From: "jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans) via ruby-core" Date: 2023-05-30T22:55:55+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:113711] [Ruby master Misc#19684] DevMeeting-2023-06-08 Issue #19684 has been updated by jeremyevans0 (Jeremy Evans). * [Bug #11704] Refinements only get "used" once in loop (jeremyevans0) * Is it expected that if a refinement is activated for a block, it remains activated if the block is re-entered? * This is how CRuby works, but may be confusing to users expecting more dynamic behavior. * This would seem difficult to change in CRuby, though JRuby (and maybe TruffleRuby) already operates the more dynamic way. * [Bug #18622] const_get still looks in Object, while lexical constant lookup no longer does (jeremyevans0) * Should we change Module#const_get to raise NameError instead of looking into Object, for modules and subclasses of Object? * If so, should we deprecate the behavior in Ruby 3.3 and change the behavior in Ruby 3.4? * [Bug #15428] Refactor Proc#>> and #<< (jeremyevans0) * Last discussed at August 2021 developer meeting, no decision made. * Calling `to_proc` if the passed object does not respond to `call` should be backwards compatible. * Do we want to change the behavior of Proc#>> and Proc#<< to encourage their usage with symbols? * Alternatively, should Proc#>> and Proc#<< raise error if called with argument not supporting #call (to avoid NoMethodError later when you call the resulting Proc)? ---------------------------------------- Misc #19684: DevMeeting-2023-06-08 https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/19684#change-103362 * Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh) * Status: Open * Priority: Normal ---------------------------------------- # The next dev meeting **Date: 2023/06/08 13:00-17:00** (JST) Log: *TBD* - Dev meeting *IS NOT* a decision-making place. All decisions should be done at the bug tracker. - Dev meeting is a place we can ask Matz, nobu, nurse and other developers directly. - Matz is a very busy person. Take this opportunity to ask him. If you can not attend, other attendees can ask instead of you (if attendees can understand your issue). - We will write a record of the discussion in the file or to each ticket in English. - All activities are best-effort (keep in mind that most of us are volunteer developers). - The date, time and place of the meeting are scheduled according to when/where we can reserve Matz's time. - *DO NOT* discuss then on this ticket, please. # Call for agenda items If you have a ticket that you want matz and committers to discuss, please post it into this ticket in the following format: ``` * [Ticket ref] Ticket title (your name) * Comment (A summary of the ticket, why you put this ticket here, what point should be discussed, etc.) ``` Example: ``` * [Feature #14609] `Kernel#p` without args shows the receiver (ko1) * I feel this feature is very useful and some people say :+1: so let discuss this feature. ``` - It is recommended to add a comment by 2023/06/05. We hold a preparatory meeting to create an agenda a few days before the dev-meeting. - The format is strict. We'll use [this script to automatically create an markdown-style agenda](https://gist.github.com/mame/b0390509ce1491b43610b9ebb665eb86). We may ignore a comment that does not follow the format. - Your comment is mandatory. We cannot read all discussion of the ticket in a limited time. We appreciate it if you could write a short summary and update from a previous discussion. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/postorius/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/