[#36679] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4814][Open] minitest 2.2.x and test/unit do not get along — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
9 messages
2011/06/01
[#36707] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4818][Open] Add method marshalable? — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
5 messages
2011/06/03
[#36711] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4821][Open] Random Segfaults (in start_thread?) — Ivan Bortko <b2630639@...>
22 messages
2011/06/03
[#36714] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4822][Open] String#capitalize improvements — Anurag Priyam <anurag08priyam@...>
8 messages
2011/06/03
[#36720] Direct modifications to RubyGems in trunk? — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
4 messages
2011/06/03
[#36730] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824][Open] Provide method Kernel#executed? — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
56 messages
2011/06/04
[#36902] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rocky Bernstein <rocky@...>
2011/06/09
[#36935] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/06/10
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 07:20:32AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#36957] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
2011/06/11
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Cezary <[email protected]> wrote:
[#37089] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Cezary <cezary.baginski@...>
2011/06/13
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:20:31AM +0900, Rocky Bernstein wrote:
[#36732] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/04
[#36758] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
2011/06/05
[#36784] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2011/06/06
[#36833] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4824] Provide method Kernel#executed?
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/08
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
[#36741] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4828][Open] crash in test_thread_instance_variable — Motohiro KOSAKI <kosaki.motohiro@...>
8 messages
2011/06/05
[#36750] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830][Open] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
24 messages
2011/06/05
[#36907] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4830] Provide Default Variables for Array#each and other iterators
— Jan Lelis <mail@...>
2011/06/10
[#36785] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
53 messages
2011/06/06
[#36786] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Michael Edgar <adgar@...>
2011/06/06
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
[#36804] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
2011/06/06
On 07/06/2011, at 12:18 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
[#36811] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
2011/06/07
Hello,
[#36830] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4840][Open] Allow returning from require
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/08
Hi,
[#46648] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2012/07/23
[#46667] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/07/23
Em 23-07-2012 10:12, mame (Yusuke Endoh) escreveu:
[#46673] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov)" <redmine@...>
2012/07/23
[#46701] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/07/24
(2012/07/24 0:44), alexeymuranov (Alexey Muranov) wrote:
[#54874] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4840] Allow returning from require
— "nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada)" <nobu@...>
2013/05/09
[#36787] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4841][Open] WEBrick threading leads to infinite loop — Peak Xu <peak.xu+ruby@...>
8 messages
2011/06/06
[#36799] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4845][Open] Provide Class#cb_object_instantiated_from_literal(object) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
11 messages
2011/06/06
[#36834] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Charles Nutter <headius@...>
10 messages
2011/06/08
[#36860] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/08
Charles Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36875] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/09
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Eric Wong <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36878] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2011/06/09
Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36863] Object#trust vs Object#taint — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hi,
16 messages
2011/06/08
[#36866] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/06/08
Hi,
[#36873] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
2011/06/09
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 07:49:06AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#36876] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/09
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Aaron Patterson
[#36877] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/06/09
Hi,
[#36911] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/06/10
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Shugo Maeda <[email protected]> wrote:
[#36914] Re: Object#trust vs Object#taint
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/06/10
Hi,
[#36996] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4869][Open] 2206368128.chr(Encoding::UTF_8) fails strangely — Hal Brodigan <postmodern.mod3@...>
5 messages
2011/06/11
[#37071] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4877][Open] Unify Variable Expansion within Strings — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
12 messages
2011/06/12
[#37106] ruby core tutorials location — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
10 messages
2011/06/13
[#37107] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/13
> Hello all.
[#37115] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/13
> Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
[#37117] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/13
> > Rather than adding links to source code, I would prefer the wikibooks link and others under a new Tutorials section of http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ as well as adding http://ruby.runpaint.org/ to the existing Getting Started section.
[#37128] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/14
> I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connectio=
[#37137] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/06/14
> > I like what you're trying to do and see how great that tutorial connect=
[#37182] Re: ruby core tutorials location
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/06/16
> My feedback was specific to the suggestion of embedding links into the Ru=
[#37139] [Bug: ruby-1.9] test-all on without openssl system — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2011/06/14
[#37144] Ruby 1.8.6 status — Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
Hi.
6 messages
2011/06/14
[#37274] Re: Ruby 1.8.6 status
— Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
2011/06/21
[#37164] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4890][Open] Enumerable#lazy — Yutaka HARA <redmine@...>
30 messages
2011/06/16
[#42529] [ruby-trunk - Feature #4890][Assigned] Enumerable#lazy
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/02/13
[#37170] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4893][Open] Literal Instantiation breaks Object Model — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
61 messages
2011/06/16
[#37192] rb_w32_add_socket / rb_w32_remove_socket — ghazel@...
Hello,
3 messages
2011/06/17
[#37206] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4896][Open] Add newpad() support to Curses — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
6 messages
2011/06/17
[#37207] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4897][Open] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/ — Simon Baird <simon.baird@...>
43 messages
2011/06/17
[#77620] [Ruby trunk Feature#4897] Define Math::TAU and BigMath.TAU. The "true" circle constant, Tau=2*Pi. See http://tauday.com/
— nobu@...
2016/10/14
Issue #4897 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#37217] coerce — Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
Hello
8 messages
2011/06/18
[#37256] Re: coerce
— Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
2011/06/21
2011/6/18 Ond=C5=99ej B=C3=ADlka <[email protected]>:
[#37260] Re: coerce
— Ondřej Bílka <neleai@...>
2011/06/21
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 04:06:05PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:
[#37261] Re: coerce
— Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
2011/06/21
2011/6/21 Ond=C5=99ej B=C3=ADlka <[email protected]>:
[#37265] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Anthony Crognale" <anthony@...>
mget last:10 mp
3 messages
2011/06/21
[#37286] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4916][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault - dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not found: _ASN1_put_eoc — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
9 messages
2011/06/22
[#37288] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4917][Open] NilClass#to_ary — Jay Feldblum <y_feldblum@...>
8 messages
2011/06/22
[#37298] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4917][Rejected] NilClass#to_ary
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
2011/06/22
[#37289] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4918][Assigned] Make all core tests inherit from Test::Unit::TestCase — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
4 messages
2011/06/22
[#37336] I have imported Rake 0.9.2 to trunk — Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
I asked Jim if he would like me to import rake 0.9.2 to trunk, so I have.
4 messages
2011/06/23
[#37401] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3784] Seg fault in webrick — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
1 message
2011/06/26
[#37463] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4480][Assigned] Thread-local variables issue: Thread#[] returns nil when called first time — Yui NARUSE <redmine@...>
3 messages
2011/06/26
[#37546] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4934][Open] winsock listen backlog may only be set once, and is set to 5 — Greg Hazel <ghazel@...>
6 messages
2011/06/26
[#37551] [ANN] Ruby Weekly Report — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...>
Hi,
4 messages
2011/06/26
[#37576] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4938][Open] Add Random.bytes [patch] — Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core@...>
13 messages
2011/06/27
[#37588] CI? — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Is this an official CI for ruby?
7 messages
2011/06/27
[#37590] Re: CI?
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/06/27
(2011/06/28 6:28), Ryan Davis wrote:
[#37612] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4941][Open] cannot load such file -- rubygems.rb (LoadError) — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
25 messages
2011/06/28
[ruby-core:37054] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included)
From:
Yusuke ENDOH <mame@...>
Date:
2011-06-12 11:23:46 UTC
List:
ruby-core #37054
Hello, 2011/6/12 Tanaka Akira <[email protected]>: > 2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>: > >> - * Note that enumeration sequence by next_values method does not affect= other >> - * non-external enumeration methods, unless underlying iteration >> - * methods itself has side-effect, e.g. IO#each_line. >> + * Note that enumeration sequenced by +next_values+ does not affect oth= er >> + * non-external enumeration methods, unless underlying iteration method= s >> + * itself has side-effect, e.g. IO#each_line. >> >> I cannot undestand what "enumeration sequence by next_values" is. >> This is a problem of the original rdoc, not yours, though. >> It might be good to remove "enumeration sequence by". >> >> The old rdoc was written by akr. =A0Akr, what did you mean? > > For example, next_values doesn't affect Array#each as follows. Ah, I know the behavior. What I couldn't understand is just what "enumeration sequence by next_values" is. Just English problem. It is strange for me that the results returned by the method ("enumeration sequence by next_values") may affect Array#each. I think that the subject that may affect Array#each is a method ("next_value"), in this case. I can understand "next_values doesn't affect Array#each". So, "enumeration sequence by" is not needed, right? --=20 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>