[#39810] 2.0 feature questionnaire — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
I made a questionnaire "What do you want to introduce in 2.0?" in my
59 messages
2011/10/01
[#39817] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Chuck Remes <cremes.devlist@...>
2011/10/01
[#39822] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...>
2011/10/02
2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>:
[#39827] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/02
Hi,
[#39846] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Jeremy Kemper <jeremy@...>
2011/10/02
On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wro=
[#39847] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/10/02
Oops, I was mentioned.
[#40017] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/10/07
See below.
[#40018] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2011/10/07
(10/07/2011 02:19 PM), Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#40019] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/10/07
[#40021] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/10/07
>> No, it isn't. =A0MVM-aware extensions shall obey the MVM-safe APIs.
[#40324] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/25
2011/10/1 SASADA Koichi <[email protected]>:
[#40331] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/10/25
On Monday, October 24, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
[#40372] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Rocky Bernstein <rockyb@...>
2011/10/25
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]
[#40373] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/25
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Rocky Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40398] Re: 2.0 feature questionnaire
— Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]>
2011/10/26
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Rocky Bernstein <[email protected]>wrote:
[#39823] Discussion results — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
34 messages
2011/10/02
[#39840] Re: Discussion results
— Intransition <transfire@...>
2011/10/02
I did not have the fortune of attending the discussion, but I would
[#39844] Re: Discussion results
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/02
Hi,
[#39851] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2011/10/03
Hello Matz,
[#39862] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/10/03
Hello,
[#39874] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Trans <transfire@...>
2011/10/03
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39875] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...>
2011/10/03
How does String#margin behave when given irregular input?
[#39879] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Trans <transfire@...>
2011/10/03
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jim Freeze <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39883] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Gmail <jimfreeze@...>
2011/10/03
Sent from my iPad
[#39884] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Trans <transfire@...>
2011/10/03
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Gmail <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39869] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2011/10/03
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 14:16, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
[#39909] Re: Discussion results (here documents with indents)
— "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@...>
2011/10/04
[#39824] Road to 2.0 — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
9 messages
2011/10/02
[#39836] Re: Road to 2.0
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/10/02
Hello,
[#39886] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5393][Open] some style fixes in enum.c docs — b t <redmine@...>
7 messages
2011/10/03
[#39888] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5394][Open] Anonymous Symbols, Anonymous Methods — Kurt Stephens <ks.ruby@...>
8 messages
2011/10/03
[#39915] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5400][Open] Remove flip-flops in 2.0 — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
29 messages
2011/10/04
[#39926] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5400][Open] Remove flip-flops in 2.0
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/10/04
Hello,
[#39918] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5401][Open] Ruby 1.9.3 interpreter crash — Conrad Taylor <conradwt@...>
5 messages
2011/10/04
[#39937] redmine 2.0 tracker — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
There is no 2.0 tracker (sub-project) in redmine.
5 messages
2011/10/04
[#39957] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5407][Open] Cannot build ruby-1.9.3-rc1 with TDM-GCC 4.6.1 on Windows XP SP3 — Heesob Park <phasis@...>
11 messages
2011/10/05
[#40177] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5407] Cannot build ruby-1.9.3-rc1 with TDM-GCC 4.6.1 on Windows XP SP3
— Heesob Park <phasis@...>
2011/10/17
[#39986] problems with Refinements — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hi,
13 messages
2011/10/06
[#39988] Re: problems with Refinements
— Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
2011/10/06
There are also the group of people that think refinements are just a
[#39990] Re: problems with Refinements
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/06
Hi,
[#39996] Re: problems with Refinements
— Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
2011/10/06
> Unfortunately, I missed Brian's talk, so we have to wait until the
[#40015] Re: problems with Refinements
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/10/07
Hi,
[#40016] Re: problems with Refinements
— Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
2011/10/07
> I am not sure why
[#39993] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library — David Graham <david.malcom.graham@...>
10 messages
2011/10/06
[#40012] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
— Kenta Murata <muraken@...>
2011/10/07
(2011.10.07 01:50 ), David Graham wrote:
[#40020] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
— Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
2011/10/07
On 07/10/2011, at 1:16 PM, Kenta Murata wrote:
[#40004] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/10/06
(2011/10/07 1:50), David Graham wrote:
[#40008] Re: [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #2348] RBTree Should be Added to the Standard Library
— James Gray <james@...>
2011/10/07
On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 6:34 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40058] Statistical Profiling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
Would it be plausible to somehow, get the (ruby) stack of the running =
7 messages
2011/10/08
[#40073] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5427][Open] Not complex patch to improve `require` time (load.c) — Yura Sokolov <funny.falcon@...>
31 messages
2011/10/09
[#40080] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5427] Not complex patch to improve `require` time (load.c)
— Yui NARUSE <naruse@...>
2011/10/09
[#40117] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5437][Open] Using fibers leads to huge memory leak — Robert Pankowecki <robert.pankowecki@...>
8 messages
2011/10/12
[#40172] plans for 2.0. — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
6 messages
2011/10/17
[#40173] Re: plans for 2.0.
— "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
2011/10/17
2011/10/17 Carter Cheng <[email protected]>:
[#40188] [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
16 messages
2011/10/17
[#40189] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/10/17
This looks very interesting=21 Would someone be willing to translate to e=
[#40191] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments
— Yutaka Hara <yutaka.hara@...>
2011/10/18
Hi,
[#40192] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/18
Hi,
[#40195] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/10/18
Thanks for the translation=21
[#40197] Re: [Ruby 2.0 - Feature #5454] keyword arguments
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/10/18
RnJvbSB0aGUgY3VycmVudCBwYXRjaCBpdCBzZWVtcyB0byBtZSB0aGF0IHRoaXMgd291bGQgcmFp
[#40200] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #5459][Open] Silence -Wmissing-declarations and -Wold-style-definition warnings in mkmf — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
5 messages
2011/10/18
[#40203] invoking garbage_collect in gc.c — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
4 messages
2011/10/18
[#40259] Counseling — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
Ruby and I are back in counseling... Its always the same thing with =
21 messages
2011/10/21
[#40263] Re: Counseling
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/10/21
What's your $LC_CTYPE? What OS are you on?
[#40264] Re: Counseling
— Gon軋lo Silva <goncalossilva@...>
2011/10/21
Hi all,
[#40266] Re: Counseling
— Bill Kelly <billk@...>
2011/10/21
Gon軋lo Silva wrote:
[#40267] Re: Counseling
— Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
2011/10/22
[#40268] Re: Counseling
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/22
On Oct 21, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Perry Smith wrote:
[#40269] Re: Counseling
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/10/22
To try and cut to the core of the issue: in Ruby 1.8 it was common practi=
[#40278] Re: Counseling
— Jon <jon.forums@...>
2011/10/22
> What Ruby needs (IMHO), is the equivalent of Obj-C's NSData class. That is,
[#40286] Re: Counseling
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/10/23
On Saturday, October 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jon wrote:
[#40271] Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"? — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Hello, rubygems developers --
17 messages
2011/10/22
[#40276] Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/10/22
Forwarding this again to ruby-core as received a postmaster delivery failur=
[#40918] Re: Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/11/10
Hello,
[#40919] Re: Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/11/10
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40920] Re: Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/11/10
Hello,
[#40921] Re: Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/11/10
2011/11/10 Yusuke Endoh <[email protected]>:
[#40925] Re: Fwd: Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/11/10
Hello,
[#40579] Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/10/31
Dne 22.10.2011 4:48, Yusuke Endoh napsal(a):
[#40584] Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/10/31
On Oct 31, 2011, at 2:41 PM, V=EDt Ondruch wrote:
[#40651] Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...>
2011/11/01
Dne 1.11.2011 0:05, Eric Hodel napsal(a):
[#40655] Re: Can rubygems save us from "binary-compatibility hell"?
— Eric Hodel <[email protected]>
2011/11/01
On Nov 1, 2011, at 2:03 PM, V=EDt Ondruch wrote:
[#40281] [Ruby 2.0 - Bug #5470][Open] r33507 and r33508 break the build under MinGW — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
4 messages
2011/10/22
[#40284] set_trace_func changed? — Intransition <transfire@...>
Did something change about `set_trace_func` between 1.8.7 and 1.9.3?
5 messages
2011/10/22
[#40290] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
36 messages
2011/10/23
[#40518] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2011/10/29
Hi,
[#40298] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/24
Hi,
[#40299] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2011/10/24
See below.
[#40300] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/24
Hi,
[#40675] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/11/02
> |> It's Python way, and I won't take it.
[#40414] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/26
More refinement below. I think we're on a good path here.
[#40416] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/26
Hi,
[#40418] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Joshua Ballanco <jballanc@...>
2011/10/26
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]>wrote:
[#40425] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/27
Hi,
[#40431] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/27
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <[email protected]> wr=
[#40447] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2011/10/27
Hi,
[#40449] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/27
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrot=
[#40451] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5474][Assigned] keyword argument
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2011/10/27
Hi,
[#40311] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478][Open] import Set into core, add syntax — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>
33 messages
2011/10/24
[#41476] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478] import Set into core, add syntax
— Alexey Muranov <muranov@...>
2011/12/04
[#41480] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5478] import Set into core, add syntax
— Eero Saynatkari <ruby-ml@...>
2011/12/04
On 2011-12-04, at 16:15:00, Alexey Muranov wrote:
[#40312] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479][Open] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io — Konstantin Haase <Konstantin.Haase@...>
9 messages
2011/10/24
[#40350] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io
— Charles Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/25
[#40363] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2011/10/25
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:14:54PM +0900, Charles Nutter wrote:
[#40365] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io
— "Haase, Konstantin" <Konstantin.Haase@...>
2011/10/25
My main request was to add String#to_io, as Aaron described, so this protoc=
[#40367] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5479] import StringIO into core, add String#to_io
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2011/10/25
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 02:22:21AM +0900, Haase, Konstantin wrote:
[#40314] [ANN] 2011 Call for grant proposals — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
Hello,
8 messages
2011/10/24
[#41495] Re: [ANN] 2011 Call for grant proposals
— Shugo Maeda <shugo@...>
2011/12/06
Hello,
[#41504] Re: [ANN] 2011 Call for grant proposals
— Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
2011/12/06
> Ruby reference manual for you, me and everyoneApplicant: Yutaka Hara
[#40316] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481][Open] Gemifying Ruby standard library — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
86 messages
2011/10/24
[#40318] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library
— Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
2011/10/24
[#40334] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library
— Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
2011/10/25
[#40343] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library
— Intransition <transfire@...>
2011/10/25
[#40345] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5481] Gemifying Ruby standard library
— Magnus Holm <judofyr@...>
2011/10/25
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 14:45, Intransition <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40322] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0 — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
19 messages
2011/10/25
[#40326] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2011/10/25
Come back when all 1.9 features and callcc are implemented :-)
[#40330] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/10/25
(2011/10/25 12:46), Yusuke Endoh wrote:
[#40400] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
— Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]>
2011/10/26
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, SASADA Koichi <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40410] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482][Open] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/26
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:45 PM, Tim Felgentreff <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40325] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5482] Rubinius as basis for Ruby 2.0
— Charles Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/25
[#40356] JIT development for MRI — Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
Hello,
25 messages
2011/10/25
[#40361] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
2011/10/25
Hello Charlie,
[#40390] Re: JIT development for MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/10/26
Hi,
[#40394] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
2011/10/26
Dear Koichi SASADA,
[#40395] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
2011/10/26
I noticed that you used context threading in YARV. Do you have some analysis
[#40417] Re: JIT development for MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/10/26
Thanks for reference.
[#40423] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
2011/10/26
Thanks Koichi.
[#40437] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2011/10/27
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Carter Cheng <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40439] Re: JIT development for MRI
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2011/10/27
Hi Carter,
[#40441] Re: JIT development for MRI
— Carter Cheng <cartercheng@...>
2011/10/27
Thanks Koichi. How do profiling based approaches differ from trace recording
[#40412] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Open] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
15 messages
2011/10/26
[#40482] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Usaku NAKAMURA <redmine@...>
2011/10/28
[#40486] Re: [ruby-core:40482] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2011/10/28
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 07:28, Usaku NAKAMURA <[email protected]> wrote=
[#40487] Re: [ruby-core:40482] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2011/10/28
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:14, Nikolai Weibull <[email protected]> wrote:
[#43236] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Feedback] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2012/03/11
[#43260] Re: [ruby-core:43236] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Feedback] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2012/03/13
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 22:41, Nobuyoshi Nakada <[email protected]> wrote:
[#43288] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Feedback] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
2012/03/15
Hello,
[#43294] Re: [ruby-core:43288] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #5486][Feedback] rb_stat() doesn’t respect input encoding
— Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
2012/03/15
2012/3/15 U.Nakamura <[email protected]>:
[#40427] cfp consistency error — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi, I'm getting a cfp consistency error when I use trunk ruby. Here is
5 messages
2011/10/27
[#40453] Test case format — Jon <jon.forums@...>
I see no mention of a required (or preferred) test case format after reviewing:
4 messages
2011/10/27
[#40455] Re: Test case format
— Martin Bo煬et <martin.bosslet@...>
2011/10/27
2011/10/27 Jon <[email protected]>:
[#40489] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5497][Open] Math.log10(10_000) error on HP-UX/PA — The Written Word Inc <bugs-ruby@...>
10 messages
2011/10/28
[#40492] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5505][Open] BasicObject#__extend__ — Thomas Sawyer <transfire@...>
5 messages
2011/10/28
[#40527] [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
9 messages
2011/10/30
[#40528] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/10/30
Hello,
[#40529] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out
— Yugui <yugui@...>
2011/10/30
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:11 PM, Luis Lavena <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40530] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out
— Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
2011/10/30
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Yugui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40535] Re: [ANN] Ruby 1.9.3-p0 is out
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2011/10/30
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Yugui <[email protected]> wrote:
[#40562] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5525][Open] UDPSocket#bind(ip, port) fails under IPv6 => Errno::EAFNOSUPPORT — Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@...>
6 messages
2011/10/31
[#40571] [ruby-trunk - Bug #5529][Open] Bus error with Fibers on OSX Lion — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
10 messages
2011/10/31
[#40586] [ruby-trunk - Feature #5531][Open] deep_value for dealing with nested hashes — Kyle Peyton <kylepeyton@...>
19 messages
2011/10/31
[ruby-core:40159] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #5448] Singleton module's ::instance method should forward parameters
From:
Marvin Gülker <sutniuq@...>
Date:
2011-10-15 15:24:50 UTC
List:
ruby-core #40159
Issue #5448 has been updated by Marvin G端lker.
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
> Singleton has only one instance, why do you need parameters?
Maybe you're right, because one could do it with accessors as well. However, beside that a Singleton can just have one instance, there's nothing special about them, therefore I personally think that there shouldn't be anything special about it's #initialize method as well. "Normal" classes can have parameters for #initialize which are respected by the ::new method of the respecitive class. For symmetry I think it should work the same way with the ::instance method.
Plus: It causes a hard to understand exception message. As I've shown in the initial example, an #initialize with parameters renders the class unusable in "normal" terms. You cannot instanciate it, not even the single instance allowed by the Singleton module. The exception message, "wrong number of arguments (1 for 0) (ArgumentError)", caused by the code that one expected to forward it's arguments to #initialize makes one think that there's something wrong with the call, but comparing the call to ::instance and the parameters #initialize takes, there's nothing wrong. Then, on the second glance, one realizes that the exception is actually caused from _within_ Ruby's standard library and the ArgumentError is not directly a result of instanciating the Foo class, but rather the result of Singleton's incapability of forwarding the arguments to the #initialize method.
> What's wrong with:
>
> class FooSingleton < Foo
> include Singleton
> def initialize
> super(1)
> end
> end
It adds an extra layer of complexity where none is needed. The Foo class itself is unusable, and just to instanciate it I have to make a subclass of it which in turn I can instanciate then. Subclassing is not meant to make classes instanciatable and I didn't define an abstract class (Ruby doesn't need things like that)--and this subclass isn't a subclass in the logical "kind-of" way. It's just a helper construct to circumvent a problem. As stated earlier, I would use an accessor if the situation stays like it is now, because that appears a bit cleaner to me. I happen to think that classes mixing in the Singleton module shouldn't be more special than normal classes beside their "singletonness".
Vale,
Marvin
----------------------------------------
Feature #5448: Singleton module's ::instance method should forward parameters
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/5448
Author: Marvin G端lker
Status: Feedback
Priority: Normal
Assignee:
Category: lib
Target version:
Hi there,
Classes mixing in the Singleton module currently aren't allowed to have parameters for their initialize method. This should be changed, because sometimes it's necessary to give some initial state information to the single(ton) instance.
Example code (no way to create the instance):
================================================
require "singleton"
class Foo
include Singleton
def initialize(arg)
puts "arg is: #{arg}"
end
end
f = Foo.instance(1) #=> ArgumentError 1 for 0
f = Foo.instance #=> ArgumentError 0 for 1
================================================
The arguments given to the ::instance method should be forwarded to #initialize, which in turn may raise the appropriate ArgumentError if necessary.
ruby -v: ruby 1.9.2p290 (2011-07-09 revision 32553) [x86_64-linux]
OS: Arch Linux
Marvin
--
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org