From: Vit Ondruch Date: 2011-09-13T21:00:15+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:39516] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4576] Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number Issue #4576 has been updated by Vit Ondruch. Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 13 September 2011 12:28, Urabe Shyouhei wrote: > > (09/13/2011 06:56 PM), V��t Ondruch wrote: > >> Can somebody please reopen this issue? Since the test suite fix is > >> apparently wrong. > > > > Hi, maybe I'm too unfamiliar with this area, but can you explain a bit > > closer about how the test is apparently wrong? ��It seems OK to me. > > I see no error: > ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-linux] > > Thanks > > Michal As I said, it is i386 or i686 issue, not x86_64. ---------------------------------------- Bug #4576: Range#step miss the last value, if end-exclusive and has float number http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4576 Author: Joey Zhou Status: Closed Priority: Normal Assignee: Category: Target version: ruby -v: - =begin Hi, I find that: * if: range.exclude_end? == true * and: any one in [begin_obj, end_obj, step] is a true Float(f.to_i != f) * and: unless begin_obj + step*int == end_obj * then: the result will miss the last value. for example: p (1...6.3).step.to_a # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0], no 6.0 p (1.1...6).step.to_a # => [1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1], no 5.1 p (1...6).step(1.1).to_a # => [1.0, 2.1, 3.2, 4.300000000000001], no 5.4 p (1.0...6.6).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9], no 4.8 p (1.0...6.7).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8] p (1.0...6.8).step(1.9).to_a # => [1.0, 2.9, 4.8], no 6.7 Maybe the #step is ok on integers, but there's something wrong if the range is end-exclusive and contain float numbers. =end -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org