Principles of Business Management Overview
Principles of Business Management Overview
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
Management is a set of
activities directed at an
organization’s resources with
the aim of achieving
organizational goals in an
efficient and effective manner
Management in
Organizations
Planning
and decision Organizing
making
ts from the environment
man resources Goals attained
nancial resources • Efficiently
ysical resources • Effectively
ormation resources
Controlling Leading
The Business
Environment
External environment: a set of forces and
conditions outside the organization that can
influence its performance
Task environment: forces that have a high
It is a process
A series of activities and operations, such as
planning, deciding, and evaluating
Of assembling and using sets of resources
Human, financial, material and information
In a goal‑directed manner to accomplish tasks
A purposeful activity
In an organizational setting
It is undertaken in organizations
By people with different functions intentionally
structured and coordinated to achieve common
purposes
Concept of
Management :-
Organized Activities
Existence of Objective
Relationship among Resources
Working with and Through People
Decision Making
Nature of Management
Multidisciplinary –physiology,
physchology,economics etc
Dynamic Nature of Principles –cause and
effect ,change with the environment.
Relative not absolute Principles – According to org.
Management Science or Art – It is both
Management as a Profession -
Universality of Management – Management is
universal but principles are not.
Mgmt Science or Art ?
Science Art
Advances by Knowledge Advances by
Practice
Proves Feels
Predicts Guesses
Defines Describes
Measures Opines
Impresses Expresses
Mechanized Creative
Purpose & Scope of Mgmt
1. To increase efficiency
2. To Crystallize the Nature of
Management
3. To Carry on Researches
4. To Attain social Objective
To Increase Efficiency :-
.
For a systematic theory to evolve it is necessary to carry
out empirical research. Given the nature of
interdisciplinary nature of management it is necessary
that management field is well integrated with other
disciplines.
To Attain Social Objectives
Planning
ng
olli
Sta
nt r
f fin
Co
Coordination
g
Organizing
Directing
Management
Functions :-
Planning involves
Estimating future conditions and
circumstances
Making decisions based on these
estimations about what work is to be done
By the manager
By all of those for whom she or he is
responsible
Organizing :-
Controlling Leading
Monitoring Motivating members
and correcting of the organization
ongoing activities to work in the best
to facilitate goal interests of the
attainment organization
Managerial Roles
Interpersonal
Roles
Figurehead
Leader
Liaison Decisional Roles
Informational Roles Entrepreneurial
Monitor Disturbance Handler
Disseminator Resource Allocator
Spokesperson Negotiator
UNIT 1 Part-2
Development of Management
Thought - Scientific management;
Contribution of Taylor, Fayol, Mary Follet,
Elton Mayo; Hawthorne experiments,
Contingency approach
Development of Mgmt Thought
and Principles of Management
Management Thought Period
Scientific Management
Frederick Taylor
The Gilbreths
Henry Gantt
Steps in Scientific
Management
1 2 3 4
Supervise employees
Develop a science Scientifically select Continue to plan
to make sure they
for each element of employees and then follow the prescribed the work, but use
the job to replace old train them to do the job workers to get the
methods for performing
rule-of-thumb methods as described in step 1 work done
their jobs
Taylor & Scientific
Management
Fredrick Winslow Taylor :- SM is concerned with knowing
exactly what you want men to do and then see in that
they do it in the best and cheapest way.
He put the emphasis on solving managerial problem in
scientific way.
He joined Midvale Company,USA as a worker and then
promoted to supervisor.
After completion of ME degree he joined Bethlehem
Steel Company
He carried experiments on how to increase efficiency.
He published many papers and books and all his
contributions were compiled in his book “Scientific
Management”.
Principles of Scientific
Management
Administrative Management –
focuses on managing the total
organization
Henry Fayol
Lyndal Urwick
Max Weber
Weber’s Theory of
Bureaucracy
Division of labor
Reliance on rules and regulations
Hierarchy of authority
Employment based on expertise
Inflexible
Rigid
Impersonal
Fayol’s Administrative
Management
Ethical dilemmas
The choice between two competing but
arguably valid options
Frameworks for ethical decision making
Utilitarian approach
Moral rights approach
Universalism approach
Justice approach
Basic Approaches to Ethics
Utilitarian Approach
Focused on the consequences of an
action
What is the “greatest good?”
Different people may see the outcome
differently in terms of good or bad
Basic Approaches to Ethics
Moral Rights Approach
Focused on an examination of the moral
standing of actions, independent of
their consequences
Some actions are simply “right” or they
are “wrong”
When two actions both have moral
standing, then the positive or negative
consequences of each will determine
which is the more ethical decision or
action
Basic Approaches to Ethics
Universal Approach
“Do unto others as you would have
them do unto everyone, including
yourself.”
Choose a course of action you believe can
apply to all people under all situations
The issue of rights
Rights stem from freedom and autonomy
Actions that limit freedom and autonomy
generally lack moral justification
Basic Approaches to
Ethics Justice Approach
How equitably are the costs and benefits of
actions distributed?
Costs and benefits should be equitably distributed
Rules should be impartially applied
Those damaged because of inequity or
discrimination should be compensated
Distributive justice
Equitable distribution is based on performance
Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision
Making
Moral intensity
The degree to which people see an issue
as an ethical one
Six components
Magnitude of the Temporal immediacy
consequences Proximity
Social consensus Concentration of effect
Probability of effect
Moral Intensity in Ethical Decision
Making
Magnitude of the
consequences Ma
g
Co nitu
Level of impact ns d e
eq
ue of th
anticipated nc e
es
Impact is Moral
independent of Intensity
whether
consequences are
positive or negative
Consequences
Social consensus
Social
The extent to which M
ag
members of a C n
on itud
se e o
qu
society agree that an en f the
ce
s
act is either good or
Moral
bad Intensity
Population diversity
weakens social
consensus
Consequences
Social
Probability of effect
Ma
How likely people g
Co nitu
ns d e a
ity
bil t
eq
ue of th ob ec
think the nc e
es
Pr f Eff
o
consequences are
Moral
The higher the Intensity
probability of the
consequence, the
more intense the
sense of ethical
obligation
Consequences
Social
Temporal
immediacy
Ma
g
Co nitu ity
ns d e a bil t
eq
ue of th ob ec
Pr f Eff
Interval between the nc e
es o
Consequences
Social
Proximity
Ma
The closeness the g
Co nitu ity
bil t
ns d e a
decision maker feels to eq
ue of th
nc e
ob ec
Pr f Eff
o
those affected es
Proximity
has ethical implications
Consequences
Social
Concentration of
effect
Ma
g
Co nitu ity
ns d e a bil t
eq
ue of th ob ec
Pr f Eff
Focus of effect on nc e
es o
Proximity
to feelings of
greater ethical
responsibility
Adapted from Exhibit 5.2: Factors of Moral Intensity
Making Ethical Decisions
The manager
The organization
Code of ethical conduct
Formalstatement outlining types
of inappropriate behavior addressing three
issues
Being a good “organization citizen”
Guiding employee behavior away from unlawful or
improper acts that could harm the organization
Addressing directives to be good to
customers
Successfully Implementing Codes of
Ethics
Communication Training
Implementing
Code of Ethics
Reward and
Whistle-blowing
Recognition
Definition of Culture
Culture
Learned set of assumptions, values, and
behaviors
Accepted as successful
Passed on to new comers
Culture begins when a group of people
faces a set of challenges
Culture evolves and changes with time
Managerial Relevance of Culture
Feedback
Planning a Pervasive Process :- Every
manager has a planning function to
perform. It a fundamental management
functions. It takes over again and again.
Importance of
Planning :-
Primacy of Planning
To offset uncertainty and Change
To focus attention of objective
To help in coordination
To help in control
To increase organizational effectiveness.
Steps in Planning /
Stages
1) Perception of Opportunities
2) Establishing Objectives
3)Planning Premises
4) Identification of Alternatives
5)Evaluation of Alternatives
6)Choise of Alternative
7)Formulation of Support & derivative Plans
8)Establishing Sequence of Activities
The Planning Process
Analyze environment
(forecasts, benchmarks, contingencies,
competitor analysis, scenarios)
Set objectives
Determine Assess
requirements resources
Implement plans
Feedback Feedback
Monitor outcomes
Adapted from Exhibit 8.4: Planning Process
Types of Planning
What is Plan ?
It is a commitment of resources to a
particular course of action believed
necessary to achieve specific goal.
Plans
Plans
Time Typically 3-5 years Often focused on 1-2 Usually focused on the
years in the future next 12 months or less.
horizon
Scope Broadest,originating Rarely broader than a Narrower, usually cen-
with a focus on the strategic business unit tered on departments or
entire organization smaller units of the
organization
Complexity The most complex and Somewhat complex but The least complex,
general, because of the more specific, because because they usually
different industries and of the more limited focus on small
business potentially domain of application homogenous units
covered
Mission Statement
Strategic
Tactical
Operational
Plans Are Classified on Their
Scope
Strategic
Tactical
Plans become
more specific as Operational
they move
from strategic
to operational Contingency
Standing Plan :-
lan
Co
rp
Objectives
n
de
tri
or
bu
Strategies
tes
er
low
Policies
ve
er i
Budgets
Quotas and Targets
Characteristics of a good
plan
?
Characteristics Characteristics
Knowledge Unfamiliarity
Ability Ambiguity
Motivation Complexity
Instability
Decision Environment
Characteristics
Irreversibility
Significance
Accountability
Time and monetary
constraints
Types of Decisions
Programmed and Non-programmed
Decisions
Strategic and Tactical Decisions
Programmed Non-
Decision programmed
Decisions Decision
Poorly defined or
Simple/routine novel problem
problem No alternative is
High levels of clearly correct
certainty Past decisions of
Rules and little help
procedures Gresham’s law of
Standard planning
operating
procedures (SOP)
Decision-Maker Level and
Type of Decision
Top
Managers
Middle
Managers
Lower-Level
Managers
Non-programmed Decisions
Programmed Decisions
Adapted from Exhibit 9.4: Decision-Maker Level and Type of Decision
Strategic Decision :- is a major choice of
actions concerning allocation of resources and
contribution to the achievement of organizational
objectives.
1)Major decision that affects whole or major part of
org that contributes directly to org’l objective.
2)Major departure from earlier ones concerning some
org’l practices e.g. change in product mix,
expansion of business, change in personnel policies
3)Normally a non-programmed decision.
4) Three elements a) A course of action or plan
known as action element b) A desired result or
objective to be achieved , result element. c) A
commitment , which directs some part of org to
undertake a course of action, make ppl responsible
and allocate them resources.
Tactical Decision : Operational decisional is
derived out of strategic decision. It related
to day to day working and is made in the
context of well set policies and procedures.
Example :- Purchase of raw material etc
1)Programeed 2) The outcome is short term
nature, affects small part of
organization.3)The authority for making
tactical decision can be delegated to lower
level management.
Evaluating Alternatives in the
Decision-Making Process
No No No
3)Personal Development
4)More Risk Taking
Negative Aspects
1) Time consuming and Costly
2) Individual Domination
3) Problem of responsibility
4) Group Think
Groupthi
nk
A situation that occurs
when a group or
team’s desire for
consensus and
cohesiveness
overwhelms its desire
to reach the best
possible Studies (Vol.decision.
Source: Gregory Moorhead, Group &
Organizations 7, No. 4), pp.
429-444. Copyright © 1982 by Sage
Publications, Inc. Reprinted by permission
of Sage Publications, Inc.
Illusions of invulnerability creating excessive optimism and
encouraging risk taking.
Rationalizing warnings that might challenge the group's
assumptions.
Unquestioned belief in the morality of the group, causing
members to ignore the consequences of their actions.
Stereotyping those who are opposed to the group as weak,
evil, disfigured, impotent, or stupid.
Direct pressure to conform placed on any member who
questions the group, couched in terms of "disloyalty".
Self censorship of ideas that deviate from the apparent group
consensus.
Illusions of unanimity among group members, silence is
viewed as agreement.
Mindguards — self-appointed members who shield the group
from dissenting information
Preventing groupthink
According to Irving Janis, decision making groups are not neces
sarily destined to groupthink. He devised seven ways of preve
nting groupthink (209-15):
Leaders should assign each member the role of “critical evalua
tor”. This allows each member to freely air objections and dou
bts.
Higher-ups should not express an opinion when assigning a tas
k to a group.
The organization should set up several independent groups, w
orking on the same problem.
All effective alternatives should be examined.
Each member should discuss the group's ideas with trusted pe
ople outside of the group.
The group should invite outside experts into meetings. Group
members should be allowed to discuss with and question the o
utside experts.
At least one group member should be assigned the role of Devi
l's advocate. This should be a different person for each meetin
g.
Unit 4 part B
1) As Entity
2) As Group of People
3) As Structures
4) As Process
Principles of
Organization
Classical Organization Theory
Neo-Classical Organization
Theory
Modern Organization Theory
1) System Approach
2) Contingency Approach
Classical Organization Theory –
closed system
1) Division of Labor
2) Scalar and Functional Processes
a) Departmentation b) Coordination
of Hierarchy c) Unity of
Command
d) Delegation of Authority e) Line
and Staff Relationship
3) Structures
4) Span of Control
Neo-Classical Theory –open system
1) Flat Structures
2) Decentralization
3) Informal Organization
Modern Organization Theory
System Approach
1) Technical Subsystem 2)Social
Subsystem 3)Power subsystem
4)Managerial Subsystem
Organizational charts
Illustration of relationships
Units
Lines of authority among supervisors and subordinates
Illustrated by use of labeled boxes and connecting lines
Integration
Integration
Facilitation of cooperation and interaction
of various parts of the organization
Interdependence
Pooled
Sequential
Reciprocal
Formalization
Formalization
the official and defined structures and
systems in decision making,
communication, and control in an
organization
Line of authority
Unity of command
Span of control
Informalization
Informal organization
Unofficial but influential means of
Communication
Decision making
Control
Centralization and
Decentralization
Centralized organizations
Restrict decision making to fewer
individuals, usually at the top of the
organization
Decentralized organizations
Tend to push decision-making authority
down to the lowest level possible
Features of Good
Organization structures :-
1) Simplicity
2) Flexibility
3) Clear line of authority
4) Application of Ultimate Responsibility
5) Proper delegation of authority
6) Minimum possible managerial levels
7) Principles of Unity of Direction and
Command
8) Proper Emphasis on Staff
9) Provision for Top Management
Types of Organization
Structures
Tall Structure Organization
Flat Structure Organization
Functional Structure
Product Structure
Divisional Structure
Territory /Regional Structure
Customer Structure
Matrix Structure
Hybrid Structure
Functional Structure
Strengths
Small to medium-sized Weaknesses
firms with limited product Weak coordination across
diversification functional groups
Specialization of Restricted view of overall
functional knowledge organizational goals
Less duplication of Limits customer attention
functional resources Slower response to market
Facilitates coordination changes
within functional areas Burdens chief executives
with decisions
Product Structure
Strengths Weaknesses
More focus on products Duplication and lack of
and customers economies of scale
Easier to evaluate Problems for customers
performance of the purchasing across multiple
product product groups
Product responsiveness Conflicts between product
to market changes group and corporate
Less burden on the top objectives
executive in making Conflict between product
operating decisions groups
Division Structure
Weaknesses
Strengths
Most appropriate only for
Reduced functional diversified, large
duplication companies with many
Customer focus can products and product
increase families
May inhibit cross-division
Cross-product
coordination
coordination is eased
Coordination difficulties
Cross-regional between division and
coordination is often corporate objectives
eased
Customer Structure
Strengths Weaknesses
In-depth understanding of Duplication of functional
specific customers resources in each customer
unit
Responsiveness to Coordination between
changes in customer customer units and corporate
preferences and needs objectives
Responsiveness to moves Failure to leverage
by competitors to better technology or other strengths
serve customers in one unit across other units
Matrix Structure
Strengths Weaknesses
Information flow Complexity of performance
Decision quality evaluations
Suited to a changing and Inhibited ability to respond to
complicated business changing conditions
environment Diffused accountability
Flexible use of human Conflicts between differing
resources perspectives and objectives