Skip to main content
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

Physics > Physics Education

arXiv:2406.14685 (physics)
[Submitted on 20 Jun 2024 (v1), last revised 23 Oct 2024 (this version, v2)]

Title:Evaluating vision-capable chatbots in interpreting kinematics graphs: a comparative study of free and subscription-based models

Authors:Giulia Polverini, Bor Gregorcic
View PDF
Abstract:This study investigates the performance of eight large multimodal model (LMM)-based chatbots on the Test of Understanding Graphs in Kinematics (TUG-K), a research-based concept inventory. Graphs are a widely used representation in STEM and medical fields, making them a relevant topic for exploring LMM-based chatbots' visual interpretation abilities. We evaluated both freely available chatbots (Gemini 1.0 Pro, Claude 3 Sonnet, Microsoft Copilot, and ChatGPT-4o) and subscription-based ones (Gemini 1.0 Ultra, Gemini 1.5 Pro API, Claude 3 Opus, and ChatGPT-4). We found that OpenAI's chatbots outperform all the others, with ChatGPT-4o showing the overall best performance. Contrary to expectations, we found no notable differences in the overall performance between freely available and subscription-based versions of Gemini and Claude 3 chatbots, with the exception of Gemini 1.5 Pro, available via API. In addition, we found that tasks relying more heavily on linguistic input were generally easier for chatbots than those requiring visual interpretation. The study provides a basis for considerations of LMM-based chatbot applications in STEM and medical education, and suggests directions for future research.
Subjects: Physics Education (physics.ed-ph)
Cite as: arXiv:2406.14685 [physics.ed-ph]
  (or arXiv:2406.14685v2 [physics.ed-ph] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.14685
Related DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1452414

Submission history

From: Giulia Polverini [view email]
[v1] Thu, 20 Jun 2024 19:17:59 UTC (4,542 KB)
[v2] Wed, 23 Oct 2024 07:41:07 UTC (1,478 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

  • View PDF
  • Other Formats
license icon view license
Current browse context:
physics.ed-ph
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2024-06
Change to browse by:
physics

References & Citations

export BibTeX citation

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)