From: "mame (Yusuke Endoh) via ruby-core" Date: 2025-04-16T01:37:00+00:00 Subject: [ruby-core:121669] [Ruby Misc#21154] Document or change Module#autoload? Issue #21154 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh). akr (Akira Tanaka) wrote in #note-28: > I think it is possible to avoid that by checking caller_locations. As for autoload with a full path, it would be easy (and that's the case for Zeitwerk, I think). In general, autoload with a relative path needs to resolve the path to absolute one. This resolution may be too costly to do for all autoload calls by default. ---------------------------------------- Misc #21154: Document or change Module#autoload? https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/21154#change-112723 * Author: fxn (Xavier Noria) * Status: Feedback * Assignee: mame (Yusuke Endoh) ---------------------------------------- The documentation of `Module#autoload?` says > Returns filename to be loaded if name is registered as autoload in the namespace of mod or one of its ancestors. Cool, but in the following snippet ```ruby autoload :Foo, 'foo' autoload?(:Foo) ``` the second line could evaluate to `nil`, and this does not seem to agree. I just registered an autoload, therefore (according to the documentation) I should get "foo" back in line 2. I'd like to ask for clarification from the Ruby team: 1. Is the documentation complete? Should that second line always return "foo"? 2. If the answer is no, which is the logic missing in the docs? Thank you! -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ ______________________________________________ ruby-core mailing list -- ruby-core@ml.ruby-lang.org To unsubscribe send an email to ruby-core-leave@ml.ruby-lang.org ruby-core info -- https://ml.ruby-lang.org/mailman3/lists/ruby-core.ml.ruby-lang.org/