Wireless Networking
Why Wireless?
Advantages
– Mobility (on the go)
– Flexibility (any place, any time, temporary, permanent)
– No problems with wiring (e.g. historical buildings, fire protection,
esthetics), also cost reducing
– Robust against disasters like earthquake, fire; in emergency situations
It has really been a wireless revolution decade…with more to come
Wireless is no longer a luxury but a necessity
Wireless Technology is everywhere
Driven by technology and vision
Wireless technologies
Device miniaturization
Mobile computing platforms
Need for ubiquitous connectivity
The field is moving fast
Image courtesy: Google
The Wireless Revolution
Cellular is the fastest growing sector of communication industry
(exponential growth since 1982, with over 2.5 billion users
worldwide today)
– Wireless mobile services grew from 11 million subscribers worldwide in
1990 to over 2 billion in 2005
– In the same period, the Internet grew from being a curious academic tool to
about 1 billion users
Estimated Global Subscribers mid 2006
2500
2200
2000
[subs x000,000]
1500
1023
1000
500
250
0
Internet Cell Phones Broadband
WLAN Market: WiFi
Forecast Sales of Wi-Fi Equipment Worldwide WLAN Infrastructure
(Source: InfoTech Trends) Shipments (Source: Gartner)
5
Millions of Units
4
6
5
3
$-bil
2 3
2
1 1
0
0
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
WLAN growing exponentially
Today, NY city is totally
covered by Wi-Fi hotspots
Source: Pyramid Research
Source: AirTight Networks
Today, Variety of Wireless-Capable Devices
But how did it all get started?
Image courtesy: Google
An overview of Wireless Networks
Wireless History
•1895: Marconi demonstrated the first radio based wireless transmission
•1901: First radio reception across the Atlantic Ocean
•1924: First Mobile Radio Telephone
Image courtesy: Google
Early Cellular Systems
1940s-50s: cellular concept discovered
1946: First Mobile Telephone System (MTS) introduced in 25 cities in
USA
Half-duplex
Everything was “manual” in MTS
Maximum 3 calls supported!!!
Huge Mobile transceivers
1960: Improved MTS (IMTS)
Automatic call switching and full duplex
Supported 23 channels
MTS & IMTS used high power BS and used the spectrum inefficiently
Image courtesy: Google
Early Cellular Systems (contd.)
Post-1960: High power BS replaced by low-power low
coverage stations
1st Generation (1G): Analog Systems
– Designed in late 1960s but due to regulatory delays deployed in
early 1980s
– 1983: The first analog cellular system deployed in Chicago:
Advanced Mobile Phone System (AMPS), saturated by 1984
2nd generation (2G): Digital Systems: early 90s
– Represent voice signal digitally
– Higher capacity
– Higher speed
– Reduced cost and power efficiency of digital hardware
– Encryption
Early Cellular Systems (contd.)
A number of 2G systems became very popular…
Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) became famous
in Europe and partly in USA
– Operating around 900 MHz and also in 1800 MHz
– Primarily for voice
– GSM defines number of frequency channels, divided into uplink and downlink, in
turn divided into timeslots
– We will study GSM in detail later in this class…
High Speed Circuit Switched Data (HSCSD) and General Packet
Radio Service (GPRS)
– Extension of GSM: Primarily for data applications
– GPRS is packet switched while GSM and HSCSD are circuit switched network
– *** What is circuit switching and packet switching? ***
Circuit Switching
End-end resources
reserved for “call”
– dedicated bandwidth
resources: no sharing
– circuit-like (guaranteed)
performance
– call setup required
Packet Switching
A C
1.5 Mb/s
B
queue of packets
waiting for output
link
D E
each end-end data stream divided into packets
user A, B packets share network resources
each packet uses full link bandwidth
resources used as needed
Wireless Data Systems
Characteristics of data systems are different from voice systems
– Data systems are characterized by bursty transmissions
– Unless there is a packet to transmit, terminals remain idle
– Appropriate for packet switching and sharing the resources among multiple users
ALOHANET developed at University of Hawaii, first wireless data systems, 1971
Wireless data systems revolutionized by Wireless LAN
– Commenced in the late 1980s
– Driven by FCC’s decision to authorize license-free bands
– Provide high speed data within a relatively small region
– IEEE standard 802.11
– Will study IEEE 802.11 system in detail
A wide variety of wireless data systems now exist – can be categorized based on
coverage area
IEEE Wireless Standards
RAN
IEEE 802.22
WAN
IEEE 802.20
IEEE 802.16e
MAN
IEEE 802.16d
WiMAX
LAN
IEEE 802.11
Wi-Fi
IEEE 802.15 PAN
Bluetooth
Image courtesy: Google
Wireless LANs: WiFi/802.11
Based on the IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n family of standards
Designed to provide in-building or campus broadband coverage.
– IEEE 802.11b peak physical layer data rate of 11 Mbps
– IEEE 802.11a/g peak physical layer data rate of 54 Mbps and
indoor coverage over a distance of 100 feet.
Much higher peak data rates than 3G systems, primarily since it
operates over a larger bandwidth (20 MHz).
– Its MAC scheme CSMA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access) is
inefficient for large numbers of users
– The interference constraints of operating in the license-exempt
band is likely to significantly reduce the actual capacity of
outdoor Wi-Fi systems.
– Wi-Fi systems are not designed to support high-speed mobility
WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network)
Cable replacement RF technology (low cost)
Short range {10m (1mW), 100m (100 mW)}
– Lower power than WiFi
Widely supported by telecommunications, PC,
and consumer electronics companies.
– Hands free phone (ear set) for cars, internet
chat/VoIP
– Intra-car networking announced by some
car manufacturers in Europe
IEEE 802.15 includes seven task groups…
– Numbered from 1 – 7 with each of them having own
responsibility
Image courtesy: Google
WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network)
IEEE 802.15.1
– WPAN/Bluetooth standard: includes MAC and PHY spec.
IEEE 802.15.2
– Addresses the issue of coexistence of WPAN with other wireless devices such as
WLAN
IEEE 802.15.3
– MAC and PHY standard for high rate WPANs
IEEE 802.15.4
– MAC and PHY standard for low rate but high endurance (power-aware)
IEEE 802.15.5
– Mesh networking standards for WPAN devices
IEEE 802.15.6
– Body area network standard (low power, low frequency), can be helpful in health
monitoring
IEEE 802.15.7
– Very recently started..still working
– PHY and MAC standard for visible light communications
WiMAX: worldwide interoperability of microwave access
2 . 16 -2004
80
WiFi
WiFi
Urban WiFi
DSL/T1
04
Replacemen 802
80 200
2.16-20
WiFi WiFi
t
WiFi
-2 004 802
.16e
0 2.1 6
WiFi 8
Rural
802
Rural .16e
Rural Rural
Broadband
Image courtesy: Google
WiMAX Fixed and Mobile
WiMAX Fixed / Nomadic WiMAX Mobile
– 802.16d or 802.16-2004 – 802.16e
– Usage: Backhaul, Wireless DSL – Usage: Long-distance mobile
– Devices: outdoor and indoor wireless broadband
installed CPE – Devices: PC Cards, Notebooks
– Frequencies: 2.5GHz, 3.5GHz and future handsets
and 5.8GHz (Licensed and LE) – Frequencies: 2.5GHz
– Description: wireless connections – Description: Wireless connections
to homes, businesses, and other to laptops, PDAs and handsets
WiMAX or cellular network towers when outside of Wi-Fi hotspot
coverage
Image courtesy: Google
Wide Area: Satellite Systems
Cover very large areas
Different orbit heights
– Low Earth Orbit (LEO): ~1000 miles
– Mid Earth Orbit (MEO): ~6000 miles
– Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO): ~22,300 miles
Optimized for one-way transmission
location positioning, GPS systems, Satellite Radio
Most two-way systems struggling or bankrupt
Ad hoc Networks
All the wireless networks mentioned so far are known as
infrastructure network
– Require initial setup
– Radios mostly follow master/slave concept
– Base stations act as master while user devices are controlled by BS
Infrastructure networks are not appropriate in
– emergency situations like natural disasters or
– military conflicts or
– in areas where access is difficult
Ad hoc networks are particularly suitable in such scenarios
– Decentralized
– Peer-to-peer
– Does not depend on a central entity
– Minimal configuration and quick deployment
Ad-Hoc/Mesh Networks
Wireless Ad hoc networks
1. Mobile ad hoc networks
2. Wireless mesh networks
3. Wireless sensor networks
Wireless mesh network
Mobile ad hoc network
Image courtesy: Google
Wireless Sensor Networks
• Particularly useful for sensing and Event detection
• Battlefield surveillance
• Security surveillance
• Sensor Nodes
• Low power, Small size
Image courtesy: Google
Wireless Sensor Network
Classification
Infrastructured
•In buildings
• Secured places
Infrastructure-less
•No human intervention
• Not replaceable
• One time deployment
• Finite energy available with sensor
nodes
Image courtesy: Google
Wireless
Technical Challenges & Basic Concepts
Challenge 1: Unreliable and Unpredictable Wireless Coverage
Wireless channel “feels” very different from a wired channel.
– Wireless links are not reliable: they may vary over time and space
– Noise adds on to the signal
– Signal strength falls off rapidly with distance
– Signal strength may weaken due to obstacles
– Medium “air” shared among many users
Results:
– Capacity is shared with others
– Variable capacity
– Unreliable channel: errors, outages
– Variable delays
Challenge 2: “Open” Wireless Medium
Wireless interference
S1 R1
S2 R1
Challenge 2: “Open” Wireless Medium
Wireless interference
S1 R1
S2 R1
Hidden terminals
S1 R1 S2
Challenge 2: “Open” Wireless Medium
Wireless interference
S1 R1
S2 R1
Hidden terminals
S1 R1 S2
Exposed terminal
R1 S1 S2 R2
Challenge 2: Open Wireless Medium
Wireless security
– eavesdropping
– jamming
– denial of service
– and many more…
Challenge 3: Mobility
Mobility causes poor-quality wireless links
Mobility causes intermittent connection
– under intermittent connected networks, traditional routing,
TCP, applications all break
Mobility changes context, e.g., location
Challenge 4: Portability: Energy-Constrained Nodes
Limited battery power
Limited processing, display and storage
Each node can only send a finite number of bits.
– Transmit energy minimized by maximizing bit time
– Introduces a delay versus energy tradeoff for each bit
Short-range networks must consider transmit and
processing energy
– Sophisticated techniques not necessarily energy-efficient
– Sleep modes save energy but complicate networking
Changes everything about the network design:
– Delay vs. throughput vs. node/network lifetime tradeoffs.
– Optimization of node cooperation.
Challenge 5: Crowded Spectrum: FCC Chart
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/osmhome/allochrt.pdf
The field is challenging
With new wireless technologies and with more
sophistication, there are additional challenges…
– Operational
– Security
– Efficiency and more
This course is all about
– learning current and new wireless technologies
– Understanding the challenges
– Design + Implement new mechanisms to counteract
against the challenges and make wireless networking
more efficient