From: Yusuke ENDOH Date: 2010-07-14T00:31:40+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:31258] Re: [Bug #3140] gem activation has changed between 1.8 and 1.9 Hi, 2010/7/13 Yukihiro Matsumoto : > |I don't agree to see the issue as a show stopper unless some active > |developer is assigned to the issue. ?Otherwise it would take forever, > |literally. > > Now we have Evan. Thanks. Matz approved Evan as a maintainer. I think Evan should have a commit bit. After that I'll update the maintainer list. > |In practice, I think Evan's patch is a meeting point, if Roger can > |confirm the [BUG] does not occur on ruby_1_9_2 with Evan's patch. > |If it does not occur on ruby_1_9_2, I also suspect it is due to lazy > |sweep ([ruby-core:31228]). > > I think we have to separate the issue. If we don't see the problem on > 1.9.2 we can consider it being fixed. Almost all things committed to ruby_1_9_2 are backports from trunk. So I believe there is no bug that is fixed in ruby_1_9_2 but not in trunk. If the problem does not occur on 1.9.2, I bet that some bugs are committed to trunk (or that the problem is poorly-reproducible). -- Yusuke Endoh