Skip to main content
Cornell University
We gratefully acknowledge support from the Simons Foundation, member institutions, and all contributors. Donate
arxiv logo > cs > arXiv:2304.13911

Help | Advanced Search

arXiv logo
Cornell University Logo

quick links

  • Login
  • Help Pages
  • About

Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence

arXiv:2304.13911 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Apr 2023 (v1), last revised 30 Jun 2023 (this version, v2)]

Title:Federated Prompting and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Improving LLMs Answering

Authors:Xiangyang Liu, Tianqi Pang, Chenyou Fan
View a PDF of the paper titled Federated Prompting and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Improving LLMs Answering, by Xiangyang Liu and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We investigate how to enhance answer precision in frequently asked questions posed by distributed users using cloud-based Large Language Models (LLMs). Our study focuses on a typical situations where users ask similar queries that involve identical mathematical reasoning steps and problem-solving procedures. Due to the unsatisfactory accuracy of LLMs' zero-shot prompting with standalone questions, we propose to improve the distributed synonymous questions using Self-Consistency (SC) and Chain-of-Thought (CoT) techniques. Specifically, we first retrieve synonymous questions from a crowd-sourced database and create a federated question pool. We call these federated synonymous questions with the same or different parameters SP-questions or DP-questions, respectively. We refer to our methods as Fed-SP-SC and Fed-DP-CoT, which can generate significantly more accurate answers for all user queries without requiring sophisticated model-tuning. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our proposed methods can significantly enhance question accuracy by fully exploring the synonymous nature of the questions and the consistency of the answers.
Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2304.13911 [cs.AI]
  (or arXiv:2304.13911v2 [cs.AI] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.13911
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xiangyang Liu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 27 Apr 2023 01:48:03 UTC (1,248 KB)
[v2] Fri, 30 Jun 2023 13:21:36 UTC (1,249 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Federated Prompting and Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Improving LLMs Answering, by Xiangyang Liu and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source
  • Other Formats
view license
Current browse context:
cs.AI
< prev   |   next >
new | recent | 2023-04
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

  • NASA ADS
  • Google Scholar
  • Semantic Scholar
a export BibTeX citation Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

×
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy logo Reddit logo

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
Papers with Code (What is Papers with Code?)
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)

Demos

Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)

Recommenders and Search Tools

Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
  • Author
  • Venue
  • Institution
  • Topic

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax (What is MathJax?)
  • About
  • Help
  • contact arXivClick here to contact arXiv Contact
  • subscribe to arXiv mailingsClick here to subscribe Subscribe
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • Web Accessibility Assistance
  • arXiv Operational Status
    Get status notifications via email or slack