Niru Tyagi

🔴 SOP Not Followed = Risk Accepted Whenever I sit through an investigation, one point keeps surfacing again and again: “The SOP was there—but it was not followed.” This is more than a procedural lapse. It’s a behavioral issue—a mindset problem. Let’s be clear—not following a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is not a small miss. It’s a deliberate or unconscious act of stepping away from safety. In many cases, it’s nothing less than a violation of Life Saving Rules. Why does this happen? - Overconfidence: “I’ve done this job a hundred times.” - Pressure: “I need to finish this fast.” - Habit, poor supervision, or lack of consequences. But whatever the reason, bypassing an SOP means bypassing a control designed to protect life. It’s time we acknowledge this for what it is—not just a mistake, but a behavioral deviation that puts lives at risk. The culture of "chalta hai" or "adjust kar lenge" has no place in high-risk operations. We must build a culture where: - SOP adherence is non-negotiable - People understand the “why” behind every step - Leadership, training, and supervision reinforce the message daily Following an SOP is not box-ticking—it’s a way of respecting life. It honors the hard lessons learned from past incidents and safeguards our future. Let’s make SOP adherence a matter of pride, ownership, and discipline. That’s how we build a true safety culture—one behavior at a time. #SafetyCulture #SOP #LifeSavingRules #Leadership #BehaviorBasedSafety #ZeroHarm #SafetyFirst #HighRiskWork

464

77 Comments

Romance in the Workplace: An Overlooked Safety Concern? Workplace romance may sound harmless - two adults forming a connection while spending long hours together. But have we ever paused to consider its implications from a HSE perspective? I know this post may appear funny or out of place, but I want you to think about the impact of the following on workplace safety: 1) Emotional Distractions - A budding (or failing) relationship can lead to lapses in concentration. In high-risk environments like construction sites, transport depots, or workshops, even a brief distraction can result in serious incidents. 2) Workplace Conflicts - When relationships go bad, personal conflicts may escalate into harassment claims, emotional distress, or even physical altercations - thus introducing psychosocial hazards that HSE professionals have a responsibility to address. 3) Power Dynamics - Romantic relationships between supervisors and subordinates create ethical dilemmas and can foster an unsafe work culture where decisions seem biased or staff feel pressured. As HSE leaders, we must recognize that psychosocial risks are as real as physical ones. This means: - Including workplace relationships in risk assessments. - Collaborating with HR to develop clear policies on workplace conduct. - Providing training on maintaining professional boundaries. - Offering support systems for employees navigating emotional stress. Romance may be personal, but its impact can be organisational. For a truly safe workplace, we must look beyond hard hats and harnesses to the hidden risks in human interactions. #HSE #WorkplaceSafety #Leadership #SafetyCulture

96

44 Comments

I often share general advice on LinkedIn to support HSEQ professionals—and I’ve noticed how quickly even the simplest posts can sometimes spark combative responses. Healthy debate is valuable, but it’s worth keeping a few things in mind: 🔹 Know your audience. If you’re job-seeking, your comments shape your personal brand. Before you hit “post,” ask: Does this add value? 🔹 Contribute, don’t just react. Insights, experiences, and perspectives elevate the conversation. A personal opinion without context can do the opposite. 🔹 Be intentional. Everyone has the right to share their views. The real question is: Will this strengthen my professional credibility—or detract from it? LinkedIn is a powerful platform for learning, building networks, and showcasing expertise. The way you engage can make all the difference in how you’re seen. #CareerAdvice #LinkedInTips #ProfessionalBrand

40

A robust national occupational health and safety law is built upon the three interdependent pillars of Governance, Protection of Workers, and Capacity. Governance establishes the essential legal framework, defining clear roles for government, employers, and workers and mandating tripartite consultation for policy development. Protection of Workers forms the core of the law, establishing a safe work environment as a fundamental right, prioritising preventative measures like risk assessment over reactive ones, and empowering workers with rights such as the ability to refuse unsafe work. Finally, Capacity ensures the law's effective implementation through a well-resourced labour inspectorate, the provision of occupational health services, mandatory training, and robust data collection systems. Supported by international principles from organizations like the ILO, these three pillars work in unison to create a comprehensive, proactive system that fosters a national culture of safety and ensures decent work for all.

44

2 Comments

🔷 The Safety Paradox If safety could be contained, the answers would be simple: -Hazardous energy -Foreseeable risks -Leadership, and resources. -Clarity. Solvability. Accountability. 🔹But Containment Leaks. -People bring fatigue, distraction, stress, and fragile norms into work. -A welder on hour 14 worried about paying the rent won’t follow the perfect lockout procedure. -Society itself now treats discomfort as harm. Safety can’t be ring-fenced from those pressures. 🔹The Problem with Safety Science Safety science has tried to compensate by expansion borrowing from pop psychology, prevailing culture, new paradigms, and complexity language. It sounds progressive, but it rarely touches the causal factors that kill. We debate “emergence” and “deployed autonomy” while workers make up lockout sequences with no documented procedure. The focus drifts, and clarity is lost. And look at the pattern in fatal cases: -Basics ignored.  -Hazards obvious.  -Fixes simple.  -Leadership tolerating shortcuts until death forces change. Then the familiar corporate statements: “deeply sorry,” “profound effect,” “significant improvements since.” 🔹Improvement by Obituary This is the paradox: 👉 Containment fails in reality.  👉 Expansion fails in strategy. And in the middle lie the real causes, not hidden in theory, but in plain sight, waiting to be acted on. The broken valve that would cost £50 to fix. The isolation procedure that nobody wrote down. The valve everyone knew was leaking. 🔹The Problem Exposed: Too much of safety science: 👉 Builds models, frameworks, and language to help people TALK about safety, NOT DO IT - and it keeps doing so because the incentives reward words over actions: -Careers advance on books and conference keynotes, not repaired guards.  -Culture flatters narratives that sound progressive.  -Abstractions disperse accountability. And soft language sells better to boardroom than hard truths: “Your cost cutting killed someone.” And another fact - after decades of complexity theory, its advocates still can’t name one instance where it prevented harm BEFORE the event. But they have field guides and plenty of courses running. Meanwhile, workers die because nobody documented which valve was faulty. That’s not complexity. That’s negligence dressed up as philosophy. And of course the social media echo chamber latches onto the talk science, spreads it as gospel, and academia gives it cover. The cycle repeats, the basics stay broken, and fatalities plateau - SIFs get ignored. 🔹The Basic Win: The solution isn’t more theory. It’s knowing where to be tight (lockout procedures, confined space entry, isolation sequences) and where to be loose (problem-solving, adaptation within safe boundaries). But that requires something our industry struggles with: 👉 The courage to name problems clearly and FIX them simply, even when there’s no consulting package or book to sell...​​​​​​​​​​​​​ #Safetyscience

124

199 Comments

The Importance of the Buddy System in Workplace Safety: The buddy system is a safety strategy where two individuals are paired together to monitor and support each other while performing tasks—particularly in environments that involve potential risks or hazards. This simple yet effective approach enhances overall safety, boosts communication, and ensures that help is readily available in case of emergencies. --->Key Benefits of the Buddy System 1. Immediate Emergency Response: One of the most critical advantages of the buddy system is the ability to respond rapidly during emergencies. If one person is injured, falls ill, or becomes incapacitated, the buddy can quickly assess the situation, call for help, or administer first aid. This reduces response times and can significantly improve outcomes in critical situations. 2. Enhanced Hazard Awareness: Two people working together are more likely to notice safety hazards or unsafe conditions. A buddy may spot something that the other misses—such as faulty equipment, leaks, or procedural errors—thereby preventing accidents before they occur. This collaborative awareness strengthens the overall safety culture of the workplace. 3. Mutual Support and Accountability: Buddies support each other not only physically but also mentally and emotionally. This creates a sense of responsibility and accountability, where each person feels more obligated to follow safety procedures and report unsafe behavior. It also helps reduce complacency and encourages adherence to proper protocols. 4. Deterrent to Unsafe Practices: When individuals work in pairs, they are less likely to take shortcuts or engage in risky behaviors, knowing that someone is observing and depending on them. This deterrent effect promotes a safer, more disciplined working environment. 5. No One Left Alone in Dangerous Situations: The buddy system ensures that no individual is left to face dangerous or high-risk tasks alone. This is especially important in environments such as construction sites, laboratories, confined spaces, remote areas, and during night shifts where risks may be heightened. ---> Practical Applications in the Workplace *Construction and Industrial Sites – Where machinery, heights, and heavy materials pose risks. *Laboratories and Chemical Handling – Where exposure to hazardous substances is a concern. *Confined Space Entry – Where rescue may be difficult without assistance. *Remote Work Locations – Where access to medical or emergency services is limited. *Emergency Evacuations – Ensuring everyone is accounted for and assisted if needed. *Training and Orientation for New Workers – Helping them learn safety protocols under supervision. --->Best Practices for Implementing a Buddy System *Pair Competently: Match buddies with consideration for skill level, experience, and communication abilities. *Set Clear Roles: Each buddy should understand their responsibilities during normal operations and emergencies.

459

4 Comments