From: Run Paint Run Run Date: 2009-07-07T11:54:18+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:24172] [Bug #1737] Enumerable#join: Segfault Resulting from Recent Commit Bug #1737: Enumerable#join: Segfault Resulting from Recent Commit http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1737 Author: Run Paint Run Run Status: Open, Priority: Normal Assigned to: Nobuyoshi Nakada ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-07 trunk 23976) [i686-linux] It looks like one of yesterday's commits is causing a segfault. Yesterday this code exposed bug #1731, but didn't segfault, so presumably either the fix or another commit made in the meantime is the cause. Possibly r23966? Unfortunately, I'm so far unable to reduce it to a reasonable test case that doesn't rely on mspec (http://github.com/rubyspec/mspec/tree/master). Is this enough for you to work magic, nobu? :-) If not, I'll try to untangle this from mspec tomorrow and provide a better example. $ cat /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb require 'mspec/mocks/object' class Enum include Enumerable def each yield 1 yield 2 end end Enum.new.join(mock('e')) $ ruby -v /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-07 trunk 23976) [i686-linux] /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:7: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.2dev (2009-07-07 trunk 23976) [i686-linux] -- control frame ---------- c:0007 p:---- s:0018 b:0018 l:000009 d:000017 IFUNC :require c:0006 p:0017 s:0016 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 METHOD /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:7 c:0005 p:---- s:0012 b:0012 l:000011 d:000011 FINISH c:0004 p:---- s:0010 b:0010 l:000009 d:000009 CFUNC :join c:0003 p:0052 s:0006 b:0006 l:0012b4 d:001ba4 EVAL /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:10 c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:0012b4 d:0012b4 TOP --------------------------- /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:10:in `
' /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:10:in `join' /tmp/enum_join_segfault.rb:7:in `each' -- C level backtrace information ------------------------------------------- ruby(rb_vm_bugreport+0xb5) [0x8161c15] ruby [0x819d38b] ruby(rb_bug+0x28) [0x819d418] ruby [0x80f69b5] [0xb8004410] ruby [0x810a9da] ruby(rb_str_buf_append+0x5b) [0x810aa6b] ruby [0x8199dc7] ruby [0x8151909] ruby [0x81570c7] ruby [0x8159462] ruby [0x815ba85] ruby [0x815bf8c] ruby [0x815f551] ruby(rb_iterate+0x128) [0x814dcf8] ruby(rb_block_call+0x3f) [0x814dd9f] ruby [0x8198855] ruby [0x814db4d] ruby [0x815fcbb] ruby [0x8152776] ruby [0x8159462] ruby(rb_iseq_eval_main+0x1a3) [0x81596d3] ruby(ruby_exec_node+0x97) [0x805d467] ruby(ruby_run_node+0x46) [0x805ed36] ruby(main+0x60) [0x805c860] /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xe5) [0xb7e25775] ruby [0x805c761] [NOTE] You may have encountered a bug in the Ruby interpreter or extension libraries. Bug reports are welcome. For details: http://www.ruby-lang.org/bugreport.html Aborted ---------------------------------------- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org