0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views27 pages

DR-Lab 07b

The document discusses the creation and quality control of digital radiography (DR) images, highlighting the importance of correcting non-uniformities and addressing issues like lag and ghosting. It outlines the technology behind direct and indirect capture systems, as well as the need for periodic corrections to maintain image quality. Additionally, it emphasizes the impact of image composition on digital processing outcomes and the challenges associated with gonadal shielding in DR systems.

Uploaded by

srinibme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
33 views27 pages

DR-Lab 07b

The document discusses the creation and quality control of digital radiography (DR) images, highlighting the importance of correcting non-uniformities and addressing issues like lag and ghosting. It outlines the technology behind direct and indirect capture systems, as well as the need for periodic corrections to maintain image quality. Additionally, it emphasizes the impact of image composition on digital processing outcomes and the challenges associated with gonadal shielding in DR systems.

Uploaded by

srinibme
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

Radiation Protection in Digital

Radiology
Avoiding Artefacts in Digital
Radiography
L07

IAEA
International Atomic Energy Agency
Educational Objectives

• Explain how the DR image is created.


• Explain how errors in the process can
produce sub-standard images
• Explain about the artefacts in DR

IAEA 2
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Method III: “Direct” capture:
includes both Indirect DR and Direct
DR
• X-ray-to-light Converters with photodetector
• Fluorescent material such as Gd2O2S:Tb
(gadolinum oxysulfide doped with terbium), CsI:Tl
(cesium iodide doped with thallium), with good x-
ray stopping power
• Also Scintillating Fiber Optics (SFO) as converter
• Photodetector (A Si) relatively transparent to x-
rays
• Direct X-ray Conversion (photoconductor)
• PbI2, HgI2, ZnCeTe (zinc cerium telluride), CdZnTe
(cadmium zinc telluride) with high Z
• Thick layer of a-Se (amorphous selenium)

IAEA 3
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Digital signal production

• Fluorescent screen with video camera (video-


fluoroscopy, image intensifiers)
• Fluorescent screen with Charged-Coupled Devices
(CCD) or Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor
(CMOS) array
• Optical lens coupling
• Secondary quantum sink
• Fiber optic coupling
• Small area
• Hydrogenated Amorphous Silicon (a-Si:H) with Thin Film
“Flat panels”

Transistors (TFT)
• alternative = switching diode
• requires x-ray converter
• Amorphous Selenium (a-Se) electronically coupled to
TFT

IAEA 4
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Both Indirect and Direct Flat panel
Detectors depend on Thin Film Transistor
(TFT) arrays
Indirect Direct

IAEA 5
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Two approaches for making the
projection

• Large Area detector


• Entire image
captured at once
• Synchronous
scanning mechanism
• Collimated x-ray
beam and linear
detector array scan
anatomy
Courtesy JA Seibert, UC-Davis
IAEA 6
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Characteristics of “Direct” capture
systems
+ Rapid acquisition and processing
+ Typically integrated with x-ray
generator
+ No mechanical scan mechanism
— High initial capital investment
— Challenging manufacturing
processes
— Limited systems for bedside
radiography
? Brief history of clinical operation
? Life cycle issues unknown
(durability?)
? Image rendering unknown
? Exposure factor issues

IAEA Courtesy JA Seibert, UC-Davis 7


Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Non-invasive kVp measurement of a
DR system

Sensors in beam No sensors in beam …

Lesson: Tests that involve production of large amounts of radiation requ


protection of the image receptor.

IAEA 8
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
What was the previous view
acquired?

• All DR systems are


subject to
“ghosting” and/or
“lag”
• Lag is effective
increase in dark
current (offset)
• Ghosting is a
change in detector
sensitivity (gain)
• a-Se = reduction
• CsI(Tl), a-Si:H =
increase

IAEA 9
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Uncorrected DR image is inherently
non-uniform

IAEA 10
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Non-uniformities are corrected by
“flat-fielding”

IAEA 11
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Chest image from
a flat panel
obtained at 75 kV
(mistake, using
abdomen
protocol). More
entrance dose and
slight saturation

IAEA 12
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Chest image from a
flat panel obtained
at 75 kV (mistake,
using abdomen
protocol).
More entrance dose
and slight
saturation

IAEA 13
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Audit chest bad positioning. Time of first image: 16:29:36. Dose 0.13 mGy

IAEA 14
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Audit chest bad positioning. Time of first image: 16:29:36. Dose 0.13 mGy

IAEA 15
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Audit chest bad positioning. Time of acquisition: 16:30:1; Accepted ..
enough information with both images but two exposures!!

IAEA 16
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Second image (red box) … bad positioning! … Dose 0.206 mGy!!.
Probably, one of the chambers of the AEC was in the mediastinum

IAEA 17
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Raw vs. Corrected DR Image

Bushberg, Seibert, Leidholdt, Boone The Essential


IAEA Physics of Medical Imaging 2nd Ed
18
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Artifacts related to gain and offset
correction
GE DR Canon DR

Willis CE et al. Appl Radiol. 11-20, 2004


IAEA 19
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Composition of image affects
display processing

Default Reprocessed

IAEA 20
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Gonadal shielding has drawbacks
• Ovary locations vary
• Shield may obscure clinical features
• Shield may interfere with automatic image
processing

Processed Unprocessed

IAEA 21
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Large patient – covers entire
detector

(if there’s no contrast in the raw image,


there’s not much image processing can do

IAEA 22
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Was there a clinical necessity for
this “appliance”?

Would this have been


any less of an error
with conventional
screen-film?

IAEA 23
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Summary

• DR systems are inherently non-uniform


in two dimensions
• Proper correction of non-uniformity is
critical to DR image quality
• Periodic correction is necessary
• DR systems are subject to lag and
ghosting
• The composition of the DR image affects
the outcome of digital image processing
IAEA 24
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Answer True or False

• DR systems are subject to ghosting or


lag

IAEA 25
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
Answer True or False

• True. In DR systems, lag is the


effective increase in dark current and
ghosting is the change in detector
sensitivity.

IAEA 26
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography
References
• Kabir, M. Z., Yunus, M., Kasap, S. O. (2004) Dependence of x-ray
sensitivity of direct conversion x-ray detectors on x-ray exposure and
exposure history, Proc SPIE, 2004; 5368, 170-176.
• Willis CE, Thompson SK and Shepard SJ. Artifacts and Misadventures
in Digital Radiography. Applied Radiology 33(1):11-20, January 2004.
• Zhao, W., DeCrescenzo, G., Rowlands, J. A. Investigation of lag and
ghosting in amorphous selenium flat-panel x-ray detectors. Proc SPIE,
2002; 4682, 9-20.
• Overdick, M., Solf, T., Wischmann, H. Temporal Artefacts in Flat
Dynamic X-ray Detectors. Proc SPIE, 2001; 4320, 47-58.
• Siewerdsen, J. H., Jaffray, D. A. A ghost story: Spatio-temporal
response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.
Medical Physics, 1999; 26, 1624-1641.
• Seibert JA, Boone JM, Lindfors KK. Flat-field correction technique for
digital detectors. Proc. SPIE, 1998; 3336, 348-354.
• Bushberg JT, Seibert JA, Leidholdt Em and Boone JM. The essential
Physics of Medical Imaging, 2nd Edn Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
2002

IAEA 27
Radiation Protection in Digital Radiology L07 Avoiding Artefacts in Digital Radiography

You might also like