zero pitch - model scale
-4.0 wc
h
- Ĉ pn 1.0 1.3 c
hc/h =1
wc
h
Cpn
hc
-3.0 or 4.0, whichever is the lesser
hc/h=0.75
-2.0 h
- Ĉ pn 1.0 0.4 c
wc
-1.0
hc/h=0.5
or 4.0, whichever is the lesser
0.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
2.5 3.0
Canopy height-to-width ratio, hc/wc
when mounted near the top of the wall, uplift force is high
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Solar panels on roofs of buildings
wind loads are affected by many parameters :
d
e h2
c
h1
w
Free walls, roofs and billboards
Solar panels
• ‘stand-off’ distance reduces net load normal to roof
• higher roof pitch produces less uplift force
• panel near eaves or gable ends experience higher loads
• generally better to mount parallel to roof slope ( = 0)
End of Lecture 22
John Holmes
225-405-3789 JHolmes@[Link]