From: Hiroshi Nakamura Date: 2011-11-08T12:56:02+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:40829] Re: Proposal for sustainable branch maintenance -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (2011/11/08 0:25), Yugui wrote: >>> == Proposal Let's parallelize the bottle-neck. Review and tests >>> are necessary for stability and compatibility of released >>> branches but these processes can be parallelized. I propose the >>> following process: >> >> I agree this in general. There're some other proposals such as review before commit, but we accept Yugui's proposal for now and start doing this, right? According to commits to ruby_1_9_3, @arton is doing this already. I'm not against it. Let's find problems by doing now. Proposals like review before commit, requires LGTM*2 by committer, would be good for new proposal for branch maintenance. Now go write a proposal how good/bad it is and file a ticket! >>> * Another committer review the request. This reviewer checks if >>> this commit is good enough and backport it to the older >>> branch. >> >> Do you mean the word "backport" as committing? If so, who changes >> patchlevel? The committer? You? > > I think the committer who commit the patch should also change patch > level. Both Shyouhei's and my backport scripts automatically bump > patch level, so it is not so hard. @arton, can you do this? // NaHi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOuKhFAAoJEC7N6P3yLbI20s4H/1nGsHqYQkouPSAd9R7deXUj xSHWQ7kdRK056KID5wqewuqKxYkldgzAAZ0+osIeQuIpWP2HyiTdQJ+1os1y7IZa osLvKo0FqlDAE/SZLlF9pC8aXl8VCrNF/Mmo5AAxUk4hfz4PYZNkBfBZWb38h/cb yTcpgN/d+N/Be6by29MkhMsqxuffojoiowFX8bCK/WaETExLiLRNB+Pfy5Dnvx7j /aomyBS9uRbA4aGUuWfujW8MATo0SikOgNez/2dhBeqVhrea5jAXsIlju6ndsInD pQGs6xlijxi2ZDhjTcfdXBhhV0CJgiGzAJtk/PMBmn1y3+G/BgWjWTMnW7kes2E= =FiZ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----