BUSINESS ETHICS AND
SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
MODULE 5
“Values are
caught and not
“Ethics may not
be teachable in
the same way as
astronomy or
psychology, but it
FOUNDATIONS
OF PRINCIPLES
OF BUSINES
ETHICS
“Educating the mind
without educating
the heart is no
education at all.”
CLASSICAL
PHILOSOPHI
ES
Business Ethics as an applied branch
of general ethics must be studied from
the perspective of philosophy. This is
because ethics is a part of moral
principles, you will not know ethics
without being philosophical.
Ethics and Philosophy
Philosophy, etymologically came from
two Greek words philos, which means
love and sophia, means wisdom. (Love of
Wisdom). Hence, a philosopher is one
who loves wisdom.
As a science, philosophy is interested with
the meaning of reality including our human
experiences. It is a science that seeks to
explain the ultimate cause of everything by
the use of human reason alone.
Ethics is philosophical science that
studies the morality of human act. As a
science, Ethics is concerned with the
analysis of the nature of the human
conduct from the point of view of morality.
ETHICAL
FOUNDATIONS
OF BUSINES
ETHICS
Consequentialism
In moral philosophy, the term
“consequentialism” refers to an approach
in moral decision making wherein the prime
consideration is the effect or consequence
of an action or a decision.
For the consequentialist, an action is morally
acceptable if leads to some desirable
consequences.
The rightness or wrongness of an action can
be established by reference to its consequences.
Ethical Egoism
It is founded on psychological egoism.
“Psychological egoism is the doctrine that
everyone is motivated to look after his or
her own perceived best interest.”
It describes human nature as
basically selfish, self- interested, and self-
centered. It assumes that people never
act except with a personal benefit in
sight whether or not they admit it.
For the ethical egoist, a good
act is one that produces a good
consequence for the individual
who performs the act.
Utilitarianism
The renowned proponents of
modern utilitarianism are the English
philosophers Jeremy Bentham and John
Stuart Mill.
Utilitarianism
Bentham’s version is now
commonly known as act utilitarianism
while that of Mill is rule utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism
Like ethical egoism, it is also a
consequentialist approach to ethical
decision making.
Utilitarianism
The utilitarian’s main concern is not
individual interest. The utilitarian looks for
the one that has good consequences or
benefits, for the most number of affected
people.
Its principle of justice may be
stated as: “everybody to count for
one, nobody to count for more
than one.”
Virtue Ethics
Virtue is a sort of knowledge (the
knowledge of good and evil) that is
required to reach the ultimate good, or
eudaimonia, which is what all humans
desires and actions aim to achieve.
Four Cardinal Virtues
1. Prudence
Prudence is the virtue that disposes practical
reason to discern our true good in every
circumstance and to choose the right means of
achieving it; "the prudent man looks where he is
going."
Four Cardinal Virtues
2. Justice
Justice is the moral virtue that consists in
the constant and firm will to give their due to
God and neighbor.
Four Cardinal Virtues
3. Fortitude
Fortitude is the moral virtue that ensures
firmness in difficulties and constancy in the pursuit
of the good. It strengthens the resolve to resist
temptations and to overcome obstacles in the moral
life.
Four Cardinal Virtues
4. Temperance
Temperance is the moral virtue that
moderates the attraction of pleasures and
provides balance in the use of created goods.
The Two Contradictory
Principles
1. Man believes that there are certain things that
he should not do to anyone.
2. Man believes that values are subjective and
incapable of being disputed.
Divisions of Philosophy
1. Theoretical Philosophy – studies the truth to
be known, e.g., God, immortality of the soul,
origin of the universe.
2. Practical Philosophy – studies truths to be
acted upon, e.g., ethics, axiology, semantics,
Ethics and Morality
• Morality - refers to the quality of goodness or
badness in a human act. Good is described as
moral and bad as immoral. It means conformity to
the rules of right conduct.
• Ethics - refer to the formal study of those
standards and conduct. It is also often called
Ethics as a Normative
Science
Ethics is considered a Normative Science because it
is concerned with the systematic study of the norms of
human conduct, as distinguished from formal sciences
such as Mathematics, chemistry physics etc. Ethics is a
normative science because it involves a systematic
search for moral principles and norms that are justify our
Ethical Relativism
Ethical relativism claims that when any two
cultures or any people hold different moral values of
an action, both can be right. An action may be right
for one person or society and the same action taken
in the same way may be wrong for another reason,
and yet, both persons are equally correct.
Approaches to
Moral
Differences
There is no Moral Truth
There is no ultimate right or wrong. Moral
views differ from one person to another. This
results to a subjective morality, in which case,
what is good for one person may be bad for
another.
There is no Universal
Truth
Each culture has its own set of rules that are valid
for that culture, and we have no right to interfere, just
as they have no right to interfere with our rules. This
ethical paradigm maintains that there are moral truths
that exist, but these truths are relative and dependent
on cultures and beliefs of people.
Deep down, we can find
basic Moral Truth
Despite differences, people of different
cultures can still agree on a certain moral basics.
There is some common ground on basic moral
principles. This is called “Soft Universalism”
There is one Universal
Moral Truth
This view is also known as hard universalism or moral
absolutism. This moral paradigm maintains that there is
only one universal moral code that everybody must follow.
Because this moral code is universal and objective, moral
problems, and moral conflicts can be solved through proper
moral reasoning.
DEONTOLOGICAL VS.
TELEOLOGICAL
APPROACHES TO
ETHICAL EVALUATION
OF THE HUMAN
CONDUCT
Deontological Ethics
It is also known as non-consequentialist approach
is a body of ethical theories that measures and
evaluates the nature of a moral act based on the
validity of the motive of an act. This means that if the
motive or intention of the act is good, then regardless
of the consequences, the whole action is good.
Teleological Ethics
It came from the Greek word “tele” which means
far or remote. It is also known as consequentialist
theory measures the morality of an action based on its
consequences and not on the motive or intention of the
actor. If the consequence is good, regardless of what
motive is, the act is always morally good.
Immanuel Kant’s
Deontological Ethics
A human act must be founded on
reason. He emphasizes the difference
between acting out of moral duty and
acting in conformity with a moral duty.
MORAL SENSE
IN US
Moral Sense
The main difference between man and
animal is that man has a moral perception.
Man has a natural insight to morality, this
being a gift of the Creator who gave man a
“Moral Sense.”
“What is important here is the
acceptance that the decision is never
completed, or done with, when a certain
course of action has been chosen. A decision
is always something that has to be pondered
over time. It challenges us to an ongoing
process of questioning, wondering whether
THANK
YOU